The simulation errors of the three survey monitoring points under the measured rainfall are shown in Table 1. From this table, it can be seen that the simulated results of waterlogging monitoring locations are highly consistent with the measured results.
Comparison between simulated ponding and measured water.
| Monitoring point . | Waterlogging area (m2) (simulated/measured) . | Waterlogging depth (m) (simulated/measured) . |
|---|---|---|
| P1 | 916/>1,000 | 36/>25 |
| P2 | 1,566/>1,600 | 40/>40 |
| P3 | 1,734/>1,800 | 52>48 |
| Monitoring point . | Waterlogging area (m2) (simulated/measured) . | Waterlogging depth (m) (simulated/measured) . |
|---|---|---|
| P1 | 916/>1,000 | 36/>25 |
| P2 | 1,566/>1,600 | 40/>40 |
| P3 | 1,734/>1,800 | 52>48 |