The waterlogging risk map adopts the water depth map under the return period of five-year rainfall, as shown in Figure 7. Integrating the ponding depth, land use type, and building damage characteristics determines the initial construction point of LID facilities as shown in Figure 8. This study took the three construction initial points as the construction center and successively added various LID facilities to the outer boundary until getting the maximum constructable boundary. For capturing the relationship between the construction area of LID facilities and the construction effect accurately, according to the layout method of LID facilities in section 2.3.2, increased the area of two LID facilities five times successively, and finally got six groups of simulation results for each single facility of pervious pavement and rainwater garden, as well as 36 groups of simulation results for the combined LID facilities, as shown in Table 3.
Table 3

Simulation results of different LID facility construction cases.

Case numberPervious pavement area (m2)Rainwater garden area (m2)Peak ponding reduction (m3)Case numberPervious pavement area (m2)Rainwater garden area (m2)Peak ponding reduction (m3)
Case 1 19,012 433.6 Case 19 107,591 109,955 2,265.5 
Case 2 19,012 30,588 678.1 Case 20 164,091 2,124.8 
Case 3 30,588 316.2 Case 21 164,091 30,588 2,368.5 
Case 4 39,787 858 Case 22 164,091 90,411 2,697.7 
Case 5 39,787 30,588 1,101 Case 23 164,091 109,893 2,725 
Case 6 39,787 90,411 1,431.6 Case 24 164,091 117,184 2,742.3 
Case 7 107,591 1,665.3 Case 25 225,622 2,796.8 
Case 8 107,591 30,588 1,908.8 Case 26 225,622 30,588 3,041.3 
Case 9 107,591 90,411 2,238 Case 27 225,622 90,411 3,371.1 
Case 10 225,622 109,893 3,398.3 Case 28 19,012 109,955 1,238.9 
Case 11 225,622 117,184 3,415.6 Case 29 19,012 117,184 1,285.4 
Case 12 225,622 135,175 3,443.4 Case 30 39,787 109,893 1,532.1 
Case 13 164,091 135,175 2,809.5 Case 31 39,787 117,184 1,578.4 
Case 14 107,591 135,175 2,380.8 Case 32 107,591 117,184 2,310.5 
Case 15 39,787 135,175 1,648.7 Case 33 90,411 783.1 
Case 16 19,012 135,175 1,355.7 Case 34 109,955 886.5 
Case 17 135,175 1,003.1 Case 35 117,184 932.8 
Case 18 19,012 90,411 1,138.5 Case 36 
Case numberPervious pavement area (m2)Rainwater garden area (m2)Peak ponding reduction (m3)Case numberPervious pavement area (m2)Rainwater garden area (m2)Peak ponding reduction (m3)
Case 1 19,012 433.6 Case 19 107,591 109,955 2,265.5 
Case 2 19,012 30,588 678.1 Case 20 164,091 2,124.8 
Case 3 30,588 316.2 Case 21 164,091 30,588 2,368.5 
Case 4 39,787 858 Case 22 164,091 90,411 2,697.7 
Case 5 39,787 30,588 1,101 Case 23 164,091 109,893 2,725 
Case 6 39,787 90,411 1,431.6 Case 24 164,091 117,184 2,742.3 
Case 7 107,591 1,665.3 Case 25 225,622 2,796.8 
Case 8 107,591 30,588 1,908.8 Case 26 225,622 30,588 3,041.3 
Case 9 107,591 90,411 2,238 Case 27 225,622 90,411 3,371.1 
Case 10 225,622 109,893 3,398.3 Case 28 19,012 109,955 1,238.9 
Case 11 225,622 117,184 3,415.6 Case 29 19,012 117,184 1,285.4 
Case 12 225,622 135,175 3,443.4 Case 30 39,787 109,893 1,532.1 
Case 13 164,091 135,175 2,809.5 Case 31 39,787 117,184 1,578.4 
Case 14 107,591 135,175 2,380.8 Case 32 107,591 117,184 2,310.5 
Case 15 39,787 135,175 1,648.7 Case 33 90,411 783.1 
Case 16 19,012 135,175 1,355.7 Case 34 109,955 886.5 
Case 17 135,175 1,003.1 Case 35 117,184 932.8 
Case 18 19,012 90,411 1,138.5 Case 36 
Fig. 7

Waterlogging risk map.

Fig. 7

Waterlogging risk map.

Close modal
Fig. 8

Schematic diagram of the initial construction point.

Fig. 8

Schematic diagram of the initial construction point.

Close modal
Close Modal

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal