For PVDF membranes, a different result was seen compared to PES. Figure 5 shows the strain vs. stress curve for PVDF (control) and UDD-embedded PVDF membranes and Table 5 shows the membranes’ Young Modulus. UDD-embedded membranes showed a decrease in yield point and Young Modulus values compared to commercial PVDF. The decrease in these properties, i.e. the membranes' ability to withstand stress without deforming in the elastic region, may be due to the UDDs dispersion throughout the asymmetrical porous surface (Yuan et al. 2020). These changes in the membranes’ plastic and elastic regions are consistent with the findings reported in the literature on how the incorporation of NDs changes the membrane's mechanical properties (Zhai et al. 2011; Bedar et al. 2020a, 2020b).
Table 5

Young Modulus value comparison between the pristine UDD and functionalized UDD-embedded PVDF membranes

Young Modulus (Pa)PVDFPVDF UDDPVDF UDD + 1 min sonicationPVDF UDD + 2 min sonication
 27,705 29,755 21,381 23,940 
Young Modulus (Pa)PVDFPVDF UDD Funct.PVDF UDD Funct. + 1 min sonicationPES UDD Funct. + 2 min sonication
 27,705 21,163 23,573 21,503 
Young Modulus (Pa)PVDFPVDF UDDPVDF UDD + 1 min sonicationPVDF UDD + 2 min sonication
 27,705 29,755 21,381 23,940 
Young Modulus (Pa)PVDFPVDF UDD Funct.PVDF UDD Funct. + 1 min sonicationPES UDD Funct. + 2 min sonication
 27,705 21,163 23,573 21,503 
Figure 5

Strain vs. stress curve for PVDF pristine UDD membranes (above) and PVDF UDD functionalized membranes (below).

Figure 5

Strain vs. stress curve for PVDF pristine UDD membranes (above) and PVDF UDD functionalized membranes (below).

Close modal
Close Modal

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal