Bactericidal properties of studied membranes are illustrated in Tables 6 and 8 showing the CFU death rate % comparison between the commercial and UDD-embedded membranes. When microbially polluted water was filtered by the UDD-embedded PES membrane, the filtered water showed a death rate of 89% compared to the 88% shown by the commercially available PES membrane. At a 5% confidence interval, T-test analysis between the UDD-embedded PES and the commercial PES indicates no significant reduction on fecal E. coli CFU after the filtration was performed. Different from this, a significant difference in bacteria removal was seen, with a value of 0.02, between the functionalized UDD-embedded PES membrane and commercial PES indicating that the excess particle clusters above the membrane do not improve bactericidal properties and can lead to poor bacteria removal.
Fecal E. coli CFU and % rate percentage of UDD PES membrane filtration characterization
. | Control . | PES membrane . | UDD/PES membrane . | UDD/PES membrane 1 min sonication . | UDD/PES membrane 2 min sonication . | UDD funct./PES membrane . | UDD funct./PES membrane 1 min sonication . | UDD funct./PES membrane 2 min sonication . |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CFU | 12,000 | 1,493 | 1,360 | 1,107 | 1,080 | 2,533 | 800 | 480 |
± | 0 | 23 | 302 | 220 | 396 | 231 | 57 | 170 |
Death Rate % | 0 | 88 | 89 | 91 | 91 | 79 | 93 | 96 |
. | Control . | PES membrane . | UDD/PES membrane . | UDD/PES membrane 1 min sonication . | UDD/PES membrane 2 min sonication . | UDD funct./PES membrane . | UDD funct./PES membrane 1 min sonication . | UDD funct./PES membrane 2 min sonication . |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CFU | 12,000 | 1,493 | 1,360 | 1,107 | 1,080 | 2,533 | 800 | 480 |
± | 0 | 23 | 302 | 220 | 396 | 231 | 57 | 170 |
Death Rate % | 0 | 88 | 89 | 91 | 91 | 79 | 93 | 96 |