Figure A.5 is a graphical representation of all eight identified as (sub)optimal solutions for the VB4-hi case, presenting dam locations and heights, BL, together with relevant info, ranking based on FV, the number of dams proposed and the increase in FV compared to the best solution (Sol2΄). Table 8 presents the produced solutions (Sols) by the seven MP value tests for each 1 of the 10 runs per MP value, together with the number of different solutions found and the number of times the optimal solution (Sol2΄) was found. There is no clear evidence of the impact of the MP value on the consistency of finding the optimal solution or the ability to identify many sub-optimal solutions, nor could a general rule be devised.

Table 8

The produced solutions by each one of the 7 MP values for each 1 of the 10 runs per MP value, together with the number of solutions identified per MP value and the number of times the optimal solution (Sol2΄; highlighted in bold) was found per MP value

NrMPSol found for each run (VB4-hi)
Nr of SolsaNr of opt. Solb
Run =12345678910
1 0.010 1′ 2′ 2′ 2′ 2′ 2′ 3′ 2′ 1′ 2′ 
2 0.015 2′ 2′ 1′ 2′ 2′ 2′ 2′ 2′ 3′ 1′ 
3 0.020 3′ 3′ 2′ 2′ 3′ 2′ 1′ 2′ 3′ 2′ 
4 0.025 4′ 1′ 5′ 2′ 2′ 6′ 4′ 6′ 7′ 5′ 
5 0.030 3′ 2′ 2′ 2′ 4′ 2′ 1′ 8′ 4′ 2′ 
6 0.035 1′ 2′ 2′ 2′ 2′ 2′ 3′ 2′ 2′ 2′ 
7 0.040 3′ 1′ 2′ 2′ 2′ 1′ 3′ 2′ 1′ 3′ 
NrMPSol found for each run (VB4-hi)
Nr of SolsaNr of opt. Solb
Run =12345678910
1 0.010 1′ 2′ 2′ 2′ 2′ 2′ 3′ 2′ 1′ 2′ 
2 0.015 2′ 2′ 1′ 2′ 2′ 2′ 2′ 2′ 3′ 1′ 
3 0.020 3′ 3′ 2′ 2′ 3′ 2′ 1′ 2′ 3′ 2′ 
4 0.025 4′ 1′ 5′ 2′ 2′ 6′ 4′ 6′ 7′ 5′ 
5 0.030 3′ 2′ 2′ 2′ 4′ 2′ 1′ 8′ 4′ 2′ 
6 0.035 1′ 2′ 2′ 2′ 2′ 2′ 3′ 2′ 2′ 2′ 
7 0.040 3′ 1′ 2′ 2′ 2′ 1′ 3′ 2′ 1′ 3′ 

aNr of Sols = number of solutions identified.

bNr opt. Sol = number of times the optimal solution (Sol2′) was found.

Close Modal

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal