Result of sensitivity analysis
. | . | . | Statistical indicators . | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
The best SVM models . | Input combinations . | Eliminated variable . | R2 . | DC . | RMSE . |
NLW 10 | HT/P, Lc/W, A/w, Fr | – | 0.990 | 0.988 | 0.007 |
HT/P, Lc/W, A/w | Fr | 0.921 | 0.910 | 0.020 | |
Lc/W, A/w, Fr | HT/P | 0.931 | 0.913 | 0.019 | |
HT/P, A/w, FrHT/P, Lc/W, Fr | Lc/WA/w | 0.964 0.977 | 0.958 0.961 | 0.016 0.015 | |
The best SVM model . | Input combination . | Eliminated variable . | R2 . | DC . | RMSE . |
ILW 9 | HT/P, α, Lc/W, A/w, w/p, Fr | – | 0.981 | 0.954 | 0.025 |
HT/P, α, Lc/W, A/w, w/p | Fr | 0.915 | 0.913 | 0.029 | |
α, Lc/W, A/w, w/p, Fr | HT/P | 0.933 | 0.915 | 0.029 | |
HT/P, Lc/W, A/w, w/p, Fr | α | 0.965 | 0.960 | 0.026 | |
HT/P, α, A/w, w/p, Fr | Lc/W | 0.950 | 0.942 | 0.027 | |
HT/P, α, Lc/W, A/w, Fr | A/w | 0.966 | 0.960 | 0.026 | |
HT/P, α, Lc/W, A/w, Fr | w/P | 0.964 | 0.958 | 0.026 | |
The best SVM model . | Input combination . | Eliminated variable . | R2 . | DC . | RMSE . |
ALW 7 | HT/P, Lc/W, α/θ | – | 0.970 | 0.967 | 0.013 |
Lc/W, α/θ | HT/P | 0.651 | 0.606 | 0.098 | |
HT/P, α/θ | Lc/W | 0.952 | 0.943 | 0.016 | |
HT/P, Lc/W | α/θ | 0.942 | 0.929 | 0.017 | |
The best SVM model . | Input combination . | Eliminated variable . | R2 . | DC . | RMSE . |
ALWB 7 | HT/P, Lc/W, α/θ | – | 0.960 | 0.958 | 0.010 |
Lc/W, α/θ | HT/P | 0.623 | 0.431 | 0.107 | |
HT/P, α/θ | Lc/W | 0.915 | 0.913 | 0.033 | |
HT/P, Lc/W | α/θ | 0.831 | 0.511 | 0.040 |
. | . | . | Statistical indicators . | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
The best SVM models . | Input combinations . | Eliminated variable . | R2 . | DC . | RMSE . |
NLW 10 | HT/P, Lc/W, A/w, Fr | – | 0.990 | 0.988 | 0.007 |
HT/P, Lc/W, A/w | Fr | 0.921 | 0.910 | 0.020 | |
Lc/W, A/w, Fr | HT/P | 0.931 | 0.913 | 0.019 | |
HT/P, A/w, FrHT/P, Lc/W, Fr | Lc/WA/w | 0.964 0.977 | 0.958 0.961 | 0.016 0.015 | |
The best SVM model . | Input combination . | Eliminated variable . | R2 . | DC . | RMSE . |
ILW 9 | HT/P, α, Lc/W, A/w, w/p, Fr | – | 0.981 | 0.954 | 0.025 |
HT/P, α, Lc/W, A/w, w/p | Fr | 0.915 | 0.913 | 0.029 | |
α, Lc/W, A/w, w/p, Fr | HT/P | 0.933 | 0.915 | 0.029 | |
HT/P, Lc/W, A/w, w/p, Fr | α | 0.965 | 0.960 | 0.026 | |
HT/P, α, A/w, w/p, Fr | Lc/W | 0.950 | 0.942 | 0.027 | |
HT/P, α, Lc/W, A/w, Fr | A/w | 0.966 | 0.960 | 0.026 | |
HT/P, α, Lc/W, A/w, Fr | w/P | 0.964 | 0.958 | 0.026 | |
The best SVM model . | Input combination . | Eliminated variable . | R2 . | DC . | RMSE . |
ALW 7 | HT/P, Lc/W, α/θ | – | 0.970 | 0.967 | 0.013 |
Lc/W, α/θ | HT/P | 0.651 | 0.606 | 0.098 | |
HT/P, α/θ | Lc/W | 0.952 | 0.943 | 0.016 | |
HT/P, Lc/W | α/θ | 0.942 | 0.929 | 0.017 | |
The best SVM model . | Input combination . | Eliminated variable . | R2 . | DC . | RMSE . |
ALWB 7 | HT/P, Lc/W, α/θ | – | 0.960 | 0.958 | 0.010 |
Lc/W, α/θ | HT/P | 0.623 | 0.431 | 0.107 | |
HT/P, α/θ | Lc/W | 0.915 | 0.913 | 0.033 | |
HT/P, Lc/W | α/θ | 0.831 | 0.511 | 0.040 |