Some of these changes in YLX, WJB, and HQ are enlarged and illustrated in
Figure 5. Looking into the detailed changes, as shown in
Figure 5, it is found that in YLX, the streams based on
TI1 and
TI3 turn from an area covered with Mollic Gleysols (GLm) to a place covered with Gelic Leptosols (LPi) at the point labeled A1. As to the impacts of
K, the stream based on
TI2 turns from LPi to GLm at A2. In WJB, the streams based on
TI1 and
TI3 turn from Eutric Planosols (PLe) to Dystric Cambisols (CMd) at point B1. The stream based on
TI2 turns from Eutric Fluvisols (FLe) to PLe at B2. In HQ, the streams based on
TI1,
TI2, and
TI3 turn from Haplic Acrisols (Ach) to Cumulic Anthrosols (ATc) at C1 and C2. The
Ks,
K,and
Ks·K values of the mentioned soils are listed in Table 3.
Table 3Parameter values of different soil types
Soil type
. | Ks
. | K
. | KsK
. |
---|
Mollic Gleysols (GLm) | 10.090 | 0.283 | 2.855 |
Gelic Leptosols (LPi) | 59.350 | 0.256 | 15.194 |
Eutric Planosols (PLe) | 4.890 | 0.214 | 1.046 |
Dystric Cambisols (CMd) | 21.490 | 0.290 | 6.232 |
Eutric Fluvisols (FLe) | 36.23 | 0.162 | 5.869 |
Haplic Acrisols (Ach) | 0.580 | 0.263 | 0.153 |
Cumulic Anthrosols (ATc) | 10.220 | 0.329 | 3.362 |
Soil type
. | Ks
. | K
. | KsK
. |
---|
Mollic Gleysols (GLm) | 10.090 | 0.283 | 2.855 |
Gelic Leptosols (LPi) | 59.350 | 0.256 | 15.194 |
Eutric Planosols (PLe) | 4.890 | 0.214 | 1.046 |
Dystric Cambisols (CMd) | 21.490 | 0.290 | 6.232 |
Eutric Fluvisols (FLe) | 36.23 | 0.162 | 5.869 |
Haplic Acrisols (Ach) | 0.580 | 0.263 | 0.153 |
Cumulic Anthrosols (ATc) | 10.220 | 0.329 | 3.362 |
Figure 5
Enlarged partial drawings of stream networks based on TI and TI′.
Figure 5
Enlarged partial drawings of stream networks based on TI and TI′.
Close modal