This paper outlines the findings of a fecal sludge management (FSM) initial scoping study in 12 cities. This short, desk-based study assesses the institutional context and the outcome in terms of the amount of fecal sludge safely managed in each city. A range of cities was included in the review, all in low- and middle-income countries. None of the cities studied managed fecal sludge effectively, although performance varied. Where cities are seeking to address fecal sludge challenges the solutions are, at best, only partial, with a focus on sewerage which serves a small minority in most cases. FSM requires strong city-level oversight and an enabling environment that drives coordinated actions along the sanitation service chain; this was largely absent in the cities studied. Based on the findings of the review a typology of cities was developed to aid the identification of key interventions to improve FSM service delivery. Additional work is recommended to further improve the tools used in this study in order to enable better understanding of the FSM challenges and identify appropriate operational solutions.
Skip Nav Destination
Article navigation
Review Article|
September 22 2014
Fecal sludge management: a comparative analysis of 12 cities
Andy Peal;
1Independent consultant, Macclesfield, Cheshire, UK
E-mail: [email protected]
Search for other works by this author on:
Barbara Evans;
Barbara Evans
2University of Leeds, School of Civil Engineering, Leeds, UK
Search for other works by this author on:
Isabel Blackett;
Isabel Blackett
3Water and Sanitation Program (WSP), World Bank, 1818 H St NW, Washington, DC 20433, United States
Search for other works by this author on:
Peter Hawkins;
Peter Hawkins
3Water and Sanitation Program (WSP), World Bank, 1818 H St NW, Washington, DC 20433, United States
Search for other works by this author on:
Chris Heymans
Chris Heymans
3Water and Sanitation Program (WSP), World Bank, 1818 H St NW, Washington, DC 20433, United States
Search for other works by this author on:
Journal of Water, Sanitation and Hygiene for Development (2014) 4 (4): 563–575.
Article history
Received:
February 25 2014
Accepted:
August 01 2014
Citation
Andy Peal, Barbara Evans, Isabel Blackett, Peter Hawkins, Chris Heymans; Fecal sludge management: a comparative analysis of 12 cities. Journal of Water, Sanitation and Hygiene for Development 1 December 2014; 4 (4): 563–575. doi: https://doi.org/10.2166/washdev.2014.026
Download citation file:
Sign in
Don't already have an account? Register
Client Account
You could not be signed in. Please check your email address / username and password and try again.
Could not validate captcha. Please try again.
eBook
Pay-Per-View Access
$38.00