Abstract
Sachet water is one of the primary sources of drinking water in rapidly growing countries. A study to assess the microbiological quality of sachet water in 21 different brands was conducted in Ghana. Culturable total coliform was positive in 87% of the samples collected, where Escherichia coli colonies were absent. The analysis of quantitative polymerase chain reaction results indicated the presence of E. coli genes in 44.6% of the samples, with the highest concentration up to 3,166 CCE/100 ml. Microbial source tracking analyses showed that the source of E. coli genes did not originate from sewage contamination because the human-associated HF183 marker was not detected. Of the 175 samples tested, 71% did not mention any water treatment before filling the packages. These results suggest non-human sources of contamination, such as biofilm formation in the pipelines used to fill these packages due to poor disinfection. Our study shows an urgent need for increased regulation and standardized manufacturing of sachet water to ensure safe drinking water.
INTRODUCTION
Ghana has been experiencing rapid urban development and a population increase (World Bank 2019), leading to a significant depletion of safe drinking water supplies. In the capital city of Accra, approximately 75% of the population lacks 24-h water access (Stoler et al. 2012a), which is the main driver for the widespread use of packaged water (Fisher et al. 2015; Stoler et al. 2015a). Sachet water is a form of affordable packaged water, usually sold in 500 ml polythene sealed bags, and is often promoted as ‘hygienically produced drinking water’ (Stoler et al. 2012b). According to a national survey, 27.6% of Ghanaian urban households reported sachet water as their primary source of drinking water (Ghana Statistical Service 2011).
One concern regarding sachet water has been the quality of the product (Stoler 2017). According to the World Health Organization (WHO), safe drinking water should not contain any pathogens (WHO 2017a). Total coliforms (TCs) and Escherichia coli are often used as indicators of microbiological contamination (Ashbolt 2004). A recent meta-analysis revealed that about 45% of the studies on packaged water quality detected various levels of microorganisms (Williams et al. 2015). Stoler (2017) showed that many studies on sachet water quality reported the presence of TC, fecal coliform, E. coli, or in some cases, Salmonella or protozoa.
Studies have shown that indicator bacteria can grow in warm water environments, and some of these strains may not be of human origin (Parveen et al. 2011). Microbial source tracking (MST) is a well-established molecular microbiology technique used to identify the sources of fecal contamination in water (Harwood et al. 2014). Among many markers, genes belong to the Bacteroides genus have been widely studied for MST (Ahmed et al. 2009; Aslan & Rose 2013), and Bacteroides HF183 is reported as 99% specific for human-associated water contamination (Shanks et al. 2010). Because pathogens in water can also originate from non-human or even non-fecal sources, the human health risk associated with exposure may differ significantly. Therefore, identifying the source of microbiological contamination can provide decision makers valuable information when developing water safety policies.
The purpose of this study was to examine the sources of bacteria in sachet water collected from six cities in Ghana. The TC and E. coli concentrations were compared among different manufacturers. Samples with elevated levels of indicator bacteria were further tested for a human-associated source tracking marker (HF183) to investigate the origin of contamination. Additionally, the information on package labels was examined for conformity and standards compliance.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Study design, sample collection and processing
Samples were collected from six locations in Ghana (Tamale, Kintampo, Techiman, Kumasi, Cape Coast, and Accra). A total of 175 sachets from 21 brands (88 samples (12 brands) in 2015 and 87 samples (nine brands) in 2016) were purchased from market vendors or kiosks where sachet water is kept in dark and cold conditions, avoiding direct sunlight. Samples were randomly selected from the piles located at the market vendors and transported in a cooler with ice until arriving at the hotel. These samples were kept in the freezer until the day of departure and transported in ice-packed coolers to the USA. In 2016, samples were also used for enumerating culturable TC and E. coli (n = 87) and analyzed onsite, on the same day as collection.
Total coliform and culturable E. coli analyses
Samples (100 ml) were pretreated with sodium thiosulfate (0.1 ml of 3% solution) to remove any potential chlorine residuals and processed by membrane filtration technique onsite within 6 h of collection (APHA 2017). Sachet water was filtered under aseptic conditions (i.e., all surfaces were treated with 10% bleach prior to and after analyses, all forceps were wiped with alcohol tissues and flame sterilized). Sterile disposable filtration units (Pall MicroFunnel, NY) with 0.45 μm pore size membrane filters were used for filtration, and all filters were placed on the Endo Nutrient Pad System (Sartorius, Gottingen, Germany). These plates were incubated at 18–24 h at 36 ± 2 °C. Dark to light red colonies are counted as TC, and colonies with a metallic sheen were counted as E. coli. Bottled water purchased from the USA was used as the negative control for each batch of filtration. All results were reported as CFU/100 ml. Plates with no growth were reported as below detection limit (<1 CFU/100 ml).
Nucleic acid extraction
Another set of samples (100 ml) was filtered in aseptic conditions onsite as described above. Sterile filtration units (Pall MicroFunnel, NY) with 0.4 μm pore size polycarbonate membrane filters were used for this procedure. Upon filtration, all filters were kept in a freezer until the day of departure and transported on ice to the Jiann-Ping Hsu College of Public Health Core Laboratory in the USA. These filters were then immediately stored at −80 °C until nucleic acid extraction.
DNA was extracted directly from each filter by the crude extraction method (USEPA 2012). The cells were lysed in a bead mill for 60 s at 5,000 rpm, and the debris were removed by centrifugation (Haugland et al. 2005). These extracts were immediately used for the quantification of target genes.
Quantitative polymerase chain reaction
Standard curves were prepared by extracting DNA from E. coli (ATCC 25922™), and a plasmid is used for the HF183 marker as described previously (Chern et al. 2009; Green et al. 2014). Reagent mixes were prepared by combining 12.5 μl of TaqMan® Environmental Master Mix (Life Technologies, Thermo Scientific, Grand Island, NY), 2.5 μl of 2 mg/ml bovine serum albumin, 1 μM of each primer, and 80 μM of probes for each reaction. Amplification occurred with an initial starting temperature at 50 °C for 2 min followed by 95 °C for 10 min, then 45 cycles of 95 °C for 15 s and 56 °C for 1 min. All amplification reactions were carried out with a StepOnePlus™ thermocycler (Life Technologies, Thermo Scientific, Grand Island, NY), and results were reported as copies/100 ml. For E. coli, the inhibition score was detected from the sample processing control cycle threshold values in undiluted samples, as described in Method C (Aw et al. 2019). An internal amplification control was used to observe any potential inhibition in undiluted samples during the human-associated HF183 marker analysis (Green et al. 2014). For each quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) run, calibrators and a no-template control were run along with the samples for quality assurance and quality control. The detection limit for both qPCR assays was 100 copies/100 ml.
Statistical analysis
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
This study examined total coliform, E. coli, and a human-associated source tracking marker (Bacteroides HF183) occurrence in sachet water from Ghana. Overall, TC counts were positive for 76 of the samples out of 87 (87%). The TC counts presented high variability with a maximum count reaching 800 CFU/100 ml (Table 1). When compared among brands, TC counts were significantly different from each other (p < 0.0001) (Table 2). Culturable E. coli was not detected in any of the samples (Table 1). The absence of E. coli is in agreement with Stoler et al. (2014), as they reported low counts of fecal indicator bacteria (FIB) but high total heterotrophic bacteria in many brands regardless of their perceived quality within the communities.
Descriptive statistics of microbiological parameters tested in sachet water
. | Number of samples (N)a . | Minimum . | Maximum . | Mean . | Standard deviation . |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total coliform (CFU/100 ml) | 87 | <1 | 800 | 35.6 | 96.00 |
E. coli (CFU/100 ml) | 87 | <1 | <1 | <1 | – |
E. coli 23S rDNA (copies/100 ml) | 175 | <100 | 1,503 | 172.5 | 284.35 |
HF183 (copies/100 ml) | 175 | <100 | <100 | – | – |
. | Number of samples (N)a . | Minimum . | Maximum . | Mean . | Standard deviation . |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total coliform (CFU/100 ml) | 87 | <1 | 800 | 35.6 | 96.00 |
E. coli (CFU/100 ml) | 87 | <1 | <1 | <1 | – |
E. coli 23S rDNA (copies/100 ml) | 175 | <100 | 1,503 | 172.5 | 284.35 |
HF183 (copies/100 ml) | 175 | <100 | <100 | – | – |
aMolecular data collected from 21 brands over the course of 2 years (2015 and 2016). Culture data (total coliform and E. coli CFU/100 ml) only collected in 2016 with a total of nine brands.
Comparison of total coliform counts by brand (n = 87)
. | Model 1: response total coliform . | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Variable . | Levels . | B . | Standard error . | Wald 95% confidence limits . | P-value . | |
Intercept | 4.7122 | 0.0316 | 4.6503 | 4.7742 | <.0001 | |
Brand (n) | Angel (10) | −0.5502 | 0.0506 | −0.6493 | −0.4511 | <.0001 |
Cool Pac (5) | −2.3599 | 0.1025 | −2.5609 | −2.1589 | <.0001 | |
Century (14) | −3.8121 | 0.2869 | −4.3743 | −3.2498 | <.0001 | |
Darkofresh (9) | −0.5516 | 0.0523 | −0.6540 | −0.4492 | <.0001 | |
Deep (15) | −1.5189 | 0.0714 | −1.6589 | −1.3789 | <.0001 | |
Ever Pac (12) | −1.4319 | 0.0643 | −1.5579 | −1.3059 | <.0001 | |
Kama (12) | −2.2889 | 0.0916 | −2.4684 | −2.1094 | <.0001 | |
Mobile (10) | −2.9596 | 0.1354 | −3.2249 | −2.6942 | <.0001 | |
Reference = Special Ice (14) | 0.0000 | 0.0000 | 0.0000 | 0.0000 | . |
. | Model 1: response total coliform . | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Variable . | Levels . | B . | Standard error . | Wald 95% confidence limits . | P-value . | |
Intercept | 4.7122 | 0.0316 | 4.6503 | 4.7742 | <.0001 | |
Brand (n) | Angel (10) | −0.5502 | 0.0506 | −0.6493 | −0.4511 | <.0001 |
Cool Pac (5) | −2.3599 | 0.1025 | −2.5609 | −2.1589 | <.0001 | |
Century (14) | −3.8121 | 0.2869 | −4.3743 | −3.2498 | <.0001 | |
Darkofresh (9) | −0.5516 | 0.0523 | −0.6540 | −0.4492 | <.0001 | |
Deep (15) | −1.5189 | 0.0714 | −1.6589 | −1.3789 | <.0001 | |
Ever Pac (12) | −1.4319 | 0.0643 | −1.5579 | −1.3059 | <.0001 | |
Kama (12) | −2.2889 | 0.0916 | −2.4684 | −2.1094 | <.0001 | |
Mobile (10) | −2.9596 | 0.1354 | −3.2249 | −2.6942 | <.0001 | |
Reference = Special Ice (14) | 0.0000 | 0.0000 | 0.0000 | 0.0000 | . |
E. coli 23S rDNA genes were positive in 44.6% of the samples (n = 175). The highest concentration was 3,166 copies/100 ml. E. coli gene copies in all 21 brands were also significantly different from each other (p < 0.0001; Table 3), indicating that the microbiological quality of sachet water varied among brands and even among different batches of the same brand. Detection of culturable TC and E. coli genes, but the absence of culturable E. coli, showed that, although during the time of analysis no live E. coli cells were detected, there were E. coli in these samples.
Comparison of E. coli 23S rDNA gene copy numbers by brand (n = 175)
. | Model 2: response E. coli 23S rDNA genes . | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Variable . | Levels . | B . | Standard error . | Wald 95% confidence limits . | P-value . | |
Intercept | 5.5084 | 0.0318 | 5.4460 | 5.5708 | <.0001 | |
Brand (n) | Angel (10) | −2.2237 | 0.0690 | −2.3589 | −2.0885 | <.0001 |
Aquafill (5) | −0.1962 | 0.0447 | −0.2838 | −0.1085 | <.0001 | |
Aspet (5) | −0.6135 | 0.0501 | −0.7117 | −0.5153 | <.0001 | |
Blue Sea (5) | −0.3820 | 0.0469 | −0.4740 | −0.2901 | <.0001 | |
Century (14) | −1.0063 | 0.0568 | −1.1177 | −0.8949 | <.0001 | |
Cool Pac (5) | 0.1716 | 0.0355 | 0.1021 | 0.2410 | <.0001 | |
Cool Pack (17) | −0.5195 | 0.0376 | −0.5932 | −0.4458 | <.0001 | |
Darkofresh (9) | −2.4377 | 0.0785 | −2.5917 | −2.2838 | <.0001 | |
Deep (15) | −0.5826 | 0.0387 | −0.6584 | −0.5067 | <.0001 | |
Ever Pac (12) | −2.3657 | 0.0679 | −2.4987 | −2.2326 | <.0001 | |
First Klass (5) | −0.4183 | 0.0474 | −0.5112 | −0.3255 | <.0001 | |
Glory (5) | −0.3904 | 0.0470 | −0.4825 | −0.2982 | <.0001 | |
Ice Pak (4) | −0.9183 | 0.0596 | −1.0351 | −0.8015 | <.0001 | |
JAF Lover (5) | −0.2021 | 0.0448 | −0.2899 | −0.1143 | <.0001 | |
Kama (12) | −2.1268 | 0.0620 | −2.2484 | −2.0053 | <.0001 | |
Life Natural (5) | −0.6135 | 0.0501 | −0.7117 | −0.5153 | <.0001 | |
Mobile (10) | −2.3729 | 0.0732 | −2.5164 | −2.2294 | <.0001 | |
NSUPA (5) | 0.9054 | 0.0366 | 0.8336 | 0.9772 | <.0001 | |
Special Ice (14) | −1.5822 | 0.0492 | −1.6786 | −1.4857 | <.0001 | |
Standard (9) | −0.1042 | 0.0389 | −0.1804 | −0.0280 | 0.0074 | |
Reference = Tepco (4) | 0.0000 | 0.0000 | 0.0000 | 0.0000 |
. | Model 2: response E. coli 23S rDNA genes . | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Variable . | Levels . | B . | Standard error . | Wald 95% confidence limits . | P-value . | |
Intercept | 5.5084 | 0.0318 | 5.4460 | 5.5708 | <.0001 | |
Brand (n) | Angel (10) | −2.2237 | 0.0690 | −2.3589 | −2.0885 | <.0001 |
Aquafill (5) | −0.1962 | 0.0447 | −0.2838 | −0.1085 | <.0001 | |
Aspet (5) | −0.6135 | 0.0501 | −0.7117 | −0.5153 | <.0001 | |
Blue Sea (5) | −0.3820 | 0.0469 | −0.4740 | −0.2901 | <.0001 | |
Century (14) | −1.0063 | 0.0568 | −1.1177 | −0.8949 | <.0001 | |
Cool Pac (5) | 0.1716 | 0.0355 | 0.1021 | 0.2410 | <.0001 | |
Cool Pack (17) | −0.5195 | 0.0376 | −0.5932 | −0.4458 | <.0001 | |
Darkofresh (9) | −2.4377 | 0.0785 | −2.5917 | −2.2838 | <.0001 | |
Deep (15) | −0.5826 | 0.0387 | −0.6584 | −0.5067 | <.0001 | |
Ever Pac (12) | −2.3657 | 0.0679 | −2.4987 | −2.2326 | <.0001 | |
First Klass (5) | −0.4183 | 0.0474 | −0.5112 | −0.3255 | <.0001 | |
Glory (5) | −0.3904 | 0.0470 | −0.4825 | −0.2982 | <.0001 | |
Ice Pak (4) | −0.9183 | 0.0596 | −1.0351 | −0.8015 | <.0001 | |
JAF Lover (5) | −0.2021 | 0.0448 | −0.2899 | −0.1143 | <.0001 | |
Kama (12) | −2.1268 | 0.0620 | −2.2484 | −2.0053 | <.0001 | |
Life Natural (5) | −0.6135 | 0.0501 | −0.7117 | −0.5153 | <.0001 | |
Mobile (10) | −2.3729 | 0.0732 | −2.5164 | −2.2294 | <.0001 | |
NSUPA (5) | 0.9054 | 0.0366 | 0.8336 | 0.9772 | <.0001 | |
Special Ice (14) | −1.5822 | 0.0492 | −1.6786 | −1.4857 | <.0001 | |
Standard (9) | −0.1042 | 0.0389 | −0.1804 | −0.0280 | 0.0074 | |
Reference = Tepco (4) | 0.0000 | 0.0000 | 0.0000 | 0.0000 |
Summary of information presented on sachet labels
Characteristics . | (N = 21) n (%) . |
---|---|
Definition | |
Drinking water | 15 (71.4) |
Mineral water | 6 (28.6) |
Source of water | |
Ground water | 4 (19.0) |
Not available | 17 (81.0) |
Company name and address | |
Yes | 21 (100) |
Country of origin | |
Ghana | 21 (100) |
Mark of conformity | |
GSB | 16 (76.2) |
No | 5 (23.8) |
Othera | 0 (0) |
Registration number | |
Yes | 20 (95.2) |
No | 1 (4.8) |
Batch number | |
Yes | 17 (81.0) |
No | 4 (19.0) |
Date of manufacture | |
Yes | 17 (81.0) |
No | 4 (19.0) |
Best before | |
Yes | 21 (100) |
No | 0 (0) |
Storage instructions | |
Yes | 13 (61.9) |
No | 8 (38.1) |
Treatment | |
Yes | 6 (28.6) |
No | 15 (71.4) |
Characteristics . | (N = 21) n (%) . |
---|---|
Definition | |
Drinking water | 15 (71.4) |
Mineral water | 6 (28.6) |
Source of water | |
Ground water | 4 (19.0) |
Not available | 17 (81.0) |
Company name and address | |
Yes | 21 (100) |
Country of origin | |
Ghana | 21 (100) |
Mark of conformity | |
GSB | 16 (76.2) |
No | 5 (23.8) |
Othera | 0 (0) |
Registration number | |
Yes | 20 (95.2) |
No | 1 (4.8) |
Batch number | |
Yes | 17 (81.0) |
No | 4 (19.0) |
Date of manufacture | |
Yes | 17 (81.0) |
No | 4 (19.0) |
Best before | |
Yes | 21 (100) |
No | 0 (0) |
Storage instructions | |
Yes | 13 (61.9) |
No | 8 (38.1) |
Treatment | |
Yes | 6 (28.6) |
No | 15 (71.4) |
GSB: Ghana Standards Board.
aOther: Association of Sachet Water Producers.
One possible explanation of these results is that bacteria can enter a viable but nonculturable (VBNC) stage under stress conditions (Roszak & Colwell 1987), where bacteria lose their ability to form colonies on solid media (Rozen & Belkin 2001). Recent studies showed that VBNC can be triggered by prolonged solar radiation exposure (Jozić & Šolić 2017; Sagarduy et al. 2019) or chlorination (Chen et al. 2018), where they can still display pathogenicity (Zhang et al. 2015). During our study, we often observed that sachet water was transported to the market vendors from other locations, during which they may have been exposed to direct sunlight resulting in the inactivation of the existing live E. coli cells in these packages. qPCR allows for quantifying all E. coli DNA from live and dead cells as well as free-floating DNA. It is known that the time to decay in 90% of the initial concentrations of E. coli cells (T90) in freshwater stored at ambient temperature can be short and up to 5 days (Noble et al. 2004), whereas E. coli genes T90 vary from 6 to 12 days (Klein et al. 2011; Brooks et al. 2015). The absence of E. coli cells but frequent detection of their genes in our study may be due to differences in the persistence of cells versus genes in the environment.
Another advantage of using qPCR in this study was the ability to test for the presence of the human-associated fecal contamination. Our results showed that all samples were negative for the HF183 marker; a universal indicator of human fecal contamination in water (Mayer et al. 2018). The absence of this marker in the sachet samples indicated that the source for TC cells and E. coli genes could have originated from non-human sources.
Based on these findings, one potential source of contamination can be biofilms cross-contaminating these packages during the filling process. Biofilms produced by a homogenous group of bacterial communities can occur in distribution systems when disinfection practices are poorly executed (Bertelli et al. 2018). According to the WHO (2017a) guidelines for drinking water, TC should be used to assess the bacteriological and biofilm contamination in distribution systems. Because there would have been no TC growth in a recently disinfected system, detecting high concentrations of this group of bacteria in many of these brands indicates the poor treatment, which might have led to biofilm growth that sustained TC survival within the pipelines. Our findings were supported by Stoler et al. (2015b) who reported that 41% of the sachet samples collected from Accra were positive for Pseudomonas aeruginosa, a microorganism that thrives in distribution system biofilms.
The information on the sachet bags were also examined (Table 4). The majority (78%) of the labels had no information on treatment. The sources of the water used for manufacturing were not mentioned in the majority (89%) of the samples. Almost 30% of the brands tested had no batch number nor date of manufacture. The quality of sachet water and how it is classified can change a nation's investment on water infrastructure and associated health policies. Vedachalam et al. (2017) analyzed the positive and negative outcomes of classifying sachet water as an improved or unimproved source of drinking water and concluded that, no matter how sachet water is classified, it should serve to advance public health. WHO already recognizes the intensive use of sachet water in Ghana and classifies as an improved water source in their recent report based on extensive household use (WHO 2017b). Our study shows that even though there has been a significant improvement in sachet water quality, such as not detecting any live E. coli cells, there still seem to be problems related to sachet production. Further studies are needed to address challenges related to the sachet manufacturing process, in particular, a comprehensive assessment of industrial hygiene practices across all brands.
CONCLUSIONS
To our knowledge, this is the first study that applies a rapid molecular method (MST) to investigate human-associated markers in sachet water. Based on our findings, more stringent treatment regulations at the manufacturing stage and standards compliance of the packages are needed to ensure the provision of safe drinking water.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
The authors thank Kevin Ofori-Gyawu, Mautor Awuma, and Ishmael Tibori and students from the Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology – School of Medicine and Dentistry assisting with sample collection. The mention of brands reported herein is not an endorsement of these products.
FINANCIAL SUPPORT
This project was funded by the Georgia Southern University Office of Research and Economic Development.
DISCLOSURE STATEMENT
There are no competing interests for the present study, financial or otherwise.