Lack of access to basic sanitation services remains a global challenge, particularly in developing countries like Ethiopia. This study used weighted household data from the Ethiopian Demographic and Health Survey to investigate the spatiotemporal trends and patterns of unmet basic sanitation services from 2011 to 2019. STATA version 17, ArcGIS Pro and SatScan for non-spatial and spatial analysis. The results showed that urban areas decreased from 80.11% (2011) to 72.85% (2019), while rural areas remained stable at 94.03% (2011) and 93.98% (2019). Regional inequalities were evident, with Gambella increasing from 89.79 to 97.11%. The analysis confirmed non-random patterns with significant clusters of unmet basic sanitation needs. In 2011, primary clusters included East Gambella, SNNPs, Sidama, South West Ethiopia, West and South Oromia, and Western Somali regions (LLR = 91.77, p<0.001). By 2016, severe challenges shifted to Amhara and Benishangul Gumuz regions (LLR = 192.23, p,0.001). Despite some progress in 2019, clusters persisted in Southern Nations, Nationalities, and Peoples' Region, South West Ethiopia, Sidama, West Oromia, Gambella, and Benishangul-Gumuz (LLR = 74.39, p,0.001). The study indicates systemic disparities in Ethiopia's access to basic sanitation services, emphasizing the need for targeted interventions, improved resource allocation, and strategic sanitation initiatives.

  • This study analyzes spatiotemporal trends and patterns of unmet basic sanitation service needs in Ethiopia (2011–2019) using EDHS data, applying spatial analysis and SaTScan to identify hotspots and significant clusters of unmet needs.

  • Unlike previous studies, it maps persistent unmet sanitation inequalities over time and space. Findings support SDG 6 and provide crucial evidence for targeted interventions to improve access to basic sanitation services in Ethiopia.

EDHS

Ethiopian Demographic and Health Survey

EPHC

Ethiopian Population and Housing Census

CLTS

Community-Led Total Sanitation

CSA

Central Statistics Agency

HH

household

LLR

likelihood ratio

RR

relative risk

SDG

sustainable development goals

SNNPR

Southern Nations, Nationalities, and Peoples' Region

WHO

World Health Organization

Access to basic sanitation service is needed for the improvement of the health of the population as well as the attainment of the sustainable development goals (SDGs) with focus on SDG 6 which targets to ensure adequate and sustainable management of water and sanitation for all by 2030. Despite the global improvement, Sub-Saharan Africa including Ethiopia still has one of the lowest accesses to sanitation services, where a large part of the population has no access to basic sanitation services (Ohwo & Agusomu 2018; Bishoge 2021; Zerbo et al. 2021; Okesanya et al. 2024). This has a number of negative impacts on public health including a high incidence of sanitation-related diseases and under-five mortality (Prüss et al. 2002; Fewtrell et al. 2005; Prüss-Ustün et al. 2019; WHO 2020; UNICEF WHO 2021).

Lack of access to basic sanitation services is still a major worldwide concern particularly in the developing nations (Moe & Rheingans 2006). As of 2020, 3.6 billion people around the world did not have access to safely managed sanitation and the problem is most acute in Sub-Saharan Africa including Ethiopia (UNICEF, WHO 2021). The previous findings of the studies indicated that access to basic sanitation services is not homogeneous within and between countries as well as over different periods (Heijnen et al. 2014; Prüss-Ustün et al. 2014; UNICEF, WHO 2021). The studies conducted on geospatial variations and inequalities in Sub-Saharan Africa revealed that there were significant differences in the geography of access to sanitation services and needs for specific strategies (Azage et al. 2020; Pullan et al. 2014; Yu et al. 2014).

Evidence from the 2016 Ethiopian Demographic and Health Survey (EDHS) and the Multiple Indicator Cluster Surveys in Vietnam (2000–2011) showed that the lack of improved sanitation facilities tends to be spatially clustered and was closely linked to various socio-economic and environmental factors (Tuyet-Hanh et al. 2016; Azage et al. 2020). In Ethiopia, research using spatial modeling revealed that regions with lower access to sanitation services were also hotspots for waterborne diseases such as diarrhea (Belay & Andualem 2022; Demsash et al. 2023).

Research conducted in different regions of Ethiopia indicates that the lack of basic sanitation services exhibits substantial variability across study settings and over time. Socio-economic disparities, urban-rural differences, and environmental conditions are key factors driving these patterns (Alemu et al. 2023a; Demsash et al. 2023). A study in Ethiopia revealed that regions with higher poverty rates and limited access to water supply infrastructure were more likely to experience a lack of sanitation services (Alemu et al. 2024; Keleb et al. 2024; Mekonnen et al. 2024). Similarly, environmental and climatic factors also play a role in significant role in access to basic sanitation across the country (Abrams et al. 2021).

In Ethiopia, several initiatives have been implemented to improve access to basic sanitation services and the health consequences of sanitation deficiencies. For example, one of the major initiatives is the Health Extension Program, which began in 2004. This program aims to improve the sanitary condition of households by providing health extension services to reducing sanitation-associated diseases such as diarrhea (Workie & Ramana 2013; Alemu et al. 2023b; Girma et al. 2024). Despite these efforts, lack of access to basic sanitation services remains a significant public health challenge, contributing to preventable diseases and mortality, especially among vulnerable populations (Mills & Cumming 2016; Gessese et al. 2023; Girma et al. 2024; Sahiledengle et al. 2024).

As a result, this study aims to answer the following research questions: (1) What are the spatiotemporal trends in unmet sanitation services needs in Ethiopia from 2011 to 2019? (2) What regional disparities exist, and how have they evolved over time? The study's findings are significant because they can help inform targeted interventions and design evidence-based strategies to improve public and environmental health outcomes. Furthermore, these findings can inform policy decisions aimed at promoting healthier communities, achieving the SDGs, and closing gaps in access to basic sanitation services.

Study design, setting, and period

A population-based cross-sectional study design was used to investigate and identify spatial trends and patterns of unmet basic sanitation services in Ethiopia. This study used data from 16,702 households in the 2011 EDHS, 16,650 households in the 2016 EDHS, and 8,663 households in the 2019 EDHS, all obtained from the https://www.dhsprogram.com/data/dataset_admin/login_main.cfm website. These surveys are population-based and nationally representative, with large sample sizes collected at different points in time.

The study is conducted in Ethiopia (3°–14°N and 33°–48°E), located at the eastern tip of Africa (Dwivedi et al. 2005). The country covers an area of 1.1 million square kilometers and has remarkable geographical diversity, with elevations ranging from 4,550 m above sea level in the Ethiopian Highlands to 110 m below sea level in the Afar Depression. As of 2021 Ethiopia is administratively divided into two administrative cities (Addis Ababa and Dire Dawa) and eleven regional states: Tigray, Afar, Amhara, Oromia, Somali, Benishangul-Gumuz, Sidama, South West Ethiopia Southern Nations, Nationalities, and Peoples' Region (SNNPR), Gambella, and Harari, which are further subdivided into 68 zones, 817 districts, and 16,253 kebeles (the smallest local administrative units). Ethiopia's population has grown significantly over time, from 53.5 million in the 1994 census to 114,968,588 in 2020, with a fertility rate of 4.3 (Admassu et al. 2013; Genet 2020).

Source population

The source population for this study was all households in Ethiopia, while households in the selected enumeration areas (EAs) were the study population.

Sample size and sampling techniques

All EDHS samples were selected using a two-stage stratified cluster sampling procedure. Sampling weights were calculated to adjust survey data to make it representative of the target population. In 2011 EDHS, 624 EAs (Dearden et al. 2017) were selected comprising 187 urban and 437 rural areas (Central Statistics Agency, ICF International Calverton 2012), the 2016 EDHS covered 645 EAs (202 urban and 443 rural) (Central Statistics Agency, ICF International Calverton 2017), and the 2019 EDHS included 305 EAs (93 urban and 212 rural) (Ethiopian Public Health Institute and Federal Ministry of Health 2020). These EAs were chosen using systematic sampling with probability proportional to size.

In the second stage of selection, a fixed number of 30 households per cluster were randomly chosen from a newly created household list.

Data collection tools and variables

To measure basic sanitation services, we aligned our indicators/variables collected during EDHS surveys with the WHO/UNICEF Joint Monitoring Program (JMP) definitions which enhances comparability across time and geography (UNICEF, WHO 2021). Specifically, a household was considered to have unmet or lack of access to basic sanitation services, if it did not use unshared flush or pour flush systems, septic tanks, pit latrines, or composting toilets and did not know where excreta is disposed or if the household used any of the following unimproved sanitation facility types including flush somewhere else; pit latrines without slabs; open pits and buckets; hanging toilets; or open field defecation, including no facility, bush, or field, and shared improved sanitation facilities (UNICEF, WHO 2018, 2021).

Data collection process

The data collection for the EDHS was made possible by a collaborative effort involving Ethiopian Public Health Institute investigators, a technical specialist from an Information Consulting Firm, an advisor, and representatives from organizations such as the Central Statistics Agency, the Federal Ministry of Health, the World Bank, and USAID (Dearden et al. 2017). Data on sanitation access was collected at the household level, with respondents (typically heads of households or knowledgeable household members) reporting on the type of sanitation facilities used by household members. The data were self-reported and permission-based observation through trained data collectors and supervisors. This may introduce potential biases such as recall error and social desirability bias especially in cases where respondents may overstate facility use or underreport sharing with other households. Location data, including latitude and longitude coordinates, were also collected from the selected EAs (Central Statistics Agency ICF International Calverton 2012, 2017; Ethiopian Public Health Institute and Federal Ministry of Health 2020).

Data management and statistical analysis

Data cleaning, variable recoding and labeling, weighting, processing and data summary for non-spatial analysis were conducted using STATA version 17 and R version 4.4.2 software. Spatial statistics were analyzed using Geographical Information System (ArcGIS Pro version 2.8) software, while Sat Scan version 10.2.5 was used for spatial scanning and identifying clusters. Descriptive statistics, encompassing frequencies with percentages were reported, and the results were presented with tables and graphs.

Spatial autocorrelation and hotspot analysis

Global Moran's I statistic was applied to assess whether unmet basic sanitation service patterns in the study area were dispersed, clustered, or randomly distributed (Cortés et al. 2020; García-Pérez 2022). Moran's I values close to −1 indicate lack of access to basic sanitation services dispersion, while values close to +1 suggest basic sanitation clustering, and values around 0 imply random distribution. A statistically significant Moran's I (p < 0.05) leads to the rejection of the null hypothesis, indicating the presence of spatial autocorrelation (Demsash et al. 2023; Roy 2023; Biswas et al. 2024).

To investigate local-level clustering of unmet basic sanitation services, Anselin Local Moran's I was employed (Song & Kulldorff 2003; Isazade et al. 2023; Gedamu et al. 2024). This measure determines whether clusters of high values (high–high) or low values (low–low) exist, or if there are negatively correlated clusters (high–low or low–high). It also identifies outliers, where a high value is surrounded by predominantly low values, or a low value is surrounded by high values (Zhang et al. 2008; Sánchez-Martín et al. 2019; Wong 2021). A positive value for Moran's I indicates that a case is surrounded by similar values, forming part of a cluster, while a negative value suggests that a case is surrounded by dissimilar values, making it an outlier (Negreiros et al. 2010; Tsui et al. 2022).

Hotspot analysis was carried out to determine how spatial autocorrelation varies across the study area by computing the Gi* statistic at each location (Abdulhafedh 2017). The presence of a statistically significant spatial pattern, warranting further exploration of the underlying causes. Statistical output with a high Gi* indicates a ‘hotspot,’ whereas a low Gi* value signifies a ‘cold spot’ (Anselin et al. 2010; Naish & Tong 2014).

Spatial scan statistical analysis and cluster detection

The Spatial Scan statistical method is widely recommended for its effectiveness in detecting local clusters, offering higher power compared to other spatial statistical methods (Li et al. 2011; French et al. 2022). This technique was used to test for the presence of statistically significant spatial hotspots or clusters of unmet basic sanitation services using Kuldorff's SatScan version 10.2.5 software The method utilizes a scanning window that moves across the study area (Block 2007; Coleman et al. 2009). Household with lack of access to basic sanitation services were classified as cases, while those with access to basic sanitation services were considered controls, fitting a Bernoulli model. The number of cases in each location followed a Bernoulli distribution.

The default maximum spatial cluster size of <50% of the population was applied, which allowed for the detection of both small and large clusters while excluding those that exceeded the maximum size. For each potential cluster, a likelihood ratio test statistic was used to assess whether the observed number of cases within the cluster was significantly higher than expected. Primary and secondary clusters were identified, assigned p-values, and ranked based on their likelihood ratio tests, using 999 Monte Carlo replications (Alemu et al. 2014).

Urban-rural trends in access to basic sanitation services in Ethiopia

Access to basic sanitation services in urban areas improved gradually from 19.89% (2011) to 27.15% (2019), whereas rural areas showed limited improvement from 5.97% (2011) to 6.02% (2019). Nationally, basic sanitation access increased modestly from 10.23% (2011) to 12.47% (2019), primarily driven by urban progress (Figure 1).
Figure 1

Urban, rural, and national trends in unmet basic sanitation services in Ethiopia from 2011 to 2019.

Figure 1

Urban, rural, and national trends in unmet basic sanitation services in Ethiopia from 2011 to 2019.

Close modal

Proportion of lack of access to basic sanitation services in Ethiopia by regions

Addis Ababa, the capital city of the country, reduced the proportion of households without basic sanitation from 81.3% in 2011 to 58.69% in 2019, while Dire Dawa and Harari also exhibited steady declines. However, disparities remain evident, as some regions, such as Gambella indicated an increase from 89.79% in 2011 to 97.11% in 2019. Similarly, regions like Benishangul-Gumuz showed minimal improvement over the years. The Amhara region had a dramatic increment of unmet basic sanitation services from 88.56% in 2011 to 98.37% in 2016, before marginally improving to 89.77% in 2019 demonstrating continuing major issues despite modest progress. Consistently high levels of unmet basic sanitation services are observed in regions like Afar, Gambella and Oromia. The Southern Nations, Nationalities, and Peoples Region (SNNP) achieved gradual progress, reducing the proportion of households lacking basic sanitation access from 93.69% in 2011 to 92.63% in 2019 (Figure 2).
Figure 2

Proportion of lack of access to basic sanitation service trends overtime across regions in Ethiopia, 2011, 2016, and 2019.

Figure 2

Proportion of lack of access to basic sanitation service trends overtime across regions in Ethiopia, 2011, 2016, and 2019.

Close modal

The spatial patterns of unmet basic sanitation services

Positive spatial autocorrelation (Moran's I: 0.32, p < 0.001) indicated significant clustering of lack of basic sanitation services across all survey years. In 2011, Moran's I was 1.2327 (Z-score: 3.36, p < 0.001), demonstrating significant clustering. Similar patterns were observed in 2016 (Moran's I: 1.2327, Z-score: 3.49, p < 0.001) and 2019 (Moran's I: 1.2327, Z-score: 3.67, p < 0.001), with increasing Z-scores highlighting stronger clustering over time. These results consistently confirmed that spatial patterns of unmet basic sanitation services were non-random and significantly clustered (Figure 3).
Figure 3

Illustration of spatial autocorrelations of unmet basic sanitation services using Moran's index of EDHS 2011, 2016, and 2019 with differentiating random, clustered, and dispersed distributions with their statistical significance.

Figure 3

Illustration of spatial autocorrelations of unmet basic sanitation services using Moran's index of EDHS 2011, 2016, and 2019 with differentiating random, clustered, and dispersed distributions with their statistical significance.

Close modal

Identification of hotspots and cold spots across regions

The hotspot graphs illustrate the spatial analysis of geographical variations in lack of access to basic sanitation services in Ethiopia for the years 2011, 2016, and 2019. These maps highlight areas where the lack of sanitation access is significantly higher (hotspots) or lower (cold spots) providing critical insights into regional inequalities. In 2011, the hotspots (likely marked in red) reveal regions with severe basic sanitation inaccessibility.

By 2016, the distribution of hotspots becomes more extensive, with larger and more intense clusters indicating a worsening situation in Amhara, Benishangul-Gumuz and Gambella regions. In 2019, the hotspot analysis showed some improvement, with a reduction in the intensity and extent of high-priority areas compared to 2016. However, significant hotspots persist, particularly some parts of Amhara, Oromia, Benishangul-Gumuz, Gambella and SNNPs indicating that challenges in these regions remain unresolved (Figure 4).
Figure 4

Hotspot analysis trends of unmeet basic sanitation services in Ethiopia using EDHS 2011, 2016, and 2019.

Figure 4

Hotspot analysis trends of unmeet basic sanitation services in Ethiopia using EDHS 2011, 2016, and 2019.

Close modal

Spatial cluster analysis results

The cluster analysis result found significant geographic clusters of unmet basic sanitation services in 2011, 2016, and 2019 with high-risk zones (Figure 5). In 2011, four clusters were identified with primary cluster contained 187 EAs with a radius of 494.77 km (Salifu & Darko-Mensah 2008), centered at coordinates (5.00 N, 37.00 E). This cluster includes 7,488 households, of which 7,124 lacked basic sanitation access with a relative risk (RR) of 1.06, showing a 6% greater risk than households with access to basic sanitation services. In 2011, other clusters were smaller with radii ranging from 0 to 111.13 km and EAs ranging from 5 to 32. These clusters displayed RRs of 1.05–1.08, with log-likelihood ratios (LLR) of 16.04–9.95 confirming their statistical significance (p < 0.001).
Figure 5

SatScan analysis of unmet basic sanitation services in Ethiopia: spatial clustering trends from 2011 to 2019.

Figure 5

SatScan analysis of unmet basic sanitation services in Ethiopia: spatial clustering trends from 2011 to 2019.

Close modal

This study finding revealed more widespread and overlapping clusters in 2016, indicating a potential interaction of different risk factors. The primary cluster covered 109 EAs and had a radius of 247.73 km, centered at (11.00 N, 37.00 E), with 4,591 households and RR of 1.08. Secondary clusters within the primary cluster also showed statistically significant risk with RRs of 1.07 and LLR values up to 48.33 (p < 0.001). Another distinct secondary cluster in 2016 covered 13 EAs over a radius of 222.25 km, centered at (5.00 N, 40.00 E), with an RR of 1.07.

The 2019 clusters showed similar patterns, but with higher relative risks, indicating that situations in certain places were worsened. The primary cluster encompassed 121 EAs with a radius of 468.85 km, centered at (7.00 N, 35.00 E). This cluster includes 4,004 households, with 3,766 lacking basic sanitation access and RR of 1.09, indicating a 9% greater risk. In 2019, secondary clusters varied from 9 to 53 EAs, with radii of 108.70–398.59 km and RRs of 1.07–1.09 (Table 1).

Table 1

Significant spatial clusters of unmet basic sanitation services from EDHS 2011, 2016, and 2019, Ethiopia

YearClustersEnumeration areas detectedCoordinate/radiuspopulationCases/not basicRRLLRP value
2011 8, 105, 202, 239, 252, 284, 357, 552, 610, 121, 222, 307, 320, 382, 408, 466, 570, 321, 583, 135, 283, 342, 427, 598, 351, 518, 646, 75, 233, 56, 93, 130, 14, 143, 152, 16, 242, 273, 282, 303, 360, 378, 391, 412, 413, 435, 513, 526, 534, 55, 558, 73, 81, 207, 243, 315, 364, 389, 409, 457, 477, 145, 147, 172, 176, 198, 234, 310, 344, 42, 541, 107, 160, 223, 30, 327, 368, 511, 545, 559, 631, 639, 259, 277, 301, 390, 405, 520, 580, 350, 425, 5, 10, 108, 12, 132, 149, 184, 248, 27, 337, 47, 472, 548, 605, 88, 97, 404, 642, 377, 199, 37, 442,116, 125, 206, 267, 339, 354, 375, 396, 586, 240, 346, 113, 254, 257, 262, 325, 528, 649, 83, 264, 324, 395, 475, 490, 505, 562, 578, 607, 619, 17, 291, 402, 471, 158, 161, 185, 196, 25, 261, 383, 422, 447, 454, 487, 492, 530, 536, 547, 588, 624, 633, 648, 187, 279 (5.00 N, 37.00 E)/494.77 km 7488 7124 1.06 91.77 <0.001 
 293, 33, 366, 392, 414, 420, 478, 499, 643, 68, 119, 171, 372, 407, 555, 421, 423, 509, 514, 577, 80, 133, 231, 296, 418, 445, 617, 65, 67, 79, 84, 99 (11.00 N, 40.00E)/111.13 km 864 835 1.05 16.04 <0.001 
 183, 122, 154, 460, 637 (13.00 N, 36.00 E)/108.28 km 381 373 1.06 12.37 <0.001 
 229, 29, 437 (10.00 N, 37.00 E)/0 km 196 194 1.08 9.95 0.002 
2016 109, 3, 361, 375, 382, 516, 120, 167, 206, 24, 38, 403, 429, 456, 137, 150, 183, 246, 35, 36, 364, 386, 415, 498, 515, 533, 541, 548, 559, 602, 615, 474, 494, 169, 292, 431, 73, 132, 158, 163, 199, 512, 259, 218, 229, 350, 482, 531, 184, 244, 320, 349, 70, 88, 10, 176, 354, 460, 545, 616, 617, 256, 457, 234, 280, 294, 399, 279, 296, 638, 401, 478, 591, 627, 66, 124, 165, 17, 203, 209, 317, 324, 335, 374, 407, 409, 416, 433, 563, 569, 581, 595, 6, 621, 65, 267, 423, 510, 572, 152, 312, 322, 327, 425, 628, 640, 80, 52, 118, 23, 485, 517, 161, 304 (11.00N, 37.00 E)/247.73 km 4591 4538 1.08 192.23 <0.001 
 109, 3, 361, 375, 382, 516, 120, 167, 206, 24, 38, 403, 429, 456,137, 150, 183, 246, 35, 36, 364, 386, 415, 498, 515, 533, 541, 548, 559, 602, 615 (11.00N, 37.00 E)/109.08 km 940 936 1.07 48.33 <0.001 
 279, 296, 638, 152, 312, 322, 327, 425, 628, 640, 80, 52 (13.00N, 37.00E)/ 108.28 km 754 751 1.07 39.09 <0.001 
 377, 394, 7, 316, 34, 422, 480, 601, 82, 556, 289, 452, 472 (5.00 N, 40.00 E)/222.25 km 632 630 1.07 34.15 <0.001 
 267, 423, 510, 572, 102, 201, 283, 295, 310, 336, 39, 484, 564, 624, 637, 218, 229, 350, 482, 531 (10.00N, 39.00 E)/109.44 km 859 845 1.05 23.44 <0.001 
 132, 158, 163, 199, 512, 169, 292, 431, 73, 401, 478, 591, 627, 66 (12.00 N, 38.00 E)/108.70 km 851 836 1.05 21.62 <0.001 
 234, 280, 294, 399, 118, 23, 485, 517, 161, 304, 474, 494 (9.00 N, 37.00E)/111.13 km 881 863 1.05 19.21 <0.001 
 438, 522, 524, 54, 562, 123, 213, 319 (8.00 N, 39.00 E)/110.04 km 616 605 1.05 15.29 <0.001 
 10, 176, 354, 460, 545, 616, 617 (11.00N, 39.00 E)/0 km 359 355 1.06 12.56 <0.001 
 10 266, 309, 435, 618, 104, 105, 106, 13, 233, 260, 270, 284,315, 343, 346, 370, 417, 426, 446, 507, 536, 567, 592, 603, 69, 193, 275, 643,114, 119, 219, 221, 231, 265, 291, 326, 448, 469, 47, 549, 593, 63, 175, 248, 462, 558, 168, 197, 243, 299, 371, 437, 459, 46, 465, 526, 552, 554, 395, 508, 124, 165, 17, 203, 209, 317, 324, 335, 374, 407,409, 416, 433, 563, 569, 581, 595, 6, 621, 65, 337 (8.00 N, 33.00 E)/313.13 km 590 574 1.04 8.53 0.011 
 11 115, 133, 157, 173, 179, 194, 212, 228, 238, 240, 257, 28, 288, 29, 321, 329, 357, 381, 383, 387, 393, 396, 397, 418, 419, 436, 44, 441, 443, 453, 454, 473, 483, 495, 500, 501, 513, 534, 557, 56, 566, 58, 580, 587, 60, 607, 610, 614, 622, 68 (9.00N, 42.00E)/0 km 365 357 1.05 7.14 0.043 
2019 200, 210, 215, 221, 222, 223, 224, 225, 226, 227, 228, 195, 201, 207,208, 209, 212, 213, 216, 206, 211, 214, 217, 218, 220, 229, 230, 194, 94, 97, 191, 196, 204, 118, 219, 91, 95, 96, 173, 192, 198, 199, 120,92, 93, 87, 98, 202, 178, 180, 182, 184, 189, 190, 147, 149, 150, 151, 152, 153, 154, 155, 156, 157, 86, 171, 174, 176, 177, 179, 203, 205, 115, 172, 188, 197, 89, 170, 164, 167, 168, 169, 193, 112, 119,117, 181, 183, 185, 186, 187, 159, 160, 116, 175, 90, 113, 114, 146,148, 158, 161, 162, 163, 165, 166, 52, 73, 99 (7.00 N, 35.00 E)/468.85 km 4004 3766 1.09 74.39 <0.001 
 54, 59, 74, 81, 84, 57, 58, 82, 83 (12.00N, 37.00E)/108.70 km 551 536 1.09 23.79 <0.001 
 138, 137, 136, 123, 135, 134, 142, 145, 140, 125, 141, 143, 122, 131, 132, 133, 144, 121, 129, 130, 124, 110, 111, 107, 108, 231, 232, 233, 234, 235, 236, 237, 238, 239, 240, 241, 242, 243, 244, 245, 246, 247, 248, 249, 250, 251, 252, 253, 254, 255, 102, 103, 104 (6.00 N, 43.00 E)/398.59 km 992 945 1.07 21.28 <0.001 
YearClustersEnumeration areas detectedCoordinate/radiuspopulationCases/not basicRRLLRP value
2011 8, 105, 202, 239, 252, 284, 357, 552, 610, 121, 222, 307, 320, 382, 408, 466, 570, 321, 583, 135, 283, 342, 427, 598, 351, 518, 646, 75, 233, 56, 93, 130, 14, 143, 152, 16, 242, 273, 282, 303, 360, 378, 391, 412, 413, 435, 513, 526, 534, 55, 558, 73, 81, 207, 243, 315, 364, 389, 409, 457, 477, 145, 147, 172, 176, 198, 234, 310, 344, 42, 541, 107, 160, 223, 30, 327, 368, 511, 545, 559, 631, 639, 259, 277, 301, 390, 405, 520, 580, 350, 425, 5, 10, 108, 12, 132, 149, 184, 248, 27, 337, 47, 472, 548, 605, 88, 97, 404, 642, 377, 199, 37, 442,116, 125, 206, 267, 339, 354, 375, 396, 586, 240, 346, 113, 254, 257, 262, 325, 528, 649, 83, 264, 324, 395, 475, 490, 505, 562, 578, 607, 619, 17, 291, 402, 471, 158, 161, 185, 196, 25, 261, 383, 422, 447, 454, 487, 492, 530, 536, 547, 588, 624, 633, 648, 187, 279 (5.00 N, 37.00 E)/494.77 km 7488 7124 1.06 91.77 <0.001 
 293, 33, 366, 392, 414, 420, 478, 499, 643, 68, 119, 171, 372, 407, 555, 421, 423, 509, 514, 577, 80, 133, 231, 296, 418, 445, 617, 65, 67, 79, 84, 99 (11.00 N, 40.00E)/111.13 km 864 835 1.05 16.04 <0.001 
 183, 122, 154, 460, 637 (13.00 N, 36.00 E)/108.28 km 381 373 1.06 12.37 <0.001 
 229, 29, 437 (10.00 N, 37.00 E)/0 km 196 194 1.08 9.95 0.002 
2016 109, 3, 361, 375, 382, 516, 120, 167, 206, 24, 38, 403, 429, 456, 137, 150, 183, 246, 35, 36, 364, 386, 415, 498, 515, 533, 541, 548, 559, 602, 615, 474, 494, 169, 292, 431, 73, 132, 158, 163, 199, 512, 259, 218, 229, 350, 482, 531, 184, 244, 320, 349, 70, 88, 10, 176, 354, 460, 545, 616, 617, 256, 457, 234, 280, 294, 399, 279, 296, 638, 401, 478, 591, 627, 66, 124, 165, 17, 203, 209, 317, 324, 335, 374, 407, 409, 416, 433, 563, 569, 581, 595, 6, 621, 65, 267, 423, 510, 572, 152, 312, 322, 327, 425, 628, 640, 80, 52, 118, 23, 485, 517, 161, 304 (11.00N, 37.00 E)/247.73 km 4591 4538 1.08 192.23 <0.001 
 109, 3, 361, 375, 382, 516, 120, 167, 206, 24, 38, 403, 429, 456,137, 150, 183, 246, 35, 36, 364, 386, 415, 498, 515, 533, 541, 548, 559, 602, 615 (11.00N, 37.00 E)/109.08 km 940 936 1.07 48.33 <0.001 
 279, 296, 638, 152, 312, 322, 327, 425, 628, 640, 80, 52 (13.00N, 37.00E)/ 108.28 km 754 751 1.07 39.09 <0.001 
 377, 394, 7, 316, 34, 422, 480, 601, 82, 556, 289, 452, 472 (5.00 N, 40.00 E)/222.25 km 632 630 1.07 34.15 <0.001 
 267, 423, 510, 572, 102, 201, 283, 295, 310, 336, 39, 484, 564, 624, 637, 218, 229, 350, 482, 531 (10.00N, 39.00 E)/109.44 km 859 845 1.05 23.44 <0.001 
 132, 158, 163, 199, 512, 169, 292, 431, 73, 401, 478, 591, 627, 66 (12.00 N, 38.00 E)/108.70 km 851 836 1.05 21.62 <0.001 
 234, 280, 294, 399, 118, 23, 485, 517, 161, 304, 474, 494 (9.00 N, 37.00E)/111.13 km 881 863 1.05 19.21 <0.001 
 438, 522, 524, 54, 562, 123, 213, 319 (8.00 N, 39.00 E)/110.04 km 616 605 1.05 15.29 <0.001 
 10, 176, 354, 460, 545, 616, 617 (11.00N, 39.00 E)/0 km 359 355 1.06 12.56 <0.001 
 10 266, 309, 435, 618, 104, 105, 106, 13, 233, 260, 270, 284,315, 343, 346, 370, 417, 426, 446, 507, 536, 567, 592, 603, 69, 193, 275, 643,114, 119, 219, 221, 231, 265, 291, 326, 448, 469, 47, 549, 593, 63, 175, 248, 462, 558, 168, 197, 243, 299, 371, 437, 459, 46, 465, 526, 552, 554, 395, 508, 124, 165, 17, 203, 209, 317, 324, 335, 374, 407,409, 416, 433, 563, 569, 581, 595, 6, 621, 65, 337 (8.00 N, 33.00 E)/313.13 km 590 574 1.04 8.53 0.011 
 11 115, 133, 157, 173, 179, 194, 212, 228, 238, 240, 257, 28, 288, 29, 321, 329, 357, 381, 383, 387, 393, 396, 397, 418, 419, 436, 44, 441, 443, 453, 454, 473, 483, 495, 500, 501, 513, 534, 557, 56, 566, 58, 580, 587, 60, 607, 610, 614, 622, 68 (9.00N, 42.00E)/0 km 365 357 1.05 7.14 0.043 
2019 200, 210, 215, 221, 222, 223, 224, 225, 226, 227, 228, 195, 201, 207,208, 209, 212, 213, 216, 206, 211, 214, 217, 218, 220, 229, 230, 194, 94, 97, 191, 196, 204, 118, 219, 91, 95, 96, 173, 192, 198, 199, 120,92, 93, 87, 98, 202, 178, 180, 182, 184, 189, 190, 147, 149, 150, 151, 152, 153, 154, 155, 156, 157, 86, 171, 174, 176, 177, 179, 203, 205, 115, 172, 188, 197, 89, 170, 164, 167, 168, 169, 193, 112, 119,117, 181, 183, 185, 186, 187, 159, 160, 116, 175, 90, 113, 114, 146,148, 158, 161, 162, 163, 165, 166, 52, 73, 99 (7.00 N, 35.00 E)/468.85 km 4004 3766 1.09 74.39 <0.001 
 54, 59, 74, 81, 84, 57, 58, 82, 83 (12.00N, 37.00E)/108.70 km 551 536 1.09 23.79 <0.001 
 138, 137, 136, 123, 135, 134, 142, 145, 140, 125, 141, 143, 122, 131, 132, 133, 144, 121, 129, 130, 124, 110, 111, 107, 108, 231, 232, 233, 234, 235, 236, 237, 238, 239, 240, 241, 242, 243, 244, 245, 246, 247, 248, 249, 250, 251, 252, 253, 254, 255, 102, 103, 104 (6.00 N, 43.00 E)/398.59 km 992 945 1.07 21.28 <0.001 

Note: RR clearly as the likelihood of living in areas with significantly higher unmet sanitation needs relative to regions with access to basic sanitation services.

Spatial interpolation

Each interpolated map depicts areas with varied level of predicted risk, with green representing low-risk regions and red representing high-risk zones. In 2011(left map), the spatial interpolation demonstrated Gambella and SNNP regions as major high-risk areas with concentrated red zones indicating serious concerns with basic sanitation access.

By 2016 (middle map), the predicted high-risk zones had expanded and shifted to include northern Afar, Central Oromia, and the SNNP areas, as well as the southwest and southeast borders of Tigray, Gambella, Benishangul-Gumuz, and the majority of Amhara. This indicates broader challenges in accessing basic sanitation services during this time period. In 2019 (right map), the spatial patterns changed further, with high-risk areas prominently covering the Amhara, including specific zones such as North and West Gondar and West Gojjam, Central Somali, west and south Oromia, border areas of SNNP, western border of Tigray, and some parts of Afar emerging as critical areas of concern (Figure 6).
Figure 6

Interpolated spatiotemporal trend of unmet basic sanitation services in Ethiopia from 2011 to 2019 using the Kriging interpolation method.

Figure 6

Interpolated spatiotemporal trend of unmet basic sanitation services in Ethiopia from 2011 to 2019 using the Kriging interpolation method.

Close modal

The Somali region showed notable fluctuations in basic sanitation needs over time. This might be due to migration, drought effects, or data irregularities, and note the limitations in interpolation accuracy from sparse data points in some areas.

This study investigated the spatiotemporal variations in unmet basic sanitation services in Ethiopia from 2011 to 2019, focusing on urban-rural disparities, regional inequalities, and temporal trends.

Rural regions in Ethiopia indicated stagnation, with a significant level of lack of access to basic sanitation services (93.98% in 2019). Rural sanitation improvements are hampered by persistent systemic barriers such as a lack of financing, weak institutional competence, and socio-cultural factors (Akoteyon 2019; Sinharoy et al. 2019; Hlongwa et al. 2024). Community-led total sanitation (CLTS) and other water sanitation and hygiene initiatives frequently achieve short-term success but fail to have a long-term impact (Harter et al. 2018; Brown et al. 2019). Integrating sanitation programs into larger rural development projects, such as agriculture or education, may increase basic sanitation services in rural areas (Ejigu & Yeshitela 2023; Li et al. 2024). Ethiopia's experience is similar to those of other low-income nations, emphasizing the importance of innovative and context-specific solutions for addressing rural sanitation difficulties (Ohwo & Agusomu 2018; Brown et al. 2019; Zerfu et al. 2023; Mamo & Novotný 2024).

Significant regional variations in basic sanitation access were evident that urban regions exhibited consistent progress between 2011 and 2019 in Ethiopia. However, less-developed regions such as Gambella, Somali, and Benishangul-Gumuz experienced worsening conditions or stagnation. Unmet basic sanitation services in Gambella increased from 89.79% in 2011 to 97.11% in 2019, might be due to geographic isolation, socio-political dynamics, and chronic underfunding (Akoteyon 2019; Admassie & Abebaw 2014; Yenesew et al. 2020). Similarly, regions such as Afar and Somali, characterized by nomadic lifestyles and harsh climates, require innovative and adaptive sanitation solutions (Lumborg et al. 2021). The limited progress in Tigray and SNNPR can be attributed to persistent structural challenges such as lower investment in sanitation infrastructure, higher population densities that strain existing services, and diverse socio-cultural practices.

Based on the three EDHS dataset, Global Moran's I, Getis-Ord Gi* statistic, SatScan analysis and Kriging interpolation significant variations on unmet basic sanitation services among regions in Ethiopia were identified. In the 2011 SatScan map, high-risk primary cluster was identified in regions of SNNPs, South West Ethiopia, Sidama, Gambella, West and South Oromia, and Western Somali (RR = 1.06, LLR = 91.77, P < 0.001) where mostly rural or underserved areas. The clustering patterns appear more localized compared to later years, and the difference might be due to systemic barriers such as infrastructure deficiencies and socio-economic disparities. Cold spots (marked in blue), representing areas with relatively better access, are also indicating regions that may have benefited from better investments or policies (Yenesew et al. 2020; Demsash et al. 2023; Hlongwa et al. 2024; Mekonnen et al. 2024).

The 2016 SatScan map showed a noticeable increase in the extent and intensity of clustering patterns. Multiple clusters were identified, with varying sizes and p-values. Larger circles represent primary clusters including major parts of Amhara and South Oromia and Western Somali region with more severe basic sanitation challenges (RR = 1.08, LLR = 192.23, P < 0.001), while smaller circles point to localized problems. This spread of clusters suggested that disparities in basic sanitation access may worsened or persisted over time. This intensification is likely driven by factors such as population growth, rapid urbanization without proportional improvements in infrastructure, stagnation in sanitation programs or other socio-economic factors. While cold spots remain, their extent appears reduced, suggesting that progress in improving basic sanitation access may not have been uniform across the country (Adugna 2023; Alemu et al. 2023a, 2024; Keleb et al. 2024).

By 2019, the map showed some improvement in the intensity and spread of clusters compared to 2016, although significant primary clusters still remain (RR = 1.09, LLR = 74.39, P < 0.001). The clusters are more localized, suggesting that efforts to improve sanitation access may have had some positive impacts in certain areas. However, the persistence of significant primary cluster was found at SNNPs, South West Ethiopia, Sidama, West Oromia, Gambella, and Benishangul-Gumuz regions (RR = 1.09, LLR = 74.39, P < 0.001) and the secondary cluster with 53 EAs was at major parts of Somali and Southwest Oromia (RR = 1.09, LLR = 74.39, P < 0.001) indicated that challenges remain, particularly in rural or pastoralist communities where systemic inequalities are harder to overcome.

The findings align with broader patterns observed in several Sub-Saharan African countries, revealing both shared challenges and divergent trajectories where urban areas benefit from concentrated resources, focused programs, and infrastructure investments (Armah et al. 2018; Okesanya et al. 2024).

Urban sanitation trends: Ethiopia versus Sub-Saharan peers

Consistent improvement in urban basic sanitation access was observed in Ethiopia, where unmet needs declined from 81.3% in 2011 to 58.69% in 2019, particularly in cities such as Addis Ababa, Dire Dawa, and Harari. These improvements are attributed to targeted investments, higher institutional capacity, increased public awareness, and more effective governance structures.

Comparable urban improvements have been reported in countries such as Kenya particularly Nairobi and Mombasa, benefited from pro-poor sanitation programs and public–private partnerships, contributing to a steady decline in unmet needs (Munguti & McGranahan 2001; Mugo 2006; Mwango 2013; Auerbach 2016; Muchangi et al. 2018). Urban sanitation access improved through multi-sectoral initiatives such as the Greater Accra Metropolitan Area (GAMA) Sanitation and Water Project in Ghana, emphasizing decentralized solutions and behavior change (Salifu & Darko-Mensah 2008; Knutson 2014; Hueso 2016). These similarities suggest that focused urban programming and investment in governance and infrastructure are key drivers of sanitation improvements across urban Sub-Saharan Africa.

Peri-Urban and informal settlements: shared vulnerabilities

Despite progress in central urban zones, both Ethiopia and its regional peers face significant challenges access to basic sanitation services in peri-urban and informal settlements (Bishoge 2021; Mezgebo 2021; Zerbo et al. 2021; Hlongwa et al. 2024; Maket et al. 2024). In Ethiopia, the pace of urbanization has often exceeded the capacity of local infrastructure, leading to service backlogs in rapidly expanding areas surrounding major cities.

Likewise, in Uganda, studies have shown that informal settlements in Kampala remain underserved in access to basic sanitation services despite overall urban improvements, due to land tenure issues and limited planning (O'Keefe et al. 2015; Dickson-Gomez et al. 2023). In Tanzania, Dar es Salaam's peri-urban zones face similar constraints, with infrastructure lagging behind population growth (Yap et al. 2023). Ethiopia's experience reflects this broader pattern, where unregulated expansion and informal housing undermine progress, indicating a regional need for inclusive urban sanitation strategies.

Rural sanitation gaps: persistent and widespread

Rural areas in Ethiopia showed minimal change over the study period, with unmet basic sanitation service needs remaining high (94.03% in 2011 to 93.98% in 2019). This stagnation mirrors rural sanitation trends in Niger and Chad, where access has remained critically low due to limited funding, inadequate infrastructure, and weaker institutional support (Alagidede & Alagidede 2016; Roche et al. 2017; Borja-Vega et al. 2022; Atangana & Oberholster 2023). In Malawi, where rural sanitation has progressed only modestly, relying heavily on CLTS approaches with mixed outcomes (Cole 2015; Panulo et al. 2024). These comparisons highlight a persistent rural–urban divide across the region and underscore the necessity of tailored, culturally sensitive rural sanitation policies.

Temporal trends and policy impacts

The gradual improvements in Ethiopia's urban sanitation reflect the cumulative effects of national policies, urban health extension programs, and donor-supported projects. Similar policy-driven progress has been documented in Rwanda (Brinkerhoff et al. 2009; Ekane et al. 2019), where integration of sanitation into national health and development plans helped achieve notable improvements in Senegal, which leveraged performance-based financing and decentralized sanitation planning for more equitable sanitation service delivery (Trémolet et al. 2007; Scott et al. 2019). In Ethiopia, while urban policies have yielded measurable results, the limited progress in rural areas suggests a need for recalibrated strategies that address long-standing equity and infrastructure gaps.

Strength and limitation of the study

The current study using spatiotemporal trend and pattern analysis provides valuable insights into the geographical and time variations contributing to disparities in access to basic sanitation service. The finding of the study can inform environmental and public health practitioners to design targeted interventions to reduce the gap and improve overall health outcomes. Besides, the results are representative to the source population, since the data is nationwide. Furthermore, since the data is collected across the country, the findings are representative of the source population.

This study has certain limitations, including the fact that it relied on self-reported data, which may be prone to recall bias or social desirability bias. However, efforts were made to reduce these biases via rigorous training of data collectors, pre-testing, thorough data collection processes and regular field supervision. Finally, it is important to note that the study did not explore factors influencing access to basic sanitation services. Future research could consider a more comprehensive approach to examine factors contributing for spatiotemporal variations in access to basic sanitation services.

The study revealed that, despite localized improvements in basic sanitation access in Ethiopia from 2011 to 2019, significant spatiotemporal variation persist, particularly in rural and underserved area. The hotspot analysis revealed persistent yet dynamic patterns of sanitation inequality over time whereas Sat Scan analysis showed shifting significant hotspots of unmet basic sanitation services.

While some regions showed improvement, others remain highly vulnerable in which systemic barriers continue to drive these variations emphasizing the need for targeted, context-specific interventions with continuous monitoring and evaluation. Prioritizing high-risk regions with critically low basic sanitation access is crucial for achieving sustainable and equitable solutions.

Based on the spatiotemporal analysis findings, this study recommends targeted interventions to address regional disparities in basic sanitation access across Ethiopia. Gambella, with worsening trends needs urgent and focused sanitation programs including mobile sanitation services, strengthened institutional WASH capacity, and community-led interventions. Persistent clusters in regions such as SNNPR, Sidama, South West Ethiopia, and West Oromia should be prioritized in the national sanitation agenda, with resource allocation guided by spatial analysis to ensure equitable funding. Newly affected regions such as Amhara and Benishangul-Gumuz need continued support to sustain improvements. Integrated WASH strategies across neighboring regions are essential, given the spatial interconnectedness of sanitation challenges. In rural areas where access remains lowest, scalable low-cost infrastructure and CLTS approaches are recommended. Finally, region-specific monitoring systems should be adopted to track progress and inform responsive actions.

We would like to extend our deepest gratitude to the DHS program for granting us permission to use the data for this study.

There is no specific fund received for this research.

A.K. conceptualized, designed, did software analysis, analyzed, interpreted the data, and drafted, wrote and edited the manuscript. A.E., Y.T., E.T.A., and E.M.G. conceptualized, did software analysis, wrote and edited the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript. A.E.B. conceptualized, designed, did software analysis, interpreted the data, and edited the manuscript.

The ethical procedures were conducted by the institution conducting the survey. However, we have acquired written permission from the DHS program, which granted authorization for the use of this data set. Before the data collection technique, the materials were reviewed and approved for compliance by the National Research Ethics Review Committee in Ethiopia. Strict confidentiality measures were adhered to ensuring anonymity, and the data were exclusively utilized for the specific purposes outlined in the current study.

All relevant data are included in the paper or its Supplementary Information.

The authors declare there is no conflict.

Admassie
A.
,
Abebaw
D.
, (
2014
)
Rural poverty and marginalization in Ethiopia: a review of development interventions
. In:
von Braun
J.
&
Gatzweiler
F. W.
(eds.)
Marginality: Addressing the Nexus of Poverty, Exclusion and Ecology
,
Dordrecht
Springer Netherlands
, pp.
269
300
.
Admassu
H.
,
Getinet
M.
,
Thomas
T. S.
,
Waithaka
M.
&
Kyotalimye
M.
(
2013
)
Ethiopia
,
Chapter
,
6
,
149
182
.
Akoteyon
I. S.
(
2019
)
Inequalities in access to water and sanitation in rural settlements in parts of southwest Nigeria
,
Ghana Journal of Geography
,
11
(
2
),
158
184
.
Alemu
K.
,
Worku
A.
,
Berhane
Y.
&
Kumie
A.
(
2014
)
Spatiotemporal clusters of malaria cases at village level, northwest Ethiopia
,
Malaria Journal
,
13
,
223
.
Alemu
F.
,
Eba
K.
,
Bonger
Z. T.
,
Youya
A.
,
Gerbaba
M. J.
,
Teklu
A. M.
&
Medhin
G.
(
2023b
)
The effect of a health extension program on improving water, sanitation, and hygiene practices in rural Ethiopia
,
BMC Health Services Research
,
23
(
1
),
836
.
Alemu
Z. A.
,
Kidane
A. W.
,
Liyew
E. F.
,
Mengistu
B.
,
Genanew
T. Z.
,
Adugna
E. A.
,
Woldeyohannes
M.
,
Hatehu
B. T.
,
Girmay
A. M.
,
Collyer
B.
,
Mehari
Z.
,
Tasew
G.
,
Tollera
G.
&
Tessema
M.
(
2024
)
Households’ access to basic sanitation services and associated factors in Geshiyaro project study sites in Ethiopia
,
Discover Sustainability
,
5
(
1
),
200
.
Anselin
L.
,
Syabri
I.
,
Kho
Y.
, (
2010
)
GeoDa: an introduction to spatial data analysis
. In:
Fischer
M. M.
&
Getis
A.
(eds.)
Handbook of Applied Spatial Analysis: Software Tools, Methods and Applications
,
Berlin, Heidelberg
:
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
, pp.
73
89
.
Armah
F.
,
Ekumah
B.
,
Yawson
D.
,
Odoi
J.
,
Afitiri
A.-R.
&
Nyieku
F.
(
2018
)
Access to improved water and sanitation in sub-Saharan Africa in a quarter century
,
Heliyon
,
4
,
e00931
.
Atangana
E.
&
Oberholster
P. J.
(
2023
)
Assessment of water, sanitation, and hygiene target and theoretical modeling to determine sanitation success in sub-Saharan Africa
,
Environment, Development and Sustainability
,
25
(
11
),
13353
13377
.
Auerbach
D.
(
2016
)
Sustainable sanitation provision in urban slums–the Sanergy case study
,
Broken Pumps and Promises: Incentivizing Impact in Environmental Health
,
211
216
.
Brinkerhoff
D.
,
Fort
C.
&
Stratton
S.
(
2009
) '
Health governance and decentralization in Rwanda
',
Conference: 137st APHA Annual Meeting and Exposition 2009
.
Brown
J.
,
Albert
J.
&
Whittington
D.
(
2019
)
Community-led total sanitation moves the needle on ending open defecation in Zambia
,
American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene
,
100
(
4
),
767
769
.
Central Statistics Agency, ICF International Calverton
(
2012
)
Ethiopia Demographic and Health Survey 2011
.
Addis Ababa, Ethiopia and Calverton, Maryland, USA
:
Central Statistical Agency and ICF International
.
Central Statistics Agency, ICF International Calverton
(
2017
)
Ethiopia Demographic and Health Survey 2016
.
Addis Ababa, Ethiopia and Calverton, Maryland, USA
:
Central Statistical Agency and ICF International
.
Coleman
M.
,
Coleman
M.
,
Mabuza
A. M.
,
Kok
G.
,
Coetzee
M.
&
Durrheim
D. N.
(
2009
)
Using the SaTScan method to detect local malaria clusters for guiding malaria control programmes
,
Malaria Journal
,
8
(
1
),
68
.
Cortés
J.
,
Mahecha
M.
,
Reichstein
M.
&
Brenning
A.
(
2020
)
Accounting for multiple testing in the analysis of spatio-temporal environmental data
,
Environmental and Ecological Statistics
,
27
(
2
),
293
318
.
Dearden
K. A.
,
Schott
W.
,
Crookston
B. T.
,
Humphries
D. L.
,
Penny
M. E.
&
Behrman
J. R.
&
Young Lives Determinants and Consequences of Child Growth Project Team (Santiago Cueto Le Thuc Duc Javier Escobal Lia Fernald Shaik Galab Priscila Hermida Andreas Georgiadis Elizabeth Lundeen Subha Mani Aryeh Stein Tassew Woldehanna)
(
2017
)
Children with access to improved sanitation but not improved water are at lower risk of stunting compared to children without access: a cohort study in Ethiopia, India, Peru, and Vietnam
,
BMC public health
,
17
,
1
19
.
Demsash
A. W.
,
Tegegne
M. D.
,
Wubante
S. M.
,
Walle
A. D.
,
Donacho
D. O.
,
Senishaw
A. F.
,
Emanu
M. D.
&
Melaku
M. S.
(
2023
)
Spatial and multilevel analysis of sanitation service access and related factors among households in Ethiopia: using 2019 Ethiopian national dataset
,
PLOS Global Public Health
,
3
(
4
),
e0001752
.
Dickson-Gomez
J.
,
Nyabigambo
A.
,
Rudd
A.
,
Ssentongo
J.
,
Kiconco
A.
&
Mayega
R. W.
(
2023
)
Water, sanitation, and hygiene challenges in informal settlements in Kampala, Uganda: a qualitative study
,
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
,
20
(
12
),
6181
.
Dwivedi
R.
,
Sreenivas
K.
&
Ramana
K.
(
2005
)
Cover: land-use/land-cover change analysis in part of Ethiopia using Landsat thematic mapper data
,
International Journal of Remote Sensing
,
26
(
7
),
1285
1287
.
Ejigu
A. K.
&
Yeshitela
K.
(
2023
)
Integrating resource oriented sanitation technologies with urban agriculture in developing countries: measuring the governance capacity of Arba Minch City, Ethiopia
,
Frontiers in Sustainable Cities
,
5
, (
1153502
),
1
17
.
Ekane
N.
,
Kjellén
M.
,
Westlund
H.
,
Ntakarutimana
A.
&
Mwesige
D.
(
2019
)
From words to action: linking sanitation policy to service delivery in Rwanda and Uganda
,
Development Policy Review
,
38
(
2
),
226
241
.
Ethiopian Public Health Institute and Federal Ministry of Health
(
2020
)
Ethiopia Mini Demographic and Health Survey 2019
.
Addis Ababa, Ethiopia and Calverton, Maryland, USA
:
Central Statistical Agency and ICF International
.
Fewtrell
L.
,
Kaufmann
R. B.
,
Kay
D.
,
Enanoria
W.
,
Haller
L.
&
Colford
J. M.
Jr.
(
2005
)
Water, sanitation, and hygiene interventions to reduce diarrhoea in less developed countries: a systematic review and meta-analysis
,
The Lancet Infectious Diseases
,
5
(
1
),
42
52
.
French
J.
,
Meysami
M.
,
Hall
L.
,
Weaver
N.
,
Nguyen
M.
&
Panter
L.
(
2022
)
A comparison of spatial scan methods for cluster detection
,
Journal of Statistical Computation and Simulation
,
92
,
1
30
.
García-Pérez
A.
(
2022
)
On robustness for spatio-temporal data
,
Mathematics
,
10
,
1785
.
Genet
A.
(
2020
)
Population growth and land use land cover change scenario in Ethiopia
,
International Journal of Environmental Protection and Policy
,
8
(
4
),
77
85
.
Gessese
G. T.
,
Beksisa
J.
,
Mohammed
S.
,
Bitew
S.
,
Berheto
T. M.
,
Agachew
M.
&
Misganaw
A.
(
2023
)
Diarrheal disease incidence and associated mortality in Ethiopia: a systematic subnational analysis in global burden of disease study, 1990-2019
,
Ethiopian Journal of Health Development
,
37
(
2
),
1
7
.
Girma
M.
,
Hussein
A.
,
Norris
T.
,
Genye
T.
,
Tessema
M.
,
Bossuyt
A.
,
Hadis
M.
,
Goyol
K.
&
Samuel
A.
(
2024
)
Progress in water, sanitation and hygiene (WASH) coverage and potential contribution to the decline in diarrhea and stunting in Ethiopia
,
Maternal & Child Nutrition
,
20
,
e13280
.
Heijnen
M.
,
Cumming
O.
,
Peletz
R.
,
Chan
G. K. S.
,
Brown
J.
,
Baker
K.
&
Clasen
T.
(
2014
)
Shared sanitation versus individual household latrines: a systematic review of health outcomes
,
PloS one
,
9
(
4
),
e93300
.
Hlongwa
N.
,
Nkomo
S.
&
Desai
S. A.
(
2024
)
Barriers to water, sanitation, and hygiene in Sub-Saharan Africa: a mini review
,
Journal of Water, Sanitation and Hygiene for Development
,
14
(
7
),
497
510
.
Keleb
A.
,
Daba
C.
,
Endawkie
A.
,
Asmare
L.
,
Bayou
F. D.
,
Abeje
E. T.
,
Ayres
A.
,
Mohammed
A.
,
Kebede
N.
,
Abera
K. M.
,
Mekonen
A. M.
,
Gebeyehu
E. M.
,
Kebede
S. D.
,
Enyew
E. B.
,
Arefaynie
M.
,
Tareke
A. A.
&
Tsega
Y.
(
2024
)
Rural-urban disparities in basic sanitation access among households: a multivariable decomposition analysis of Ethiopian demographic and health survey 2019
,
Frontiers in Public Health
,
12
,
1420077
,
1–10
.
Knutson
J. R.
(
2014
)
Evaluation of innovative decentralized sanitation technologies in Ghana
.
Doctoral dissertation
,
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
,
Massachusetts, U.S.A
, pp.
1
156
.
Li
X.-Z.
,
Wang
J.-F.
,
Yang
W.-Z.
,
Li
Z.-J.
&
Lai
S.-J.
(
2011
)
A spatial scan statistic for multiple clusters
,
Mathematical Biosciences
,
233
(
2
),
135
142
.
Li
Y.
,
Zhao
Y.
,
Xiang
X.
,
Zhang
Q.
,
Yuan
F.
,
Wang
Z.
,
Yao
N.
&
Zhou
C.
(
2024
)
Rural integrated sanitation assessment at community level in Chongqing, China—A cluster analysis
,
Ecological Indicators
,
165
,
112226
.
1–7
.
Maket
I.
,
Kanó
I. S.
&
Vas
Z.
(
2024
)
Quality of urban infrastructural service accessibility and human well-being in Sub-Saharan Africa
,
World Development Sustainability
,
4
,
100155
.
Mamo
B. G.
&
Novotný
J.
(
2024
)
Promotion of market-based sanitation in Ethiopia: a case study from Wolaita zone
,
Health Promotion International
,
39
(
2
),
daae034
.
1–12
.
Mekonnen
G. K.
,
Zako
A.
,
Weldegebreal
F.
,
Desalew
A.
,
Raru
T. B.
,
Umer
U.
&
Urgesa
K.
(
2024
)
Water, sanitation, and hygiene service inequalities and their associated factors among urban slums and rural communities in Eastern Ethiopia
,
Frontiers in Public Health
,
12
,
1438748
.
1–12
.
Mezgebo
T. G.
(
2021
)
Urbanization and development: policy issues, trends and prospects
. In:
Mengistu
K.
&
Getachew
D.
(eds.)
State of the Ethiopian Economy 2020/2021: Economic Development, Population Dynamics and Welfare
,
Addis Ababa
:
Ethiopian Economic Association
, pp.
1
43
.
Mills
J. E.
&
Cumming
O.
(
2016
)
The impact of water, sanitation and hygiene on key health and social outcomes
,
Sanitation and Hygiene Applied Research for Equity (SHARE) and UNICEF
,
112
,
1
110
.
Moe
C. L.
&
Rheingans
R. D.
(
2006
)
Global challenges in water, sanitation and health
,
Journal of Water and Health
,
4
(
S1
),
41
57
.
Muchangi
M.
,
Kimathi
G.
,
Moraro
R.
&
Temu
J.
(
2018
)
Sanitation financing: lessons learnt from application of different financing instruments in Busia county, Kenya
, pp.
1
5
.
Mugo
K.
(
2006
)
Sustainable Water and Sanitation Services for the Urban Poor in Nairobi
.
WEDC, Loughborough University
.
Munguti
K.-K.
&
McGranahan
G.
(
2001
)
Public Private Partnerships and the Poor: Small Enterprises and Water Provision in Kibera
.
Nairobi
:
Loughborough University
.
Mwango
C.
(
2013
) '
Enhancing hygiene promotion through access to WASH in informal settlements in Nairobi: The case of Wise Ladies
',
36th WEDC International Conference
.
Nakuru, Kenya
,
2013
.
Naish
S.
&
Tong
S.
(
2014
)
Hot spot detection and spatio-temporal dynamics of dengue in Queensland, Australia
,
Int Arch Photogramm Remote Sens Spatial Inf Sci
,
XL-8
,
197
204
.
Negreiros
J. G.
,
Painho
M. T.
,
Aguilar
F. J.
&
Aguilar
M. A.
(
2010
)
A comprehensive framework for exploratory spatial data analysis: moran location and variance scatterplots
,
International Journal of Digital Earth
,
3
(
2
),
157
186
.
Ohwo
O.
&
Agusomu
T. D.
(
2018
)
Assessment of water, sanitation and hygiene services in sub-Saharan Africa
,
European Scientific Journal
,
14
(
35
),
308
326
.
O'Keefe
M.
,
Lüthi
C.
,
Tumwebaze
I. K.
&
Tobias
R.
(
2015
)
Opportunities and limits to market-driven sanitation services: evidence from urban informal settlements in East Africa
,
Environment and Urbanization
,
27
(
2
),
421
440
.
Okesanya
O. J.
,
Eshun
G.
,
Ukoaka
B. M.
,
Manirambona
E.
,
Olabode
O. N.
,
Adesola
R. O.
,
Okon
I. I.
,
Jamil
S.
,
Singh
A.
,
Lucero-Prisno
D. E.
III
,
Ali
H. B.
&
Chowdhury
A. A.
(
2024
)
Water, sanitation, and hygiene (WASH) practices in Africa: exploring the effects on public health and sustainable development plans
,
Tropical medicine and health
,
52
(
1
),
68
.
1–9
.
Panulo
M.
,
Chidziwisano
K.
,
MacLeod
C.
,
Kapazga
T.
,
Dreibelbis
R.
,
Beattie
T. K.
&
Morse
T.
(
2024
)
CLTS Implementation in Malawi: Process Evaluation of a Sanitation and Hygiene Intervention
.
Blantyre, Malawi
.
Prüss
A.
,
Kay
D.
,
Fewtrell
L.
&
Bartram
J.
(
2002
)
Estimating the burden of disease from water, sanitation, and hygiene at a global level
,
Environmental Health Perspectives
,
110
(
5
),
537
542
.
Prüss-Ustün
A.
,
Bartram
J.
,
Clasen
T.
,
Colford
J. M.
Jr
,
Cumming
O.
,
Curtis
V.
,
Bonjour
S.
,
Dangour
A. D.
,
De France
J.
,
Fewtrell
L.
,
Freeman
M. C.
,
Gordon
B.
,
Hunter
P. R.
,
Johnston
R. B.
,
Mathers
C.
,
Mäusezahl
D.
,
Medlicott
K.
,
Neira
M.
,
Stocks
M.
,
Wolf
J.
&
Cairncross
S.
(
2014
)
Burden of disease from inadequate water, sanitation and hygiene in low-and middle-income settings: a retrospective analysis of data from 145 countries
,
Tropical Medicine & International Health
,
19
(
8
),
894
905
.
Prüss-Ustün
A.
,
Wolf
J.
,
Bartram
J.
,
Clasen
T.
,
Cumming
O.
,
Freeman
M. C.
,
Gordon
B.
,
Hunter
P. R.
,
Medlicott
K.
&
Johnston
R.
(
2019
)
Burden of disease from inadequate water, sanitation and hygiene for selected adverse health outcomes: An updated analysis with a focus on low-and middle-income countries
,
International Journal of Hygiene and Environmental Health
,
222
(
5
),
765
777
.
Sahiledengle
B.
,
Atlaw
D.
,
Mwanri
L.
,
Petrucka
P.
,
Kumie
A.
,
Tekalegn
Y.
,
Desta
F.
,
Zenbaba
D.
,
Mesfin
T.
,
Gomora
G.
&
Agho
K. E.
(
2024
)
Burden of childhood diarrhea and its associated factors in Ethiopia: a review of observational studies
,
International Journal of Public Health
,
69
,
1606399
.
1–21
.
Salifu
L. Y.
&
Darko-Mensah
E.
(
2008
)
Mainstreaming SEA in Water and Environmental Sanitation in Ghana
.
WEDC, Loughborough University
.
Sánchez-Martín
J. M.
,
Rengifo Gallego
J.
&
Morato
R.
(
2019
)
Hot spot analysis versus cluster and outlier analysis: an enquiry into the grouping of rural accommodation in extremadura (Spain)
,
International Journal of Geo-Information
,
8
,
176
.
Scott
R.
,
Scott
P.
,
Hawkins
P.
,
Blackett
I.
,
Cotton
A.
&
Lerebours
A.
(
2019
)
Integrating basic urban services for better sanitation outcomes
,
Sustainability
,
11
(
23
),
6706
.
Song
C.
&
Kulldorff
M.
(
2003
)
Power evaluation of disease clustering tests
,
International Journal of Health Geographics
,
2
(
1
),
9
.
Trémolet
S.
,
Cardone
R.
,
da Silva
C.
&
Fonseca
C.
(
2007
)
Innovations in Financing Urban Water and Sanitation
.
Center for Sustainable Urban Development Summit
, pp.
1
68
.
Tuyet-Hanh
T. T.
,
Lee
J. K.
,
Oh
J.
,
Van Minh
H.
,
Ou Lee
C.
,
Hoan
L. T.
,
Long
T. K.
,
Nam
Y.-S.
&
Long
T. K.
(
2016
)
Household trends in access to improved water sources and sanitation facilities in Vietnam and associated factors: findings from the Multiple Indicator Cluster Surveys, 2000–2011
,
Global Health Action
,
9
(
1
),
29434
.
1–8
.
UNICEF, WHO
(
2021
)
Progress on Household Drinking Water, Sanitation and Hygiene 2000–2020: Five Years Into the SDGs
.
World Health Organization
.
WHO and UNICEF
(
2018
)
Core questions on water, sanitation and hygiene for household surveys–2018 update
.
New York, U.S.A
:
JMP for Water Supply Sanitation and Hygiene
, pp.
1
24
.
World Health Organization
(
2023
)
WHO Global water, sanitation and hygiene: annual report 2022. World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland, 1–45
.
Wong
D. W.
(
2021
)
Issues in the current practices of spatial cluster detection and exploring alternative methods
,
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
,
18
(
18
),
9848
.
1–20
.
Workie
N. W.
&
Ramana
G. N.
(
2013
)
The Health Extension Program in Ethiopia
.
Washington DC, U.S.A
:
The World Bank
, pp.
1
25
.
Yap
C.
,
Mcfarlane
C.
,
Ndezi
T.
&
Makoba
F. D.
(
2023
)
Sanitation challenges in Dar es Salaam: the potential of simplified sewerage systems
,
Environment and Urbanization
,
35
(
1
),
12
29
.
Yu
W.
,
Bain
R. E.
,
Mansour
S.
&
Wright
J. A.
(
2014
)
A cross-sectional ecological study of spatial scale and geographic inequality in access to drinking-water and sanitation
,
International Journal for Equity in Health
,
13
,
1
15
.
Zerbo
A.
,
Delgado
R. C.
&
González
P. A.
(
2021
)
Water sanitation and hygiene in Sub-Saharan Africa: coverage, risks of diarrheal diseases, and urbanization
,
Journal of Biosafety and Biosecurity
,
3
(
1
),
41
45
.
Zhang
C.
,
Luo
L.
,
Xu
W.
&
Ledwith
V.
(
2008
)
Use of local Moran's I and GIS to identify pollution hotspots of Pb in urban soils of Galway, Ireland
,
Science of The Total Environment
,
398
(
1
),
212
221
.
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Licence (CC BY 4.0), which permits copying, adaptation and redistribution, provided the original work is properly cited (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).