Despite significant differences in political and administrative structures, recent reforms in urban domestic water tariff regimes in India and China have had similar trajectories with important but sometimes nuanced differences. In both countries, there has been a devolution of operational authority to municipal governments and acceptance of greater reliance on cost recovery through user fees. Reflecting this, there is considerable variation within each country in water tariffs, with cities in more water-short areas charging more than those with relatively abundant and accessible water resources. At the same time, authority over tariff setting remains largely outside the domain of the water agencies, and is highly political. One reflection of this is the infrequent adjustment of tariffs in both countries.
Skip Nav Destination
Article navigation
Research Article|
October 17 2016
Urban domestic water pricing in India and China
Frederick Lee;
aDepartment of Geography, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China
Corresponding author. E-mail: [email protected]
Search for other works by this author on:
Veena Aggarwal;
Veena Aggarwal
bThe Energy and Resources Institute, New Delhi, India
Search for other works by this author on:
James Nickum
James Nickum
cFaculty of Social Sciences, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China
Search for other works by this author on:
Water Policy (2016) 18 (S1): 68–82.
Citation
Frederick Lee, Veena Aggarwal, James Nickum; Urban domestic water pricing in India and China. Water Policy 1 December 2016; 18 (S1): 68–82. doi: https://doi.org/10.2166/wp.2016.205
Download citation file:
Sign in
Don't already have an account? Register
Client Account
You could not be signed in. Please check your email address / username and password and try again.
Could not validate captcha. Please try again.
eBook
Pay-Per-View Access
$38.00