Policies that increase the reliance of a water-supply organization (WSO) on water conservation have economic and environmental benefits, but some cities and WSOs have been reluctant to pursue such policies to their full extent. Previous research has identified barriers such as WSOs’ concerns with revenue loss and consumers’ concerns with changes in lifestyle. Based on interviews in four US cities with representatives of local business, government, water supply, environmental and other organizations, our research shows how the reluctance to pursue water conservation policies (WCPs) to their fullest extent is also related to more general political factors. We bring together growth coalition theory and sociotechnical transition theory to show how opposition varies by type of water conservation policy, including the distinction between mandates and flexible policies and between end-use policies and infrastructure policies. This approach shows how the transition to higher levels of water conservation is a political process, and we argue that understanding both the political process and the political meanings of different WCPs provides insights into strategies and their potential efficacy.
Skip Nav Destination
Article navigation
Research Article|
November 30 2016
The politics of water conservation: identifying and overcoming barriers to successful policies Available to Purchase
Kate Pride Brown;
Kate Pride Brown
aSchool of History and Sociology, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA 30332-0225, USA
Search for other works by this author on:
David J. Hess
bJames Thornton Fant Professor of Sustainability Studies, Department of Sociology, Vanderbilt University, PMB 351811, Nashville, TN 37235-1811, USA
Corresponding author. E-mail: [email protected]
Search for other works by this author on:
Water Policy (2017) 19 (2): 304–321.
Article history
Received:
June 25 2016
Accepted:
September 21 2016
Citation
Kate Pride Brown, David J. Hess; The politics of water conservation: identifying and overcoming barriers to successful policies. Water Policy 1 April 2017; 19 (2): 304–321. doi: https://doi.org/10.2166/wp.2016.089
Download citation file:
Sign in
Don't already have an account? Register
Client Account
You could not be signed in. Please check your email address / username and password and try again.
Could not validate captcha. Please try again.
eBook
Pay-Per-View Access
$38.00