This paper considers how water rights laws can shape the ways water providers coordinate when devising conjunctive water management programs. Conjunctive water management is a particularly useful tool for analyzing water management coordination because it involves certain physical and organizational complexities that may facilitate the need for coordination. It takes advantage of the natural storage capacity of underground aquifers for the storage of surface supplies during high flow seasons, allowing for recovery of those supplies when surface flows are limited. This paper compares conjunctive management programs across Arizona, California and Colorado. It identifies the distinct types of coordination associated with conjunctive water management programs across these states and shows that these forms of coordination depend upon the larger institutional setting governing rights to water resources.
Skip Nav Destination
Article navigation
Research Article|
August 01 2003
Coordination in water resource management: the impact of water rights institutions
Tanya Heikkila
Tanya Heikkila
1School of International & Public Affairs, MPA Program in Environmental Science and Policy, Columbia University, 420 W 118th Street, New York, NY 10027, USA
Search for other works by this author on:
Water Policy (2003) 5 (4): 331–348.
Article history
Received:
July 28 2002
Accepted:
June 08 2003
Citation
Tanya Heikkila; Coordination in water resource management: the impact of water rights institutions. Water Policy 1 August 2003; 5 (4): 331–348. doi: https://doi.org/10.2166/wp.2003.0020
Download citation file:
Sign in
Don't already have an account? Register
Client Account
You could not be signed in. Please check your email address / username and password and try again.
Could not validate captcha. Please try again.
eBook
Pay-Per-View Access
$38.00