The water resources of the Incomati river basin, shared between South Africa, Swaziland and Mozambique, are intensively used. Moreover, the basin is situated in a part of Africa that over the last 40 years has experienced a dynamic, sometimes turbulent and volatile, political history. Both ingredients might have been sufficient for the emergence of confrontations over water. Tensions between Mozambique, South Africa and Swaziland over Incomati waters existed but never escalated. This case study attempts to explain why cooperation prevailed, by presenting information about the natural characteristics of the basin, its political history, water developments and the negotiations that took place during the period 1967–2002. The paper provides four explanations why tensions did not escalate and cooperation prevailed. It is concluded that the developments in the Incomati basin support the hypothesis that water drives peoples and countries towards cooperation. Increased water use has indeed led to rising cooperation. When the next drought comes and Mozambique, South Africa and Swaziland enforce their recently concluded agreement, and voluntarily decrease those water uses deemed less essential, then the hypothesis has to be accepted.
Skip Nav Destination
Article navigation
Research Article|
August 01 2003
Sharing the Incomati waters: cooperation and competition in the balance
Pieter van der Zaag;
1Correspoding Author: UNESCO-IHE, PO Box 3015, 2601 DA, Delft, The Netherlands; and University of Zimbabwe, PO Box MP 167, Harare, Zimbabwe. E-mail: [email protected]
E-mail: [email protected]
Search for other works by this author on:
Álvaro Carmo Vaz
Álvaro Carmo Vaz
2Universidade Eduardo Mondlane, C.P. 257, Maputo, Mozambique. E-mail: [email protected]
Search for other works by this author on:
Water Policy (2003) 5 (4): 349–368.
Article history
Received:
May 28 2003
Accepted:
June 08 2003
Citation
Pieter van der Zaag, Álvaro Carmo Vaz; Sharing the Incomati waters: cooperation and competition in the balance. Water Policy 1 August 2003; 5 (4): 349–368. doi: https://doi.org/10.2166/wp.2003.0021
Download citation file:
Sign in
Don't already have an account? Register
Client Account
You could not be signed in. Please check your email address / username and password and try again.
Could not validate captcha. Please try again.
eBook
Pay-Per-View Access
$38.00