Conflict between the upstream and downstream residents of four major river basins in Korea has recently intensified. The introduction of a metric-based surcharge for piped water, coupled with environmental regulations, aims to resolve these conflicts. The water surcharge system was introduced both to collect revenue via a levy and to achieve a win–win situation for both upstream and downstream users through two major policy measures: increasing infrastructure investment in wastewater treatment and providing subsidies to upstream residents to compensate for the losses imposed by environmental regulations. A volumetric surcharge is in line with taxation policy as ordinary households are relatively price inelastic. However, the surcharge is an earmarked water consumption tariff for piped water in order to raise revenue, rather than a full-cost based pollution preventive measure. The remaining tasks include the comprehensive reform of the pricing system to promote equity, efficiency and sustainability of water use.
Skip Nav Destination
Close
Close
Article navigation
Research Article|
August 01 2004
A water surcharge policy for river basin management in Korea: A means of resolving environmental conflict?
Byung S. Min
1Department of International Business and Asian Studies, Griffith University, Nathan, Qld 4111, Australia
Tel:+61-7-3875 5248; Fax: +61-7-3875 5111; E-mail: B.Min@griffith.edu.au
Search for other works by this author on:
Water Policy (2004) 6 (4): 365–380.
Article history
Received:
June 01 2003
Accepted:
February 18 2004
Citation
Byung S. Min; A water surcharge policy for river basin management in Korea: A means of resolving environmental conflict?. Water Policy 1 August 2004; 6 (4): 365–380. doi: https://doi.org/10.2166/wp.2004.0024
Download citation file:
Close
Citation
Byung S. Min; A water surcharge policy for river basin management in Korea: A means of resolving environmental conflict?. Water Policy 1 August 2004; 6 (4): 365–380. doi: https://doi.org/10.2166/wp.2004.0024
Download citation file:
Close
Sign in
Don't already have an account? Register
Client Account
You could not be signed in. Please check your email address / username and password and try again.
Impact Factor 1.093
CiteScore 1.9
11
Views
0
Citations