The disposal of waste sludge generated from wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs) is a growing problem worldwide, and contributes to over 50% of the operating costs of current WWTPs. In this study, temperature-phased anaerobic digestion (TPAD) and conventional (single-stage) mesophilic anaerobic digestion were investigated in order to determine the most beneficial process for the intended digester facility to be constructed for the fermented primary and secondary sludge from a Bardenpho type biological nutrient removal plant. This was accomplished by considering several operational control parameters for three different sludge retention times. This study has shown that the TPAD system had significant improvement in biogas and methane production; solids and organic removal; pathogen reduction and dewaterability over the conventional digestion. In terms of overall volatile sulphur compounds formation normalized per volatile solids added, no significant effects were observed between TPAD and control digester.
Skip Nav Destination
Article navigation
Research Article|
September 01 2016
Temperature phased anaerobic digestion of municipal sewage sludge: a Bardenpho treatment plant study
D. Akgul;
D. Akgul
*
aUBC Bioreactor Technology Group, University of British Columbia Okanagan Campus, Kelowna, BC, Canada
bPermanent Address: Department of Environmental Engineering, Marmara University, Istanbul, Turkey
*Corresponding author. E-mail: [email protected]
Search for other works by this author on:
M. A. Cella;
M. A. Cella
aUBC Bioreactor Technology Group, University of British Columbia Okanagan Campus, Kelowna, BC, Canada
Search for other works by this author on:
C. Eskicioglu
C. Eskicioglu
aUBC Bioreactor Technology Group, University of British Columbia Okanagan Campus, Kelowna, BC, Canada
Search for other works by this author on:
Water Practice and Technology (2016) 11 (3): 569–573.
Citation
D. Akgul, M. A. Cella, C. Eskicioglu; Temperature phased anaerobic digestion of municipal sewage sludge: a Bardenpho treatment plant study. Water Practice and Technology 1 September 2016; 11 (3): 569–573. doi: https://doi.org/10.2166/wpt.2016.059
Download citation file:
Sign in
Don't already have an account? Register
Client Account
You could not be signed in. Please check your email address / username and password and try again.
Could not validate captcha. Please try again.
eBook
Pay-Per-View Access
$38.00