For this work, a pilot scale anaerobic digester was used to assess the treatability of food waste from a canteen. The digester was operated for 720 days, and its efficiency in removing organic matter and suspended solids as well as producing biogas were assessed. At the beginning of operation, the digester failed and alkalinity buffering was required until stabilization. A maximum chemical oxygen demand (COD) and total solids removal efficiency of 71% and 87% were, respectively, found for the organic loading rate of 0.59 kg COD m−3 d−1. The maximum gas production rate and specific gas production were 0.4 m3 m−3 d−1 and 0.76 m3 (kg TVS)−1, respectively, with a methane average of 60% in the biogas composition. Although achieving satisfactory levels of pollutant removal, the effluent characteristics particularly for COD and ammonia nitrogen indicated that recirculation is the best option to use effluent.
Skip Nav Destination
Article navigation
Research Article|
December 01 2016
Anaerobic treatment of food waste in pilot scale
Alexsandro dos Santos Reis;
Alexsandro dos Santos Reis
aLaboratory of Environmental Engineering, Technology Center, Federal University of Pernambuco, Rodovia BR-104, km 62, Nova Caruaru, Caruaru – PE CEP: 55002-970, Brazil
Search for other works by this author on:
Savia Gavazza;
Savia Gavazza
bLaboratory of Environmental Sanitation, Civil Engineering Department, Federal University of Pernambuco, Avenida Prof. Moraes Rego, 1235 - Cidade Universitária, Recife – PE CEP: 50670-901, Brazil
Search for other works by this author on:
Simone Machado Santos
Simone Machado Santos
*
aLaboratory of Environmental Engineering, Technology Center, Federal University of Pernambuco, Rodovia BR-104, km 62, Nova Caruaru, Caruaru – PE CEP: 55002-970, Brazil
Search for other works by this author on:
Water Practice and Technology (2016) 11 (4): 774–783.
Citation
Alexsandro dos Santos Reis, Savia Gavazza, Simone Machado Santos; Anaerobic treatment of food waste in pilot scale. Water Practice and Technology 1 December 2016; 11 (4): 774–783. doi: https://doi.org/10.2166/wpt.2016.084
Download citation file:
Sign in
Don't already have an account? Register
Client Account
You could not be signed in. Please check your email address / username and password and try again.
Could not validate captcha. Please try again.
eBook
Pay-Per-View Access
$38.00