Removal of methylene blue from aqueous solutions by adsorption on amorphous silicon dioxide from rice husks

This study shows the effect of conditions on methylene blue sorption from aqueous solutions using amorphous silicon dioxide obtained from rice husk by oxidative roasting with and without pre-treatment with 0.1 M HCl. Adsorption activity for methylene blue increases with increasing pH, reaching its maximum above the point of zero charge. Thermodynamic parameter values (ΔG298. 0, ΔH, 0, ΔS. 0) indicate that methylene blue adsorption is exothermic and occurs with an increase in molecular mobility in the adsorption layer. The process is described by the Freundlich and Dubinin-Astakhov equations, which indicates that it is determined by both electrostatic interaction with active centers on the surface and the volumetric filling of micropores.


INTRODUCTION
Dyes with intense adsorption bands in the ultraviolet and visible regions of the spectrum are commonly used to assess the adsorption capacity of adsorbents.One such is methylene blue (MB) (Balykin et al. 2004).The MB sorption activity of materials is determined by various spectrophotometric methods that differ in sorbent:solution ratio and wavelength.The sorbent:solution ratios are typically -1:10, 1:100, 1:250, 1:500, and/or 1:1,000, and the wavelength varies from 660 to 690 nm (Selyutin et al. 2013;P'yanova et al. 2017).In addition to spectrophotometric methods, the sorption activity of clays is often determined using a titrimetric method based on titration of an aqueous suspension with an MB solution.No unified method for determining the MB sorption activity for various materials has yet been developed, however.
The behavior of MB in solution and the adsorption capacities of materials depend on many factors: composition, physicochemical properties, adsorbent mass, initial dye concentration, solution pH, contact time between adsorbent and dye, and temperature.All of these make it difficult to compare the quality of the sorbents described by different researchers.
MB sorption is influenced significantly by the adsorbent dose with the remaining conditions unchanged.For example, the maximum MB removal (82.47%) by pomegranate peel was achieved with a biosorbent content of 0.08 g in 100 ml of solution.Further addition of the sorbent had no significant effect (Jawad et al. 2018).When extracting MB from aqueous solution using bone charcoal as the sorbent, a dosage increase from 0.3 to 10 g in 50 ml of solution led to a decrease in adsorptive capacity (Ghanizadeh & Asgari 2011).
Solution pH affects adsorption efficiency significantly, regulating the degree of ionization of the adsorbate's functional groups (Singh et al. 2017) and the surface charge of the sorbent (Corda & Kini 2018).A number of works (Dogan et al. 2004;Dogan et al. 2009;Liu et al. 2012;Mulugeta & Lelisa 2014;Jia et al. 2017;Tamimi et al. 2018) report that MB adsorption is higher in an alkaline medium, and decreases in an acidic medium.
An important parameter is adsorbent contact time with the dye solution.As dye concentration increases, longer contact is required to reach equilibrium.For example, Jawad et al. (2018) showed that 50 mg/L of MB took about 120 min to reach adsorption equilibrium on pomegranate (Punica granatum) peel, while 300 mg-MB/L required almost 390 min.Pseudo-first and pseudo-second order models describe the kinetics of sorption onto sorbents of different nature, but, in this case, they obey principally the pseudo-second order equation (Vieira et al. 2009;Rafatullah et al. 2010;Soldatkina & Zavrichko 2018;Van et al. 2018).
Temperature is also important, and it has been shown that MB adsorption at temperatures between 293 and 333 K is an endothermic process and spontaneous in character (Liu et al. 2012;Tamimi et al. 2018;Lakkaboyana et al. 2019).Mulugeta & Lelisa (2014) and Van et al. (2018) both report studies of the effect of initial MB concentration on its adsorption by dry, untreated Parthenium hystrophorous biomass and activated carbon from coconut shells.The studies show that the proportion of adsorption increases to a certain value, associated with an increase in surface area and the presence of a large number of adsorption sites.Then, as the concentration increases further, the number of active sites available becomes smaller, and the number are too few to remove MB, because of which adsorption capacity decreases.A number of studies (Djilani et al. 2015;Corda & Kini 2018;Jawad et al. 2018;Mouni et al. 2018;Soldatkina & Zavrichko 2018) have shown that the MB sorption isotherm on various sorbentse.g.pomegranate (Punica granatum) peel, activated carbons from different sources, corn stalks modified by cetylpyridinium bromide, kaolin, etcis best described by the Langmuir model.
Today, many researchers are attracted by cheap raw materials as sorbent sources.Rafatullah et al. (2010) considered the MB adsorption capacity of inexpensive materialsnatural materials, biomass, industrial and agricultural wastesin their review, and showed that they are effective and can be used instead of commercial activated carbons for MB removal from aqueous solutions.
About 150 million tonnes of rice husk (RH), a by-product of rice production, are produced globally annually.The maximum value of commercially available rice husk is approximately 0.025 USD kg À1 .Since the main components of RH are carbon and silica (15 to 22% SiO 2 ), it has potential for adsorbent production (Rafatullah et al. 2010).RH ash is one promising material, and, depending on the process used, silica of various qualities can be obtained from it, including 'black ash' (SiO 2 content 36 to 88%) with a yield of between 36 and 44%, and 'white ash' (SiO 2 90 to 99.99%) with 9 to 21% yield (Sergienko et al. 2004).
There is no comparative information on the effect of the conditions for MB removal from aqueous solutions on the sorption capacity indicators of RH ash with different silica contents in the literature.The purpose of this work was to study the effect of conditions on MB sorption from aqueous solution using RH-derived amorphous silicon dioxide.

Sample development
RH was collected from a mill in Vietnam and meshed (∼8 mesh) to remove tiny fractions (bran siftings, dust).It was then washed in distilled water and air dried, before being ashed at 300 °C to remove volatiles.After ashing, the material was subjected to oxidative roasting for 3 hours in a WiseTherm muffle furnace (DAIHAN, South Korea) at 650 °C.Finally, it was ground to a fine (gray) powder, referred to below as RH-1.RH-1 yield was 10.3%.
A portion of the meshed RH was hydrolyzed using 1 mol L À1 HCl heated to 90°С for an hour in a reactor.The temperature was controlled using an EKT Hei Con thermocouple (Heidolph, Germany).The solid:liquid mass ratio was 1:13, and the residue was filtered using synthetic fabric to 15 μm and air dried.After, the process was the same as that used to produce RH-1oxidative roasting in the muffle furnace for 3 hours at 650 °C followed by grinding to a fine (white) powder, referred to below as RH-2.RH-2 yield was 9.1%.
To study their sorption properties, both RH-1 and RH-2 were meshed (16 Â 60 mesh) and dried at 105 °C to constant mass.

Sample characterization
The samples' silicon content was determined gravimetrically (GOST 9428-73 1993), while an atomic absorption spectrometer АА-780 (Shimadzu, Japan) was used to determine the elemental composition of impurities.X-ray diffraction was performed using a D8 ADVANCE diffractometer (Bruker, Germany) and CuKα-radiation.Infrared absorption spectra in the range 400 to 4,000 cm À1 in potassium bromide were recorded with Vertex 70 (Bruker, Germany), to determine the samples' functional groups.

Adsorption studies
The sorption studies were performed at a fixed temperature of 293 К. 0.004 g sorbent samples were placed in glass-stoppered, dry, conical flasks and 10 ml MB solution was added.The flask samples were mixed in a Unimax 1010 (Heidolph, Germany) shaker for 30 minutes, before being centrifuged for 15 minutes.The residual MB content was analyzed using visible spectrophotometry (UNICO-1201, United Products & Instruments Inc., USA) at a filtered wavelength (λ) of 660 nm.
All experiments were performed at least in triplicate.The results are the average of three independent measurements along with the standard deviation (SD) showing 95% confidence level.
The removal efficiency (%) or MB sorption can be evaluated using Equation (1): where С 0 and С e are the initial and equilibrium concentrations (mg•L À1 ).The amount of MB adsorbed at equilibrium was calculated using Equation ( 2): where С 0 and С e are the initial and equilibrium concentrations (mg•L À1 ), m the mass of sorbent (g), and, V the solution volume (ml).

Influence of pH
The pH dependence of MB adsorption by RH-1 and RH-2 was determined over the pH range 1 to 12, using а SevenCompact pH-meter (Mettler Toledo, Switzerland) and appropriate buffer solutions: 100 mg samples were suspended by stirring in 10 ml of the relevant buffer solution and 1 ml of MB at 1,500 mg-MB L À1 .Stirring continued for 1 hour.

Point of zero charge
The point of zero charge of RH-1 and RH-2 was determined by the solid addition method (Vieira et al. 2009).20.0 ml aliquots of solution were transferred to 100 ml conical flasks with the initial pH (pH 0 ) varying from 1 to 12.The initial pH was corrected in each case, where necessary, by adding 0.10 mol L À1 of either hydrochloric acid or sodium hydroxide.The solution pH 0 was then measured accurately and 0.10 g of RH-1 or RH-2 was added to each flask, which was securely capped immediately.The suspensions were mixed in a Unimax 1,010 (Heidolph, Germany) shaker for 24 hours and the supernatants' final pH values (pH f ) measured.
The difference between the initial and final pH values, ΔpH ¼ pH 0 -pH f , was plotted against pH 0 and the point of intersection of the resulting null Δ pH corresponds to the point of zero charge, pH PZC .

Ratio of sample weight to solution volume (S:V)
Samples weighing 1; 0.1; 0.04; 0.05 and 0.025 g were placed in 50 ml conical flasks, corresponding to the ratio of the sample mass to the solution volume (S:V) 1:10, 1:100, 1:250, 1:500 1:1,000, and 10 ml of MB solution was added (3.2 and 5.1 mg-MB L À1 ).After 60 minutes, the solution and sample were separated by centrifugation.The residual MB content was determined as described in section 2.3, and the removal efficiency and amount of MB adsorbed using Equations ( 1) and (2).

Water suspension pH measurement
The water suspension pH was measured using 1; 0.1; 0.04; 0.05 and 0.025 g samples in conical flasks to which distilled water was added.The closed flasks were shaken for 30 minutes, after which the flask contents were centrifuged for 15 minutes.The pH of the medium was then measured.
Two kinetic models were used in the analysis (Janos et al. 2003): pseudo-first (Lagergren model) and pseudo-second order.Their respective integral equations are: ln(q e À q) ¼ ln q e À k 1 Á t (3) where q is the amount of MB adsorbed at time t (mmol g À1 ); q e is the amount of MB adsorbed at equilibrium (mmol g À1 ); k 1 is the sorption rate constant for the pseudo-first order model; and, k 2 is the sorption rate constant for the pseudo-second order model.

Thermodynamics
Thermodynamic parameters including standard free energy change (ΔG 0 , kJ mol À1 ), enthalpy change (ΔH 0 , kJ mol À1 ) and entropy change (ΔS 0 , J mol À1 K À1 ) were determined using the van't Hoff equation as expressed in Equations ( 5) and ( 6) (Frolov 1988): where K d is the standard thermodynamic equilibrium defined by C ad /C e , in which C ad (mg L À1 ) is on the solid adsorbent and C e (mg L À1 ) is in the solution; • T is the absolute temperature, K; and • R is the universal gas constant (8.314J mol À1 K À1 ).

Adsorption equilibrium
The equilibrium sorption isotherm expresses the specific relationship between the sorbate concentration and its degree of accumulation on the sorbent surface at a constant temperature of 298 K.
The MB sorption isotherm was developed using the separate portions method at different initial concentrations, ranging from 0.09 to 5.25 mmol-MB L À1 .Different isotherm models were used to help to understand the nature of the adsorbate/adsorbent interactions -Freundlich (7), Langmuir (8), and Dubinin-Astakhov (9) (Keltsev 1984).
where q e is the sorbed concentration on the sorbent surface (mmol•g À1 ); С e is the equilibrium concentration in solution (mmol L À1 ); k f is the Freundlich constant; and, n is a constant.q e ¼ q 0 kC kC 1 + kC kC (8) where q e is the sorbed concentration on the sorbent surface (mmol•g À1 ); С e is the equilibrium concentration in solution (mmol L À1 ); k is the Langmuir constant; and, q 0 is the monolayer adsorption capacity (mmol•g À1 ).
where q e is the sorbed concentration on the sorbent surface (mmol•g À1 ); С e is the equilibrium concentration in solution (mmol L À1 ); q m is the theoretical monolayer sorption capacity (mmol•g À1 ) ; ; k is a constant; R is the universal gas constant (8.314J mol À1 K À1 ); T is the absolute temperature, (K); C s is the limit of solubility (mmol L À1 ); and, n .-1,2…6.

Adsorbent characterization
The SiO 2 content of RH-1 is 92.7%.Acid pre-treatment before oxidative roasting leads to the production of ash with a high SiO 2 content -97.6%.The samples obtained contained traces of carbon, and alkali and alkaline earth metals, the amount depending on the sample's preliminary treatment (Table 1).
The IR spectroscopy showed that the structures of RH-1 and RH-2 are similar.In the spectra, the absorption bands correspond to the deformation (469 to 471 cm À1 ) and stretching (symmetric and asymmetric) vibrations (804 to 806 cm À1 and 1,103 cm À1 ) of the Si-O-Si siloxane bonds.The absorption bands at ∼1,650 and ∼3,400 cm À1 indicate the presence of OH groups.XRF analysis showed that RH-1 and RH-2 are in an X-ray amorphous state (Zemnukhova et al. 2014).As can be seen, MB adsorption is minimal for RH-1 over the pH range 1 to 8 (Figure 1(a)), and for RH-2 from pH 1 to 6 (Figure 1(b)).When the medium becomes more alkaline (pH 9 for RH-1 and pH 8 for RH-2), adsorption increases sharply.

Effect of reaction pH on MB adsorption
An important characteristic of the adsorbent is the zero charge point (pH PZC )that is, the pH at which the adsorbent surface has zero electric charge (Figure 2).At pH values below pH PZC , the surface is charged positively, above it, negatively charged (Ghanizadeh & Asgari 2011;Van et al. 2018).
The surfaces of RH-1 and RH-2 carry proton-donating Bronsted acid centers (pKa þ6.4) and proton-accepting Bronsted basic centers (pKa þ7.15, þ10.0), due to traces of alkaline earth metals (Table 1).On the surface of RH-1, there are more proton-acceptor Bronsted bases than on RH-2 due to the latter's higher impurity content (Arefieva et al. 2020).As a result, the surface of RH-1  It is also noted that the surface of RH-1 becomes negatively charged at pH .10 and of RH-2 at pH .6 (Figure 2).Thus, the low adsorption rates in an acidic medium can be explained by a weak interaction between the molecular form of MB and the positively charged active centers RH-1 and RH-2, while electrostatic repulsion arises between the MB þ and the surfaces.In an alkaline medium, electrostatic interaction occurs between the cationic form of MB þ and the negatively charged silicon-containing surfaces.

S:V ratio effect on MB adsorption
As Figure 3(a) and 3(b) show, the MB adsorption efficiency increases for RH-1 and decreases for RH-2, with increased adsorbent mass.As RH-1's mass increases in solution, the pH rises (Figure 4(a)), leading to an increase in adsorption of the cationic form of MB.An increase in the mass of RH-2 lowers the solution pH (Figure 4(b)).In an acidic medium (see Section 3.2) MB adsorption is reduced by repulsion between the positively charged dye and the sorbent's protonated surface.
MB's proportional adsorption onto RH-1 and RH-2 decreases with increasing adsorbent mass (Figure 3(c) and 3(d)).This arises because, while the amount of adsorbent in the dye solution is low, MB molecules can reach the sorbent surface easily.An increase in adsorbent mass increases the number of adsorption centers but access to them can be blocked.A large amount of adsorbent also leads to particle agglomeration and a decrease in the total adsorption surface, and, consequently, a decrease in adsorption activity (Tamimi et al. 2018).
Analysis shows (Figure 3(a) and 3(b)) that at an S:V ratio of 1: 250, for both RH-1 and RH-2, the MB absorption efficiency is sufficiently high (86 and 97%, respectively; initial concentration 5.1 mg-MB L À1 ) and adsorption activity (∼1 mg g À1 ).Because of that, this S:V ratio was used in further studies.

Adsorption kinetic and thermodynamics studies
The kinetic curves (Figure 5 -RH-1; Figure 6 -RH-2) show that the sorption equilibrium ∼ 98% is reached 15 minutes after sorption startsthat is, this is sufficient time for MB absorption from aqueous solution.Analysis of the time dependence at 298 K using the known models (Soldatkina &    2), indicating that the sorption process is determined by interaction between the sorbate (MB) and the samples' active centers.As the temperature rises to 318 K, MB sorption increases.
The change in Gibbs free energy, ΔG 298 , is positive for both samples, which indicates that the process is not spontaneous.If the sample's ΔH value is negative, the process is exothermic, a positive change in entropy indicates molecular mobility in the layer upon adsorption from solution (Table 3).

Equilibrium isotherms
Experimental MB-adsorption isotherms for silicon-containing RH products yield type I adsorption isotherms according to the BDDT classification (Brunauer, Deming, Deming, Teller) (Figure 7).This type of isotherm, characterized by the presence of an almost horizontal plateau, describes adsorption on many materials, including silica xerogels, oxides of titanium, aluminum, tin, etc, as well as carbon sorbents.Adsorption is usually limited because the pore sizes are very small and no more than one layer of molecules can form on their walls (Gregg & Sing 1982).Adsorption increases to a maximum associated with the presence of numerous adsorption sites and their availability.Then, as the concentration increases, the number of active sites available falls, and there are not enough of them to remove MB, so the adsorption capacity decreases.The sorption isotherm was linearized in the coordinates of the Freundlich, Langmuir, and Dubinin-Astakhov equations.As it is assumed in the Langmuir model that adsorption occurs on the surface of a solid body consisting of active centers, and that RH-1 has a heterogeneous structure (SiO 2 content is 92.7%), the model is difficult to apply to describe MB sorption.RH-2 is more homogeneous (SiO 2 97.6%) and the Langmuir equation can be used to determine the main parameters of the sorption process.As can be seen in Table 4, the adsorption isotherms for both samples are best described by the Freundlich and Dubinin-Astakhov equations.The Dubinin-Astakhov equation was logarithmized at n ¼ 1-6, and the maximum approximation coefficients obtained were n ¼ 1 for RH-1 and ¼ 6 for RH-2.The energy sorbent values were determined using the Dubinin-Astakhov equation.The values were low ÀRH-1 -25.80 and RH-2 -24.76 kJ mol À1 .It is also possible, using this equation, to calculate the total micropore volume -0.038 cm 3 g À1 for RH-1 and 0.047 for RH-2.
The experimental adsorption isotherm for RH-1 is close to those calculated using the Freundlich and Dubinin-Astakhov equations (Figure 8), that for RH-2 is closer to the Freundlich isotherm (Figure 9).electrostatic interaction with active centers on the surface and the volumetric filling of the micropore adsorption space.

Figure 1
Figure1shows curves of the changes in MB adsorption versus pH of the aqueous suspensions of RH-1 and RH-2.

Figure 5 |
Figure 5 | Effects of contact time on RH-1 MB removal efficiency at different temperatures.

Figure 6 |
Figure 6 | Effects of contact time on RH-2 MB removal efficiency at different temperatures.

CONCLUSIONS 1 .
The study concerned the influence of conditions on methylene blue removal from aqueous solution by amorphous silicon dioxide obtained from rice husk by different processes (SiO 2 content 92.7 and 97.6%).It was established that the point of zero surface charge -RH-1 -pH 9.89; RH-2 -pH 6.01depends on the sorbent's composition and the number of Bronsted acid-base centers.2. The study showed that the samples' methylene blue adsorption activity increases with increasing pH, reaching a maximum value above the point of zero charge.If the sorbent:solution ratio decreases, methylene blue adsorption decreases.It increases with increasing temperature.3.For silicon-containing sorbents from rice husk, sorption equilibrium for methylene blue (∼ 98%) is achieved in 15 minutes.The thermodynamic parameter values obtained (ΔG 298 .0, ΔH , 0, ΔS .0) indicate that the methylene blue adsorption process is exothermic and occurs with an increase in molecular mobility in the adsorption layer.4. The methylene blue adsorption mechanism by rice husk-derived silicon-containing sorbents was also studied.In the concentration range 0 to 5.2 mmol L À1 the process is described by the Freundlich and Dubinin-Astakhov equations.Methylene blue adsorption is determined by both

Table 2 |
Kinetic model parameters

Table 3 |
Thermodynamic parameters of MB adsorption