This experimental research was an investigation into removal of mercury by using a strong acid cation resin, 001 × 7. Parametric experiments were conducted to determine the optimum pH, resin dosage, agitation speed and the effect of change in concentration in the range of 50–200 mg/L. High resin dosages favoured better removal efficiency but resulted in lower uptakes. Equilibrium experiments were performed and fitted to Langmuir and Freundlich isotherm models. Langmuir model suited well to this study confirming the homogeneity of the resin surface. The Langmuir constants were estimated as qmax = 110.619 mg/g and KL = 0.070 L/g at 308 K. Kinetic experiments were modeled using Pseudo second order model and higher values of R2 (>0.97) were obtained. The Pseudo second order kinetic constants, namely, equilibrium uptake (qe) and rate constant (k2), were evaluated as 59.17 mg/g and 40.2 × 10−4 g mg−1 min−1 at an initial mercury concentration of 100 mg/L and temperature of 308 K.
INTRODUCTION
Heavy metal contamination in terrestrial and aquatic ecosystem is widespread in all the developing countries and poses serious threat to the flora and fauna through their accumulation in food chain. Depollution of heavy metal contamination is more challenging as they are non-biodegradable and have increased tendency to bio accumulate. Mercury is one of most harmful heavy metal contaminants used in mining, caustic-chlorine, crude refining, medical and battery production facilities (Wan Ngah & Hanafiah 2008; Plaza et al. 2011). Mercury finds its use in various forms, including elemental, organic and ionic forms. Mercury contamination through methyl mercury chloride has been reported in aquatic organisms, fishes and birds. Minamata disease is a proven evidence for the harmful effect of mercury contaminated fish and has created a negative impact on human health (Yavuz et al. 2006). Mercury poisoning in humans lead to a disorder called hydragyria which damages the central nervous system, lungs and kidney. This effect of mercury was reported to occur due to the increased affinity of mercury for protein binding. It is inevitable to remove or recover mercury from the contaminated water. Mercury removal can be investigated using a number of physico-chemical conventional methods like coagulation, precipitation, solvent extraction, foam floatation, filtration and evaporation (Yavuz et al. 2006; Pan et al. 2010; Fu & Wang 2011; Lee et al. 2007). Most of these traditional methods suffer from demerits like increased operating costs, excess usage of chemicals and low efficiency. Several studies have focused on utilization of novel biomass based adsorbents using plant material (Al Rmailli et al. 2008; Rajamohan et al. 2014), algae (Plaza et al. 2011) and other natural sources for the removal of metals (Park et al. 2010). Ion exchange technology is proposed as an alternative for the remediation of heavy metal contaminated water. Ion exchange resins involve interchange of ions between two phases through a resin, which is a cross-linked polymer network. The advantage of this method lies with the insolubility of the resin which makes the separation easier by filtration (Alexandratos 2009). Studies on the removal of nickel and zinc from aqueous solutions by ion exchange resins have been conducted (Alyuz & Veli 2009; Franco et al. 2013). Boron removal using strong base anion-exchange resin, Dowex 2 × 8, was carried out in column experiments (Ennil Kose & Ozturk 2008). Gel resin containing sulfonate groups, Dowex 50 W, was successfully applied for the removal of copper, zinc, nickel, cadmium and lead ions (Pehlivan & Altun 2006). Research studies on equilibrium and kinetic modeling on heavy metal exchange using resins have been reported (Shek et al. 2009). In this experimental study, a strong acid cation resin, 001 × 7, has been investigated for its potential to remove mercury from aqueous solutions. The optimal conditions suitable for maximum mercury removal were identified through the parametric studies. Equilibrium experiments were conducted and the isotherm parameters were determined. Kinetic mechanism was elucidated using pseudo-second order model.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Chemicals
Mercury solution was prepared by diluting aliquots of the stock solution which contains 1,000 mg/L of Hg (NO3)2.1/2 H2O in double distilled water. The pH of the working solution was maintained using analytical reagent (AR) grade HCl, NaOH and buffer solutions (Merck, Germany). All other reagents used were of AR grade and obtained from Sigma Aldrich chemicals.
Activation of ion exchange resin
The resin used in this study is a strong acid cationic resin −001 × 7 which contains sulphonic acid (−SO3H) as the functional group. This cation exchange resin has moisture content in the range of 45–55% and was used for water softening applications. The particle size of the supplied resin was in the range of 0.42–1.2 mm in diameter. The resin was washed with HCl (1 M) and NaOH (1 M) for the removal of impurities and with deionized water (Millipore Milli-Q) repeatedly for several times and dried at 50 °C in a vacuum oven for 12 h. It was stored in a desiccator for further use.
Parametric studies


Equilibrium studies
Kinetic modeling




RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
Effect of pH
Effect of pH on percentage mercury removal (t = 180 min, C0 = 100 mg/L, M = 3.0 g/L).
Effect of pH on percentage mercury removal (t = 180 min, C0 = 100 mg/L, M = 3.0 g/L).
Effect of resin dosage
Effect of resin dosage on % mercury removal and uptake (t = 180 min, C0 = 100 mg/L, T = 308 K).
Effect of resin dosage on % mercury removal and uptake (t = 180 min, C0 = 100 mg/L, T = 308 K).
Effect of initial metal concentration
Effect of initial mercury concentration on % mercury removal (t = 180 min, C0 = 100 mg/L, T = 308 K).
Effect of initial mercury concentration on % mercury removal (t = 180 min, C0 = 100 mg/L, T = 308 K).
Effect of agitation speed
Effect of speed of agitation on mercury uptake (t = 180 min, C0 = 100 mg/L, T = 308 K).
Effect of speed of agitation on mercury uptake (t = 180 min, C0 = 100 mg/L, T = 308 K).
Equilibrium studies
Isotherm constants for removal of mercury
T . | Langmuir constants . | Freundlich constants . | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
K . | R2 . | n . | R2 . | |||
303 | 96.154 | 0.056 | 0.980 | 4.000 | 3.026 | 0.967 |
308 | 110.619 | 0.070 | 0.980 | 3.817 | 3.115 | 0.923 |
313 | 112.360 | 0.078 | 0.981 | 3.671 | 3.430 | 0.962 |
T . | Langmuir constants . | Freundlich constants . | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
K . | R2 . | n . | R2 . | |||
303 | 96.154 | 0.056 | 0.980 | 4.000 | 3.026 | 0.967 |
308 | 110.619 | 0.070 | 0.980 | 3.817 | 3.115 | 0.923 |
313 | 112.360 | 0.078 | 0.981 | 3.671 | 3.430 | 0.962 |

Kinetic studies
Pseudo-second order model kinetic constants for the removal of mercury
T (K) . | R2 . | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
303 | 50 | 17.04 | 9.47 | 0.995 |
100 | 38.91 | 2.24 | 0.980 | |
150 | 54.64 | 1.08 | 0.979 | |
200 | 64.94 | 0.81 | 0.972 | |
308 | 50 | 49.50 | 50.5 | 0.994 |
100 | 59.17 | 40.2 | 0.999 | |
150 | 62.89 | 32.3 | 0.998 | |
200 | 71.43 | 24.8 | 0.999 | |
313 | 50 | 57.14 | 67.4 | 0.996 |
100 | 69.93 | 52.2 | 0.999 | |
150 | 74.07 | 43.7 | 0.999 | |
200 | 76.92 | 36.7 | 0.999 |
T (K) . | R2 . | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
303 | 50 | 17.04 | 9.47 | 0.995 |
100 | 38.91 | 2.24 | 0.980 | |
150 | 54.64 | 1.08 | 0.979 | |
200 | 64.94 | 0.81 | 0.972 | |
308 | 50 | 49.50 | 50.5 | 0.994 |
100 | 59.17 | 40.2 | 0.999 | |
150 | 62.89 | 32.3 | 0.998 | |
200 | 71.43 | 24.8 | 0.999 | |
313 | 50 | 57.14 | 67.4 | 0.996 |
100 | 69.93 | 52.2 | 0.999 | |
150 | 74.07 | 43.7 | 0.999 | |
200 | 76.92 | 36.7 | 0.999 |
Pseudo-second-order kinetic model plot for the sorption of mercury at 303 K.
Pseudo-second-order kinetic model plot for the sorption of mercury at 308 K.
Pseudo-second-order kinetic model plot for the sorption of mercury at 313 K.
CONCLUSIONS
The results obtained in this study demonstrated the potential of strong acid cation resin 001 × 7 for the removal of mercury from its aqueous solution. The optimum pH and resin dosage for mercury removal were found to be 5.0 and 3.0 g/L respectively. The removal efficiency decreased with increase in mercury concentration and sorbent dosage influenced the uptake in a negative pattern. Monolayer attachment of metal ions was proved to be suitable through Langmuir isotherm. The maximum uptake values increased from 96.154 to 112.360 mg/g when the temperature increased from 303 to 313 K. Kinetic experiments were found to be represented by Pseudo second order model and the rate constants increased with temperature for fixed initial metal concentrations. Thus, it can be concluded that the resin 001 × 7 proved to be an efficient choice for the removal of mercury over a wide range of experimental conditions.