In this study, we collected 22 groundwater samples and supporting measurements from different coal-mining districts in the Huaibei coalfield to examine the age, hydro-chemical characteristics, and evolution of groundwater in the Ordovician limestone aquifer (OA). We determined the groundwater concentrations of major ions, stable isotopes (hydrogen and oxygen) and a radio isotope (14C). All the samples were alkaline in nature, and had pH values between 7.10 and 10.80. The total dissolved solids (TDS) contents varied from 119 to 2,443 mg/l. The concentrations of δD and δ18O in groundwater varied from −64.32‰ to −42.76‰, and from −8.62‰ to −5.40‰, with mean values of −56.38‰ and −7.62‰, respectively. The groundwater at OA is recharged by rainfall or surface water, and, because of either the long residence time or runoff into the aquifer, is influenced by water-rock interactions. The age of the groundwater in the OA ranged from 2,660a to 10,040a, and the groundwaters were youngest and oldest in the Renlou and Yangzhuang coal mines, respectively. Contour diagrams of TDS in groundwater, the groundwater age, and the spatial distribution of the water types indicated that the Renlou and Yangzhuang mines were the recharge and discharge areas, respectively.

Deep groundwater usually contains a wealth of geological information, as it flows through, or remains in, aquifers for long periods of time (Zouari et al. 2011; Ma et al. 2015). As such, geochemical indicators are often used to answer questions about hydrogeological conditions, groundwater evolution, and water-rock interactions (Price & Swart 2006; Currell et al. 2016). In addition, the deep groundwater, which is renewed slowly and generally unpolluted, serves as a major storage zone for water resources. In mining areas, deep groundwater is not only a precious resource that is exploited for agricultural, urban, and industrial uses, but is also a threat to the safety of coal mine exploitation. Many studies have examined the hydrochemical evolution of groundwater, groundwater runoff, and hydrogeochemical processes in recent decades (Gui et al. 2011; Sun et al. 2011; Chen & Gui 2015), and these studies have provided useful information to support efficient groundwater development schemes and have helped to reduce both coal mining hazards and groundwater quality deterioration.

Previous studies have frequently reported information about the hydrochemical characteristics, water-rock interactions, and hydrogeochemical processes (Chen et al. 2013; 2014), but not about the age, renewal, and evolution of deep groundwater. Radiogenic isotopes, such as 14C and 3H, can be used to determine the age, evolution, and flow of deep groundwater. In this study, we collected samples of deep groundwater from the Huaibei coalfield, Anhui Province, China. The main objectives of the studies were (1) to define the geochemical characteristics of the groundwater in the Ordovician limestone aquifer (OA); (2) to constrain the age and evolution of deep groundwater, and (3) to understand the spatial variations in hydrochemistry and recharge of deep groundwater.

The Huaibei coalfield extends over most of the North China Plain and has significant coal resources. This area has a marine-continental climate, an annual average temperature of 14.7 °C, and average monthly maximum and minimum temperatures of 31.8 °C and −3.2 °C in July and January, respectively, measured for the period from 2005 to 2015. The average annual precipitation and evaporation are about 867.0 mm and 832.4 mm, respectively, and more than 50% of the total precipitation falls in the period from June to September (Chen et al. 2014). Surface water is scarce in the study area, so deep groundwater is the main source of water for industrial and domestic uses.

In the Huaibei coalfield, the coal bearing formations, with a total thickness of more than 1,300 m, are mainly distributed in Carboniferous and Permian strata (Zheng et al. 2008). The strata in the study area, from early to late, are Cambrian, Ordovician, Carboniferous, Permian, and Lower Triassic (Figure 1). The main groundwater aquifers in the Huaibei coalfield can be divided into four categories from top to bottom by lithology, thickness and water bearing features. Uppermost is the Quaternary aquifer, which comprises conglomerate, sand, and clay. Next is the coal-bearing sandstone aquifer, which comprises sandstone, siltstone layers, and a coal seam. The limestone aquifer of the Taiyuan Formation in the Carboniferous, made of limestone, follows, and the deepest aquifer is the OA, which consists of gray or dark-gray thick-bedded limestone. In this study, we focused on the OA, which is found between 800 and 1,200 m deep. The Huaibei coalfield is divided into two categories by the Subei fault, the northern and southern mining areas. The northern mining area can be further divided into the Suixiao and Zhahe coal mines, and the southern mining area can be divided into the Suxian, Linhuan, and Guoyang coal mines. The faults or folds form the boundaries for the different coal mines.
Figure 1

Simple geological map of the Huaibei coalfield.

Figure 1

Simple geological map of the Huaibei coalfield.

Close modal

We collected 22 groundwater samples from the OA in the Huaibei coalfield. Every fifth sample was collected in duplicate so the analyses could be checked for accuracy. The samples were put into 2.5 L plastic barrels that had been rinsed 3 times with the groundwater, and the sampling location (longitude and latitude), temperature, pH, conductivity, and total dissolved solids (TDS) were all recorded at each site. Groundwater samples were collected from drainage holes in alleys, and were filtered through a 0.45-μm membrane into sterilized polyethylene bottles that had been cleaned following standard trace element cleaning procedures. All samples were analyzed for major ions and hydrogen and oxygen isotopes. Major ions were determined in the analytical laboratory of the Department of Coal Geology, Anhui Province, China. The K+ + Na+, and Cl, Ca2+ and Mg2+, and alkaline concentrations were determined by atomic absorption spectrometry, ion chromatography, EDTA titration, and acid-based titration, respectively. The isotopic compositions were determined in the laboratory of the National Engineering Research Center for the Control of Coal Mine Water Hazards. The isotopic data are reported relative to Standard Mean Ocean Water (SMOW), and the overall precisions of δ18O and δD were 0.2 and 2‰, respectively. The 14C concentrations in groundwater were tested with an ultra-low background liquid scintillation spectrometer (Quantulus 1200) in the Karst Geological Resource Environment Testing Center of the Land and Resources Ministry P.R.C.

Hydrochemical characteristics

Hydrochemical properties of the groundwater are presented in Table 1 and Figure 2. The ionic balance was verified with AqQa software. In general, the groundwater pH was between 7.10 and 10.80, with a mean of 9.07, indicating that the groundwater was alkaline. The TDS of groundwater ranged from 119 to 2,443 mg/l, with a mean value of 680.6 mg/l. In decreasing order, the mean cation and anion concentrations were ranked as K+ + Na+ > Ca2+ > Mg2+ and , respectively.
Table 1

Hydrochemical properties of groundwater from the OA in the Huaibei coalfield

No.K+ + Na+Ca2+Mg2+ClTDSpHD18OWater type14C
YZ-2 49.91 23.36 31.26 54.07 46.10 219.67 0.00 382.00 7.80 −55.21 −7.65 HCO3-Mg 2,660 ± 70 
YZ-3 11.82 100.9 23.94 34.89 44.86 373.44 0.00 505.00 7.10 −59.60 −8.21 HCO3-Ca  
ST2-3 22.55 98.28 42.99 40.12 114.84 353.92 0.00 639.00 7.80 −57.85 −8.01 HCO3-Ca  
Zhuz-1 6.65 82.58 33.38 27.45 55.98 318.07 0.00 410.00 7.80 −58.15 −7.99 HCO3-Ca  
YZ2-1 0.99 14.10 39.54 32.51 5.64 132.5 23.12 164.00 9.50 −56.07 −7.78 HCO3-Mg  
HY-3 48.30 8.86 32.24 24.42 46.10 158.65 28.81 247.00 9.30 −57.01 −7.89 HCO3-Mg  
LY-2 16.79 119.01 47.62 48.05 204.36 302.80 0.00 119.00 7.30 −59.72 −8.20 HCO3-Ca 7,940 ± 70 
LL-2 141.61 78.84 17.43 200.9 4.32 207.63 81.09 587.00 9.80 −42.76 −5.40 HCO3-Na  
TY-3 190.39 117.39 62.35 181.89 562.45 132.32 7.51 1,310.00 7.40 −60.23 −8.07 SO4-Na  
ZXZ-3 77.07 4.05 2.95 56.63 2.47 100.76 23.53 279.00 9.40 −50.57 −6.73 HCO3-Na  
QYZ-4 130.13 9.31 4.66 49.76 181.72 3.56 39.04 691.00 10.60 −47.98 −6.94 SO4-Na  
QD-3 62.78 5.67 12.8 32.60 42.39 43.26 32.54 276.00 10.50 −47.69 −6.50 CO3-Na  
QN-3 98.38 16.19 13.26 97.81 136.65 20.36 7.51 446.00 9.40 −55.80 −7.51 SO4-Na  
YL-4 227.88 48.34 19.05 150.01 445.35 4.88 9.60 1,040.00 9.90 −57.95 −7.71 SO4-Na  
ST-1 154.30 2.43 8.35 197.33 5.76 35.62 37.54 604.00 9.50 −63.73 −8.55 Cl-Na  
XT-4 136.17 3.22 19.05 169.20 9.06 36.61 62.42 555.00 10.20 −60.77 −8.28 Cl-Na  
RL-4 304.87 208.07 87.39 549.09 442.47 374.05 0.00 2,443.00 7.40 −64.32 −8.62 Cl-Na 10,040 ± 70 
TT-2 176.96 3.22 7.82 225.01 30.46 0.00 45.62 721.00 10.60 −55.78 −7.58 Cl-Na  
YY-3 284.55 47.77 61.86 389.51 313.64 142.49 0.00 1,420.00 8.00 −58.21 −7.47 Cl-Na  
YE-2 208.96 3.22 7.33 101.17 90.55 46.38 134.44 808.00 10.80 −57.51 −7.81 CO3-Na  
LD-1 281.82 3.24 13.75 192.18 196.74 155.22 45.05 970.00 9.90 −60.66 −7.96 HCO3-Na  
WG-1 67.76 6.44 24.95 81.98 7.82 141.57 26.41 356.00 9.60 −52.72 −6.80 Cl-Na  
No.K+ + Na+Ca2+Mg2+ClTDSpHD18OWater type14C
YZ-2 49.91 23.36 31.26 54.07 46.10 219.67 0.00 382.00 7.80 −55.21 −7.65 HCO3-Mg 2,660 ± 70 
YZ-3 11.82 100.9 23.94 34.89 44.86 373.44 0.00 505.00 7.10 −59.60 −8.21 HCO3-Ca  
ST2-3 22.55 98.28 42.99 40.12 114.84 353.92 0.00 639.00 7.80 −57.85 −8.01 HCO3-Ca  
Zhuz-1 6.65 82.58 33.38 27.45 55.98 318.07 0.00 410.00 7.80 −58.15 −7.99 HCO3-Ca  
YZ2-1 0.99 14.10 39.54 32.51 5.64 132.5 23.12 164.00 9.50 −56.07 −7.78 HCO3-Mg  
HY-3 48.30 8.86 32.24 24.42 46.10 158.65 28.81 247.00 9.30 −57.01 −7.89 HCO3-Mg  
LY-2 16.79 119.01 47.62 48.05 204.36 302.80 0.00 119.00 7.30 −59.72 −8.20 HCO3-Ca 7,940 ± 70 
LL-2 141.61 78.84 17.43 200.9 4.32 207.63 81.09 587.00 9.80 −42.76 −5.40 HCO3-Na  
TY-3 190.39 117.39 62.35 181.89 562.45 132.32 7.51 1,310.00 7.40 −60.23 −8.07 SO4-Na  
ZXZ-3 77.07 4.05 2.95 56.63 2.47 100.76 23.53 279.00 9.40 −50.57 −6.73 HCO3-Na  
QYZ-4 130.13 9.31 4.66 49.76 181.72 3.56 39.04 691.00 10.60 −47.98 −6.94 SO4-Na  
QD-3 62.78 5.67 12.8 32.60 42.39 43.26 32.54 276.00 10.50 −47.69 −6.50 CO3-Na  
QN-3 98.38 16.19 13.26 97.81 136.65 20.36 7.51 446.00 9.40 −55.80 −7.51 SO4-Na  
YL-4 227.88 48.34 19.05 150.01 445.35 4.88 9.60 1,040.00 9.90 −57.95 −7.71 SO4-Na  
ST-1 154.30 2.43 8.35 197.33 5.76 35.62 37.54 604.00 9.50 −63.73 −8.55 Cl-Na  
XT-4 136.17 3.22 19.05 169.20 9.06 36.61 62.42 555.00 10.20 −60.77 −8.28 Cl-Na  
RL-4 304.87 208.07 87.39 549.09 442.47 374.05 0.00 2,443.00 7.40 −64.32 −8.62 Cl-Na 10,040 ± 70 
TT-2 176.96 3.22 7.82 225.01 30.46 0.00 45.62 721.00 10.60 −55.78 −7.58 Cl-Na  
YY-3 284.55 47.77 61.86 389.51 313.64 142.49 0.00 1,420.00 8.00 −58.21 −7.47 Cl-Na  
YE-2 208.96 3.22 7.33 101.17 90.55 46.38 134.44 808.00 10.80 −57.51 −7.81 CO3-Na  
LD-1 281.82 3.24 13.75 192.18 196.74 155.22 45.05 970.00 9.90 −60.66 −7.96 HCO3-Na  
WG-1 67.76 6.44 24.95 81.98 7.82 141.57 26.41 356.00 9.60 −52.72 −6.80 Cl-Na  
Figure 2

Piper diagram of groundwater from the OA in the Huaibei coalfield.

Figure 2

Piper diagram of groundwater from the OA in the Huaibei coalfield.

Close modal

The groundwater types and hydrochemical characteristics were different for the various mining areas. The concentrations of Ca2+ and Mg2+ were higher in the Zhahe and Suixiao mining areas than in the other mining areas, and the groundwaters were the HCO3-Ca·Mg type. In the other coal mining areas, the Na+ + K+ contents were higher, and the groundwaters were mainly the Cl·SO4-Na type. Of the five coal mining areas, the TDS contents were highest in the Linhuan mining area, where the average value was 1,084 mg/l, and lowest in the Suixiao mining area, where the average value was 183 mg/l. The TDS contents in the Guobei, Taoyuan, and Zhahe mining areas were ranked second, third, and fourth, with average values of 663, 598, and 420 mg/l, respectively.

Isotopic characteristics

Previous studies have demonstrated that the D and 18O isotopes, which are stable in groundwater, can be used to trace the movement and evolution of groundwater (West et al. 2014). The δD and δ18O values in groundwater from the OA are shown in Table 1 and Figure 3. The concentrations of δD and δ18O in groundwater varied from −64.32‰ to −42.76‰, and from −8.62 to −5.40‰, with mean values of −56.38‰ and −7.62‰, respectively. The δD and δ18O contents in groundwater were different for the various coal-mining areas. The δD and δ18O values were highest in the Suxian coal-mining district, with averages of −50.84‰ and −6.86‰, respectively, and were lower in the Linhuan and Suixiao coal districts.
Figure 3

Variations of σD and σ18O in groundwater from the OA.

Figure 3

Variations of σD and σ18O in groundwater from the OA.

Close modal

Additional background data are needed to generate further information about the isotopic characteristics of groundwater. We used the global meteoric water line (GMWL), the local meteoric water line (LMWL), and the local surface water line (LSWL) for δD and δ18O as references. The GMWL was described by Craig (1961) as δD = 8*δ18O + 10.56, the LMWL was summarized as δD = 7.9*δ18O + 8.2 by Zhang (1989), and the LSWL was defined by Gui et al. (2005) as δD = 6.74*δ18O − 3.33. All the lines and isotopic signatures of the groundwater samples are shown in Figure 3. The plots of groundwater samples from the OA are distributed on the LSWL. The slope of distribution line is close to the LMWL, indicating that the groundwater was recharged by rainfall and surface water.

Ionic sources of water are generally complex, as they are influenced by both natural conditions and human activities. The deep groundwater, which remains in the aquifer for a long time, is particularly subject to the influence of water-rock interactions. A correlation between the TDS contents and isotopes (δD and δ18O) would indicate that the groundwater in OA was influenced by water-rock interactions. As shown in Figure 4, the stable isotope (δD and δ18O) concentrations generally decreased as the TDS contents increased, i.e., TDS and stable isotopes (δD and δ18O) were negatively correlated. This negative correlation showed that the water-rock interactions also controlled the δD and δ18O contents in groundwater, as reported in an earlier study (Chen et al. 2008).
Figure 4

Variations in the TDS-δD and TDS-δ18O of groundwater from the OA.

Figure 4

Variations in the TDS-δD and TDS-δ18O of groundwater from the OA.

Close modal

Groundwater age and evolution

The groundwater age is an important index of the renewal ability of the groundwater, and radioactive isotopes, such as 14C and 3H, are generally used to establish the age of the groundwater. The younger groundwater is more rapidly renewed than the older groundwater. Previous studies showed that 14C concentrations in water, which are affected by the dissolution of CO2 in the atmosphere, could be used to determine the water age. Thus, the 14C method can only be used for groundwater, and the upper and lower limits of dating range from 35,000a to 40,000a and from 500a to 1,000a, respectively (Aggarwal et al. 2014). To do this analysis, about 4 g of solid carbonate should be precipitated out of the groundwater, and then the carbonate should be used to determine the 14C by the liquid scintillation counting method. This means that, for this study area, each groundwater sample should have been about 60 liters. Because of limitations in the sampling conditions, we determined the 14C contents on only 3 such samples collected from the OA.

The 14C age of the groundwater in OA ranged from 2,660a to 10,040a, and the groundwater ages in the OA varied widely in the Huaibei coalfield. The groundwater was oldest in the Renlou coal mine in the Linhuan coal-mining district, which suggests that groundwater renewal and runoff were slow in that area. The groundwater was youngest in the Yangzhuang coal mine in the Zhahe coal-mining district, which indicates that the groundwater in this mine was renewed rapidly, and was mainly recharged by atmospheric precipitation. The OA is therefore recharged in the Zhahe coal-mining district.

Distribution in space

Changes in the hydrochemical composition of groundwater that occur during the circulation process can be deduced from water-rock interactions. The major ions, which are present at high concentrations in the surrounding rocks and are very reactive, are released into groundwater easily. As a comprehensive index of the solids concentrations in groundwater, TDS can reflect the groundwater runoff and circulation. In general, a low TDS value in groundwater indicates that the water supply is sufficient, and that the water-rock interactions are weak because of the short residence time in the aquifer. In a hydrogeological unit, groundwater flows from areas where the TDS is lower to where the TDS is higher. The intensity of the TDS contours reflect the degree of dissolution between groundwater and the surrounding rocks.

The TDS contour diagrams of groundwater, which give information about the characteristics of runoff, in the OA in the Huaibei coalfield are shown in Figure 5. In the study area, the TDS of groundwater increases from the north to the south, which shows that the groundwater runoff in OA is mainly from north to south. In the southern area, the groundwater runoff is from both the east and the west to the middle area. This information combined with information about the groundwater age suggests that the northern areas could be the recharge area of groundwater in the OA in the Huaibei coalfield. The Zhahe and Suixiao coal-mining districts are the main groundwater recharge areas, and the Linhuan coal-mining district is the main discharge area.
Figure 5

Contour map of TDS concentrations in groundwater from the OA in the Huaibei coalfield.

Figure 5

Contour map of TDS concentrations in groundwater from the OA in the Huaibei coalfield.

Close modal

The conventional chemical characteristics of the groundwater also provide evidence to support this view. In the Zhahe and Suixiao coal-mining districts, the groundwater is mainly the bicarbonate type, while the groundwaters in the Linhuan and Suxian coal-mining districts are mainly characterized by halide and sulfate, respectively. While there are clear differences in the distribution of groundwater hydrochemical characteristics, the chemical type changes from bicarbonate in the recharge area to sulfate and halide in the drainage area.

We determined the major ion, 14C, and hydrogen and oxygen isotope concentrations of 22 groundwater samples, collected from the OA in the Huaibei coalfield, China. We used traditional graphic analysis to examine the hydrochemistry characteristics, and groundwater runoff and age.

Our results showed that all the groundwater samples were alkaline, with pH values between 7.10 and 10.80. The range of the TDS contents was from 119 to 2,443 mg/l and the average was 680.6 mg/l. The groundwater from the different coal-mining districts had different characteristics. The concentrations of , Ca2+, and Mg2+ were high, and the TDS values were relatively low in groundwater from the Zhahe and Suixiao coal-mining districts. Groundwater from the Linhuan and Suxian coal-mining districts had high contents of Cl and , and higher TDS concentrations than the Zhahe and Suixiao coal-mining districts.

The δD and δ18O concentrations in groundwater varied from −64.32‰ to −42.76‰, and from −8.62 to −5.40‰, with mean values of −56.38‰ and −7.62‰, respectively. The δD and δ18O plots indicate that the groundwater is recharged by rainfall or surface water. The negative correlation between TDS and the isotopes (δD and δ18O) indicates that the hydrogen and oxygen concentrations in groundwater were influenced by the water-rock interactions.

The groundwater age in the OA, calculated from the 14C concentrations in groundwater, varied from 2,660a to 10,040a. The oldest and youngest groundwaters were collected from the Renlou and Yangzhuang coal mines, respectively. When this information was combined with the TDS contour diagrams, we found that the groundwater in the OA mainly flowed from the north to the south, with recharge mainly in the Zhahe and Suixiao coal-mining districts and discharge mainly in the Linhuan coal-mining district. The chemical type of groundwater changed from bicarbonate in the recharge area to sulfate and halide in the drainage area.

The study was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (41373095), the Natural Science Foundation of Anhui Province (1708085QE125) and the Postdoctoral Research Project of Anhui Province (2016B093).

Aggarwal
B. P. K.
Araguas-Araguas
L.
Choudhry
M.
Duren
M. V.
Froehlich
K.
2014
Lower groundwater 14C age by atmospheric CO2 uptake during sampling and analysis
.
Groundwater
52
(
1
),
20
24
.
Chen
L. W.
Gui
H. R.
Yin
X. X.
Qian
J. Z.
2008
Composing characteristics of 18O and D and current field in deep groundwater
.
Journal of China University of Mining & Technology
37
(
6
),
854
859
.
Currell
M.
Banfield
D.
Cartwright
I.
Cendon
D.
2016
Geochemical indicators of the origins and evolution of methane in groundwater: Gippsland Basin, Australia
.
Environmental Science and Pollution Research
1
16
.
doi: 10.1007/s11356-016-7290-0.
Gui
H. R.
Chen
L. W.
Song
X. M.
2005
Drift features of oxygen and hydrogen stable isotopes in deep groundwater in mining area of northern Anhui
.
Journal of Harbin Institute of Technology
37
,
111
114
(in Chinese)
.
Gui
H. R.
Sun
L. H.
Chen
L. W.
Chen
S.
2011
Rare earth element geochemistry of groundwater from a deep seated sandstone aquifer, northern Anhui province, China
.
Mining Science and Technology
21
,
477
482
.
Price
R. M.
Swart
P. K.
2006
Geochemical indicators of groundwater recharge in the surficial aquifer system, Everglades National Park, Florida, USA
.
Geological Society of America Special Papers
404
,
251
266
.
Zhang
H. P.
1989
Study on the background value of stable isotopes in precipitations of China
.
Site Investigation Science and Technology
1
,
6
13
(in Chinese)
.