Runoff and soil erosion are serious environmental issues in farmland management. In a field experiment in Xingmu, China, data from nine plots with different slopes and crops were collected, and the crops' leaf area index (LAI) used to represent the impact of vegetation on runoff and soil erosion. The results show that slope and crop both have significant effects on runoff and soil erosion, and that the LAI can indicate the effects of different crops.

  • The lack of research on soil and water loss of slope farmland affected by different crops will greatly affect the food security in Northeast China.

  • This paper studies the difference of soil and water loss under the action of rainfall in different crops with different slopes in the experimental plots.

  • The result can provide a theoretical reference for the use of soil and water conservation measures in slope farmland.

Accelerated soil erosion rate is a major cause of land degradation and unsustainable agriculture. It can lead to loss of soil fertility and reduce agricultural yield and, hence, farmers' incomes (Novara et al. 2013; Colazo & Buschiazzo 2015; Yan & Cai 2015). Soil erosion is also a serious and challenging environmental issue related to land management worldwide. It is a complex natural process altered by anthropogenic activities including land clearance, agricultural practices, surface mining, construction and urbanization (Krasa et al. 2005; Illangasinghe & Hewawasam 2013; Hewawasam & Illangasinghe 2015). Studies have shown that the key factors controlling soil erosion on hillslopes are erodibility, slope, and land use cover, and that changing these factors can reduce soil erosion (Diyabalanage et al. 2017).

High erosion rates from agriculture land are usually due to lack of vegetation cover, which is a key factor to understand in soil erosion (Ola et al. 2015; Zhao et al. 2016). The structure of soil without vegetation is easily broken by the impact of raindrops, increasing runoff and soil erosion rates (Cerdà 2000). Much research on runoff and soil erosion has been based on simulated natural rainfall in laboratories as the conditions are easier to control (Cerdà et al. 2016; Prosdocimi et al. 2017; Vaezi et al. 2017). There has also been research at field stations where conditions may be closer to natural (Tanner et al. 2016; Anache et al. 2017). Although there has been much work on runoff and soil erosion from agricultural land, comprehensive studies of the impacts of slope, rainfall intensity, rainfall and leaf area index (LAI) are uncommon.

Cultivation of sloping farmland is common in western and central Jilin Province, China. Excessive deforestation for farming, and serious disconnection between crop types and soil and water conservation measures, have caused severe soil erosion. It is very important, therefore, to study different crop types there. In this paper, the effects of rainfall, rainfall intensity, slope and LAI, on runoff and soil loss from sloping farmland are considered. Field experiments were carried out at Xingmu experimental station, Jilin, and the effects of different crops assessed on water and soil loss from farmland.

Study area

The study was carried out at the National Soil and Water Conservation Science and Technology Demonstration Park, Xingmu, south-central Jilin Province, China. Its coordinates are 42°17′40″ to 43°13′40″ N latitude and 124°51′22″ to 125°49′52″ E longitude. The soil is a clay loam, with 35.9% clay, 35.4% silt, and 28.7% sand, and bulk density 1.13 gm/ml. Annual sunshine typically exceeds 2,500 hours, the average temperature is 5.2 °C, and annual precipitation 658 mm. The experimental station is in a small watershed typical of the low mountain and hilly landform type, and is representative of the central part of Jilin Province.

Experimental plot design

The study area contains nine plots, each 5 m × 20 m and with slopes of 3°, 5°, and 8°, variously. At the bottom of each plot a measuring device (Figure 1) gathers runoff and soil from it. Equations (1) and (2) were used to calculate the runoff and soil loss. The experimental set up is shown in Table 1, each crop type being combined with three slopes. The rainfall and rainfall intensity data were measured using a field weather station on the experimental plot. Maize and soybean grow from May to September. Maize was planted on May 7, 2012 with ridge spacing 65 cm, plant spacing 30 cm and planting density 50,000/hm2. Soybean was planted on May 10, 2012 with ridge spacing 60 cm, plant spacing 7.5 cm and planting density 200,000/hm2.
(1)
where is the water depth (m); the soil depth (m); H the total depth (m); the density of water (gm/ml); the saturated soil density (gm/ml); A the device's base area (m2); and W the total weight (kg).
Table 1

Experimental set up

PlotSlope(°)Crop
Maize 
Soybeans 
Uncultivated 
Maize 
Soybeans 
Uncultivated 
Maize 
Soybeans 
Uncultivated 
PlotSlope(°)Crop
Maize 
Soybeans 
Uncultivated 
Maize 
Soybeans 
Uncultivated 
Maize 
Soybeans 
Uncultivated 
Figure 1

(a) Experimental plots and (b) soil loss and runoff measuring device.

Figure 1

(a) Experimental plots and (b) soil loss and runoff measuring device.

Close modal
From this the runoff and soil mass can be calculated:
(2)
where is the runoff mass; the saturated soil moisture content and the soil mass,.

Data analysis

The contribution of rainfall, rainfall intensity, slope, LAI, runoff, and soil loss for each plot was determined using the difference between the variables during the experimental runs. Comparison of the variables between the three crop types was done using the independent-samples t-test, and the effects of each on runoff and soil loss were determined using Pearson's correlation matrix (r).

The average annual rainfall from 1978 to 2008 and the rainfall in 2012, the year of the study, are shown in Figure 2(a), which shows that rainfall in 2012 basically conformed to the 30-year (1978–2008) annual average. The heaviest rainfall occurs in July and August, with rainfall intensity up to 78.31 mm/h (Figure 2(b)). The LAIs of maize and soybean were up to 3.73 and 5.69, respectively, and that of soybean always exceeds that of maize. The LAIs increased in the early period but began to decline later in the study (Figure 2(c)).

Figure 2

(a) Average annual rainfall from 1978 to 2008, with rainfall in 2012 superimposed; (b) rainfall and rainfall intensity from May to September 2012; and (c) experimental crop LAIs from May to September 2012.

Figure 2

(a) Average annual rainfall from 1978 to 2008, with rainfall in 2012 superimposed; (b) rainfall and rainfall intensity from May to September 2012; and (c) experimental crop LAIs from May to September 2012.

Close modal

The soil loss and runoff from the plots are shown in Figures 35. With increased slope, the amount of soil loss and runoff increased from the maize plots. When the slope of the soybean plots increases from 3 to 5°, the amount of soil loss and runoff does not change greatly, but it changes significantly when the slope increases to 8°. Compared with the same slopes on maize and soybean plots, the soil loss and runoff from uncultivated plots can be higher by two orders of magnitude or more.

Figure 3

Soil loss and runoff from maize plots with different slopes: (a) , (b) , (c) .

Figure 3

Soil loss and runoff from maize plots with different slopes: (a) , (b) , (c) .

Close modal
Figure 4

Soil loss and runoff from soybean plot with different slopes: (a) , (b) , (c) .

Figure 4

Soil loss and runoff from soybean plot with different slopes: (a) , (b) , (c) .

Close modal
Figure 5

Soil loss and runoff from uncultivated plots with different slopes: (a) , (b) , (c) .

Figure 5

Soil loss and runoff from uncultivated plots with different slopes: (a) , (b) , (c) .

Close modal

Table 2 shows significant positive correlation between soil loss, and rainfall intensity and slope, but there is no significant relationship between soil loss and rainfall. Only intense rainfall splashes much, destroying the soil structure and making it easier to move the soil away. Vaezi et al. (2017) showed that at 20 to 30 mm/h rainfall intensity, raindrop impact was the dominant factor controlling soil loss, while rainfall intensity below 20 mm/h has no significant soil erosion effect. Plant leaves can cushion the raindrops' fall, reducing splashing and thus soil loss (Römkens et al. 2002; Novara et al. 2011; Balota et al. 2016), and the correlation between soil loss and LAI is significantly negative (Table 2), so that the runoff from cultivated and uncultivated land is different. The steeper the slope, the more likely soil erosion is to occur, so the slope is positively correlated with soil erosion (Table 2) and this study's results are consistent with those of others (Defersha & Melesse 2012; Sajjadi & Mahmoodabadi 2015; Mahmoodabadi & Sajjadi 2016).

Table 2

Correlations between runoff, soil loss, amount of rainfall, rainfall intensity, slope and LAI

Soil lossRunoffRainfallRainfall intensitySlopeLAI
Soil loss 1.0000 0.0522 −0.0244 0.6993a 0.5007a −0.4577a 
Runoff  1.0000 0.7517a 0.0616 0.4592a −0.3165b 
Rainfall   1.0000 0.0745 0.0000 0.0091 
Rainfall intensity    1.0000 0.0000 0.0156 
Slope     1.0000 0.0065 
LAI      1.0000 
Soil lossRunoffRainfallRainfall intensitySlopeLAI
Soil loss 1.0000 0.0522 −0.0244 0.6993a 0.5007a −0.4577a 
Runoff  1.0000 0.7517a 0.0616 0.4592a −0.3165b 
Rainfall   1.0000 0.0745 0.0000 0.0091 
Rainfall intensity    1.0000 0.0000 0.0156 
Slope     1.0000 0.0065 
LAI      1.0000 

aP < 0.05; bP < 0.1.

The relationship between different crops, and runoff and soil loss on different slopes, is shown in Table 3. During the experiments, the runoff and soil loss from uncultivated land were much higher than from cultivated plots, and soybeans gave better protection from runoff and soil loss than maize on the same slopes.

Table 3

Total soil loss and runoff from trial plots during the experimental period

Slope
Soil loss (kg) Maize 2.465 6.667 16.533 
Bean 1.967 1.991 8.154 
Uncultivated 64.540 76.338 359.030 
Runoff (L) Maize 352.592 467.076 1,217.678 
Bean 173.852 521.494 928.509 
Uncultivated 1,030.706 802.381 3,523.614 
Slope
Soil loss (kg) Maize 2.465 6.667 16.533 
Bean 1.967 1.991 8.154 
Uncultivated 64.540 76.338 359.030 
Runoff (L) Maize 352.592 467.076 1,217.678 
Bean 173.852 521.494 928.509 
Uncultivated 1,030.706 802.381 3,523.614 

The study revealed the variation in runoff and soil erosion on different slopes under different crops in a small watershed in Xingmu. Both the slope and crop have significant effects, and the effect of the crop can be indicated by its LAI. Soybeans have a better effect on soil erosion than maize, as soybean's LAI is greater. The crop type should be considered when solving runoff and soil erosion problems.

All relevant data are included in the paper or its Supplementary Information.

Anache
J. A.
Wendland
E. C.
Oliveira
P. T.
Flanagan
D. C.
Nearing
M. A.
2017
Runoff and soil erosion plot-scale studies under natural rainfall: a meta-analysis of the Brazilian experience
.
Catena
152
,
29
39
.
Balota
E. L.
Machineski
O.
Honda
C.
Yada
I. F.
Barbosa
G. M.
Nakatani
A. S.
Coyne
M. S.
2016
Response of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi in different soil tillage systems to long-term swine slurry application
.
Land Degradation & Development
27
(
4
),
1141
1150
.
Cerdà
A.
González-Pelayo
Ó.
Giménez-Morera
A.
Jordán
A.
Pereira
P.
Novara
A.
Orenes
F. G.
2016
Use of barley straw residues to avoid high erosion and runoff rates on persimmon plantations in Eastern Spain under low frequency–high magnitude simulated rainfall events
.
Soil Research
54
(
2
),
154
165
.
Colazo
J. C.
Buschiazzo
D.
2015
The impact of agriculture on soil texture due to wind erosion
.
Land Degradation & Development
26
(
1
),
62
70
.
Novara
A.
Gristina
L.
Saladino
S. S.
Santoro
A.
Cerdà
A.
2011
Soil erosion assessment on tillage and alternative soil managements in a Sicilian vineyard
.
Soil and Tillage Research
117
,
140
147
.
Novara
A.
Gristina
L.
Guaitoli
F.
Santoro
A.
Cerdà
A.
2013
Managing soil nitrate with cover crops and buffer strips in Sicilian vineyards
.
Solid Earth
4
(
2
),
255
262
.
Prosdocimi
M.
Burguet
M.
Di Prima
S.
Sofia
G.
Terol
E.
Comino
J. R.
Cerdà
A.
Tarolli
P.
2017
Rainfall simulation and Structure-from-Motion photogrammetry for the analysis of soil water erosion in Mediterranean vineyards
.
Science of the Total Environment
574
,
204
215
.
Tanner
S.
Katra
I.
Haim
A.
Zaady
E.
2016
Short-term soil loss by eolian erosion in response to different rain-fed agricultural practices
.
Soil and Tillage Research
155
,
149
156
.
Zhao
C.
Gao
J. E.
Huang
Y.
Wang
G.
Zhang
M.
2016
Effects of vegetation stems on hydraulics of overland flow under varying water discharges
.
Land Degradation & Development
27
(
3
),
748
757
.