Abstract
Based on graphitic carbon nitride (CN) nanosheets, a novel MnO2 modified magnetic graphitic carbon nitride composite (MMCN) was prepared via magnetization and in-situ deposition of MnO2. Then, an array of characterizations and experiments were conducted to explore the physical and chemical properties of the synthesized MMCN material. The adsorption behavior and removal mechanism of the MMCN were also discussed intensively. The best pH value of Pb(II) of MMCN was 6. The maximum adsorption capacity of MMCN was as high as 187.6 mg/g, which was much higher than that of MCN and original CN, and removal percentage of Pb(II) was about 99%. The adsorption kinetics and isotherms were in accordance with the pseudo-second-order model and Langmuir model, respectively. The chemical adsorption of Pb(II) indicated that MMCN was a successful modified sorbent and pretty efficient to remove Pb(II) in an aqueous medium owing to the complexation and ion exchange of ample amino and hydroxyl groups. Moreover, MMCN could be separated easily from the aqueous medium under an external field after reaction with its magnetic performance.
HIGHLIGHTS
A novel MnO2 modified magnetic graphitic carbon nitride composite (MMCN) was prepared.
The maximum adsorption capacity of MMCN toward Pb(II) was 187.6 mg/g and removal percentage of Pb(II) was around 99%.
Characterization and batch experiments were conducted to investigate adsorption mechanism.
The MMCN was a successful modified adsorbent and efficient to remove Pb(II) in aqueous medium.
INTRODUCTION
As one of the most critical resources, water is of enough significance for all creatures. However, much industrial and municipal waste water frequently contains various metal ions and this seriously exceeds the natural degradation capacity of ecology, having a fatal effect on the whole environment (Xu et al. 2018). Especially, Pb(II), a common heavy metal ion applied widely in the manufacturing field, can induce neurophysical disorders in children, even with a lead content in blood below 10 μg/dL (Uberoi & Shadman 1990; Safruk et al. 2017). The adsorption method, which is simple and inexpensive, has been considered as a promising approach to address the issue (Bailey et al. 1999; Ngah et al. 2011; Uddin 2017).
Among the alternative materials, graphitized carbon nitride (CN) has been considered as a promising material in research. The basic skeleton of CN is a kind of poly (3-S-triazine) rich in nitrification defects. The s-triazine ring of CN is a conjugated 2-D polymer structure and easy to form a p-conjugated planar layer (Amiri et al. 2016), which offers an excellent chemical and thermal stability. Noticing that the basic functional groups of the CN surface are mainly amino groups, they can bring numerous binding sites and capture Pb(II) quickly and accurately by complexation and ion-exchanged behavior (Zou et al. 2016). However, the original CN can only offer limited reactive sites, and it is difficult to separate from waste water owing to its high dispersion. Researches have shown that the introduction of some compatible materials is an effective method to conquer the conundrum (Guo et al. 2019a).
Herein, manganese dioxide (MnO2) modified magnetic graphitic carbon nitride composite (MMCN) was prepared via in-situ deposition and applied in solution for Pb(II) removal. MnO2 is chosen as the potential to add into the CN material for the remediation of lead cations. MnO2 is a transition metal oxide with advantages of low-cost, good stability, and environmental compatibility (Moghaddam & Pakizeh 2015; Xiong et al. 2018). Especially, MnO2 possesses a point of zero charge of ca.2.0 and has a large surface area with ample –OH groups (Murray 1975; Gheju et al. 2016; Zhao et al. 2016), which can provide numerous active sites for Pb(II) in a wide range of pH > 2.0. Moreover, ferroferric oxide (Fe3O4) is also chosen as a modifier added to CN material because of its excellent performance separating from solution with an external electric field (Rajput et al. 2016; Zhou et al. 2018; Li et al. 2019).
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Materials
MMCN and MCN were prepared from analytical-reagent grade melamine (C3N3(NH2)3), manganese sulfate monohydrate (MnSO4·H2O), ferric chloride (FeCl3) and ferrous sulfate heptahydrate (FeSO4·7H2O). Lead source was confirmed as nitrate (Pb(NO3)2). They were obtained from Tianjin Kermel and Sinopharm. Potassium permanganate (KMnO4) and the remaining materials were purchased in Macklin. All water used in the experiment was purified deionized water.
Methods
The obtained adsorbent was characterized by a variety of techniques. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM, VEGA3SBH, CZE) was used to determine the morphology of samples. The surface functional groups of samples were determined by Fourier transform infrared spectrometer (FTIR, Nicolet 6700, USA). Powder X-ray Diffraction (XRD) specimen samples were characterized by Bruker Advance D8 diffractograph with Cu (Kα) radiation. The surface chemistry of MMCN and the adsorbed MMCN samples were determined using X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS, Escalab 250, USA). The specific surface area and porosity of samples were analyzed at 77 K by Brunauer-Emmett-Teller (BET, JW-BK132F, China). At room temperature, the potential changes of MMCN samples were detected using the Zeta potential analyzer (DELSA 440SX, USA). Vibration sample magnetometer (VSM, MPMS XL-7, USA) tested the magnetic properties of MMCN samples. And properties of MMCN composite for Pb(II) adsorption was evaluated by the experimental studies. Removal mechanism of the adsorbents were also confirmed to evaluate the application of Pb(II) on MMCN.
Preparation of materials
Preparation of CN, MCN and MMCN
Through the typical pyrolysis method (Guo et al. 2019a), CN was prepared in following steps. 12 g of melamine powder was put in a copple and roasted at 550 °C for 3 h in atmosphere. After cooling up the faint yellow bulk to room temperature, it was washed with water and ethanol for times and dried it at 323 K for 24 h, and ground the bulk into powder for spare finally.
The MCN composite was synthesized through in-situ deposition of Fe3O4 particles on the surface of CN. The detailed procedures are described as follows. Under an atmosphere of nitrogen, 1.00 g as-preparation CN, 1.20 g FeSO4·7H2O and 2.32 g FeCl3·6H2O were mixed in 80 ml deionized water and the mixture was stirred for 30 min. Then NH3·H2O solution (30%, v/v) was added in drops until the pH value of aqueous was 10.0. The suspension continued to be stirred for 2 h at 353 K. After filtering, washing and drying the products, the black solids were collected by a magnet.
Adsorption properties
- (1)
Different adsorbents and dosage:
CN, MCN and MMCN were conducted here as the adsorbent for Pb(II), 0.02 g adsorbent was added into a conical flask contained 40 mL Pb(II) solution (50 mg/L). To study the effect of dose, MMCN dosages of 0.25–2 g/L were added 40 mL Pb(II) solution at 100 mg/L.
- (2)
Effect of pH value on adsorption:
The pH of the solution was adjusted by 0.1 mol/L HNO3 and 0.1 mol/L NaOH solutions to 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, respectively. and 0.02 g MMCN was added into a conical flask with a Pb(II) concentration of 100 mg/L. The pH of the solution was the solution was vibrated for 270 min at 298 K and 170 r/min. The concentration of Pb(II) in the supernatant after adsorption equilibrium was measured and calculated by ultraviolet spectrophotometry. Each sample was repeated at least 3 times.
- (3)
Adsorption kinetics:
The effect of contact time between 0 and 270 min of Pb(II) on different adsorbents were investigated at 298 K, and the initial concentration of the Pb(II) solution was 30, 100, 250 mg/L and the pH was 6.0. The concentration of Pb(II) in the supernatant was measured and calculated at different contact time.
- (4)
Adsorption isotherms:
The adsorption isotherm of Pb(II) on MMCN was studied at 298, 308 and 318 K. 0.02 g MMCN were added to 40 mL Pb(II) solution at concentration of 20–180 mg/L for 270 min at 170 r/min, respectively. After adsorption equilibrium, the concentration of Pb(II) in the supernatant was measured and calculated.
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
Characterizations of materials
The surface morphology of CN, MCN and MMCN were observed by SEM. As shown in Figure 2, CN had an aggregated, layered and irregular plate-like structure, which was consistent with the reported literature (Guo et al. 2019b). Differently from the smooth surface of CN, the MCN was composed of many bulk particles and possessed a non-smooth surface morphology. Clearly, many nanoparticles were found on the surface of MMCN, which could be due to the appearance of MnO2 on the outer surface of MCN. As for the EDS elemental mapping of MCN and MMCN, the Fe and Mn were uniformly distributed in the synthesized MCN and MMCN material, which proved the mass deposition of Fe3O4 on CN, MnO2 in MMCN and the successful modification of CN.
To further understand the microstructures of CN, MCN and MMCN, the BET characterization of the two materials was studied and is shown in Figure 3 and Table 1, which implied a IV type isotherm and a H4 type hysteresis loop according to the classification of IUPAC, meaning a mixture of microporous and mesoporous adsorbent. Obviously, the surface area of MMCN (262.78 m2/g) was much larger than that of MCN (16.45 m2/g) and the original CN (5.47 m2/g). MMCN pores were mainly distributed within the mesoporous range with centered pore diameter of 4.89 nm. Generally speaking, higher specific surface area offered more sorption sites for Pb(II) (Li et al. 2018a). The corresponding pore size distribution plots suggested the MMCN composite had more pores than single CN, which could provide an interchange channel for adsorption. The increased surface area and numerous mesopores would be momentous to the sorption process.
Material . | BET surface area (m2/g) . | BJH pore volume (cm3/g) . | BJH pore diameter (nm) . |
---|---|---|---|
CN | 5.47 | 0.026 | 39.94 |
MCN | 16.45 | 0.283 | 16.45 |
MMCN | 262.78 | 0.443 | 4.89 |
Material . | BET surface area (m2/g) . | BJH pore volume (cm3/g) . | BJH pore diameter (nm) . |
---|---|---|---|
CN | 5.47 | 0.026 | 39.94 |
MCN | 16.45 | 0.283 | 16.45 |
MMCN | 262.78 | 0.443 | 4.89 |
The FTIR spectra of CN, MCN and MMCN are presented in Figure 4(a) as the importance of functional groups in sorption. The characteristic peak at 806 cm−1, which belonged to the triazine units of CN, was observed in the spectra of all adsorbents and several peaks in the range of 1,100 and 1,700 cm−1 were the typical stretching vibrations of tri-s-triazine derivatives (Tian et al. 2016), which indicated that MCN and MMCN retained the structure of tri-s-triazine in CN after modification. The significant band at ca. 588 cm−1 in the FTIR spectrum of MCN could be assigned to Fe-O (Shi et al. 2018), signalling the formation of Fe3O4 on the CN. For MMCN, a new peak was observed at 516 cm−1, which was due to the stretching of the Mn-O bond (Dubal et al. 2011). Moreover, the broad peak at 3,000–3,500 cm−1 mainly represented the stretching vibration behavior of amino (-NH and –NH2) and -OH groups (Tian et al. 2016; Zhang et al. 2019). Noticing the band at 3,000–3,500 cm−1, the central peak of MMCN had a significant shift compared to that of MCN and CN, which suggested enhancement of hydrogen band interaction owing to the appearance of more functional groups (Zhou et al. 2017). The results illustrated that magnetization and modification had been conducted successfully and the process occurred probably through chemical deposition.
The XRD patterns of the CN, MCN, MMCN and MMCN-Pb composite are presented in Figure 4(b). The strong peaks at 13.0° (100) and 27.5° (002) in the XRD spectra of CN indicated an excellent crystallinity. The typical peaks of CN were also observed in the other three materials, which illustrated the structural stability of CN. The characteristic peaks of MCN at 2θ = 30.5° (220), 35.9° (311), 43.6° (400), 53.5° (422), 57.4° (511), and 63.0° (440) were attributed to the typical crystal faces of Fe3O4 (Chen et al. 2019). As for MMCN, the peaks at 12.3°, 18.6°, 36.9° and 65.7° (PDF 18-0802) belonging to MnO2 were found in the spectra, which could be attributed to the cover of mass MnO2 on the surface of MCN and the characteristic peaks of Fe3O4 were more obscure than before. The results were fully consistent with that of FTIR. In the XRD pattern of MMCN-Pb composite, some weak but noteworthy peaks were found at 32°, 36.8°, 52.7°, 62.6° and 65.6° (PDF 03-1156), which suggested the presence of Pb in crystal character and successful adsorption of lead onto MMCN.
Magnetic responsivity was a conspicuous characteristic of magnetic materials. Figure 4(c) shows the magnetic hysteresis loop of MMCN and the saturation magnetization value of 44 emu/g, implying that the MMCN composite could be isolated from aqueous medium easily after adsorption by an external ordinary magnet, just as expressed in the inset picture. The loop of MMCN was without any hysteresis and symmetrical about the origin, which meant that the superparamagnetism of MMCN could meet the demand of magnetic separation from aqueous medium. The MMCN material, with excellent separation property, provided a sustainable site for the remediation of heavy metal.
The XPS survey spectra of MMCN and MMCN-Pb composite are shown in Figure 4(d). We could see Pb 4d and Pb 4f peaks in the XPS survey of MMCN-Pb while not appearing in that of MMCN, which indicated the existence of divalent Pb on the surface of MMCN after loading (Xu et al. 2013). The spectrum of Pb 4f in Figure 5(f) exhibited that two characteristic peaks at 143.4 and 138.5eV were assigned to Pb 4f5/2 and Pb 4f5/2, respectively. Two peaks at 654.3 and 642.5eV for Mn 2p1/2 and Mn 2p3/2 (Figure 5(d)) spin − orbit suggested the chemical state of Mn as Mn (IV) (Li et al. 2018b), while the weak shift of the peak after adsorption was due to the interruption of Pb(II) (Liang et al. 2017). From the XPS result of Fe 2p in Figure 5(e), the calculated Fe2+/Fe3+ ratios of the MMCN before and after adsorption were around 0.5, which indicated the existence of Fe3O4 in composite (Zhao et al. 2016). As shown in Figure 5(a), three intense peaks were identified at ca. 288.6/288.5eV, 286.2/286.7eV and 284.7/284.9eV, which correspond to the sp2 C-N bond, C-O bond and the sp2 hybrid carbon on the N-containing aromatic ring N = C-N, respectively (Wu et al. 2019). The XPS spectra of N 1s (Figure 5(b)) could be divided into two peaks at around 399.0 ev and 401.0 ev, the N 1s binding energy of MMCN-Pb showed an obviously higher peak than that of MMCN, which could be attributed to the coordination of N with Pb (Li et al. 2018a). Meanwhile, the O 1s (Figure 5(c)) peaks in MMCN material exhibited a contrary change after load of Pb(II), indicating an interactive effect between MMCN and lead. There was a peak at ca.530eV in the high resolution of O 1s, which could be attributed to Fe-O-Fe and Mn-O-Mn (Zhao et al. 2016). The ratio of the integral area of the surface hydroxyl oxygen (ca. 531eV) to the total oxygen decreased from 9.64% to 6.92% after Pb(II) adsorption, indicating that the surface hydroxyl was related to the Pb(II) adsorption process (López-Muñoz et al. 2016). In conclusion, the adsorption force of Pb (II) on MMCN is a chemical process and mainly related to ample hydroxyl and amino groups on the exterior of MMCN.
Effect of adsorbent dosage and pH
A series of experiments about the effect factors including different adsorbents, adsorbent dosage and initial pH in aqueous medium on the Pb(II) removal were conducted and the data are exhibited in Figure 6. In Figure 6(a), the capacity of MMCN to Pb(II) was as high as 127.19 mg/g, which was much higher than that of CN and MCN, showing an excellent effect of modification. Distinctly in Figure 6(b), with the increasing dosage of MMCN from 0.25 to 2.0 g/L, the removal percentage of Pb(II) increased gradually and stabilized at around 99%. Instead, the adsorption capacity negatively correlated with MMCN content. Considering to the experimental loss, the optimal dosage of MMCN was 1.0 g/L.
pH value is another effective factor of adsorption capacity, as shown in Figure 4(d). In the pH range of 2–8, the capacity rose sharply when pH < 4, increased slowly at pH 4–6 and finally reached a plateau at 6–8. The phenomenon could be explained by the surface charge of MMCN and the species distribution of Pb in aqueous medium. The pHPZC of the MMCN was confirmed at around 4.63. When pH < 4, lower than pHPZC, the positive charge of MMCN induced by protonation would bring electrostatic repulsion between MMCN and Pb(II) and the ample H+ would compete with Pb(II) to unite with negative groups on the surface MMCN. With the pH value increasing, the electrostatic repulsion became weaker and Pb(II) became the dominant species of lead when the pH was lower than 6. As the pH value continued to grow, the lead started to precipitate based on the species distribution of lead obtained from Visual MINTEQ (ver.3.0.). Considering all above results, pH = 6 was chosen as the optimum pH.
Adsorption kinetics study
A bunch of experiments were carried out to study the effect of initial concentration and contact time on MMCN adsorption for Pb(II). From data in Figure 7(a), the adsorption quantity of MMCN rose rapidly in the first 20 min and the rate slowed down 50 min later. Finally, the adsorption equilibrium was approached at around 90 min. The higher rate at the start was relevant to the higher concentration of Pb(II) and the existence of abundant active sites, which indicated that chemical adsorption occurred primarily in the process. In order to further study the practical application of the sorption, the pseudo-first-order and pseudo-second-order models were chosen to simulate the adsorption kinetic. Both of the linear fitting curves and correlative parameters are presented in Figure 7(b) and 7(c) and Table 2. As shown, the adsorption capacity worked out by the pseudo-second-order model was more relevant to the experimental converts compared with the former, and the correlation coefficient close to 1 suggested that the pseudo-second-order model was more satisfying to approach the actual adsorption kinetics. These results reflected that adsorption was really a chemical process which involved valence forces between adsorbents and metal ions (Liu et al. 2019).
C0 (mg/L) . | Qexp (mg/g) . | Pseudo-first-order . | Pseudo-second-order . | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Qcal (mg/g) . | k1 (min−1) . | R2 . | Qcal (mg/g) . | k2 (min·mg/g) . | R2 . | ||
30 | 54.17 | 14.42 | 0.016 | 0.92 | 54.76 | 0.0038 | 0.9997 |
100 | 115.82 | 30.11 | 0.020 | 0.69 | 117.92 | 0.0018 | 0.9998 |
250 | 147.81 | 38.32 | 0.017 | 0.72 | 149.70 | 0.0014 | 0.9996 |
C0 (mg/L) . | Qexp (mg/g) . | Pseudo-first-order . | Pseudo-second-order . | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Qcal (mg/g) . | k1 (min−1) . | R2 . | Qcal (mg/g) . | k2 (min·mg/g) . | R2 . | ||
30 | 54.17 | 14.42 | 0.016 | 0.92 | 54.76 | 0.0038 | 0.9997 |
100 | 115.82 | 30.11 | 0.020 | 0.69 | 117.92 | 0.0018 | 0.9998 |
250 | 147.81 | 38.32 | 0.017 | 0.72 | 149.70 | 0.0014 | 0.9996 |
Qexp, the adsorption quantity of MMCN from experiment.
Qcal, the adsorption quantity of MMCN from calculation through fitting curve.
Isotherms and thermodynamic studies of reaction
T (K) . | Langmuir isotherm . | Freundlich isotherm . | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Qm(mg/g) . | kL(L/mg) . | R2 . | RL . | kf(mg/g) . | R2 . | |
298 | 150.2 | 0.704 | 0.9992 | 0.006–0.045 | 1.95 | 0.8992 |
308 | 165.8 | 0.758 | 0.9986 | 0.005–0.042 | 2.15 | 0.7853 |
318 | 187.6 | 0.974 | 0.9995 | 0.004–0.033 | 2.23 | 0.7844 |
T (K) . | Langmuir isotherm . | Freundlich isotherm . | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Qm(mg/g) . | kL(L/mg) . | R2 . | RL . | kf(mg/g) . | R2 . | |
298 | 150.2 | 0.704 | 0.9992 | 0.006–0.045 | 1.95 | 0.8992 |
308 | 165.8 | 0.758 | 0.9986 | 0.005–0.042 | 2.15 | 0.7853 |
318 | 187.6 | 0.974 | 0.9995 | 0.004–0.033 | 2.23 | 0.7844 |
The value of RL can be used to reveal the feasibility of the reaction. There are four situations: one of them is 0 < RL < 1, which means favorable; and the bigger the RL, the better for the removal. From what is shown in Table 3, the obtained RL values implied the adsorption of Pb(II) on MMCN was favorable.
Here is a comparison of adsorption conditions and capacity of different adsorbent agents with that in the work. From the data in Table 4, it is clear to see a better effect of the MMCN than other previous adsorbents in similar studies. So, the MMCN adsorption is an effective and promising method to remove Pb(II) from aqueous medium.
Adsorbents . | pH . | T(K) . | Adsorption capacity(mg/g) . | References . |
---|---|---|---|---|
FAAS | 6.0 | / | 32.48 | Lu et al. (2016) |
SDAC | 6.5–8.0 | 303 ± 2 | 46.70 | Sreejalekshmi et al. (2009) |
White pottery clay | 5.5 | 293 | 159.24 | Li et al. (2020) |
MWCNTs | 5.0 | 298 | 91.00 | Wang et al. (2007) |
Pb(II)-IIP | / | 298 | 33.15 | Ao & Guan (2017) |
Pb-ICB | / | 303 | 177.62 | Jing et al. (2016) |
MMCN | 6.0 | 318 | 187.6 | This work |
Adsorbents . | pH . | T(K) . | Adsorption capacity(mg/g) . | References . |
---|---|---|---|---|
FAAS | 6.0 | / | 32.48 | Lu et al. (2016) |
SDAC | 6.5–8.0 | 303 ± 2 | 46.70 | Sreejalekshmi et al. (2009) |
White pottery clay | 5.5 | 293 | 159.24 | Li et al. (2020) |
MWCNTs | 5.0 | 298 | 91.00 | Wang et al. (2007) |
Pb(II)-IIP | / | 298 | 33.15 | Ao & Guan (2017) |
Pb-ICB | / | 303 | 177.62 | Jing et al. (2016) |
MMCN | 6.0 | 318 | 187.6 | This work |
CONCLUSION
A new adsorbent named MMCN for Pb(II) was prepared via magnetization and in-situ deposition of MnO2. An array of characterizations and experiments were conducted to explore the synthesized MMCN material and removal behavior toward Pb(II). The adsorption kinetics, thermodynamics and removal mechanisms of the MMCN were also analyzed. The maximum adsorption capacity of MMCN for Pb(II) was as high as 187.6 mg/g, which was much higher than that of the original CN, and removal percentage of Pb(II) was around 99%. These results indicated that MMCN was pretty efficient to remove Pb(II) in aqueous medium by complexation and ion exchange with ample amino and hydroxyl. Moreover, MMCN could be separated easily under an external field after reaction because of its magnetic performance.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
This study was supported by the Postgraduate Independent Exploration and Innovation Project of Central South University, China (No. 206021711) and the Key Research and Development Project of Hunan Province, China (No. 2019KW2031).
CONFLICT OF INTEREST
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interests.
DATA AVAILABILITY STATEMENT
All relevant data are included in the paper or its Supplementary Information.