Abstract
The Lower Manyame Sub-catchment (LMS) is one of the most heavily polluted in Zimbabwe. Its waters are valuable for irrigation, domestic and industrial purposes. LMS has serious eutrophication problems emanating from human activities within it, and lakes Manyame and Chivero upstream. Data collected from October 2018 to April 2019 were used to test an integrated methodology based on field measurements and remote sensing. This study illustrates the production of multitemporal spatialised maps of total suspended solids (TSS), chemical oxygen demand (COD), total nitrogen (TN) and total phosphorus (TP) concentrations from satellite data acquired from Sentinel-2. The analysis confirmed the pollution (eutrophic and organic matter) status of LMS water, for the period considered by this research. As a result, careful land planning must be done through the joint operation of local authorities, regional agencies and regional institutions, since Manyame River is a tributary of the Zambezi River (a transboundary river).
HIGHLIGHTS
Lower Manyame Sub-catchment rivers are vulnerable to nutrient loading.
This research established high phosphorous loading in the sub-catchment.
Field data and Sentinel-2 data analysis confirmed pollution levels in LMS.
High-resolution satellite data can be used to monitor surface water quality.
Graphical Abstract
INTRODUCTION
Large-scale water quality cannot be estimated correctly without suitable data acquisition. On the other hand, the application of field-based approaches, based only on frequent and/or long-term samples, cannot fully address the spatio-temporal variation of water quality in a given watershed/catchment. As a result, water monitoring, conservation and reclamation programmes need an integrated approach where long-term field-based data can be used in conjunction with cutting-edge technologies (Azanga et al. 2016; Sharma et al. 2018). It is important to collect water quality data and information when formulating and implementing pollution rehabilitation (Barrett & Frazier 2016; Meyer et al. 2019). Water quality monitoring is, therefore, mainly aimed at providing regular feedback to guarantee compliance with national and international water quality standards, and efficiency and effectiveness in law enforcement by different natural resources custodians.
Integrating traditional data collection with remote sensing techniques produces an efficient approach for monitoring (Azab 2012; Alikas & Kratzer 2017; Bugnot et al. 2018). However, traditional approaches are characterised by tiring and time-consuming fieldwork activities, thus not enabling an exhaustive description of the water bodies' quality. In addition, field-based data quality can depend on both sampling procedures and laboratory protocols (Gürsoy & Atun 2019). Sources of uncertainty include, for example, geo-location and transcription mistakes in field notes. Data acquisition by remote sensing and geographical information systems (empirical algorithms) is now common to enable rapid detection of fast changes and trends in water quality indicators in a catchment (Ortiz-Casas & Peña-Martinez 1989; Cox et al. 1998; Mushtaq & Nee Lala 2017). Remote-sensing-based empirical algorithms must be calibrated accurately in relation to the study area, while remote sensing data are also weather dependent (Gholizadeh & Melesse 2017). Remote sensing has been used to assess water quality parameters in several lakes and reservoirs, nonetheless, as it can provide spatial and multitemporal information about the topmost layers of water bodies very cost-effectively. As remote sensing data are freely available, integrated approaches based on traditional field-based data collection and remote sensing are now commonly seen as suitable for water resource monitoring programs.
Sentinel-2 is a high-resolution, optical, land-mission, twin-satellite system providing 12-bit imagery in 13 spectral bands, ranging from 443 to 2,190 nm (Bande & Adam 2018). Sentinel-2A has operated since 2015 and 2B since 2017, viewing the earth's entire surface every one to two days. Data are acquired at three spatial resolutions (10, 20 and 60 m), within a viewing width of 290 km. The 10 m resolution dataset has not been used widely in studies assessing the quality in water bodies or land use land cover changes. While other satellite images – e.g., from Landsat, MERIS, MODIS, etc – have been used widely in assessing and monitoring the environment and water quality (Campbell et al. 2011; Andrzej et al. 2016; El-Zeiny & El-Kafrawy 2017; Mushtaq & Nee Lala 2017; Feng et al. 2019), such use of Sentinel-2 data is still in its infancy.
Correlations of satellite reflectance bands with field-based sample data have been in use for years (Meer 2001; Gholizadeh et al. 2016a; Deng 2019). Not all water quality parameters interact directly with the electromagnetic spectrum and yet they must be monitored. Unlike total suspended solids (TSS), chlorophyll-a/cyanobacteria and temperature, monitoring of parameters such as total nitrogen (TN), total phosphorus (TP) and biochemical oxygen demand (BOD) was challenging until correlational approaches were developed. This arises because, on the whole, only physical, rather than chemical, parameters interact directly with the electromagnetic spectrum. Many attempts have been made to establish correlations between field-based water quality data and remote-sensing reflectance band ratios (Gao et al. 2015; Gholizadeh et al. 2016b; Carstens & Amer 2019). The correlations vary from single bands, to band ratios, to complex linear regression models, and rigorous literature reviews are needed to find those algorithms that might suit an area of interest, so that the models can be calibrated and validated accordingly. Model selection must be based on model performance, as assessed by a research-based criterion. Among the criteria that can be employed are consideration of the mean root error (MRE) or coefficient of determination (R2), and choosing an algorithm developed in a region similar to that of interest (Azab 2012; Altansukh 2016).
Experience of using the integrated approach for water quality monitoring in the Lower Manyame Sub-catchment (LMS) is presented in this study. LMS is a vulnerable sub-catchment just above the confluence of the Manyame and Zambezi rivers. LMS is used for ecosystem sustenance, as well as irrigation, industrial, recreation and domestic purposes, so water quality monitoring has strategic importance that goes beyond ecosystem preservation. To control water quality in the country and, specifically, in LMS, the Environmental Management Agency (EMA) has and continues to use traditional field-based methods; the use of remote-sensing technology is in its infancy in most government and parastatal institutions. Therefore, the applicability of using Sentinel-2 data to estimate water quality concentrations, and integrate in-situ observations with remote-sensing data to describe water quality status were investigated this study. The empirical model results were evaluated against in-situ data collected during Sentinel-2 satellite overpasses.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Study area
LMS is at the mouth of the Manyame River, at its confluence with the Zambezi River. It covers approximately 6,308 km2, and is between 29.90 and 31.20o E, and 17.00 and 16.15o S. It has both semi-arid and savannah ecosystem characteristics, with the Zambezi escarpment almost separating them. Upstream (north) of the escarpment is the near-savannah ecosystem, while the area downstream is characterised mainly by semi-arid conditions. As a result, different land uses are found in the LMS (Figure 1) where they drain into the river. The Manyame River is the main river in the LMS but the Dande River is also present. LMS has an annual mean temperature of 25 °C and 650 mm rainfall, coupled with a good soil profile, giving it high agricultural potential (Chimweta et al. 2018).
In Figure 1, the types of land are described using these abbreviations: AP = A1 Prime; HVPC = Highveld Prime Communal; MIM = Mutorashanga Informal Mining; NP = National Park; NZVC = Northern Zambezi Valley Communal and U = Urban. Less intense use is made of fertilisers on HVPC, NP and NZVC, except for illegal riverbank cultivation and land degradation means. AP, MIM and U offer intense pollution risk to LMS as they are associated with high fertiliser use (AP), metal and sediment pollution (MIM) and municipal pollution from urban centres (U).
Field data
Field data came from samples collected at 12 sites along the rivers Manyame, Dande, Musitwi and Mukwadzi (Figure 2). Standard sampling and preservations approaches were used (Kulshreshtha & Shanmugam 2018; Meyer et al. 2019), and the parameters – TSS, COD, TN and TP – were determined in the laboratory at the University of Zimbabwe, Department of Civil Engineering Water.
Satellite images
The full resolution Sentinel-2 images acquired from the Earth explorer satellite image data repository for the periods October to December 2018 and January to April 2019 (Table 1), were used to define LMS river water quality. Sentinel-2 operates in the visible and near-infrared spectral range (443 to 2,190 nm), with a wavelength configuration sensitive to the most important optically active water constituents. In the subsequent literature review, existing remote sensing algorithms were evaluated and that yielding the highest value of R2 selected for use. Only cloud-free images that coincided with field-based data collection dates were used (Bonansea et al. 2019).
Field sampling dates in line with Sentinel-2 revisit calendar
2018 | 18-Oct | 05-Dec | 18-Dec |
2019 | 27-Jan | 13-Feb | 18-April |
2018 | 18-Oct | 05-Dec | 18-Dec |
2019 | 27-Jan | 13-Feb | 18-April |
Following other studies (Ortiz-Casas & Peña-Martinez 1989; Banko 1998; Gao et al. 2015; Feng et al. 2019), image pre-processing routines were carried out using the Quantum Geographical Information System (QGIS). The QGIS semi-automatic plugin was used to convert the radiance Sentinel-2 satellite imagery data to Earth's surface reflectance – i.e., correcting irradiance to all bands – which accounts for the difference between the actual and nominal solar irradiance wavelengths in each channel, and the top of atmosphere reflectance. The pre-processed images were analysed using existing empirical algorithms (Table 2) to estimate the concentrations of TSS, COD, TN and TP.
The modified empirical algorithms used
Adjusted algorithms . | Source . | R-squared . |
---|---|---|
TSS = 4.83−10.09*B3−0.37*B4−3.32*(B2/B3) | Song et al. (2014) | 0.27 |
COD = 218.75−4271.43*B2+3214.16*B3−561.44*B4 | Wang et al. (2004) | 0.21 |
TN = exp (1.10*(B4/B2)−0.30*(B2/B4)−3.16*B4−0.40) | Torbick et al. (2013) | 0.47 |
TP = exp (2.53+1.94*B4−0.97*(B4/B2)−1.42*(B2/B4) | Torbick et al. (2013) | 0.55 |
Adjusted algorithms . | Source . | R-squared . |
---|---|---|
TSS = 4.83−10.09*B3−0.37*B4−3.32*(B2/B3) | Song et al. (2014) | 0.27 |
COD = 218.75−4271.43*B2+3214.16*B3−561.44*B4 | Wang et al. (2004) | 0.21 |
TN = exp (1.10*(B4/B2)−0.30*(B2/B4)−3.16*B4−0.40) | Torbick et al. (2013) | 0.47 |
TP = exp (2.53+1.94*B4−0.97*(B4/B2)−1.42*(B2/B4) | Torbick et al. (2013) | 0.55 |
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
Analysis and validation
TSS
Findings from both the field and remote sensing showed that TSS concentrations were very low (Figure 3), the range observed was from 0.59 to 1.42 mg/L. TSS varied differently across the catchment, with relatively high concentrations observed in zones adjacent to areas that were recently deforested, semi-arid and/or close to mining activities. TSS concentrations were also higher in the Dande than the Manyame River, possibly as a result of river catchment characteristics such as sparser vegetation and mining activities (Zwane et al. 2006); so that areas drained by the Dande River yield high sediment loads since they are in the semi-arid region.
COD
Figure 4 shows some detailed COD results in the study area. The concentration range observed was from 37 to 142 mg/L. The high COD concentrations in the Dande River should be considered with caution as the river is dry most of the time, so there may be inconsistencies in COD determination using remote sensing. However, it can also be argued that Dande River water had high COD concentrations because only a few perennial streams feed it. Pollutants in the Dande are relatively concentrated, unlike the Manyame River, which is fed by streams such as the Musitwi and Mukwadzi upstream of the Dande River confluence.
TN
Figure 5 shows TN concentrations in part of LMS where concentrations ranged from 0.42 to 1.06 mg/L. TN concentrations are relatively lower in the Manyame River than in the Dande River. As for COD, this can be attributed to the Dande's low discharge and lack of effective contributing streams. The TN concentrations observed in the LMS water could arise from anthropogenic activities including fertiliser use, animal husbandry and industrial effluents.
TP
TP concentrations ranged from 1.00 to 3.45 mg/L (Figure 6), suggesting that river water in LMS is eutrophic. This could result from the extensive agricultural activities there, with some irrigated zones, and also, possibly, sediment transport with nutrient particulates attached (Song et al. 2012; Ak 2017; Cui et al. 2018). Agricultural sources of TP contribute immediately to eutrophication as the nutrients, which are dissolved, are readily available to aquatic vegetative organisms(Ebrahimi et al. 2022). On the other hand, TP from weathering and other particulate matter, as found in sediment transport, are affected by the underlying environmental conditions as they first need to decompose before the nutrient is readily available for use – i.e., in soluble form (Lee & Oh 2018).
Relationships between remote-sensing and field-based water quality parameters
The water quality parameter values predicted from remote sensing (Sentinel-2) correlated well with the field-based results. R2 ranged from 0.63 for TP to 0.78 for TN (Figure 7). The correlations indicated that the remote-sensing results tended to underestimate the highest water quality parameter concentrations while generalising the lowest ones. However, this could result in part from the field data's high variability, which may be influenced by the distances and different human activities between the sampling points. This was explained well by the high SDs of field-based parameter results (Table 3). Giardino et al. (2012) also found that field-based analyses may be inaccurate. Therefore, this study confirms that the high multi-spectral resolution Sentinel-2 information can be used to predict water quality parameters in LMS.
Site-based water quality variable concentrations from field-sampling and Sentinel-2 images
Station ID . | In-situ . | Sentinel-2 . | Parameter . |
---|---|---|---|
6 | 0.27 ± 0.02 | 0.37 ± 0.17 | TSS |
7 | 0.27 ± 0.02 | 0.16 ± 0.17 | |
8 | 0.31 ± 0.02 | 0.50 ± 0.17 | |
6 | 12.00 ± 26.18 | 24.73 ± 26.44 | COD |
7 | 13.35 ± 26.18 | 30.36 ± 26.44 | |
8 | 58.00 ± 26.18 | 73.07 ± 26.44 | |
6 | 5.40 ± 2.45 | 3.45 ± 0.14 | TN |
7 | 1.23 ± 2.45 | 3.41 ± 0.14 | |
8 | 1.10 ± 2.45 | 3.19 ± 0.14 | |
6 | 0.05 ± 1.99 | 2.17 ± 0.04 | TP |
7 | 4.02 ± 1.99 | 2.10 ± 0.04 | |
8 | 1.92 ± 1.99 | 2.11 ± 0.04 |
Station ID . | In-situ . | Sentinel-2 . | Parameter . |
---|---|---|---|
6 | 0.27 ± 0.02 | 0.37 ± 0.17 | TSS |
7 | 0.27 ± 0.02 | 0.16 ± 0.17 | |
8 | 0.31 ± 0.02 | 0.50 ± 0.17 | |
6 | 12.00 ± 26.18 | 24.73 ± 26.44 | COD |
7 | 13.35 ± 26.18 | 30.36 ± 26.44 | |
8 | 58.00 ± 26.18 | 73.07 ± 26.44 | |
6 | 5.40 ± 2.45 | 3.45 ± 0.14 | TN |
7 | 1.23 ± 2.45 | 3.41 ± 0.14 | |
8 | 1.10 ± 2.45 | 3.19 ± 0.14 | |
6 | 0.05 ± 1.99 | 2.17 ± 0.04 | TP |
7 | 4.02 ± 1.99 | 2.10 ± 0.04 | |
8 | 1.92 ± 1.99 | 2.11 ± 0.04 |
Comparison between the measured and remote-sensing derived water quality concentrations, where (a) = TSS, (b) = COD, (c) = TN, and (d) = TP.
Comparison between the measured and remote-sensing derived water quality concentrations, where (a) = TSS, (b) = COD, (c) = TN, and (d) = TP.
Validation
Three of the nine sites were purposively selected to validate the results. Sites 6 (Manyame River) and 8 (Dande River) were selected to represent water quality from remote sensing upstream of the escarpment. Site 7 (Manyame River) was selected as being close to a confluence of the numerous minor tributaries feeding the Manyame River. Site 7 is also downstream of the escarpment and there was a need to assess whether remote sensing approaches can quantify water quality pollution as effected by both the escarpment and the contributions of the tributaries.
The results of applying the empirical algorithms to the satellite images, corrected previously for atmospheric effects, were compared to the related field-based results. Table 3 shows the field-based TSS, COD, TN and TP values vs those predicted by Sentinel-2, and their respective SDs, for stations 6, 7 and 8 on LMS surface water (Figure 2). The largest deviations were observed for the field-based sampling values, probably due to large distances between sampling points, which resulted in different pollution levels as impacted by local human activities, among other factors.
Remote sensing and surface water monitoring for LMS
Water quality in rivers generally varies significantly over time at individual sites or along reaches, as induced by but not limited to streamflow, pollution source availability and/or hydrologic process in the catchment (Bugnot et al. 2018; Liu et al. 2018). Spatio-temporal variation in surface water quality is relevant when site-specific management strategies are to be developed. Although several different satellite image sets can be used for surface water quality assessment, those from Sentinel-2 are gaining wide use as they have high spatio-temporal resolution compared to others – e.g., Landsat. Sentinel-2's five-day temporal resolution is important in surface water quality monitoring, especially for rivers passing through areas with different anthropogenic activities and transboundary rivers like the Manyame River. Theoretically, the Manyame River is heavily polluted from Harare (upstream) to Mushumbi Pools (downstream). In this study, however, the spatio-temporal variation analysis showed that its tributaries were more heavily polluted than the Manyame itself. This could arise partly because most of the Manyame's tributaries are dry most of the year. As a result, the reflectance captured in the satellite images may be that of the dry river bed rather than water, resulting in compromised water quality information.
Most remote-sensing approaches can be used with different satellite images. While Landsat TM dominated this domain previously because of its low cost, and temporal and spatial resolutions, Sentinel-2 can do much better. In fact, remote-sensing spatio-temporal analysis can yield acceptable results for perennial rivers of varied width and depth (Beck 1987; Shafique et al. 2002; Gholizadeh et al. 2016a; Sharma et al. 2018). In this study, high spatial resolution satellite images were used to capture spatial variation in pollution parameters along the main rivers of LMS.
CONCLUSIONS
This study confirmed the effectiveness of an integrated approach based on remote sensing and in situ measurements to evaluate water quality in LMS. The integrated approach allows natural resource custodians to take advantage of the use of multi-temporal, remote-sensing data – a cost-effective technology that has been shown to be an important source of information to support the definition of water quality status in LMS.
It has been shown that tributaries can hold the balance of power, acting as vectors from different pollution sources, whether point-based or diffuse, or organic or inorganic.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
Gratitude goes to the Environmental Management Agency and DUPC (through the S-MultiStor Project) for the assistance rendered in this study, especially the funding.
FUNDING
Support for this research (data collection) was received from Environmental Management Agency and DUPC (S-MultiStor Project).
CONFLICT OF INTEREST STATEMENT
The authors declare there is no conflict.
DATA AVAILABILITY STATEMENT
Data cannot be made publicly available; readers should contact the corresponding author for details.