Water quality, pollution level, and trophic conditions were assessed in Aritar Lake located in the Himalayas in East Sikkim, India, in relation to geo-environmental influences and anthropogenic activity in its catchment. A comprehensive method involving indexing and multivariate analyses was used. Geostatistical tools were employed to interpolate seasonal and spatial deviations in water quality, and nutrient and organic load distribution. Lake water nutrient index (NI) values were between 4.61 and 7.31, and 2.65 and 4.69 during pre- and post-monsoon seasons, respectively, indicating significant nutrient enrichment and eutrophic conditions. For both seasons, the estimated organic pollution index (OPI) showed class II contamination (contamination starting), with post-monsoon values being higher. The study shows clear signs of eutrophication and early organic pollution. Effective management plans and sustainable tourism practices may benefit the lake, by reducing contamination and protecting the integrity of its ecosystem.

  • Assessment of nutrient dynamics, organic pollution, and trophic state of the lake on a spatio-temporal scale.

  • Appraisal of water quality and lake health using the WQI, OPI, and geostatistical methods.

  • Multivariate analysis to delineate influencing factors and pollution sources.

India has many natural lakes. Their presence in the Himalayas is critical because they are the primary source of freshwater in remote locations. The Himalayas in India extend almost 2,400 km east to west and incorporate hundreds of glacial and non-glacial lakes, which are mostly perennial, receiving freshwater from monsoon rain and snowmelt. The lakes and wetlands of the Himalayas are geographically and environmentally significant and possess enormous value, as they are hotspots for trekking enthusiasts and travelers, and are enriched with biodiversity and aquatic life forms (Bhat et al. 2011). Mountain lakes, an essential water source, are highly valued for livelihoods, and have enormous ecological and economic importance (Ho & Goethals 2019). Natural lakes in mountain regions are susceptible to anthropogenic use (Dynowski et al. 2019). As a result, they are affected by environmental shifts, which threaten lake organisms and ecosystem services (Sterner et al. 2020). Recreational use and livestock farming also put a strain on mountain lakes (Senetra et al. 2020).

As mountain lakes are used as local water sources for subsistence, they are vulnerable to tourists' irresponsible behavior, which affects ecosystems and causes environmental degradation (Senetra et al. 2020). With increasing tourist inflow and local population in the lake catchment, it is important to keep track of the quality of the water, its productivity, and the health of the lake's ecosystem. Nutrient enrichment and organic pollution can degrade the ecological integrity of the lentic ecosystem and cause human health concerns. Nutrient concentrations in the lake are likely to increase due to the influx of runoff, weathering, and erosion loads. The accumulation of organic matter may alter nutrient levels and, subsequently, the system's trophic relations (Liu et al. 2011). Enrichment of nutrients in aquatic systems stimulates algal growth with consequential impacts on trophic relations, habitat quality, community structure, pH, dissolved O2 concentrations, and aesthetic qualities (Miltner & Rankin 1998), so it is vital to identify the sources and factors contributing nutrients to the lake's water. Sustainable management strategies and appropriate plans are also required to ensure human livelihoods and conserve mountain lakes for their aesthetic and ecological values.

Aritar Lake is one of the oldest in Sikkim and has high social and eco-geological importance. Local communities depend on it, for economic revenue that it generates through tourism and lake-centric activities, as well as the water resource. Historic data on nutrient concentrations and organic pollution in Sikkim Himalayan lakes and streams are sparse. However, little importance has been given to exploring the bio-geophysical and chemical processes that influence water quality and productivity of the lake ecosystem. Previously, Nayek et al. (2017, 2018) studied the seasonal variations in the physicochemical properties of Aritar Lake water and investigated its trophic state. However, insufficient information is available regarding potential sources of nutrient loading, organic pollution, and other diverse factors on lake water systems to develop effective strategies for sustainable use and conservation of the resources. In this study, spatial and seasonal water quality variations with respect to organic pollutant load and nutrient enrichment were investigated. Indexing methods such as water quality index (WQI), organic pollution index (OPI), and nutrient index (NI) were used to assess water quality and the water's trophic classification. Multivariate analysis and geostatistical tools were used to delineate the influence of many factors and interpolate water pollution levels and trophic conditions on spatial and temporal scales.

1.1. Study area

Aritar Lake, locally known as Lampokhari Lake, is a natural alpine lake in East Sikkim, India (Figure 1). It is in the Middle Himalayas at an elevation of 1,400 m. Recently, the lake embankment was rebuilt in concrete, and a walkway was constructed around it. The lake watershed is predominantly Darjeeling gneiss, with a rich, mixed forest cover dominated by pine trees. The lake has boating facilities and other recreational activities, which attract tourists as well as local visitors.
Figure 1

Study area.

Aritar Lake is perennial, and fed by an artificial supply, surface runoff from the catchment, and atmospheric precipitation during the rainy season (Nayek et al. 2017). It is a prime location for bird-watching and is increasingly popular with tourists. The lake's catchment has been transformed by anthropogenic pressure recently. The forest and lake watershed have been encroached on to facilitate tourist hotels and rest houses, which has impacted the lake's water quality and eco-hydrological conditions significantly.

Sample collection and investigation

Field sample collection and analysis were performed between 2019 and 2021, during pre- and post-monsoon seasons. Six sampling locations were chosen along the lake's margins. Sterilized 1-L PVC bottles were used for collection, and samples were collected 0.3 m below the water surface. pH, electrical conductivity (EC), total dissolved solids (TDS), and dissolved oxygen (DO) were measured on-field by using a multi-parameter hand analyzer (Eutech instruments). The bottles were transported to the laboratory at 4 °C in an ice container. APHA standard methods (APHA 2005) were followed for collection, preservation, and analysis. To maintain accuracy, all parameters were determined three times, and the mean values were used for data analysis, representation, and interpretation. Multivariate statistical analyses such as Pearson's correlation, cluster analysis (CA), and principal component analysis (PCA) on the analytical results were performed using statistical software (SPSS, version 20.0) to assess possible sources of contamination, relative behavior, and parameter interdependency. After laboratory examination and consecutive statistical analysis, the data were analyzed using GIS. The geostatistical tool of ARC GIS was used to interpolate water quality data. The inverse distance weighted (IDW) method was used with the spatial analyst extension of ArcGIS 10.8. The experimental results from the analysis were collated as an Excel file and converted into a shapefile in ArcGIS. Ground-checking proved the interpolation's validity.

Water quality classification by indexing

Nutrient index

The application of NI helps classify the lake water with respect to its nutrients. Comparison and indexing of the components with their respective standards to provide a single-value trophic conditions can be analyzed effectively. Nutrient enrichment is widely regarded as a serious environmental concern, resulting in water quality degradation in any lentic ecosystem. The calculation and classification of NI were introduced by the Chinese National Environmental Monitoring Center (Lin 1996; Xiao et al. 2007).

NI was formulated using Equation (1):
(1)
where CCOD, CTN, CTP, and CChl−a are the concentrations of chemical oxygen demand (COD), total nitrogen (TN), total phosphorus (TP) (mg/L), and chlorophyll-a (Chl-a) (μg/L) in lake water, respectively. SCOD, STN, STP, and SChl−a are the recommended maximum concentrations for COD (3 mg/L), TN (45 mg-NO3/L), TP (0.03 mg/l), and Chl-a (12 μg/L) (IS:2296 1982).

Organic pollution index

The OPI is comprehensive and measures the composite effects of multiple parameters such as COD, DIN (dissolved inorganic nitrogen), DIP (dissolved phosphate), and DO on surface water quality. The OPI was calculated using Equation (2) (Liu et al. 2011):
(2)
where CODs, DINs, DIPs, and DOs are the recommended maximum concentrations (IS:2296 1982). OPI is categorized as <1 = uncontaminated (Class I), 1–2 = contamination beginning (Class II), 2–3 = lightly polluted (Class III), 3–4 = moderately polluted (Class IV), and >4 = heavily polluted (Class V).

Water quality index

Surface water quality assessment for human use and consumption is frequently performed using the weightage-based arithmetic WQI. The composite influences of different surface water physicochemical parameters are reflected by the single numerical WQI value, which also evaluates the influence of geogenic and anthropogenic activity as they affect drinking water quality (Gupta et al. 2016; Singh et al. 2018; Kumar et al. 2019). In this study, 11 physicochemical parameters including pH, EC, TDS, total hardness (TH), turbidity, DO, COD, chloride (Cl), nitrate (NO3), phosphate (PO43−), Chl-a, and their recommended/prescribed maxima by WHO (2006) and BIS (2012) were used for pre- and post-monsoon WQI calculation. For this, the weightage (Wa) for each parameter is set between 1 and 5, based on their relative influence on water quality (Table 1). Initially, the relative weight (Wr) is estimated using Equation (3).
(3)
where Wr and Wa are the relative and assigned weightage of the parameters, and n denotes the number of parameters.
Table 1

Water parameter weightage assignment for the WQI, using WHO (2006) and BIS (2012) standards for human consumption

ParameterWHO recommendations (2006)BIS standards (2012)
Weight (Wi)Relative weight (Wr)
DesirablePermissible
pH 6.5–8.5 6.5–8.5 NX 0.114 
EC (μS/cm) 2,000 2,000 NX 0.086 
TDS 1,000 500 2,000 0.114 
TH – 200 600 0.086 
Turbidity – 0.057 
DO ≥5 NX 0.057 
Cl 250 250 1,000 0.114 
COD 10a – – 0.086 
NO3 45 45 NX 0.143 
PO43− 0.3 NX 0.086 
Chl-a 10b – NX 0.057 
    Wa = 35 Wr = 1.000 
ParameterWHO recommendations (2006)BIS standards (2012)
Weight (Wi)Relative weight (Wr)
DesirablePermissible
pH 6.5–8.5 6.5–8.5 NX 0.114 
EC (μS/cm) 2,000 2,000 NX 0.086 
TDS 1,000 500 2,000 0.114 
TH – 200 600 0.086 
Turbidity – 0.057 
DO ≥5 NX 0.057 
Cl 250 250 1,000 0.114 
COD 10a – – 0.086 
NO3 45 45 NX 0.143 
PO43− 0.3 NX 0.086 
Chl-a 10b – NX 0.057 
    Wa = 35 Wr = 1.000 

NX, no relaxation.

Secondly, the quality rating scale (Qi) of each parameter is calculated using Equation (4):
(4)
where Qi is the quality rating; Ci is the concentration of each chemical parameter; Vi is the ideal value of each parameter (taken as 0 for all except pH (7) and DO (14.6)); and Si is the standard recommended/permissible maximum prescribed by WHO (2006) and BIS (2012) for each parameter.
Finally, the WQI is estimated using the parameters' sub-indices (SI) values as per Equations (5) and (6):
(5)
(6)
The computed WQI was categorized following the suggested categorization of water quality (Gupta et al. 2016; Singh et al. 2018; Kumar et al. 2019) as: excellent (WQI < 25), good (WQI: 25–50), moderate (WQI: 51–75), poor (WQI: 76–100), and very poor (WQI > 100).

General characterization of Aritar Lake

The physio-chemical analytical results are presented in Table 2. The water temperature showed distinct seasonal fluctuations, with values between 17 and 19 °C during the pre-monsoon season, and between 7 and 10 °C during the post-monsoon season. The pH value of lake water ranged 6.5–6.7 (pre-monsoon) and 6.3–6.6 (post-monsoon) during the observation periods, with the majority of samples being within the recommended pH tolerance limits (6.5–8.5) (IS:2296 1982).

Table 2

Statistical summary of Aritar Lake's physicochemical parameters during pre- and post-monsoon seasons

ParameterPre-monsoon
Post-monsoon
MinMaxMeanSDMinMaxMeanSD
Temp. (°C) 15 18 16.50 1.26 10 8.17 1.34 
pH 6.5 6.7 6.62 0.09 6.3 6.6 6.45 0.10 
EC (μS/cm at 25 °C) 71.25 84.4 77.83 4.67 67.2 151.5 109.35 27.14 
TDS (mg/L) 36.7 47.2 41.95 3.75 32.5 66.15 49.33 11.46 
Turbidity (NTU) 19.2 23.8 21.65 1.49 15.6 38.75 27.18 7.79 
TH (mg/L) 20 25.8 22.88 2.04 16.8 21.6 19.24 1.65 
DO (mg/L) 2.6 3.8 3.20 0.46 3.6 5.8 4.53 0.76 
COD (mg/L) 14.5 17.6 15.70 1.02 18.2 25.6 21.02 2.59 
Cl- (mg/L) 4.9 6.6 5.75 0.52 4.3 5.6 4.95 0.50 
TN (mg/L) 0.92 1.34 1.15 0.16 1.2 1.8 1.52 0.20 
TP (mg/L) 0.06 0.09 0.08 0.01 0.1 0.14 0.12 0.01 
Chl-a (μg/L) 52 83 67.50 10.74 27 49 38.00 7.92 
ParameterPre-monsoon
Post-monsoon
MinMaxMeanSDMinMaxMeanSD
Temp. (°C) 15 18 16.50 1.26 10 8.17 1.34 
pH 6.5 6.7 6.62 0.09 6.3 6.6 6.45 0.10 
EC (μS/cm at 25 °C) 71.25 84.4 77.83 4.67 67.2 151.5 109.35 27.14 
TDS (mg/L) 36.7 47.2 41.95 3.75 32.5 66.15 49.33 11.46 
Turbidity (NTU) 19.2 23.8 21.65 1.49 15.6 38.75 27.18 7.79 
TH (mg/L) 20 25.8 22.88 2.04 16.8 21.6 19.24 1.65 
DO (mg/L) 2.6 3.8 3.20 0.46 3.6 5.8 4.53 0.76 
COD (mg/L) 14.5 17.6 15.70 1.02 18.2 25.6 21.02 2.59 
Cl- (mg/L) 4.9 6.6 5.75 0.52 4.3 5.6 4.95 0.50 
TN (mg/L) 0.92 1.34 1.15 0.16 1.2 1.8 1.52 0.20 
TP (mg/L) 0.06 0.09 0.08 0.01 0.1 0.14 0.12 0.01 
Chl-a (μg/L) 52 83 67.50 10.74 27 49 38.00 7.92 

TDS was between 36.7 and 47.2 mg/L, and 32.5 and 66.15 mg/L during pre- and post-monsoon seasons, respectively; all within the permissible limits (500–1,500 mg/L) (IS:2296 1982). EC, an indirect form of measure of TDS, relating only to ionic species, was invariably higher – 67.2 to 151.5 μS/cm – post-monsoon, while comparatively low – 71.25 to 84.4 μS/cm – pre-monsoon. Turbidity was between 19.2 and 23.8, and 15.6 and 38.75 NTU during pre- and post-monsoon seasons.

Elevated post-monsoon values for these parameters can be linked to higher runoff from the catchment and higher turbulence during heavy rains. As per the Indian standard (IS:2296 1982), DO exceeding 4 mg/L indicates a healthy water body, but pre-monsoon DO levels were between 2.6 and 3.8 mg/L, while post-monsoon DO ranged between 3.6 and 5.8 mg/L. COD, an indirect proxy for potential pollutants, was between 14.5 and 17.6, and 18.2 and 25.6 mg/L in pre- and post-monsoon analyses, respectively. The additional anthropogenic influx through catchment runoff during the peak tourism seasons and post-monsoon months may result in higher post-monsoon concentrations.

The lake water's chlorine content has higher values in the pre-monsoon period (4.9–6.6 mg/L) than post-monsoon (4.3–5.6 mg/L). Soluble iron concentrations were between 0.15 and 1.2 mg/L during the pre-monsoon season, and 0.1 and 1.3 mg/L during the post-monsoon season, with little variation. Sulfate concentrations were higher (0.1–0.14 mg/L) during the pre-monsoon season and lower (0.08–0.12 mg/L) during the post-monsoon season, perhaps in the latter case due to dilution by rainfall.

Measurement of Chl-a, with TP and TN, provides a comprehensive picture of a water body's trophic condition, following the EPA National Eutrophication standards (Table 3). Low nutrient levels and Chl-a content result in low productivity in lake water systems – i.e., oligotrophic conditions. A mesotrophic condition may arise due to moderate nutrient content and Chl-a, while higher nutrient and Chl-a (>12 μg/L) concentrations indicate high productivity levels and are eutrophic. These parameters can also affect the level of phytoplankton in a lentic ecosystem, phytoplankton play an important role in nutrient-rich freshwater providing oxygen for aerobic organisms and degrading organic compounds (Phu 2014), an important regulating factor for maintaining lake ecosystem equilibrium. When a lake's productivity increases significantly, leading to higher phytoplankton biomass, the water becomes eutrophic, impacting the health of the lentic ecosystem and becoming a long-term matter of concern as constant unregulated eutrophic conditions can lead to the lentic system's ecological death. In this study, TP ranged between 60 and 90 μg/L (pre-monsoon), and 100 and 140 μg/L (post-monsoon), while TN was between 920 and 1,340 (pre-monsoon), and 1,200 and 1,800 μg/L (post-monsoon). Chl-a, which determines lake productivity directly, was between 52 and 83, and 27 and 49 mg/L during pre- and post-monsoon, respectively. The observations show that nutrient levels and algal abundance in the lake water are noticeably higher than the recommended eutrophication levels in both seasons – i.e., the water body is highly eutrophic.

Table 3

Classification of lake water by EPA National Eutrophication Survey (1974)

EPA National Eutrophication Standards (1974)Chlorophyll-a (μg/L)Total phosphorus (μg/L)Total nitrogen (μg/L)Trophic condition
 <7 <10 <400 Oligotrophic 
 7–12 10–20 400–600 Mesotrophic 
 >12 >20 >600 Eutrophic 
Present study
SeasonChlorophyll-a (μg/L)Total phosphorus (μg/L)Total nitrogen (μg/L)Lake's trophic state
Pre-monsoon 67.5 75 1,130 Eutrophic 
Post-monsoon 38 120 1,500 Eutrophic 
EPA National Eutrophication Standards (1974)Chlorophyll-a (μg/L)Total phosphorus (μg/L)Total nitrogen (μg/L)Trophic condition
 <7 <10 <400 Oligotrophic 
 7–12 10–20 400–600 Mesotrophic 
 >12 >20 >600 Eutrophic 
Present study
SeasonChlorophyll-a (μg/L)Total phosphorus (μg/L)Total nitrogen (μg/L)Lake's trophic state
Pre-monsoon 67.5 75 1,130 Eutrophic 
Post-monsoon 38 120 1,500 Eutrophic 

Evaluation of nutrient enrichment, organic pollution, and classifying Aritar Lake water using NI, OPI, and WQI

NI was computed to elaborate the lake water's nutrient enrichment status. Wastewater discharges from surrounding settlements make a major contribution to the nutrient load, and, with runoff from settlements and agricultural zones, nutrient enrichment poses a severe threat. Because algae respond invariably to nutrient loading, excess algal biomass can affect habitat quality by altering DO concentrations, turbidity, biotic community structure, and the ecosystem's aesthetic value (Royer et al. 2008). Although nutrient loading and phytoplankton growth are essential for lentic ecosystems, high, above-optimal algal growth to algal blooms and eutrophication, ultimately degrading water quality and hindering aquatic life. If NI > 4, eutrophic conditions are indicated. The lake's NI was between 4.61 and 7.31, and 2.75–4.69 during pre- and post-monsoon seasons, respectively (Figure 2), clearly suggesting significant nutrient enrichment and subsequent hyper-eutrophic conditions. This arises from prevailing environmental conditions including organic matter input from forest-dominated areas, wastewater discharged from human settlements, and the lake's shallow profile, which favors phytoplankton growth.
Figure 2

Spatial distribution of the NI in Aritar Lake.

Figure 2

Spatial distribution of the NI in Aritar Lake.

Close modal
In this study, the OPI ranged from 0.93 to 1.35 (pre-monsoon) with an average of 1.15, and 1.34–2.06 – mean 1.65 (post-monsoon). Clearly the organic load has already begun to pollute the lake's water, with sampling station S4 classified as ‘lightly polluted’ during the post-monsoon season (Figure 3). A higher average post-monsoon might be linked to higher, peak tourist season discharges of wastewater from the lake's surroundings.
Figure 3

Spatial distribution of the OPI in Aritar Lake.

Figure 3

Spatial distribution of the OPI in Aritar Lake.

Close modal
Figure 4

Spatial distribution of the WQI in Aritar Lake.

Figure 4

Spatial distribution of the WQI in Aritar Lake.

Close modal

The relationship between Chl-a and nutrients is often influenced by factors such as flooding, grazing, and shading, making it difficult to distinguish between the effects of human disturbances and natural variations (Dodds & Welch 2000). Statistical study has shown significant correlations (r = 0.797) between NI and OPI during the pre-monsoon season, which could be due to similar spatial distribution of nutrient trends and organic pollutants coming from a common origin, i.e., anthropogenic sources. On the other hand, weak NI and OPI post-monsoon correlations (r = 0.262) can be explained due to nutrient and organic pollutant concentrations that are attributed to a variety of sources, including anthropogenic, geogenic, and runoff water, as well as being influenced by temporal factors.

Based on cross-tabulation analysis, the result of the Pearson χ2 test between OPI and NI is insignificant (0.224), indicating that the lake's nutrients and organic pollutants subjected to and influenced by diverse factors.

The WQI reflects a comprehensive view of significant physicochemical water quality parameters, and 11 parameters (Table 2) were considered in this study. The spatial distribution of Aritar Lake's WQI is explicated in Figure 4 for the pre- and post-monsoon seasons. Aritar Lake's WQIs ranged from 79 to 99.12 during the pre-monsoon season, indicating that the water is in the ‘poor’ category for drinking. Post-monsoon, the WQI range was between 75.25 and 109.55, the ‘moderate to very poor’ range. In general, the lake water does not seem to be of ‘good quality’ in either season and, therefore, cannot be considered for drinking purposes without proper treatment.

The study revealed a clear eutrophic condition and a pollution load that exceeded the lake's natural biocapacity. Nutrient concentration management in aquatic systems is highly important since nutrient loads influence ecological processes other than algal growth, including heterotrophic respiration (Dodds 2006).

Correlation of the variables analyzed

Correlation analysis is used to measure the strength of linear association between variables and calculate their relationship. In this study, Pearson's rank correlation method (two-tailed) was used. In the end, some water quality parameter correlations were significant at the 0.05 level (*) while some reflected significance at the 0.01 level (**).

During the pre-monsoon season (Table 4), temperature is statistically significant with TH (0.835*) and Cl (0.862*), and EC with TDS (0.971**) and turbidity (0.949**). TH is also statistically significant with DO (0.816*), COD (0.858*), TP (0.878*), and Cl (0.919**), while DO is statistically significant with Cl (0.867*), COD (0.894*), TP (0.886*), and TN (0.844*) respectively, and Cl with COD (0.891*) and TP (0.844*). COD is also statistically significant with TP (0.876*), as is TDS with turbidity (0.885*).

Table 4

Aritar Lake correlation investigation during pre- and post-monsoon seasons

TemppHECTDSTHTurbidityDOClCODTPTNChl-a
Pre-monsoon 
Temp −0.026 0.511 0.643 0.835* 0.523 0.659 0.862* 0.662 0.536 0.508 0.313 
pH  0.421 0.295 0.402 0.556 0.527 0.466 0.676 0.725 0.452 0.355 
EC   0.971** 0.38 0.949** 0.396 0.683 0.520 0.369 0.640 0.150 
TDS    0.447 0.885* 0.496 0.750 0.540 0.389 0.736 0.272 
TH     0.53 0.816* 0.919** 0.858* 0.878* 0.501 0.491 
Turbidity      0.414 0.742 0.604 0.521 0.531 0.130 
DO       0.867* 0.894* 0.886* 0.844* 0.786 
Cl        0.891* 0.844* 0.746 0.547 
COD         0.876* 0.667 0.461 
TP          0.647 0.706 
TN           0.792 
Chl-a            
Post-monsoon 
Temp 0.842* 0.694 0.990** 0.618 0.903* 0.552 0.966** 0.560 0.865* 0.141 0.36 
pH  0.753 0.799 0.531 0.77 0.644 0.713 0.535 0.674 0.192 0.198 
EC   0.661 0.827* 0.883* 0.665 0.638 0.838* 0.770 0.669 0.537 
TDS    0.648 0.881* 0.594 0.967** 0.603 0.898* 0.192 0.395 
TH     0.704 0.866* 0.551 0.962** 0.909* 0.793 0.363 
Turbidity      0.498 0.915* 0.693 0.838* 0.398 0.638 
DO       0.405 0.874* 0.802 0.686 0.114 
Cl        0.513 0.825* 0.129 0.528 
COD         0.858* 0.890* 0.516 
TP          0.542 0.408 
TN           0.537 
Chl-a            
TemppHECTDSTHTurbidityDOClCODTPTNChl-a
Pre-monsoon 
Temp −0.026 0.511 0.643 0.835* 0.523 0.659 0.862* 0.662 0.536 0.508 0.313 
pH  0.421 0.295 0.402 0.556 0.527 0.466 0.676 0.725 0.452 0.355 
EC   0.971** 0.38 0.949** 0.396 0.683 0.520 0.369 0.640 0.150 
TDS    0.447 0.885* 0.496 0.750 0.540 0.389 0.736 0.272 
TH     0.53 0.816* 0.919** 0.858* 0.878* 0.501 0.491 
Turbidity      0.414 0.742 0.604 0.521 0.531 0.130 
DO       0.867* 0.894* 0.886* 0.844* 0.786 
Cl        0.891* 0.844* 0.746 0.547 
COD         0.876* 0.667 0.461 
TP          0.647 0.706 
TN           0.792 
Chl-a            
Post-monsoon 
Temp 0.842* 0.694 0.990** 0.618 0.903* 0.552 0.966** 0.560 0.865* 0.141 0.36 
pH  0.753 0.799 0.531 0.77 0.644 0.713 0.535 0.674 0.192 0.198 
EC   0.661 0.827* 0.883* 0.665 0.638 0.838* 0.770 0.669 0.537 
TDS    0.648 0.881* 0.594 0.967** 0.603 0.898* 0.192 0.395 
TH     0.704 0.866* 0.551 0.962** 0.909* 0.793 0.363 
Turbidity      0.498 0.915* 0.693 0.838* 0.398 0.638 
DO       0.405 0.874* 0.802 0.686 0.114 
Cl        0.513 0.825* 0.129 0.528 
COD         0.858* 0.890* 0.516 
TP          0.542 0.408 
TN           0.537 
Chl-a            

*Correlation is significant at the 0.05 level (two-tailed).

**Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (two-tailed).

During the post-monsoon season (Table 4), temperature is statistically significant with pH (0.842*), turbidity (0.903*), TP (0.865*), TDS (0.990**), and Cl (0.966**). EC is statistically significant with TH (0.827*), turbidity (0.883*), and COD (0.838*), and TDS with turbidity (0.881*), TP (0.898*), and Cl (0.967**). TH is also statistically significant with DO (0.866*), TP (0.909*), and COD (0.962**), and turbidity with Cl (0.915*) and TP (0.838*), whereas COD is statistically significant with TP (0.858*) and TN (0.890*). Furthermore, DO is statistically significant with COD (0.874*), and Cl with TP (0.825*).

Cluster study

CA classifies sets of variables into groups so that those in the same group are more similar to each other than those in other groups. CA enabled identification of two distinct groups for the pre-monsoon season (Figure 5). Group 1 showed close association between COD and Cl (and TH), and Cl with TP and TN, which can be attributed to anthropogenic contributions and wastewater discharges from nearby settlements. In Group 2, the close alliance between EC and TDS is very obvious. On the other hand, the post-monsoon dendrogram showed a close relationship between EC, TDS, and TN, as the water's conductivity is primarily determined by dissolved ionic species.
Figure 5

Cluster study (dendrogram based on hierarchical clustering) of variables in Aritar Lake, during pre- and post-monsoon seasons.

Figure 5

Cluster study (dendrogram based on hierarchical clustering) of variables in Aritar Lake, during pre- and post-monsoon seasons.

Close modal

Principal components analysis

PCA is used to minimize the dimensionality of a dataset. In this study, it was carried out in relation to the pre-and post-monsoon parameter values. The Eigen value is considered more than 1.

During the pre-monsoon season, component 1 (PC 1) shows the highest variation, about 65%. Subsequently, Component 2's (PC 2) variation is approximately 15%, and Component 3's (PC 3) around 10% (Table 5). The variations for the remaining components are insignificant.

Table 5

PCA during pre- and post-monsoon seasons

VariablesComponent matrix
Pre-monsoon
Post-monsoon
PC 1PC 2PC 3PC 1PC 2PC 3
Temp. 0.750 0.114 −0.647 0.877 −0.472 −0.073 
pH 0.598 −0.133 0.741 0.789 −0.327 −0.267 
EC 0.719 0.671 0.149 0.90 0.148 0.091 
TDS 0.768 0.594 −0.027 0.888 −0.418 −0.064 
TH 0.854 −0.229 −0.306 0.886 0.378 −0.149 
Turbidity 0.761 0.579 0.190 0.926 −0.24 0.235 
DO 0.902 −0.38 −0.05 0.782 0.358 −0.469 
Cl 0.978 0.024 −0.186 0.837 −0.498 0.161 
COD 0.909 −0.162 0.041 0.884 0.464 −0.019 
TP 0.876 −0.391 0.136 0.958 −0.004 −0.121 
TN 0.835 −0.047 0.116 0.598 0.786 0.151 
Chl-a 0.623 −0.546 0.075 0.538 0.108 0.815 
Eigenvalue 7.785 1.845 1.197 8.289 1.948 1.115 
Variability (%) 64.874 15.373 9.975 69.073 16.231 9.292 
Cumulative % 64.874  80.247  90.222  69.073 85.304 94.596 
VariablesComponent matrix
Pre-monsoon
Post-monsoon
PC 1PC 2PC 3PC 1PC 2PC 3
Temp. 0.750 0.114 −0.647 0.877 −0.472 −0.073 
pH 0.598 −0.133 0.741 0.789 −0.327 −0.267 
EC 0.719 0.671 0.149 0.90 0.148 0.091 
TDS 0.768 0.594 −0.027 0.888 −0.418 −0.064 
TH 0.854 −0.229 −0.306 0.886 0.378 −0.149 
Turbidity 0.761 0.579 0.190 0.926 −0.24 0.235 
DO 0.902 −0.38 −0.05 0.782 0.358 −0.469 
Cl 0.978 0.024 −0.186 0.837 −0.498 0.161 
COD 0.909 −0.162 0.041 0.884 0.464 −0.019 
TP 0.876 −0.391 0.136 0.958 −0.004 −0.121 
TN 0.835 −0.047 0.116 0.598 0.786 0.151 
Chl-a 0.623 −0.546 0.075 0.538 0.108 0.815 
Eigenvalue 7.785 1.845 1.197 8.289 1.948 1.115 
Variability (%) 64.874 15.373 9.975 69.073 16.231 9.292 
Cumulative % 64.874  80.247  90.222  69.073 85.304 94.596 

Extraction method: PCA. Three components extracted.The values highlighted in bold represent higher loading in particular extracted components.

PC 1 deals with temperature, EC, TDS, TH, turbidity, DO, Cl, COD, TP, TN, and Chl-a, and can be attributed to the combined influence of anthropogenic contributions and temporal factors. PC 2 demonstrates high EC, TDS, and turbidity loadings, which can be linked to geogenic and lithogenic sources. PC 3, which consists of pH, describes ongoing geo-physical and chemical mechanisms that determine the hydro-chemical nature of lake water systems.

Post-monsoon, PC-1 again shows the highest variation, at about 69%. PC 2's variation is approximately 16%, and PC 3's around 9% (Table 5). Again, the variations for the remaining components are insignificant. In the post-monsoon season, PC 1 showed high temperature, pH, EC, TDS, TH, turbidity, DO, Cl, COD, TP, and TN loadings, which can be linked to anthropogenic contributions and geo-climatic factors. PC 2, demonstrated for TN, can be attributed to agricultural runoff and cattle sheds, and PC 3 – essentially Chl-a –can be associated to algal components arising from nutrient enrichment in the lake system.

Natural ecosystems maintain inert equilibrium through self-regulating energy flows, but are sensitive to external stimuli. Human activities to benefit socio-economic targets disrupt the natural equilibrium, degrading the ecosystem's long-term health. If ecosystem health is not controlled, this can lead to the system's death, having a domino effect on nature as well as the anticipated socio-economic goals.

Aritar Lake is an integral component of the local community, which depends on and benefits from lake-centric tourist activities. The large number of tourists means an elevated anthropogenic load into the lake, with direct impacts on its ecosystem. Apart from the anthropogenic contributions, rock weathering, soil erosion, and runoff from the catchment, as well as litter deposited in the lake are also accountable for changing the lake water's physicochemical characteristics. Local stakeholders have a significant role to play, therefore, they can take up cleaning and other conservative measures to reduce the lake's inorganic load. Revised environmental protection policies should also be implemented.

The study showed distinct seasonal variations in the parameters measured, but they were within the desired limits for surface water. The concentrations of TP, TN, and Chl-a showed the lake's highly eutrophic nature. The NI was determined and showed highly eutrophic lentic ecosystems in both seasons. The higher post-monsoon NI can be associated with greater anthropogenic release during peak tourist seasons.

The OPI was also calculated and showed a similar pattern with ‘contaminating starting’ apparent in both the pre- and post-monsoon seasons.

The lake is an integral part of the Himalayas’ fragile alpine ecosystem, as well as aiding the socio-economic life of a dependent local population. Hence, a sustainable approach is the only way to address environmental concerns quickly while acting strategically and effectively. For instance, in situ lake cleaning, including de-weeding, de-silting, bioremediation, bio-manipulation, nutrient reduction, etc., can be executed to address the issues. Catchment-related actions including silt traps, afforestation around the lake, lake fencing, shoreline development, low-cost sanitation, and other initiatives may also prove helpful in conserving this natural aquatic system.

The authors wish to thank Amity University Kolkata and Asansol Engineering College, West Bengal for providing infrastructure and facilities to carry out this research work. The authors sincerely acknowledge DST, GOI, for partial financial support (Project No. DST/TMD/EWO/WTI/2K19/EWFH/2019/217).

All relevant data are included in the paper or its Supplementary Information.

The authors declare there is no conflict.

APHA
.
2005
Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater
, 21st edn.
American Public Health Association/ American Water Works Association/Water Environment Federation
,
Washington, DC
.
Bhat
F. A.
,
Yousuf
A. R.
,
Aftab
A.
,
Arshid
J.
,
Mahdi
M. D.
&
Balkhi
M. H.
2011
Ecology and biodiversity in Pangong Tso (Lake) and its inlet stream in Ladakh, India
.
International Journal of Biodiversity and Conservation
3
(
10
),
501
511
.
BIS
.
2012
Indian Standard for Drinking Water – Specification 2012
, 2nd Revision.
Bureau of Indian Standards
,
New Delhi
,
India
.
Carlson
R. E.
&
Simpson
J.
1996
A Coordinator's Guide to Volunteer Lake Monitoring Methods
.
North American Lake Management Society
,
Madison, USA
.
Dodds
W. K.
2006
Eutrophication and trophic state in rivers and streams
.
Limnology and Oceanography
51
,
671
680
.
Dodds
W. K.
&
Welch
E. B.
2000
Establishing nutrient criteria in streams
.
Journal of the North American Benthological Society
19
,
186
196
.
Dynowski
P.
,
Senetra
A.
,
Źróbek-Sokolnik
A.
&
Kozłowski
J.
2019
The impact of recreational activities on aquatic vegetation in alpine lakes
.
Water
11
(
1
).
doi:10.3390/w11010173
.
INWQS
.
2008
Interim National Water Quality Standard
.
Ministry of Environment And Water, Department of Environment (DOE)
,
Putrajaya
,
Malaysia
.
IS:2296
.
1982
Tolerance Limits for Inland Surface Water Subject to Pollution
.
Bureau of Indian Standards
,
New Delhi
.
Kumar
P.
,
Meena
N. K.
&
Mahajan
A. K.
2019
Major ion chemistry, catchment weathering and water quality of Renuka Lake, north-west Himalaya, India
.
Environmental Earth Sciences
78
(
10
),
1
16
.
Lin
R.
1996
Review of assessing methods for coastal eutrophication
.
Marine Environmental Science
15
,
28
31
.
Liu
S.
,
Lou
S.
,
Kuang
C.
,
Wenrui Huang
W.
,
Chen
W.
,
Zhang
J.
&
Zhong
G.
2011
Water quality assessment by pollution-index method in the coastal waters of Hebei Province in western Bohai Sea, China
.
Marine Pollution Bulletin
62
,
2220
2229
.
Miltner
R. J.
&
Rankin
E. T.
1998
Primary nutrients and the biotic integrity of rivers and streams
.
Freshwater Biol.
40
,
145
158
.
Nayek
S.
,
Choudhury
I. H.
&
Roy
S.
2017
Water quality assessment of two constructed lakes (Aritarlake&Chayataal lake) in Sikkim during winter & summer season
.
International Journal of Advance Research
5
(
7
),
1411
1417
.
Nayek
S.
,
Pobi
K. K.
,
Roy
S.
&
Gupta
S.
2018
Hydrochemical study and trophic classification of Aritar Lake: case study from a popular tourist lake in Sikkim Himalaya
.
Environica
2
,
299
304
.
Phu
S. T. P.
2014
Research on the correlation between chlorophyll-a and organic matter BOD, COD, phosphorus, and total nitrogen in Stagnant Lake Basins
. In:
Sustainable Living with Environmental Risks
.
(Kaneko, N., Yoshiura, S., Kobayashi, M., eds).
Springer
,
Tokyo
, pp.
177
191
.
Royer
T. V.
,
David
M. B.
,
Gentry
L. E.
,
Mitchell
C. A.
,
Starks
K. M.
,
Heatherly
T. I. I.
&
Whiles
M. R. W.
2008
Assessment of chlorophyll-a as a criterion for establishing nutrient standards in the streams and rivers of Illinois
.
Journal of Environmental Quality
37
,
437
447
.
Sterner
R. W.
,
Keeler
B.
,
Polasky
S.
,
Poudel
R.
,
Rhude
R.
&
Rogers
M.
2020
Ecosystem services of earth's largest freshwater lakes
.
Ecosystem Services
41
,
101046
.
doi:10.1016/j.ecoser.2019.101046
.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
.
1974
The Relationships of P and N to the Trophic State of Northeast and North-Central Lakes and Reservoirs
.
National Eutrophication Survey
.
WHO
.
2006
Drinking Water Guidelines World Health Organization Standard 2006
.
World Health Organization
,
Geneva
,
Switzerland
.
Xiao
Y.
,
Fereirai
J. G.
,
Bricker
S. B.
,
Nunesi
J. P.
,
Zhu
M.
&
Zhang
X.
2007
Trophic assessment in Chinese coastal systems – review of methods and application to the Changjiang (Yangtze) Estuary and Jiaozhou Bay
.
Estuaries and Coasts
30
(
6
),
901
918
.
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Licence (CC BY 4.0), which permits copying, adaptation and redistribution, provided the original work is properly cited (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).