Abstract
Sludge is one of the by-products of wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs). To assist biological processes, part of the produced sludge is returned to the treatment process and the excess is removed from the treatment plant whereby it undergoes thickening and dewatering. Numerous studies have been conducted to investigate the effect of different coagulants on dewatering from sludge, but the effect of using divalent iron for this purpose has not been investigated so far. In this research, the effect of divalent and trivalent iron compounds (ferrous sulfate and ferric chloride) on the dewatering of excess sludge of the first module of the Bojnourd WWTP (Iran) has been investigated. In this regard, first, the effect of different doses of each coagulant to optimize the dewatering characteristics of sludge was investigated and then the effect of pH change by adding lime was investigated. The results showed that the addition of optimal doses of FeSO4 (0.6 and 0.4 g/l) and lime (0.664 and 1.5866 g/l) reduced the capillary suction time of sludge by 30.6 and 32.7%, respectively, while reducing the moisture content of sludge cake by 26 and 30.6%.
HIGHLIGHTS
A novel methodology of sludge technology.
First implementation of the new materials for sludge dewatering.
INTRODUCTION
In recent years, due to population growth, urban development and giving greater importance to environmental protection, more wastewater has been treated and the amount of excess sludge generated in municipal wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs) has increased (Garrido-Cardenas et al. 2019). Excess sludge often contains contaminants such as pathogens, heavy metals and pesticides, and can adversely affect the quality of the environment, human health and agriculture. For this reason, the treatment and disposal of excess sludge is a major issue in municipal WWTPs (Wu et al. 2017). Control of biological solids (sludge) has been considered complex and difficult due to the large volume of solids and the presence of organic matter (Metcalf et al. 2004). According to available data, each person produces 35–85 g of dry matter daily (Jamshidi et al. 2011). Sludge treatment is one of the most expensive processes available in WWTPs, which accounts for approximately 50% of the operating cost of the wastewater treatment system. The purpose of sludge treatment is to minimize its further decomposition and spread of unpleasant odors, and reduce the volume to economize the treatment, management and disposal (Groff & McLaughlin 1994). To reduce the exorbitant costs of investment, management of treatment facilities, sludge stabilization and prevention of environmental pollution, it is necessary to reduce the volume of sludge produced in WWTPs as much as possible (AbdulAzeez et al. 2016). Thickening and dewatering methods are used for this purpose. Because the sludge is modified, it is easily thickened (concentrated) and dewatered. Therefore, sludge preparation operations are of special importance in WWTPs. Sludge preparation is a two-step process involving coagulation and flocculation. The main purpose of sludge preparation is to increase the particle size, overcome the effects of hydration and repel electric charge between particles. In other words, the preparation of the sludge causes the accumulation of fine dispersed and colloidal particles in the sludge and the release of the bonded water between them. In most cases, chemicals are used to prepare the sludge, which increases the production of sludge (AmanaliKhani et al. 2016).
In addition to the basic processes of sludge treatment (thickening, stabilization and dewatering), it is possible to apply additional treatment procedures, such as thermal drying or even incineration, which further solve the problem of stabilizing sludge and reducing its volume. However, these processes are highly energy-intensive and therefore often represent more expensive solutions to sludge treatment and disposal problems. With regard to the reduction of sludge volume and the increase of dry matter concentration depending on the sludge treatment phase, the values shown in Table 1 can be given. Other authors cite different values of dry matter concentrations in sludge that has undergone different stages of treatment. Thus, for example, Donatello and Cheeseman state that primary and biological sludge usually contain 1–4% dry matter, while further processing (thickening) of sludge achieves concentrations of 3–8% dry matter and the last stage of removal of water from sludge (dewatering) produces a sludge cake with 18–35% dry matter (Donatello & Cheeseman 2013).
Parameter . | Raw sludge . | Thickened sludge . | Dehydrated sludge . | Dried sludge . | Incinerated sludge . |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Dry matter concentration (%) | 1 | 5 | 25 | 90 | 100 |
Volume reduction relative to the raw sludge | 1 | 5 | 25 | 90 | 330 |
Residual volume (%) (relative to raw sludge volume) | 100 | 20 | 4 | 1.11 | 0.30 |
Parameter . | Raw sludge . | Thickened sludge . | Dehydrated sludge . | Dried sludge . | Incinerated sludge . |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Dry matter concentration (%) | 1 | 5 | 25 | 90 | 100 |
Volume reduction relative to the raw sludge | 1 | 5 | 25 | 90 | 330 |
Residual volume (%) (relative to raw sludge volume) | 100 | 20 | 4 | 1.11 | 0.30 |
Numerous studies have been performed on the effect of chemical, organic and polymeric coagulants on sludge dewatering as well as the removal of environmental pollutants. In a study by Guo et al., the effect of modified corn-core powder (MCCP) using sodium hydroxide (NaOH) and cetyltrimethylammonium bromide (CTMAB) surfactant was investigated. The results of this study showed that MCCP as an environmentally friendly, available and cost-effective sludge coagulant can effectively increase the degradability and dewatering of sludge (Guo et al. 2019). Lin et al. (2019)the improvement of dewatering properties of activated sludge using green coagulants of chitosan hydrochloride (CTSCL) and lysozyme (LZM). They investigated the effects of CTSCL, LZM and cationic polyacrylamide (CPAM) as coagulants on sludge dewatering performance against capillary suction time (CST) parameters and specific resistance to filtration (SRF) and moisture examined dewatered sludge. The results of this study showed that LZM coagulant has the best improvement in sludge dewatering and can reduce sludge moisture content after dewatering by 19.84% (Lin et al. 2019). The innovative combination of potassium permanganate (KMnO4) and proximonosulfate (PMS) has been used for sludge dewatering by Luo et al. (2019). Wu et al. (2017) investigated the effectiveness of using coal/FeCl3/KMnO4 to enhance sludge dewatering (changes in sludge properties in the sludge treatment mechanism). The results of his research showed that the optimal doses of KMnO4 and sludge cake charcoal reduce the specific resistance of sludge to filtration (Wu et al. 2017). Improvement of sludge dewatering using the aluminum–iron–starch composite coagulant has been investigated by Lin et al. (2015). In a study by Wu et al., FeCl3-modified rice husk charcoal (MRB-Fe) was used to increase sludge dewatering. They found that with an optimal concentration of FeCl3 (3 mol/l), ultrasound time (1 h) and optimal dose of MBR-Fe (DS 60%), the sludge-specific filtration resistance (SRF) was reduced by 97.9% (Wu et al. 2016). In 2016, Abdulazeez et al. investigated the effect of using Moringa oleifera seed extract along with aluminum sulfate in dewatering sludge. They found that the optimum condition for the 50:50 mixture (w/w) for M. oleifera and alum was SRF = 0.833E + 11, and it was good enough to reduce the amount of alum by only 50.2% compared to using alum only decreases (Abdulazeez et al. 2016). Improved secondary sludge dewatering using a hybrid coagulant–silicon–aluminum–iron–starch was investigated by Lin et al. in 2015. They synthesized a new combination of silicon–aluminum–iron–starch with a bond of silicon, aluminum and iron on the structure of starch and studied its effect on improving the dewatering of secondary sludge. The results of his research showed that when copolymer was added, it had good dewatering efficiency in a wide range of pH (0.11–0.3) and has better dewatering performance compared to coagulants such as polyaluminum chloride (PACl), polyacrylamide (PAM) and ferric chloride (Lin et al. 2015). In the study of Zemmouri et al. in 2015, the effect of chitosan, synthetic cationic polyelectrolyte CF802 (Sed CF802) and ferric chloride (FeCl3) on improving the dewatering of municipal sewage sludge was investigated. The results of their study showed that the use of the optimal dose of chitosan and Sed CF802 reduces the turbidity by 94.86 and 87.85%, respectively, and the optimal dose of FeCl3 reduces the turbidity of the drain by 54.18% (Zemmouri et al. 2015). In 2014, Zhou et al. used a combination of zero-valent iron (ZVI) and hydrogen peroxide (HP) at pH = 2.0 to improve the dewatering capability of excess waste-activated sludge (WAS). They found that using a combination of ZVI (0–750 mg/l) and HP (0–750 mg/l) at pH = 2.0 significantly improved the dewatering capability of excess activated sludge (Zhou et al. 2014). Fitria et al. in 2013 evaluated different shapes of mixers (radial, axial, wheel, three-blade and magnetic), different fast mixing speeds, fast mixing times and coagulation upon sludge dewatering. These experiments showed that using different forms of mixers, different fast mixing speeds and different fast mixing times did not lead to a significant change in CST (Fitria et al. 2013). In a study in 2010, by Chen et al., the improvement of sludge dewatering capacity using coal fly ash modified by sulfuric acid (MCFA) was investigated. The results of this research showed that the SRF of sludge is significantly reduced by adding coal ash and the purification effect of MCFA is much stronger than raw coal fly ash (RCFA) (Chen et al. 2010). AmanaliKhani et al. in 2016 investigated the effectiveness of PAM coagulant modified with aluminum oxide nanoparticles in dewatering the sludge produced by the Yazd WWTP. The results of this study showed that the coagulant aid modified with aluminum oxide nanoparticles at the optimum pH and concentration (4 and 5 mg/l, respectively) has the best performance so that the filtration time and moisture of sludge cake, turbidity of all filtered water solids ratio in the control sample (CPAM) is reduced by about 24.4, 11.2, 57.2 and 58%, respectively (AmanaliKhani et al. 2016).
Improvement of wastewater sludge dewatering using ferric chloride, aluminum sulfate and calcium oxide was investigated by Ranjbar et al. (2021) and the optimal concentration, pH and coagulation/flocculation time were determined. Yang et al. investigated the synergistic effects between CPAM and synthetic fibers, which could improve wastewater sludge dewaterability and resource utilization. They fined the sludge water content decreased 30.0% after conditioning with the combination of CPAM (Yang et al. 2023). Electro-coagulation combined with added free nitrous acid were used for dewatering municipal wastewater sludge by Wang et al. and the optimal applied voltage for EC, the optimal dosage of free nitrous acid and the optimal pH value were determined according to the dewaterability of the sludge (Wang et al. 2022).
It is observed that a lot of research has been done to increase the dewatering efficiency of sludge but previous researchers have not investigated the effect of using divalent iron for dewatering sludge. In the present research, the use of divalent and trivalent iron compounds to increase the dewatering performance of sludge is investigated.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Test method
RESULTS
The effect of optimal doses of coagulants on the dewatering of the inlet sludge of the gravity concentrating unit is summarized in Table 2. As can be seen, the addition of optimal doses of FeSO4 and lime reduced CST of sludge by 30.6 and 32.7% and also reduced the moisture content of sludge cake by 26 and 30.6%. Also, adding optimal doses of FeCl2, Fe2(SO4)3 and FeCl3 with the help of lime coagulant reduced capillary suction of sludge by 35.1, 27.3 and 15.3%, and sludge cake decreased by 36.6, 17.1 and 8.7%, respectively.
Parameter . | Control sample . | Sample (1) . | Sample (2) . | Sample (3) . | Sample (4) . | Sample (5) . |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Coagulant | – | FeSO4 | FeSO4 | FeCl2 | Fe2(SO4)3 | FeCl3 |
Coagulant dose (g/l) | – | 6.0 | 4.0 | 0.1 | 4.0 | 60. |
Dosage of coagulant aid (CaO)(g/l) | – | 6,964.0 | 5,986.1 | 5,986.1 | 5,986.1 | 5,986.1 |
SVI (ml/g) | 133 | 82 | 77 | 76 | 95 | 108 |
CST (s) | 19.4 | 91.2 | 82.2 | 72.2 | 0.3 | 55.3 |
Moisture content of sludge cake (%) | 1.78 | 8.83 | 8.84 | 1.86 | 9.81 | 1.80 |
TSS (mg/l) | 38 | 5 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 6 |
Parameter . | Control sample . | Sample (1) . | Sample (2) . | Sample (3) . | Sample (4) . | Sample (5) . |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Coagulant | – | FeSO4 | FeSO4 | FeCl2 | Fe2(SO4)3 | FeCl3 |
Coagulant dose (g/l) | – | 6.0 | 4.0 | 0.1 | 4.0 | 60. |
Dosage of coagulant aid (CaO)(g/l) | – | 6,964.0 | 5,986.1 | 5,986.1 | 5,986.1 | 5,986.1 |
SVI (ml/g) | 133 | 82 | 77 | 76 | 95 | 108 |
CST (s) | 19.4 | 91.2 | 82.2 | 72.2 | 0.3 | 55.3 |
Moisture content of sludge cake (%) | 1.78 | 8.83 | 8.84 | 1.86 | 9.81 | 1.80 |
TSS (mg/l) | 38 | 5 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 6 |
According to Table 2, it can be said that FeCl2, compared to other coagulants used in this study, can achieve lower SVI and lower TSS. Accordingly, the use of FeSO4 and Fe2(SO4)3 coagulants is the next priority and FeCl3 is not a priority of use compared to other coagulants. Economic issues are also important in choosing a coagulant for WWTPs. Considering that the price of FeCl2 in Iran is lower compared to other coagulants, this coagulant can be suggested due to its better performance.
CONCLUSION
DATA AVAILABILITY STATEMENT
All relevant data are included in the paper or its Supplementary Information.
CONFLICT OF INTEREST
The authors declare there is no conflict.