Many industrial processes produce high fluoride (150–450 mg/L) containing effluent. It may be recovered from the processing plants at the source. One effective technology is selective fluoride adsorption from the waste stream. Metal-organic frameworks (MOFs) are crystalline compounds with high surface area, pore volume, and tuneable pore channels and are suitable adsorbents. This study used zirconium fumarate (ZrFu) MOF to recover the fluoride from iron and steel industrial wastewater collected from blast furnaces and coke plants, respectively. In batch experiments, complete fluoride uptake from synthetic water (150 mg F/L) was obtained with 3 g ZrFu/L (qe = 49.66 mg/g), while for blast furnace (170 mg F/L) and coke plant (130 mg F/L) wastewater, 10 g ZrFu/L was required, (qe = 17 mg/g) and (qe = 13 mg/g), respectively. This difference in adsorbent dose was caused by interfering ions in industrial wastewater, which compete for the same adsorption sites as fluoride ions. Chemisorption was the rate-limiting step, and it conforms to the Langmuir isotherm and the pseudo-second-order model. Fluoride desorption was achieved in deionized water in 1 h. This suggests that the adsorption–desorption process could be scaled up to an industrial process to recover and reuse fluoride from wastewater.

  • Zirconium fumarate (ZrFu) with a high surface area was prepared.

  • Selective fluoride adsorption from industrial wastewater was studied.

  • Complete uptake of fluoride was obtained.

  • The mechanism of fluoride adsorption is the ion-exchange process.

  • Fluoride recovery was possible through adsorption–desorption processes.

Fluoride is one of the reactive non-metallic elements. It combines directly or indirectly with many other elements and generates various fluoride compounds. Most fluoride compounds are stable and generally dissolve in nature. So fluoride remains in the surrounding environment (Loganathan et al. 2013; Halla et al. 2015). Fluoride originates from various sources, such as daily-use products (e.g., dental products, dietary supplements, and beverages), geogenic sources, and industrial production. The fluoride concentration in industrial wastewater is the highest among the different sources of origin, and the pollution level is also high (100–10,000 mg/L) (Wan et al. 2021).

The iron and steel industry, aluminium electrolysis, lead, aluminium, zinc, and copper smelting, rare earth element separation, uranium enrichment, photovoltaic industry, lithium-ion battery industry, cement industry, and thermal power generation are all fluoride-releasing industries (Wan et al. 2021). In the iron and steel industry, fluoride is present in iron smelting, waste gas, wastewater, and slag generated during ore mining, beneficiation, sintering, and smelting, which are essential for steel manufacturing by using a blast furnace. The high-temperature process in steelmaking releases potassium fluoride, sodium fluoride, and other fluoride compounds (Wan et al. 2021). Similarly, metallurgical industries, e.g., copper, zinc, aluminium smelting, etc., generate fluoride in the wastewater. High fluoride-containing wastewater (10,000 mg/L) in copper smelting is challenging to treat (Castillo et al. 2020). In the zinc smelting process, fluoride comes from zinc concentrate electrolytes (1,000 mg/L) (Menad et al. 2003). A tonne of aluminium requires 30 kg of fluoride to be produced (Shan & Guo 2013). Photovoltaic solar panels generate 1,000–3,500 mg/L fluoride-containing wastewater (Drouiche et al. 2007). In the battery industry, hydrofluoric acid contributes to fluoride in wastewater (500 mg/L) (Drouiche et al. 2012). Other industrial processes resulting in fluoride wastewater include uranium enrichment, phosphate fertilizer production, and ceramic, and cement factories (Dehghani et al. 2016).

Physical processes reduce the concentration, but not sufficiently to bring it down to the discharge standard (15 mg/L) (Schedule-VI, Central Pollution Control Board, India, The Environmental Protection Rules, 1986). Treatment of such high fluoride concentrations in industrial wastewater by physical (e.g., adsorption, membrane process) or chemical processes is also difficult (Wu et al. 2017). A literature review shows that various techniques have been reported to treat industrial wastewater with high fluoride concentrations. It can be divided into two categories: (i) chemical processes (such as chemical precipitation and coagulation/electro-coagulation) and (ii) physical processes (such as reverse osmosis (RO), ion-exchange (IX), electrodialysis, and adsorption) (Mohapatra et al. 2009). Fluoride-containing wastewater from the solar cell manufacturing process (Joint National Egyptian Chinese Renewable Laboratory, Egypt) was treated by chemical precipitation with quick lime and potassium hydroxide (Diwani et al. 2022). Hydrated lime was used for the separation of fluoride in wastewater from the fertilizer industry (Zueva et al. 2020). However, chemical precipitation is slow, and it is not efficient to reduce the fluoride concentration up to the discharge limit. Coagulation and chemical precipitation of fluoride produced in the microelectronics industry for wastewater treatment have been reported (Chang & Liu 2007). Similar high fluoride removal was reported in the electro-coagulation process with aluminium electrodes for treating steel industry wastewater (Mobarake Steel Complex, Esfahan, Iran) (Khatibikamal et al. 2010). In the electro-coagulation method, energy consumption and equipment costs are relatively high. Also, the selectivity of electrodes gets reduced frequently. Chemical precipitation and coagulation are the traditional methods of fluoride removal from waste streams (Khatibikamal et al. 2010). However, during precipitation and chemical coagulation processes, a large amount of chemicals is added, resulting in a high amount of fluoride precipitate sludge daily (Wan et al. 2021). Further, membrane technology can reduce fluoride in a wide pH range (Waghmare & Arfin 2015). The hybrid lime and RO system used for wastewater treatment at the aluminium fluoride manufacturing plant was reported to be efficient (Ezzeddine et al. 2015). However, treating high-strength and high-salinity wastewater is difficult, as membranes are frequently fouled (Singh et al. 2013). The coagulation-ultrafiltration process was studied for fluoride removal from wastewater generated in Shanghai, China's semiconductor manufacturing industry (Qiu et al. 2022). However, this process requires a large amount of coagulant. Ion-exchange technology reported up to 90–95% fluoride removal (Meenakshi 2006). However, other ions such as phosphate, sulphate, and bicarbonates in industrial wastewater lower its efficiency. Thus, chemical precipitation, coagulation, membrane processing, and ion-exchange resin used to reduce the fluoride content in the effluent are applicable only for low fluoride concentrations, as they are expensive (Singh et al. 2013). Also, in some cases, it has a low fluoride uptake capacity (Wan et al. 2021).

Among all the processes mentioned above, the adsorption process is considered one of the most promising methods for fluoride uptake because of its high uptake capacity, easy operating conditions, low operational cost, absence of harmful by-products, and low energy consumption (Patel et al. 2016; Dhanasekaran et al. 2017). In a recent study, calcium and zirconium modified acid-activated alumina (CAZ) reported 92% fluoride uptake (Kumari et al. 2020). Similarly, sulphuric acid-activated modified alumina resulted in 94% fluoride uptake from aluminium industry wastewater (National Aluminium Company Limited, Orissa, India) (Kumari et al. 2019). Drinking water treatment residues (polyaluminium chloride used as a coagulant) based on adsorptive material used for the treatment of industrial wastewater (smelting factory, Gyeonggi-do, South Korea) reported 90% fluoride uptake (Jung et al. 2016). The integrated process of calcium hydroxide precipitation and adsorption on hydroxyapatite was also reported to treat fluoride-containing wastewater from the aluminium finishing industry (Xanthi, Greece) (Melidis 2015). Alumina-modified citric acid showed fluoride uptake of 99% from phosphogypsum slag yard mine leachates (Li et al. 2022). These adsorbents show high uptake capacity, but no study on the adsorption–desorption process has been reported.

Metal-organic frameworks (MOFs) have received a lot of attention in recent years for their high fluoride adsorption due to their controllable pore structure, high stability, large surface area, and good physical and chemical properties (Ma & Zhou 2010; Li et al. 2011; DeCoste & Peterson 2014). Their uniform surface structure, comparatively high void ratio, and outstanding chemical and thermal stability make them different from other inorganic porous materials (Eddaoudi et al. 2002; Furukawa et al. 2013). As a super fluoride adsorbent, aluminium fumarate (AlFu) MOF was reported; it has a large specific surface area (1,156 m2/g) and higher uptake capacity (600 mg/g at 25 °C) than previously reported and commercially available water-stable MOFs (Basolite®-MOFs, Merck) (Karmakar et al. 2016). Reuse of AlFu MOF has been reported (Kumari et al. 2022). Similarly, MIL-96(Al) MOF showed high selectivity towards fluoride ions and high pH stability (3–10), with an adsorption capacity of 32 mg/g at 25 °C (Zhang et al. 2014). MOF-801, a zirconium-based MOF, also demonstrated a high rate of fluoride adsorption capacity (Tan et al. 2020). Hydroxyapatite (HAp)-based layered lanthanum-benzene tricarboxylic acid-based MOFs (La-BTC MOFs) showed promising results for fluoride removal from water (Jeyaseelan et al. 2022). However, these MOFs as adsorbents were reported to have low initial fluoride concentrations (2–15 mg F/L) and were formulated with synthetic water.

Zirconium fumarate (ZrFu) MOF has been reported to be thermally, chemically, and water stable, having a large surface area and high fluoride adsorption capacity (Mukherjee et al. 2016). It was prepared from ZrCl4 and fumaric acid as Zr6O4 (–OH)4 (fumarate)6 XH2O. In addition, the presence of Zr-bound-OH groups in the structure improves fluoride adsorption by the ion-exchange process. It has been found effective for fluoride removal in drinking water. But no study has been done to see if fluoride can be selectively separated from industrial wastewater at its source and then reclaimed for use by desorption. This has motivated us to prepare materials suitable for removing fluoride from industrial wastewater. The efficacy of ZrFu MOF as an adsorbent for selective fluoride recovery from industrial wastewater has been prepared and studied. The wastewater was collected from the clarifier tank of the coke plant and blast furnace at the Tata Steel Plant, Jamshedpur, India. Every tonne of steel produced requires 25 m3 of water, and the rate of effluent generation is 5 m3/h (Mukherjee et al. 2016). The wastewater is treated by primary, secondary (biological process), and tertiary (advanced oxidation process) treatment processes, respectively. Fluoride, chloride, nitrate, phosphate, total solids, total dissolved solids, and salinity are all present in high concentrations in the treated water (Mukherjee et al. 2016). In this study, the effects of contact time, pH variation, adsorbent dose, initial concentration, adsorption kinetics, and isotherms were studied with synthetic water to understand the adsorption mechanism and factors affecting the adsorption process. The MOF was then studied for industrial wastewater under optimized conditions. A simultaneous adsorption–desorption study was also carried out for the re-use of the material.

Chemicals

Zirconium oxychloride octahydrate (98%) and fumaric acid (99.5%) were purchased from Loba Chemie Pvt. Ltd, India. N,N-Dimethyl formamide (DMF) (99%) and sodium fluoride (98%) were purchased from Merk Life Science Pvt. Ltd, India. Formic acid (85%) was purchased from Nice Chemical Pvt. Ltd, India. Ethanol (99.9%) was purchased from Changshu Hongsheng Fine Chemical Co., Ltd. The chemicals were used as-received.

Synthesis of ZrFu MOF

Zirconyl chloride octahydrate (1.6 g) and fumaric acid (0.58 g) were mixed with a mixed solvent to make ZrFu MOF. A mixed solvent was prepared by adding DMF (20 mL) and formic acid (7 mL). The mixture was filled in an autoclave (KLB Instruments Co. Pvt. Ltd, India), and it was heated at 130 °C for 6 h in a hot air oven (i-therm, Mumbai, India). The white-coloured precipitate was separated by centrifugation at 8,000 rpm for 20 min (REMI R-24, India). The MOF was washed at least three times with DMF followed by ethanol. Washed ZrFu MOF was dried at 105 °C for 1 day in a hot air oven and then mortar pestle into fine powder. The MOF was then dried at room temperature for 1 h in a vacuum oven (Stericox, Delhi, India) and stored for future use.

Adsorption–desorption study

The adsorption experiments were carried out in 500 mL plastic containers with 100 mL synthetic fluoride solutions (Co = 10 mg/L). At 100 rpm, the experiments were carried out in an orbital shaker (Yorco Sales, Delhi, India). The effects of contact time (10–160 min), the effect of temperature (25–35 °C), the effect of adsorbent dose (0.3–2.0 g/L), the effect of pH (3–10), and the effect of initial fluoride concentration (5–30 mg/L) were studied. Fluoride levels in water were determined using a Fluoride Metre (Extech Instruments, FL700, USA). The fluoride removal efficiency and adsorption capacity were calculated by Equations (1) and (2) (Kumari et al. 2022). Based on the experimental data, fluoride adsorption isotherms and kinetics were studied. The experiments were continued till adsorption equilibrium was achieved, after which there was no change in the fluoride uptake value with increasing the variable parameters mentioned above. An average of three sets of experimental data has been reported.
(1)
where R (%) denotes the fluoride uptake capacity of ZrFu MOF and Co and Ct denote the initial and final fluoride concentrations in the solution, respectively.
(2)
where qe is the amount of fluoride adsorbed per g of ZrFu MOF (mg/g); Co and Ce are the initial and equilibrium concentrations of fluoride in the solution (mg/L) respectively, V is the volume of the solution (L), and m is the weight of ZrFu MOF (g).
Linear form of Langmuir and Freundlich isothermal models are in Equations (3) and (4) (Kumari et al. 2022)
(3)
(4)
where Ce is the solution's equilibrium fluoride concentration (mg/L), qe is the amount of fluoride adsorbed per unit weight of ZrFu MOF (mg/g), qm is the maximum uptake capacity (mg/g), and KL is the Langmuir constant related to energy (L/mg).
Langmuir separation factor (RL) was calculated by the following equation
(5)
where Co is the initial fluoride concentration, KL is the Langmuir isotherm constant, and RL is the dimensionless constant separation factor of the Langmuir isotherm.

After optimizing the operating conditions with synthetic water (150 mg/L), the adsorption study of ZrFu MOF for industrial wastewater was done. The experiments were carried out in 500 mL plastic containers containing 100 mL of synthetic fluoride solutions with compositions ranging from 10 to 150 mg/L (Mukherjee et al. 2016), an adsorbent dose of 1–5 g/L, and an adsorption time of 10–60 min. The tests were carried out in an orbital shaker set to a constant speed of 100 rpm (T = 35 °C and pH = 6). Wastewater was collected (January 2021) in a 10 L Jerry can from the clarifier of the coke plant (CP) and blast furnace (BF) of TATA Steel, Jamshedpur, India. The samples were centrifuged to remove the suspended solids, and the supernatant was used for the experiments. The wastewater was tested for chemical oxygen demand (COD), phosphate, chloride, nitrate, total hardness, and total solids using standard methods for water and wastewater analysis (American Public Health Association (APHA) et al. 1998). The pH was measured using a pH metre (LAB INDIA, Mumbai). The total solid was calculated using the gravimetric method. COD, chloride, and total hardness of the samples were estimated by the titration method. The nitrate and phosphate concentrations of the samples were determined by a UV–Vis spectrophotometer (Systronics 119, Mumbai). The fluoride desorption study was performed by adding 100 mL of DI water to the exhausted MOF. The mixture was shaken for 1 h at 100 rpm and 35 °C in a shake flask. The concentration of fluoride in the water was determined after the reaction. The regenerated MOF was again used in a fresh batch of synthetic and industrial wastewater. This process continued for several cycles for synthetic and industrial wastewater, respectively.

Characterization of MOFs

The structural characterization of the ZrFu MOF was conducted by an X-ray diffraction technique (XRD) using an X-ray diffractometer (Rigaku, Japan, Smart Lab 9Kw). Brunauer–Emmett–Teller (BET) analysis was performed at 77 K using a surface area analyser (Quantachrome Instruments, USA) to estimate the surface area, pore diameter, and pore volume of ZrFu MOF. The surface morphology of ZrFu MOF was analysed by a Field emission scanning microscope (FESEM; SM-6390LV, Jeol, Japan). The functional groups of the samples before and adsorption studies were analysed using Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy (IR-Prestige 21, Shimadzu Corporation, Japan, IR-Prestige 21).

Characterization of ZrFu MOF

The as-synthesized ZrFu MOF was characterized by XRD, surface area analyser and FESEM. The XRD pattern of the as-synthesized ZrFu MOF shows characteristic peaks that look similar (2Ɵ values) to MOF-801 reported earlier (Tan et al. 2020; Figure 1(a)). The XRD pattern reveals that the as-prepared MOF was highly crystalline and successfully synthesized. The surface area of as-prepared ZrFu MOF is 537.54 m2/g, the pore volume is 0.229 cm3/g, and the pore radius is 1.813 nm, according to BET analysis. The N2 adsorption–desorption isotherm of ZrFu MOF shows typical type-I curves, which indicates that the micro-porous structure and the adsorption on the MOF is based on monolayer adsorption. The SEM image of ZrFu MOF shows a uniform morphology with octahedron particle shapes and particle sizes ranging from 90 to 100 nm (Figure 1(b)).
Figure 1

XRD pattern (a) and SEM image of ZrFu MOF (b).

Figure 1

XRD pattern (a) and SEM image of ZrFu MOF (b).

Close modal

Factors affecting fluoride uptake capacity of ZrFu MOF

ZrFu MOF was chosen among some of the water-stable MOFs (MIL-96, AlFu, ZIF-8, ZIF-67, and CuBTC) because it showed complete fluoride uptake capacity under the given operating conditions (MOF dose of 1 g/L, Co = 10 mg F/L, pH = 6, and T = 35 °C) (Supplementary Figure S1). The experiments were conducted in a shake flask. The study shows that the fluoride uptake capacity of the MOFs varies from one another. Under similar operating conditions, the ZrFu MOF showed 100% fluoride uptake compared to other studied MOFs. The variation in the MOFs adsorption could be due to differences in (i) electrostatic adsorption, (ii) complexation mechanisms (Zhu et al. 2018; Jeyaseelan et al. 2020), and (iii) surface area/volume ratio. Increased fluoride uptake capacity was observed in ZrFu MOF due to Zr+4 compared to Al+3, Zn+2, Co+2, and Cu+2. The positively charged higher valence ion (Zr) present in the synthesized MOF attracts more negatively charged fluoride ions by electrostatic attraction and complexation (Zhu et al. 2018). The functional groups (e.g., carboxylate group, hydroxyl group) present on the MOF structure provide active sites for the adsorption of fluoride (Ke et al. 2018). Thus, ZrFu MOF was selected for further studies.

The reaction time to reach the adsorption equilibrium was determined to be from 10 to 160 min with an initial fluoride concentration of 10 mg/L. The fluoride uptake capacity was rapid at the initial stage, and then it continued to adsorb at a slower rate. The initial higher uptake of fluoride indicates that the fluoride ions occupied the readily available binding sites on the outer layer of the MOF. The slower fluoride uptake after 30 min was due to the slow diffusion of fluoride ions inside the micro-porous structure of ZrFu MOF (Dey et al. 2004). In this study, equilibrium was reached after 120 min of the reaction, and no change in the fluoride uptake was observed despite increasing the reaction time (Figure 2(a)). Similar results were obtained earlier (Mukherjee et al. 2016). The effect of pH on fluoride adsorption was studied (Figure 2(b)). The decrease in fluoride uptake capacity with increased pH was due to the electrostatic interaction between the ZrFu MOF and fluoride. Acidic pH facilitates protonation of the ZrFu MOF surface and consequently makes many positively charged active sites (Zr–OH2+) per unit area accessible. As a result, the fluoride uptake capacity increases at low pH due to electrostatic interaction between the positively charged adsorbent surface and the negatively charged fluoride ions (Zr–F bonds). The adsorbent surface turns negatively charged at basic pH levels. The capacity of fluoride adsorption decreases, as electrostatic repulsion between fluoride and adsorbent increases. Data from the literature on the relationship between the zeta potential and pH of ZrFu MOF and hydrous Zr oxide support this result (Dou et al. 2012; Ke et al. 2018). The effect of the adsorbent dose on fluoride uptake from the synthetic solution was studied with a concentration of 10 mg F/L at an operating condition of T = 35 °C, t = 120 min, and pH = 6.1. The adsorption capacity, qe (mg/g), was investigated using MOF doses ranging from 0.3 to 2.0 g/L. The fluoride removal percentage increased from 56 to 96%, with an increased dose from 0.3 to 2.0 g/L of solution. This was due to the availability of the active sites on the adsorbent surface until equilibrium was achieved. Fluoride removal of 96% was achieved at 1 g/L; after that, it remained constant (Figure 2(c)). Correspondingly, the uptake capacity decreased with increased adsorbent dose; this indicates the ratio of fluoride ions available per unit adsorbent decreased with increased loadings. The initial concentration of fluoride in synthetic wastewater varied from 5 to 30 mg/L with an adsorbent dose of 1 g/L, T = 35 °C, t = 120 min, and pH = 6.1. The fluoride removal efficacy decreased from 98 to 80% with an increased concentration of fluoride in the solution under the operating conditions (Figure 2(d)). At low fluoride concentrations, there were a greater number of adsorption sites available than at higher fluoride concentrations; thus, the adsorption process was rapid. Thus, one of the limiting factors in the adsorption process is the initial concentration of fluoride ions in the solution and the available adsorption sites. The effect of temperature (25, 35, 45, and 55 °C) on fluoride uptake (Co = 10 mg/L, t = 120 min, pH = 6.1, adsorbent dose = 1 g/L) was investigated, and it was discovered that above 35 °C, there was no improvement in fluoride uptake (Ke et al. 2018). Thus, all the experiments were carried out at 35 °C (Figure 2(e)). The above experimental results were used to calculate the fluoride adsorption isotherms models for Langmuir and Freundlich. The study shows that ZrFu MOF-fluoride adsorption supports the Langmuir monolayer isotherm model compared to the Freundlich multilayer adsorption model (Table 1). The Langmuir separation factor (RL) was between 0 < RL < 1, so the nature of the adsorption process was favourable (Dou et al. 2012). The experimentally determined adsorption kinetics indicates that a pseudo-second-order model favours chemisorptions. Similar results were reported earlier (Tan et al. 2020).
Table 1

Study of isothermal constants for fluoride adsorption

Isotherm modelLangmuirFreundlich
Isotherm parameters Qm (mg/g) = 20.10 KF (mg/g) (L/mg)1/n = 8.78 
KL (L/mg) = 1.24 n = 2.41 
R2 = 0.99 R2 = 0.95 
Isotherm modelLangmuirFreundlich
Isotherm parameters Qm (mg/g) = 20.10 KF (mg/g) (L/mg)1/n = 8.78 
KL (L/mg) = 1.24 n = 2.41 
R2 = 0.99 R2 = 0.95 
Figure 2

Fluoride adsorption at different (a) reaction time, (b) pH, (c) adsorbent dose, (d) initial concentration, and (e) temperature.

Figure 2

Fluoride adsorption at different (a) reaction time, (b) pH, (c) adsorbent dose, (d) initial concentration, and (e) temperature.

Close modal
Similar batch adsorption experiments were conducted with synthetic water at an operating condition (Co = 150 mg F/L, T = 35 °C, pH = 6–7, t = 60 min). Figure 3(a) shows that the uptake capacity of ZrFu MOF increased from 37.33 to 100% as the MOF content was increased from 1 to 4.5 g/L. Adsorption equilibrium was reached at 3 g/L (R = 99.3%). The pH of the synthetic water increased from 6.1 to 7.5 after the reaction. This indicates that the mechanism of fluoride uptake by the MOF was ion-exchange, where a fluoride ion replaced the OH ion in the MOF structure. The possible chemical reaction was suggested earlier (Tan et al. 2020).
Figure 3

Fluoride uptake capacity (%) of ZrFu MOF at different adsorbent dose in (a) synthetic water, (b) coke plant, and (c) blast furnace wastewater.

Figure 3

Fluoride uptake capacity (%) of ZrFu MOF at different adsorbent dose in (a) synthetic water, (b) coke plant, and (c) blast furnace wastewater.

Close modal

The high selectivity of ZrFu MOF for fluoride ions was due to the comparatively higher electronegativity and electron-withdrawing property of fluorine compared to halogen elements and oxygen. This results in the replacement of hydroxyl ions by fluoride ions on ZrFu MOF. In addition, the octahedral structure of ZrFu MOF improves the accessibility of the exchange site. It increases diffusion in the entire structure of the MOF, which improves the uptake capacity of the MOF (Tan et al. 2020).

A similar study with blast furnace and coke plant wastewater having an initial concentration of 170 and 130 mg/L, respectively, and different contents (2, 3, 4, 6, 8, and 10 g/L) of ZrFu MOF was conducted. More than 90% of fluoride uptake for coke plant wastewater was obtained with 3 g ZrFu/L. Complete uptake was obtained with 10 g ZrFu/L (Figure 3(b)). In a similar study with blast furnace wastewater, 4 g ZrFu/L achieved more than 90% fluoride uptake and 10 g/L achieved complete uptake (Figure 3(c)). Both of these reactions were carried out for 60 min. While optimizing the reaction time, almost complete fluoride uptake was obtained within 5 min of the reaction, with 10 g ZrFu/L for the wastewater studied. This shows that the reaction with ZrFu MOF was rapid, indicating the presence of many active sites, which help quick fluoride uptake from wastewater. The wastewater characteristics of the coke plant and blast furnace show that the concentration of fluoride competing ions (Cl, , , ) was high for comparable active sites (Table 2). The concentration of coexisting anions before and after the adsorption with ZrFu MOF in coke plant and blast furnace wastewater was studied. Interestingly, after the adsorption process, only phosphate concentration was reduced in coke plant and blast furnace wastewater. This indicates that ZrFu MOF selectively adsorbs fluoride from the solution, and phosphate competes with fluoride for the same active site. Similar observations were reported earlier (Ke et al. 2018).

Table 2

Characteristic of coke plant and blast furnace wastewater before and after adsorption process

CharacteristicsCoke plant (as-received)Coke plant (after adsorption)Blast furnace (as-received)Blast furnace (after adsorption)
Fluoride (mg/L) 130 ± 2 0.6 ± 0.1 170 ± 2 1 ± 0.2 
Chloride (mg/L) 1,350 ± 2 1,349.6 ± 2 1,799 ± 2 1,796.4 ± 1 
Phosphate (mg/L) 7.45 ± 1 2.13 ± 1 5.85 ± 1 2.57 ± 1 
Nitrate (mg/L) 10.64 ± 1 10.62 ± 2 11.9 ± 2 11.6 ± 2 
Total hardness (mg/L CaCO359 ± 1 60 ± 2 39.6 ± 2 42 ± 1 
pH 7.3 ± 0.2 7.7 ± 0.3 7.1 ± 0.1 7.6 ± 0.2 
CharacteristicsCoke plant (as-received)Coke plant (after adsorption)Blast furnace (as-received)Blast furnace (after adsorption)
Fluoride (mg/L) 130 ± 2 0.6 ± 0.1 170 ± 2 1 ± 0.2 
Chloride (mg/L) 1,350 ± 2 1,349.6 ± 2 1,799 ± 2 1,796.4 ± 1 
Phosphate (mg/L) 7.45 ± 1 2.13 ± 1 5.85 ± 1 2.57 ± 1 
Nitrate (mg/L) 10.64 ± 1 10.62 ± 2 11.9 ± 2 11.6 ± 2 
Total hardness (mg/L CaCO359 ± 1 60 ± 2 39.6 ± 2 42 ± 1 
pH 7.3 ± 0.2 7.7 ± 0.3 7.1 ± 0.1 7.6 ± 0.2 

The pHzpc of hydrous zirconium oxide was 6.7 (Dou et al. 2012). In the present study, ZrFu MOF was protonated when the solution pH was less than 6.7 and deprotonated when the solution pH was above 6.7 (Figure 4(a) and 4(b)). Protonation allows the breaking of Zr–O bonds, replacing oxygen with fluorine (Figure 4(c)). Figure 5 shows the adsorption peak at 1,425 and 1,602 cm−1 before adsorption, which indicates the bending vibration of Zr–OH groups (Dou et al. 2012). The peaks have enlarged after adsorption, and the emergence of peaks at 1,056 and 1,139 cm−1 shows that fluoride has taken the position of hydroxyl groups. Since the study range was 400 cm−1 and beyond, the peaks of the Zr–F stretching and F–Zr–F bending vibrations, which appear around 375–475 cm−1 and 250–350 cm−1, respectively, were not seen. A comparative study of the performance of different MOFs reported for fluoride removal from water indicates that the uptake capacity of the MOFs is different due to differences in the morphology and composition of the MOFs. ZrFu MOF in the present study performed much better than other Zr MOFs or Zr-based MOF adsorbents (Supplementary Table S1).
Figure 4

Possible mechanisms of fluoride adsorption on ZrFu MOF include (a) protonation, (b) deprotonation, and (c) ion-exchange mechanisms.

Figure 4

Possible mechanisms of fluoride adsorption on ZrFu MOF include (a) protonation, (b) deprotonation, and (c) ion-exchange mechanisms.

Close modal
Figure 5

FTIR spectra before and after fluoride adsorption.

Figure 5

FTIR spectra before and after fluoride adsorption.

Close modal

Recovery of ZrFu MOF

ZrFu MOF (10 g/L) was added to synthetic wastewater (150 mg F/L) and reused several times. Figure 6(a) shows the fluoride adsorption–desorption cycle in synthetic water. For the first three cycles (C1–C3), the fluoride uptake capacity was greater than 90%. After that, it gradually decreased in consecutive cycles of operation, and finally, after the 7th cycle, it reached a steady uptake of 70% until the 10th cycle of operation (C10). Similar experiments were carried out with coke plant (130 mg F/L) and blast furnace (170 mg/L) wastewater, respectively (Figure 6(b) and 6(c)). The fluoride uptake capacity of coke plant wastewater decreased from 99 to 80% after the first adsorption–desorption cycle; the uptake capacity decreased in subsequent cycles until it reached 62% after the fourth cycle and continued until the sixth cycle (C4–C6) (50 mg F/L). Similar results were obtained with blast furnace wastewater, the uptake capacity decreased from 99 to 65% in the 2nd cycle of operation, and after that, it remained constant until the 6th cycle (C2–C6) (60 mg F/L). This indicates that the adsorption–desorption process results in 60–65% fluoride recovery from wastewater even after repeated use. The study shows that the efficacy of MOF regeneration decreases after each cycle of adsorption–desorption; this could be due to the strong chemical bonding between ZrFu MOF and fluoride (chemisorption process), which decreases the regeneration efficiency. However, 60–65% recovery of fluoride from wastewater could still be helpful for the industries to recover from the waste stream.
Figure 6

Fluoride recovery from (a) synthetic water, (b) coke plant, and (c) blast furnace wastewater following adsorption–desorption cycles.

Figure 6

Fluoride recovery from (a) synthetic water, (b) coke plant, and (c) blast furnace wastewater following adsorption–desorption cycles.

Close modal

This study reported fluoride recovery from industrial wastewater by adsorption using ZrFu MOF. The morphology, porous structure, and fluoride uptake capacity were studied systematically. Different process parameters showed that the fluoride uptake capacity improved with an increase in MOF addition in the batch reactor and reaction time. Fluoride adsorption followed the Langmuir adsorption isotherm and the pseudo-second-order rate law, according to kinetic studies. ZrFu MOF absorbed fluoride completely from synthetic water, coke plant wastewater, and blast furnace wastewater, with uptake capacities of 49.66, 13, and 17 mg/g, respectively. Because of the high surface area of ZrFu MOF (538 m2/g), it quickly absorbed fluoride from wastewater and reached adsorption equilibrium. When the solution pH was less than pHZPC, protonated hydroxyl groups encouraged fluoride attraction to ZrFu MOF. The MOF regeneration studies showed that ZrFu MOF reaches a steady fluoride uptake capacity after repeated adsorption–desorption cycles. This is C7 (70%) for synthetic water, C4 (62%) for coke plants, and C2 (65%) for blast furnace wastewater. This variation was due to (i) a different initial fluoride concentration and (ii) with or without interfering ions at the same adsorption sites in the solution. Thus, fluoride may be recovered on-site through the adsorption column by an adsorption–regeneration cycle operation.

R.K. acknowledges the Ministry of Education (GoI), for the doctoral fellowship.

All relevant data are included in the paper or its Supplementary Information.

The authors declare there is no conflict.

APHA, AWWA, WEF
1998
Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater, 20th edn. American Public Health Association/American Water Works Association/Water
,
Environment Federation, Washington, DC, USA
.
Castillo
N. A. M.
,
Briano
S. A. C.
,
Ramos
R. L.
,
Pirajan
J. C. M.
,
Dosal
A. T.
,
Gutierrez
L. G.
,
Delgado
G. J. L.
,
Perez
R. O.
,
Estupinan
J. P. R.
,
Lopez
S. Y. R.
&
Mendoza
M. S. B.
2020
Use of bone char prepared from an invasive species, pleco fish (Pterygoplichthys spp.), to remove fluoride and Cadmium (II) in water
.
Journal of Environmental Management
256
,
109956
.
Chang
M. F.
&
Liu
J. C.
2007
Precipitation removal of fluoride from semiconductor wastewater
.
Journal of Environmental Engineering
133
,
419
425
.
DeCoste
J. B.
&
Peterson
G. W.
2014
Metal-organic frameworks for air purification of toxic chemicals
.
Chemical Reviews
114
,
5695
5727
.
Dehghani
M. H.
,
Haghighat
G. A.
,
Yetilmezsoy
K.
,
McKay
G.
,
Heibati
B.
,
Tyagi
I.
,
Agarwal
S.
&
Gupta
V. K.
2016
Adsorptive removal of fluoride from aqueous solution using single- and multi-walled carbon nanotubes
.
Journal of Molecular Liquids
216
,
401
410
.
Dey
S.
,
Goswami
S.
&
Ghosh
U. C.
2004
Hydrous ferric oxide (HFO) – a scavenger for fluoride from contaminated water
.
Water, Air, & Soil Pollution
158
,
311
323
.
Dhanasekaran
P.
,
Sai
P. M. S.
&
Gnanasekar
K. I.
2017
Fixed bed adsorption of fluoride by Artocarpus hirsutus based adsorbent
.
Journal of Fluorine Chemistry
195
,
37
46
.
Diwani
G. E.
,
Amin
S. K.
,
Attia
N. K.
&
Hawash
S. I.
2022
Fluoride pollutants removal from industrial wastewater
.
Bulletin of the National Research Centre
46
,
143
152
.
Dou
X.
,
Mohan
D.
,
Pittman
C. U.
&
Yang
S.
2012
Remediating fluoride from water using hydrous zirconium oxide
.
Chemical Engineering Journal
198–199
,
236
245
.
Drouiche
N.
,
Ghaffour
N.
,
Lounici
H.
&
Mameri
M.
2007
Electrocoagulation of chemical mechanical polishing wastewater
.
Desalination
214
,
31
37
.
Drouiche
N.
,
Aoudj
S.
,
Lounici
H.
,
Mahmoudi
H.
,
Ghaffour
N.
&
Goosen
M. F. A.
2012
Development of an empirical model for fluoride removal from photovoltaic wastewater by electrocoagulation process
.
Desalination and Water Treatment
29
,
96
102
.
Eddaoudi
M.
,
Kim
J.
,
Rosi
N.
,
Vodak
D.
,
Wachter
J.
,
O'Keeffe
M.
&
Yaghi
O. M.
2002
Systematic design of pore size and functionality in isoreticular MOFs and their application in methane storage
.
Science
295
(
5554
),
469
472
.
Ezzeddine
A.
,
Meftah
N.
&
Hannachi
A.
2015
Removal of fluoride from an industrial wastewater by a hybrid process combining precipitation and reverse osmosis
.
Desalination and Water Treatment
55
,
2618
2625
.
Furukawa
H.
,
Cordova
K. E.
,
O'Keeffe
M.
&
Yaghi
O. M.
2013
The chemistry and applications of metal-organic frameworks
.
Science
341
(
6149
),
1230444
.
Halla
V. J. L.
,
Esmeralda
V. A.
,
Luis
F. A. J.
,
Horacio
F. Z.
&
Rene
R. M. J.
2015
Water defluoridation with special emphasis on adsorbents-containing metal oxides and/or hydroxides: a review
.
Separation and Purification Technology
150
,
292
307
.
Jeyaseelan
A.
,
Naushad
M.
&
Viswanathan
N.
2020
Development of multivalent metal-ion-fabricated fumaric acid-based metal-organic frameworks for defluoridation of water
.
Journal of Chemical Engineering Data
65
(
6
),
2990
3001
.
Jeyaseelan
A.
,
Kumar
I. A.
,
Viswanathan
N.
&
Naushad
M.
2022
Development and characterization of hydroxyapatite layered lanthanum organic frameworks by template method for defluoridation of water
.
Journal of Colloid and Interface Science
622
,
228
238
.
Jung
K. W.
,
Hwang
M. J.
,
Jeong
T. U.
,
Chau
D. M.
,
Kim
K.
&
Ahn
K. H.
2016
Entrapment of powdered drinking water treatment residues in calcium-alginate beads for fluoride removal from actual industrial wastewater
.
Journal of Industrial and Engineering Chemistry
39
,
101
111
.
Karmakar
S.
,
Dechnik
J.
,
Janiak
C.
&
De
S.
2016
Aluminium fumarate metal-organic framework: a super adsorbent for fluoride from water
.
Journal of Hazardous Materials
303
,
10
20
.
Ke
F.
,
Peng
C.
,
Zhang
T.
,
Zhang
M.
,
Zhou
C.
,
Cai
H.
,
Zhu
J.
&
Wan
X.
2018
Fumarate-based metal-organic frameworks as a new platform for highly selective removal of fluoride from brick tea
.
Scientific Reports
8
,
1
11
.
Khatibikamal
V.
,
Torabian
A.
,
Janpoor
F.
&
Hoshyaripour
G.
2010
Fluoride removal from industrial wastewater using electrocoagulation and its adsorption kinetics
.
Journal of Hazardous Materials
179
,
276
280
.
Kumari
R.
,
Kumar
A.
&
Basu
S.
2022
Aluminium fumarate-based polymer matrix composite for selective removal of fluoride from ground water
.
Environmental Nanotechnology, Monitoring & Management
17
,
100642
.
Li
J. R.
,
Ma
Y.
,
McCarthy
M. C.
,
Sculley
J.
,
Yu
J.
,
Jeong
H.-K.
,
Balbuena
P. B.
&
Zhou
H. C.
2011
Carbon dioxide capture-related gas adsorption and separation in metal-organic frameworks
.
Coordination Chemistry Reviews
255
,
1791
1823
.
Li
Y.
,
Yang
Y.
,
Qu
G.
,
Ren
Y.
,
Wang
Z.
,
Ning
P.
,
Wu
F.
&
Chen
X.
2022
Reuse of secondary aluminum ash: study on removal of fluoride from industrial wastewater by mesoporous alumina modified with citric acid
.
Environmental Technology & Innovation
28
,
102868
.
Loganathan
P.
,
Vigneswaran
S.
,
Kandasamy
J.
&
Naidu
R.
2013
Defluoridation of drinking water using adsorption processes
.
Journal of Hazardous Materials
248–249
,
1
19
.
Meenakshi
M. R. C.
2006
Fluoride in drinking water and its removal
.
Journal of Hazardous Materials
137
,
456
463
.
Menad
N.
,
Ayala
J. N.
,
Carcedo
F. G.
,
Ayucar
E. R.
&
Hernandez
A.
2003
Study of the presence of fluorine in the recycled fractions during carbothermal treatment of EAF dust
.
Waste Management
23
,
483
491
.
Mohapatra
M.
,
Anand
S.
,
Mishra
B. K.
,
Giles
D. E.
&
Singh
P.
2009
Review of fluoride removal from drinking water
.
Journal of Environmental Management
91
,
67
77
.
Mukherjee
R.
,
Mondal
M.
,
Sinha
A.
,
Sarkar
S.
&
De
S.
2016
Application of nanofiltration membrane for treatment of chloride rich steel plant effluent
.
Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering
4
,
1
9
.
Patel
S. B.
,
Swain
S. K.
,
Jha
U.
,
Patnaik
T.
&
Dey
R. K.
2016
Development of new zirconium loaded shellac for defluoridation of drinking water: investigations of kinetics, thermodynamics and mechanistic aspects
.
Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering
4
,
4263
4274
.
Qiu
Y.
,
Ren
L. F.
,
Xia
L.
,
Shao
J.
,
Zhao
Y.
&
Bruggen
B. V.
2022
Investigation of fluoride and silica removal from semiconductor wastewater with a clean coagulation-ultrafiltration process
.
Chemical Engineering Journal
438
,
135562
.
Singh
K.
,
Lataye
D. H.
,
Wasewar
K. L.
&
Yoo
C. K.
2013
Removal of fluoride from aqueous solution: status and techniques
.
Desalination and Water Treatment
51
,
3233
3247
.
Tan
T. L.
,
Krusnamurthy
P. A/P.
,
Nakajima
H.
&
Rashid
S. A.
2020
Adsorptive, kinetics and regeneration studies of fluoride removal from water using zirconium-based metal organic frameworks
.
Royal Society of Chemistry Advances
10
,
18740
.
Waghmare
S. S.
&
Arfin
T.
2015
Fluoride removal from water by various techniques: review
.
International Journal of Innovative Science, Engineering & Technology
2
,
560
571
.
Wan
K.
,
Huang
L.
,
Yan
J.
,
Ma
B.
,
Huang
X.
,
Luo
Z.
,
Zhang
H.
&
Xiao
T.
2021
Removal of fluoride from industrial wastewater by using different adsorbents: a review
.
Science of the Total Environment
773
,
145535
.
Zhang
N.
,
Yang
X.
,
Yu
X.
,
Jia
Y.
,
Wang
J.
,
Kong
L.
,
Jin
Z.
,
Sun
B.
,
Luo
T.
&
Liu
J.
2014
Al-1,3,5-benzenetricarboxylic metal-organic frameworks: a promising adsorbent for defluoridation of water with pH insensitivity and low aluminium residual
.
Chemical Engineering Journal
252
,
220
229
.
Zhu
X. H.
,
Yang
C. X.
&
Yan
X. P.
2018
Metal-organic framework-801 for efficient removal of fluoride from water
.
Microporous Mesoporous Materials
259
,
163
170
.
Zueva
S. B.
,
Ferella
F.
,
Taglieri
G.
,
Michelis
I. D.
,
Pugacheva
I.
&
Veglio
F.
2020
Zero-liquid discharge treatment of wastewater from a fertilizer factory
.
Sustainability
12
(
1
),
397
410
.
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Licence (CC BY 4.0), which permits copying, adaptation and redistribution, provided the original work is properly cited (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

Supplementary data