The coagulation/flocculation technique is an old proven method that utilizes chemical coagulants for water purification but there are health and environmental challenges associated with the long-term application of such coagulants. Cellulose fibre is a renewable, eco-friendly polymer found in many materials. It has been widely researched due to its unique properties, especially when processed in the ‘nano’ form as cellulose nanocrystals (CNCs) but nanocelluloses require surface functionalization in order to improve their suitability for various applications. The aim of this review is to provide an in-depth discussion of the current progress in the synthesis of CNCs with recourse to their source, surface chemistry and extraction procedures. Various techniques used for the conversion of CNCs into coagulants were extensively reviewed while the current development on the potential application of CNCs as a coagulant for water remediation was presented. The results obtained from the potential application of modified CNC-based coagulants demonstrate their remarkable coagulation efficiency for the purification of contaminated water. Therefore, global research into the development of CNC-based coagulants at all levels is crucial in order to generate interest in natural coagulants as a potential replacement for chemical coagulants. Furthermore, potential areas for more research were proposed in this review.

  • Cellulose fibre obtained from plant biomass as a precursor for the production of cellulose nanocrystals (CNCs) was appraised.

  • An assessment of recent techniques for the modification of CNCs was provided.

  • Functional groups incorporated onto the CNCs surface improve their performance as coagulants for removal of specific contaminants.

  • The production methods for CNCs coagulants involve the ‘Green chemistry approach’.

Global environmental pollution has been greatly affected by the rapid population increase, economic expansion and other environmental issues, which is alarming in terms of its negative effects on water quality. Water pollution refers to the undesirable change in the physico-chemical characteristics of water which could be detrimental to humans and the ecosystems. Water pollution can adversely affect humans, the aquatic biota and the economic development of a nation (He 2015). Statistics provided by the United Nations International Children Emergency Fund (UNICEF) show that more than 1.5 million cases of death from water-related diseases have been recorded due to the consumption of contaminated or poorly treated water. According to reports, 90% of these occurrences involve children below 5 years of age (Noori et al. 2019). In order to ensure improved water quality and ensure compliance with stipulated regulatory agencies, the removal of impurities becomes crucial. Achieving good water quality can be accomplished by using the appropriate treatment technology (Oelofse et al. 2016). Several treatment technologies have been successfully employed for water purification. These include chemical precipitation, adsorption, electrocoagulation, advanced oxidation, ion exchange and other biological processes among others (Wiesmann et al. 2007; Omar et al. 2018; Othmani et al. 2022; Al-hashimi et al. 2023). Most of these treatment options are expensive to run, especially for small- and medium-sized industries and sometimes, may necessitate the use of significant quantities of chemicals for effective treatment. Additionally, effluent containing recalcitrant contaminants are known to corrode treatment reactors, which reduces the efficacy of the treatment facility (Ukiwe et al. 2014; Muruganandam et al. 2017).

The coagulation/flocculation (CF) technique is a renowned treatment method recognized for its effectiveness in treating various water matrixes. The CF technique is accepted globally due to its cost-effective and ecologically friendly process, simplicity of use and potential for automation for enhanced performance (Fard et al. 2016; Wei et al. 2018). Furthermore, due to its unique characteristics, the CF method can be used in conjunction with other treatment methods (Sahu & Chaudhari 2013; Ukiwe et al. 2014; Muruganandam et al. 2017). Although the terms ‘coagulation and flocculation’ are interchangeable, coagulation refers to the neutralization of negatively charged colloidal particles (contaminants) in water by using coagulants with opposite charge. As a result, the finely distributed suspension becomes unstable and aggregates. Flocculation, on the other hand, is the gentle mixing or stirring of the aqueous medium to facilitate the growth of the agglomerated particles into larger flocs which settle under gravity and are removed by filtration (Teh et al. 2016; Dayarathne et al. 2021). Chemical coagulants that are utilized for the remediation of polluted water include the salts of aluminium e.g. aluminium sulphate (Al2(SO4)3 and aluminium chloride (AlCl3) and salts of iron e.g. ferric chloride (FeCl3) and ferric sulphate (FeSO4). These coagulants have demonstrated high efficiency in removing toxic substances, suspended/dissolved solids and other pollutants (Parmar et al. 2011; Omar et al. 2018). Aluminium sulphate (alum) is the most often used coagulant in water purification. It is effective for the removal of alkalinity as shown in Equation (1) (Parmar et al. 2011). The water's alkalinity and the alum combine to form an insoluble metal hydroxide floc that completely covers the colloidal particles. A decrease in the average number of molecular weight values occurred during the coagulation process, which proves that a significant portion of the high molecular weight natural organic matter (NOM) molecules were eliminated by the alum (Parmar et al. 2011).
(1)

In a recent study, Al-Hashimi et al. (2023) created an engineered adsorbent using quartz sand coated with calcium ferric oxides (QS/CFO) generated from wastepaper sludge ash (WPSA). The adsorbents were used to eliminate tetracycline (TC) from simulated wastewater. According to the results of the batch coagulation studies, the designed adsorbent could remove up to 90% of the TC (21.96 mg/g) in about 180 min. In a similar research, Jalal et al. (2021) studied the efficiency of aluminium-based coagulant by applying aluminium chloride alone and in combination with alum to eliminate the organic matter, turbidity and colour from textile wastewater. Coagulation experiments were conducted and the findings indicated a 98, 98 and 99% decrease in colour, chemical oxygen demand (COD) and turbidity, respectively, at pHs between 6.5 and 7.5.

Unfortunately, chemical coagulants have some adverse health and environmental implications. Researchers have reported the possibility of re-contaminating treated water and groundwater with residual aluminium that could be a threat human at elevated concentrations (Mathuram et al. 2018; Maćczak et al. 2020). A substantial amount of hazardous sludge and secondary pollutants are also produced by these synthetic chemical coagulants, which are non-biodegradable and may affect the ecosystem (Mathuram et al. 2018; Kurniawan et al. 2020; Maćczak et al. 2020; Zaman et al. 2020). The search for safer and eco-friendly coagulants has led to renewed interest in natural coagulants as an alternative to chemical coagulants. Natural coagulants of plant origin have been utilized traditionally for water purification for centuries before the advent of chemical coagulants. Their long-standing usage is due to their superior performance and simple operation (Teh et al. 2016). They are also known as biopolymers since they are from plant and animal-based materials such as agricultural wastes (fruit peels, husks, plant stems), fish bladders and shells of crabs and crustacean (Choy et al. 2015; Nandini & Sheba 2016). These natural coagulants are easily degradable, renewable, eco-friendly and produce a smaller volume of sludge (Kiew & Chong 2017). Plant-based biopolymers such as starch, cellulose and gelatine are much preferred and researched as possible alternatives to chemical coagulants due to their availability and natural abundance (Choy et al. 2015; Trache 2018). Cellulose is the most abundant, sustainable biopolymer in existence, with a unique composition that enhances its suitability for several industrial purposes (Vazquez et al. 2015). The application of cellulose for making greener and more substantial industrial products is attributed to its no-carbon footprint and unique properties that allow for chemical modification (Vazquez et al. 2015; Hamad 2017). Nanocelluloses, such as cellulose nanocrystals (CNCs), can be produced from cellulose. The CNCs are rod-shaped cellulose particles with at least one dimension equal to or less than 100 nm and have a highly crystalline structure (Alatawi et al. 2018). Investigations into the morphology of the CNCs have revealed their exceptional mechanical and elastic properties (high specific strength and modulus), large specific surface area, high aspect ratio, ultralow density, tunable porous structure, low environmental impact and reduced production cost (Mathew et al. 2014; Larissa et al. 2015; Thompson et al. 2019). Nanocelluloses have low coagulation performance when utilized in their natural form and require some surface modification to improve their coagulation capabilities. The introduction of cationic or anionic functionalities on the surface of nanocelluloses by modification techniques like oxidation, etherification, esterification and polymerization reaction, improve their compatibility and adsorption efficiency for the removal of specific pollutants from water (Rana et al. 2021).

Currently, there is limited and fragmented information in literature on the correlation between cellulose and CNCs and the progress made in improving their performance as natural coagulants. This article, therefore, provides an overview of cellulose, its composition and properties which makes it a high-performing natural biopolymer of interest, especially when utilized in the nanoform as CNCs. It discusses the synthesis of CNCs and the recent modification strategies employed for improving their performance as coagulants. Furthermore, this review presents areas for more global research in the development of CNC-based coagulants.

Coagulation process

Coagulation is the process by which the elements that contribute to a suspension's stability are eliminated, and the suspension subsequently destabilizes to form agglomerates. The term ‘flocculation’ describes the gentle mixing or agitation of the destabilized water in order to promote the development of the coagulated particles into bigger, more dense flocs that separate from the water via a sedimentation or precipitation mechanism (Teh et al. 2016). A coagulant is an electrolyte that, when dissolved in water, produces ionic charges that are opposite to the stable colloidal particles (and other contaminants) in water. Wastewaters contain particles that are negatively charged at a pH between 5 and 9. For this reason, the particles are well-dispersed and resistant to agglomeration. Therefore, coagulants are needed to destabilize the particles and induce agglomeration (Teh et al. 2016). The addition of coagulants neutralizes the opposing charges on the colloidal particles while the neutralization effect produces a spongy jelly-like mass known as ‘floc’ (Sahu & Chaudhari 2013; Muruganandam et al. 2017). The chemical coagulants frequently utilized in water treatment include Al2(SO4)3, aluminium sulphate hydrate [Al2(SO)3·14H2O], potash alum [KAl(SO4)2·12H2O], polyaluminium chloride [Aln(OH)mCl3n-m], ferrous sulphate (FeSO4·7H2O), ferric sulphate (Fe2(SO4) and ferric chloride (FeCl3) (Parmar et al. 2011; Omar et al. 2018). These electrolytes are hydrolyzed in solution to form agglomerated hydroxides that adhere to the surface of particles present in water. Flocculants (ionic or non-ionic polymers) are sometimes introduced into the treatment stream usually after the addition of inorganic coagulants, in order to increase the rate of agglomeration of the coagulated particles. Subsequently, the agglomerated particles settle under gravity and are filtered out of the water (Maćczak et al. 2020).

The coagulation–flocculation approach with chemical coagulants has been proven by research to be successful. Further investigations, however, have shown that these inorganic coagulants may be left in treated water in trace amounts. The long-term build-up of aluminium in the blood and brain has been linked to severe encephalopathy, Alzheimer's disease, dementia and autism in recent studies (Muruganandam et al. 2017; Mathuram et al. 2018; Marey 2019; Gautam & Saini 2020). Controversies surrounding aluminium's neurotoxicity exist as several researchers have disputed its association with Alzheimer's disease. They affirm that only extremely low quantities of aluminium reach the brain because excess aluminium is expelled from the body rather than retained. Nevertheless, the application of chemical coagulants for water remediation must be done with caution due to these opposing views (Kurniawan et al. 2020). Another related health risk is the utilization of synthetic polymers for water treatment. Some synthetic polymeric coagulant derivatives have low biodegradability properties and cannot be completely degraded during water treatment. They generate carcinogenic and hazardous intermediate by-products which are highly toxic to life forms (Oladoja et al. 2017; Mathuram et al. 2018). Ecosystems can be adversely affected by inorganic and polymeric coagulants. Treated water containing high levels of residual aluminium or metal salts can seep into groundwater or re-contaminate water sources through surface runoff, thereby destroying the ecosystems. In modern water purification technology, polymeric coagulants derived from natural sources (plants and animals) are being researched as a potential substitute for chemical coagulants due to their low cost, biodegradability and eco-friendly properties. The performance of bio-coagulant for the removal of pollutants from wastewater has been confirmed by researchers and their efficacy and capability as possible alternatives to the generally used chemical coagulants have been proposed (Kurniawan et al. 2020). A schematic presentation of the coagulation process is depicted in Figure 1.
Figure 1

Water purification via coagulation/flocculation process. Adapted with permission from Teh et al. (2016). Copyright (2016) American Chemical Society.

Figure 1

Water purification via coagulation/flocculation process. Adapted with permission from Teh et al. (2016). Copyright (2016) American Chemical Society.

Close modal

Mechanism of coagulation/flocculation

The basic coagulation mechanisms which occur during water treatment are (1) charged neutralization, (2) adsorption/polymer bridging, (3) sweep or precipitative flocculation and (4) double-layer compression. The coagulation mechanism may occur successively or in combination with other types. The type of mechanism prevalent during a water treatment process is influenced by the type of coagulant used and the characteristics of the water matrix (Maćczak et al. 2020; Dayarathne et al. 2021).

Charge neutralization/adsorption mechanism

Charge neutralization mechanism involves the use of ionizable chemicals or polymeric materials (polyelectrolytes) to induce the coagulation of organic matter. It occurs when polyelectrolytes of highly charged density and oppositely charged to the colloidal particles, are adsorbed by the particles of lower charge density in a ‘patch-wise’ manner. This forms patches of positive and negative sites on the top layer of the particles. Due to the presence of sorbed polyelectrolyte patches, the colloidal particles have both negatively and positively charged areas that will be drawn to one another, creating a mechanism for flocculation. Thereafter, the added coagulants tend to neutralize the charged particles, lowering the electrostatic repulsion effect and promoting particle aggregation as shown in Figure 2 (Muruganandam et al. 2017; Mathuram et al. 2018). The neutralizing effect is detected by a decrease in zeta (ζ) potential (electrokinetic). The zeta potential is vital for the formation of intermolecular forces like van der Waals' attractive forces, which promote the aggregation and sedimentation of formed flocs. The adsorption process occurs when particles adhere to the cationic hydrolysis products (FeOH2+ and AlOH3+) formed during CF at a low pH (Dayarathne et al. 2021).
Figure 2

Adsorption of negatively charged colloidal particles onto positively charged iron hydroxide precipitates (Charge neutralization/adsorption) (Mathuram et al. 2018).

Figure 2

Adsorption of negatively charged colloidal particles onto positively charged iron hydroxide precipitates (Charge neutralization/adsorption) (Mathuram et al. 2018).

Close modal

Adsorption/interparticle bridging mechanism

Adsorptive and bridging coagulation mechanisms occur when a polymer chain that can adhere to multiple particles is formed by a coagulant. It involves the attraction of two long-chain polymers towards the colloidal particles, which eventually bind onto the surface. In some cases, polymer bridging precedes polymer adsorption (Amran et al. 2018). The mechanism occurs where polymers with high molecular weight (greater than 106 Da) have charges similar to the agglomerated particles. It also applies to non-ionic particles with a repulsive force greater than the electrostatic attractive forces. Polymer bridging requires a substantial amount of coagulant to ensure that particles overcome the colloidal repulsion (Kurniawan et al. 2020). The first step involves the uniform dispersal of the polyelectrolyte via diffusion into the solid–liquid interface of the solution. A functional group is initially adsorbed on the colloidal particles while the remaining polymer chain extends unattached into the solution. Several loops and tails which are the main basis for the bridging mechanism are thus formed and suspended in the solution. The loops and tails provide links for other particles to attach themselves, thereby aggregating into larger flocs (Alwi et al. 2013; Dayarathne et al. 2021). Brownian continuous motion causes the chain to become adsorbed at more points along its length until eventually there are no free ends in the solution phase (Maćczak et al. 2020). Figure 3 shows the formation of floc by the bridging coagulation mechanism. The adsorptive/polymer bridging mechanism is peculiar to natural coagulants (biopolymers) utilized for water purification.
Figure 3

Adsorption and bridging via loops and tails formation (Dayarathne et al. 2021).

Figure 3

Adsorption and bridging via loops and tails formation (Dayarathne et al. 2021).

Close modal

Constriction of the electrical double layer

In the presence of liquid, a charged surface develops an electrical double layer (EDL). The surfaces in the context of coagulation and flocculation might be high molecular weight macromolecules or precipitates of metallic oxyhydroxides. The constriction mechanism utilizes an excess coagulant with a highly charged density to alter the concentration of water and compress the electric double layer around the particle. The compression effect is removed when the repulsive forces within the particles are reduced. The DLVO theory, formulated by Derjaguin, Landau Verwey and Overbeek (Oyegbile et al. 2016), stipulates that the influence of attractive forces such as van der Waals becomes prevalent when the use of excess electrolytes decreases the double electrical layer. As the repelling force weakens, the molecular attraction between the particles is induced and the particles begin to aggregate into macro flocs. This process leads to the production of flocs. Agglomeration occurs when the critical coagulation concentration, which varies depending on the experimental conditions (mixing, time of measurement), is exceeded. The EDL plays a significant role in colloidal systems due to the extremely high relative surface area to volume ratio (Dayarathne et al. 2021).

Sweep mechanism

Sweep coagulation, also known as precipitate coagulation, occurs when colloidal particles get enmeshed in precipitates of metal hydroxides resulting in greater removal efficiency when compared with the neutralization mechanism. Large aggregates (sweep flocks) are formed after the neutralization reaction occurs. Thereafter, the attractive force between these flocs and residual colloidal particles causes further agglomeration (as shown in Figure 4) which settles as sludge. This mechanism occurs frequently in wastewater with a low suspended solids content (10 mg/L) (Mathuram et al. 2018). In sweep coagulation, a high initial coagulant dosage is needed for efficient coagulation, which unfortunately results in a large volume of sludge being produced. Polyelectrolyte-based coagulants can only be used for double-layer compression, bridging/adsorptive mechanism or charge neutralization, but not for sweep coagulation (Amran et al. 2018; Maćczak et al. 2020).
Figure 4

Sweep coagulation (humic acid/colloids enmeshed into neutral iron hydroxide flocs) (Mathuram et al. 2018).

Figure 4

Sweep coagulation (humic acid/colloids enmeshed into neutral iron hydroxide flocs) (Mathuram et al. 2018).

Close modal

In conclusion, the CF process has been recognized as an essential method for treating water with a complex matrix and a range of contaminant concentrations. The chemical coagulants frequently utilized in water treatment include Al2(SO4)3, Al2(SO)3·14H2O, KAl(SO4)2·12H2O, Aln(OH)mCl3n-m, FeSO4·7H2O, Fe2(SO4) and FeCl3. The coagulation mechanisms that occur during water treatment are primarily charged neutralization, adsorption/polymer bridging, sweep or precipitative flocculation and double-layer compression. The coagulation mechanism may occur successively or in combination. The type of mechanism prevalent during a water treatment process is influenced by the type of coagulant used and the characteristics of the water matrix. The use of chemical and synthetic polymeric coagulant has been discovered to be toxic to human health and the ecosystems. Therefore, in modern water purification technologies, polymeric coagulants from natural sources (e.g. plants) are being studied as a possible alternative to chemical coagulants because of their low cost, biodegradability and eco-friendliness.

Cellulose, an insoluble polymer, was initially identified by Anselm Payen more than 150 years ago (Huber et al. 2012). Cellulose exists in the cell walls of vascular green plants, cotton plants, algae, bacteria and tunicates (Trache et al. 2017; Shak et al. 2018). It accounts for about 1.5 × 1012 tons of the total annual biomass generated by plants through photosynthesis. Cotton fibre is made up of about 90% cellulose, which is the highest in plants, while wood consists of 45–50% cellulose. Ramin and flax (also known as bast fibres) contain cellulosic materials within the range of 70–80% (Börjesson & Westman 2015; Abdullah et al. 2021).

Source of cellulose

Natural biomaterials such as plants, algae, bacteria, fungi and tunicates are the main sources of cellulose fibre. Before being processed into nanocelluloses and other derivatives, cellulose must first be removed from its source (Kargarzadeh et al. 2017). The size, properties and amount of energy utilized in the extraction and conversion of cellulose to nanocellulose are greatly influenced by the source of the cellulose biopolymer. Cellulose contained in plant fibres is one of the well-researched primary sources of nanocellulose with a variety of applications. The plant-derived cellulose fibres are preferred over other cellulose derived from other sources like the tunicate and bacteria because they produce thinner nanofibres and are readily available in larger quantities (Chirayil et al. 2014). Tunicates, specifically members of the Subphylum Tunicata, are the only aquatic invertebrate species with the ability to synthesize cellulose microfibrils (CMF). Cellulose extracted from tunicates is made up of almost pure CI allomorph cellulose with high crystallinity. Its nano/microfibrils' distinctive features include a low density, an aspect ratio between 60 and 70%, a large surface area between 150 and 170 m2/g and reactive surfaces (Zhao et al. 2015). Bacteria-based cellulose (BC) may be secreted by certain types of bacteria as a by-product of their metabolic activities. Gluconacetobacter xylinus is the most researched cellulose-producing bacterial genus. This species produces CMF as an exo-polysaccharide, mostly consisting of water (99%) under special culturing conditions (Campano et al. 2016). Various species of algae such as grey, red and brown algae are sources of cellulose. Species such as Valonia, Micrasterias denticulate, Micrasteriasrotate, Coldophora and Boerogesenia can synthesize CMF in their cell walls. Due to their superior capacity to absorb carbon dioxide compared with bacteria, algae can be used for environmental clean-up. This would help reduce the concentration of greenhouse gas in the environment (Hua et al. 2015; Shak et al. 2018).

Cellulose composition

Molecular composition of cellulose

The d-anhydrogluco-pyranose unit (AGU), also referred to as a glucose unit (i.e. cellulose) and having the molecular formula (C6H10O5)n, is connected by a 1,4-glycosidic bond, which holds together a linear isotactic homopolymer like cellulose. The 1,4-linked, d-glucose molecules are arranged as linear chains, with each CI glucose molecule linked to the next at the C4 position as shown in Figure 5 (Vazquez et al. 2015; Kang et al. 2016). The cellulose molecule consists of unlinked hemiacetal/aldehyde at the reducing end group (C1 position), the free hydroxyl group at the C4 locations (non-reducing group) and internal glucosidal ring at both non-reducing end groups (C1 and C4 locations). Three hydroxyl groups exist at the C6, C3 and C2 positions of each internal AGU. The hydroxyl groups at C6 also referred to as the primary alcohol are the most reactive while those at the other locations are the less reactive secondary alcohols (Börjesson & Westman 2015; Tavakolian et al. 2020). Hydroxyl groups determine the chemical character and reactivity of cellulose in the AGU. Their presence on the cellulose surface enables cellulose functionalization. Due to the extensive hydrogen bond network that the hydroxyl groups in cellulose create, it is not soluble in the majority of liquids, including water and organic solvents. It is necessary to break both the intra- and intermolecular hydrogen bonds in order to increase the solubility of cellulose in liquid media (Kang et al. 2016).
Figure 5

The molecular structure of cellulose (Sunasee & Hemraz 2018).

Figure 5

The molecular structure of cellulose (Sunasee & Hemraz 2018).

Close modal

Cellulose's supramolecular composition

Cellulose chains are prone to aggregation and the formation of strongly ordered structures and structural entities. This may be due to their extremely regular molecular structure, the stiffness of the molecular chain and the strong hydrogen bonds which facilitate molecular arrangement and aggregation (Lindman et al. 2017). Nishikawa and Ono, through the use of a highly defined X-ray diffraction pattern, discovered the supramolecular structure of fibrous cellulose in 1913. This discovery revealed the arrangements of individual cellulose molecules in a ‘para-crystalline’ form (Zugenmaier 2021). In the early 20th century, scientists asserted that cellulose was an oligomeric, perhaps ring-shaped glucan with up to 100 glucose units. These discoveries coupled with the proven statements of Staudinger on the macromolecular structure, led to the development of the fringed fibrillar model of cellulose by scientists, which is now the widely accepted concept of the supramolecular structure. According to the supramolecular model, the cellulose chain is arranged in parallel alignment into crystallite fibres (Moon et al. 2011). Since the alignment of molecules in a cellulose fibre is not constant in the structure, it is presumed that areas of varying amount of disorientation or disorder also exists. The hydrogen linkage between the C6–OH and C3–OH is known to be the main factor responsible for the structure and uniform fibre alignment in cellulose. Similarly, the regular spatial occurrences and abundant hydroxyl groups regulate the stability of the interchain interactions (Kang et al. 2016; Zugenmaier 2021).

Structural (hierarchical) arrangement of cellulose

Cellulose occurs as a long chain of single molecules that could be spun into agglomerates of cellulose fibres in a hierarchical order during biosynthesis. The single cellulose chains merge or coalesce into elementary fibrils (protofibrils) of various orientations. The factors that govern its biosynthesis affect the various arrangements of elementary fibrils. Their diameters are usually below 20 nm, depending on the cellulose source (Jonoobi et al. 2015). The coalescence of the primary fibrils lowers the surface's free energy, resulting in the production of CMF with a diameter of around 3.5–50 nm and a length of 7 m. The microfibrils produced could further align into larger forms called macrofibrils that are about 60–300 nm wide, to form the familiar cellulose fibres as depicted in Figure 6. Intermolecular forces such as van der Waals forces and intra- and intermolecular hydrogen bonds, aid in the aggregation of the elementary fibrils. The microfibrils are composed of amorphous regions formed from disordered chains and crystallites formed from closely packed cellulose chains held closely by complex hydrogen bonds (Kang et al. 2016; Lindman et al. 2017).
Figure 6

Hierarchical form of cellulose isolated from plants (Rojas et al. 2015).

Figure 6

Hierarchical form of cellulose isolated from plants (Rojas et al. 2015).

Close modal

Cellulose has four main polymorphs based on its molecular orientations and intermolecular/intramolecular interactions. They are cellulose type 1 and its two crystalline allomorphs, cellulose type II, III and type IV cellulose (Trache et al. 2017). The properties of each type vary among the polymorphs and are influenced by the source from which the cellulose is obtained (Shak et al. 2018). Cellulose type I is a natural polymer and occurs as cellulose Iα (triclinic structure) and cellulose Iβ (monoclinic structure). Both forms (Iα and Iβ) are similar to each other but the packing pattern in the lattice differs, due to varying degrees of hydrogen bonding existing between the chains. Cellulose Iα is often derived from microbial and algal species, while cellulose Iβ is found in the cell walls of higher plants (George & Sabapathi 2015; Joseph et al. 2020). Cellulose II, also known as regenerated cellulose, is a more soluble crystalline form, produced after recrystallization or mercerization of cellulose with sodium hydroxide solution. The main distinction between cellulose type I and type II is in the manner their atoms are packed: cellulose II has anti-parallel packing, while cellulose I have a parallel or aligned arrangement. The treatment of cellulose type I and II with ammonia yields cellulose IIII and IIIII, respectively, while further treatment of cellulose type III yields the cellulose type IV (Gopakumar 2018; Wohlert et al. 2022).

In summary, cellulose (C6H10O5) is an essential biopolymer with distinctive characteristics like low toxicity, low density, high tensile strength and strong mechanical properties. It has been identified as the most abundant, sustainable biopolymer in existence, with a unique composition which makes it applicable for diverse industrial applications. Although cellulose can be found in plant cell walls and organisms like tunicates, bacteria and algae, plant-derived cellulose fibres are preferred over others because they are readily available and more abundant in nature. Cellulose consists of highly organized structures and structural entities in its cellulose chains. This is due to the regular molecular structure of cellulose, the rigid molecular chain and the strong hydrogen bonds that facilitate molecular arrangement and aggregation cellulose can exist in several polymorphs or allomorphs because of the various inter- and intramolecular arrangements. It can be categorized into four types of polymorph: cellulose I, II, III and IV. The physico-chemical parameters vary between these polymorphs.

Extraction of cellulose from plant biomass

The utilization of cellulose as flocculants is often limited due to its comparatively low chemical reactivity and insolubility in water. To address these deficiencies, cellulosic materials must be chemically engineered to improve their reactivity and compatibility for the elimination of contaminants from wastewater. An exponential rise in surface area, crystallinity, hydroxyl group and aspect ratio may be achieved by converting cellulose into CNC. Meanwhile, cellulose must first be separated from the biomass to facilitate reactions with chemical reagents and the removal of impurities before CNC production (Yoon et al. 2014; Shak et al. 2018). The common methods for the extraction of CNCs from cellulose are the mechanical technique, chemical hydrolytic process, biological hydrolytic technique or a combination of all the above methods (Yang et al. 2019). However, since cellulose is composed of glucose molecules, linked together by β-1-4-glucosidic bond, a process that involves the partial disintegration of the β-1-4-glucosidic molecular bond will be the best option for the isolation of CNC from cellulose. This is why the chemical technique using acid hydrolysis is often preferred as it facilitates the disintegration of the bonds (Shak et al. 2018). Chemical treatment is a well-known and widely used process that breaks the disordered and amorphous parts of the cellulose, releasing single and well-defined crystals in the process. In the first stage of the cellulose extraction process, alkali and acid-chlorite treatments are used to pre-treat the biomass precursor in order to remove hemicelluloses and lignin from the core cellulosic component (Phanthong et al. 2018; Sharma et al. 2019). Alkaline treatment has long been regarded as one of the most economical treatments for surface modification. During the cellulose extraction process, the biomass is hydrolyzed to enhance the removal of hemicelluloses and other impurities like wax, lignin, fats, pectin and protein using alkaline solutions. Thereafter, sodium chlorite acidified with glacial acetic acid or hydrogen peroxide/sodium hydroxide solution is used to remove the residual lignin from the cellulose. This step is also known as bleaching or delignification (Ravindran et al. 2019; Sharma et al. 2019). The delignification process improves the crystallization potential, enhances interfacial bonding and improves cellulose fibre compatibility for modification. As a result, the mechanical characteristic of the cellulose fibres is greatly enhanced (Lefatshe et al. 2017).

Conversion of cellulose to CNCs via acid hydrolysis

CNC is commonly produced by the chemical (acid) hydrolysis of nano and microfibrillated cellulose. During the hydrolysis, the acids release hydronium ions which easily react with the available oxygen on the glycosidic bonds of the amorphous regimes, thereby initiating the protonation of the oxygen element. This facilitates the hydrolytic cleavage of the glycosidic molecular bonds and results in the release of individual nanocrystals (Vazquez et al. 2015; Hamad 2017). The disordered or amorphous domains that occur as chain dislocations in some parts of the cellulose fibres are more susceptible to chemical reactions due to the weak hydrogen bonds and decreased steric hindrance. As a result, amorphous portions are more readily hydrolyzed by acids than the regularly aligned sections, which are more hydrolysis-resistant (Trache et al. 2017). Mineral acids, the most common of which is sulphuric acid, are the most used reagents for the extraction of CNCs (Hamad 2017; Sunasee & Hemraz 2018). During the production of CNCs, the cellulose is hydrolyzed using 55–64% H2SO4 for 45–60 min and thereafter, the reaction is stopped (after completion) by using 10-fold deionized water and NaOH solution for repeated rinsing of the CNC until a near-neutral pH solution is obtained. The sulphate functionality added to nanocellulose during an acidic reaction, which accelerates breakdown tendencies and results in cellulose with lower heat stability, is a significant drawback of H2SO4 hydrolysis. This affects the potential application of nanocellulose, particularly when used for strengthening nanocomposite materials. The use of mineral acids other than H2SO4 for the hydrolysis of cellulose polymer has, therefore, been the subject of study in recent years. Hydrochloric acid (HCl), phosphoric acid, hydrobromic acid, organic solvent or a combination of both organic and inorganic acids have all been used to create CNCs with unique properties (Lizundia et al. 2016; Trache et al. 2017). Cellulose hydrolyzed by HCl has been successfully employed to produce CNCs. This was performed by using HCl to dissolve the amorphous material from the crystalline regions of cellulose, leaving behind crystals with essentially neutral surfaces and hydroxyl groups as the only functional group (Lizundia et al. 2016). The nanocrystals formed (HCl-CNC) possess strong hydrogen bond formation, low colloidal stability and a high propensity to aggregate. The colloidal stability of HCl-CNCs is influenced by their concentration in an aqueous medium; the higher their concentration, the more pronounced the aggregates produced. Nevertheless, CNCs formed by HCl hydrolysis have higher thermal stability than nanocrystals produced by H2SO4 hydrolysis (Xie et al. 2018a, 2018b). The presence or absence of a charge on CNC is influenced by the type of acid treatment used during the hydrolysis of the cellulose fibre. CNCs produced from HCl treatment have no surface charge (i.e. neutral) while H2SO4 will impact 0.5–2% anionic sulphate half-ester (–OSO3–) groups onto the synthesized CNCs surface. The sulphated CNCs are electrostatically stable and possess high colloidal stability in water due to the repelling force between the negative charges (Lizundia et al. 2016; Trache et al. 2017).

A variety of experiments have focused on the replacement of liquid acids with solid acids in recent times. Liu et al. (2014) described a renewable process for the synthesis of CNCs from purified hardwood pulp via hydrolysis in distilled phosphotungstic acid crystals (H3PW12O40). They obtained cylindrical-shaped CNCs with diameters between 15 and 40 nm and lengths greater than several hundred nanometres. Their findings revealed that the CNCs produced were more thermally stable in comparison to sparsely sulphated CNCs. Furthermore, the acid crystals utilized in the synthesis could be easily extracted with the aid of diethyl ether and re-used for subsequent hydrolysis. However, there are some limitations to this procedure, such as the high cost of the acid crystals, the prolonged hydrolysis time and the low yield it produces (Kargarzadeh et al. 2018). The operation time may be reduced from 30 h to 10 min when solid phosphotungstic acid is used in conjunction with the sonication process, with a 225 sonication capacity being the ideal setting. This results in CNCs with about 88% crystallinity and 85% yield (Bee et al. 2016). Another method for producing CNCs involves the hydrolysis of cellulose precursors with gaseous acid. This operation is performed using a variety of gaseous acids, including HCl, HNO3 and trifluoroacetic acid (Kontturi et al. 2011). During the preparation, wet cellulose is hydrolyzed by a combination of high moisture and acidic gas that is absorbed by the cellulose fibres. As the acidic gas reacts with the moisture in the cellulosic material, a large amount of acid is generated locally. The cellulose amorphous domains and local interfibril interactions experience a high degree of hydrolysis because of this effect. For further defibrillation and the production of CNCs, mechanical treatment such as grinding or ultrasonication is required for this method (Kargarzadeh et al. 2018). A schematic representation of the extraction process of CNCs from cellulose is presented in Figure 7.
Figure 7

Schematic representation of the preparation procedure for CNCs (Sunasee & Hemraz 2018).

Figure 7

Schematic representation of the preparation procedure for CNCs (Sunasee & Hemraz 2018).

Close modal

In conclusion, cellulose must first be purified to remove non-cellulosic components such as proteins, waxes, lignin and hemicellulose. The removal of these components results in the separation of individual cellulose fibres. Thus, the amorphous phase of cellulose is more susceptible to the cleavage of glycosidic bonds, and further hydrolysis with acids e.g. H2SO4 result in nanostructures with higher crystallinity like the CNCs, than the original fibre. In recent decades, more research into the use of chemical reagents and methods other than H2SO4 for hydrolysis of cellulose polymer has been conducted in order to produce CNCs with better surface characteristics. Chemical reagents such as HCl, hydrobromic acids, organic solvent and phosphotungstic acid crystals among others have been employed for the production of CNCs.

Crystallinity

The crystalline form of CNCs could be attributed to the parallel alignment of cellulose chains, facilitated by the strong inter-hydrogen linkage and van der Waals attractive force. The degree of crystallinity of CNC is the ratio of the mass of the crystalline regions to the overall mass of the CNCs. It is theoretically about 100% if the amorphous region is completely removed, but the presence of residual disordered region will affect its crystallinity (Tang 2016). The degree of CNCs crystallinity is influenced by the source and conditions for extraction, which is widely acknowledged to be within the range of 54 and 90% (Sinha et al. 2015). For example, rutabaga, flax and wood cellulose nanofibrils (CNFs) have a crystallinity of 64, 59 and 54%, respectively, while the crystallinity of CNCs isolated from rice husk, cotton, sisal and commercial microcrystalline cellulose (MCC) were found to be 76, 94, 85.9 and 81.7%, respectively (Rojas et al. 2015). For some common fruits, their crystallinity content occurs in the order of pineapple > banana > jute and corresponds to the quantity of cellulose measured in these samples. In addition, CNCs extracted with H2SO4 normally have lower crystalline values than those made with HCl. The most popular technique for determining the crystalline index of CNC is Segal's method, which applies the following equation in calculating crystallinity from X-ray diffractometer (XRD) spectra (Thompson et al. 2019).
(2)
where ICr is the crystallinity index, I002 represents both crystalline and amorphous regions taken at 2ϴ = 22.6 intensity and Iam is the amorphous region taken at 2ϴ = 18 intensity (Thompson et al. 2019). Segal's method makes crystallinity determination for cellulose and its derivatives fast and simple. However, since it is a relative calculation, there are certain concerns with this approach in terms of precision.

Surface area

The specific surface area of cellulose nanoparticles is usually high with values between 50 and 200 g/m2. The large specific surface area contains a lot of exposed hydroxyl group that improves their suitability for grafting or crosslinking with other compounds (Rojas et al. 2015; Lizundia et al. 2016). Furthermore, nanocellulose possesses a high adsorption potential due to its high specific surface area, which can be further improved by chemical modification. This means that it has a very high potential for use as an adsorption material in the research fields of water purification and other related fields (Shen et al. 2020).

Aspect ratio

Length (L) and diameter (D) are the physical dimensions which determine the aspect ratio (L/D) of CNCs. Thus, the aspect ratio of CNCs could be defined as the ratio of their length to diameter. The lengths of CNCs are within the range of 100 nm to μm and the widths could be less than 10 nm to around 50 nm (Thompson et al. 2019). The large range in the dimension of CNC may be attributed to several single fibres not being sufficiently separated during the production process. CNC has a significant aspect ratio due to the small width of the extracted nanofibres which ranges from a few nanometres to an average length of micrometres (Thompson et al. 2019; Yang et al. 2019). CNCs with a high aspect ratio facilitate the formation of percolated networks at low concentrations due to their needle-like structure, which largely enhances their flocculating properties. Furthermore, a higher aspect ratio greatly increases the viscosity of CNC suspensions (Tang 2016). Several factors like the biopolymer from which cellulose is derived and their hydrolytic reaction conditions influence the aspect ratio of CNCs. Tunicates and BC have been reported to have larger dimensions than CNCs derived from wood or cotton. Nanocrystalline particles generated from hardwood had a diameter and length of 3–5 nm and 100–300 nm, respectively. Furthermore, CNCs with better crystallinity are produced with purer cellulose materials (Thompson et al. 2019).

Mechanical properties

Investigations into the morphology of CNCs have revealed their excellent mechanical and elastic properties. Their low weight and rigidity contribute to their application as a reinforcement material. At low filler loading, nanocellulose has proven to be a significant insulator, with a modulus of elasticity of up to 150 GPa and a low thermal expansion coefficient of 0.01 ppm/K. Nanocellulose has a tensile strength ranging from 7.5 to 7.7 GPa, which is higher than that of steel wire and general carbon fibre, even though its density (1.6 g/cm3) is about one-fifth that of steel (Kargarzadeh et al. 2017; Thompson et al. 2019; Shen et al. 2020). XRD technique and atomic force microscopy (AFM) are indirect experimental measurements employed along with theoretical equations for the calculation of the elastic properties of CNCs. However, some difficulties encountered in quantifying the tensile modulus and resistance of CNCs are due to the limitations in calculating the mechanical properties of nanomaterials along multiple axes (George & Sabapathi 2015).

Rheological property

The rheological properties of CNCs suspension are influenced by analytical conditions (e.g. temperature, concentration of suspension, pH, shear rate, etc.) and other intrinsic factors such as gelation and liquid crystalline properties (Rojas et al. 2015). In diluted CNC suspensions, shear-thinning patterns appear, illustrating the impact of concentration, particularly at low concentrations. At significant levels, a peculiar pattern where the suspensions are lyotropic occurs. This could be attributed to the alignment of rod-shaped nanocrystals at a critical shear rate. After the shear rate reaches a critical level, the chirality of CNCs suspension disintegrates to a fundamental nematic structure, but if their aspect ratio is high, their viscosity may be enhanced (George & Sabapathi 2015; Tang 2016). The type of acid used to hydrolyze CNCs suspensions may also affect their rheological properties. Nanocrystals produced via H2SO4 hydrolytic reactions exhibit some shear-thinning effect that is unaffected by the length of time while nanocrystals produced by HCl treatment significantly exhibit higher shear-thinning. HCl-treated nanocrystals are anti-thixotropic at low concentrations and become thixotropic at high concentrations. CNCs suspension may become permanently agglomerated when dry, thereby affecting their size and peculiar properties. Horrification is the term used for irreversible agglomeration, which could be caused by the development of rigid hydrogen linkages. Agglomeration of CNCs can be avoided when a freeze-drying technique or supercritical drying is applied in the drying process (Baheti et al. 2013; Rojas et al. 2015).

Thermal properties

A crucial factor in the practical usage of CNCs is their thermal property. Understanding their thermal behaviour is, therefore, essential. Compared with hemicelluloses, nanocelluloses are more thermally stable and have a decomposition temperature of 350 °C (Rojas et al. 2015; Tang 2016). Furthermore, some factors which include the cellulose source can affect the thermal stability of nanocellulose. For example, the thermal stability of CNCs with neutral surface or lower sulphate moieties is higher than CNCs with a larger sulphate content (Xie et al. 2018a, 2018b). Furthermore, longer hydrolytic reaction periods may reduce the thermal stability of CNCs and subsequently lower the degree of crystallinity (Hamad 2017). The reduction of the amount of sulphate on sulphated CNCs and other physical or chemical modifications procedures may improve their thermal stability.

Surface chemistry of CNCs

The three hydroxyl groups which exist within the single glycosidic unit of the polymer chain of cellulose provide reactive sites for simple chemical modifications. The reactivity of CNC is considered to be felt less in the disordered cellulose region because most of the cellulose chains are hidden inside the crystalline planes. The hydroxyl groups in the 2nd and 3rd positions, bonded directly to alkyl groups on the anhydrous glucose units, experience a steric hindrance caused by the supramolecular structure of cellulose. The hydroxyl group in the sixth position, which is the primary alcohol, is attached to the single alkyl group on the glucose ring's side, and can thus react ten times faster than the other hydroxyl groups, especially in esterification reactions (Lizundia et al. 2016). Likewise, the OH–C2 group react twice as fast as the OH–C3 group in etherification reactions. Thus, the overall reactivity of cellulose depends on the interfibrillar bonds, interfibrillar interstices and the capillary structure of the cellulosic material, as well as other reaction conditions such as solvent type or reactant utilized (Lizundia et al. 2016). In addition to the many OH groups, CNCs also contain additional types of functional groups that are associated with a specific modification method, set of reaction conditions or reagents utilized. Sulphate groups (–OSO3–), carboxyl groups (–COO–) and acetyl groups (–COCH3) are the most popular functional groups, while the amino groups (–NH2), aldehyde groups (–CHO) and thiol groups (–SH) can be attached to CNCs via mild post-hydrolysis reactions (George & Sabapathi 2015; Tang 2016). The charge exhibited by CNCs is influenced by the type of functional groups on their surface. CNCs with sulphate or carboxylic functionality are negatively charged throughout a wide pH range (greater than pKa values), while CNCs with amino modifications are positively charged below the pKa values of the weak base. CNCs with quaternary ammonium functionality would also have a permanent positive charge (Rojas et al. 2015; Tang 2016).

Toxicity

Tests have been performed to determine the toxicity of CNCs concentrations and safety when consumed. Results obtained from these tests showed no obvious health associated with the use or ingestion of CNCs (Thompson et al. 2019). The co-toxicological tests performed with several marine species such as daphnia and rainbow trout showed that the toxicity and environmental risk levels of CNCs are very low. Furthermore, cytotoxicity (intracellular toxic effect) and the pro-inflammatory impact of CNCs are significantly lower than those for multi-walled carbon nanotubes (MWCNTs) and crocidolite asbestos fibres (CAFs). No known adverse health effects involving CNC-based products have been recorded, although the toxicity levels of these materials could be affected by production methodology, modifying agents and type of functionality imparted on the CNCs. Thus, safe/green chemicals should be considered during the synthesis of CNCs and toxicity evaluation must be regularly conducted (Rojas et al. 2015; Thompson et al. 2019).

In conclusion, the CNCs are more crystalline forms of nanocellulose due to the regular pattern of cellulose chain arrangement and strong inter-hydrogen linkage. CNCs have a large surface area with a high density of hydroxyl groups embedded in them. This provides more active sites for modification via the incorporation of diverse types of functional groups. CNCs possess a high aspect ratio, excellent mechanical properties, improved thermal stability, low toxicity levels and rheological properties that influence their forms in solution.

Importance of CNC as a coagulant for water treatment

CNCs can be obtained from plant biomaterials; hence, it is inexpensive, sustainable and naturally abundant. This significantly reduces the expense of water treatment when applied as a coagulant (Amran et al. 2018). CNCs are a safer alternative to synthetic chemicals used in water treatment. Unlike residual chemical coagulants, their non-toxic and biodegradable qualities render their deposit in water harmless to humans. The sludge generated from CNCs treatment is biodegradable, less hazardous and does not change the pH of the water being used (Shaharom 2019). The chemical modification of CNC is necessary if CNC is to be utilized as a coagulant. The chemical modification of pristine CNC refers to the addition of a chemical functionality to its surface, which enhances the material's interactions with its surrounding media without adversely affecting the surface properties (Shak et al. 2018). The dispersion of CNCs in non-polar solvents and polymeric matrices is difficult due to the hydrogen bonding which causes the nanoparticles to rapidly aggregate. Functionalization, therefore, facilitates the tuning of surface energy properties for improved compatibility when utilized in such hydrophobic media (George & Sabapathi 2015). Thus, molecules with electrostatic charge can be imparted onto the surface of CNCs, resulting in improved dispersion in solvent. Functionalization of CNCs also improves their coagulative properties for the removal of specific pollutants from water. More reactive sites for grafting of functional groups are formed on their surface due to an increase in the available hydroxyl groups. In addition, functionalizing CNCs is appealing because it allows for the formulation of advanced nanomaterial with novel or enhanced properties (Wang et al. 2016). The quantity of charged molecules on the surface of CNCs (i.e. charge density) influences the dispersibility of the individual crystals in solution. It also determines the strength of the bond formed between the CNCs and the new functional groups (Wang et al. 2016). The challenge encountered in the chemical modification of CNCs is about preserving the CNCs' original morphology during the modification process (George & Sabapathi 2015). Therefore, the conditions for CNCs modification must be kept mild during the functionalization process to avoid the destruction of the cellulose nanocrystal's original morphology.

Recent strategies for the modification of CNCs

Surface covalent modifications of CNCs can be divided into two groups: (1) covalent modification which includes polymer grafting strategy and substituting the hydroxyl groups on CNCs surface with other functional molecules via esterification, sylation, etherification, carboxylation, etc., and (2) non-covalent modification.

Covalent modification: functionalizing (substituting) surface hydroxyl groups with small molecules

Esterification

Esterification is a popular method for modifying nanocellulose because it significantly replaces the OH groups on the pristine CNCs. A unique characteristic of this strategy is the mild reaction conditions required which enable the displacement of OH groups during CNC modification without destroying the crystallinity of the CNC (Rojas et al. 2015; Huang et al. 2019). The hydroxyl groups on the cellulose surface are transformed into esters during the esterification process. Sulphation and phosphorylation are two other common esterification reactions that are used to add electrostatic functionalities to CNC in order to obtain more stable aqueous suspensions (Rojas et al. 2015; Wang et al. 2018). Acyl chlorides or anhydrides can also be used to introduce ester groups onto the nanocellulose surface. However, acid chloride esterification of nanocelluloses may undergo significant bulk modification, which may adversely reduce their crystallinity while providing a high degree of substitution. Acetylation of nanocellulose is a well-researched method (among various post-modification reactions) employed to incorporate alkyl molecules onto CNCs. It involves the use of carboxylic acid derivatives (e.g. acetic anhydride) in the presence of a catalyst such as perchloric acid, sulphuric acid or pyridine for modification (Hokkanen et al. 2016; Wang et al. 2018). The reaction between the anhydrides and hydroxyl groups of CNCs produces an ester that imparts new properties on its surface (Thompson et al. 2019). Succinic anhydride is an effective reagent for functionalizing CNCs because it allows the inclusion of aliphatic chains and carboxylic end groups. Additional solvents are not required because the acetic anhydride when used in sufficient amounts allows effective dispersion and mixing of the CNCs. Leszczyńska et al. (2019) studied the esterification process of CNCs using succinic anhydride. They investigated the effect of reaction parameters which include temperature, time, thermal properties and reagent molar ratio on the morphology, across a broad range of values via the X‐ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS), Fourier-transform infrared microscopy (FTIR), scanning electron microscopy (SEM)), wide-angle X-ray diffraction (WAXD) curve and thermogravimetric analysis (TGA). According to Leszczynska and his colleagues, CNCs with high surface quality and thermal stability was produced. They reported that the degree of modification increased as the reaction time and molar ratio of succinic anhydride to nanocellulose hydroxyl groups (SA:OH) increased.

Oxidation

The oxidation method has been used to produce carboxylated nanocellulose. This method is often used because it easily oxidizes C6–OH into a carboxyl group. The different oxidative methods that are now available are quite effective in producing carboxylated CNCs with charged groups. These include ammonium persulphate (APS) oxidation, citric/hydrochloric acid hydrolysis, nitric/hydrochloric acid hydrolysis, periodate chlorite oxidation and two-step radical oxidation of 2,2,6,6-tetramethylpiperidine-1-oxyl (TEMPO) (Takaichi & Isogai 2013; Batmaz et al. 2014; Yu et al. 2016a; Song et al. 2019). TEMPO-oxidation is a method that produces a high yield of carboxyl group. It consists of a combination of the TEMPO reagent, NaBr and NaClO for the modification process. The TEMPO-oxidation process is more often used because of its effectiveness and easy reaction mechanism. Batmaz et al. (2014) reported a two-step TEMPO-oxidation mechanism in conjunction with NaBr and NaOCl, which produced carboxylated CNCs with a higher carboxyl content of 2.1 mmol/g. They reported that the modified CNCs could remove cationic dyes with greater efficiency (769 mg dye/g CNC). Unfortunately, only the C6 position on the CNCs surface produces carboxylate groups by TEMPO radical oxidation, inhibiting further oxidation of the other OH groups (Song et al. 2019).

Etherification

Esterification is an effective functionalization process that typically employs an epoxylated molecule (modification agent) in conjunction with organic liquid and a heating device for etherification. The reaction between the epoxy group and the OH group on CNC results in the formation of an ether molecular bond and more OH groups at the β-position. However, polymerization is also likely to occur on the nanocellulose surface if the OH group produced continues to react with the epoxy groups (Lizundia et al. 2016). The polymerization reaction is highly undesirable as it tends to significantly reduce the efficiency of this process. Although polymerization cannot be completely eliminated, it can be partly overcome by adjusting the reaction conditions (Huang et al. 2019).

Amidation

The amidation method involves a mild and efficient modification process that utilizes biomolecules containing amine groups to functionalize the surface of nanocellulose. The reaction occurs during the conjugation of two molecules, each consisting of an amine and a carboxyl group. However, since these functionalities are absent on nanocellulose surface, they must be incorporated onto the nanocellulose surface via appropriate modification methods (e.g. TEMPO-oxidation) before amidation modification (Huang et al. 2019; Rana et al. 2021). The amidation process could be performed in aqueous solutions or organic solvents such as dimethylformamide (DMF). During the process, N-hydroxylsuccinimidyl (NHS) esters are formed, which activate the TEMPO-oxidized carboxylated nanocellulose in an aqueous reaction system. This activation increases the reaction between the carboxyl molecules of the nanocellulose and the generated amide groups. The second stage in the amidation process involves the combination of amide molecules and NHS-activated carboxylated nanocellulose, which are then conjugated to the nanocellulose surface through amide bonds (Huang et al. 2019). Le-Gars et al. (2020) investigated a two-step reaction path used in the grafting of 1-methyl-3-phenylpropylamine (1-M-3-PP) on CNCs. They first oxidized CNCs with 2,2,6,6-tetramethyl-1-piperidinyloxy (TEMPO) and then performed an amidation reaction in an aqueous medium under moderate conditions with N-(3-dimethylaminopropyl)-N′-ethylcarbodiimide (ECD)/N-hydroxysuccinimide (NHS) as a catalytic agent. A modified CNCs was obtained after an amidation reaction with 1-M-3-PP (CNC-1-M-3-PP).

Silane coupling reaction

Silane coupling reagents have been poorly explored for CNCs surface functionalization. The coupling reagents that have been studied involve the reaction between the ‘oxy’ group and the hydroxyl groups on the surface of the CNC. Alcohol is a by-product of this reaction. Silane reagents normally have linear chains, which is beneficial when attempting to decrease CNC's hydrophilic properties. These binding agents have the benefit of enabling more modification of the grafted nanocellulose chain based on the type of coupling agent used (Thompson et al. 2019). Various techniques and reagents have been investigated for the functionalizing procedure. Kargarzadeh et al. (2015) performed silane modification of CNCs by using N-(-aminoethyl)-amino propyltrimethoxy silane (APS). During the reaction, CNC was dispersed into a solution of ethanol, water and silane agent. The mixture was sonicated for a few minutes and then allowed to sediment for 2 h (after pH adjustment). This method is advantageous because it is a one-pot reaction that, except for sonication, requires no extra energy to efficiently spread the CNC in an ethanol/water solution.

Carbamation

Isocyanates are used in carbamate reaction to incorporate functional groups onto the surface of CNCs. The use of isocyanates for surface modification was investigated by Siqueira et al. (2010). They modified sisal-based CNCs using n-octadecyl isocyanate as a catalyst. The procedure for using isocyanates is similar to using a silane binding agent, where the hydroxyl group was the point of contact for the functionalization mechanism and reacts with the oxygen at the functional group's end. According to Siqueira and his colleagues, a urethane chain was formed and grafted onto the CNC's surface. Surface functionalization with isocyanate was investigated by Girouard et al. (2016). This was performed using isophorone di-isocyanate (IPDI). The CNC was dissolved in dimethyl sulphonate oxide (DMSO) and sonicated. The resulting solution was reacted with IPDI at 60 °C overnight in the presence of nitrogen and a catalyst. According to Girouard and colleagues, the modified CNC materials had better dispersion ability than pristine CNC, when immersed in a polyurethane matrice.

Cationic modification

Weak or highly charged ammonium-containing compounds, such as EPTMAC (2,3-epoxypropyl-trimethylammonium chloride), can be grafted onto the surfaces of CNCs because positive charges can be easily incorporated onto CNCs. Cationization of CNCs occurs by reacting OH groups of alkali pre-treated cellulose with the charged EPTMAC. Thus, well-dispersed aqueous CNCs suspensions are formed by the attachment of EPTMAC to the surface of CNCs by nucleophilic addition. The nanocrystal properties were preserved during modification while the grafting process caused a decrease in the overall surface charge density, with a reversal of the initial negative surface charge of CNCs to cations (Lizundia et al. 2016). However, due to the high viscosity of the solution, shear birefringence develops in the cationic-modified CNCs, preventing the formation of the chiral crystalline liquid phase. A cationic surfactant, hexadecyltrimethylammonium (HDTMA) bromide, was used by Kaboorani & Riedl (2015) to modify the surface of CNCs. The CNC was subjected to chemical and structural characterizations both before and after modification. Their research's findings demonstrated that new chemical groups (such as CH2, CH3 and quaternary ammonium groups) were incorporated onto the surface of the CNC as a result of the chemical interaction between CNC and HDTMA. According to Kaboorani and Riedl, the HDTMA transformed the CNC surface without affecting its reinforcing properties because no changes to its crystallite structure or size had occurred.

A summary of the common surface modification strategies used to functionalize CNCs is presented in Figure 8.
Figure 8

Schematic representation of strategies for nanocellulose modification (Tavakolian et al. 2020).

Figure 8

Schematic representation of strategies for nanocellulose modification (Tavakolian et al. 2020).

Close modal
Polymer grafting

Covalent polymer grafting on CNCs' surface has been accomplished via two popular methods: (1) the ‘graft onto’ method of surface functionalization with different coupling agents and (2) surface modification of polymers using the ‘grafting from’ technique which utilizes the ring-opening polymerization (ROP) mechanism, atom transfer radical polymerization (ATRP) and single-electron (SET-LP) for polymer surface functionalization (Habibi 2014; Thompson et al. 2019). The modification techniques earlier described (i.e. oxidation, esterification, amidation, acetylation, etc.) can also be incorporated in the polymers or oligomers grafting procedures for surface modification through the creation of new covalent bonds (Lizundia et al. 2016). The polymers to be grafted are typically lengthy chains with more hydroxyl groups compared with pristine CNCs' hydroxyl groups. The existence of these long chains and hydrogen bond linkage limits the reaction between the nanoparticles. The ‘grafting onto’ method involves using a binding agent to attach a target polymer to the hydroxyl group of the pre-synthesized cellulose polymer's surface. The ‘polymer grafting from’ approach focuses on the growth of polymer chains grafted ‘in-situ’ onto a nanocellulose surface (Habibi 2014; Thompson et al. 2019). The hydroxyl groups, which serve as active sites, will bind the new chains as it increases on the surface. A few example of the mechanisms utilized in the ‘grafting from’ method include ring-opening polymerization (ROP) and radically induced polymerization approaches such as the atom transfer radical polymerization (ATRP) (Yu et al. 2016a, 2016b; Wang et al. 2018). ROP is a polymerization method that can polymerize lactides, lactones, siloxanes, cyclic carbonates, ethers and other cyclic monomers under controlled reaction (Lizundia et al. 2016). A catalyst such as Tin (II)-ethylhexanoate (Sn(Oct)2) is widely utilized for the ring-open polymerization of monomers like caprolactone (CL), p-dioxanone and lactide (LA). Although ROP can be performed through a variety of procedures, the widely recognized mechanism for the activation of the process involves the transformation of Sn(Oct)2 to Sn alkoxide. The alkoxide is the specific initiator formed when Sn(Oct)2 react with alcoholic compound or protic compounds/impurities (i.e. the ‘coordination-insertion’ mechanism). The alcohol-to-monomer ratio can be altered to attain the desired molecular weight of the final polymer (Lizundia et al. 2016). The ATRP is a popular polymer grafting technique because it can undergo in-situ polymerization reaction. An example of the ATRP is the grafting of methyl methacrylate monomer (MMA) and butyl acrylate monomer (BA) onto CNCs to produce strong CNC-based thermoplastic elastomers (CTPEs) (Yu et al. 2016a, 2016b). An initiator must be bound to the pristine CNCs surface in the form of 2-bromoisobutylryl bromide for ATRP reaction to occur. The in-situ polymerization takes place between the surface-bound bromide groups and the MMA and BA in solution. The synthesized CTPEs produced had enhanced mechanical properties and better compatibility with CNCs because CNC could disperse better in it. Deng et al. (2015) investigated a graft copolymerization that involved dispersing CNCs in a mixture of ceric ammonium nitrate (CAN)/nitric acid solution into which MMA has been dissolved. The solution was left to copolymerize at 45 °C for 3 h. Deng and colleagues reported that the synthesized MCC-g-PMMA had better thermal and reinforcing ability than pristine MCC; when applied as reinforcement fillers in natural rubbers (NRs). They attributed the enhanced surface properties of MCC-g-PMMA to the structure formed between grafted PMMA and NR. Espino-pérez et al. (2016) in a related study investigated the modification of nanocrystals polysaccharides with polylactide, using ozonolysis-promoted free radical polymerization. Ozonolysis is the process that refers to the disintegration of unsaturated bonds present in organic chains by ozone to generate new reaction sites. An additional reagent may be added for subsequent modification. According to their findings, the CNC's thermal stability increased after modification. They discovered that the compatibility with the polylactide was improved by grafting and formed nanocomposites with improved water vapour resistant properties. Espino-Pérez and his co-workers further reported that the increased effectiveness of the grafting process would facilitate the reduction of hydrophilic properties of the polysaccharides.

Non-covalent surface modification (via surfactants)

Non-covalent surface functionalization of CNCs is accomplished when oppositely charged polyelectrolytes, polymer coating or adsorption mechanisms of surfactants are utilized for the modification of CNCs. The intermolecular reaction which occurs between the modifying agents and the CNCs are the hydrogen bonding, electrostatic attraction and van der Waals attractive force (Zakeri et al. 2018). Mariano et al. (2017) prepared CNC-reinforced poly(lactic acid) (PLA) nanocomposites via non-covalent modification of CNCs with two different poly(l-lactide) (PLLA)-based surfactants: poly ethylene glycol block (PEG-b-PLLA) and an imidazolium group (Im-PLLA), in order to improve the filler/matrix compatibility. According to their report, the diverse adsorption processes on the CNC surface led to distinct rheological and mechanical characteristics while the application of the synthesized PEG-b-PLLA and Im-PLLA to CNC-reinforced PLA nanocomposites significantly improved the dispersion of the nanoparticles. The positive charged Im-PLLA's appears to generate ionic interactions between the CNCs and the ionic liquid block. Similarly, Zakeri et al. (2018) researched the non-covalent surface modification of CNCs using polyethyleneimine (PEI). They made a PEI solution with de-ionized water and dropped it into the CNC suspensions while mechanically stirring them. From the findings, they discovered an alteration in the apparent size of the CNC and its surface potential and described the degree of modification as a function of the volume of PEI. They also reported that adding PEI to the CNC suspension resulted in the formation of aggregates and phase separation of the CNC particles.

In summary, surface functionalization of CNC is necessary where CNC is to be utilized as a coagulant for water purification CNCs modification improves their compatibility or suitability for the removal pollutants from water. Chemical modification of pristine CNC refers to the addition of a chemical functionality to its surface, which enhances the material's interactions with its surrounding media without adversely affecting the surface properties. The common modification strategies which involve the use of acids alkalis, and organic/inorganic compounds are oxidation, esterification, etherification, silane coupling reaction, carbamation, cationic modification, amidation and polymer grafting reactions among others.

The scientific community has shown great interest in the potentials of nanomaterials for wastewater treatment in recent decades. Research opportunities into the usage of micro and nanocellulose biopolymers have been made possible by the global market for ecologically friendly and sustainable natural resources such as cellulose (Ganesan et al. 2018; Marey 2019). Cellulose nanomaterials have been proven to have the potential to improve the efficiency and cleaning up of polluted water at a reduced cost. CNCs, an important derivative of cellulose, are important nanomaterial that has acquired an advantage over native cellulose fibres due to their unique properties (Vazquez et al. 2015; Xie et al. 2018b). Novel cellulose-based products have been employed as photocatalysts, adsorbents and flocculants in environmental remediation. However, the use of CNCs as coagulants for water purification is the main focus of this section.

Jiang et al. (2020) modified the surface of CNCs by grafting acryloyl oxy-ethyltrimethyl ammonium chloride (AETMAC) onto it with CAN as an initiator. The functionalized CNC (PAETMAC-g-CNC) was utilized as a coagulant for the removal of colour from dye solution (Reactive blue 19). PAETMAC-g-CNC was prepared by adding 10 mL of CAN and 50 mL of 20 g/L CNC suspension to a reactor being purged with nitrogen gas. Thereafter, a known amount of AETMAC was added to the mixture while the reaction proceeded in a nitrogen environment. According to Jiang and co-workers, the colour removal efficiency of the synthesized PAETMAC-g-CNC was over 80% at pH between 3 and 9 and a NaCl concentration of 60 g/L. They asserted that the high crystallinity and improved colloidal stability of the PAETMAC-g-CNCs and PAETMAC grafts greatly influenced the agglomeration of dye-containing flocs and accelerated their precipitation from the solution. It can be deduced from this study that PAETMAC-g-CNCs can decolourize RB-19 solutions within a short time, which is advantageous for industrial applications. Campano et al. (2019) in a related study investigated the flocculation performance of hairy cationic nanocrystalline cellulose (CNCC) in a kaolinite model suspension. CNCC is a new kind of cylindrical-shaped crystalline nanocellulose with functionalized amorphous chains on both ends. The CNCC was prepared in stages. First, dialdehyde-modified cellulose (DAMC) was produced by oxidizing 20 g of pulp with 19.6 g of NaIO4 and 15.6 g of NaCl at room temperature for 24 h. Next, the DAMC was processed using a solution of 1 g of GT [(2-hydrazinyl-2-oxoethyl)-trimethylazanium chloride, GT] and 2.4 g of NaCl per gram of DAMC for 24 h to produce cationic DAMC. In order to obtain the CNCC, the non-fibrillated fraction of the DAMC was removed after being sonicated and centrifuged at 5,000 rpm for 10 min. The result from this study showed that the CNCC is highly efficient in achieving clay particle aggregation, with immense flocculation efficacy over a broad range of 7.5–75 mg/g CNCC dosage.

Morantes et al. (2019) synthesized a novel water treatment flocculant via the cationic modification of CNCs with the quaternary compound 3-chloro-2-hydroxypropyltrimethylammonium chloride (CHPTAC). Coagulation studies were performed to determine the ability of the synthesized coagulant to flocculate silica (SiO2) suspension. During the preparation, NaOH solution was added to a CNC dispersion (2 wt%) to obtain a 2 M CNC concentration and thereafter, the solution was stirred at room temperature for 30 min. Next, various amounts of CHPTAC (6, 9 or 12) were added and the mixture was stirred at 25 °C for different periods (4, 8 or 24 h). The resultant cellulose nanocrystals-epoxypropyl trimethyl ammonium (CNC-EPTMAC) was thereafter washed and dried. According to Morantes and co-workers, the CNC-EPTMAC demonstrated a high flocculant performance for water treatment, by lowering turbidity by about 99.7%, at a concentration of only 2 ppm. Similarly, Song et al. (2019) in their research used an easy multibranch technique to functionalize CNC via sequential grafting of ascorbic and citric acid. They further investigated the coagulation/flocculation performance of the modified CNCs for the removal of turbidity from kaolin suspension. Briefly, CNC (3 g) was functionalized with 9 g of ascorbic acid by condensation polymerization with 6 M HCl as a catalyst, while being stirred mechanically (750 rpm) for 4 h at 80 °C. After that, the CNC-g-AA (3 g) was reacted with citric acid in a graft polymerization process with HCl (6 M) as a catalyst, under the same reacting conditions to produce CNC-g-AA-g-CA. Song and his colleagues reported that the synthesized CNC-g-AA-g-A could be used as excellent flocculants as a turbidity removal of 91.07% was recorded. In another study, Sheikhi et al. (2015) prepared electrosterically stabilized nanocrystalline cellulose (ENCC) by oxidizing wood pulp with periodate (NaIO4) and chlorite (NaClO2) reagents. Afterwards, the flocculation capabilities of the ENCC for the removal of copper ions from simulated water was investigated. During the process, 1 g of softwood pulp was initially oxidized by 1.33 g of NaIO4 for 96 h in 66 mL of water in a beaker enclosed in aluminium foil. Then, 1 g of the periodate-oxidized pulp was oxidized overnight by a solution of 1.14 g of NaClO2, 1.41 g of H2O2 and 2.93 g of NaCl at a pH of 5. Sheiki and colleagues observed that the ENCC could aggregate significant concentrations of copper ions and had a copper removal capacity of 185 mg/g. From this study, it can be deduced that ENCC is a viable option for the removal of heavy metals from wastewater. Furthermore, the highly charged dicarboxylated cellulose (DCC) polyanion chains that protrude from ENCC were believed to be responsible for the high removal efficiency.

The modified CNCs are materials of high potentials in water treatment technology. Their excellent flocculation performance could be attributed to the unique properties of the modified CNCs surface morphology, such as the increased carboxyl contents, the presence of new surface charges and functional groups, the high crystallinity and improved colloidal stability among others. The utilization of CNCs for the production of CNC-based coagulants eliminates the environmental issues associated with the use of inorganic and organic flocculants made from toxic and non-biodegradable synthetic polymers. A summary of the application of CNCs-based flocculants for water treatment is presented in Table 1.

Table 1

Performance of cellulose-based flocculants in wastewater treatment (Shak et al. 2018)

FlocculantPollutant matriceAn Analytical testMax removal (%)
Anionic-sodium carboxymethyl cellulose Natural surface water Turbidity 93 
Anionic dicarboxylic acid nanocellulose Municipal wastewater Turbidity 80 
COD 60 
Crystalline nanocellulose grafted with cationic pyridineium functional groups Freshwater microalgae Microalgae 95 
Biomass 
Nanofibrillated into cationic nanocellulose Activated sludge Turbidity 90 
COD 60 
Cationic-dialdehyde cellulosic nanofibrills Kaolin wastewater Colloid aggregation 95 
Anionic-sulphonated nanocellulose Municipal wastewater Turbidity 80 
COD 60 
Hydroxypropyl methyl cellulose grafted with polyacrylamide Mine wastewater Turbidity 94 
Cationic pyridinium CNCs Microalgal biomass Flocculation efficiency 100 
Cationic-cellulose nanofibrills Municipal activated sludge Turbidity 90 
COD 20–70 
Anionic carboxylated CNCs Kaolin suspension Turbidity 80.9 
Rod-shaped CNCs Flocculation and phase
Separation of bacteria 
Aggregation percentage 100 
Poly(N,N-dimethyl acrylamide) and poly acrylamide-grafted cellulose Kaolin suspension Turbidity 69–91 
FlocculantPollutant matriceAn Analytical testMax removal (%)
Anionic-sodium carboxymethyl cellulose Natural surface water Turbidity 93 
Anionic dicarboxylic acid nanocellulose Municipal wastewater Turbidity 80 
COD 60 
Crystalline nanocellulose grafted with cationic pyridineium functional groups Freshwater microalgae Microalgae 95 
Biomass 
Nanofibrillated into cationic nanocellulose Activated sludge Turbidity 90 
COD 60 
Cationic-dialdehyde cellulosic nanofibrills Kaolin wastewater Colloid aggregation 95 
Anionic-sulphonated nanocellulose Municipal wastewater Turbidity 80 
COD 60 
Hydroxypropyl methyl cellulose grafted with polyacrylamide Mine wastewater Turbidity 94 
Cationic pyridinium CNCs Microalgal biomass Flocculation efficiency 100 
Cationic-cellulose nanofibrills Municipal activated sludge Turbidity 90 
COD 20–70 
Anionic carboxylated CNCs Kaolin suspension Turbidity 80.9 
Rod-shaped CNCs Flocculation and phase
Separation of bacteria 
Aggregation percentage 100 
Poly(N,N-dimethyl acrylamide) and poly acrylamide-grafted cellulose Kaolin suspension Turbidity 69–91 

This article summarizes the most recent developments in the extraction, modification and application of functionalized CNCs in wastewater treatment. The high demand for cleaner water supplies has prompted scientists to develop effective polymer flocculants made from CNCs. The CNC-based coagulants are safer for use than chemical coagulants due to their non-toxic and biodegradable characteristics. Surface functionalization of CNC may be required in order to improve their surface characteristics and performance as coagulants in water purification. Esterification, etherification, carbamation, amidation, silylation and grafting are some of the common strategies utilized for the surface modification of CNCs. Because cellulose can be extracted from plant biomass, it is possible to produce CNCs that are affordable, sustainable and easily accessible for a variety of industrial applications. Numerous massive manufacturing facilities to extract pure CNCs are in operation all around the world. Some of the facilities (and their daily production capacity) include: Holmen (Sweden): 100 kg/day; Celluforce (Canada): 1,000 kg/day; Alberta Innovates (20 kg/day); American Process (USA): 500 kg/day; US Forest Products Lab (10 kg/day); Indian Council for Agriculture Research (20 kg/day) and Blue Goose Biorefineries (20 kg/day). The synthesis of CNC-based coagulants from CNC is an area that is emerging and currently being explored in the scientific community. The results from the potential application of modified CNCs coagulants, as shown in this article, confirms their remarkable coagulation efficiency for the treatment of turbid and dye-contaminated water. Their extraordinary performance could be attributed to the functional moieties grafted to their surface during modification, along with the interplay of other coagulation mechanisms. Therefore, more research into the development of CNC-based coagulants should be encouraged globally. However, most of the investigations on the production and application of CNC-based coagulants are performed on a laboratory scale and upscaling could be very expensive. Therefore, there is a need for more research on the long-term viability and practicality of large-scale CNCs coagulant-based treatment systems.

Both authors contributed to the study concept. The first author wrote the original draft of the manuscript while the second author reviewed and edited the manuscript.

All relevant data are included in the paper or its Supplementary Information.

The authors declare there is no conflict.

Abdullah
N. A.
,
Saiful
M.
,
Rani
A.
,
Mohammad
M.
,
Sainorudin
M. H.
,
Asim
N.
,
Yaakob
Z.
,
Razali
H.
&
Emdadi
Z.
2021
Nanocellulose from agricultural waste as an emerging nanotechnology material for nanotechnology applications – an overview
.
Polimery
3
(
3
), 155–214.
Alatawi
F. S.
,
Monier
M.
&
Elsayed
N. H.
2018
Amino functionalization of carboxymethyl cellulose for efficient immobilization of urease
.
International Journal of Biological Macromolecules
114
,
1018
1025
.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2018.03.142
.
Al-hashimi
O.
,
Hashim
K.
,
Loffill
E.
,
Nakouti
I.
&
Faisal
A. A. H.
2023
Kinetic and equilibrium isotherm studies for the removal of tetracycline from aqueous solution using engineered sand modified with calcium ferric oxides
.
Environments
10
(
7
),
1
20
.
Alwi
H.
,
Idris
J.
,
Musa
M.
&
Ku Hamid
K. H.
2013
A preliminary study of banana stem juice as a plant-based coagulant for treatment of spent coolant wastewater
.
Journal of Chemistry
2013
.
https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/165057.
Amran
A. H.
,
Zaidi
N. S.
,
Muda
K.
&
Loan
L. W.
2018
Effectiveness of natural coagulant in coagulation process: a review
.
International Journal of Engineering and Technology (UAE)
7
(
3
),
34
37
.
https://doi.org/10.14419/ijet.v7i3.9.15269
.
Baheti
V.
,
Abbasi
R.
&
Militky
J.
2013
Optimisation of ball milling parameters for refinement of waste jute fibres to nano/micro scale in dry conditions
.
Journal of Textile Engineering
59
(
5
),
87
92
.
https://doi.org/10.4188/jte.59.87
.
Batmaz
R.
,
Mohammed
N.
,
Berry
R. M.
&
Tam
K. C.
2014
Cellulose nanocrystals as promising adsorbents for the removal of cationic dyes
.
Cellulose
21
,
1655
1665
.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-014-0168-8
.
Bee
S.
,
Hamid
A.
,
Khadijah
S.
,
Das
R.
&
Centi
G.
2016
Synergic effect of tungstophosphoric acid and sonication for rapid synthesis of crystalline nanocellulose
.
Carbohydrate Polymers
138
,
349
355
.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2015.10.023
.
Börjesson
M.
&
Westman
G.
2015
Crystalline nanocellulose – preparation, modification, and properties
.
IntechOpen
32
,
137
144
.
Available from: http://www.intechopen.com/books/trends-in-telecommunications-technologies/gps-total-electron-content-tec- prediction-at-ionosphere-layer-over-the-equatorial-region%0AInTec
Campano
C.
,
Balea
A.
,
Blanco
A.
&
Negro
C.
2016
Enhancement of the fermentation process and properties of bacterial cellulose: a review
.
Cellulose
23
(
1
),
57
91
.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-015-0802-0
.
Campano
C.
,
Lopez-Exposito
P.
,
Blanco
A.
,
Negro
C.
&
van de Ven
T. G. M.
2019
Hairy cationic nanocrystalline cellulose as a novel flocculant of clay
.
Journal of Colloid and Interface Science
545
,
153
161
.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcis.2019.02.097
.
Chirayil
C. J.
,
Mathew
L.
&
Thomas
S.
2014
Review of recent research in nano cellulose preparation from different lignocellulosic fibers
.
Reviews on Advanced Materials Science
37
(
1–2
),
20
28
.
Choy
S. Y.
,
Prasad
K. M. N.
,
Wu
T. Y.
&
Ramanan
R. N.
2015
A review on common vegetables and legumes as promising plant-based natural coagulants in water clarification
.
International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology
12
,
367
390
.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s13762-013-0446-2
.
Dayarathne
H. N. P.
,
Angove
M. J.
,
Aryal
R.
,
Abuel-naga
H.
&
Mainali
B.
2021
Removal of natural organic matter from source water: review on coagulants, dual coagulation, alternative coagulants, and mechanisms
.
Journal of Water Process Engineering
40
,
101820
.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwpe.2020.101820
.
Deng
F.
,
Ge
X.
,
Zhang
Y.
,
Li
M.
&
Cho
U. R.
2015
Synthesis and characterization of microcrystalline cellulose-graft-poly (methyl methacrylate) copolymers and their application as rubber reinforcements
.
Journal of Applied Polymer Science
42666
,
1
10
.
https://doi.org/10.1002/app.42666
.
Espino-pérez
E.
,
Gilbert
R. G.
,
Domenek
S.
&
Brochier-salon
M. C.
2016
Nanocomposites with functionalised polysaccharide nanocrystals through aqueous free radical polymerisation promoted by ozonolysis
.
Carbohydrate Polymers
135
,
256
266
.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2015.09.005
.
Fard
A. K.
,
Rhadfi
T.
,
Mckay
G.
,
Al-marri
M.
,
Abdala
A.
,
Hilal
N.
&
Hussien
M. A.
2016
Enhancing oil removal from water using ferric oxide nanoparticles doped carbon nanotubes adsorbents
.
Chemical Engineering Journal
293
,
90
101
.
Ganesan
K.
,
Budtova
T.
,
Ratke
L.
,
Gurikov
P.
,
Baudron
V.
,
Preibisch
I.
,
Niemeyer
P.
,
Smirnova
I.
&
Milow
B.
2018
Review on the production of polysaccharide aerogel particles
.
Materials
11
(
11
),
1
37
.
https://doi.org/10.3390/ma11112144
.
Gautam
S.
&
Saini
G.
2020
Use of natural coagulants for industrial wastewater treatment
.
Global Journal of Environmental Science and Management
6
(
4
),
553
578
.
https://doi.org/10.22034/gjesm.2020.04.10
.
George
J.
&
Sabapathi
S. N.
2015
Cellulose nanocrystals: synthesis, functional properties, and applications
.
Nanotechnology, Science and Applications
8
,
45
54
.
https://doi.org/10.2147/NSA.S64386
.
Girouard
N. M.
,
Xu
S.
,
Schueneman
G. T.
,
Shofner
M. L.
&
Meredith
J. C.
2016
Site-selective modification of cellulose nanocrystals with isophorone diisocyanate and formation of polyurethane-CNC composites
.
ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces
8
,
1458
1467
.
https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.5b10723
.
Gopakumar
D. A.
2018
Nanocellulose Based Functional Constructs for Clean Water and Microwave Suppression
.
Materials
,
Université de Bretagne Sud; Mahatma Gandhi University
.
Habibi
Y.
2014
Key advances in the chemical modification of nanocelluloses
.
Chemical Society Reviews
43
,
1519
1542
.
https://doi.org/10.1039/c3cs60204d
.
Hamad
W. Y.
2017
Cellulose Nanocrystals: Properties, Production and Applications
.
John Wiley & Sons, Chichester, UK
.
He
B.
2015
Agricultural Economic Loss of Water Pollution in China
.
Zhejiang Gongshang Universuty
.
Hokkanen
S.
,
Bhatnagar
A.
&
Sillanpää
M.
2016
A review on modification methods to cellulose-based adsorbents to improve adsorption capacity
.
Water Research
91
,
156
173
.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2016.01.008
.
Hua
K.
,
Strømme
M.
&
Mihranyan
A.
2015
Nanocellulose from green algae modulates the in vitro inflammatory response of monocytes/macrophages
.
Cellulose
22
(
6
),
3673
3688
.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-015-0772-2
.
Huang
J.
,
Ma
X.
,
Yang
G.
&
Alain
D.
2019
Introduction to nanocellulose
. In:
Nanocellulose: From Fundamentals to Advanced Materials
, pp.
1
20
.
https://doi.org/10.1002/9783527807437.ch1
Huber
T.
,
Müssig
J.
,
Curnow
O.
,
Pang
S.
,
Bickerton
S.
&
Staiger
M. P.
2012
A critical review of all-cellulose composites
.
Journal of Materials Science
47
(
3
),
1171
1186
.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-011-5774-3
.
Jalal
G.
,
Abbas
N.
,
Deeba
F.
,
Butt
T.
,
Jilal
S.
&
Sarfraz
S.
2021
Efficient removal of dyes in textile effluents using aluminum-based coagulant
.
Chemistry International
7
(
3
),
197
207
.
Jiang
X.
,
Lou
C.
,
Hua
F.
,
Deng
H.
&
Tian
X.
2020
Cellulose nanocrystals-based flocculants for high-speed and high-efficiency decolorization of colored effluents
.
Journal of Cleaner Production
251
,
119749
.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.119749
.
Jonoobi
M.
,
Oladi
R.
&
Davoudpour
Y.
2015
Different preparation methods and properties of nanostructured cellulose from various natural resources and residues: a review
.
Cellulose
22
,
935
969
.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-015-0551-0
.
Joseph
B.
,
Sagarika
V. K.
,
Sabu
C.
,
Kalarikkal
N.
&
Thomas
S.
2020
Cellulose nanocomposites: fabrication and biomedical applications
.
Journal of Bioresources and Bioproducts
5
(
4
),
223
237
.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobab.2020.10.001
.
Kaboorani
A.
&
Riedl
B.
2015
Surface modification of cellulose nanocrystals (CNC) by a cationic surfactant
.
Industrial Crops & Products
65
,
45
55
.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2014.11.027
.
Kang
X.
,
Kuga
S.
,
Wang
L.
,
Wu
M.
&
Huang
Y.
2016
Dissociation of intra/inter-molecular hydrogen bonds of cellulose molecules in the dissolution process: a mini review
.
Journal of Bioresources and Bioproducts
1
(
1
),
58
63
.
Kargarzadeh
H.
,
Sheltami
R. M.
,
Ahmad
I.
,
Abdullah
I.
&
Dufresne
A.
2015
Cellulose nanocrystal: a promising toughening agent for unsaturated polyester nanocomposite
.
Polymer
56
,
346
357
.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymer.2014.11.054
.
Kargarzadeh
H.
,
Ioelovich
M.
,
Ahmad
I.
,
Thomas
S.
&
Dufresne
A.
2017
Methods for extraction of nanocellulose from various sources
. In:
Handbook of Nanocellulose and Cellulose Nanocomposites
, pp.
1
49
.
https://doi.org/10.1002/9783527689972.ch1
Kargarzadeh
H.
,
Mariano
M.
,
Gopakumar
D.
,
Ahmad
I.
,
Thomas
S.
,
Dufresne
A.
,
Huang
J.
&
Lin
N.
2018
Advances in cellulose nanomaterials
.
Cellulose
25
(
4
),
2151
2189
.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-018-1723-5
.
Kiew
P. L.
&
Chong
K. H.
2017
Development of fruit-based waste material as bioflocculant for water clarification
.
Journal of Mechanical Engineering, SI
4
(
5
),
1
10
.
Kontturi
E.
,
Meriluoto
A.
&
Nuopponen
M.
2011
Process for preparing micro- and nanocrystalline cellulose. Patentti WO2011/114005
.
Kurniawan
S. B.
,
Rozaimah
S.
,
Abdullah
S.
&
Imron
M. F.
2020
Challenges and opportunities of biocoagulant/bioflocculant application for drinking water and wastewater treatment and its potential for sludge recovery
.
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
17
,
9312
.
1–33
.
Larissa
L. A.
,
Fonsêca
A. F.
,
Pereira
F. V.
&
Druzian
J. I.
2015
Extraction and characterization of cellulose nanocrystals from corn stover
.
Cellulose Chemistry and Technology
49
(
2
),
127
133
.
Le-Gars
M.
,
Delvart
A.
,
Roger
P.
,
Belgacem
M. N.
&
Bras
J.
2020
Amidation of TEMPO-oxidized cellulose nanocrystals using aromatic aminated molecules
.
Colloid and Polymer Science
298
,
603
617
.
Leszczyńska
A.
,
Radzik
P.
,
Szefer
E.
,
Mičušík
M.
,
Omastová
M.
&
Pielichowski
K.
2019
Surface modification of cellulose nanocrystals with succinic anhydride
.
Polymers
11
(
5
).
https://doi.org/10.3390/polym11050866
Lindman
B.
,
Medronho
B.
,
Alves
L.
,
Costa
C.
,
Edlund
H.
&
Norgren
M.
2017
The relevance of structural features of cellulose and its interactions to dissolution, regeneration, gelation and plasticization phenomena
.
Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics
19
(
35
),
23704
23718
.
https://doi.org/10.1039/c7cp02409f
.
Liu
Y.
,
Wang
H.
,
Yu
G.
,
Yu
Q.
,
Li
B.
&
Mu
X.
2014
A novel approach for the preparation of nanocrystalline cellulose by using phosphotungstic acid
.
Carbohydrate Polymers
110
,
415
422
.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2014.04.040
.
Lizundia
E.
,
Meaurio
E.
&
Vilas
J. L.
2016
Grafting of cellulose nanocrystals
. In:
Multifunctional Polymeric Nanocomposites Based on Cellulosic Reinforcements (Issue May 2017)
.
Elsevier Inc
, pp.
61
113
.
https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-323-44248-0.00003-1.
Maćczak
P.
,
Kaczmarek
H.
&
Ziegler-Borowska
M.
2020
Recent achievements in polymer bio-based flocculants for water treatment
.
Materials
13
(
18
),
3951
.
https://doi.org/10.3390/ma13183951
.
Marey
A. M.
2019
Effectiveness of chitosan as natural coagulant in treating turbid waters
.
Revista Bionatura
4
(
2
),
856
860
.
https://doi.org/10.21931/RB/2019.04.02.7
.
Mariano, M., Pilate, F., Khelifa, F., Dubois, P., Raquez, J. & Dufresne, A. 2017. Preparation of Cellulose Nanocrystal-Reinforced Poly ( lactic acid ) Nanocomposites through Noncovalent Modifi cation with PLLA- Based Surfactants. ACS Omega, 2, 2678–2688. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.7b00387
.
Mathew
A. P.
,
Oksman
K.
,
Karim
Z.
,
Liu
P.
,
Khan
S. A.
&
Naseri
N.
2014
Process scale up and characterization of wood cellulose nanocrystals hydrolysed using bioethanol pilot plant
.
Industrial Crops and Products
58
,
212
219
.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2014.04.035
.
Mathuram
M.
,
Meera
R.
&
Vijayaraghavan
G.
2018
Application of locally sourced plants as natural coagulants for dye removal from wastewater: a review
.
Journal of Materials and Environmental Sciences
2508
(
7
),
2058
2070
.
Moon
R. J.
,
Martini
A.
,
Nairn
J.
,
Simonsen
J.
&
Youngblood
J.
2011
Cellulose nanomaterials review: structure, properties and nanocomposites
.
Chemical Society Reviews
40
(
7
),
3941
3994
.
https://doi.org/10.1039/c0cs00108b
.
Morantes
D.
,
Muñoz
E.
,
Kam
D.
&
Shoseyov
O.
2019
Highly charged cellulose nanocrystals applied as a water treatment flocculant
.
Nanomaterials
9
(
2
),
1
13
.
https://doi.org/10.3390/nano9020272
.
Muruganandam
L.
,
Kumar
M. P. S.
,
Jena
A.
,
Gulla
S.
&
Godhwani
B.
2017
Treatment of waste water by coagulation and flocculation using biomaterials
.
IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering
263
(
3
),
032006
.
https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/263/3/032006
.
Nandini
G. K. M.
&
Sheba
M. C.
2016
Emanating trends in the usage of bio-coagulants in potable water treatment: a review
.
International Research Journal of Engineering and Technology
3
(
11
),
970
974
.
Noori
R.
,
Berndtsson
R.
,
Hosseinzadeh
M.
,
Adamowski
J. F.
&
Abyaneh
M. R.
2019
A critical review on the application of the National Sanitation Foundation Water Quality Index
.
Environmental Pollution
244
,
575
587
.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2018.10.076
.
Oelofse
S.
,
Schoonraad
J.
&
Baldwin
D.
2016
Impacts on waste planning and management
. In:
Shale Gas Development in the Central Karoo: A Scientific Assessment of the Opportunities and Risks
, pp.
1
45
.
Oladoja
N. A.
,
Unuabonah
E.
,
Amuda
O. S.
&
Kolawole
O. M.
2017
Polysaccharides as a Green and Sustainable Resources for Water and Wastewater Treatment
.
Springer, Cham, Switzerland
.
Omar
M. A. B.
,
Mohd-Zin
N. S. B.
&
Mohd-Salleh
S. N.
2018
A review on performance of chemical, natural and composite coagulant
.
International Journal of Engineering and Technology(UAE)
7
(
3.23 Special Issue 23
),
56
60
.
Othmani
A.
,
Kadier
A.
,
Singh
R.
,
Adaobi
C.
,
Bouzid
M.
,
Aquatar
O.
,
Ahmad
W.
&
Ebba
M.
2022
A comprehensive review on green perspectives of electrocoagulation integrated with advanced processes for effective pollutants removal from water environment
.
Environmental Research
215
,
114294
.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2022.114294
.
Oyegbile
B.
,
Ay
P.
&
Narra
S.
2016
Flocculation kinetics and hydrodynamic interactions in natural and engineered flow systems: a review
.
Environmental Engineering Research
21
(
1
),
1
14
.
Parmar
K. A.
,
Prajapati
S.
,
Patel
R.
&
Dabhi
Y.
2011
Effective use of ferrous sulfate and alum as a coagulant in the treatment of dairy industrial wastewater
.
ARPN Journal of Engineering and Applied Sciences
6
(
9
),
42
45
.
Phanthong
P.
,
Reubroycharoen
P.
,
Hao
X.
&
Xu
G.
2018
Nanocellulose: extraction and application
.
Carbon Resources Conversion
1
(
1
),
32
43
.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crcon.2018.05.004
.
Rana
A. K.
,
Frollini
E.
&
Thakur
V. K.
2021
Cellulose nanocrystals: pretreatments, preparation strategies, and surface functionalization
.
International Journal of Biological Macromolecules
182
,
1554
1581
.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2021.05.119
.
Ravindran
L.
,
Sreekala
M. S.
&
Thomas
S.
2019
Novel processing parameters for the extraction of cellulose nanofibres (CNF) from environmentally benign pineapple leaf fibres (PALF): structure-property relationships
.
International Journal of Biological Macromolecules
131
,
858
870
.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2019.03.1
.
Rojas
J.
,
Bedoya
M.
&
Cho
Y.
2015
Current trends in the production of cellulose nanoparticles and nanocomposites for biomedical applications
. In:
Cellulose-Fundamental Aspects and Current Trends
, Vol.
32
.
IntechOpen
, pp.
193
228
.
Sahu
O.
&
Chaudhari
P.
2013
Review on chemical treatment of industrial waste water
.
Journal of Applied Sciences and Environmental Management
17
(
2
),
241
257
.
https://doi.org/10.4314/jasem.v17i2.8
.
Shaharom
M. S.
2019
Potential of orange peel as a coagulant
.
Infrastructure University Kuala Lumpur Research Journal
7
(
1
),
63
72
.
Shak
K. P. Y.
,
Pang
Y. L.
&
Mah
S. K.
2018
Nanocellulose: recent advances and its prospects in environmental remediation
.
Beilstein Journal of Nanotechnology
9
(
1
),
2479
2498
.
https://doi.org/10.3762/bjnano.9.232
.
Sharma
A.
,
Thakur
M.
,
Bhattacharya
M.
,
Mandal
T.
&
Goswami
S.
2019
Commercial application of cellulose nano-composites – a review
.
Biotechnology Reports
21
(
2018
),
e00316
.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.btre.2019.e00316
.
Sheikhi
A.
,
Safari
S.
&
Yang
H.
2015
Copper removal using electrosterically stabilized nanocrystalline cellulose
.
Applied Materials & Interfaces
7
,
11301
11308
.
https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.5b01619
.
Shen
R.
,
Xue
S.
,
Xu
Y.
,
Liu
Q.
,
Feng
Z.
,
Ren
H.
,
Zhai
H.
&
Kong
F.
2020
Research progress and development demand of nanocellulose reinforced polymer composites
.
Polymers
12
(
9
),
1
19
.
https://doi.org/10.3390/POLYM12092113
.
Sinha
A.
,
Martin
E. M.
,
Lim
K.-T.
,
Carrier
D. J.
,
Han
H.
,
Zharov
V. P.
&
Kim
J.-W.
2015
Cellulose nanocrystals as advanced ‘green’ materials for biological and biomedical engineering
.
Journal of Biosystems Engineering
40
(
4
),
373
393
.
https://doi.org/10.5307/jbe.2015.40.4.373
.
Siqueira
G.
,
Bras
J.
,
Dufresne
A.
,
Papeterie
D.
&
Martin
F.-S.
2010
New process of chemical grafting of cellulose nanoparticles with a long chain isocyanate
.
Langmuir
26
(
15
),
402
411
.
https://doi.org/10.1021/la9028595
.
Song
M.
,
Yu
H.
,
Chen
L.
,
Zhu
J.
,
Wang
Y.
&
Yao
J.
2019
Multibranch strategy to decorate carboxyl groups on cellulose nanocrystals to prepare adsorbent/flocculants and pickering emulsions
.
ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering Scheme
7
,
6969
6980
.
https://doi.org/10.1021/acssuschemeng.8b06671
.
Sunasee
R.
&
Hemraz
U. D.
2018
Synthetic strategies for the fabrication of cationic surface-modified cellulose nanocrystals
.
Fibers
6
(
1
),
1
19
.
https://doi.org/10.3390/FIB6010015
.
Takaichi
S.
&
Isogai
A.
2013
Oxidation of wood cellulose using 2-azaadamantane N-oxyl (AZADO) or 1-methyl-AZADO catalyst in NaBr/NaClO system
.
Cellulose
20
(
4
),
1979
1988
.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-013-9932-4
.
Tang
J.
2016
Functionalized Cellulose Nanocrystals (CNC) for Advanced Applications
.
Thesis
,
University of Waterloo
.
Tavakolian
M.
,
Jafari
S. M.
&
van de Ven
T. G. M.
2020
A review on surface-functionalized cellulosic nanostructures as biocompatible antibacterial materials
.
Nano-Micro Letters
12
(
1
),
1
23
.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s40820-020-0408-4
.
Teh
C. Y.
,
Budiman
P. M.
,
Pui
K.
,
Shak
Y.
&
Wu
T. Y.
2016
Recent advancement of coagulation − flocculation and its application in wastewater treatment
.
Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research
55
,
4363
4389
.
https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.iecr.5b04703
.
Thompson
L.
,
Azadmanjiri
J.
,
Nikzad
M.
,
Sbarski
I.
,
Wang
J.
&
Yu
A.
2019
Cellulose nanocrystals: production, functionalization and advanced applications
.
Reviews on Advanced Materials Science
58
(
1
),
1
16
.
https://doi.org/10.1515/rams-2019-0001
.
Trache
D.
2018
Nanocellulose as a promising sustainable material for biomedical applications
.
AIMS Materials Science
5
(
2
),
201
205
.
https://doi.org/10.3934/matersci.2018.2.201
.
Trache
D.
,
Hussin
M. H.
,
Haafiz
M. K. M.
&
Thakur
V. K.
2017
Recent progress in cellulose nanocrystals: sources and production
.
Nanoscale
9
(
5
),
1763
1786
.
Ukiwe
L. N.
,
Ibeneme
S. L.
,
Duru
C. E.
,
Okolue
B. N.
,
Onyedika
G.
&
Nweze
C. A.
2014
Chemical and electro-coagulation techniques in coagulation-floccculation in water and wastewater treatment - a review
.
IJRRAS
18
(
3
),
285
294
.
https://doi.org/10.24297/jac.v9i3.1006
.
Vazquez
A.
,
Foresti
M. L.
,
Moran
J. I.
&
Cyras
V. P.
2015
Extraction and production of cellulose nanofibers
.
In Pandey, J., Takagi, H., Nakagaito, A., Kim (Ed.), Handbook of polymer nanocomposites. Processing, performance and application (pp. 81–118). Springer, Berlin Heidelberg
.
Wang
B.
,
Dong
F.
,
Chen
M.
,
Zhu
J.
,
Tan
J.
,
Fu
X.
,
Wang
Y.
&
Chen
S.
2016
Advances in recycling and utilization of agricultural wastes in China: based on environmental risk, crucial pathways, influencing factors, policy mechanism
.
Procedia Environmental Sciences
31
,
12
17
.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proenv.2016.02.002
.
Wang
Y.
,
Wang
X.
,
Xie
Y.
&
Zhang
K.
2018
Functional nanomaterials through esterification of cellulose: a review of chemistry and application
.
Cellulose
25
(
7
),
3703
3731
.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-018-1830-3
.
Wei
H.
,
Gao
B.
,
Ren
J.
,
Li
A.
&
Yang
H.
2018
Coagulation/flocculation in dewatering of sludge: a review
.
Water Research
143
(
2015
),
608
631
.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2018.07.029
.
Wiesmann
U.
,
Choi
I. S.
&
Dombrowski
E.-M.
2007
Fundamentals of Biological WasteWater Treatment
.
WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim
.
Wohlert
M.
,
Benselfelt
T.
,
Wa
L.
,
Berglund
L. A.
&
Wohlert
J.
2022
Cellulose and the role of hydrogen bonds: not in charge of everything
.
Cellulose
29
,
1
23
.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-021-04325-4
.
Xie
H.
,
Du
H.
,
Yang
X.
&
Si
C.
2018a
Recent strategies in preparation of cellulose nanocrystals and cellulose nanofibrils derived from raw cellulose materials
.
International Journal of Polymer Science
2018
.
https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/7923068
.
Xie
S.
,
Zhang
X.
,
Walcott
M. P.
&
Lin
H.
2018b
Applications of cellulose nanocrystals: a review
.
Engineered Science
2
,
4
16
.
https://doi.org/10.30919/es.1803302
.
Yang
Y.
,
Chen
Z.
,
Zhang
J.
,
Wang
G.
,
Zhang
R.
&
Suo
D.
2019
Preparation and applications of the cellulose nanocrystal
.
International Journal of Polymer Science
2019
.
https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/1767028
.
Yoon
S. Y.
,
Han
S. H.
&
Shin
S. J.
2014
The effect of hemicelluloses and lignin on acid hydrolysis of cellulose
.
Energy
77
,
19
24
.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2014.01.104
.
Yu
H.
,
Zhang
D.
,
Lu
F.
&
Yao
J.
2016a
New approach for single-step extraction of carboxylated cellulose nanocrystals for their use as adsorbents and flocculants
.
ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering Scheme
4
,
2632
2643
.
https://doi.org/10.1021/acssuschemeng.6b00126
.
Yu
J.
,
Wang
C.
,
Wang
J.
&
Chu
F.
2016b
In situ development of self-reinforced cellulose nanocrystals based thermoplastic elastomers by atom transfer radical polymerization
.
Carbohydrate Polymers
141
,
143
150
.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2016.01.006
.
Zakeri
A. B.
,
Khandal
D.
,
Beuguel
Q.
,
Riedl
B.
,
Jason
A.
,
Tavares
R.
,
Carreau
P. J.
&
Heuzey
M.
2018
Cellulose nanocrystals by polyethyleneimine
.
The Journal of Science and Technology for Forest Products and Processes
7
(
4
),
6
12
.
Zaman
B.
,
Hardyanti
N.
,
Arief Budiharjo
M.
,
Budi Prasetyo
S.
,
Ramadhandi
A.
&
Listiyawati
A. T.
2020
Natural flocculant vs chemical flocculant where is better to used in wastewater treatment
.
IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering
852
(
1
),
0
5
.
https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/852/1/012014
.
Zhao
Y.
,
Zhang
Y.
,
Lindström
M. E.
&
Li
J.
2015
Tunicate cellulose nanocrystals: preparation, neat films nanocomposite films with glucomannans
.
Carbohydrate Polymers J
117
,
286
296
.
Zugenmaier
P.
2021
Order in cellulosics: historical review of crystal structure research on cellulose
.
Carbohydrate Polymers
254
,
117417
.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2020.117417
.
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Licence (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), which permits copying and redistribution for non-commercial purposes with no derivatives, provided the original work is properly cited (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).