Abstract
Due to its widespread consumption, paracetamol (PCT) has emerged as one of the leading contaminants that pollute water. Herein, a PCT removal of 99.6% was achieved using chemically activated carbon (CAC), derived from bamboo sawdust using KOH/FeCl3 as an activating agent, at optimal conditions of PCT (20 mg/L), CAC (0.5 g/L), contact time (90 min), and pH (8). Kinetic study revealed that the PCT adsorption process followed the pseudo-second-order kinetic model (R2 = 0.99), indicating that chemical adsorption dominated the adsorption mechanism. On the other hand, isotherm experimental data were best described by the Langmuir (R2 = 0.98) and Freundlich (R2 = 0.96) models. CAC had a maximum Langmuir monolayer capacity of 188.67 mg/g at a PCT concentration of 120 mg/L. Moreover, the Redlich–Peterson model gave the best fit (R2 = 0.99) to the experimental data, confirming that PCT adsorption was monolayer adsorption onto the heterogeneous surface. Thermodynamically, the PCT adsorption was exothermic, spontaneous, and favorable. The reusability study depicted that CAC can be successfully reused for five consecutive adsorption–desorption cycles. Furthermore, the application of CAC to environmental samples showed interesting results. The overall adsorption study indicated that CAC could serve as a promising adsorbent for eliminating PCT from water.
HIGHLIGHTS
Bamboo sawdust is an abundant waste material.
Highly efficient CAC adsorbent was synthesized from bamboo sawdust.
Bamboo sawdust-derived activated carbon showed remarkable PCT removal from aqueous solution.
Combined activation of bamboo sawdust (FeCl3 + KOH) resulted in superior removal of PCT from aqueous solution.
Application of CAC on real environmental samples indicated promising results.
INTRODUCTION
Rapid world population growth and economic expansion resulted in increased domestic and industrial effluent discharge to the environment, imposing a substantial environmental burden (Natarajan et al. 2022). Currently, pharmaceutical compounds have been classified as contaminants of emerging concern (CEC) in wastewater due to the potential adverse health consequences to humans (Escapa et al. 2017; George Nche et al. 2017; Wong et al. 2018). Frequent detection of these contaminants in the aquatic environment is considered a significant environmental risk (Verónica et al. 2011; Lima et al. 2021). Among the pharmaceuticals, paracetamol (PCT) is the most widely used drug for analgesic and antipyretic applications worldwide, with or without prescription (George Nche et al. 2017; Benyekkou et al. 2020). It has been reported that 58–68% of the consumed drug is excreted by human urine (Lima et al. 2019; Natarajan et al. 2021). Due to its wide consumption and poor absorption by the human body, it is continuously released into the environment (Natarajan et al. 2022). Based on previous reports, PCT concentration is 0.5–1.2 ppb and 0.012–0.058 ppb in the conventional wastewater treatment plant (WWTP) influent and effluent, respectively (Natarajan et al. 2022). The US has set a permissible level of PCT in potable water to be 0.0011–0.0013 ppb (Natarajan et al. 2021). Overdose of PCT causes adverse health consequences such as acute hepatic failure, liver damage, protein denaturation, and lipid peroxidation (Verónica et al. 2011; George Nche et al. 2017; Igwegbe et al. 2021). In light of these facts, PCT is an emerging water contaminant that demands research solutions (Lima et al. 2019).
Conventional WWTPs fail to sufficiently remove CEC as they are not explicitly designed to remove residual concentrations of such organic contaminants (Lima et al. 2019). Hence, concerns have been raised among researchers to come up with promising methods for the removal of PCT from water (Goh & Ismail 2020). To this end, various treatment methods, including advanced oxidation processes (AOPs) and adsorption processes, have been implemented to remove PCT from water. AOPs employed for PCT removal include photocatalysis (Thi & Lee 2017), electrochemical oxidation (Periyasamy & Muthuchamy 2018), electro-Fenton process (Orimolade et al. 2020), catalytic ozonation (Ziylan-Yavaş & Ince 2018), UV/H2O2 (Andreozzi et al. 2003), and photo-Fenton (Rad et al. 2015). AOPs can effectively remove CEC, but they are complex, expensive and can generate toxic by-products. Degradation of PCT using AOPs produces by-products such as low molecular weight compounds (Thanh et al. 2020). Approximately 20 transformation products were detected during the PCT degradation by the UV/chlorine AOP process (Patel et al. 2021).
These noted methods are still associated with high operational costs, secondary pollution, and sustainability. Consequently, the wide application of these methods at full scale for emerging contaminant removal is limited. To overcome this challenge, research work has continued. In this regard, an adsorption process is an interesting option from an economic, technical, and environmental point of view due to its ease of operation, no toxic by-product formation, application diversity or ease of being coupled with other existing processes, and low cost (George Nche et al. 2017; Lima et al. 2019; Shi et al. 2019; Benyekkou et al. 2020). Up till now, various adsorbents such as commercial activated carbon (Nguyen et al. 2020; Thanh et al. 2020), biochar (Benyekkou et al. 2020; Bursztyn Fuentes et al. 2020; Nadolny et al. 2020; Kerkhoff et al. 2021; Patel et al. 2021; Tunç et al. 2022), clay (Chauhan et al. 2020), magnetic nanomaterial (Loc et al. 2021), metal–organic framework (Yılmaz et al. 2021), multiwalled carbon nanotubes (Khamis et al. 2011), iron nanoparticles with a freshwater microalga (Praveen Kumar et al. 2021), chitosan magnetic nanobiosorbent (Natarajan et al. 2022), microalgae (Escapa et al. 2017), and groundnut shell (Malesic-Eleftheriadou et al. 2021) have been used to remove PCT from water. Most of these adsorbents have low contaminant uptake capacity (mostly less than 100 mg/g), low adsorption rate, and low regeneration capacity, and the reuse test was reported by only 14% of the authors (Igwegbe et al. 2021), separation difficulty after adsorption (Saucier et al. 2017), and preparation method complexity.
Commercial activated carbon is an efficient adsorbent widely employed for organic and inorganic contaminant removal. However, its challenging preparation technique (Bursztyn Fuentes et al. 2020) and higher cost of preparation (Nourmoradi et al. 2018; Patel et al. 2021) are significant obstacles to the broader application of this adsorbent in wastewater treatment. In this aspect, plant residue or waste biomass-derived activated carbon is a sustainable and double-beneficial water treatment option that has gained current attention among water scientists. Using biomass-based activated carbon in water treatment is an environmental waste management approach and, at the same time, a contaminant remediation strategy. Thus, biomass-derived activated carbon obtained by thermochemical conversion of biomass in an oxygen-limited condition is a promising alternative to commercial activated carbon due to its low cost (Tunç et al. 2022), high surface area (Chahinez et al. 2020; Cunha et al. 2020), good cation exchange capacity, excellent stability (Chahinez et al. 2020), and higher uptake capacity for organic and inorganic contaminants (Sumalinog et al. 2018). The efficiency of biomass-derived activated carbon depends on the feedstock type and the process conditions during thermal conversion (Sumalinog et al. 2018).
Bamboo is one of the most abundant and fast growing (5–12 years) plants in the world. It has several applications due to its unique qualities, such as good mechanical strength and higher carbon content (Lamaming et al. 2022). It is viewed as a sustainable, low-cost, and abundantly available resource suitable for use as an adsorbent (Lamaming et al. 2022). On top of that, bamboo sawdust is a waste of bamboo and used as a wood substitute in traditional and industrial applications. Uncontrollable bamboo sawdust contributes to environmental problems (Lamaming et al. 2022). Considering this, adsorbent preparation from bamboo sawdust for PCT removal from water is a beneficial approach.
Chemical activation of biomass-based carbon is known to improve the adsorptive capacity of the material due to the increment of surface area and formation of desirable surface functional groups. Most often, acid (H3PO4, H2SO4, and HCl) (Marqués et al. 2015; Benyekkou et al. 2020), alkaline (NaOH and KOH) (Li et al. 2018b; Wong et al. 2018), and salt (ZnCl2, K2CO3, and FeCl3) (Lima et al. 2019; Paredes-Laverde et al. 2019; Kerkhoff et al. 2021) activation methods were extensively reported. It is well known that the surface properties of carbon (surface area and porosity) derived from biomass can be improved by KOH activation, leading to an increase in adsorptive capacity (Ouyang et al. 2020). In contrast, the combined activation of plant residue-based carbon employing two or more chemicals for PCT removal is rarely reported (Reguyal et al. 2016). However, chemical modification using one activating agent has been extensively reported. In this regard, FeCl3 activation of spherical biochar (Loc et al. 2021), palm fiber activation with ZnCl2 (Grisales-Cifuentes et al. 2021), and innovative activated carbon derived from orange peels with FeCl3 activation (Tomul et al. 2019) were some of the single chemical activation methods reported for removal of PCT from water. Chemical activation of biomass with FeCl3 introduces extra adsorption sites (Fe–O) on the adsorbent's surface, which interact with pharmaceutical pollutants for enhanced removal (Reguyal et al. 2016; Zhao et al. 2018; Chen et al. 2019). Due to the benefits of single chemical activation using FeCl3 and KOH, combining KOH and FeCl3 activation would offer a synergistic benefit by improving the adsorbent surface properties (surface area and porosity) and incorporating desired additional adsorption sites (Fe–O) onto the adsorbent surface. In this work, bamboo sawdust was used for the PCT removal for the first time. Moreover, the combined activation of bamboo sawdust using FeCl3 and KOH for PCT removal from water is where the novelty of this research work resides. Environmental samples were collected from secondary WWTP effluent and analyzed to assess the adsorptive efficiency of chemically activated carbon (CAC). Adsorption process parameters such as initial PCT concentration, adsorbent dose, contact time, and pH were optimized using a one-factor at a time approach. Also, PCT adsorption kinetics, isotherm, thermodynamics, and adsorbent regeneration tests were conducted in batch mode.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Chemicals and instruments
PCT standard (C8H9NO2) with purity >99.7% was received from Cadila Pharmaceuticals Ltd. in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. Analytical grade chemicals such as FeCl3·6H2O, KOH, HCl, NaOH, and NaCl were purchased from Rankem chemical supplier (Ethiopia). These analytical grade chemicals were used without further purification. The adsorbent's Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectra were recorded in the wavenumber range 500–4,000 cm−1 on a Spectrum 65 PerkinElmer-FTIR. The activated carbon's crystal structure was studied using the X-ray diffraction (XRD; Rigaku MiniFlex 600 Benchtop) analysis. The PCT concentrations in aqueous solutions were analyzed using a UV–Vis spectrophotometer (UV1610, China) at 243 nm.
Preparation of adsorbents
Screening of the adsorbents
An adsorbent screening test was conducted to select the best adsorbent for PCT removal from water. In different conical flasks, an adsorbent dosage of 0.05 g was added to 50 ml of PCT solution (20 mg/L). The samples were agitated at 200 rpm and 25 °C for 60 min. After adsorption, the used adsorbent was separated from the solution using filtration. The filtrate was then analyzed using UV–Vis spectrophotometer for PCT determination. The PCT removal efficiencies of the adsorbents were evaluated, and the bamboo-based adsorbent with the highest PCT removal efficiency was used in the subsequent adsorption study.
Characterization of the adsorbent
The major characterization techniques employed for the bamboo sawdust-derived raw and CAC include XRD, FTIR, Brunauer, Emmett, and Teller (BET) surface area, and pH of the point of zero charge (pHpzc) characterization techniques. Further information on characterization techniques for CAC was given in our previous work (Wakejo et al. 2022). Surface functional groups of the synthesized CAC were identified using Spectrum 65 PerkinElmer-FTIR for 4,000–400 cm−1 (resolution: 4 cm−1, no of scans: 16) using KBr pellets. The crystalline phase and purity of the CAC and BSC were analyzed using the XRD analysis. The XRD analysis was carried out employing Cu Kα radiation to generate X-rays at 1.54441 Å wavelength at experimental conditions: 15 mA, 40 kV, and 2θ ranging from 10° to 60°. Moreover, BET surface areas of the activated carbon were evaluated with nitrogen adsorption–desorption at 77°K using the SA-9600 Series Surface Area Analyzer (Horiba Instruments, Inc). The BSC and CAC surface morphology was studied using a Carl Zeiss Gemini field emission scanning electron microscope (FE-SEM) operating at 20 kV.
PCT analysis
Batch adsorption experiment
Adsorption kinetic study
Adsorption isotherm study
The constant K in the D–R model is the slope of the plot of ln qe versus ε2, and the adsorption capacity, qm (mg/g) is represented by the intercept.
Adsorption thermodynamic study
Adsorbent reusability study
An adsorbent reuse test was conducted to investigate the feasibility of the adsorbent for further applications. The regeneration experiment was conducted at optimum PCT adsorption process conditions obtained in the previous steps. Various solvents such as hot water, methanol, NaOH, HCl, and NaOH + methanol were used for PCT desorption and optimized to achieve the best result. These solvents were employed in previous studies (Lima et al. 2019; Chauhan et al. 2020; Thanh et al. 2020; Kerkhoff et al. 2021; Gómez-Avilés et al. 2022) to desorb PCT from various adsorbents.
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
Adsorbent characterization results
PCT adsorption
Adsorbent screening
Effect of pH on PCT removal
Effect of contact time
Effect of PCT initial concentration
Effect of adsorbent dose
Adsorption kinetics
Pseudo-first-order model . | Pseudo-second-order model . | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
K1 (1/min) | qe,cal (mg/g) | qe,exp (mg/g) | R2 | K2 (g/mg min) | qe,cal (mg/g) | qe,exp (mg/g) | R2 |
0.07403 | 39.90 | 3.685 | 0.916 | 0.198 | 39.90 | 40.02 | 0.999 |
Intraparticle model . | Elovich . | ||||||
Kid (mg/g min1/2) | K0 | R2 | α (mg/g min) | β (g/mg) | R2 | ||
0.300 | 37.343 | 0.881 | 3.654 | 38.153 | 0.908 |
Pseudo-first-order model . | Pseudo-second-order model . | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
K1 (1/min) | qe,cal (mg/g) | qe,exp (mg/g) | R2 | K2 (g/mg min) | qe,cal (mg/g) | qe,exp (mg/g) | R2 |
0.07403 | 39.90 | 3.685 | 0.916 | 0.198 | 39.90 | 40.02 | 0.999 |
Intraparticle model . | Elovich . | ||||||
Kid (mg/g min1/2) | K0 | R2 | α (mg/g min) | β (g/mg) | R2 | ||
0.300 | 37.343 | 0.881 | 3.654 | 38.153 | 0.908 |
Adsorption isotherms
Langmuir . | Freundlich . | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
qm (mg/g) | b | R2 | KF (mg/g) (L/mg)1/n | n | R2 |
188.67 | 0.489 | 0.98 | 52.70 | 7.98 | 0.96 |
Redlich–Peterson . | Dubinin–Radushkevich (D–R) . | ||||
Β (L/mg) | A (L/g) | R2 | qm (mg/g) | K | R2 |
0.71 | 71.37 | 0.99 | 133.96 | 1.34 × 10−8 | 0.77 |
Langmuir . | Freundlich . | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
qm (mg/g) | b | R2 | KF (mg/g) (L/mg)1/n | n | R2 |
188.67 | 0.489 | 0.98 | 52.70 | 7.98 | 0.96 |
Redlich–Peterson . | Dubinin–Radushkevich (D–R) . | ||||
Β (L/mg) | A (L/g) | R2 | qm (mg/g) | K | R2 |
0.71 | 71.37 | 0.99 | 133.96 | 1.34 × 10−8 | 0.77 |
The separation factor, RL, which is based on the Langmuir model, was used to identify the adsorption favorability of adsorbate onto adsorbent (El-Azazy et al. 2021); thus, if RL is >1, then the process is not favorable for adsorption, while if RL = 1, then the adsorption is linear. The adsorption process is favorable and spontaneous if the value of RL is between 0 and 1. On the other hand, if RL = zero, then the adsorption process is irreversible. In this work, the calculated RL value is 0.02, which is between 0 and 1, indicating that the adsorption of PCT onto CAC is favorable. The maximum monolayer adsorption capacity is 188.67 mg/g. The linear isotherm model analysis revealed that Langmuir (R2 = 0.98) and Freundlich (R2 = 0.96) models described the PCT isotherm data well, as shown in Figure 9. This indicates that the adsorption behavior of the PCT onto CAC cannot be explained using only one isotherm model. Instead, it can be explained by the combination of the two models. This result is further elaborated by analyzing the Redlich–Peterson isotherm because this model is a mix of Langmuir and Freundlich isotherms (Ayawei et al. 2017). The Redlich–Peterson isotherm model (R2 = 0.99) gave the best fit to the experimental data confirming that the PCT adsorption onto the CAC is a combined process. These results suggested that the PCT adsorption onto CAC is monolayer adsorption onto the heterogeneous surface and agrees with the previous work (Li et al. 2018a). From the Freundlich isotherm, 1/n indicates the intensity of Freundlich adsorption (Shokoohi et al. 2019; Alnajrani & Alsager 2020). In this study, 1/n for PCT adsorption is 0.12, a value between 0 and 1, showing preferential PCT adsorption onto CAC.
Thermodynamic study
PCT adsorption thermodynamic analysis was conducted using thermodynamic parameters, i.e., ΔS0, ΔH0, and ΔG0 with varying temperatures (25–55 °C). Table 3 describes the estimated values of the thermodynamic parameters for PCT adsorption onto the CAC. Thermodynamic parameters of PCT adsorption onto CAC were evaluated using Equations (14)–(16), and the results are given in Table 3.
Temperature (K) . | ΔG0 (KJ/mol) . | ΔH0 (KJ/mol) . | ΔS0 (KJ/mol·K) . |
---|---|---|---|
298.15 | −13.771 | − 88.287 | − 0.256 |
308.15 | −66.78 | ||
318.15 | −5.803 | ||
328.15 | −5.825 |
Temperature (K) . | ΔG0 (KJ/mol) . | ΔH0 (KJ/mol) . | ΔS0 (KJ/mol·K) . |
---|---|---|---|
298.15 | −13.771 | − 88.287 | − 0.256 |
308.15 | −66.78 | ||
318.15 | −5.803 | ||
328.15 | −5.825 |
Table 3 presents negative values for all the thermodynamic parameters (ΔH0, ΔS0, and ΔG0). Negative values of ΔG0 showed the spontaneity of the sorption process (Huang et al. 2018). These thermodynamic study results show that higher temperatures decreased PCT adsorption onto the CAC. The negative values of change in enthalpy (ΔH0) for PCT adsorption showed that the PCT sorption was an exothermic process (Kerkhoff et al. 2021). Exothermic adsorptive nature (Loc et al. 2021) was observed due to a negative ΔH0 value. A negative ΔS0 value for the sorption of PCT onto CAC displayed less disorder at the liquid–solid interphase resulting in an effortless bond formation (Natarajan et al. 2022). Finally, the change in Gibbs free energy ΔG0, determined using Equation (15), showed negative values for all the temperatures (25, 35, 45, and 55 °C), indicating spontaneous adsorption (Paredes-Laverde et al. 2019).
Reusability study
The efficiency of the adsorbent in treating PCT-laden wastewater can be explained by its reusability for practical applications on a large scale (Show et al. 2021). The reuse capacity of the adsorbent shows its economic feasibility. PCT desorption optimization tests were done using solvents such as hot water, methanol, NaOH, HCl, and NaOH + methanol to obtain maximum desorption results. The PCT removal efficiency of CAC after the first adsorption–desorption cycle with 0.3 M NaOH, methanol, 3% NaOH + methanol, and 0.3 M HCl was 60.3, 40.25, 63.62, and 90.24%, respectively.
Comparison of CAC with other adsorbents
The bamboo sawdust-derived activated carbon was compared with other adsorbents used in previous works to remove PCT from water, as shown in Table 4. The adsorption process is highly dependent on the operational parameters such as adsorbent dose, initial pollutant concentration, pH, temperature, contact time; thus, the sorption conditions were presented for adsorption of PCT using various adsorbents. Maximum removals of PCT have been reported for each adsorbent at optimum operating conditions. Most of the previous studies showed that PCT adsorption onto various adsorbents followed Langmuir isotherm and pseudo-second-order kinetic models. However, isotherm models such as Sips, Dubinin–Radushkevich, Temkin and Freundlich have also been reported for the adsorption of PCT onto different adsorbents. The optimal adsorption process condition, fitness of isotherm, and kinetic models with experimental data depend on the specific interactions between PCT and proposed adsorbents.
Adsorbent . | Capacity (maximum uptake) in mg/g . | Operational conditions . | Isotherm and kinetics data best fit models . | Adsorbent capacity (maximum uptake in mg/g) . | PCT removal (%) . | References . |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Green synthesized iron nanoparticles with fresh microalgae | – | pH = 3.0, temperature = 303 K, salinity (NaCl) = 20 mg/L, and adsorbent dose = 105 mg/L | Langmuir model (R2 = 0.994) and pseudo-second-order kinetic model (R2 = 0.998) | 11.62 | 98.6% from pure water and 91.3% from river water | Praveen Kumar et al. (2021) |
Chitosan magnetic nanosorbents | 96.3 | Contact time = 60 min, pH = 5.0, and temperature = 303 K | Langmuir isotherm (R2 = 0.99) and pseudo-second-order model (R2 = 0.99) | 96.3 | 96.7 | Natarajan et al. (2022) |
Activated carbon synthesized from spent tea leaves | 59.2 | PCT = 10 mg/L, adsorbent dose = 0.5 g, pH = 3, and reaction time = 60 min | Langmuir isotherm model (R2 = 0.970) and obeyed the pseudo-second-order kinetics model (R2 = 0.999) | 59.2 | – | Wong et al. (2018) |
Fe(III)-based metal–organic framework-coated cellulose paper | – | Initial PCT concentration = 35.60 mg/L, pH = 6.44, agitation time = 167.06 min, and adsorbent dosage = 0.8435 g/L | Pseudo-second-order kinetic models (R2 = 0.99) and Langmuir model (R2 = 0.99) | – | 89.75 | Yılmaz et al. (2021) |
Commercial activated carbon | 121 | Adsorbent dose = 1.0 g/L, pH = 7.0, temperature = 298 K, and PCT initial con. ∼100–1,200 mg/L | Redlich–Peterson (R2 = 0.993), Avrami model (R2 = 0.997), and Elovich model (R2 = 0.991) | 221 (taken from Langmuir model) | – | Thanh et al. (2020) |
Activated carbon | 15.90 | Adsorbent dose = 0.16 g/100 mL, PCT con. = 11.52 mg/L, and contact time = 90.52min | Langmuir (R2 = 0.996), Temkin (R2 = 0.998), and pseudo-second-order kinetic model (R2 ≥ 0.99) | 15.90 | 99.24 | Tunç et al. (2022) |
Activated carbon from Butia capitata endocarp | 100.6 | Equilibrium time = 180 min | Langmuir model (R2 = 0.971) and Elovich (R2 = 0.994) | 100.60 | – | Kerkhoff et al. (2021) |
Nanosized hematite-assembled carbon spheres | 49.9 | Equilibrium time = 120 min, temperature = 598 K, and pH = 7.0, adsorbent dose = 2 g/L | Langmuir model (R2 ≥ 0.994) and pseudo-second-order (R2 ≥ 0.975), and Elovich models (R2 ≥ 0.979) | 49.90 | – | Loc et al. (2021) |
Silica microspheres | 89.0 | Contact time = 30 min, pH = 5.0, PCT = 20 mg/L, temperature = 303 K, and sorbent dose = 100 mg/L | Freundlich isotherm (R2 = 0.99) and second-order kinetic model (R2 = 0.99) | 89.0 | 96.7 | Natarajan et al. (2021) |
Carbon-based adsorbents from brewery waste | – | Equilibrium time = 20 min, pH = 4, and adsorbent = 0.45 g | Langmuir isotherm (R2 = 0.994) | 30.8 | 98.3 | Nadolny et al. (2020) |
Groundnut shell | 3.02 | – | Langmuir (R2 = 0.99) and Sips model (R2 = 0.99) | – | N'diaye & Bollahi (2019) | |
CAC | 188.67 | PCT con = 20 mg/L, CAC dose = 0.5 g/L, contact time = 90 min, pH = 8.0, and temperature = 298 K | Langmuir, Freundlich, and Redlich–Peterson isotherm models and pseudo-second-order model | 188.67 | 99.6 | This study |
Adsorbent . | Capacity (maximum uptake) in mg/g . | Operational conditions . | Isotherm and kinetics data best fit models . | Adsorbent capacity (maximum uptake in mg/g) . | PCT removal (%) . | References . |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Green synthesized iron nanoparticles with fresh microalgae | – | pH = 3.0, temperature = 303 K, salinity (NaCl) = 20 mg/L, and adsorbent dose = 105 mg/L | Langmuir model (R2 = 0.994) and pseudo-second-order kinetic model (R2 = 0.998) | 11.62 | 98.6% from pure water and 91.3% from river water | Praveen Kumar et al. (2021) |
Chitosan magnetic nanosorbents | 96.3 | Contact time = 60 min, pH = 5.0, and temperature = 303 K | Langmuir isotherm (R2 = 0.99) and pseudo-second-order model (R2 = 0.99) | 96.3 | 96.7 | Natarajan et al. (2022) |
Activated carbon synthesized from spent tea leaves | 59.2 | PCT = 10 mg/L, adsorbent dose = 0.5 g, pH = 3, and reaction time = 60 min | Langmuir isotherm model (R2 = 0.970) and obeyed the pseudo-second-order kinetics model (R2 = 0.999) | 59.2 | – | Wong et al. (2018) |
Fe(III)-based metal–organic framework-coated cellulose paper | – | Initial PCT concentration = 35.60 mg/L, pH = 6.44, agitation time = 167.06 min, and adsorbent dosage = 0.8435 g/L | Pseudo-second-order kinetic models (R2 = 0.99) and Langmuir model (R2 = 0.99) | – | 89.75 | Yılmaz et al. (2021) |
Commercial activated carbon | 121 | Adsorbent dose = 1.0 g/L, pH = 7.0, temperature = 298 K, and PCT initial con. ∼100–1,200 mg/L | Redlich–Peterson (R2 = 0.993), Avrami model (R2 = 0.997), and Elovich model (R2 = 0.991) | 221 (taken from Langmuir model) | – | Thanh et al. (2020) |
Activated carbon | 15.90 | Adsorbent dose = 0.16 g/100 mL, PCT con. = 11.52 mg/L, and contact time = 90.52min | Langmuir (R2 = 0.996), Temkin (R2 = 0.998), and pseudo-second-order kinetic model (R2 ≥ 0.99) | 15.90 | 99.24 | Tunç et al. (2022) |
Activated carbon from Butia capitata endocarp | 100.6 | Equilibrium time = 180 min | Langmuir model (R2 = 0.971) and Elovich (R2 = 0.994) | 100.60 | – | Kerkhoff et al. (2021) |
Nanosized hematite-assembled carbon spheres | 49.9 | Equilibrium time = 120 min, temperature = 598 K, and pH = 7.0, adsorbent dose = 2 g/L | Langmuir model (R2 ≥ 0.994) and pseudo-second-order (R2 ≥ 0.975), and Elovich models (R2 ≥ 0.979) | 49.90 | – | Loc et al. (2021) |
Silica microspheres | 89.0 | Contact time = 30 min, pH = 5.0, PCT = 20 mg/L, temperature = 303 K, and sorbent dose = 100 mg/L | Freundlich isotherm (R2 = 0.99) and second-order kinetic model (R2 = 0.99) | 89.0 | 96.7 | Natarajan et al. (2021) |
Carbon-based adsorbents from brewery waste | – | Equilibrium time = 20 min, pH = 4, and adsorbent = 0.45 g | Langmuir isotherm (R2 = 0.994) | 30.8 | 98.3 | Nadolny et al. (2020) |
Groundnut shell | 3.02 | – | Langmuir (R2 = 0.99) and Sips model (R2 = 0.99) | – | N'diaye & Bollahi (2019) | |
CAC | 188.67 | PCT con = 20 mg/L, CAC dose = 0.5 g/L, contact time = 90 min, pH = 8.0, and temperature = 298 K | Langmuir, Freundlich, and Redlich–Peterson isotherm models and pseudo-second-order model | 188.67 | 99.6 | This study |
Environmental application
The removal of PCT by CAC was tested on different water matrix, including ultrapure water, tap water, and real wastewater. Previous studies indicated that pharmaceutical contaminant removal was correlated well with the UV254 reduction and confirmed that it could be an indicator to control the performance of pharmaceuticals adsorption in tertiary treatment (Alves et al. 2018). Moreover, the studies suggested UV254 as a handy indicator for approximating pharmaceutical contaminant removal in practical applications where direct pharmaceutical concentration quantification is not available (Zietzschmann et al. 2014). Herein, three different sets of experiments were conducted for pure water, tap water, and WWTP effluent to investigate the effect of water background matrix (background organic matter) on the PCT adsorption using CAC. On the other hand, the wavelength scan of PCT showed maximum absorbance at 243 nm. The UV254 and UV243 were used to estimate PCT removal from real environmental samples. Before spiking PCT to the water samples, UV254 and UV243 were 0, 0; 0, 0; and 0.232, 0.343 for ultrapure, tap and real wastewater, respectively. After spiking PCT to water samples, the UV254 and UV243 were 0.857, 1.167; 0.878, 1.177; 1.174, 1.592 for ultrapure, tap, and real wastewater, respectively. The absorbance increase is directly related to the spiked amount of PCT in the water samples. Herein, the increase in UV243 is more significant than the increase in UV254. This is ascribed to the maximum absorbance of PCT at UV243. Thus, the decrease in absorbance at 243 nm is also directly correlated with decrease in PCT concentration in environmental samples. Adsorption experiment was conducted at optimum parameters obtained in the previous steps. Adsorbent dosage was varied (0.5, 1.5 and 2.0 g/L) to achieve the maximum removal of PCT from real environmental samples. All the tested adsorbent doses resulted in UV254 and UV243 absorbance values less than the initial absorbance of the samples (unspiked initial samples). This shows that CAC can successfully remove PCT in the presence of complex organic matter.
Mechanism of PCT adsorption
CONCLUSION
CAC was successfully prepared at 700 °C, characterized, and applied for PCT sorption. The adsorption process parameters (initial PCT concentration, pH, contact time, and CAC dose) were optimized using a one-factor at a time approach. Accordingly, optimal conditions (CAC = 0.5 g/L, pH = 8.0, time = 90 min, and PCT concentration = 20 mg/L) were obtained. At these optimum conditions, PCT removal of 99.6% was achieved. The PCT adsorption was influenced by varying the initial PCT concentration, pH, contact time, and CAC dose. Various sorption isotherm models, kinetic and thermodynamic equations were applied to sorption data. Isotherm study showed that the adsorption of PCT onto the CAC surface was in a monolayer on the heterogeneous surface of CAC with a maximum monolayer Langmuir sorption capacity of 188.68 mg/g. Pseudo-second order gave the best fit for the adsorption study. The process of PCT adsorption onto the CAC was exothermic (negative ΔH), spontaneous, and favorable. Application of the CAC in real wastewater samples showed remarkably good results. However, further studies need to be conducted to investigate the feasibility of using CAC for other pharmaceutical contaminants. Overall, the CAC is a low-cost, efficient, and reusable adsorbent with a promising potential for application in PCT removal from water.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
The Africa Center of Excellence for Water Management (ACEWM), Addis Ababa University, Ethiopia, is acknowledged for its financial support.
DATA AVAILABILITY STATEMENT
All relevant data are included in the paper or its Supplementary Information.
CONFLICT OF INTEREST
The authors declare there is no conflict.