Abstract
In this work, the removal of ammonia nitrogen (NH4-N) on activated carbon prepared from waste tyres was conducted in batch studies as a function of adsorbent dosage, pH, temperature, contact time and initial concentration. The pore structure of activated carbon was characterized by N2 adsorption. The optimal conditions for the efficient adsorption of ammonia nitrogen onto waste tyre-activated carbon were found to be an adsorbent dosage of 0.4 g/L, pH 9.0, temperature of 20 °C, contact time of 90 min and initial ammonium nitrogen concentration of 50 mg/L. The kinetics studies showed that the pseudo-second-order model offered the best connection of the adsorption data. The Langmuir model was found to provide the best fit for the experimental data. The thermodynamic results showed that the adsorption of ammonia onto waste tyre-activated carbon was exothermic, random and spontaneous in nature.
HIGHLIGHTS
Ammonia nitrogen was removed from wastewater using activated carbon prepared from waste tyres.
Pore structure of activated carbon was characterized by N2 adsorption.
Optimal conditions for efficient adsorption were found as follows: an adsorbent dosage of 0.4 g/L, pH 9.0, temperature of 20 °C, contact time of 90 min and initial concentration of 50 mg/L.
The adsorption process, isotherms, kinetic and thermodynamic parameters were evaluated.
INTRODUCTION
Ammonia nitrogen (-N) was found to be the main nitrogen pollutant in wastewater. The presence of pollutants in wastewater affects the life of organisms and may damage all ecosystems (Alardhi et al. 2020; Kadhum et al. 2021). Excessive ammonia nitrogen concentration is harmful to aquatic life. Therefore, the removal of
-N from wastewater is important in the alleviation of environmental problems such as eutrophication and algae blossoms (Chen et al. 2021; Kabuba et al. 2022). The physical, chemical and biological methods such as air stripping, membrane technology, ion exchange, adsorption, struvite precipitation, electrochemical oxidation, nitrification and denitrification, simultaneous nitrification and denitrification, anaerobic ammonium oxidation and microbial fuel cells have been developed for the removal of ammonia nitrogen from wastewater (Albayati & Doyle 2014; Cho et al. 2020; Ren et al. 2021; Ali et al. 2022). However, these methods have shortcomings such as high operational costs, high sensitivity to process parameters, generation of more wastes that involve additional treatment and disposal, formation of fouling on equipment surfaces and low ammonia removal efficiency (Dong et al. 2019). Recently, the adsorption of ammonia nitrogen using activated carbons has been given great attention. Activated carbons have numerous advantages such as a large surface area, a highly developed porous structure, and the possibility to modify the porous structure and surface chemistry to adjust it for a special application (Gonҫalves et al. 2011). Due to the high cost of commercially produced activated carbons, many researchers have been interested in developing activated carbons using low-cost waste materials with a high carbon content and a low inorganic matter. Different materials such as wood, corn corb, olive stones, lignite, coconut shells, fruit stones, nutshells, rice straw and waste tea have been developed (Yorgun & Yıldız 2015). Recently, Ren et al. (2021) modified the activated carbon with iron to improve the adsorption efficiency of ammonia nitrogen in low-temperature wastewater. Therefore, waste tyres represent another interesting source to produce activated carbons since they have high carbon content. Production of activated carbon from waste tyres also solves the problem of environmental pollution (Ariyadejwanich et al. 2003). According to a survey of previously published research, there is no work on the removal of ammonia nitrogen from wastewater using activated carbon prepared from waste tyres. The aim of this work is to explore a new adsorbent material for the removal of ammonium nitrogen from wastewater using activated carbon prepared from waste tyres. The effect of process parameters such as adsorbent dosage, contact time, initial ammonium concentration, pH and temperature were studied. The isotherms, kinetic and thermodynamic parameters were evaluated to examine the controlling mechanism of the adsorption process.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Materials
Waste tyre pyrolysis char (WTPC) was obtained from a local company. WTPC was sieved and only the fraction of particle sizes between 0.5 and 2 mm were selected for the preparation of activated carbons (ACs). NH4Cl (99.5%) and deionized water were used for the preparation of stock solutions. NaOH (95%) and HCl (35–38%) were used to adjust the pH. All the reagents and chemicals used in the present work were of analytical grade and were acquired by Merck.
Preparation of activated carbon
The waste tyre char was washed with distilled water to remove impurities and dried for 24 h at 110 °C in the oven. During physical activation, 100 g of waste tyre char sample was loaded into a quartz crucible, and placed in the middle of the quartz tubular reactor. The reactor was inserted inside a tube furnace. The furnace was fitted with a thermometer to measure the inside temperature. The reactor was first purged with nitrogen gas for 1 h to eliminate the presence of oxygen and to generate the inert conditions required for activation. The furnace was then heated from room temperature to 925 °C under an N2 atmosphere, with a heating rate of 5 °C/min and N2 flowrate of 200 mL/min. When the temperature inside the reactor was 925 °C, N2 gas was replaced with steam at the flow rate of 500 mL/min which was supplied by the steam generator. The waste tyre char was activated for 240 min. After activation, the furnace was allowed to cool down to room temperature, and the produced activated carbon was withdrawn from the reactor, ground and sieved to <100 μm. After sieving, the sample was washed with distilled water to remove impurities and dried in the oven at 110 °C for 24 h.
Adsorbent characterization
The surface properties of the prepared waste tyre char-activated carbon
Sample . | SBET (m2/g) . | Sext (m2/g) . | VTotal (cm3/g) . | Vmicro (cm3/g) . | Vmeso (cm3/g) . | R2 . |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AC925-240 | 722 | 198.5 | 0.78 | 0.18 | 0.44 | 0.99 |
Sample . | SBET (m2/g) . | Sext (m2/g) . | VTotal (cm3/g) . | Vmicro (cm3/g) . | Vmeso (cm3/g) . | R2 . |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AC925-240 | 722 | 198.5 | 0.78 | 0.18 | 0.44 | 0.99 |
Adsorption studies
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
Characterization of activated carbons
Operation conditions during activation tests
Activation . | . | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Run . | Steam flowrate (mL/min) . | Heating rate (°C/min) . | Temperature (°C) . | Time (min) . | Activation yield (%) . |
1 | 500 | 5 | 900 | 120 | 73.40 |
2 | 500 | 5 | 900 | 240 | 54.96 |
3 | 500 | 5 | 925 | 120 | 65.32 |
4 | 500 | 5 | 925 | 240 | 49.85 |
5 | 500 | 5 | 950 | 120 | 58.44 |
6 | 500 | 5 | 950 | 240 | 42.68 |
Activation . | . | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Run . | Steam flowrate (mL/min) . | Heating rate (°C/min) . | Temperature (°C) . | Time (min) . | Activation yield (%) . |
1 | 500 | 5 | 900 | 120 | 73.40 |
2 | 500 | 5 | 900 | 240 | 54.96 |
3 | 500 | 5 | 925 | 120 | 65.32 |
4 | 500 | 5 | 925 | 240 | 49.85 |
5 | 500 | 5 | 950 | 120 | 58.44 |
6 | 500 | 5 | 950 | 240 | 42.68 |
When the activation time was 120 min, the yield decreased from 73.40 to 65.32% when the temperature increased from 900 to 925 °C, and further decreased to 58.44 when the temperature increased from 925 to 950 °C. The same trend occurred when the activation time was set to 180 and 240 min when the temperature was increased from 900 to 950 °C. This might be due to the dependency of the reaction rate on the activation temperature as the reaction constant k changes with temperature according to the Arrhenius law (Aquilanti et al. 2010). Moreover, when the actuation temperature expanded, more compounds will be vaporized, coming about in a diminish within the mass of enacted carbon relative to the initial mass of tyre char. Expanded burn-off in turn reduced the activation yields. At 900 °C, the activation yield was reduced from 73.4 to 54.96% when the activation time was varied from 120 to 240 min. Correspondingly, the yield declined from 65.32 to 49.85% at 925 °C when the activation time was increased from 120 to 240 min. A further decline of activation yield was revealed at 950 °C when the activation time was increased from 120 to 240 min, which declined from 58.44 to 42.68%. This was due to the fact that a longer activation time gave more carbon exposure to react with steam, hence higher reaction took place (Mui et al. 2010).
Elemental analysis of tyre char and prepared activated carbons
Ash content
Ash contents of WTPC and carbons activated at different temperatures and activation times.
Ash contents of WTPC and carbons activated at different temperatures and activation times.
Porous properties of WTPC and prepared activated carbons
BET surface area and total pore volume (at P/Po = 0.97) of tyre char-activated carbons by the multipoint BET method
WTPC and activated carbons . | SBET (m2/g) . | VTot (cm3/g) . |
---|---|---|
WTPC | 32 | 0.03 |
AC900-120 | 238 | 0.41 |
AC900-240 | 587 | 0.67 |
AC925-120 | 315 | 0.42 |
AC925-240 | 722 | 0.78 |
AC950-120 | 457 | 0.49 |
AC950-240 | 725 | 0.88 |
WTPC and activated carbons . | SBET (m2/g) . | VTot (cm3/g) . |
---|---|---|
WTPC | 32 | 0.03 |
AC900-120 | 238 | 0.41 |
AC900-240 | 587 | 0.67 |
AC925-120 | 315 | 0.42 |
AC925-240 | 722 | 0.78 |
AC950-120 | 457 | 0.49 |
AC950-240 | 725 | 0.88 |
N2 adsorption–desorption isotherms (77 K) of activated carbons from steam activation at 900 °C.
N2 adsorption–desorption isotherms (77 K) of activated carbons from steam activation at 900 °C.
N2 adsorption–desorption isotherms (77 K) of activated carbons from steam activation at 925 °C.
N2 adsorption–desorption isotherms (77 K) of activated carbons from steam activation at 925 °C.
N2 adsorption–desorption isotherms (77 K) of activated carbons from steam activation at 950 °C.
N2 adsorption–desorption isotherms (77 K) of activated carbons from steam activation at 950 °C.
Porous characteristics of WTPC and various prepared activated carbons are shown in Table 3. WTPC had a lower BET surface area and total volume of 32 m2/g and 0.03 cm3/g, indicating its non-porous structure. Steam activation of WTPC under a nitrogen atmosphere showed a significant effect on the BET surface area (SBET) and total pore volume (VTot) as shown in Table 3. Both SBET and VTot increased with increasing activation time under the same activation temperature. When the activation temperatures were kept constant at 900, 925 and 950 °C while varying the activation time from 120 to 240 min, the BET surface area increased from 238 to 587 m2/g, 315 to 722 m2/g and 457 to 725 m2/g, respectively. Similarly, the total pore volume increased from 0.41 to 0.67 cm3/g, 0.42 to 0.78 cm3/g and 0.49 to 0.88 cm3/g, respectively.
The activation temperature also had a substantial effect on both SBET and VTot. When the activation times were kept constant at 120 and 240 min while varying the activation temperature from 900, 925 and 950 °C, the BET surface area increased from 238 to 457 m2/g and 587 to 725 m2/g, respectively. Correspondingly, the total pore volume increased from 0.41 to 0.49 cm3/g and 0.67 to 0.88 cm3/g, respectively.
The t-method was used to determine the external surface areas (Sext) and micropore volumes (Vmic), and the results are presented in Table 4. Some modified adsorbent materials such as SBA-15, MCM-41, NH2/MCM-41 and MCM-48 for aquatic pollutants are compared and presented in Table 5.
External surface areas, micropore volumes and calculated mesopore volumes of tyre char-activated carbons using the t-method
Samples . | Sext (m2/g) . | Vmic (cm3/g) . | Vmes (cm3/g) . | VTot (cm3/g) . | R2 . |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
WTPC | 32 | 0.0 | 0.18 | 0.18 | 0.97 |
AC900-120 | 93.8 | 0.12 | 0.38 | 0.41 | 1.00 |
AC900-240 | 209.6 | 0.28 | 0.41 | 0.67 | 0.99 |
AC925-120 | 105.3 | 0.17 | 0.37 | 0.42 | 1.00 |
AC925-240 | 198.5 | 0.18 | 0.44 | 0.78 | 0.99 |
AC950-120 | 215.6 | 0.19 | 0.39 | 0.49 | 0.99 |
AC950-240 | 529.5 | 0.14 | 0.60 | 0.88 | 1.00 |
Samples . | Sext (m2/g) . | Vmic (cm3/g) . | Vmes (cm3/g) . | VTot (cm3/g) . | R2 . |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
WTPC | 32 | 0.0 | 0.18 | 0.18 | 0.97 |
AC900-120 | 93.8 | 0.12 | 0.38 | 0.41 | 1.00 |
AC900-240 | 209.6 | 0.28 | 0.41 | 0.67 | 0.99 |
AC925-120 | 105.3 | 0.17 | 0.37 | 0.42 | 1.00 |
AC925-240 | 198.5 | 0.18 | 0.44 | 0.78 | 0.99 |
AC950-120 | 215.6 | 0.19 | 0.39 | 0.49 | 0.99 |
AC950-240 | 529.5 | 0.14 | 0.60 | 0.88 | 1.00 |
Comparative structure properties with some adsorbent materials
WTPC and activated carbons . | SBET (m2/g) . | VTot (cm3/g) . | References . |
---|---|---|---|
WTPC | 32 | 0.03 | This study |
AC950-240 | 725 | 0.88 | This study |
SBA-15 | 845.42 | 0.854 | Atiyah et al. (2022a) |
MCM-41 | 1,200 | 0.7395 | Atiyah et al. (2022b) |
NH2/MCM-41 | 11.954 | 0.00867 | Atiyah et al. (2022b) |
MCM-48 | 1,120 | 0.678 | Sastre et al. (2016) |
WTPC and activated carbons . | SBET (m2/g) . | VTot (cm3/g) . | References . |
---|---|---|---|
WTPC | 32 | 0.03 | This study |
AC950-240 | 725 | 0.88 | This study |
SBA-15 | 845.42 | 0.854 | Atiyah et al. (2022a) |
MCM-41 | 1,200 | 0.7395 | Atiyah et al. (2022b) |
NH2/MCM-41 | 11.954 | 0.00867 | Atiyah et al. (2022b) |
MCM-48 | 1,120 | 0.678 | Sastre et al. (2016) |
Scanning electron microscope
The effect of adsorbent dosage
The effect of the tyre char-activated carbon dosage on ammonia nitrogen adsorption.
The effect of the tyre char-activated carbon dosage on ammonia nitrogen adsorption.
The effect of pH



The effect of temperature
The effect of contact time

Effect of initial ammonium concentration
The effect of initial concentration on ammonia nitrogen adsorption.
Adsorption kinetics
Pseudo-first-order and pseudo-second-order kinetic parameters for adsorption rate expressions
. | First-order kinetic model . | Second-order kinetic model . | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
qe (exp) (mg/g) . | k1 (1/min) . | qe (calc) (mg/g) . | R2 . | k2 (g/mg. min) . | qe (calc) (mg/g) . | R2 . |
29.8 | 0.0015 | 32.57 | 0.9783 | 0.00022 | 3.33 | 0.8963 |
. | First-order kinetic model . | Second-order kinetic model . | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
qe (exp) (mg/g) . | k1 (1/min) . | qe (calc) (mg/g) . | R2 . | k2 (g/mg. min) . | qe (calc) (mg/g) . | R2 . |
29.8 | 0.0015 | 32.57 | 0.9783 | 0.00022 | 3.33 | 0.8963 |
Pseudo-first-order linear kinetic plot for ammonia nitrogen adsorption.
Pseudo-second-order linear kinetic plot for ammonia nitrogen adsorption.
Intra-particle model linear kinetic plot for ammonia nitrogen adsorption.
The intra-particle diffusion model showed that the adsorption process of ammonia nitrogen was composed of three stages: ammonia nitrogen first spreads rapidly to the activated carbon surface then diffused into the internal pores, and finally entered the interior of the activated carbon and reduced the pore size. The fitted straight line in Figure 20 deviated from the origin confirming that the adsorption mechanism of ammonia nitrogen onto activated carbon was complicated. The results are presented in Table 7 together with correlation coefficient (R2) value.
Kinetic parameters for intra-particle adsorption rate expressions
Intra-particle model . | |
---|---|
kp (g/mg.min1/2) . | R2 . |
2.1914 | 0.8774 |
Intra-particle model . | |
---|---|
kp (g/mg.min1/2) . | R2 . |
2.1914 | 0.8774 |
Adsorption isotherms
Isotherm parameters for the removal of ammonia nitrogen
. | . | . | . | Constants . | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Isotherms . | Temperature . | Slope . | Intercept . | qm (mg/g) . | KL (L/mg) . | R2 . |
Langmuir | 20 | 0.085 | 0.138 | 11.710 | 7.231 | 0.997 |
30 | 0.087 | 0.239 | 11.442 | 4.177 | 0.939 | |
40 | 0.110 | 0.294 | 9.132 | 3.401 | 0.972 | |
. | . | Slope . | Intercept . | n (mg/g) . | KF (L/mg) . | R2 . |
Freundlich | 20 | 0.210 | 0.778 | 4.773 | 5.995 | 0.789 |
30 | 0.234 | 0.772 | 4.272 | 5.920 | 0.765 | |
40 | 0.244 | 0.671 | 4.105 | 4.684 | 0.782 |
. | . | . | . | Constants . | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Isotherms . | Temperature . | Slope . | Intercept . | qm (mg/g) . | KL (L/mg) . | R2 . |
Langmuir | 20 | 0.085 | 0.138 | 11.710 | 7.231 | 0.997 |
30 | 0.087 | 0.239 | 11.442 | 4.177 | 0.939 | |
40 | 0.110 | 0.294 | 9.132 | 3.401 | 0.972 | |
. | . | Slope . | Intercept . | n (mg/g) . | KF (L/mg) . | R2 . |
Freundlich | 20 | 0.210 | 0.778 | 4.773 | 5.995 | 0.789 |
30 | 0.234 | 0.772 | 4.272 | 5.920 | 0.765 | |
40 | 0.244 | 0.671 | 4.105 | 4.684 | 0.782 |
Langmuir linear adsorption isotherm for adsorption of ammonia nitrogen at 20 °C.
Langmuir linear adsorption isotherm for adsorption of ammonia nitrogen at 20 °C.
Langmuir linear adsorption isotherm for adsorption of ammonia nitrogen at 30 °C.
Langmuir linear adsorption isotherm for adsorption of ammonia nitrogen at 30 °C.
Langmuir linear adsorption isotherm for adsorption of ammonia nitrogen at 40 °C.
Langmuir linear adsorption isotherm for adsorption of ammonia nitrogen at 40 °C.
Freundlich linear adsorption isotherm for adsorption of ammonia nitrogen at 20 °C.
Freundlich linear adsorption isotherm for adsorption of ammonia nitrogen at 20 °C.
Freundlich linear adsorption isotherm for adsorption of ammonia nitrogen at 30 °C.
Freundlich linear adsorption isotherm for adsorption of ammonia nitrogen at 30 °C.
Freundlich linear adsorption isotherm for adsorption of ammonia nitrogen at 40 °C.
Freundlich linear adsorption isotherm for adsorption of ammonia nitrogen at 40 °C.
Thermodynamic studies
Thermodynamic parameters
T (K) . | 1/T (1/K) . | KL . | In KL . | ΔG° (J/mol) . | ΔH° (J/K.mol) . | ΔS° (J/K) . |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
293 | 0.00341 | 7.23 | 1.98 | −4,819,22 | −28,884,50 | −82.56 |
303 | 0.00330 | 4.18 | 1.43 | −3,601,41 | ||
313 | 0.00319 | 3.40 | 1.22 | −3,185,65 |
T (K) . | 1/T (1/K) . | KL . | In KL . | ΔG° (J/mol) . | ΔH° (J/K.mol) . | ΔS° (J/K) . |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
293 | 0.00341 | 7.23 | 1.98 | −4,819,22 | −28,884,50 | −82.56 |
303 | 0.00330 | 4.18 | 1.43 | −3,601,41 | ||
313 | 0.00319 | 3.40 | 1.22 | −3,185,65 |
Comparative study
CONCLUSION
In this study, the adsorption of ammonium nitrogen using waste tyre-activated carbon from the wastewater solution has been studied in batch experiments. The results showed that the optimal conditions for the efficient adsorption of ammonia nitrogen onto waste tyre-activated carbon were found as follows: an adsorbent dosage of 0.4 g/L, pH of 9, temperature of 20 °C, contact time of 90 min and initial ammonium nitrogen concentration of 50 mg/L. The adsorption kinetics are best described by a pseudo-second-order model. The Langmuir isotherm was found to provide the best fit for the experimental data. The negative values of ΔH° indicate that the adsorption of ammonia nitrogen onto waste tyre-activated carbon was exothermic, negative values of ΔG° showed the spontaneous nature of the process and positive values of ΔS° reflect an increase in randomness.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
We are sincerely grateful to the reviewers and the editor for their useful comments that have helped us to improve the quality of our study.
DATA AVAILABILITY STATEMENT
All relevant data are included in the paper or its Supplementary Information.
CONFLICT OF INTEREST
The authors declare there is no conflict.