Abstract
In this study, calcium alginate (Ca-Alg) beads were mixed with leonardite powder to prepare leonardite-embedded calcium alginate (Leo-Ca-Alg) beads. The prepared Leo-Ca-Alg beads were utilized for the adsorption of the Safranin-O dye. Leo-Ca-Alg beads were characterized by X-ray diffraction, Fourier transform infrared, and scanning electron microscopy before and after the adsorption process. The effects of pH, adsorbent dose, initial dye concentration, and contact time on the adsorption of Safranin-O dye onto Leo-Ca-Alg beads were investigated. The optimal condition was achieved at a pH value of 8.0, an adsorbent amount of 20 g/L, an initial concentration of 10 mg/L, and a contact time of 120 min. Under optimum conditions, 98.91% dye removal efficiency was obtained. Besides, the isotherm, kinetic, and thermodynamic were studied for the adsorption process. Accordingly, the removal of Safranin-O dye by the Leo-Ca-Alg adsorbent can be defined by the Freundlich model and described by the Elovich model and the second-order kinetic model at concentrations of 10 and 20–30 mg/L, respectively. The Safranin-O removal by Leo-Ca-Alg was feasible and naturally spontaneous. In reuse cycle studies, it was tried up to 10 reuses and decreased from 98.91 to 83.01% in the 10th use.
HIGHLIGHTS
A novel leonardite-embedded calcium alginate beads adsorbent was prepared.
Safranin-O was removed using the prepared adsorbent with an efficiency of 98.91%.
The Safranin-O removal by leonardite-embedded calcium alginate was feasible and naturally spontaneous.
The adsorbent was successfully utilized for 10 cycles.
INTRODUCTION
Water pollution has become one of the most critical issues due to the unprecedented growth in industrialization (Mashkoor & Nasar 2020a), which discharges several pollutant types into the water bodies without any treatment (Abd-alla & Aly 1991; Mashkoor & Nasar 2020b). Dyes pollution is one of the most common types, which affects water quality even if it is found in trace concentrations (Anbia et al. 2010; Chanpiwat et al. 2015). Dyes have several properties such as high solubility in water, seldom biodegradable, and toxicity, which make the polluted water to disturb human health, aquatic living organisms, and the visual appearance of water (Kenawy et al. 2022). Barizão et al. (2020) stated that the effects of the dye on humans range from skin diseases to cancer (de Lima Barizão et al. 2020). All over the world, 7,105 tons were annually produced, and 2% of these amounts were discharged into the environment by different industrial sectors (Ip et al. 2009). The leading industries in dye consumption and discharging are textile, nutrition, leather tanning, paper, paints, light-harvesting solar cells, and photo electrochemical cells (Roy & Saha 2021). The cationic Safranin-O dye is one of the most widely used (Bensalah et al. 2021).
Safranin-O dye has a rubicund brown colour and enters distinct industries such as food colouring, cotton colouring, fibres, homespun, silk, flashing, and sheet (Ahmad et al. 2015, 2016; Adegoke et al. 2017; Ojo et al. 2019; Pham et al. 2019). Hence, Safranin-O removal from industrial effluents is of prime interest. The treatment of dye wastewater is an urgent issue to protect the environment and humans. Thus, many researchers examined the chemicals, physical, and biological methods in dye-contaminated wastewater treatment (Ngoc et al. 2022). For example, coagulation, sedimentation, adsorption, oxidative degradation (Liu et al. 2021), flotation, photocatalysis, electrochemical treatment, and membrane filtration methods were employed to achieve this goal (Somsesta et al. 2020). Adsorption has been favoured because of its simplicity and high efficiency (Duman et al. 2020). Other reasons like low cost, approximately no sludge generation, and speed gave the adsorption unique advantages (Crini 2006; Burakov et al. 2018; Adel et al. 2021).
Even though the application of cost-effective treatment methods for wastewater is an urgent issue, the adsorbent material selection is just as important. In this study, calcium alginate bead was selected as an absorbent material because of its availability, affordability, biodegradability, and hydrophilicity (Fiol et al. 2005; Gok & Aytas 2009; Li et al. 2013). Besides, alginate is acknowledged as a non-hazardous matter that vehemently tolerates a natural polymer (Bedade et al. 2019). The linear polysaccharide family that contained 1, 4-linked β-d-mannuronic (M) with R-l-glucuronic (G) acid residues with a random arrangement along the chain is called alginic acid or alginate. The solubility of alginate depends on the ion's valent. Accordingly, alginates are soluble with monovalent ions (alkali metals and ammonium), but insoluble with divalent or polyvalent metal ions (except Mg2+) (Fourest & Volesky 1996). Alginates can form cross-linked gel beads as the monovalent/multivalent ions exchange occurs (Yang et al. 2016). The most common cross-linking ion is calcium (Li et al. 2013). Alginate exchanges the sodium with calcium to form a net of cross-linked chains with an egg box shape. The interaction between calcium and two carboxyl groups provides thermal resistance and cracking prevention properties (Hu et al. 2017). Calcium alginate beads were used to remove different pollutants with high treatment efficiencies. Araujo et al. (2020) utilized calcium alginate beads and Saccharomyces cerevisiae for biosorption of 241Am. In another research, the removal of U(VI) by an amidoximated-modified calcium alginate gel bead with entrapped functionalized SiO nanoparticles was achieved (Khajavi et al. 2021). Other pollutants such as acetaminophen (de Araújo et al. 2022), difenoconazole and nitenpyram (Zhou et al. 2022), azo dye and hexavalent chromium (Bilici et al. 2019), Cu(II), Pb(II), Mg(II), and Fe(II) (Abou-Zeid et al. 2021) were also removed by alginate beads.
Leonardite is a natural low coal matter that is formed around lignite mines and has a similar structure to lignite (Ozuzun & Uzal 2021). Leonardite has higher oxygen content than lignite because leonardite contains large quantities of carboxyl and phenolic groups in its matrix (Ricca et al. 1993). Both materials have humic/fulvic materials making them suitable as shear thinning additives, obliging significantly in clay particles' swelling control, viscosity lowering, and filtration management (Apostolidou et al. 2022). Humic-based materials were employed previously as natural adsorbents for heavy metal removal (Mohan & Chander 2006; Chammui et al. 2014; Meng et al. 2017). Leonardite shows promising potential to be used as an inexpensive adsorbent as it is a naturally abundant material (Meng et al. 2021). According to previous studies, the functional groups and the carboxyl properties increase the adsorption capacity (Shi et al. 2018). A novel green adsorbent was prepared by leonardite-embedded calcium alginate (Leo-Ca-Alg) beads. The removal of Safranin-O by the prepared Leo-Ca-Alg was assessed, optimized, and the reusability was investigated.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Chemicals
The source of leonardite was the district of Kahramanmaraş, Turkey. All the chemicals were acquired from Sigma-Aldrich. For bead preparation, sodium alginate (Alg) and calcium chloride dehydrate (CaCl2•2H2O) were used. Safranin-O powder was dissolved in distilled water (1 g for 1 L) to make an adsorbate stock solution. The properties of Safranin-O are presented in Table 1. The pH values of solutions were changed by employing sodium hydroxide (NaOH, 0.1 M) and hydrochloric acid (HCl, 0.1 M).
Dye name . | Chemical structure . | M.W (g/mole) and formula . | CAS number . | pKa . | Max. wavelength λmax (nm) . |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Safranin-O | 350.85 C20H19ClN4 | 477-73-6 | 11.0 | 520 |
Dye name . | Chemical structure . | M.W (g/mole) and formula . | CAS number . | pKa . | Max. wavelength λmax (nm) . |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Safranin-O | 350.85 C20H19ClN4 | 477-73-6 | 11.0 | 520 |
Preparation of Leo-Ca-Alg
To prepare the Na-Alg solution (2% w/v), 2 g of Na-Alg powder was dissolved in 100 mL deionized water and stirred for 2 h. Subsequently, 6 g leonardite (based on preliminary experiments) was mixed into the prepared solution until a homogeneous consistency was achieved (approximately 5 min). Then, the prepared Leo-Na-Alg solution was added dropwise into the CaCl2 solution via a dropper to produce Leo-Ca-Alg beads. The obtained Leo-Ca-Alg beads were kept in the solution overnight and dried in an oven at 60 °C for 1 h.
Adsorption experiments
Kinetic experiments
Isotherms
Thermodynamic study
Adsorbent characterization
The prepared Leo-Ca-Alg beads were characterized to study the adsorption effects. In addition, pure Ca-Alg beads were characterized to see the difference between leonardite beads. The Leo-Ca-Alg beads were drıed for 30 h at a temperature of 60 °C before the characterization step. The changes in the morphologies of Leo-Ca-Alg beads and Ca-Alg beads were identified via scanning electron microscopy (SEM; FEI, Quanta 650 Field Emission). The chemicals present at the Leo-Ca-Alg surface were scanned using energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy. The functional groups present at the adsorbent surface were scanned using Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR; FT/IR-6700, Jasco) for the bands 450–4,000 cm−1. X-ray diffraction (XRD; Panalytical Empyrean) was performed to determine the phases of the beads.
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
Characterization of bare and Leo-Ca-Alg beads
The effect of pH on adsorption of Safranin-O dye using Leo-Ca-Alg beads
Effect of Leo-Ca-Alg beads dose on adsorption of Safranin-O dye
Contact time effects on the adsorption
Reuse stability of Leo-Ca-Alg beads
Adsorption kinetics and isotherms
The kinetics study of the samples was carried out at different time intervals using pseudo-first-order, pseudo-second-order, and Elovich models. The pseudo-first-order model assumes that the dye removal is related to the diffusion force that depends on the differences in the solute concentrations. Also, the model interprets a linear proportion between the uptake and the difference in the saturation concentration, which is applicable just in the early steps of adsorption. In contrast, the pseudo-second-order kinetic model can predict the whole range of the adsorption process by the assumption of rate-liming steps as chemical sorption. For this model, the dominant factor affecting the adsorption rate is the adsorption capacity, not the dye concentration. The Elovich kinetic model utilizes the pseudo-second-order, supposing that the surface of the adsorbents is energetically heterogeneous (Lagergren 1898; Elovich & Larinov 1962; Ho et al. 1996; Saleh et al. 2022).
Table 2 presents the model-derived kinetic parameters and the statistical results. Accordingly, the three kinetic models had high correlation coefficients over the three concentrations. The adsorption at the lowest concentration (i.e. 10 mg/L) can be described by the Elovich model because it had the highest correlation coefficient and lowest chi-square error. However, the pseudo-second-order model described the adsorption at concentrations of 20 and 30 mg/L for the same reasons.
Safranin-O . | 10 mg/L . | 20 mg/L . | 30 mg/L . |
---|---|---|---|
First-order model | |||
qe.(mg/g) | 0.487 ± 0.021 | 0.885 ± 0.027 | 1.259 ± 0.037 |
k1 (1/min) | 0.094 ± 0.023 | 0.038 ± 0.004 | 0.031 ± 0.003 |
X2Red. | 0.002 | 0.001 | 0.002 |
R2 | 0.938 | 0.989 | 0.992 |
Second-order model | |||
qe (mg/g) | 0.548 ± 0.019 | 1.085 ± 0.040 | 1.606 ± 0.075 |
k2 (g/mg min) | 0.230 ± 0.048 | 0.038 ± 0.006 | 0.019 ± 0.003 |
X2Red. | 5.97e-04 | 7.14e-04 | 0.002 |
R2Adj. | 0.981 | 0.993 | 0.992 |
Elovich model | |||
a (mg/g·min) | 0.220 ± 0.023 | 0.069 ± 0.011 | 0.066 ± 0.011 |
b (g/mg) | 10.353 ± 0.291 | 3.722 ± 0.338 | 2.299 ± 0.250 |
X2Red. | 4.07e-5 | 0.001 | 0.003 |
R2Adj. | 0.998 | 0.989 | 0.987 |
Safranin-O . | 10 mg/L . | 20 mg/L . | 30 mg/L . |
---|---|---|---|
First-order model | |||
qe.(mg/g) | 0.487 ± 0.021 | 0.885 ± 0.027 | 1.259 ± 0.037 |
k1 (1/min) | 0.094 ± 0.023 | 0.038 ± 0.004 | 0.031 ± 0.003 |
X2Red. | 0.002 | 0.001 | 0.002 |
R2 | 0.938 | 0.989 | 0.992 |
Second-order model | |||
qe (mg/g) | 0.548 ± 0.019 | 1.085 ± 0.040 | 1.606 ± 0.075 |
k2 (g/mg min) | 0.230 ± 0.048 | 0.038 ± 0.006 | 0.019 ± 0.003 |
X2Red. | 5.97e-04 | 7.14e-04 | 0.002 |
R2Adj. | 0.981 | 0.993 | 0.992 |
Elovich model | |||
a (mg/g·min) | 0.220 ± 0.023 | 0.069 ± 0.011 | 0.066 ± 0.011 |
b (g/mg) | 10.353 ± 0.291 | 3.722 ± 0.338 | 2.299 ± 0.250 |
X2Red. | 4.07e-5 | 0.001 | 0.003 |
R2Adj. | 0.998 | 0.989 | 0.987 |
Multi-linearity in the figure indicated that film diffusion contributed to adsorption. In addition, none of the lines crossed the origin point, indicating that pore diffusion alone does not contribute to rate control. The Bangham model results confirmed this mechanism (Table 3).
Safranin-O . | 10 ppm . | 20 ppm . | 30 ppm . |
---|---|---|---|
Kb | 1.146 ± 0.320 | 0.358 ± 0.050 | 0.266 ± 0.049 |
Α | 0.620 ± 0.095 | 0.737 ± 0.037 | 0.750 ± 0.047 |
X2Red. | 6.86e-4 | 5.07e-4 | 0.002 |
R2Adj. | 0.979 | 0.995 | 0.992 |
Safranin-O . | 10 ppm . | 20 ppm . | 30 ppm . |
---|---|---|---|
Kb | 1.146 ± 0.320 | 0.358 ± 0.050 | 0.266 ± 0.049 |
Α | 0.620 ± 0.095 | 0.737 ± 0.037 | 0.750 ± 0.047 |
X2Red. | 6.86e-4 | 5.07e-4 | 0.002 |
R2Adj. | 0.979 | 0.995 | 0.992 |
Adsorption isotherms relate adsorption capacity and adsorbate concentration at a constant temperature (Li et al. 2021). Because of liquid-phase adsorption complexity, there may not be a straightforward expression to illustrate the equilibrium adsorbent/adsorbate relationship. Therefore, Langmuir and Freundlich's models were used to describe the adsorption data. Table 4 shows the corresponding adsorption parameters derived from fitting data to the two isotherms. Based on the correlation coefficient values, the removal of Safranin-O dye by the Leo-Ca-Alg adsorbent can be defined by the Freundlich model. Accordingly, the adsorption ensues in a heterogeneous manner. Regarding the affinity factor value (n) emanated by the Freundlich isotherm, n located between 1 and 10 range isotherm revealed a high adsorbent adsorbate affinity (Tran et al. 2016).
Isotherm . | Parameter . | Value . |
---|---|---|
Langmuir | KL (L/mg) | 0.01809 ± 0.00635 |
Qmax (mg/g) | 3.43092 ± 0.84225 | |
X2Red. | 0.00134 | |
R2 | 0.98815 | |
Freundlich | Kf ((mg/g) (L/mg)1/n) | 0.09787 ± 0.00977 |
1/n | 0.73995 ± 0.03129 | |
X2Red. | 0.000319822 | |
R2 | 0.99717 |
Isotherm . | Parameter . | Value . |
---|---|---|
Langmuir | KL (L/mg) | 0.01809 ± 0.00635 |
Qmax (mg/g) | 3.43092 ± 0.84225 | |
X2Red. | 0.00134 | |
R2 | 0.98815 | |
Freundlich | Kf ((mg/g) (L/mg)1/n) | 0.09787 ± 0.00977 |
1/n | 0.73995 ± 0.03129 | |
X2Red. | 0.000319822 | |
R2 | 0.99717 |
Adsorption thermodynamic
The thermodynamic parameters for the adsorption of Safranin-O onto the prepared Leo-Ca-Alg beads were specified at various temperatures (25, 30, and 35 °C). Table 5 shows the Gibbs free energy, enthalpy, and entropy.
T (°C) . | ΔH (kJ/mole) . | ΔS (J/mole·K) . | ΔG° (kJ/mole) . |
---|---|---|---|
25 | −176.5977 | −562.2259 | −9.054 |
30 | −6.243 | ||
35 | −3.432 |
T (°C) . | ΔH (kJ/mole) . | ΔS (J/mole·K) . | ΔG° (kJ/mole) . |
---|---|---|---|
25 | −176.5977 | −562.2259 | −9.054 |
30 | −6.243 | ||
35 | −3.432 |
The enthalpy change for the Safranin-O adsorption onto the prepared Leo-Ca-Alg beads was −176.60 kJ/mol. The adsorption can be typed as exothermic as the change in enthalpy was negative. The change in the entropy reached −562.23 J/mole·K. The negative sign indicated that the Leo-Alg-Ca bead's surface randomness decreased at the end of the adsorption process (Dawood et al. 2016). Equations (10)–(12) are used in Gibbs's free energy calculation. Accordingly, ΔG° for Safranin-O adsorption at the temperatures of 298, 303, and 308 K were −9.05, −6.24, and −3.43 kJ/mole, respectively (Table 4). According to the negative sign of the Gibbs free energy change, the Safranin-O removal by Leo-Ca-Alg was feasible and naturally spontaneous (Biswas et al. 2020). Gibbs's free values were less than 20 kJ/mole, which indicated the physisorption type (Saleh et al. 2020). However, the kinetic experiments results showed a contribution of the chemisorption type in Safranin-O removal. Thus, the adsorption may be not relying on just one mechanism.
Comparison with other adsorbents
The prepared Leo-Ca-Alg beads were compared with other adsorbents. Table 6 shows a brief comparison with other adsorbents.
Adsorbent . | Removal efficiency (%) . | Kinetic . | isotherm . | Thermodynamic . | Reusability . | Reference . |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Leo-Ca-Alg | 98.91 | Elovich and pseudo-second-order model | Freundlich | Spontaneous and exothermic | 10 cycles | This study |
Magnetite/Ag nanocomposite | 94 | Particle diffusion-controlled mechanism | Langmuir | Spontaneous and endothermic | 5 cycles | Salem et al. (2022) |
Tea waste powder | 93.7 | – | Freundlich | Spontaneous and exothermic | – | Nehaba et al. (2019) |
MgO decked multi-layered graphene | 98 | Pseudo-second-order model | Langmuir | – | 3 cycles | Rotte et al. (2014) |
Coconut coir | 98 | Pseudo-second-order model | Langmuir and Temkin | Spontaneous and exothermic | – | Ghosh et al. (2021) |
Adsorbent . | Removal efficiency (%) . | Kinetic . | isotherm . | Thermodynamic . | Reusability . | Reference . |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Leo-Ca-Alg | 98.91 | Elovich and pseudo-second-order model | Freundlich | Spontaneous and exothermic | 10 cycles | This study |
Magnetite/Ag nanocomposite | 94 | Particle diffusion-controlled mechanism | Langmuir | Spontaneous and endothermic | 5 cycles | Salem et al. (2022) |
Tea waste powder | 93.7 | – | Freundlich | Spontaneous and exothermic | – | Nehaba et al. (2019) |
MgO decked multi-layered graphene | 98 | Pseudo-second-order model | Langmuir | – | 3 cycles | Rotte et al. (2014) |
Coconut coir | 98 | Pseudo-second-order model | Langmuir and Temkin | Spontaneous and exothermic | – | Ghosh et al. (2021) |
CONCLUSION
In this study, it was examined the effect of leonardite powder embedded in Ca-Alg beads on Safranin-O removal. The effects of solution pH, Leo-Cal-Alg quantity, dye concentration, and temperature were explored. The reusability of the prepared adsorbent was investigated. In the adsorption process, it showed the best removal efficiency (98.91%) under pH 8, 20 g/L leonardite beads, 10 mg/L initial dye concentration, and temperature conditions at 25 °C. Low removal efficiency (2%) was obtained when bare Ca-Alg beads were tested for adsorption on the Safranin-O dye. When the effect of the initial dye concentration of Safranin-O was examined, it was observed that the removal efficiency decreased with the increased concentration. In reuse cycle studies, it was tried up to 10 reuses and decreased from 98.91 to 83.01% in the 10th use.
AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS
Nihan Canan Ozdemir helped in investigation and data curation. Mohammed Saleh helped in writing – original draft and formal analysis. Zeynep Bilici helped in methodology. Hudaverdi Arslan helped in review and editing. Nadir Dizge helped in conceptualization, writing – original draft, and formal analysis. All authors commented on previous versions of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
DATA AVAILABILITY STATEMENT
All relevant data are included in the paper or its Supplementary Information.
CONFLICT OF INTEREST
The authors declare there is no conflict.