Abstract
MCM-48, which is particulate and nanoporous, was formulated to actively remove aniline (AN) (i.e., benzenamine) from wastewater. MCM-48 was characterized by several methods. It was found that the MCM-48 was highly active in adsorbing aniline from wastewater. The Langmuir, Freundlich, and Temkin isotherms were employed to evaluate the adsorption equilibrium. At 100 and 94 mg g−1, the maximum theoretical and experimental absorption of aniline, respectively, fit with a Type I Langmuir isotherm. The Langmuir model was optimal in comparison to the Freundlich model for the adsorption of AN onto the mesoporous material MCM-48. The results of these kinetics adsorption models were investigated using model kinetics that employed both pseudo-first- and pseudo-second-order models as well as models utilized intraparticle diffusion. The kinetics adsorption models demonstrated that the absorption was rapid and most closely agreed with the pseudo-first-order model. The kinetic studies and the adsorption isotherms revealed the presence of both physical adsorption and chemisorption. The potential adsorption mechanisms include the following: (1) hydrogen bonding, (2) π-π interactions, (3) electrostatic interaction, and (4) hydrophobic interactions. The solution's pH, ionic strength, and ambient temperature also played essential roles in the adsorption.
HIGHLIGHTS
The mesoporous silica MCM-48 was very successful to remove aniline.
A maximum aniline adsorption 94 mg/g was achieved on MCM48 adsorbent.
MCM-48 was found very active for the removal of aniline compounds from wastewater.
Aniline adsorption mechanism is a chemisorption and physical adsorption process.
The MCM-48 was regenerated and reused efficiently in a batch adsorption.
INTRODUCTION
Industries, including those in the food, pharmaceutical, petrochemical, chemical, pulp, electronics, and paper sectors, all create enormous amounts of waste discharges with considerable potential for recycling and remediation (Alardhi et al. 2020; Ali et al. 2023; Humadi et al. 2023; Muslim et al. 2023). In the paint, plastic, pesticide, dye, and intermediate industries of the chemical industries, aniline (C6H7N) is widely used (Ahmad & Tan 2004; Ali et al. 2022a; Jabbar et al. 2022; Abbood et al. 2023). Many serious environmental problems have been caused by wastewater containing aniline because of its carcinogenic properties and high toxicity. It is usually remediated by both physical and chemical techniques, including precipitation coagulation, filtration, ion exchange, ozonation, membrane, advanced oxidation processes, and adsorption (Goncharuk et al. 2002; Hirakawa et al. 2007). In addition, various types of adsorption methods have been employed to remove organic and inorganic contaminants from wastewater, with a variety of materials selected as the adsorbent.
Adsorption can be defined as a phenomenon where solutes or gases are sorbed by either liquid or solid surfaces as part of a mechanism for mass transmission. The molecules or atoms on the solid surface are adsorbed due to uneven forces because they have an abundance of surface energy (Hu & Xu 2020; Cabooter et al. 2021). Regenerating used adsorbent materials is costly and time-consuming (Al-Bastaki 2004). Therefore, research has sought novel adsorbents to eliminate contamination in wastewater (Morent et al. 2006), including silicate (Levec & Pintar 2007), mesoporous materials (Bhargava et al. 2007), and zeolites, either modified or unmodified (Ko et al. 2007). Zeolites act as an adsorbent material because they have the ability either to adsorb particular compounds or to prohibit such adsorption; they manage this as a result of the physical characteristics of the molecules (e.g., size, shape, and polarity). In addition, research on organ clays has demonstrated their ability to adsorb organic molecules from water.
For some applications, MCM-48 has produced good results (Al-Nayili et al. 2022). Current research has focused on mesoporous materials (i.e., MCM-41, MCM-48, and SBA-15) because of their potential use as catalysts, catalyst supports, and absorbents as well as in drug delivery, photocatalysis, and desulfurization (Atiyah et al. 2022a, 2022b). These materials have characteristic properties that include a volume of specific pores that can be as large as 1.2 cm3/g, with surface areas of 1,000–1,500 m2/g and pore sizes that are narrow, have high thermal stability, and are non-cytotoxic (Narita et al. 1985). MCM-48 and other mesoporous silica-based substances have been generated for various functions – as adsorbents, carriers of catalysts, and effective drug delivery systems (Taralkar et al. 2008). These mesoporous materials have substantial thermal stability, extensive surface areas, a porous morphology, and contain surfaces that are extremely reactive to silanol groups (Shaban et al. 2017; Pajchel & Kolodziejski 2018).
The present research sought to study how to optimally remove aniline (C6H7N) from wastewater with MCM-48 as the adsorbent. The effectiveness of this process was evaluated using adsorption kinetics and isotherms. Furthermore, a batch adsorption process was employed to investigate the mass transfer mechanism of aniline wastewater onto the MCM-48 surface adsorbent. Both desorption and regeneration kinetics were evaluated to determine the utility of the adsorbent and whether it could withstand being reused without impacting its performance.
EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN
Materials
This study used the surfactant cetyl trimethyl ammonium bromide (CTAB), with a purity greater than 98%; the silica source tetraethyl orthosilicate (TEOS), with a purity greater than 98%; hydrochloric acid (HCl); and sodium hydroxide (NaOH). All chemicals were purchased from Sigma Aldrich Chemical Company and used without modification.
MCM-48 preparation
MCM–48 was synthesized using the method delineated in Doyle & Hodnett (2003), Doyle et al. (2006) and Nejat et al. (2015). First, deionized water (90 g) was mixed with CTAB (10 g). Next, the solution was agitated at high speed and at 35 °C for 40 min, after which NaOH (1 g) was added. The mixture was stirred for 60 min at 35 °C before 11 cm3 of TEOS was added, after which the mixture continued to be stirred under the same conditions for an additional 30 min. The mixture was put into an autoclave for 24 h at a constant temperature (150 °C). Then, the prepared MCM-48 was cooled for 1 h, filtered, and rinsed with distilled H2O prior to being allowed to dry at room temperature. Next, the MCM-48 underwent calcination for 6 h. The temperature was increased to 650 °C at a ramp rate of 2 °C/min.
Characterization
EDAX and SEM analyses
An energy-dispersive X-ray analysis (EDAX) spectrometer was employed to determine the chemical composition during the experiments. It was paired with scanning electron microscopy (SEM; JEOL JSM-5600 LV) to make it more powerful.
X-ray diffraction (XRD)
A small-angle diffractometer (MiniFlex, Rigaku) was used to apply XRD to determine the phase identification of a crystalline material and unit cell dimensions. The instrument was used in ambient settings using Cu K radiation (λ = 1.5406 Å). At 40 kV and 30 mA, the 10 s step time was used to record data from an X-ray tube with a step size of 0.01 and a step time of 0.5–80. The unit cell was found using nλ = 2dsinθ, and the d-spacing was found using ɑo = 2d100/3.
BET and PSD analysis
A pore analyzer (Micrometrics ASAP 2020) used N2 physisorption to measure the adsorption and desorption of nitrogen at a temperature of –196 °C. A degassing procedure was carried out for 3 h on all specimens in the degas adsorption analyzer port at 350 °C and under vacuum (p < 10−5 mbar). Calculating the BET-specific surface area led to a relative pressure ranging from 0.05 to 0.25. To determine the pore size distributions, thermodynamics and the Barrett–Joyner–Halenda (BJH) method were used, based on the isotherm desorption branch. The total pore volume was found by observing the amount of liquid N2 adsorbed at the relative pressure (P/P0 = 0.995), based on the adsorption branch of the N2 isotherm. The thickness of the pore walls (tW) was assessed based on the unit cell parameter (ɑo) and pore size diameter (dP). Brunauer–Emmett–Teller (BET) analysis (4 V/A) was employed to determine the average mesopore sizes for each specimen based on the nitrogen sorption data.
FT-IR analysis
A Fourier-transform infrared (FT-IR) spectrometer (NICOLET 380) was used to measure the infrared spectra of the solid samples. They were found to range between 4,000 and 400 cm−1 in areas with a resolution of 4 cm−1 at room temperature.
Experiments of batch adsorption
Adsorption isotherm model
The value of RL indicates four possible conditions of the isotherm: (1) favorable (RL < 1), (2) unfavorable (RL > 1), (3) linear (RL = 1), or (4) irreversible (RL = 0) (Chen et al. 2010).
The Freundlich constants n and Kf represent the sorbent's capacity and the adsorption intensity, respectively. To evaluate n and Kf, the slope and intercept of the line associated with ln qe are compared with ln Ce.
Adsorption kinetics
The adsorbed aniline quantity at equilibrium time t is shown by qe and qt, respectively. The pseudo-first-order adsorption equilibrium rate has a constant, .
Mechanism and mass transfer
Reuse of the adsorbent
The MCM-48 adsorbent under investigation had been exhausted in order to study how well it would regenerate. After the aniline solution was absorbed onto the MCM-48, the solution was filtered, and the adsorbent material laden with aniline was well rinsed in water until all of the aniline was removed from the solution. Then, the aniline was dried in a vacuum at 60 °C overnight. The materials underwent a few adsorption–desorption cycles to evaluate the MCM-48's ability to regenerate as well as its resilience.
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
Characterization of the adsorbent
Sample . | SBET (m2/g) . | VP (cm3/g) . | VμP (cm3/g) . | DP (nm) . | ɑo (nm) . | twall (nm) . |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MCM-48 | 1,400 | 1.3 | 0.4 | 3 | 3.5 | 0.6 |
Sample . | SBET (m2/g) . | VP (cm3/g) . | VμP (cm3/g) . | DP (nm) . | ɑo (nm) . | twall (nm) . |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MCM-48 | 1,400 | 1.3 | 0.4 | 3 | 3.5 | 0.6 |
Aniline adsorption
Effect of the agitation speed
To study the adsorption of the contaminated solution, the contact time and solution concentration were held constant while the agitation velocity was altered from 0 to 200 rpm. More contaminants were removed when the agitation velocity increased from 0 to 150 rpm, after which the removal did not change. Hence, if the agitation velocity ranges from 150 to 200 rpm, the cationic sites in the pores of the MCM-48 will be readily available for absorption. Thus, 150 rpm was determined to be the optimal agitation speed for further studies (Temkin & Pyzhev 1940).
Effect of the pH
Concentration effect
Adsorption isotherm
The adsorption isotherm profiles for aniline fit the Langmuir Type I adsorption model; the quantity adsorbed rose gradually until it reached values in the 34–94 mg/g range (Ali et al. 2022b). Adsorption isotherms have been studied in order to model adsorption behavior. Therefore, Figure 5(a)–5(c) displays the Langmuir, Freundlich, and Temkin isotherm models in order to evaluate the process of aniline adsorption. Table 2 provides the regression coefficients, showing R2 values of 0.99. Such a high correlation coefficient indicates that there is a strong agreement between the parameters. Figure 5(b) employs the Langmuir model to produce a straight line, indicating Type I adsorption of the aniline. When adsorbed, aniline may produce monolayers as large as 100 mg/g, based on the constant qmax. Additionally, aniline has an adsorption energy constant, KL, of 0.25 dm3/mg. Table 2 lists the equilibrium parameter (RL) values based on the Langmuir isotherm model, showing that all RL values were greater than 0 but less than 1, which signifies that the Langmuir isotherm is favorable (Chen et al. 2010).
Adsorbate . | Langmuir constants . | Freundlich constants . | Temkin constants . | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Qmax (mg/g) . | KL (dm3 mg−1) . | R2 . | RL . | 1/n . | KF . | R2 . | bT . | Ln KT . | R2 . | |
Aniline | 100 | 0.25 | 0.9972 | 0.45 | 0.0578 | 74.079 | 0.9929 | 117.7 | 0.047 | 0.9109 |
Adsorbate . | Langmuir constants . | Freundlich constants . | Temkin constants . | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Qmax (mg/g) . | KL (dm3 mg−1) . | R2 . | RL . | 1/n . | KF . | R2 . | bT . | Ln KT . | R2 . | |
Aniline | 100 | 0.25 | 0.9972 | 0.45 | 0.0578 | 74.079 | 0.9929 | 117.7 | 0.047 | 0.9109 |
As shown in Figure 5(c), the data were also matched to the Freundlich equation, with Table 2 specifying the constants of regression. As stated above, the correlation coefficient values validate the Langmuir equation as an extremely close fit, making it a better model than either the Freundlich or the Temkin to describe aniline adsorption on mesoporous materials. Furthermore, aniline is highly adsorbable, as shown by it having 1/n values that are less than 1 (Albayati & Doyle 2014a). The final model (i.e., Temkin) is exhibited in Figure 5(d), with any relevant adsorption parameters listed in Table 2.
Adsorption kinetics
The rate of aniline adsorption is a key factor in its effectiveness. Both pseudo-first- and pseudo-second-order model (Kadhum et al. 2022) as well as intraparticle diffusion model were employed to elucidate the kinetics of AN adsorption, which can be seen in Figure 6(b)–6(d), respectively. The kinetic model variables are displayed in Table 3, where R2 represents the correlation coefficient. Table 3 demonstrates that the theoretical values (qe) from the pseudo-first-order kinetic model provided significantly dissimilar values than those found in the experiment (qe exp.). Therefore, this adsorption system can be well described by the pseudo-first-order kinetic model, as shown in Figure 6(b). In contrast, the results presented in Table 3 show identical theoretical and experimental values (i.e., qe cal. and qe exp.) for the pseudo-second-order kinetic model. The coefficients' R2 values approached 1, providing additional confirmation for describing the results by using the pseudo-second-order equation. As far as the adsorption mechanism is concerned, the pseudo-first-order hypothesis appears to be robust, especially as the regression coefficients are so close to 1 (0.9948) (Kadhum et al. 2021).
Adsorbates . | qe exp. (mg/g) . | Pseudo-first order constants . | Pseudo-second-order constants . | Intraparticle diffusion constants . | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
qe cal. (mg/g) . | K1 (g/mg min) . | R2 . | qe cal. (mg/g) . | K2 (g/mg min) . | R2 . | Kid (mg/g min0.5) . | R2 . | ||
Aniline | 94 | 139 | 0.0186 | 0.9948 | 169 | 1.3266*10−4 | 0.9927 | 5.7 | 0.83 |
Adsorbates . | qe exp. (mg/g) . | Pseudo-first order constants . | Pseudo-second-order constants . | Intraparticle diffusion constants . | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
qe cal. (mg/g) . | K1 (g/mg min) . | R2 . | qe cal. (mg/g) . | K2 (g/mg min) . | R2 . | Kid (mg/g min0.5) . | R2 . | ||
Aniline | 94 | 139 | 0.0186 | 0.9948 | 169 | 1.3266*10−4 | 0.9927 | 5.7 | 0.83 |
As presented in Figure 6(d), the experimental results were compared to the intraparticle diffusion model using Equation (9) to understand the mechanisms and rate-controlling processes that had occurred. The calculations of that used the slope of the second stage line are displayed in Table 3, which lists a value of 5.7 mg/g min0.5 with a determination coefficient (R2) of 0.83. The appearance of the horizontal dotted line in Figure 6(d) indicates that the AN ion in the third region underwent an extremely slow uptake due to the equilibrium adsorption (Ali et al. 2022c).
Adsorption mechanism
Mass transfer models
This study presents the initial stage in analyzing the mass transfer of surface adsorption to predict the properties of MCM-48 adsorbents and surface adsorption. Table 4 shows the mass transfer models used (i.e., WM and BB) to evaluate the surface adsorption of dye molecules onto the adsorbent (Alorabi & Azizi 2023).
Intraparticle diffusion . | Bangham and Burt . | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
I . | Kp (mg/g min0.5( . | R2 . | Kb (mL/g L) . | α . | R2 . |
44.3 | 5.7 | 0.83 | 0.0128 | 0.0434 | 0.9421 |
Intraparticle diffusion . | Bangham and Burt . | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
I . | Kp (mg/g min0.5( . | R2 . | Kb (mL/g L) . | α . | R2 . |
44.3 | 5.7 | 0.83 | 0.0128 | 0.0434 | 0.9421 |
Adsorbent reuse
Comparative study
MCM-48 is compared with other adsorbents in Table 5, providing information about MCM-48's effectiveness as an adsorbent that might be able to increase aniline adsorption by adding other materials. Used without modification, the adsorption capability of MCM-48 was 94 mg/g for aniline. However, if a functional group was added to the MCM-48's surface, its adsorption capacity should increase. Overall, MCM-48 is an optimal adsorbent for aniline dye removal due to its large surface area that can reach 1,400 m2/g (see Table 5).
No. . | Adsorbents . | Adsorption Capacity Qmax (mg/g) . | References . |
---|---|---|---|
1 | AC | 40.65 | Liu et al. (2015) |
2 | ACS | 78.13 | Yi et al. (2020) |
ACS/GO | 136.98 | ||
3 | PS-HQ-HCP | 210.9 | Wang et al. (2023) |
PS-CA-HCP | 167.4 | ||
PS-rE-HCP | 160.9 | ||
4 | SBA-15 | 163.7 | Koyuncu & Kul (2019) |
5 | NAC3 | 125.3 | Chen et al. (2017) |
6 | MCM-48 | 94 | This work |
No. . | Adsorbents . | Adsorption Capacity Qmax (mg/g) . | References . |
---|---|---|---|
1 | AC | 40.65 | Liu et al. (2015) |
2 | ACS | 78.13 | Yi et al. (2020) |
ACS/GO | 136.98 | ||
3 | PS-HQ-HCP | 210.9 | Wang et al. (2023) |
PS-CA-HCP | 167.4 | ||
PS-rE-HCP | 160.9 | ||
4 | SBA-15 | 163.7 | Koyuncu & Kul (2019) |
5 | NAC3 | 125.3 | Chen et al. (2017) |
6 | MCM-48 | 94 | This work |
CONCLUSIONS
MCM-48, a mesoporous material, was able to effectively adsorb aniline from an aqueous solution and is thereby recommended for such use. The R2 values of 0.99 demonstrated that aniline molecules fit with Type I Langmuir adsorption. Because the Langmuir adsorption isotherm best fits the experimental data, it can be assumed that the experiment showed a homogeneous surface with monolayer adsorption. The Langmuir isotherm calculated the theoretical adsorption capacity to be 100 mg/g and the experimental maximal adsorption capacity to be 94 mg/g. Therefore, this pseudo-first-order model can predict the adsorption dynamics of this system. Additionally, the adsorption isotherms and kinetics models demonstrate that both chemical and physical adsorption occurred within this adsorption mechanism.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
The authors would like to express their gratitude to the Chemical Engineering Department at the University of Technology in Iraq, the Materials Engineering Department at Mustansiriyah University's College of Engineering in Baghdad, Iraq, and the Department of Chemical and Petroleum Industries Engineering at Al-Mustaqbal University College in Babylon, Iraq.
AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS
N. S. and T. M. conceptualized the whole article, developed the methodology, investigated the process, rendered support in data curation, and wrote the original draft; I. K. wrote the review and edited the article, and supervised the work; D. J. conceptualized the whole article, supervised the work, wrote the review and edited the article.
FUNDING
Not applicable.
DATA AVAILABILITY STATEMENT
All relevant data are included in the paper or its Supplementary Information.
CONFLICT OF INTEREST
The authors declare there is no conflict.