The study presents an assessment of groundwater vulnerability due to heavy-metal contamination using Heavy Metal Pollution and Contamination Index of Urban Aligarh. Globally, hazardous compounds in industrially contaminated sites are pressing and high-priority issue. A detailed risk assessment was carried out to determine the potential health hazards linked to locations that were recently polluted. A total of 17 groundwater samples were taken from hand-pump and 20 industrial drainage samples were collected from selected areas of Aligarh. The concentration of heavy-metals in the collected samples analyzed were shown on maps using ArcGIS software and interpreted for Heavy Metal Pollution Index (HPIx) and Contamination Index (CDx). These analyzed values were subsequently compared with the permissible limits established by the agencies like EPA, WHO, and BIS. The mean concentration of heavy-metals in groundwater of different locations was observed as follows particular sequence: Ni (1.40), Cu (0.58), Zn (0.06), Fe (0.08), Mn (0.04), Cr (0.001), Pb (0.00025) mg/l. Additionally in industrial effluent, Cr (18.3), Ni (13.34), Mn (1.16), Cu (1.99), Pb (1.2), Fe (6.3), Zn (0.51) mg/l. According to HPIx, the analysis reveals 64.7%, of visited areas belonged to have safe groundwater. Conversely, a smaller proportion, 35.3%, was found falling into heavy metal-polluted group.

  • The study provides a comprehensive assessment of heavy metal contamination.

  • GIS-driven vulnerability mapping is conducted in the study.

  • The study includes an evaluation of real-world impact.

  • The study systematically validates scientific indices for accuracy and reliability.

  • The study investigates health effects resulting from heavy metal contamination.

  • A comprehensive analysis of drinking water quality.

In this anthropocene era, deterioration in groundwater quality has garnered much attention from researchers worldwide. The major reason behind degrading water quality may be undoubtedly attributed to increasing industrialization and expanding urbanization (AInyinbor Adejumoke & Toyin 2018). For restoring ecosystem and benefit of mankind, it is necessary to protect the available groundwater reserves by undertaking all possible measures to prevent any further contamination. Generally, there exist two prime causes for groundwater vulnerability, either natural or anthropogenic. Natural factors comprise of hydrogeological conditions, soil parameters, seawater intrusion, etc. while the anthropogenic factors include overabstraction, effluent discharge from wastewater treatment plants, unlimited use of fertilizers, mining activity, waste dumps, industrial waste, etc. Among the anthropogenic factors, effluents from industrial outlets are the major source of groundwater pollution. Furthermore, few industries such as leather industry, textile industry, electroplating industry, and mining industry discharge wastes containing excessive organics as well as inorganic impurities containing specifically heavy metals.

In our ecosystem, a total of 35 metals exist, 23 of which are categorized as heavy metals. The presence of these heavy metals in drinking water, soil, or food can pose significant risks to human health, whether through the food chain or other pathways. Notable examples of these heavy metals include arsenic (As), lead (Pb), copper (Cu), chromium (Cr), manganese (Mn), iron (Fe), nickel (Ni), and more. Heavy metals are defined by their high atomic weight (ranging from 63.5 to 200.6) and high density (exceeding 5) (Bazrafshan et al. 2015). The solubility of these heavy metals in water at different pH conditions further complicates the issue. Moreover, these inorganic pollutants are mostly non-biodegradable and might enter the food chain and accumulate in the living organism, resulting in serious environmental problems (Hunsom et al. 2005). Intake of these heavy metals through water exceed their permissible limits is known to cause serious human health issues. Therefore, these heavy metals need to be removed from drinking water supplies exceeding permissible limits. Recently various methods have been used to remove heavy metals from water and wastewater including chemical precipitation, membrane filtration, floatation, ion-exchange absorption, electrocoagulation, etc. (Niu et al. 2023).

In past years, several incidents were reported all over the world due to heavy metal toxicity and poisoning. Several case studies also exist where industrial accidents and tragedies happened linked to heavy metal poisoning of available water reservoirs affecting humans as Frailes mine, Aznacollor, Spain, which was later called the Donana disaster, in which 5 million cubic metres of acid wastewater and toxic sludge containing heavy metals such as lead, arsenic, and zinc dropped into the river Agrio, which continued to the Guadiamar River. Gaudiamar is the main water source for the Donana National Park. Various agricultural land, pastureland, woodland, river areas, and marshland alongside the Guadiamar River were affected. The matter came into light when sudden death of wildlife and aquatic life in large numbers (Pain et al. 1998). Thus, concerning such issues so as to avoid such tragedies periodic water quality assessment or examination is required so as to determine whether the available water from the referred-to reliable sources is safe from such toxic metals for drinking and other purposes.

The main objective of this study was to assess groundwater quality pertaining to heavy metals. Besides, the role of industries influents on contaminating groundwater quality in the urban Aligarh was also explored and investigated for any correlation if there. GIS-based maps were plotted for the assessment of groundwater vulnerability to heavy metal contamination via water quality pollution indices.

The study areas lie in Aligarh as shown in Figure 1, located at coordinates 27°54′1.37″ N, 78°4′20.211″ E is a fast-developing city in northern India near the capital, New Delhi, covering an area of approximately 40 km2. Aligarh is situated in the middle of the land between the Ganges and Yamuna rivers, in the low-lying region. During the monsoon season, Aligarh experiences a humid subtropical climate, with July being the wettest month, receiving an average of 760 mm of precipitation per year. The highest recorded temperature in the area is 47 °C, while the lowest temperature can reach 20 °C. The typical daily humidity in Aligarh is 62.25% during the day and 44.2% at night.
Figure 1

Map showing the study area of Aligarh.

Figure 1

Map showing the study area of Aligarh.

Close modal

In recent decades, urbanization and industrialization have rapidly increased in this area, leading to a significant increase in water demand and consequently wastewater generation. This resulted in a major problem with the disposal of wastewater, as there is no proper natural drainage system. As a result, the city is often submerged, especially during the rainy season, and some parts of the city remain submerged throughout the year due to an ineffective drainage system (Rahman 2008). Aligarh is well known for its lock industry, with almost 5,506 industries including about 3,500 small industries, 2,000 medium industries, and 6 large-scale industries. To ensure sustainable development and promote a healthy living environment for its residents, effective management of the industrial activities resulting in pollution is indispensible for Aligarh (Rahman 2008; Mainier et al. 2015).

The studied region Aligarh is supported by the sediments from the Quaternary period, which were deposited by the Ganga and Yamuna rivers and their tributaries, as shown in Figure 2. These sediments are primarily composed of clay, sand, and calcite concretions, known as Kankar. The alluvium deposits, which are found in the area, are primarily made up of red shale from the Bhander group of Vindhyan rocks and can reach up to 380 meters in depth. The rivers Ganga and Yamuna, along with their tributaries, played a major role in shaping the geology of the region by carrying and depositing sediments over a large area.
Figure 2

Geological map and hydrological map of Aligarh, District, UP.

Figure 2

Geological map and hydrological map of Aligarh, District, UP.

Close modal

The aquifer system is comprised of three separate aquifers that have merged into one unified aquifer system. The first group of aquifers is composed of fine to medium-grade sand and is a source of fresh water for various sources of water supply such as handpumps, government tube wells, and shallow tube wells. The depth of this aquifer is located between 0 and 122 m below ground level. After the first group of aquifers, there is a thick layer of calcareous clay that separates it from the middle aquifer. The middle aquifer is located between 100 and 150 meters below ground level and due to the presence of calcareous clay, the water found in this aquifer is saline in nature. The third and final layer of the aquifer system is located between 130 and 300 meters below ground level. This layer is extensive in its geographical reach and is in a confined state, meaning that the water is isolated within the aquifer by surrounding layers of impermeable rocks. This layer of the aquifer has a medium sand size and the water found here is brackish to saline in nature (Khan & Khan 2019; Priyadarshi et al. 2020; Mohammad et al. 2022).

Studies on groundwater vulnerability in Aligarh were conducted to assess the presence of heavy metals in the area. All the samples were collected and analyzed as per standard methods to ensure the accuracy of the results. Briefly, the samples were collected in sterile 250-ml polyethylene bottles and treated with nitric acid (HNO3) to eliminate the possibility of precipitation of heavy metals (Rowe & Abdel-Magid 2020). The study area was chosen as it appears to host various industries or is an emerging region with a diverse industrial landscape. All the data sets are comprised of primary data collected by physically visiting all the specified locations. The water samples were gathered in two rounds. Initially, samples were taken from 20 locations within the industrial drains. In a subsequent round, 17 samples were taken from different groundwater sources, such as hand pumps and submersible pumps in close area to the industries. The analysis of heavy metals was performed in the environmental engineering laboratory using an Atomic Absorption Spectrometer (Perkin Elmer PinAAcle 900F). Before analysis, each sample was filtered using Whatman-1 filter paper.

Standards of heavy metals

Numerous organizations and regulatory bodies worldwide have established guidelines to ensure the safe levels of heavy metals in drinking water. These standards and standardization efforts form the foundation for technical regulations. Notably, the World Health Organization (WHO) Guideline Values (GV), the United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA), the Bureau of Indian Standards (BIS), and the European Union Maximum Acceptable Concentration (EU MAC) guidelines and standards for drinking water quality, widely recognized on a global scale. These benchmarks serve as essential references to guarantee the safety and quality of drinking water. By adhering to these established guidelines, we can have confidence that the drinking water we consume meets the necessary standards for heavy metal concentration, as set forth by these esteemed organizations.

Table 1 provides water quality standards prescribed by the different internationally responsible organizations.

Table 1

Heavy metal concentration guidelines established by international agencies, in mg/l

MetalsBIS limit (Bureau of Indian Standards 2021)WHO GV (WHO 2017b)USEPA MCL (Environmental Protection Agency & of Water 2018)EU MAC (UNICEF/WHO 2008)
Lead 0.01 0.01 0.015 0.01 
Chromium 0.05 0.05 0.1 0.05 
Iron 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.2 
Manganese 0.1 0.4 0.05 0.05 
Zinc – 
Copper 0.05 
Nickel 0.02 0.07 0.02 0.02 
MetalsBIS limit (Bureau of Indian Standards 2021)WHO GV (WHO 2017b)USEPA MCL (Environmental Protection Agency & of Water 2018)EU MAC (UNICEF/WHO 2008)
Lead 0.01 0.01 0.015 0.01 
Chromium 0.05 0.05 0.1 0.05 
Iron 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.2 
Manganese 0.1 0.4 0.05 0.05 
Zinc – 
Copper 0.05 
Nickel 0.02 0.07 0.02 0.02 

Contamination index

The contamination index (CDx) is a measure of the overall impact of various water quality factors that are harmful to drinking water (Mazhar & Ahmad 2020). To determine the level of contamination, the contamination factor of each component in a water sample that surpasses the acceptable limit is calculated and summed up. The highest value obtained is considered to be the maximum permissible level of contamination. This system categorizes the levels of contamination into six groups based on the CD values:

CD (0.3) represents an extremely pure level of contamination.

CD (0.3–1) also denotes an extremely pure level.

CD (1–2) indicates a slightly affected level of contamination.

CD (2–4) implies a moderately affected level.

CD (4–6) shows a severely affected level of contamination.

CD (>6) represents a severely contaminated area.

It is important to note that the CDx provides a standardized method of determining contamination levels and helps in the proper management of the areas. It can be calculated by the given formula:
where
  • Cfi is the contamination factor for ith parameter; CAi is the analytical value for the ith parameter; CNi is the upper permissible value of the ith parameter (N is the normative value).

The heavy metal pollution index

The heavy metal pollution index (HPI) is a method of determining the impact of heavy metals on the quality of water. It can be found by assigning a weight to each selected water quality factor, with the weight being proportional to the inverse of the recommended standard (Si) for that particular parameter. This index provides a clear representation of the combined effect of heavy metals on the overall water quality and helps to identify and address any potential health hazards.

The HPI is divided into two categories to determine the quality of the water:

If the HPI < 100, it indicates that the water is safe for drinking.

If the HPI > 100, it implies that the water is polluted with heavy metals and is not safe for drinking purposes.

This system provides a clear and concise way to evaluate the overall quality of the water supply, making it easier to identify any potential health hazards and take appropriate action (Horton 1965; Mohan et al. 1996).

It can be calculated by following the formula given below:
where Qi is the sub-index of the ith component; Wi is the unit weightage of the ith component; n is the number of parameters considered.

Interpretation from GIS Map

The latitude and longitude of sampled groundwater were recorded at the time of grabbing the sample by the GPS and the KML file of the study area is drawn using the Google Earth program. All the GIS-aided spatial maps were prepared by using ArcGIS software and the IDW approach was used for geoprocessing the data of heavy metals. In IDW, a weight is assigned to the measured point and this weight is the function of inverse distance. Depending on the distance from one point to another point, the amount of weight will vary (Watson & Philip 1985). The closer two sites are to one another, the more similar their attribute values are. Using a weighted combination of a set of known model points, IDW interpolation derives unknown values. As a result, neighboring points have the greatest impact on interpolation. The following formula is used to calculate the weight factor.
  • λ indicates the weight of the point, Di indicates the distance between point i and the unknown point, α indicates the power ten of weight.

This study analyzed the presence of heavy metals in both industrial effluent and groundwater samples collected from various locations in urban Aligarh. It is important to note that metallic water contamination may be a direct consequence of the existence of metalliferous deposits in the soil and rock (Ghasera et al. 2021). However, the primary sources of heavy metals in the studied area groundwater are industrial activities, including various operations, such as lock manufacturing and polishing. The potential adverse effects of higher heavy metal levels on human health have become a pivotal point of this research study. As increased concentrations of heavy metals can pose a severe risk to human as well as plants and animals (Islam et al. 2018; Nath et al. 2018; Ojaswini et al. 2022).

To determine the distribution pattern of the concentration of different elements and to demarcate higher concentration zones, contour maps for various elements were generated using the ArcGIS 9.3 software. The water quality assessment has brought to light a concerning issue prominently contamination, with emphasis on the presence of lead (Pb), chromium (Cr), iron (Fe), manganese (Mn), zinc (Zn), copper (Cu), and nickel (Ni). The heavy metals taken into consideration since, these are widely used in the industrial operations taking place in the surrounding area. It is apparent that these metals have made their way into the water, potentially stemming from their use in locks manufacturing. Table 2 presents statistical summaries of heavy metal concentrations in groundwater and industrial effluent, encompassing maximum, minimum, and average values. These statistics provide an overview of central tendency and variability in the data set.

Table 2

Statistical measures such as maximum, minimum, and average of groundwater and industrial effluent in urban Aligarh

ParametersGroundwater of urban Aligarh
Industry effluent in urban Aligarh
MaxMinAvg.MaxMinAvg.
Pb 0.002 0.000340 6.07 1.2 
Cr 0.009 0.001780 78.3 18.32 
Fe 0.36 0.09633 27.4 6.3 
Mn 0.161 0.000056 0.04746 8.1 1.165 
Zn 0.88 0.10607 1.63 0.51 
Cu 7.6 0.97636 8.7 1.998 
Ni 9.7 0.000334 1.8666 46.1 13.34 
ParametersGroundwater of urban Aligarh
Industry effluent in urban Aligarh
MaxMinAvg.MaxMinAvg.
Pb 0.002 0.000340 6.07 1.2 
Cr 0.009 0.001780 78.3 18.32 
Fe 0.36 0.09633 27.4 6.3 
Mn 0.161 0.000056 0.04746 8.1 1.165 
Zn 0.88 0.10607 1.63 0.51 
Cu 7.6 0.97636 8.7 1.998 
Ni 9.7 0.000334 1.8666 46.1 13.34 

Concentration of lead in industrial wastewater and groundwater

The present study reveals that the mean concentration of lead in industrial effluent is 1.14 mg/l, and minimal traces detected in groundwater as represented in Figure 3 (WHO 2017b; Meena et al. 2020). The highest lead concentration in industrial effluent was recorded in Makki Nagar at 6.07 mg/l, followed by Karbala at 4.23 mg/l, Sarai Rehman at 2.76 mg/l, Al-Iqra Lodge at 0.89 mg/l, Delhi Gate at 0.88 mg/l, Bhujpura at 0.65 mg/l, Kunjalpur at 0.44 mg/l, and Nandan Colony at 0.23 mg/l. However, it's important to note that the lead concentration in groundwater remains below the permissible limits set by both the WHO and USEPA (WHO 2017b). The contamination of groundwater with lead may be attributed to the discharge of industrial effluents, household sewage, and detergents (Zuo et al. 2023). High lead consumption can cause adverse effects on the liver, kidneys, cardiovascular system, hemopoietic system, and nervous system (Hsu & Guo 2002; Meena et al. 2020). Some of these diseases are also found in the nearby area as presented in the Table 3.
Figure 3

Pb concentration in industrial effluent and groundwater.

Figure 3

Pb concentration in industrial effluent and groundwater.

Close modal
Table 3

The data on different diseases collected from JN Medical College, Aligarh (Anjum et al. 2023)

YearKidney stoneGallbladder stoneG.I. diseasesOrthopaedic diseasesSkin diseases
2015 90 535 230 57 64,416 
2016 95 550 235 60 73,138 
2017 88 586 3,914 85,510 89,839 
2018 92 577 3,856 89,569 99,032 
2019 89 567 3,926 94,948 103,593 
2020 Nil Nil 1,131 20,128 21,841 
YearKidney stoneGallbladder stoneG.I. diseasesOrthopaedic diseasesSkin diseases
2015 90 535 230 57 64,416 
2016 95 550 235 60 73,138 
2017 88 586 3,914 85,510 89,839 
2018 92 577 3,856 89,569 99,032 
2019 89 567 3,926 94,948 103,593 
2020 Nil Nil 1,131 20,128 21,841 

Concentration of chromium in industrial wastewater and groundwater

Chromium (Cr) is a detrimental contaminant with adverse effects on both groundwater and soil. The US Environmental Protection Agency has classified it as a top-priority pollutant (Ceballos et al. 2021). The primary health concerns associated with chromium stem from its hexavalent state, which can lead to conditions such as hepatic necrosis, membrane ulcers, and skin inflammation when comes in contact with skin (Mathew & Beeregowda 2015; Sharma et al. 2021). In the context of our current study, the analysis revealed chromium levels ranging from 0.009 to 0 mg/l in groundwater samples, with an average value of 0.00168 mg/l. These findings indicated that the concentration of chromium in different locations of urban Aligarh remains in permissible limits in groundwater, with values for Govind Nagar at 0.009 mg/l, Kalandi Puram at 0.005 mg/l, Mamoon Nagar at 0.004 mg/l, Prem Nagar at 0.003 mg/l, and Eidgah Road at 0.002 mg/l. Furthermore, the effluents from various industrial sources in urban Aligarh showed substantial higher concentrations of Cr, with Sarai Rehman at 78.30 mg/l, Mamoon Nagar at 72.00 mg/l, Mamoon Nagar-B at 67 mg/l., Kunjalpur at 12.01 mg/l, Nandan colony at 11.01 mg/l, Bhujpura at 5.02 mg/l, Bihari Puram at 4.64 mg/l, and ADA colony at 3.4 mg/l, respectively, with the concentration level is represented in Figure 4.
Figure 4

Cr concentration in industrial effluent and groundwater.

Figure 4

Cr concentration in industrial effluent and groundwater.

Close modal

These increased chromium levels observed in industrial wastewater may be attributed to the utilization of chromium in different lock manufacturing processes, such as polishing to give lustrous finish and provide protection against corrosion. During these manufacturing stages, residual chromium may find its way into drainage systems, leading to the high concentrations detected in industrial effluents.

The current presence of trace amounts of chromium in groundwater signifies the probable for infiltration. If this infiltration continues at the current rate, it has the potential to induce significant alterations in the quality of drinking water, potentially leading to a harmful situation.

Concentration of Iron in industrial wastewater and groundwater

Iron, a biologically vital element found in the Earth's crust, can impact water's flavor and color. It is essential for all organisms and is an important component of the hemoglobin system (Ajmal & Jamal 2023). In water sources, elevated iron concentrations can create an environment conducive to the growth of both pathogenic and non-pathogenic microorganisms, resulting in the formation of a slimy film within containers, reservoirs, irrigation ducts, and pipes (Chowdhury et al. 2022). This study has revealed iron concentrations, shown in Figure 5, in groundwater ranges from 0 to 0.36 mg/l, with an average of 0.0973 mg/l. These levels in locations such as Govind Nagar (0.36 mg/l), Rorawar Road (0.061 mg/l), Nivar Road (0.056 mg/l), Nivri Mod (0.058 mg/l) and Aashiq Nagar (0.044 mg/l), fall within the acceptable limits for drinking water according to WHO and BIS standards. Conversely, industrial effluent shows a broader range of iron concentrations, from 0 to 27.40 mg/l, with an average of 6.30 mg/l. The notably higher iron levels in areas such as Karbala (27.40 mg/l), Makki Nagar (27.20 mg/l), Rorawar (8.71 mg/l), and Sarai Rehman (14.90 mg/l) raise concerns about potential impacts on groundwater quality in urban Aligarh in the near future.
Figure 5

Fe concentration in industrial effluent and groundwater.

Figure 5

Fe concentration in industrial effluent and groundwater.

Close modal

Concentration of Nickel in industrial wastewater and groundwater

There are certain toxicants classified as ‘light metals’ that pose a significant risk to the environment and ecosystems when present in high concentrations, and Ni is one such example (Ghasera et al. 2021). Nickel is found to be a probable carcinogenic substance that can have adverse effects on the lungs. Additionally, exposure to nickel is linked with a risk of skin allergies, fibrosis of the lungs, and respiratory cancer for the population (EPA 2002).

Within the study area shown in Figure 6, the nickel concentration exhibits a wide spectrum in groundwater, ranging from 9.7 to 0.000334 mg/l, with an average of 1.866 mg/l. The highest recorded concentration is found in Govind Nagar at 9.7 mg/l, followed by Mamoon Nagar at 4.2 mg/l, Nivar Road at 2.7 mg/l, Mamoon Nagar at 0.2 mg/l, and Eidgah Road at 0.201 mg/l. The presence of nickel is very high from permissible limit stated by WHO and India's standard sand the area is more vulnerable in future since industrial waste have very high concentration.
Figure 6

Ni concentration in industrial effluent and groundwater.

Figure 6

Ni concentration in industrial effluent and groundwater.

Close modal

Additionally, conspicuous high-level nickel contamination is evident in the effluent from industries in various locality such as Rorawar, which records a concentration of 46.10 mg/l, Saifi Colony with 43.40 mg/l, and Karbala at 38 Makki Nagar, indicating a concentration of 6.7 mg/l. Interestingly, despite the notable concentration in industrial waste, groundwater levels remain comparatively low. This phenomenon could be attributed to the limited number of industries or recent industrial developments in area, or may be the industrial wastewater does not infiltrate the groundwater.

Concentration of Manganese in industrial wastewater and groundwater

The presence of elevated manganese levels in water can give rise to toxicity and pose health risks to individuals (WHO 2017a). Manganese is naturally occurring in various sources, including surface water, groundwater, and food (Oeppen 1998; Chowdhury et al. 2022; Rushdi et al. 2023). While manganese is an essential mineral for both humans and animals, research conducted on neonates receiving parenteral nutrition has indicated that excessive levels can lead to neurotoxicity (Gomes-Silva et al. 2023). Our findings, in Figure 7, reveal that the manganese concentration in all water samples falls below the permissible limits established by the WHO. In groundwater, manganese levels ranged from 0.161 to 0.000056 mg/l, with an average of 0.044 mg/l. Furthermore, industrial effluents in areas such as Makki Nagar recorded manganese levels of 8.1 mg/l, Karbala at 2 mg/l, Kunjalpur at 0.9 mg/l, and Delhi Gate at 0.89 mg/l. These high manganese levels in industrial effluents have the potential to impact groundwater quality in the urban Aligarh region.
Figure 7

Mn concentration in industrial effluent and groundwater.

Figure 7

Mn concentration in industrial effluent and groundwater.

Close modal

Concentration of Copper in industrial wastewater and groundwater

Copper (Cu) is commonly found in Earth's soil due to sources like copper mining, factories, and fossil fuel combustion (Ismanto et al. 2023). Additionally, it is used in lock manufacturing, primarily in components like lock cylinders and keys. Brass, a copper–zinc alloy, is chosen for its durability and corrosion resistance. Copper toxicity can cause health issues including gastrointestinal manifestations, delayed birth formation, reduced body weight, and liver and kidney damage (Oladoye et al. 2022). In this study, as displayed in Figure 8, copper levels range from 0 to 8.7 mg/l, with an average of 0.898 mg/l. Particularly, two locations, Govind Nagar (7.6 mg/l) and Nivar Road (1.99 mg/l), surpass permissible limits. However, Industrial effluents show the higher copper concentrations in Sarai Rehman at 8.7 mg/l, Karbala (1) at 8.5 mg/l, Karbala (2) at 6.5 mg/l, Mamoon Nagar at 1.05 mg/l, and Turkman at 1.04 mg/l, likely contributing to groundwater contamination.
Figure 8

Cu concentration in industrial effluent and groundwater.

Figure 8

Cu concentration in industrial effluent and groundwater.

Close modal

Concentration of zinc in industrial wastewater and groundwater

According to various researches, zinc is considered an essential element, has been linked to detrimental effects, including stomach lining damage, weakened immune responses, and reduced HDL cholesterol levels in the blood when its concentration exceeds 50 ppm (Marion 1998). There is a significant increase in the amount of zinc (Zn) in the effluents of several sectors, such as woollen mill, marble, paper mill, and glass industries have been identified as contributors to increased zinc in their effluents, surpassing the limits established by the National Environmental Quality Standards (NEQS). The zinc concentration decreased below the established limit, making it suitable for human consumption (Gyamfi et al. 2012).

The increased concentration of metals directly affects the groundwater quality, raising substantial concerns for the local environment. Although the results, as presented in Figure 9, suggest that the heavy metal concentrations in these groundwater sources are currently within the permissible limits set by regulatory bodies such as WHO and USEPA, it's noteworthy that copper and nickel levels are significantly impacted by industrial effluent. This direct influence on groundwater contamination poses challenges for residents in the area, hindering their access to safe drinking water. A set of data, which were collected by some researchers on waterborne diseases in the study area, is presented in Table 3 (Anjum et al. 2023).
Figure 9

Zn concentration in industrial effluent and groundwater.

Figure 9

Zn concentration in industrial effluent and groundwater.

Close modal

Heavy metal indices

The study reveals that zinc levels in groundwater range from 1.029 to 0.152 mg/l, with an average value of 0.154 mg/l. In contrast, in the industry effluent, these levels vary from 1.63 to 0.00 mg/l, with an average value of 0.051 mg/l. Importantly, all these measurements in both groundwater and industrial effluents are found to be below the established permissible limits set by the WHO and the BIS, indicating a positive trend in the urban area's zinc contamination scenario (Marion 1998).

The results obtained through two distinct analytical methods offer a well-defined assessment and categorization of various regions in terms of groundwater suitability for human consumption. The statistical calculations for both the HPI and CDx are presented in Table 4. Analyzing the HPI values for 17 locations revealed that 11 of them fall within the group with values below 100, indicating a lower level of contamination and suggesting that the groundwater is potentially safe for drinking purposes. These locations represent a substantial proportion, accounting for 64.7% of the total surveyed area. In contrast, the remaining six locations (Govind Nagar, Nivar Road, Rorawar Road, Mamoon Nagar (1), ADA colony, and Mamoon Nagar (2)), accounting for 35.3%, were identified as having HPI values exceeding 100. These elevated values are mostly attributed to higher concentrations of Nickel and Copper in groundwater, making it unfit for consumption.

Table 4

Values of heavy metal indices

S. no.Sample locationHPIxCDx
Govind Nagar 1,874.40 145.408 
Nivar road 534.53 41.104 
Nivri Mod 66.28 5.515 
Aashiq Nagar 50.25 3.982 
Rorawar Road 440.17 33.256 
Labbaik Mosque 24.54 2.773 
Mamoon Nagar (1) 836.64 63.284 
ADA Colony 575.66 43.115 
Eidgah (1) 4.90 0.514 
10 ADA colony 4.64 0.558 
11 Eidgah (2) 11.16 1.270 
12 Eidgah Road 51.79 5.034 
13 Mamoon Nagar B (2) 148.34 11.289 
14 Mamoon Nagar B (3) 5.86 0.873 
15 Sarai Rehman 60.52 0.006 
16 Prem Nagar 27.20 1.736 
17 Kalandi Puram 6.88 1.002 
S. no.Sample locationHPIxCDx
Govind Nagar 1,874.40 145.408 
Nivar road 534.53 41.104 
Nivri Mod 66.28 5.515 
Aashiq Nagar 50.25 3.982 
Rorawar Road 440.17 33.256 
Labbaik Mosque 24.54 2.773 
Mamoon Nagar (1) 836.64 63.284 
ADA Colony 575.66 43.115 
Eidgah (1) 4.90 0.514 
10 ADA colony 4.64 0.558 
11 Eidgah (2) 11.16 1.270 
12 Eidgah Road 51.79 5.034 
13 Mamoon Nagar B (2) 148.34 11.289 
14 Mamoon Nagar B (3) 5.86 0.873 
15 Sarai Rehman 60.52 0.006 
16 Prem Nagar 27.20 1.736 
17 Kalandi Puram 6.88 1.002 

The second method, the CDx, serves as an alternative method for analyzing water quality by quantifying traces of heavy metals. It plays a crucial role in categorizing groundwater quality. Based on the resulting values, it becomes evident that within the urban area of Aligarh, four locations (Eidgah (1), ADA colony, Mamoon Nagar B (2), and Sarai Rehman) fall into the category of high purity, accounting for 23.53% of the total locations. These areas exhibit negligible amounts of metals. Additionally, three locations (Eidgah (2), Prem Nagar, and Kalandi Puram) are deemed slightly affected, representing 17.6% of the total. The elevated values of copper along with iron and manganese contribute to the contamination. Furthermore, two locations (Aashiq Nagar and Labbaik Mosque) exhibit a moderate level of contamination due to the presence of nickel, constituting 11.7% of the total visited locations. Similarly, Nivri Mod and Eidgah Road were identified as being affected by a higher pollution level, also accounting for 11.7% of the total. In the Nivri Mod, nickel, iron, and manganese contributed, while on Eidgah Road, traces of zinc along with Iron, Manganese, and Nickel are responsible. Lastly, five locations were found to be severely contaminated, representing 29.4% of the total observed locations. In Govind Nagar, Nivar Road, Mamoon Nagar, and ADA colony, almost all seven metals were found in low to higher concentrations. Additionally, on Rorawar Road, nickel, iron, and manganese contributed, and in Mamoon Nagar B (1), nickel and copper raised the CDx values. A significant portion of the groundwater in the region is affected by industrial wastewater. Therefore, it is imperative to implement conservation measures to preserve groundwater for sustainable use in the future.

The primary objective of this study was to assess the impact of industrial effluent on the contamination of groundwater of urban Aligarh pertaining to heavy metals. Through comprehensive analysis and examination, this research aimed to shed light on the intricate relationship between industrial activities and the quality of groundwater, contributing valuable insights to the ongoing discourse on environmental sustainability. The highest contamination was observed for nickel and copper along with few traces of other metals in the groundwater. Conversely, in industrial wastewater, metals were present in the order of Ni > Cu > Mn > Cr > Fe > Pb > Zn, all exceeding the permissible limits. Both the HPI and CDx were successfully utilized for determining the overall degree of groundwater contamination. The analyzed water samples of various locations in urban Aligarh revealed that 64.7% of sites have groundwater safe for human consumption, while remaining 35.3%, was found affected by heavy metal traces beyond permissible limits. Moreover, the CDx values provided closer insights into the area, indicating that 23.53% of locations have pure water, 17.6% have slight contamination, 11.7% have a moderate level of contamination, 11.7% are severely affected, with an overall 29.4% of sites being extensively polluted. Furthermore, groundwater and industrial effluent monitoring results were utilized to create a map using interpolation techniques with ArcGIS software. The maps display the spatial distribution of heavy metal concentrations in urban Aligarh regions. The findings of this study suggest that the government should consider implementing specific treatment technologies or regulations, such as the centralized Effluent Treatment Plant, along with some tertiary treatment measures to effectively reduce the presence of heavy metals below the drinking water specifications.

This work is not supported by any funding or grant.

Each author made a significant contribution to the planning, collection, and analysis of the study's data. All authors participated in the development of the initial and final versions of the manuscript.

All relevant data are included in the paper or its Supplementary Information.

The authors declare there is no conflict.

AInyinbor Adejumoke
D. A.
&
Toyin
A. O.
2018
Water pollution: Effects, prevention, and climatic impact
. In:
Water Challenges of an Urbanizing World
.
https://doi.org/10.5772/INTECHOPEN.72018.
Ajmal
U.
&
Jamal
S.
2023
A Remote Sensing and GIS-Based Approach for Assessment of Drinking Water Quality and Its Association with Land-Use Land-Cover in Azamgarh City, India. 431–444. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-21587-2_25.
Anjum
R.
,
Ali
S. A.
,
Siddiqui
M. A.
,
Parvin
F.
,
Khan
Z.
,
Khan
N.
,
Khanam
Z.
&
Nafees
M.
2023
Hydro-geochemical assessment of ground water for drinking and agricultural purposes and potential human health risk in Aligarh city, India
.
Chemical Engineering Journal Advances
16
,
100547
.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceja.2023.100547
.
Bazrafshan
E.
,
Mohammadi
L.
,
Ansari-Moghaddam
A.
&
Mahvi
A. H.
2015
Heavy metals removal from aqueous environments by electrocoagulation process – A systematic review
.
Journal of Environmental Health Science and Engineering
13
(
1
),
1
16
.
https://doi.org/10.1186/S40201-015-0233-8/TABLES/6
.
Bureau of Indian Standards
2021
Indian Standard DRINKING WATER – SPECIFICATION
.
Ceballos
E.
,
Dubny
S.
,
Othax
N.
,
Zabala
M. E.
&
Peluso
F.
2021
Assessment of human health risk of chromium and nitrate pollution in groundwater and soil of the Matanza-Riachuelo River Basin, Argentina
.
Exposure and Health
13
(
3
),
323
336
.
https://doi.org/10.1007/S12403-021-00386-9
.
Chowdhury
I. R.
,
Chowdhury
S.
,
Mazumder
M. A. J.
&
Al-Ahmed
A.
2022
Removal of lead ions (Pb2+) from water and wastewater: A review on the low-cost adsorbents
.
Applied Water Science
12
(
8
),
1
33
.
https://doi.org/10.1007/S13201-022-01703-6
.
Environmental Protection Agency, U., & of Water, O.
2018
2018 Edition of the Drinking Water Standards and Health Advisories Tables (EPA 822-F-18-001)
.
EPA
2002
European Union Environmental Risk Assessment of Nickel REGIONAL/CONTINENTAL POINT AND DIFFUSE EMISSIONS
.
Gomes-Silva
A. P.
,
de Medeiros
C.
,
da
P.
,
Silva
L. N.
,
Da Silva Araújo Santiago
M.
&
& Perobelli
J. E.
2023
Exposure to manganese during sertoli cell formation and proliferation disturbs early testicular development in rats
.
Reproductive Toxicology
120
,
108447
.
https://doi.org/10.1016/J.REPROTOX.2023.108447
.
Gyamfi, E., Ackah, M., Anim, A. K., Hanson, J. K., Kpattah, L., Enti-Brown, S., Adjei-Kyereme, Y. & Nyarko, E. S. 2012, undefined (2012) Chemical analysis of potable water samples from selected suburbs of Accra, Ghana. Academia.Edu E.T. Gyamfi, M. Ackah, A. K. Anim, J. K. Hanson, L. Kpattah, S. Enti-Brown, Y. Adjei-Kyereme, and E. S. Nyarko Proceedings of the International Academy of Ecology and Environmental …, 2012•academia.Edu. Available from: https://www.academia.edu/download/83840209/Chemical_analysis_of_potable_water_sampl20220411-6774-9xpz2y.pdf.
Horton
R. E.
1965
The hydrologic cycle
.
JAWRA Journal of the American Water Resources Association
1
(
4
),
32
32
.
https://doi.org/10.1111/jawr.1965.1.4.32
.
Hsu
P. C.
&
Guo
Y. L.
2002
Antioxidant nutrients and lead toxicity
.
Toxicology
180
(
1
),
33
44
.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0300-483X(02)00380-3
.
Hunsom
M.
,
Pruksathorn
K.
,
Damronglerd
S.
,
Vergnes
H.
&
Duverneuil
P.
2005
Electrochemical treatment of heavy metals (Cu2+, Cr6+, Ni2+) from industrial effluent and modeling of copper reduction
.
Water Research
39
(
4
),
610
616
.
https://doi.org/10.1016/J.WATRES.2004.10.011
.
Islam
A. R. M. T.
,
Shen
S.
,
Haque
M. A.
,
Bodrud-Doza
M.
,
Maw
K. W.
&
Habib
M. A.
2018
Assessing groundwater quality and its sustainability in Joypurhat district of Bangladesh using GIS and multivariate statistical approaches
.
Environment, Development and Sustainability
20
(
5
),
1935
1959
.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-017-9971-3
.
Ismanto
A.
,
Hadibarata
T.
,
Widada
S.
,
Indrayanti
E.
,
Ismunarti
D. H.
,
Safinatunnajah
N.
,
Kusumastuti
W.
,
Dwiningsih
Y.
&
Alkahtani
J.
2023
Groundwater contamination status in Malaysia: Level of heavy metal, source, health impact, and remediation technologies
.
Bioprocess and Biosystems Engineering
46
(
3
),
467
482
.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00449-022-02826-5
.
Khan
H. H.
&
Khan
A.
2019
Groundwater-surface water interaction along river Kali, near Aligarh, India
.
HydroResearch
2
,
119
128
.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hydres.2019.12.001
.
Mainier
F. B.
,
Pontual
L.
,
Oliveira
R. T. Q. d.
,
Santos
I. d. O.
,
Mainier
F. B.
,
Pontual
L.
,
Oliveira
R. T. Q. d.
&
Santos
I. d. O.
2015
Contamination precautions for chemicals which may be used in drinking water treatment
.
Journal of Materials Science and Chemical Engineering
3
(
11
),
63
71
.
https://doi.org/10.4236/MSCE.2015.311008
.
Marion
G. M.
1998
The geochemistry of natural waters: Surface and groundwater environments, third edition
.
Journal of Environmental Quality
27
(
1
),
245
246
.
https://doi.org/10.2134/JEQ1998.00472425002700010037X
.
Mathew
B. B.
&
Beeregowda
K. N.
2015
Health effects caused by metal contaminated ground water
.
International Journal of Advances in Scientific Research
1
(
2
),
60
.
https://doi.org/10.7439/ijasr.v1i2.1798
.
Mazhar
S. N.
&
Ahmad
S.
2020
Assessment of water quality pollution indices and distribution of heavy metals in drinking water in Ramganga aquifer, Bareilly District Uttar Pradesh, India
.
Groundwater for Sustainable Development
10
,
100304
.
https://doi.org/10.1016/J.GSD.2019.100304
.
Meena
V.
,
Dotaniya
M. L.
,
Saha
J. K.
,
Das
H.
&
Patra
A. K.
2020
Impact of Lead Contamination on Agroecosystem and Human Health
, pp.
67
82
.
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-21638-2_4
.
Mohammad
N.
,
Alam
M.
&
Beg
M.
2022
Technical Aspect of Water Resource Management of Aligarh District
, pp.
569
580
.
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-4364-5_41
.
Mohan
S. V.
,
Nithila
P.
&
Reddy
S. J.
1996
Estimation of heavy metals in drinking water and development of heavy metal pollution index
.
Journal of Environmental Science and Health. Part A: Environmental Science and Engineering and Toxicology
31
(
2
),
283
289
.
https://doi.org/10.1080/10934529609376357
.
Nath
B. K.
,
Chaliha
C.
,
Bhuyan
B.
,
Kalita
E.
,
Baruah
D. C.
&
Bhagabati
A. K.
2018
GIS mapping-based impact assessment of groundwater contamination by arsenic and other heavy metal contaminants in the Brahmaputra River valley: A water quality assessment study
.
Journal of Cleaner Production
201
,
1001
1011
.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.08.084
.
Niu
L.
,
Tang
Y.
,
Zhu
B.
,
Huang
Z.
,
Wang
D.
,
Chen
Q.
&
Yu
J.
2023
Nitric oxide promotes adventitious root formation in cucumber under cadmium stress through improving antioxidant system, regulating glycolysis pathway and polyamine homeostasis
.
Frontiers in Plant Science
14
.
https://doi.org/10.3389/FPLS.2023.1126606
.
Oeppen
B.
1998
MERRITTS, D., DE WET, A. & MENKING, K. 1998. Environmental Geology. An Earth System Science Approach. xxvii +452 pp. New York, Basingstoke: W. H. Freeman &amp; Co. Price £24.95 (paperback). ISBN 0 7167 2834 6. Geological Magazine, 135(6), 819–842. https://doi.org/DOI: 10.1017/S0016756898621506
Ojaswini
C.
,
Sathe
S. S.
,
Mahanta
C.
&
Kushwaha
A.
2022
Evaluation of iron coated natural sand for removal of dissolved arsenic from groundwater and develop sustainable filter media
.
Environmental Nanotechnology, Monitoring & Management
18
,
100682
.
https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ENMM.2022.100682
.
Oladoye
P. O.
,
Olowe
O. M.
&
Asemoloye
M. D.
2022
Phytoremediation technology and food security impacts of heavy metal contaminated soils: A review of literature
.
Chemosphere
288
,
132555
.
https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CHEMOSPHERE.2021.132555
.
Pain
D. J.
,
Sánchez
A.
&
Meharg
A. A.
1998
The Doñana ecological disaster: Contamination of a world heritage estuarine marsh ecosystem with acidified pyrite mine waste
.
The Science of the Total Environment
222
(
1–2
),
45
54
.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-9697(98)00290-3
.
Priyadarshi
H.
,
Priya
S.
,
Alvi
S. H.
,
Jain
A.
,
Rao
S.
&
Singh
R.
2020
Physico-Chemical Analysis of Groundwater in Iglas and Beswan, Aligarh District, Uttar Pradesh, India
, pp.
103
117
.
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-34178-7_9
.
Rahman
A.
2008
A GIS based DRASTIC model for assessing groundwater vulnerability in shallow aquifer in Aligarh, India
.
Applied Geography
28
(
1
),
32
53
.
https://doi.org/10.1016/J.APGEOG.2007.07.008
.
Rowe
D. R.
&
Abdel-Magid
I. M.
2020
Handbook of Wastewater Reclamation and Reuse
.
https://doi.org/10.1201/9780138752514
.
Rushdi
M. I.
,
Basak
R.
,
Das
P.
,
Ahamed
T.
&
Bhattacharjee
S.
2023
Assessing the health risks associated with elevated manganese and iron in groundwater in Sreemangal and Moulvibazar Sadar, Bangladesh
.
Journal of Hazardous Materials Advances
10
,
100287
.
https://doi.org/10.1016/J.HAZADV.2023.100287
.
Sharma
N.
,
Sodhi
K. K.
,
Kumar
M.
&
Singh
D. K.
2021
Heavy metal pollution: insights into chromium eco-toxicity and recent advancement in its remediation
.
Environmental Nanotechnology, Monitoring & Management
15
,
100388
.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enmm.2020.100388
.
UNICEF/WHO
2008
UNICEF handbook on water quality
. In:
UNICEF
, Vol.
13
, Issue
2
.
https://doi.org/10.3362/0262-8104.1994.037
.
Watson
D. F.
&
Philip
G. M.
1985
A refinement of inverse distance weighted interpolation
.
Geoprocessing
2
,
315
327
.
WHO
2017a
Guidelines for Drinking-Water Quality, 4th edn, Incorporating the 1st Addendum
.
WHO
2017b
Guidelines for Drinking-water Quality FOURTH EDITION INCORPORATING THE FIRST ADDENDUM. WHO Guidelines
.
Zuo
T. T.
,
Zhu
J.
,
Gao
F.
,
Wang
J. S.
,
Song
Q. H.
,
Wang
H. Y.
,
Sun
L.
,
Zhang
W. Q.
,
Kong
D. J.
,
Guo
Y. S.
,
Yang
J. B.
,
Wei
F.
,
Wang
Q.
,
Jin
H. y.
&
Ma
S. C.
2023
Innovative accumulative risk assessment strategy of co-exposure of As and Pb in medical earthworms based on in vivo-in vitro correlation
.
Environment International
175
,
107933
.
https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ENVINT.2023.107933
.
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Licence (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), which permits copying and redistribution for non-commercial purposes with no derivatives, provided the original work is properly cited (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).