Present study was conducted on Basuhi River to evaluate the suitability of water for domestic and irrigational use by calculating water quality index (WQI), nutrient pollution index, permeability index, Kelly ratio, soluble sodium percentage, sodium absorption ratio, chloro-alkaline indices, and magnesium adsorption ratio. Major cations; Na+, K+, Ca2+, Mg2+ were found between 4.1 to 23, 0.85 to 7.5, 12.26 to 112.26, 13.7 to 87.5 and 6.3 to 28.1, 0.7 to 7.8, 46.2 to 168, 8.8 to 82.56 mg/L, while major anions SO42−, HCO3, Cl, PO43−, F, and NO3 were found to be 23.5 to114.5, 1 to 51.98, 11.60 to 169.15, 0.198 to 1.598, 0.19 to 0.71, and 0.35 to 8.76 and 47.0 to 147.0, 4.0 to 24.02, 19.30 to 178.82, 0.012 to 3.61, 0.32 to 0.95, and 0.048 to 3.80 mg/L during pre and post monsoon season, respectively. Electrical conductivity, total hardness, Ca2+, and Mg2+ have exceeded the maximum desirable limit recommended by BIS (2012) and WHO (2017). WQI revealed that the water belongs to ‘moderate’ to ‘very poor’ category for drinking, however, majority of water samples were found fit for irrigational usage. Findings shall be helpful in determining the future environmental cost of development along the riverine ecosystem.

  • Health of the Basuhi River is evaluated for the first time with reference to ion chemistry.

  • The water quality of Basuhi River belongs to the ‘moderate’ to ‘very poor’ category.

  • Multivariate statistical analysis revealed the impact of anthropogenic activities on river water quality.

  • The concentration of Ca2+, Mg2+, Na+, and HCO3 was exceeded the maximum desirable limits recommended by the BIS (2012) and WHO (2017).

Water is a crucial natural resource for the survival of all organisms on earth (Shammi et al. 2023; Singh et al. 2024). More than a billion people around the world do not have access to safe water for their daily needs. Every year 6–8 million people die due to water related disease (diarrhea, typhoid, cholera, skin disease, kidney and gastrointestinal disorders) and disasters (Ashrafuzzaman et al. 2023; Guenouche et al. 2024). Surface water is a prime resource required in domestic, recreational, irrigation, fishery and industrial activities (Ravi et al. 2023; Shahmirnoori et al. 2023; Bisht et al. 2024). Fresh water demand is exponentially increasing due to industrialization, intense urbanization, population growth, and agricultural activities (Anwar & Mazhar 2024; Williams 2024). Human actions and natural processes have led to the excessive exploitation of these resources. Water quality easily deteriorates as it acts as a universal solvent. Water can dissolve significant contaminants from agricultural, industrial, and domestic sources (Lata 2021; Yadav et al. 2024a, 2024b). The deterioration of river water quality has become a serious global issue because of anthropogenic (agricultural runoff, municipal waste water, and industrial sewage discharge) and natural activities (flood, weathering of rocks, dust deposition, geochemical variations, lithological interaction) (Akhtar et al. 2021; Wu et al. 2021; Kumar et al. 2024). Water contamination not only affects the quality but also poses a threat to aquatic ecology, human health, and social prosperity economic developments (Dean & Mitchell 2022; Sahoo & Goswami 2024). Thus, continuous spatio-temporal monitoring of water quality can play a crucial role in water resource management and long-term protection of river health. Globally, approximately 70% of surface water resources are used for agricultural purposes, while 10% is used for domestic uses (Amiri et al. 2021). The of Food and Agricultural Organization (FAO 1994) reported that 20% of cultivated land produces 40% of food supply. Therefore, the suitability of river water for domestic and irrigation purposes is essential.

To ensure effective water resource management, it is vital to collect reliable data on river water quality, track spatio-temporal variation, identify contamination sources, assess the state of water quality, and regularly monitor pollution levels (Ustaoglu et al. 2021). Physicochemical indices serve as a supplementary approach to evaluate the water suitability. Various concepts and approaches such as multivariate statistical analysis, principal component analysis (PCA), Pearson correlation coefficient (PCC), WQI, permeability index (PI), Kelly ratio (KR), sodium absorption ratio (SAR), chloro-alkaline indices (CAI), soluble sodium percentage (SSP), and magnesium adsorption ratio (MAR) are broadly used to assess the drinking/irrigational water suitability. The WQI is broadly used for developing plans to manage both groundwater and surface water, particularly rivers (Uddin et al. 2021; Fentahun et al. 2023; Syeed et al. 2023). The computation of WQI considers various physicochemical parameters to effectively convert it into one numeric value to understand the usability for various purposes. Several WQI calculation models have been developed by researchers, however, no method is universally accepted worldwide (Abba et al. 2020; Masoud et al. 2022). The quality of irrigation water has a significant impact on crop growth and yield (Mupaso et al. 2024). As a result, there is an urgent need to increase our understanding about irrigation water quality. The water quality evaluation for irrigation is closely linked to the minerals found in soil, water, and plants (Kareem & Leventeli 2024). These minerals affect the nutrients availability for plants, structure and fertility of the soil, as well as overall health of the agricultural ecosystem (Kome et al. 2019). The minerals such as calcium, magnesium, and sodium also influence soil salinity and the absorption of nutrients by plants. Therefore, it is important to evaluate the mineral content for sustainable irrigation management.

In addition to water quality assessment, many studies focused on the health risks caused river contaminants. Study of river quality with reference to domestic and agricultural use was carried out in distinct regions of the world by researchers (Aminiyan et al. 2018; Uddin et al. 2024). Researchers also evaluated heavy metal pollution indices. Yadav et al. (2024a, 2024b) conducted a study on groundwater in the Basuhi River basin in Jaunpur, India. Abdullah (2013) focused on the Diyala River in Iraq, while Poshtegal & Mirbagheri (2019) examined the Zarrineh River in Iran. Additionally, Mokarram et al. (2020) studied the Kor River in Iran for the health assessment of rivers. Polluted water impacts on human health and aquatic life were also assessed by Okereafor et al. (2020) in mining tailing and Singh et al. (2022) in Kabul River Basin, Afghanistan. However, Basuhi River water suitability for domestic and irrigation needs is necessary considering hydro-chemicals facies.

The present work was conducted for the detailed study of water quality for drinking and irrigational purposes. The research was conducted with the following aims: (1) to evaluate the spatiotemporal variation in physicochemical parameters in the water of Basuhi River using statistical methods; (2) to evaluate the water quality index for water suitability for drinking uses; and (3) to evaluate the agricultural suitability of water by using PI, CAI, SAR, SSP, MAR, and KR. Research findings will provide important information for policymakers working towards the UN Agenda 2030 for restoring the riverine ecosystem.

Study area

Five rivers flow through the Jaunpur district of Uttar Pradesh, India: the Varuna, Basuhi, Pili, Gomti, and Sai. The Basuhi River is a significant waterway that traverses the eastern region of Uttar Pradesh, spanning roughly 90 km, before joining the Varuna River. The Basuhi River arises from Karnauli Tal near Mungra Badshahpur and joins the Varuna River at Jadupur. The entire river flows within the Jaunpur district. The maps of sampling sites are plotted in Figure 1. The district of Jaunpur is located at latitude 25.74° N and longitude 82.69° E, encompassing a land area of 4,038 km2 and a mean elevation of 290 meters above sea level. The average temperature of the Jaunpur district ranges between 5 and 47 °C. The district receives major rainfall during monsoon season with an average of 987 mm. The district's terrain is primarily made up of shallow river basins and plains and the majority of the soil is sandy and loamy.
Figure 1

Map presenting the Basuhi river sampling sites along with latitude and longitude in Jaunpur district.

Figure 1

Map presenting the Basuhi river sampling sites along with latitude and longitude in Jaunpur district.

Close modal

Sampling and methods

The water samples were collected from 17 identified locations of Basuhi River pre- and post-monsoon. Sampling sites map along with coordinates is presented in Figure 1. Applying standard sampling procedures, water samples were collected in previously washed 1 L high density polyethylene plastic bottle. Analysis of pH, EC, and DO was carried out instantly at the sampling points using a portable ion meter (Thermo Scientific Orion Versa Star Pro Advance electrochemistry). Subsequently, samples were labeled and kept at 4 °C for laboratory analysis of TH, Na+, K+, Ca2+, Mg2+, , , Cl, , F, and . The analysis of all parameters was done in triplicate and results expressed as average ± SD. Electrical conductivity is the measure of a minerals ability to conduct an electric current, typically influenced by the presence of ions. The electrical conductivity values in water, <250, 250–750, 750–2250, >2250, are considered as excellent, good, permissible, and doubtful, respectively. Dissolved oxygen in surface water is a critical indicator of water quality, reflecting the water's ability to support aquatic life and overall ecosystem health. The dissolved oxygen in river water can be classified as healthy (>8–15 mg/L), contaminated (5–8 mg/L) and highly contaminated (<5). Total hardness is an important parameter for domestic, industrial and agricultural uses. Total hardness is a measure of the concentration of calcium and magnesium ions in water. Total hardness can be classified into four categories: soft (75 mg/L), moderately soft (75–150 mg/L), hard (150–300 mg/L), and very hard (>300 mg/L).

All experiments were conducted using analytical-grade reagents. Physico-chemical characteristics were analyzed by standard methods followed by American Public Health Association (APHA 2017).

Water quality index (WQI)

The WQI is a convenient and reliable approach to evaluating the overall water quality fitness for domestic needs. In the last few decades, WQI has broadly been used for the assessment of overall quality of water (Dutta et al. 2018; Fentahun et al. 2023). WQI was calculated using the following formula suggested by Ustaoglu et al. (2021):
(1)
(2)
where Wi is the relative weight assigned from 1 (minimum) to 5 (maximum) regarding the significant effect of the parameters on human health and its importance. Ci and Si reflect the analyzed value of physico-chemical parameters and the standard values, respectively, as prescribed by WHO (2011) in water. The present study analyzed 14 physicochemical parameters (pH, EC, DO, TH, Ca2+, Mg2+, Na+, K+, Ca2+, Mg2+, , Cl, , F, and ) were utilized for the calculation of WQI. Based on WQI values, water is classified into five classes such as very poor (>100), poor (76–100), moderate (51–75), good (26–50) and excellent (<25) (Karmakar et al. 2024).

Nutrient pollution index (NPI)

The NPI is an easy to use yet trustworthy technique for the determination of nutrient load in surface water bodies. Nitrate and phosphate enter into rivers mostly through discharge of domestic waste water, agricultural runoff, and fish culture. The NPI was calculated using the following formula by Isiuku & Enyoh (2020):
where Cn and Cp represent the concentration of and in water, whereas the maximum allowable concentration is represented by MACN/P (WHO 2017), i.e. 50 and 5 mg/L for nitrate and phosphate, respectively. Based on NPI values, water pollution is categorized into four types: no (<1), moderate (1– < 3), considerable (>3 ≤ 6) and very high (>6).

Water quality assessment for irrigational uses

The water quality of Basuhi River was also compared with the international standard given by the Food and Agricultural Organization (FAO 1994) for suitability of agricultural use. The Basuhi River water is generally used for irrigation of agricultural lands. Therefore, evaluation of the fitness of water for irrigational uses is very important by using the following indices: PI, SSP, KR, CAI, SAR, and MAR to evaluate the suitability of water for irrigational uses.

Permeability index (PI)

The PI is used to evaluate the suitability of water for irrigation, particularly its effect on soil permeability. A higher PI value indicates better water quality for maintaining soil structure and permeability. It is calculated based on the concentrations of sodium, calcium, magnesium, and bicarbonate ions in water (Equation (3)) (all ionic concentrations are expressed in meq/L).

Soluble sodium percentage (SSP)

The SSP is used to assess the sodium hazard in irrigational water. It is calculated as the ratio of sodium and bicarbonate to the total cations (sodium, calcium, and magnesium) in the water (Equation (4)) (all ionic concentrations expressed in meq/L).

PI and SSP were both used for the assessment of water movement and sodium hazards respectively, according to Doneen (1964) and Abugu et al. (2021) and are calculated as follows:
(3)
(4)

Kelly ratio (KR)

The KR is an index used to evaluate the suitability of water for irrigation by assessing the sodium concentration relative to calcium and magnesium. A KR greater than 1 indicates excessive sodium, which can be harmful to soil structure and crop productivity. The KR is an important index used to define suitability of water for irrigational purposes and was calculated using the equation given by Kelly (1963):
(5)

Chloro-alkaline index (CAI)

The CAI is utilized to identify potential sources of chloride and other alkaline substances in water. A positive CAI value indicates the dominance of alkaline earth metals over chloride, while a negative value suggests the reverse, indicating potential water-rock interaction. The following equation is used to calculate the CAI, which assesses the base exchange of cations and anions:
(6)

Sodium adsorption ratio (SAR)

The SAR is an important parameter for assessing the suitability of water for irrigation based on its sodium content relative to calcium and magnesium. High SAR values can lead to soil sodicity, reducing soil permeability and harming plant growth. The SAR is generally used to evaluate water suitability for various purposes (drinking and irrigation) using the following formula given by Achite et al. (2024) (all ionic concentration expressed in meq/L):
(7)

Magnesium adsorption ratio (MAR)

The MAR assesses the magnesium hazard of irrigation water by comparing the calcium concentration in water. A high MAR value indicates potential soil permeability issues, as excess magnesium can adversely affect soil structure and crop productivity. MAR is also used to classify the irrigational water based on calcium and magnesium levels and is calculated in the following formula, initially coined by Raghunath (1987):
(8)

Multivariate statistical analysis

The descriptive statistical analysis of observed physico-chemical parameters in river water was evaluated using software (PAST 4.3). PCA and PCC were also performed to the find the existing relationship between the parameters and their regulating effects on water quality.

Quality assurance

During the experiment, analytical grade chemical/reagent were used for better accuracy and precision. Standard methods were used for water quality analysis given by APHA (2017). Before the physicochemical analysis of water samples, the equipment was standardized with deionized water to ensure accurate results. Blank and replicate readings were also analysed at all sampling locations to ensure quality control assurance (Shammi et al. 2023). These values also were carefully record for identified reference values and exact concentration of the analyzed samples.

The summary of statistical analysis including average, minimum, maximum and standard deviation of analyzed physicochemical parameters in the water of Basuhi River is presented in Table 1. The pH plays a crucial role in measuring quality of water and its impact on human health and aquatic life (Dewangan et al. 2023). The mean pH value at various sampling sites was varied from 7.50 to 9.10 and 6.57 to 8.69 in the pre- and post-monsoon seasons, respectively. The pH value was found beyond the limit (8.5) prescribed by WHO (2017) and BIS (2012) in 58.82 and 5.88% of samples in pre- and post-monsoon season, respectively, probably due to dilution brought about by the surface run off. Noticeably, the pH of the study area in both seasons was found neutral to alkaline in nature. The higher pH at a few locations could be connected with the domestic and industrial inputs. The pH of Kali River varied between 6.93 to 7.43 in the summer and 7.04 and 7.47 in the winter season, similar results were also found by Shukur et al. (2024) in the Tigris River, Iraq. Electrical conductivity (EC) also plays a crucial role in water suitability for domestic and irrigation (Ahmed et al. 2020). EC values in both seasons was obtained in the range of 389–844 and 320.9–856 μs/cm, respectively with corresponding averages of 598 and 433 μs/cm. The measured value of EC at most of the locations fall within the permissible (1,500 μs/cm) and desirable limits (750 μs/cm) of WHO (2017) and BIS (2012), only two (11.76%) water samples exceeded the standard limit (750 μs/cm). Basuhi river falls under type 1 water class on the basis of observed EC values with low salt enrichment.

Table 1

Mean concentration of physicochemical parameters

ParametersMean ± SD
Max
Min
FAOWHO (2017) 
BIS (2012) 
PrePostPrePostPrePostHighest permissibleMax. desirableHighest permissibleMax. desirable
pH 8.52 ± 0.42 8.01 ± 0.46 9.1 8.69 7.5 6.57 6.5–8.4 6.5–9.2 7.0–8.5 6.5–8.5 N.R. 
EC 598 ± 118 433 ± 165.29 841 856 389 320.9 3,000 1,500 750 – – 
DO 5.29 ± 0.97 7.10 ± 1.19 9.33 4.48 NA     
TH 172.4 ± 33.30 183.53 ± 68.95 245 412 95.5 76 200–500 500 100 600 200 
Na+ 11.36 ± 4.34 12.81 ± 5.83 23 28.1 4.1 6.3 0–920 200 50 – – 
K+ 2.37 ± 1.85 3.08 ± 1.76 7.5 7.8 0.85 0.7 NA 200 100 – – 
Ca2+ 51.04 ± 30.89 82.52 ± 34.19 112.26 168 12.26 46.2 0–400 200 75 200 75 
Mg2+ 37.97 ± 21.34 49.91 ± 15.76 87.5 82.56 13.7 8.8 0–60 150 30 100 30 
 62.64 ± 22.66 74.47 ± 31.14 114.5 147 23.5 47 0–610 600 200 600 200 
Cl 24.73 ± 10.22 10.09 ± 5.24 51.98 24.026 12 4.004 0–1,065 600 250 1000 250 
 84.17 ± 44.28 84.39 ± 43.58 169.15 178.82 11.60552 19.3 0–960 600 200 400 200 
 0.52 ± 0.28 1.32 ± 1.23 1.159 3.613 0.198 0.0123 NA     
F 0.40 ± 0.14 0.532 ± 0.174 0.71 0.95 0.19 0.32 NA 1.5 0.6–0.9 1.5 
 3.01 ± 1.64 1.763 ± 0.83 8.765 3.8 0.355723 0.48 0–10 50 – N.R. 45 
ParametersMean ± SD
Max
Min
FAOWHO (2017) 
BIS (2012) 
PrePostPrePostPrePostHighest permissibleMax. desirableHighest permissibleMax. desirable
pH 8.52 ± 0.42 8.01 ± 0.46 9.1 8.69 7.5 6.57 6.5–8.4 6.5–9.2 7.0–8.5 6.5–8.5 N.R. 
EC 598 ± 118 433 ± 165.29 841 856 389 320.9 3,000 1,500 750 – – 
DO 5.29 ± 0.97 7.10 ± 1.19 9.33 4.48 NA     
TH 172.4 ± 33.30 183.53 ± 68.95 245 412 95.5 76 200–500 500 100 600 200 
Na+ 11.36 ± 4.34 12.81 ± 5.83 23 28.1 4.1 6.3 0–920 200 50 – – 
K+ 2.37 ± 1.85 3.08 ± 1.76 7.5 7.8 0.85 0.7 NA 200 100 – – 
Ca2+ 51.04 ± 30.89 82.52 ± 34.19 112.26 168 12.26 46.2 0–400 200 75 200 75 
Mg2+ 37.97 ± 21.34 49.91 ± 15.76 87.5 82.56 13.7 8.8 0–60 150 30 100 30 
 62.64 ± 22.66 74.47 ± 31.14 114.5 147 23.5 47 0–610 600 200 600 200 
Cl 24.73 ± 10.22 10.09 ± 5.24 51.98 24.026 12 4.004 0–1,065 600 250 1000 250 
 84.17 ± 44.28 84.39 ± 43.58 169.15 178.82 11.60552 19.3 0–960 600 200 400 200 
 0.52 ± 0.28 1.32 ± 1.23 1.159 3.613 0.198 0.0123 NA     
F 0.40 ± 0.14 0.532 ± 0.174 0.71 0.95 0.19 0.32 NA 1.5 0.6–0.9 1.5 
 3.01 ± 1.64 1.763 ± 0.83 8.765 3.8 0.355723 0.48 0–10 50 – N.R. 45 

Note: Results are expressed in mg/L except pH and EC (μs/cm).

The DO is the most important parameter in the surface water bodies for the survival of aquatic life (Guemmaz et al. 2020). The concentration of DO in Basuhi River was found between 4.12 and 8.30 and 4.48 and 9.33 mg/L during pre- and post-monsoon, respectively, whereas the corresponding average was 5.29 and 7.10 mg/L. The DO value in six (35.29%) samples in pre-monsoon and two (11.75%) samples in post-monsoon season were found lower than 5 mg/L. Highest DO was observed at S3 (8.30) during pre-monsoon and S14 (9.33) during post-monsoon while it was lowest at S13 (4.12 mg/L) during pre-monsoon and S8 (4.48 mg/L) in post-monsoon season. High temperatures, rapid organic matter decomposition, and sluggish water flow contributed to reduced DO levels in the water during pre-monsoon, while higher DO levels were observed during the post-monsoon season, attributed to the cooler temperatures (Patel & Parikh 2013). The DO levels lower than 8 mg/L can affect the physical and biological processes in aquatic ecosystems and <5 mg/L represents the highly contaminated category of water. The DO level in the present study indicated that the river water is ‘healthy’ to ‘highly contaminated’.

Total hardness of the water is an indicator of usability of water, whether for domestic, industrial or agricultural purposes. Total hardness in water is generally found due to dissolved minerals, magnesium and calcium ions (Ustaoğlu et al. 2020). The investigated mean value of TH varied between 95.5 to 245 and 76 to 412 mg/L in both seasons and the corresponding averages were 172.4 and 183.53 mg/L. Total hardness in all locations in both seasons was found to be above the recommended limits given by WHO (2017) and BIS (2012). Based on the TH classification as given by Tiwari et al. (2017), 82.35% of samples in pre-monsoon and 87.23% of samples post- monsoon were found to be ‘hard’ water type. Prolonged exposure to hard water may elevate the risk of certain cancers, anencephaly, urolithiasis, prenatal mortality, and cardiovascular disease (Li et al. 2022). Analyzed physicochemical data with standard deviation (n = 3) in both seasons are provided in Supplementary material, Tables S2 and S3.

Physicochemical parameters such as pH, electrical conductivity, dissolved oxygen, and total hardness in the Basuhi River reveal significant seasonal variations. The pH and electrical conductivity limits were exceeded in most samples during the pre-monsoon season, likely due to the prevalence of hard water.

Major ion chemistry

The chemistry of major ions of the river water (Na+, K+, Mg2+, Ca2+, , Cl, and ) is helpful in studying the evaporation pattern, weathering processes, and impact of anthropogenic activities in the river basin. Land use patterns influence the seasonal variation of major ion chemistry in river water (Bahar & Yamamuro 2008). The average value with minimum, maximum of analyzed major cations and anions in the Basuhi river water are depicted in Table 1. Ca2+ Mg2+, and were identified as dominating ions in both seasons. Calcium and magnesium are naturally present in the surface and groundwater in the form of bicarbonate and sulphate and chloride (Singh & Noori 2022a, 2022b). The abundance of cations during pre-monsoon were found in the order of Ca2+ (50%) > Mg2+ (37%) > Na+ (11%) > K+ (2%), whereas, in post-monsoon season it was Ca2+ (55%) > Mg2+ (34%) > Na+ (9%) > K+ (2%) (Figure 2). Major cations Na+, K+, Ca2+, Mg2+ concentration during pre-monsoon season ranged between 4.1–23, 0.85–7.5, 12.26–112.26, 13.7–87.5 mg/L and 6.3–28.1, 0.7–7.8, 46.2–168, 8.8–82.56 mg/L during post monsoon, respectively. Singh & Noori (2022a, 2022b) observed similar findings in groundwater at Kabul River basin, Afganistan.
Figure 2

Contribution of cations (a) and (b) and anions (c) and (d) to the total cationic and anionic balance in Basuhi River water.

Figure 2

Contribution of cations (a) and (b) and anions (c) and (d) to the total cationic and anionic balance in Basuhi River water.

Close modal

Dissolved Ca2+ and Mg2+ were found below the highest permissible limit prescribed by WHO (2017). Ca2+ exceeded the maximum desirable limit in four (23.52%) samples in pre-monsoon and 7 (41.17%) samples in post-monsoon season, whereas, Mg2+ concentration in nine (52.94%) and 16 (94.11%) samples exceeded the maximum desirable limit (30 mg/L) pre- and post-monsoon, respectively. Highest concentrations of Ca2+ and Mg2+ were found at S16 and S4 in pre-monsoon, whereas in post-monsoon season, the highest concentration was recorded at S4 and S2. Consumption of demineralized (lack of calcium, magnesium, sodium, etc.) water was found to be associated with brittleness of nails, headache, nausea, leg and abdominal cramps, whereas higher concentrations of calcium and magnesium can cause urolithiasis, anencephaly, prenatal mortality, and certain types of cancer (Li et al. 2022). The weathering of carbonate rocks accounts for two-thirds of the Ca2+ in river water (Wang et al. 2021a, 2021b). The Basuhi River has an oversupply of calcium over magnesium due to the weathering of sedimentary rocks that contain a high proportion Mg2+ and Ca2+. Similar trends were also observed by Wang et al. (2021a, 2021b). Weathering of carbonate rocks contributed to high calcium levels. Elevated Ca2+ and Mg2+ at certain sites were attributed to agricultural runoff and industrial effluents, with potential health risks including urolithiasis and prenatal mortality (Li et al. 2022).

The higher levels of Na+ and K+ in river water are primarily due to the weathering of silicate minerals and rainfall. Sodium and potassium concentration at all the locations and in both the seasons was found higher than the recommended limit given by WHO (2017) and BIS (2012). Higher sodium intake in the human body adversely affects the heart, blood pressure and kidney failure, whereas higher K+ consumption can reduce blood pressure (Kogure et al. 2021). Sodium enters water as a result of the weathering of rocks and soil. Sodium compounds are highly soluble and do not form precipitates like Ca2+ and Mg2+ (Ravi et al. 2023). Sodium rich water can engage in acid base-exchange reactions and replace other ions in minerals present in clay soil. Potassium and sodium behave differently during base-exchange processes; sodium stays in water for a long period, whereas K+ participate in the weathering of soil and clay minerals (Zhao et al. 2023). Elevated sodium levels pose risks to human health, including heart and kidney issues, while higher potassium intake may lower blood pressure (Kogure et al. 2021).

The anionic abundance was found in the order of (45%) > (39%) > Cl (14) > (<1%) > F (<1%) and (49%) > (43%) > Cl (6%) > (1%) F (<1%) during pre-monsoon and post-monsoon, respectively (Figure 2). The anions , , Cl, , F, and during pre-monsoon season was found in the range of 23.5–114.5, 1–51.98, 11.60–169.15, 0.198–1.598, 0.19–0.71 and 0.35–8.76 mg/L and during post monsoon period it ranged between 47–147, 4–24.02, 19.3–178.82, 0.012–3.61, 0.32–0.95, and 0.048–3.8 mg/L. Noticeably, , Cl, , and were found the within the permissible limits recommended by WHO (2017) and BIS (2012).

Bicarbonates are indirectly generated in the form of CO2 by the respiration process in rivers. The obtained bicarbonate levels may be attributed to the respiration of aquatic life and irrigation with calcium rich water (Naorem et al. 2022). find its entry into the river mostly through the weathering of rocks (gypsum and anhydrite) in the river basin, besides biodegradation of organic matter and precipitation. The higher sulphate concentration may cause diarrhea and dehydration in human (Sharma & Kumar 2020). The anion composition of the Basuhi River was dominated by and in both pre- and post-monsoon seasons, because of weathering of rocks and biodegradation processes (Sharma & Kumar 2020). Bicarbonate levels in water are linked to aquatic respiration and calcium-rich irrigation (Naorem et al. 2022).

The Cl content in river water is mainly assigned to precipitation, halite deposit dissolution, and runoff from cities and farms. The elevated content of chloride in water can be toxic to aquatic life and inhibits vegetation growth (Parveen et al. 2022).

Mineral weathering (fluorspar, apatite, and fluorite), as well as sewage and biomedical waste discharge, mostly contribute to F levels in water. Fluoride is an essential micronutrient at 0.5–1.5 mg/L, but higher levels can cause dental and skeletal fluorosis in humans (Makete et al. 2022). Fluoride concentration in water samples was found below 1.5 mg/L at all locations.

Phosphates play a crucial role in aquatic ecosystems by serving nutrients for the growth of plant and algae. The concentration was found to be greater than 0.3 mg/L at all the sampling sites in both the seasons except at two sampling stations during pre-monsoon. Higher phosphate concentration is mainly due to agricultural runoff and wastewater discharge in river water (Neal et al. 2010). Phosphate-rich agricultural fertilizers and household detergents can contribute PO4 in water, which causes eutrophication in surface water bodies (Fadiran et al. 2008). Higher Cl concentrations in river water, primarily due to urban runoff and halite dissolution, pose risks to aquatic life (Parveen et al. 2022). More than 0.3 mg/L phosphate concentration at most of the sites is probably due to agricultural runoff, contributing to eutrophication (Fadiran et al. 2008; Neal et al. 2010).

Calcium, magnesium, bicarbonate, and sulphate ions dominated pre- and post-monsoon seasons. This significant seasonal variation in ions concentration is linked to weathering, agricultural runoff, and industrial effluents, with a notable oversupply of calcium and magnesium posing potential health risks. The findings provide critical insights into the anthropogenic impacts on ion dynamics and their implications for water quality and human health in the river basin.

The ions concentration was found within the limit of FAO (1994) except pH & Mg2+ in both seasons, indicating that at present the quality of water is fit for irrigational use.

Water quality assessment for irrigational uses

Several indices (NPI, PI, KR, SSP, SAR, CAI, and MAR) were used to evaluate the applicability of river water for irrigational use using concentrations of , Cl, Na+, K+, Ca2+ and Mg2+ ions (Table 2).

Table 2

Assessment of Basuhi River for irrigational purpose (pre-monsoon and post-monsoon season)

Sample codePre-monsoon
Post-monsoon
PISSPCAIKRSARMARPISSPCAIKRSARMAR
S1 24.23 17.10 0.47 0.19 3.35 46.32 9.01 9.17 −1.35 0.05 1.07 39.85 
S2 20.21 16.49 0.47 0.18 3.40 25.22 13.33 10.71 −0.20 0.12 3.63 34.39 
S3 24.77 15.48 0.81 0.16 2.35 33.50 9.18 7.14 −1.05 0.05 1.34 34.38 
S4 12.42 7.93 0.02 0.07 2.03 46.45 14.20 10.21 −0.42 0.10 2.97 21.10 
S5 20.81 12.75 0.72 0.13 2.19 44.90 11.66 7.94 −2.45 0.06 1.42 37.00 
S6 56.44 44.87 −1.11 0.74 8.24 60.65 12.23 8.28 −1.42 0.06 1.49 49.88 
S7 38.19 22.79 0.04 0.27 3.64 30.06 16.88 11.98 −0.69 0.12 2.48 37.94 
S8 29.79 20.89 0.42 0.25 3.42 57.67 20.06 15.25 −0.20 0.15 2.98 51.72 
S9 12.47 7.33 0.53 0.07 1.67 33.11 19.57 13.14 −0.15 0.12 2.11 11.58 
S10 23.84 18.50 0.24 0.16 2.58 39.34 16.27 7.97 −0.27 0.07 1.55 37.60 
S11 15.86 13.17 0.04 0.11 2.27 46.91 24.47 21.51 −2.24 0.21 3.89 37.43 
S12 21.06 14.68 0.20 0.16 2.73 70.89 9.71 7.93 −0.95 0.05 1.25 40.25 
S13 11.66 5.54 0.76 0.05 0.99 22.61 22.36 14.69 −0.23 0.15 2.70 46.27 
S14 10.10 5.34 0.75 0.04 0.80 39.85 17.04 13.35 −1.03 0.14 3.21 44.23 
S15 28.81 18.63 0.37 0.19 2.76 40.34 12.55 8.52 −0.49 0.08 1.80 44.11 
S16 13.57 11.95 0.44 0.09 2.09 24.94 13.47 9.22 0.19 0.08 1.77 40.94 
S17 13.37 9.78 0.47 0.07 1.40 86.23 20.01 12.86 −0.86 0.14 2.73 41.78 
Sample codePre-monsoon
Post-monsoon
PISSPCAIKRSARMARPISSPCAIKRSARMAR
S1 24.23 17.10 0.47 0.19 3.35 46.32 9.01 9.17 −1.35 0.05 1.07 39.85 
S2 20.21 16.49 0.47 0.18 3.40 25.22 13.33 10.71 −0.20 0.12 3.63 34.39 
S3 24.77 15.48 0.81 0.16 2.35 33.50 9.18 7.14 −1.05 0.05 1.34 34.38 
S4 12.42 7.93 0.02 0.07 2.03 46.45 14.20 10.21 −0.42 0.10 2.97 21.10 
S5 20.81 12.75 0.72 0.13 2.19 44.90 11.66 7.94 −2.45 0.06 1.42 37.00 
S6 56.44 44.87 −1.11 0.74 8.24 60.65 12.23 8.28 −1.42 0.06 1.49 49.88 
S7 38.19 22.79 0.04 0.27 3.64 30.06 16.88 11.98 −0.69 0.12 2.48 37.94 
S8 29.79 20.89 0.42 0.25 3.42 57.67 20.06 15.25 −0.20 0.15 2.98 51.72 
S9 12.47 7.33 0.53 0.07 1.67 33.11 19.57 13.14 −0.15 0.12 2.11 11.58 
S10 23.84 18.50 0.24 0.16 2.58 39.34 16.27 7.97 −0.27 0.07 1.55 37.60 
S11 15.86 13.17 0.04 0.11 2.27 46.91 24.47 21.51 −2.24 0.21 3.89 37.43 
S12 21.06 14.68 0.20 0.16 2.73 70.89 9.71 7.93 −0.95 0.05 1.25 40.25 
S13 11.66 5.54 0.76 0.05 0.99 22.61 22.36 14.69 −0.23 0.15 2.70 46.27 
S14 10.10 5.34 0.75 0.04 0.80 39.85 17.04 13.35 −1.03 0.14 3.21 44.23 
S15 28.81 18.63 0.37 0.19 2.76 40.34 12.55 8.52 −0.49 0.08 1.80 44.11 
S16 13.57 11.95 0.44 0.09 2.09 24.94 13.47 9.22 0.19 0.08 1.77 40.94 
S17 13.37 9.78 0.47 0.07 1.40 86.23 20.01 12.86 −0.86 0.14 2.73 41.78 

Permeability index (PI)

Prolonged use of ion rich water in agriculture adversely affects the soil permeability. The PI was calculated taking consideration of the Ca2+, Mg2+, Na+, and concentration in river water (Shammi et al. 2023). Water having PI ≥ 75% is considered suitable and lower than 25% is regarded as unfit for irrigation. Doneen (1964) classified the PI in three classes; class I, II and III (Supplementary material, Table S1). The PI during pre-monsoon falls in classes I and II, while the post-monsoon season falls in only class I, i.e. suitable for irrigational use. High bicarbonate and sodium ion in water is directly related to the PI due to exchange of carbonate dissolution (Xu et al. 2019). Shammi et al. (2023) also highlight the impact of ions on soil permeability, underscoring the importance of managing bicarbonate and sodium concentration in agricultural water.

Kelley ratio (KR)

The KR represents the abundance of Na+ against Ca2+ and Mg2+. The KR is another criterion for evaluating water suitability for irrigation applications, KR >1 characterizes unsuitability of water due to excess sodium, whereas water having KR <1 is considered suitable for irrigation (Hoque et al. 2022). The KR value varied between 0.03–0.73 and 0.04–0.21 during pre- and post-monsoon seasons, respectively. KR of all the water samples indicates their suitability for irrigational application. Ravi et al. (2023) found similar results of KR (0.03 to 0.18) while working on Ghaghra River, India. The lower KR values reflect an appropriate balance of sodium relative to calcium and magnesium, reducing the risk of soil degradation due to excess sodium (Hoque et al. 2022).

Magnesium adsorption ratio (MAR)

The MAR has been conventionally used to quantify the negative impacts of magnesium on agricultural water. MAR is calculated by considering the Ca2+ and Mg2+ concentration in water. In pre-monsoon season the MAR value of Basuhi River was found to be 22.61–86.23, whereas in post-monsoon it was recorded as 11.57–51.71 with corresponding mean values of 44.05 and 38.26. MAR of 23.52% water samples during pre-monsoon was found to be >50 and was found to be unsuitable for irrigation, whereas during post-monsoon only one (5.88%) sample was found unsuitable. Raghunath (1987) emphasized that high MAR negatively affects crop yields and increases soil alkalinity, consistent with findings in other agricultural regions.

Chloro-alkaline index (CAI)

The CAI in irrigation studies assesses the proportion of chloro alkanes present in environmental samples to determine the level of contamination. High CAI values may indicate pollution from industrial and agricultural activities, potentially threatening soil health, crop quality, and groundwater resources. This contamination can have significant implications for agricultural sustainability and food safety.

The CAI gives the information about ion exchange between water and rocks. It considers the ion exchange between K+, Na+ with Mg2+ and Ca2+. The positive value of CAI implies that the Na+/K+ exchanged with Ca2+/Mg2+, while negative values exhibit Ca2+/Mg2+ exchanged with Na+/K+ (Shamsuddin et al. 2019). The range of CAI was found to be −1.11 to 0.80 and −2.44 to 0.18 during pre- and post-monsoon season, respectively. In pre-monsoon season the CAI value at all the studied locations was found to be positive except at S6 (–1.11). These negative results may be due to the presence of calcite and dolomite minerals on the riverbed or the surrounding geology which enhances calcium/magnesium concentration, whereas in the post-monsoon the CAI value at all locations was found to be negative except at S16 (CAI = 0.18). This can occur due to sodium/potassium rich minerals (feldspars) and other anthropogenic sources of Na+ and K+. During pre-monsoon season the majority of samples have CAI values representing cations exchange (Na+/K+ exchange with Ca2+/Mg2+), whereas in post-monsoon 95% of the samples showed negative CAI values, which indicates the rigorous involvement of cations (Ca2+/Mg2+ replaced with Na+/K+) in the ion exchange process. It has been reported that the concentration of alkaline earth metals (Ca2+ + Mg2+) is inversely related to the levels of alkali metals (Na+ + K+) (Abugu et al. 2021).

Sodium adsorption ratio (SAR)

The SAR is a key factor used for the evaluation of appropriateness of water for irrigation (Kadri et al. 2022). It is calculated by considering the concentration of Na+, Ca2+ and Mg2+ in water. The SAR predicts the hazard in soil and plants due to higher sodium contents in the water. Higher sodium concentrations in water can inhibit the absorption of water by plants and soil permeability (Gautam et al. 2023). Based on the SAR score, water can be classified as ‘good’ (0–6), ‘doubtful’ (6–9) and ‘unsuitable’ (>9) for irrigation. The SAR values in the present study were found in the range of 0.8–8.24 and 1.06–3.88 during pre- and post-monsoon seasons, respectively. SAR score at all the sampling sites fell under the ‘good’ category except at one location during pre-monsoon (SAR = 8.24) representing its suitability for a wide range of crops (Tsado et al. 2014). The findings aligned with the study conducted by Kadri et al. (2022) and Gautam et al. (2023), which emphasize the negative impact of high sodium levels on soil and plant health.

Soluble sodium percentage (SSP)

The sodium concentration is essential for determining the water suitability for irrigational use due to its reactivity and influence on soil permeability and structure. Na+ levels in water are usually expressed in soluble sodium percentage (SSP) and percentage sodium (%Na). SSP was calculated using the formula given by Wilcox (1955) and Richards (1954). On the basis of percentage, sodium in irrigation water can be classified as ‘unsuitable’ (>80), ‘doubtful’ (60–80), ‘permissible’ (40–60), ‘good’ (20–40), and ‘excellent’ (<20). In the present study, SAR values during the pre-monsoon season were categorized as good (82.35%), permissible (11.76%), and excellent (5.8%), while during the post-monsoon season, all sampling locations were classified as excellent category, probably due to the addition of fresh water due to rainfall. The influx of fresh water reduces sodium concentrations and improves soil permeability (Kumar et al. 2021).

Water quality assessment for human consumption

Water quality index (WQI)

The range (mean) of WQI in the river water was found to be 53.57–77.77 (62.33) and 55.11–100.86 (67.29) in pre- and post-monsoon, respectively (Figure 3 and Table 3). The highest WQI during pre-monsoon was found at S4 (WQI = 77.77) while the highest WQI during post-monsoon season was recorded at S3 (WQI = 100.86). The WQI was classified based on a scale (1–100) as follows: ‘very poor’ (>100), ‘poor’ (76–100), ‘moderate’ (51–75), ‘good’ (26–50), ‘excellent’ (<25) for drinking. During pre-monsoon at all the locations WQI was found to be of moderate category except at S4 (near the industrial area of Satharia), whereas in post-monsoon season 82.35, 11.76, and 5.88% of samples fell under ‘moderate’, ‘poor’ and ‘very poor’ category, respectively. The spatial variation of WQI during pre-monsoon season was observed to be ‘moderate’ to ‘poor’, whereas during post-monsoon it was found to be ‘moderate’ to ‘very poor’ (Figure 3). WQI of the Ghaghra River was reported to be ‘excellent’ to ‘unsuitable’ for drinking by Ravi et al. (2023). Locations S1, S2, and S3 in post-monsoon and S4 in pre-monsoon seasons were found to be most polluted majorly due to industrial and agricultural interventions and are thus found to be unfit for human consumption. When the concentration of a parameter exceeds the allowed limit, the WQI value rises at the same rate. Several anthropogenic actions, including untreated/partially treated effluents, agricultural runoff, and domestic waste, all contribute to the higher WQI. The water quality can be attributed to increased runoff and pollution during the monsoon, which often carries agricultural and industrial pollutants into the river (Ravi et al. 2023). The high variability was observed in the river by Kumar et al. (2021) which was significantly impacted due to several anthropogenic activities, particularly industrial and agricultural sources. The findings are consistent with national and international studies, highlighting the need for comprehensive water quality management strategies to address the growing pollution pressures on freshwater resources.
Table 3

Water quality index and nutrient pollution index during pre- and post-monsoon

Sample codeWQI
NPI
Pre-monsoonPost-monsoonPre-monsoonPost-monsoon
S1 58.825 76.57 0.110672 0.623971 
S2 60.12 96.57 0.274329 0.625439 
S3 56.41 100.86 0.14308 0.60456 
S4 77.77 61.09 0.129447 0.744742 
S5 56.57 61.09 0.101235 0.020271 
S6 58.31 58.57 0.263222 0.120471 
S7 63.6 60.04 0.240907 0.093122 
S8 53.72 67.94 0.111983 0.29255 
S9 65.106 55.11 0.116783 0.142636 
S10 56.36 64.43 0.16716 0.047642 
S11 65.59 64 0.125835 0.49544 
S12 53.57 61.02 0.169402 0.140156 
S13 61.81 58.7 0.111695 0.059174 
S14 69.85 63.85 0.1404 0.17231 
S15 58.65 69.45 0.12157 0.574457 
S16 73.97 61.22 0.286004 0.138516 
S17 69.37 63.42 0.175252 0.192985 
Sample codeWQI
NPI
Pre-monsoonPost-monsoonPre-monsoonPost-monsoon
S1 58.825 76.57 0.110672 0.623971 
S2 60.12 96.57 0.274329 0.625439 
S3 56.41 100.86 0.14308 0.60456 
S4 77.77 61.09 0.129447 0.744742 
S5 56.57 61.09 0.101235 0.020271 
S6 58.31 58.57 0.263222 0.120471 
S7 63.6 60.04 0.240907 0.093122 
S8 53.72 67.94 0.111983 0.29255 
S9 65.106 55.11 0.116783 0.142636 
S10 56.36 64.43 0.16716 0.047642 
S11 65.59 64 0.125835 0.49544 
S12 53.57 61.02 0.169402 0.140156 
S13 61.81 58.7 0.111695 0.059174 
S14 69.85 63.85 0.1404 0.17231 
S15 58.65 69.45 0.12157 0.574457 
S16 73.97 61.22 0.286004 0.138516 
S17 69.37 63.42 0.175252 0.192985 
Figure 3

Water quality index variation during pre- and post-monsoon season in Basuhi River.

Figure 3

Water quality index variation during pre- and post-monsoon season in Basuhi River.

Close modal

Nutrient pollution index (NPI)

The NPI is used to measure possible combined effects of phosphate and nitrate on the ecological health of the river. This makes it easier to quickly evaluate the overall surface water quality. The calculated value of NPI is displayed in Table 3. NPI of river water during pre-monsoon season ranged between 0.10–0.28 (mean = 0.16), whereas in post-monsoon it was found to be 0.02–0.74 (mean = 0.29). The NPI value in both the seasons was found to be less than 1, representing the low nutrient load in the Basuhi River (Table 3). The highest value, i.e. 0.74, was found at S4 during post monsoon. The mean NPI in various water bodies was reported as five with seasonal variations of 1.58 and 8.2 during the dry and wet seasons, respectively (Isiuku & Enyoh 2020), whereas El Mountassir et al. (2022) observed NPI in the range of −0.9 to 7.8 while analyzing ground water.

Statistical analysis

Pearson correlations between analyzed parameters were determined using SPSS software at 0.01 and 0.05 significant levels, while PCA was applied for source identification.

Principal component analysis (PCA)

PCA is used to transform raw variables into new, uncorrelated variables called principal components, which are linear combinations of the original variables. It simplifies the original data into integrated variables known as principal components (PCs) (Ustaoğlu & Islam 2020). The PCA is a data reduction approach that employs correlation analysis to reduce numerous potentially linked small numbers of uncorrelated variables known as principal components or factors. In the present study, PCA was performed using 14 physicochemical parameters at 17 locations to find out probable sources that influence the quality of water. Based on an eigenvalue of >1, four PCs were extracted in both the seasons. The variance of PC1, PC2, PC3, and PC4 was found to be 96.75 and 98.68% during pre- and post-monsoon, respectively. Liu et al. (2003) classified three factors based on loading values such as ‘weak’ (0.50–0.30), ‘moderate’ (0.75–0.50), and ‘strong’ (>0.75). The eigenvalue and percent variance of the four extracted PC of both seasons are summarized in Supplementary material, Table S4. During pre-monsoon season PC1 exhibited strong positive correlation with EC (0.97), PC2 with SO4− (0.97), PC3 moderate positive correlation with TH (0.74) and negative correlation was found with Ca2+ (−0.58), PC4 was found moderately correlated with TH (0.63) and Ca2+ (0.65). In the post-monsoon season, PC1 and PC2 showed similar positive correlation with EC (0.92) and (0.93), respectively. PC3 was found to be strongly correlated with TH (0.82) and PC4 with (0.88). The prime sources of and are livestock dung and fertilizer containing agricultural runoff from surrounding areas (Kim et al. 2023). It has been demonstrated that sodium-potassium and calcium-magnesium have similar origins and good homology. Cl displayed weak negative loading, which suggests that anthropogenic activities have produced a significant amount of non-biodegradable trash. presence may be caused by detergent discharges in industrial effluents and municipal sewage (Igbinosa & Okoh 2009).

Correlation analysis

Pearson correlation was used to access the correlation between physicochemical parameters in river water during both seasons (Figure 4(a) and 4(b)). The positive correlation (>0.50) was found between EC with DO (0.54) and Mg2+ (0.54), F was found positively correlated with (0.61) during pre-monsoon, whereas negative correlation was observed between Na+ and with F (−0.52). During post-monsoon season, pH showed positive correlation with DO (0.84), EC with TH (0.52) and F (0.84), Na+ with Cl (0.69), Ca2+ with Mg2+ (0.56), whereas negative correlation was observed between pH with EC (−0.64), EC with DO (−0.83), DO with F (−0.55), and K+ with Cl (−0.56). The positive correlation among various variables indicates that the increases in the concentration of one variable may have a positive impact on the concentration of others and probably have similar origin sources (Kumar et al. 2020). These results indicate seasonal variations and complex interactions among river water parameters, influenced by hydrological and geochemical factors (Zhao et al. 2020; Sahoo & Sahu 2022).
Figure 4

Correlation matrix graph based on colour intensity during pre-monsoon (a) and post-monsoon (b) seasons.

Figure 4

Correlation matrix graph based on colour intensity during pre-monsoon (a) and post-monsoon (b) seasons.

Close modal

The seasonal variations in ion concentrations, particularly higher calcium, magnesium, and chloride levels, highlight the need for regulations on agricultural runoff and industrial effluents, especially pre-monsoon. Promoting sustainable farming practices, such as reducing phosphate-rich fertilizers, could help prevent nutrient loading and eutrophication. Public awareness campaigns on the risks of hard water and promoting water softening in affected areas are essential health interventions. Enhancing water treatment infrastructure in industrial and agricultural zones, along with continuous water quality monitoring and stricter enforcement of WHO (2017) and BIS (2012) standards, is crucial for long-term water quality management.

Surface water serves as a major source to fulfill irrigational needs and is a key component in groundwater recharge. Water quality of Basuhi River was analyzed to determine its fitness for domestic and agricultural usages. Findings demonstrated the abundance of cations in the order of Ca2+ > Mg2+ > Na+ > K+ during pre-monsoon and post-monsoon, whereas anionic abundance was found in the order of in both seasons. Anthropogenic inputs and chemical weathering may be held responsible for the observed ionic activities. Obtained WQI inferred the water quality variation from ‘moderate’ to ‘very poor’ category. Various irrigation suitability indices (PI, KR, SSP, SAR, CAI, and MAR) revealed that the majority of the samples are fit for irrigational uses. Multivariate approaches like PCA and CA were found to be effective and realistic in evaluating spatiotemporal changes in water quality and in detecting contamination sources. It is possible to reduce pollution from non-point sources by building wetlands, buffer strips, retention ponds, and sediment fences. Regular monitoring is recommended to avoid future toxicity chances. Findings shall be useful in determining the future costs of current/proposed development programs around the river basins.

The authors express gratitude to the Head of the Department of Environment Science at Babasaheb Bhimrao Ambedkar University (BBAU), Lucknow, for generously providing laboratory facilities.

Aneet Kumar Yadav: conceptualization, formal analysis; Monu Kumar: interpretation; Anita and Kamla Pat Raw: statistical analysis; Narendra Kumar: conceptualized, overall guidance and manuscript corrections.

All relevant data are included in the paper or its Supplementary Information.

The authors declare there is no conflict.

Abba
S. I.
,
Hadi
S. J.
,
Sammen
S. S.
,
Salih
S. Q.
,
Abdulkadir
R. A.
,
Pham
Q. B.
&
Yaseen
Z. M.
(
2020
)
Evolutionary computational intelligence algorithm coupled with self-tuning predictive model for water quality index determination
,
Journal of Hydrology
,
587
,
124974
.
Abdullah
E. J.
(
2013
)
Evaluation of surface water quality indices for heavy metals of Diyala River-Iraq
,
Journal of Natural Sciences Research
,
3
,
8
.
Abugu
H. O.
,
Egwuonwu
P. F.
,
Ihedioha
J. N.
&
Ekere
N. R.
(
2021
)
Hydrochemical evaluation of river Ajali water for irrigational application in agricultural farmland
,
Applied Water Science
,
11
,
1
14
.
Achite
M.
,
Katipoğlu
O. M.
,
Elshaboury
N.
,
Kartal
V.
,
Aktürk
G.
&
Ertugay
N.
(
2024
)
Modeling of irrigation water quality parameter (sodium adsorption ratio) using hybrid swarm intelligence-based neural networks in a semi-arid environment at SMBA dam, Algeria
,
Theoretical and Applied Climatology
,
155
(
8
),
8299
8318
.
Ahmed
M. T.
,
Hasan
M. Y.
,
Monir
M. U.
,
Samad
M. A.
,
Rahman
M. M.
,
Rifat
M. S. I.
&
Jamil
A. N.
(
2020
)
Evaluation of hydrochemical properties and groundwater suitability for irrigation uses in southwestern zones of Jashore, Bangladesh
,
Groundwater for Sustainable Development
,
11
,
100441
.
Akhtar
N.
,
Syakir Ishak
M. I.
,
Bhawani
S. A.
&
Umar
K.
(
2021
)
Various natural and anthropogenic factors responsible for water quality degradation: A review
,
Water
,
13
(
19
),
2660
.
Aminiyan
M. M.
,
Aitkenhead-Peterson
J.
&
Aminiyan
F. M.
(
2018
)
Evaluation of multiple water quality indices for drinking and irrigation purposes for the Karoon river, Iran
,
Environmental Geochemistry and Health
,
40
,
2707
2728
.
APHA
(
2017
)
Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater (23rd ed.)
,
Washington, DC, USA
:
American Public Health Association
.
BIS
I
. (
2012
)
10500:. Indian Standard Drinking Water-Specification (2nd revision)
.
New Delhi, India
:
Bureau of Indian Standards
(BIS)
.
Dewangan
S. K.
,
Toppo
D. N.
&
Kujur
A.
(
2023
)
Investigating the impact of pH levels on water quality: An experimental approach
,
International Journal for Research in Applied Science & Engineering Technology IJRASET
,
11
,
756
760
.
Doneen
L. D.
(
1964
)
Notes on Water Quality in Agriculture
.
Oakland, CA, USA
:
Department of Water Science and Engineering, University of California
.
El Mountassir
O.
,
Bahir
M.
,
Ouazar
D.
,
Chehbouni
A.
&
Carreira
P. M.
(
2022
)
Temporal and spatial assessment of groundwater contamination with nitrate using nitrate pollution index (NPI), groundwater pollution index (GPI), and GIS (case study: Essaouira basin
,
Morocco), Environmental Science and Pollution Research
,
1
18
.
Fadiran
A. O.
,
Dlamini
S. C.
&
Mavuso
A.
(
2008
)
A comparative study of the phosphate levels in some surface and ground water bodies of Swaziland
,
Bulletin of the Chemical Society of Ethiopia
,
22
,
2
.
FAO
. (
1994
)
Water Quality for Agriculture. Water Quality Guidelines
.
Rome, Italy
:
Food and Agricultural Organization
.
Gautam
V. K.
,
Pande
C. B.
,
Moharir
K. N.
,
Varade
A. M.
,
Rane
N. L.
,
Egbueri
J. C.
&
Alshehri
F.
(
2023
)
Prediction of sodium hazard of irrigation purpose using artificial neural network modelling
,
Sustainability
,
15
(
9
),
7593
.
Guemmaz
F.
,
Neffar
S.
&
Chenchouni
H
.
2020
Physicochemical and bacteriological quality of surface water resources receiving common wastewater effluents in drylands of Algeria
. In: Negm, A., Bouderbala, A., Chenchouni, H. & Barceló, D. (eds.)
Water Resources in Algeria – Part II: Water Quality, Treatment, Protection and Development
,
Cham, Switzerland: Springer
, pp.
117
148
.
https://doi.org/10.1007/698_2019_400
.
Guenouche
F. Z.
,
Mesbahi-Salhi
A.
,
Zegait
R.
,
Chouia
S.
,
Kimour
M. T.
&
Bouslama
Z.
(
2024
)
Assessing water quality in North-East Algeria: A comprehensive study using water quality index (WQI) and PCA
,
Water Practice & Technology
,
19
(
4
),
1232
1248
.
Hoque
M. M.
,
Islam
A.
,
Sarkar
B.
&
Saha
U. D
. (
2022
)
Assessing the surface and bottom river water quality for irrigation: a study of Damodar River
,
India. International Journal of Energy and Water Resources
,
8
,
545
562
.
Igbinosa
E. O.
&
Okoh
A. I.
(
2009
)
Impact of discharge wastewater effluents on the physico-chemical qualities of a receiving watershed in a typical rural community
,
International Journal of Environmental Science & Technology
,
6
,
175
182
.
Kadri
A.
,
Baouia
K.
,
Kateb
S.
,
Al-Ansari
N.
,
Kouadri
S.
,
Najm
H. M.
&
Khedher
K. M
. (
2022
)
Assessment of groundwater suitability for agricultural purposes: a case study of South Oued Righ region
,
Algeria. Sustainability
,
14
(
14
),
8858
.
Kelly
W. P.
(
1963
)
Use of saline irrigation water
,
Soil Science
,
95
(
4
),
355
391
.
Kim
H.
,
Park
J.
,
Kim
S.
,
Pawar
K. N.
&
Song
M.
(
2023
)
High efficiency of nitric acid controls in alleviating particulate nitrate in livestock and urban areas in South Korea
,
Environmental Science: Atmospheres
,
3
(
2
),
422
433
.
Kogure
M.
,
Nakaya
N.
,
Hirata
T.
,
Tsuchiya
N.
,
Nakamura
T.
,
Narita
A.
&
Hozawa
A.
(
2021
)
Sodium/potassium ratio change was associated with blood pressure change: Possibility of population approach for sodium/potassium ratio reduction in health checkup
,
Hypertension Research
,
44
(
2
),
225
231
.
Kome
G. K.
,
Enang
R. K.
,
Tabi
F. O.
&
Yerima
B. P. K.
(
2019
)
Influence of clay minerals on some soil fertility attributes: A review
,
Open Journal of Soil Science
,
9
(
9
),
155
188
.
Kumar
P.
,
Mahajan
A. K.
&
Kumar
A.
(
2020
)
Groundwater geochemical facie: Implications of rock-water interaction at the Chamba city HP, northwest Himalaya, India
,
Environmental Science and Pollution Research
,
27
,
9012
9026
.
Kumar
R.
,
Goyal
M. K.
,
Surampalli
R. Y.
&
Zhang
T. C.
(
2024
)
River pollution in India: Exploring regulatory and remedial paths
,
Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy
,
26
(
9
),
1
23
.
Liu
C. W.
,
Lin
K. H.
&
Kuo
Y. M
. (
2003
)
Application of factor analysis in the assessment of groundwater quality in a blackfoot disease area in Taiwan
,
Science of the Total Environment
,
313
(
1–3
),
77
89
.
Makete
N.
,
Rizzu
M.
,
Seddaiu
G.
,
Gohole
L.
&
Otinga
A.
(
2022
)
Fluoride toxicity in cropping systems: Mitigation, adaptation strategies and related mechanisms. A review
,
Science of the Total Environment
,
833
,
155129
.
Mokarram
M.
,
Saber
A.
&
Sheykhi
V.
(
2020
)
Effects of heavy metal contamination on river water quality due to release of industrial effluents
,
Journal of Cleaner Production
,
277
,
123380
.
Mupaso
N.
,
Makombe
G.
,
Mugandani
R.
&
Mafongoya
P. L.
(
2024
)
Assessing the contribution of smallholder irrigation to household food security in Zimbabwe
,
Agriculture
,
14
(
4
),
617
.
Naorem
A.
,
Jayaraman
S.
,
Dalal
R. C.
,
Patra
A.
,
Rao
C. S.
&
Lal
R.
(
2022
)
Soil inorganic carbon as a potential sink in carbon storage in dryland soils – a review
,
Agriculture
,
12
(
8
),
1256
.
Okereafor
U.
,
Makhatha
M.
,
Mekuto
L.
,
Uche-Okereafor
N.
,
Sebola
T.
&
Mavumengwana
V.
(
2020
)
Toxic metal implications on agricultural soils, plants, animals, aquatic life and human health
,
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
,
17
(
7
),
2204
.
Patel
V.
&
Parikh
P.
(
2013
)
Assessment of seasonal variation in water quality of River Mini, at Sindhrot, Vadodara
,
International Journal of Environmental Sciences
,
3
(
5
),
1424
1436
.
Parveen
N.
,
Chowdhury
S.
&
Goel
S
. (
2022
)
Environmental impacts of the widespread use of chlorine-based disinfectants during the COVID-19 pandemic
.
Environmental Science and Pollution Research
,
29
(
57
),
85742
85760
.
Poshtegal
M. K.
&
Mirbagheri
S. A.
(
2019
)
The heavy metals pollution index and water quality monitoring of the Zarrineh river, Iran
,
Environmental & Engineering Geoscience
,
25
(
2
),
179
188
.
Raghunath
H. M.
(
1987
)
Groundwater
.
New Delhi, India
:
Wiley Eastern Ltd.
, pp
344
369
.
Ravi
N. K.
,
Jha
P. K.
,
Varma
K.
,
Tripathi
P.
,
Gautam
S. K.
,
Ram
K.
&
Tripathi
V.
(
2023
)
Application of water quality index WQI and statistical techniques to assess water quality for drinking, irrigation, and industrial purposes of the Ghaghara River, India
,
Total Environment Research Themes
,
6
,
100049
.
Richards
L. M.
(
1954
)
Diagnosis and Improvement of Saline and Alkaline Soils
,
Agriculture Handbook
, No.
60
,
Riverside, CA, USA: U.S. Salinity Laboratory, USDA
.
Shahmirnoori
A.
,
Hasani Zonoozi
M.
&
Samadi
M.
(
2023
)
Evaluating groundwater quality using health risk assessment and irrigation indexes: Saveh Aquifer, Iran
,
Water Practice & Technology
,
18
(
12
),
3333
3346
.
Shammi
R. S.
,
Hossain
M. S.
,
Kabir
M. H.
,
Islam
M. S.
,
Taj
M. T. I.
,
Islam
M. S.
,
Sarker
M. E.
,
Hossain
M. S.
&
Idris
A. M.
(
2023
)
Hydrochemical appraisal of surface water from a subtropical urban river in southwestern Bangladesh using indices, GIS, and multivariate statistical analysis
,
Environmental Science and Pollution Research
,
30
(
2
),
3467
3489
.
Shamsuddin
M. K. N.
,
Sulaiman
W. N. A.
,
Ramli
M. F. B.
&
Kusin
F. M.
(
2019
)
Geochemical characteristic and water quality index of groundwater and surface water at Lower River Muda Basin, Malaysia
,
Arabian Journal of Geosciences
,
12
,
1
27
.
Sharma
M. K.
&
Kumar
M.
(
2020
)
Sulphate contamination in groundwater and its remediation: An overview
,
Environmental Monitoring and Assessment
,
192
,
1
10
.
Singh
A.
,
Sharma
A.
,
Verma
R. K.
,
Chopade
R. L.
,
Pandit
P. P.
,
Nagar
V.
,
Aseri
V.
,
Choudhary
S. K.
,
Awasthi
G.
,
Awasthi
K. K.
&
Sankhla
M. S.
(
2022
)
Heavy metal contamination of water and their toxic effect on living organisms
. In:
Dorta
D. J.
&
de Oliveira
D. P.
(eds)
The Toxicity of Environmental Pollutants
,
London, UK: IntechOpen
.
Singh
R. B.
,
Yurembam
G. S.
,
Jhajharia
D.
&
Kusre
B. C.
(
2024
)
Water quality assessment of Loktak Lake, Manipur using Landsat 9 imagery
,
Water Practice & Technology
,
19
(
1
), 2613–2631.
Syeed
M. M.
,
Hossain
M. S.
,
Karim
M. R.
,
Uddin
M. F.
,
Hasan
M.
&
Khan
R. H.
(
2023
)
Surface water quality profiling using the water quality index, pollution index and statistical methods: A critical review
,
Environmental and Sustainability Indicators
,
18
,
100247
.
Tiwari
A. K.
,
Singh
A. K.
,
Singh
A. K.
&
Singh
M. P.
(
2017
)
Hydrogeochemical analysis and evaluation of surface water quality of Pratapgarh district, Uttar Pradesh, India
,
Applied Water Science
,
7
,
1609
1623
.
Tsado
P. A.
,
Lawal
B. A.
,
Eze
P. C.
,
Afolabi
S. G.
,
Saidu
O. I.
&
Igwe
C. A.
(
2014
)
Assessment of the suitability of water quality for irrigation in Minna, Niger State
,
International Journal of Research in Agriculture and Forestry
,
1
(
2
),
13
17
.
Uddin
M. G.
,
Nash
S.
&
Olbert
A. I.
(
2021
)
A review of water quality index models and their use for assessing surface water quality
,
Ecological Indicators
,
122
,
107218
.
Uddin
M. R.
,
Khandaker
M. U.
,
Ahmed
S.
,
Abedin
M. J.
,
Hossain
S. M. M.
,
Al Mansur
M. A.
&
Idris
A. M.
(
2024
)
Assessment of coastal river water quality in Bangladesh: Implications for drinking and irrigation purposes
,
Plos One
,
19
(
4
),
e0300878
.
Ustaoğlu
F.
,
Taş
B.
,
Tepe
Y.
&
Topaldemir
H
. (
2021
)
Comprehensive assessment of water quality and associated health risk by using physicochemical quality indices and multivariate analysis in Terme River
,
Turkey. Environmental Science and Pollution Research
,
28
(
44
),
62736
62754
.
Wang
G.
,
Lu
J.
,
Li
W.
,
Ning
J.
,
Zhou
L.
,
Tong
Y.
&
Xiayihazi
N.
(
2021a
)
Seasonal variation and risk assessment of microplastics in surface water of the Manas River Basin, China
,
Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety
,
208
,
111477
.
Wang
J.
,
Xu
J.
,
Li
Y.
&
Yan
W.
(
2021b
). ‘
Provenances and controlling factors of solutes in surface runoff in the Tarim River Basin, Northwest China
’,
IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science
,
Vol. 821
,
No. 1
.
Bristol, UK
:
IOP Publishing
, p.
012016
.
WHO (World Health Organization)
(
2011
) Guidelines for drinking-water quality. WHO Chron, 4 (38),
104
108
.
WHO (World Health Organization)
(
2017
)
Guidelines for drinking-water quality: first addendum to the fourth edition
.
Geneva, Switzerland
:
World Health Organization
.
Wilcox
L. V
. (
1955
)
Classification and use of the irrigation waters, U.S. Department of Agriculture Circular No. 969
,
Washington, DC, USA
:
U.S. Department of Agriculture
.
Xu
P.
,
Feng
W.
,
Qian
H.
&
Zhang
Q
. (
2019
)
Hydrogeochemical characterization and irrigation quality assessment of shallow groundwater in the Central-Western Guanzhong Basin, China
.
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
,
16
(
9
),
1492
.
Yadav
A. K.
,
Anita
,
Kulsoom
M.
,
Kumar
M.
,
Pat Raw
K.
&
Kumar
N.
(
2024a
)
Health risk assessment due to heavy metal contamination in groundwater of Basuhi River Basin, Jaunpur, India
,
Environmental Sustainability
,
7
,
1
10
.
Yadav
A. K.
,
Verma
L.
,
Kulsoom
M.
,
Anita
,
Kumar
M.
,
Raw
K. P.
&
Kumar
N.
(
2024b
)
Engineered biochar fabricated from waste biomass of radish leaves for the fluoride removal from aqueous medium
,
International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology
,
21
(
5
),
4899
4912
.
Zhao
C. S.
,
Yang
Y.
,
Yang
S. T.
,
Xiang
H.
,
Ge
Y. R.
,
Zhang
Z. S.
&
Yu
Q.
(
2020
)
Effects of spatial variation in water quality and hydrological factors on environmental flows
,
Science of the Total Environment
,
728
,
138695
.
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Licence (CC BY-NC 4.0), which permits copying, adaptation and redistribution for non-commercial purposes, provided the original work is properly cited (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/).

Supplementary data