ABSTRACT
In the ongoing discourse surrounding environmental health, heightened attention has been directed toward contamination of aquatic ecosystems with antibiotics, particularly tetracycline. Graphene oxide (GO) has emerged as a promising avenue for absorbing these antibiotics from water. This work explores the potential of ZnO and Al2O3 nanoparticles for tetracycline removal. Initially, Al(OH)3 and Zn(OH)2 were synthesized through hydrothermal processes and dried at 90 °C, followed by annealing at 400 °C to yield Al2O3 and ZnO nanoparticles, respectively. The prepared samples were characterized by X-ray diffraction (XRD), atomic force microscopy (AFM), and Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR). Results indicated that nanoparticles in their hydroxide forms, heated to 90 °C, displayed superior tetracycline removal efficiency compared to oxide forms heated to 400 °C. This preference may stem from heightened activity or the ionic potential (charge/radius) of aluminum hydroxide nanoparticles, irrespective of heating temperature (400 or 90 °C). The findings could pave the way for novel approaches to removing antibiotic contaminants from water, offering solutions to mitigate pharmaceutical pollution's adverse effects on aquatic ecosystems and public health.
HIGHLIGHTS
Nanoscale aluminum and zinc oxides by hydrothermal processes have been synthesized.
The formation of nanoparticles is shown to be accompanied by differential tetracycline adsorption.
Adsorption favors oxide surfaces, suggesting more complex mechanisms for antibiotic residue removal.
The findings underscore surface chemistry's importance in nanoparticle-based water filtration systems.
INTRODUCTION
Water, essential to all life forms, covers approximately 71% of the Earth's surface, yet only a mere 1% is suitable for human consumption (Hossain 2015; Juzsakova et al. 2023). Clean water, devoid of hazardous compounds, chemicals, and pathogens, is indispensable for sustaining life (Balaram et al. 2023; Silva 2023). However, providing safe drinking water remains a paramount challenge for societies today, exacerbated by increased anthropogenic activities leading to environmental contamination (Devlin & Brodie 2023). Among the pollutants threatening water quality, antibiotics pose a significant concern due to their widespread use and persistence (Briffa et al. 2020). Despite their relatively low concentrations in water, antibiotics such as tetracycline exhibit high stability and toxicity, impacting aquatic biota and human health (Kim et al. 2011). Chemotherapeutic drugs that inhibit or stop the growth of microorganisms are known as antibiotics (Chen & Huang 2011). Antibiotics come in a variety of forms and can be categorized according to their chemical makeup, mode of action, spectrum of activity, and mode of administration (Ahmad et al. 2021). Their mode of action is the most often used of these classifications, and the most prevalent classes are based on the following: monobactams, carbapenems, lincomycin, macrolides, polypeptides, polyenes, rifamycin, tetracyclines, chloramphenicol, quinolones (Cheng et al. 2020) In today's society, pharmaceuticals, including antibiotics like tetracycline, play a crucial role in healthcare and wellness, further contributing to their presence in water bodies (Swapna Priya & Radha 2014). Tetracyclines are broad-spectrum antibiotics extensively employed in both human and veterinary medicine (Gao et al. 2012). Several techniques exist for the elimination of tetracycline from water sources, among these approaches are ion exchange, bioremediation, photocatalytic degradation, graphene oxide, adsorption (Kumari et al. 2023). Traditional water and wastewater treatment methods often fail to completely remove prescription antibiotics (Juzsakova et al. 2023). To address this challenge, researchers have explored various materials, including chitosan particles, rectorite, palygorskite, smectite clay, and montmorillonite, for adsorption and elimination of tetracycline antibiotics (Briffa et al. 2020). However, there remains a pressing need for cost-effective and efficient treatment methods to combat this contamination (Daghrir & Drogui 2013). ZnO, as a common semiconductor material, has gained increasing research attention because of its outstanding electrical and optical properties, low cost, high biological safety, environment benign and strong photocatalytic degradation ability of organic pollutants under UV light (Zafar et al. 2019). Aluminum oxide has a high surface area and porosity, allowing it to effectively adsorb antibiotic molecules from aqueous solutions (Chen & Huang 2010). Nanoparticles (NPs) such as aluminum oxide (Al2O3) and zinc oxide (ZnO) have emerged as highly promising adsorbents for the removal of water contaminants due to their exceptional ability to dissociate and capture chemical and biological pollutants present in aqueous environments (Liu et al. 2012).This recognition stems from their unique surface properties, large surface area-to-volume ratio, and tunable surface chemistry, which facilitate strong interactions with a wide range of contaminants (Katz & Miquel 1994; Al-Abduljabbar & Farooq 2022). Alumina (Al₂O₃) and zinc oxide (ZnO) are widely studied materials in the field of adsorption and catalysis due to their unique structural, chemical, and surface properties. Their high surface area, stability, and catalytic potential make them suitable candidates for removing contaminants, including pharmaceutical residues, from aqueous environments. Recent studies have shown the efficacy of alumina in adsorbing a range of pharmaceuticals, including antibiotics like tetracycline, due to its high surface area and acidic properties (Chen & Huang 2010; Ahmadi et al. 2022). This study explores the adsorption of tetracycline onto alumina, examining factors like surface interaction and adsorption performance. Alumina's amphoteric nature allows it to interact with various drug molecules through different bonding mechanisms, enhancing its adsorption capacity. Studies have demonstrated that alumina-based adsorbents can achieve high removal efficiencies, with some showing high adsorption under optimal conditions (Chen & Huang 2010). This paper highlights modifications to alumina that improve its adsorption of ciprofloxacin and other pharmaceuticals.
Similarly, zinc oxide (ZnO) is recognized for its photocatalytic properties, especially in degrading pharmaceutical contaminants through advanced oxidation processes (Ameta & Ameta 2018) discusses the photocatalytic degradation of various pharmaceutical contaminants using ZnO under UV light. ZnO has been used to degrade antibiotics, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), and other organic pollutants. Under UV or visible light irradiation, ZnO generates reactive oxygen species (ROS), which effectively degrade pharmaceutical compounds into less harmful byproducts (Tanveer et al. 2019). This study focuses on the degradation efficiency of ZnO for ibuprofen under UV light, emphasizing ROS generation and drug degradation pathway. In summary, both alumina and zinc oxide have shown promise in adsorbing and degrading pharmaceuticals, with studies highlighting their effectiveness, reaction mechanisms, and potential limitations. (AlMohamadi et al. 2024) This research compares doping modifications in alumina and ZnO, revealing significant performance improvements in the adsorption and photocatalysis of antibiotics. In summary, both alumina and zinc oxide have shown promise in adsorbing and degrading pharmaceuticals, with studies highlighting their effectiveness, reaction mechanisms, and potential limitations (Zhang et al. 2016).
Among the diverse array of water treatment methodologies available, adsorption has gained prominence as an effective and versatile approach for addressing the challenges posed by antibiotic wastewater contamination (Balali-Mood et al. 2021). Its appeal lies in its simplicity of operation, high removal efficiency, and cost-effectiveness, making it particularly suitable for large-scale applications in both industrial and municipal settings (Liang et al. 2016). However, the successful implementation of adsorption-based water treatment strategies critically hinges on the careful selection of appropriate adsorbents. Ideal adsorbents must fulfill several criteria, including abundance, affordability, ease of synthesis, and environmental compatibility, to ensure their practical viability and sustainability in real-world applications (Huang et al. 2018; LaPlante et al. 2022). Therefore, the quest for novel adsorbent materials with superior performance characteristics remains a focal point in the ongoing research aimed at advancing water treatment technologies. In this work, we used hydrothermal techniques to synthesize Al2O3 and ZnO NPs. Optimal conditions for tetracycline removal were identified through meticulous measurements of adsorption efficiency from liquid phases. We aim to contribute to the development of economical and efficient treatment methods for removing antibiotic contaminants from water, safeguarding both environmental health and human well-being (Alanazi et al. 2024).
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
Materials
Aluminum chloride hexahydrate (AlCl3·6H2O), 98.0%, and urea (NH2CONH2), 98.7% were obtained from Sigma-Aldric. Cetyltrimethyl ammonium bromide, 99.0%, and ethanol (C2H5OH) (97%) were obtained from (BDH). Also, zinc acetate Zn(CH3COO)2, 98.0%, was purchased from Sigma–Aldrich, Taufkirchen. Tetracycline was purchased from Samarra Pharmaceutical Company; sodium hydroxide (NaOH), 99.0%, and potassium permanganate (KMnO4), 99.7% were obtained from Sigma–Aldrich.
Creation of NPs using aluminum oxide (Al2O3 NPs)
Preparation about zinc oxide NPs
Absorption of tetracycline contaminants
Kinetic adsorption and equilibrium isotherms
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
Characteristics optics of the nanoparticle
Transmittances for the following nanoparticles: (a) aluminum oxide and (b) zinc oxide, blue color at 90 °C, red color at 400 °C.
Transmittances for the following nanoparticles: (a) aluminum oxide and (b) zinc oxide, blue color at 90 °C, red color at 400 °C.
The FTIR spectra
FTIR analysis of Al2O3 (a) as prepared and (b) heated at 400 °C. FTIR analysis of ZnO (c) as prepared and (d) heated at 400 °C.
FTIR analysis of Al2O3 (a) as prepared and (b) heated at 400 °C. FTIR analysis of ZnO (c) as prepared and (d) heated at 400 °C.
X-ray diffraction analysis
The X-ray diffraction patterns for Al(OH)3 and Al2O3 NPs
XRD for (a) Al(OH)3, (b) Al2O3, (c) Zn(OH)2, and (d) ZnO nanoparticles.
The results of the XRD for aluminum oxide and zinc oxide heated at 90 and 400 °C
. | Heated at . | 2θ (°) . | hkl . | FWHM (°) . | d (Å) . | D (Å) . | Lattice constant . | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
a (Å) . | b (Å) . | c (Å) . | |||||||
Aluminum oxide | 90 °C for 60 min | 49.106 | 200 | 0.80500 | 1.85375 | 108.43 | 3.707 | 12.016 | 2.90 |
38.413 | 031 | 0.58890 | 2.34148 | 142.77 | – | – | – | ||
28.263 | 120 | 0.66760 | 3.15495 | 122.64 | – | – | – | ||
400°C for 120 min | 66.89 | 440 | 1.54320 | 1.39750 | 59.55 | 7.901 | 7.901 | 7.901 | |
45.90 | 400 | 1.44790 | 1.97537 | 54.83 | – | – | – | ||
37.03 | 311 | 4.45720 | 2.42535 | 18.78 | – | – | – | ||
Zinc oxide | 90°C for 60 min | 36.44 | 101 | 0.63810 | 2.46337 | 130.99 | 3.3046 | – | 5.191 |
33.05 | 100 | 0.66670 | 2.70768 | 124.22 | – | – | – | ||
63.17 | 103 | 0.40710 | 1.47056 | 228.95 | – | – | – | ||
400°C for 120 min | 36.33 | 101 | 0.61880 | 2.47060 | 135.04 | 3.2428 | – | 5.206 | |
31.83 | 100 | 0.54370 | 2.80873 | 151.85 | – | – | |||
34.48 | 002 | 0.55420 | 2.59874 | 150.00 | – | – |
. | Heated at . | 2θ (°) . | hkl . | FWHM (°) . | d (Å) . | D (Å) . | Lattice constant . | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
a (Å) . | b (Å) . | c (Å) . | |||||||
Aluminum oxide | 90 °C for 60 min | 49.106 | 200 | 0.80500 | 1.85375 | 108.43 | 3.707 | 12.016 | 2.90 |
38.413 | 031 | 0.58890 | 2.34148 | 142.77 | – | – | – | ||
28.263 | 120 | 0.66760 | 3.15495 | 122.64 | – | – | – | ||
400°C for 120 min | 66.89 | 440 | 1.54320 | 1.39750 | 59.55 | 7.901 | 7.901 | 7.901 | |
45.90 | 400 | 1.44790 | 1.97537 | 54.83 | – | – | – | ||
37.03 | 311 | 4.45720 | 2.42535 | 18.78 | – | – | – | ||
Zinc oxide | 90°C for 60 min | 36.44 | 101 | 0.63810 | 2.46337 | 130.99 | 3.3046 | – | 5.191 |
33.05 | 100 | 0.66670 | 2.70768 | 124.22 | – | – | – | ||
63.17 | 103 | 0.40710 | 1.47056 | 228.95 | – | – | – | ||
400°C for 120 min | 36.33 | 101 | 0.61880 | 2.47060 | 135.04 | 3.2428 | – | 5.206 | |
31.83 | 100 | 0.54370 | 2.80873 | 151.85 | – | – | |||
34.48 | 002 | 0.55420 | 2.59874 | 150.00 | – | – |
The XRD patterns for Zn(OH)2 and ZnO NPs
The XRD pattern shows special peaks of Zn(OH)2 at (2θ = 33.227°, 34.925°, 36.444°, 47.612°, 56.692°, and 62.323°) that identify the diffraction planes (100), (002), (101), (102), (110), and (103), respectively (Figure 3(c)). These peaks are compatible with those reported in JCPDS Card No. 79-2205 and are indexed as the hexagonal wurtzite phase of Zn(OH)2 NPs with lattice constants a = b = 3.3046 Å and c = 5.0266 Å (Miller & Rocheleau 1997). Moreover, the X-ray of Zn(OH)2 is quite comparable to ZnO (JCPDS Card No. 01-089-0510) (Bindu & Thomas 2014; Kashinath et al. 2015).
Atomic force microscope surface morphology
Aluminum oxide (Al2O3) NPs
Variation of grain size for Al2O3 and ZnO heated at 90 and 400 °C
Sample . | Average grain size (nm) . | Ionic potential (charge/radius) . | |
---|---|---|---|
As prepared (90 °C) . | Annealing (400 °C) . | ||
Al2O3 | 38.65 | 53.82 | 0.044 |
ZnO | 28.29 | 35.44 | 0.022 |
Sample . | Average grain size (nm) . | Ionic potential (charge/radius) . | |
---|---|---|---|
As prepared (90 °C) . | Annealing (400 °C) . | ||
Al2O3 | 38.65 | 53.82 | 0.044 |
ZnO | 28.29 | 35.44 | 0.022 |
Atomic force microscopy pictures in three dimension and granularity collection division charts for Al2O3: (a) at 90 °C, (b) at 400 °C, and ZnO (c) at 90 °C, (d) at 400 °C.
Atomic force microscopy pictures in three dimension and granularity collection division charts for Al2O3: (a) at 90 °C, (b) at 400 °C, and ZnO (c) at 90 °C, (d) at 400 °C.
Zinc oxide (ZnO) NPs
SEM image for (a) Al2O3 and (b) ZnO annealing at 400 °C for 120 min.
This may have to do with the fact that most hydroxides Zn(OH)2 are converted to oxides ZnO when heated to 400 °C, as Table 2 illustrates. That is, during the preparation technique (autoclave), the product can be transformed into zinc oxide NPs, and the grain size grows from 28.29 to 35.44 nm as the temperature rises, as shown in Table 2.
Surface scanning electron microscopy surface morphology
The metal oxide NPs (ZnO and Al2O3) produced by the hydrothermal process and heated at 400 °C for 2 h are shown in the scanning electron microscopy (SEM) surface morphological image at a magnification of 500 nm. They are shown in Figure 5. These results demonstrate that raising the annealing temperature caused a high porosity structure to form on the sample's surfaces. Several clumps and clusters of NPs were visible on the surface. The SEM image of the annealed Al2O3 NPs in Figure 5(a) displays cluster formation, whereas Figure 5(b) displays the morphology of the ZnO particles in the sample, which exhibits a very wide particle size distribution and various platelet and flaky particle morphologies.
CONTAMINANT REMOVAL PERFORMANCE
Optimum condition results: (a) best nanoparticles adsorbed to tetracycline (TC), (b) best weight of Al(OH)3, (c) best TC concentration, (d) best shake time, (e) best shake speed, (f) best KMnO4 concentration.
Optimum condition results: (a) best nanoparticles adsorbed to tetracycline (TC), (b) best weight of Al(OH)3, (c) best TC concentration, (d) best shake time, (e) best shake speed, (f) best KMnO4 concentration.
A preliminary investigation was conducted to ascertain the optimal circumstances for tetracycline adsorption. Several factors were changed and only one factor remained constant each time when estimating the optimum conditions for removing tetracycline. These factors are: Al(OH)3 weight, tetracycline concentration, change in shaking time, and change in shaking speed.
Effect of weight
The impact of varying sample weights of Al(OH)3 on tetracycline removal was investigated in this study. Initially, five containers were labeled as B (blank) and T (test), and different weights of Al(OH)3 (0.0100, 0.0150, 0.0200, 0.0250, and 0.0300 g) were added to both T and B containers. Subsequently, a 1 ml aliquot of tetracycline solution from a mother solution of 560 ppm (0.0011 M) was added to the T containers, followed by the addition of 25 ml of distilled water to all containers. The solutions were then shaken at 250 rpm for 15 min and subsequently separated by centrifugation. Next, 2 ml of a mixture solution (NaOH and KMnO4) from the mother solution (NaOH 0.07M, and KMnO4 0.0336M) was added to all containers, and the mixture was agitated at room temperature, resulting in a final volume of 28 ml. The maximum absorbance was observed at λmax = 610 nm. The absorbance value exhibited a gradual increase with increasing weight of Al(OH)3 up to 0.02 g, followed by a slight decline. Consequently, this weight was determined as the optimal weight, as depicted in Figure 6(b).
Effect of tetracycline concentration
All procedures outlined in the previous section (section A) were replicated, with the exception that the weight of Al(OH)3 remained at 0.02 g, while varying tetracycline concentrations were tested (4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, and 28 ppm). The percentage of removal (%R) showed an increase with rising TC concentration up to 20 ppm, followed by a decrease as TC concentration further increased. Thus, a TC concentration of 20 ppm was determined to be the most effective, as illustrated in Figure 6(c) and Table 3.
The percentage removal (%R) and adsorption capacity (qt) of tetracycline pollution on nanoparticles (heated at 90 and 400 °C)
Metal oxide type . | Percentage removal (%R) . | Adsorption capacity (qt) . | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
As prepared . | Annealing . | As prepared . | Annealing . | |
Al2O3 | 56.95 | 47.21 | 1,628.42 | 129.88 |
ZnO | 51.50 | 45.57 | 1,020.70 | 1,130.98 |
Metal oxide type . | Percentage removal (%R) . | Adsorption capacity (qt) . | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
As prepared . | Annealing . | As prepared . | Annealing . | |
Al2O3 | 56.95 | 47.21 | 1,628.42 | 129.88 |
ZnO | 51.50 | 45.57 | 1,020.70 | 1,130.98 |
Effect of the shake time
The procedures outlined in the previous section were replicated, maintaining the weight of Al(OH)3 at 0.02 g, and using a fixed tetracycline concentration of 20 ppm. The shaking durations were varied (5, 10, 15, 20, 25, and 30 min) at a speed of 250 rpm. The percentage of removal (%R) increased as the shaking time increased, reaching a maximum at 15 min, after which it declined with further increases in shaking time. Hence, a shaking time of 15 min was deemed optimal, as depicted in Figure 6(d).
Effect of shake speed
The experiments conducted in the previous section were replicated, with the weight of Al(OH)3 set at 0.02 g, the TC at 20 ppm, and a shaking time of 15 min. Different shaking speeds were applied (50, 100, 150, 200, 250 rpm) at 250 rpm. The percentage of removal (%R) increased with the shake speeds, reaching its peak at 250 rpm. Thus, 250 rpm was determined to be the optimal shake speed, as illustrated in Figure 6(e).
Effect of potassium permanganate concentration
The experiments conducted in the previous section were replicated, with the weight of Al(OH)3 set at 0.02 g, the TC at 20 ppm, the shake time at 15 min, and the shake speeds at 250 rpm. Different concentrations of KMnO4 were tested (1.25, 2.50, 3.75, 5.0, 6.25, 7.50, and 8.75 ppm). The percentage of removal (%R) increased with the concentration until it peaked at 6.25 ppm. Therefore, this concentration was determined to be the most effective, as depicted in Figure 6(f).
KINETICS AND ISOTHERM MODELS
Comparison of the kinetic model equations on the sorption of TC from solution onto Al(OH)3
Pseudo-first order . | Pseudo-second order . | Intra-particle diffusion . | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
K1 (min−1) . | qe cal (mg/g) . | R2 . | K2 (g/mg min) . | qe cal (mg/g) . | R2 . | Kd (mg/g min1/2) . | I . | R2 . |
0.049 | 1.982 | 0.9917 | 1.010 | 3.247 | 0.9988 | 0.0302 | 0.891 | 0.9893 |
Pseudo-first order . | Pseudo-second order . | Intra-particle diffusion . | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
K1 (min−1) . | qe cal (mg/g) . | R2 . | K2 (g/mg min) . | qe cal (mg/g) . | R2 . | Kd (mg/g min1/2) . | I . | R2 . |
0.049 | 1.982 | 0.9917 | 1.010 | 3.247 | 0.9988 | 0.0302 | 0.891 | 0.9893 |
(a) Pseudo-first-order plot, (b) pseudo-second-order plot, (c) intra-particle diffusion plot for TC adsorption onto Al(OH)3.
(a) Pseudo-first-order plot, (b) pseudo-second-order plot, (c) intra-particle diffusion plot for TC adsorption onto Al(OH)3.
The pseudo-first-order model in the TC adsorption are equal to 0.9917, compare with the values of the pseudo-second-order result is 0.9988. That is mean the pseudo-second-order model exhibited the best fit with the experimental data on TC adsorption compare with the pseudo-first-order models. The third kinetic model was used to identify the diffusion mechanism. The value of I is an indication of the occurrence of the boundary layer effect during absorption of TC onto Al(OH)3. The larger I value means the greater the contribution surface absorption in the rate-controlling step.
Correlation coefficients and constant parameters calculated for various adsorption models
Langmuir . | Freundlich . | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
qmax (min−1) . | KL (L/mg) . | R2 . | ![]() | KF (mg/g) . | N . | R2 . | ![]() |
4.058 | 0.472 | 0.9709 | 1.858 | 1.316 | 1.337 | 0.9956 | −3.312 |
Langmuir . | Freundlich . | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
qmax (min−1) . | KL (L/mg) . | R2 . | ![]() | KF (mg/g) . | N . | R2 . | ![]() |
4.058 | 0.472 | 0.9709 | 1.858 | 1.316 | 1.337 | 0.9956 | −3.312 |
(a) Langmuir isotherm models for TC adsorption on Al(OH)3 and (b) Freundlich isotherm models for TC adsorption onto Al(OH)3.
(a) Langmuir isotherm models for TC adsorption on Al(OH)3 and (b) Freundlich isotherm models for TC adsorption onto Al(OH)3.
CONCLUSION
In this work, the synthesis of NPs via hydrothermal autoclaving presents a versatile route for tailored nanomaterial production. Al(OH)3 and Zn(OH)2 NPs were synthesized through meticulous heating protocols, yielding Al2O3 and ZnO NPs following annealing at 400 °C. Advanced characterization techniques including AFM, SEM, FTIR, UV-visible spectroscopy, and XRD unveiled distinct morphologies, with Al(OH)3 NPs exhibiting an average grain size of 38.65 nm and Zn(OH)2 NPs displaying a platelet-like morphology with an average grain size of 28.29 nm. Notably, hydroxide NPs demonstrated superior tetracycline removal efficiency compared to their oxide counterparts, attributed to enhanced ion binding facilitated by hydrogen bond formation on hydroxide surfaces. These findings highlight the pivotal role of precursor selection and synthesis conditions in tailoring nanoparticle properties, with implications for applications ranging from water treatment to environmental remediation.
DECLARATION OF GENERATIVE AI IN SCIENTIFIC WRITING
The authors declare that they have not used any AI tools for the scientific writing of this paper.
DATA AVAILABILITY STATEMENT
All relevant data are included in the paper or its Supplementary Information.
CONFLICT OF INTEREST
The authors declare there is no conflict.