ABSTRACT
Heavy metal ions are highly toxic to health, lung, kidney and nervous systems. A special featured polypyrrole with environmental stability and reusability was engaged for removal of metal ions from aqueous solution. In the present study, a new nanocomposite of polypyrrole (PPy/Ag2O) in the presence of hydroxypropylcellulose (HPC) as the surfactant was synthesized via in situ chemical oxidative polymerization method in aqueous medium. The synthesized nanocomposites were characterized by scanning electron microscopy (SEM), Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy and X-ray diffraction (XRD). Results indicated that the Ag2O and hydroxypropylcellulose (HPC) influenced the properties of the synthesized nanocomposites. The aim of this research was to investigate the sorption characteristics of PPy/Ag2O nanocomposites for the removal of heavy metal ions including Pb(II) and Co(II) from aqueous solution. The factors that affected the adsorption equilibrium as well as the removal efficiency of the nanoadsorbents, i.e., contact time, metal ion concentration, pH and adsorption conditions, were investigated in detail. The equilibrium data were fitted to Langmuir, Temkin and Freundlich isotherm models. From the kinetic results, it was concluded that the pseudo-second-order kinetic model was the best at describing the adsorption process for Pb(II) and Co(II) on PPy-HPC/Ag2O.
HIGHLIGHTS
A new nanocomposite containing Ag2O was synthesized for the removal of heavy metal ions.
The synthesized nanocomposite was characterized by scanning electron microscopy, Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy and XRD.
Sorption mechanism, isotherm, kinetics and thermodynamic studies were carried out.
The factors that affected the adsorption equilibrium and the removal efficiency of the nanoadsorbents, i.e., contact time, metal ion concentration, pH and adsorption conditions, were investigated in detail.
Desorption and regeneration studies were also performed.
INTRODUCTION
The pollution of heavy metals from industrial wastewater has become a global issue. Heavy metals are metallic chemical elements that have a high density and are toxic at low concentrations. With the development of industries such as metal finishing, ceramics, pulp, lead smelters, electroplating, mining, batteries, fertilizers and paper industries, heavy metal ions are discharged into rivers, lakes and ocean environments (Guo et al. 2022; Ghasemi et al. 2023). Heavy metal exposure causes serious health effects, such as cancer, organ damage, nervous system damage, lung damage and damage to the brain, and eventually leads to death. Therefore, it is necessary to remove the heavy metal ions before they are released into the environment (Ghamari et al. 2022).
Many techniques, such as coagulation–flocculation (Montaño-Medina et al. 2023), ion exchange (Tavakoli et al. 2017), physical and chemical precipitation (Türk et al. 2022), membrane filtration (Li et al. 2023), electrochemical treatment (Fang et al. 2023), reverse osmosis (Khan et al. 2023) and adsorption processes (Jing et al. 2023), are extensively used methods for removing heavy metal ions from an aqueous medium. Among the technologies, adsorption technology is the best technology. Adsorption is a low-cost industrial separation technique, easy to operate and particularly effective. In addition, it does not result in the formation of harmful substances (Zavala & Bouchez 2022; Arenas et al. 2023; Pan et al. 2023).
Finding new materials for adsorbents with high adsorption performance and selectivity remains challenging. Different types of adsorbents have been proposed including active carbon (Joshi et al. 2022), ferromagnetic materials (Song et al. 2022), polymer (Karimi et al. 2021) and biosorbents (Dey et al. 2022). Polymers, which are characterized by reactive functional groups containing O, N, S and P atoms, have gained great attention as an effective adsorbent for heavy metals due to the high ability and affinity of both nitrogen and sulfur atoms to bind with the metal ion (Khalili et al. 2021; Stejskal et al. 2023). Conducting polymers, such as polyaniline, polypyrrole (PPy) and polythiophene with interesting doping capabilities, have been identified as candidates for adsorbents (Kharazi et al. 2018; Morsi et al. 2018; Jurča et al. 2022). As one of the novel conducting polymers, polypyrrole (PPy) is a conjugated polymer with alternating single and double bonds (Barkade et al. 2023). In order to obtain an adsorbent with high metal ion sorption efficiency, this polymer can be used combined with various materials such as multiwalled carbon nanotubes (MWCNTs) (Yan et al. 2022) and metal oxides (Sarojini et al. 2021; Amara et al. 2023). These composites have the properties of metals and polymers and also exhibit many new characteristics that single-phase materials do not have (Hosseini et al. 2017). There are various methods for the synthesis of conductive polymers, among which the in situ polymerization method is of particular interest. The advantages of this method include the ability to produce polymer products with required properties and characteristics by adjusting process conditions, reducing waste and production costs, reducing production time and reducing the need for post-processing steps (Bayramoglu et al. 2024; Bayramoglu & Yakup Arica 2024).
Hence, in this study, polypyrrole containing nanometre-sized Ag2O was synthesized via the in situ chemical oxidative polymerization method in the presence of hydroxypropyl cellulose (HPC) as a surfactant. The structure and morphology were analyzed by Fourier transform infrared (FTIR), X-ray diffraction and scanning electron microscopy (SEM). Using these nanocomposites as absorbents, the removal of heavy metal ions, such as Pb(II) and Co(II), from water was investigated. The influences of various parameters, such as contact time, initial concentration of heavy metal ions and pH on the sorption capacity, were investigated. Also, the adsorption kinetics, equilibrium and thermodynamics were discussed.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Instrumentation
A magnetic mixer model MK20 (Germany), pH meter model HANNA211, centrifuge model Z-36HK, FTIR spectrometer Thermo Nicolet model Nexuf 670, XRD model Equinox 3000, SEM model KYKY-EM3200, flame atomic absorption spectrophotometer model Thermo electron, oven Binder model FD 23 and digital scale model FR 200 were employed.
Materials
All reagents were used as received without further purification. Materials used in this work were monomer of pyrrole (d = 0.97 g/cm3), nanometre-sized silver oxide (Ag2O) from Aldrich, ferric chloride (FeCl3) and HPC obtained from Merck (Schuchardt, Germany). Pyrrole monomer was purified by simple distillation before use. Distilled water was employed throughout this work.
Preparation of polypyrrole/Ag2O in the presence of HPC as the surfactant
The polypyrrole was synthesized chemically using FeCl3 as an oxidant in aqueous media. For the synthesis, 5 g of FeCl3 was added in 50 mL of distilled water. Then 0.2 g of HPC and 1.0 g of Ag2O were dissolved in 50 mL of distilled water, a uniform solution was achieved using a magnetic mixer for 20 min and added to the oxidant solution. Finally, 1 mL of pyrrole monomer was added to a stirred aqueous solution, which was maintained under constant stirring. The reaction was carried out for 5 h at room temperature. The product was collected by filtration. In order to separate the oligomers and impurities, the product was washed several times with deionized water. It was then dried at about 60 °C in an oven for 24 h. As a reference sample, a pure PPy was synthesized using the same method used previously, without Ag2O and HPC (i.e., 100 mL of distilled water containing 5 g of FeCl3 and 1 mL of pyrrole monomer).
Batch adsorption experiment
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
Characterization of nanocomposites
FTIR spectra of (a) pure PPy, (b) PPy-HPC, (c) PPy/Ag2O and (d) PPy-HPC/Ag2O nanocomposites.
FTIR spectra of (a) pure PPy, (b) PPy-HPC, (c) PPy/Ag2O and (d) PPy-HPC/Ag2O nanocomposites.
XRD patterns of (a) pure PPy, (b) Ag2O and (c) PPy/Ag2O nanocomposites.
The morphological characterization of products was analyzed using a scanning electron microscope.
SEM images of (a) pure PPy, (b) PPy-HPC, (c) PPy–Ag2O and (d) PPy-HPC/Ag2O nanocomposites.
SEM images of (a) pure PPy, (b) PPy-HPC, (c) PPy–Ag2O and (d) PPy-HPC/Ag2O nanocomposites.
Effect of pH
According to the SEM micrographs of the composites, PPy-HPC/Ag2O had the most uniform particular shape and characteristics among the synthesized composites. Thus, the adsorption experiments were carried out using this adsorbent. The pH values of the aqueous solution are an important controlling parameter in the adsorption process, which affects the surface charge of the adsorbent and the ionization of the functional groups onto the adsorbent surfaces (Karthikeyan et al. 2021).
Effect of pH on the removal efficiency with PPy-HPC/Ag2O (experimental conditions: initial concentrations of heavy metal ions for Pb(II) and Co(II), contact time and the amount of adsorbent were 50 mg/L, 45 min and 0.3 g, respectively).
Effect of pH on the removal efficiency with PPy-HPC/Ag2O (experimental conditions: initial concentrations of heavy metal ions for Pb(II) and Co(II), contact time and the amount of adsorbent were 50 mg/L, 45 min and 0.3 g, respectively).
The increase in Pb(II) and Co(II) removal with the increase in pH can be explained based on H+ ion concentration. At lower pH values, the concentration of H+ ions is higher. The adsorption sites become protonated and competition also exists between the metal ions and H+ ions, which causes the decrease of Pb(II) and removal of Co(II) ions. At higher pH values, the concentration of H+ ions is relatively less. Thus, the affinity for the Pb(II) and Co(II) ions to chelate with the PPy-HPC/Ag2O has been increased without any competition for the adsorption sites, which causes an increase in removal percentage.
Effect of contact time
Effect of contact time on the removal efficiency with PPy-HPC/Ag2O (experimental conditions: initial concentrations of heavy metal ions for Pb(II) and Co(II) and the amount of adsorbent were 50 mg/L and 0.3 g, respectively).
Effect of contact time on the removal efficiency with PPy-HPC/Ag2O (experimental conditions: initial concentrations of heavy metal ions for Pb(II) and Co(II) and the amount of adsorbent were 50 mg/L and 0.3 g, respectively).
Adsorption isotherms
Langmuir, Freundlich and Temkin isotherm model constants of Pb(II) and Co(II) adsorption onto the PPy-HPC/Ag2O nanocomposites
Adsorption isotherm . | Constants . | Pb(ІІ) . | Co(ІІ) . |
---|---|---|---|
Langmuir | qm (mg/g) | 14.947 | 15.504 |
KL (L/mg) | 0.092 | 0.053 | |
R2 | 0.9719 | 0.9765 | |
Freundlich | KF (L/g) | 2.351 | 1.557 |
n | 2.343 | 1.98 | |
R2 | 0.9247 | 0.9596 | |
Temkin | at | 0.87 | 0 |
bt | 2.8038 | 2.7043 | |
R2 | 0.9627 | 0.9529 |
Adsorption isotherm . | Constants . | Pb(ІІ) . | Co(ІІ) . |
---|---|---|---|
Langmuir | qm (mg/g) | 14.947 | 15.504 |
KL (L/mg) | 0.092 | 0.053 | |
R2 | 0.9719 | 0.9765 | |
Freundlich | KF (L/g) | 2.351 | 1.557 |
n | 2.343 | 1.98 | |
R2 | 0.9247 | 0.9596 | |
Temkin | at | 0.87 | 0 |
bt | 2.8038 | 2.7043 | |
R2 | 0.9627 | 0.9529 |
Langmuir (a), Freundlich (b) and Temkin (c) adsorption isotherms' linear curve fitting of Pb(II) on PPy-HPC/Ag2O (experimental conditions: initial concentrations of heavy metal ion for Pb(II) and the amount of adsorbent were 25, 50, 75, 100, 150, 200 mg/L and 0.3 g, respectively).
Langmuir (a), Freundlich (b) and Temkin (c) adsorption isotherms' linear curve fitting of Pb(II) on PPy-HPC/Ag2O (experimental conditions: initial concentrations of heavy metal ion for Pb(II) and the amount of adsorbent were 25, 50, 75, 100, 150, 200 mg/L and 0.3 g, respectively).
Langmuir (a), Freundlich (b) and Temkin (c) adsorption isotherms' linear curve fitting of Co(II) on PPy-HPC/Ag2O (experimental conditions: initial concentrations of heavy metal ion for Co(II) and the amount of adsorbent were 25, 50, 75, 100, 150, 200 mg/L and 0.3 g, respectively).
Langmuir (a), Freundlich (b) and Temkin (c) adsorption isotherms' linear curve fitting of Co(II) on PPy-HPC/Ag2O (experimental conditions: initial concentrations of heavy metal ion for Co(II) and the amount of adsorbent were 25, 50, 75, 100, 150, 200 mg/L and 0.3 g, respectively).
Adsorption kinetics


Kinetic parameters of Pb(II) and Co(II) adsorption onto the PPy-HPC/Ag2O nanocomposites
Kinetic models . | Parameters . | Pb(ІІ) . | Co(ІІ) . |
---|---|---|---|
Pseudo-first-order | K1 (1/min) | 0.019 | 0.018 |
R2 | 0.4808 | 0.4249 | |
Pseudo-second-order | K2 (g/mg·min) | 0.026 | 0.044 |
qe (mg/g) | 4.926 | 4.537 | |
qe, experimental | 4.74 | 4.45 | |
R2 | 0.9957 | 0.9983 |
Kinetic models . | Parameters . | Pb(ІІ) . | Co(ІІ) . |
---|---|---|---|
Pseudo-first-order | K1 (1/min) | 0.019 | 0.018 |
R2 | 0.4808 | 0.4249 | |
Pseudo-second-order | K2 (g/mg·min) | 0.026 | 0.044 |
qe (mg/g) | 4.926 | 4.537 | |
qe, experimental | 4.74 | 4.45 | |
R2 | 0.9957 | 0.9983 |
Effect of adsorption time on the adsorption capacity with PPy-HPC/Ag2O.
Thermodynamic study
The obtained values for ΔG, ΔH and ΔS are listed in Table 3. The negative values of ΔG at different temperatures indicate that the removal of Pb(II) and Co(II) ions by PPy-HPC/Ag2O is a spontaneous process and the spontaneity increases with temperature. The positive values of ΔH for all studied experiments confirmed the endothermic nature of the sorption process and pointed out that the adsorption is more active at higher temperatures. In addition, the positive values of ΔS reveal the possibility of increased randomness at the solid and liquid interface during the Pb(II) and Co(II) ion sorption on PPy-HPC/Ag2O. The results acquired from thermodynamics, showing that heat promotes the adsorption of Pb(II) and Co(II) ions on the PPy-HPC/Ag2O nanocomposite, are consistent with those obtained in the adsorption isotherm and adsorption kinetics investigations.
Thermodynamic parameters of Pb(II) and Co(II) adsorption onto the PPy-HPC/Ag2O nanocomposites
Thermodynamic parameters . | Pb(ІІ) . | Co(ІІ) . | |
---|---|---|---|
ΔG (kJ/mol) | T = 298 (K) | −6.73 | −5.13 |
T = 308 (K) | −7.23 | −6.05 | |
T = 323 (K) | −8.26 | −6.706 | |
ΔH (kJ/mol) | 11.72 | 13.08 | |
ΔS (kJ/mol·K) | 0.0618 | 0.0615 |
Thermodynamic parameters . | Pb(ІІ) . | Co(ІІ) . | |
---|---|---|---|
ΔG (kJ/mol) | T = 298 (K) | −6.73 | −5.13 |
T = 308 (K) | −7.23 | −6.05 | |
T = 323 (K) | −8.26 | −6.706 | |
ΔH (kJ/mol) | 11.72 | 13.08 | |
ΔS (kJ/mol·K) | 0.0618 | 0.0615 |
Effect of the initial concentration of metal ions on the adsorption
The concentrations of 30, 60, 100 and 150 (mg/L) of Pb(II) and Co(II) ions from the aqueous solution using composites at the optimum experimental conditions including pH and contact time were investigated. The amount of adsorbent was adjusted to 0.3 g in a 30 mL solution. Tables 4 and 5 show the effect of the initial concentration of Pb(II) and Co(II) on the removal percentage of nanocomposites, respectively.
The effect of the initial concentration of Pb(ІІ) ion on the removal efficiency
Type of adsorbent . | Initial concentration: 30 (mg/L) . | Initial concentration: 60 (mg/L) . | Initial concentration: 100 (mg/L) . | Initial concentration: 150 (mg/L) . | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Final concentration (mg/L) . | Removal percentage (%) . | Final concentration (mg/L) . | Removal percentage (%) . | Final concentration (mg/L) . | Removal percentage (%) . | Final concentration (mg/L) . | Removal percentage (%) . | |
PPy | 6.03 | 79.9 | 8.47 | 85.88 | 25.09 | 74.91 | 48.71 | 67.52 |
PPy-HPC | 4.98 | 83.4 | 5.73 | 90.45 | 26.17 | 73.83 | 42.18 | 71.88 |
PPy/Ag2O | 3.92 | 86.93 | 4.35 | 92.75 | 23.19 | 76.81 | 44.11 | 70.6 |
PPy-HPC/Ag2O | 2.48 | 91.73 | 3.4 | 94.3 | 21 | 79 | 39.5 | 73.66 |
Type of adsorbent . | Initial concentration: 30 (mg/L) . | Initial concentration: 60 (mg/L) . | Initial concentration: 100 (mg/L) . | Initial concentration: 150 (mg/L) . | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Final concentration (mg/L) . | Removal percentage (%) . | Final concentration (mg/L) . | Removal percentage (%) . | Final concentration (mg/L) . | Removal percentage (%) . | Final concentration (mg/L) . | Removal percentage (%) . | |
PPy | 6.03 | 79.9 | 8.47 | 85.88 | 25.09 | 74.91 | 48.71 | 67.52 |
PPy-HPC | 4.98 | 83.4 | 5.73 | 90.45 | 26.17 | 73.83 | 42.18 | 71.88 |
PPy/Ag2O | 3.92 | 86.93 | 4.35 | 92.75 | 23.19 | 76.81 | 44.11 | 70.6 |
PPy-HPC/Ag2O | 2.48 | 91.73 | 3.4 | 94.3 | 21 | 79 | 39.5 | 73.66 |
The effect of the initial concentration of Co(ІІ) ion on the removal efficiency
Type of adsorbent . | Initial concentration: 30 (mg/L) . | Initial concentration: 60 (mg/L) . | Initial concentration: 100 (mg/L) . | Initial concentration: 150 (mg/L) . | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Final concentration (mg/L) . | Removal percentage (%) . | Final concentration (mg/L) . | Removal percentage (%) . | Final concentration (mg/L) . | Removal percentage (%) . | Final concentration (mg/L) . | Removal percentage (%) . | |
PPy | 8.22 | 72.6 | 10.38 | 82.7 | 26.39 | 73.61 | 52.26 | 65.16 |
PPy-HPC | 6.07 | 79.76 | 8.45 | 85.91 | 29.7 | 70.3 | 53.75 | 64.16 |
PPy/Ag2O | 4.91 | 83.63 | 7.19 | 88.01 | 27.14 | 72.86 | 49.07 | 67.28 |
PPy-HPC/Ag2O | 3.7 | 87.66 | 6.2 | 89.66 | 23.56 | 76.44 | 44.16 | 70.56 |
Type of adsorbent . | Initial concentration: 30 (mg/L) . | Initial concentration: 60 (mg/L) . | Initial concentration: 100 (mg/L) . | Initial concentration: 150 (mg/L) . | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Final concentration (mg/L) . | Removal percentage (%) . | Final concentration (mg/L) . | Removal percentage (%) . | Final concentration (mg/L) . | Removal percentage (%) . | Final concentration (mg/L) . | Removal percentage (%) . | |
PPy | 8.22 | 72.6 | 10.38 | 82.7 | 26.39 | 73.61 | 52.26 | 65.16 |
PPy-HPC | 6.07 | 79.76 | 8.45 | 85.91 | 29.7 | 70.3 | 53.75 | 64.16 |
PPy/Ag2O | 4.91 | 83.63 | 7.19 | 88.01 | 27.14 | 72.86 | 49.07 | 67.28 |
PPy-HPC/Ag2O | 3.7 | 87.66 | 6.2 | 89.66 | 23.56 | 76.44 | 44.16 | 70.56 |
As can be seen, the removal percentage of Pb(II) and Co(II) increases with the initial concentration of metal ions for all of the composites and the maximum value was obtained at about 60 mg/L. The increased number of metal ions in the solution increases the opportunity for the active group to bind with the metal ion, which increases the removal efficiency. Then by increasing the initial concentration of metal ions in the aqueous solution, the removal percentage was reduced. At high initial concentrations, the absorbent surfaces become saturated with the ions and the residual metal ion concentration in the solution is increased. It is noted that the removal efficiency of PPy-HPC for Pb(II) and Co(II) ions is more significant than that of pure PPy, indicating an efficient modification of PPy with HPC. By giving more attention to Tables 4 and 5, it is observed that silver oxide effectively influences the removal percentage. The particle size of the composite was decreased by adding Ag2O. As a result, the total surface of the adsorbent increased and the removal percentage also increased.
To better understand these results, Brunauer–Emmett–Teller (BET) measurements were performed on the surface of the composites. The nanocomposite of PPy-HPC/Ag2O showed a larger surface area of 23.47 m2/g than those of the pure PPy and composite of PPy/Ag2O, which were 6.13 and 13.08 m2/g, respectively. An increase in the surface area agrees with the reduction in the particle size as seen in the SEM image of PPy-HPC/Ag2O. So, it can be confirmed that increasing the PPy-HPC/Ag2O surface leads to an improvement in the percentage removal performance.
Adsorption mechanism
There are two different mechanisms in the adsorption of heavy metal ions on PPy-HPC/Ag2O: (i) physical adsorption on the surface of PPy-HPC/Ag2O and (ii) chemical adsorption through interactions of PPy molecules with Pb(II) and Co(II) ions. Polypyrrole composites have spherical and porous structures with a high specific surface area. Therefore, metal ions can diffuse through the adsorbent porosity and adsorb on the surface of the composites. Another probable adsorption mechanism occurring on the surface of PPy/Ag2O is the electrostatic interaction of the hydroxyl groups or chelation with N atoms situating in the PPy matrix and metal ions. It can be anticipated that the interactions between ions and the PPy matrix are a result of hybridization between a non-bonding pair of nitrogen atoms of polypyrrole and the empty orbital of metal ions such as Pb(ІІ) (Behera et al. 2022; Shen et al. 2022). Furthermore, the nitrogen species of PPy play crucial major roles in the reduction process of the polymer–metal interface.
Desorption and reusability
Comparison with other adsorbents and different methods
The maximum sorption ability has an important role in the removal of Pb(II) and Co(II). The adsorption capacity of various adsorbents, especially adsorbents containing Ag2O, was compared with previous studies. Data in Table 6 confirm that the conducting polymer PPy was a rich material for the removal of heavy metal ions. Also, Ag2O enables a platform for the incorporation of PPy by which the adsorption capacity of the nanocomposite is increased. The batch adsorption experiment has more remarkable properties than previously reported methods for the removal of Pb(II) and Co(II) ions (Table 7). The advantage of the batch adsorption experiment method is its versatility, which saves time for the adsorption of heavy metal ions with a high conversion percentage and requires less additional and auxiliary equipment.
Comparison of adsorption capacities of different adsorbents
Adsorbent . | Metal ions . | Adsorption capacity (mg/g) . | Reference . |
---|---|---|---|
TiO2/Ag2O nanoadsorbents | Co | 0.242 | Behera et al. (2022) |
Oil palm bio-waste/MWCNT reinforced polyvinyl alcohol (PVA) hydrogel composites | Pb | 30.031 | Mahmoud et al. (2018) |
Chitosan/PVA beads | Pb | 9.48 | Zulfiqar et al. (2020) |
Torrefied biomass | Pb | 30.0 | Predescu et al. (2019) |
Rose leaf with polypyrrole | Pb | 1.33 | Demey et al. (2019) |
TiO2/poly(acrylamide–styrene sodium sulfonate) | Co | 100.9 | Canoluk & Gursoy (2017) |
Kaolinite modified with tetrabutylammonium bromide | Co | 9 | Borai et al. (2015) |
PPy-HPC/Ag2O nanocomposite | Pb | 14.947 | This work |
Adsorbent . | Metal ions . | Adsorption capacity (mg/g) . | Reference . |
---|---|---|---|
TiO2/Ag2O nanoadsorbents | Co | 0.242 | Behera et al. (2022) |
Oil palm bio-waste/MWCNT reinforced polyvinyl alcohol (PVA) hydrogel composites | Pb | 30.031 | Mahmoud et al. (2018) |
Chitosan/PVA beads | Pb | 9.48 | Zulfiqar et al. (2020) |
Torrefied biomass | Pb | 30.0 | Predescu et al. (2019) |
Rose leaf with polypyrrole | Pb | 1.33 | Demey et al. (2019) |
TiO2/poly(acrylamide–styrene sodium sulfonate) | Co | 100.9 | Canoluk & Gursoy (2017) |
Kaolinite modified with tetrabutylammonium bromide | Co | 9 | Borai et al. (2015) |
PPy-HPC/Ag2O nanocomposite | Pb | 14.947 | This work |
Comparison of the proposed method with the previously published methods
Adsorbent . | Metal ions . | Adsorption capacity (mg/g) . | Reference . |
---|---|---|---|
Almond green hull | Co | 45.5 | Ahmadpour et al. (2009) |
Montmorillonite modified with tetrabutylammonium bromide | Co | 22.3 | Borai et al. (2015) |
MnO2-coated carbon nanotubes | Pb | 6.7 | Bhattacharyya & Gupta (2009) |
Multiwalled carbon nanotubes | Pb | 1 | Yang et al. (2011) |
Area shell biomass | Co | 11.53 | Dahiya et al. (2008) |
Lemon peel adsorbent | Co | 22 | Bhatnagar et al. (2010) |
Polypyrrole-modified magnetic-reduced graphene oxide composites | Pb | 93 | Liu et al. (2020) |
PPy-HPC/Ag2O nanocomposite | Co | 15.504 | This work |
Adsorbent . | Metal ions . | Adsorption capacity (mg/g) . | Reference . |
---|---|---|---|
Almond green hull | Co | 45.5 | Ahmadpour et al. (2009) |
Montmorillonite modified with tetrabutylammonium bromide | Co | 22.3 | Borai et al. (2015) |
MnO2-coated carbon nanotubes | Pb | 6.7 | Bhattacharyya & Gupta (2009) |
Multiwalled carbon nanotubes | Pb | 1 | Yang et al. (2011) |
Area shell biomass | Co | 11.53 | Dahiya et al. (2008) |
Lemon peel adsorbent | Co | 22 | Bhatnagar et al. (2010) |
Polypyrrole-modified magnetic-reduced graphene oxide composites | Pb | 93 | Liu et al. (2020) |
PPy-HPC/Ag2O nanocomposite | Co | 15.504 | This work |
CONCLUSIONS
In this study, polymeric nanocomposites (PPy/Ag2O) were synthesized in the presence of HPC as the surfactant to be used for the adsorption of Pb(II) and Co(II) ions from an aqueous medium. The synthesized composites were analyzed by FTIR spectroscopy, XRD and SEM. The results indicated that the Ag2O and HPC influenced the properties of the synthesized nanocomposites. The extra peaks in the XRD pattern of the nanocomposites indicate the presence of Ag2O nanoparticles in the polypyrrole matrix. Batch adsorption experiments were performed for heavy metal ion removal from the aqueous solution. The adsorption characteristics were investigated at different pH values, contact times and initial metal ion concentrations. The results can be summarized as follows:
(1) The pH of the solutions was found to be an important factor in the metal adsorption process. The results show that the removal of Pb(II) and Co(II) ions increased with the increase in pH and the maximum removal of Pb(II) and Cd(II) ions occurred at pH 6 and 5, respectively. This is supported by the fact that the surface of PPy-HPC/Ag2O becomes more negative as pH increases. Negative charges on PPy-HPC/Ag2O surfaces can cause more electrostatic attraction of Pb(II) and Co(II) ions.
(2) The optimum equilibrium time was achieved within 30 min of contact time for the adsorption of Pb(II) and Co(II) from the aqueous solution.
(3) The adsorption isotherms for Pb(II) and Co(II) on PPy-HPC/Ag2O were well fitted with the Langmuir model.
(4) The maximum theoretical adsorption capacity for Pb(II) and Co(II) was 14.947 and 15.504 mg/g, respectively.
(5) From the kinetic results, it was concluded that the pseudo-second-order kinetic model was the best at describing the adsorption process.
(6) The thermodynamic parameters indicated the endothermic and spontaneous nature of the present adsorption process with increased entropy on PPy-HPC/Ag2O.
Based on these results, the polypyrrole (PPy/Ag2O) in the presence of HPC nanocomposites was found to be appropriate for the removal of Pb(II) and Co(II) from aqueous solutions.
DATA AVAILABILITY STATEMENT
All relevant data are included in the paper or its Supplementary Information.
CONFLICT OF INTEREST
The authors declare there is no conflict.