The constant increase in the global population is proportional to the increase in basic human needs associated with environmental degradation. Sedimentation in water bodies poses socio-economic challenges as it lessens the storage capacities. The RUSLE model expresses the effect of sedimentation in the Lwanyo reservoir sub-catchment. Key factors influencing sedimentation include: maximum erosivity factor (R) is 421.39 (MJ mm ha−1 h−1 yr), the soil erodibility factor (K) is 0.071, the topographic factor (LS) due to catchment topography is 9.086, the vegetation cover and management factor (C) is 0.1045, and the conservation practice factor (P) is 0.14. The RUSLE model estimates soil sediment loss to be 3.977 tonnes/ha/year, as the average annual soil loss for the Lwanyo sub-catchment area is 39.6 km2. This value indicates that for every hectare, the average annual soil loss is 1.004 × 10−3 tonnes/year, with silt as the dominant soil sediment being eroded. If no intervention measures are implemented, the sediment load could reach 119.31 tonnes over 30 years, reducing the reservoir's storage capacity by 68.177 m3. Reducing human activity in the catchment and promoting afforestation to mitigate sedimentation can help increase soil stability and reduce erosion.

  • Catchment soil loss impacts the water reservoir as it reduces the storage capacity and lessens the life span of the reservoir.

  • The RUSLE model estimates the amount of soil loss from the catchment using five input variables from the catchment soil and its topographical nature.

  • The effect of catchment soil loss is influenced by human anthropogenic activities.

  • Reducing soil loss is based on catchment conservation measures.

Communities depend on water reservoirs to provide water that supports a range of services including the generation of electricity, water supply for domestic uses, to meet irrigation needs, for industrial uses and recreation (Snyder et al. 2004; Huang et al. 2018). Some of these reservoirs are subject to sedimentation (Wohl & Cenderelli 2000; Huang et al. 2018). Sedimentation occurs when soil is eroded from the land surface or stream banks and is transported by runoff and stream flows into water bodies where the reduction in flow velocity deposits the sediment in water bodies like reservoirs (Tundu et al. 2018). These hydrological processes are complex (Ezugwu 2013). The sediment yield from a catchment, its transportation and deposition are influenced by a range of factors including topography, rainfall, soil types, vegetation and land use.

Several approaches have been applied to estimate sedimentation in reservoirs. In India, the hydrographic surveys are conducted using echo-sounders, satellite-based global positioning systems and computerized methods to estimate sedimentation. This requires extensive fieldwork, costly equipment and skilled manpower (Goel et al. 2002). In contrast, Jain et al. (2002) used remotely sensed data to estimate sedimentation in the Bhakra Reservoir in the Himalayan Region. Heidarnejad et al. (2006) compared estimates of the sediment volumes that accumulated in the Karaj Reservoir using the hydrometry method (a physical approach) and the hydrograph method (an empirical approach). The sediment volume deposited over 30 years was estimated by the hydrometry method and the hydrograph method to be 416,667 and 406,515 m3, respectively. The Lwanyo Reservoir in Tanzania, a critical water source for the Ruanda Majenje Irrigation Scheme, was selected for this study due to its significant role in supporting 2,780 people and irrigating 720 ha of farmland. Unlike other reservoirs, Lwanyo faces acute sedimentation challenges, which have drastically reduced its storage capacity, threatening its ability to meet irrigation demands. Its location in a semi-arid region, coupled with its proximity to highly erodible catchment areas, accelerates sediment deposition, making it a compelling case for studying sedimentation dynamics and their impact on reservoir performance. Additionally, the use of empirical sediment modelling approaches, which require fewer resources while producing comparable results, was preferred for this study to effectively assess the reservoir's sedimentation issues (Jahun et al. 2015a). Lwanyo's socioeconomic importance and susceptibility to sedimentation, combined with limited studies on similar reservoirs in Tanzania, make it an ideal choice for research on sustainable water resource management (Mkhandi et al. 2003; Ngongondo et al. 2011).

Models can be classified based on their complexity and are composed of empirical, conceptual and process models (Ndiritu & Daniell 1999). Process models are designed to use field-measured values of parameters and are intended to closely represent the processes. Most of these models are distributed in order to represent the physical processes and rely on measured values of parameters (Ndiritu & Daniell 1999). Huang et al. (2018) applied physical-based models where the Buckingham π theorem, hydrodynamic similarity and sediment similarity were applied to estimate sediments in the Wushe Reservoir in Taiwan. However, inadequate data, the complexity of the problem and model imperfections limit the application of physical models in real-world problems (Katambara & Ndiritu 2009).

Conceptual models use simple equations to represent the processes, while empirical models do not represent the processes at all. Conceptual and empirical models are calibrated to obtain the model parameters (Ndiritu & Daniell 1999; Katambara & Ndiritu 2009). Generally, the calibration process involves dividing the observed datasets into two sets: one set for calibration and one set for verification (Ndiritu & Daniell 1999; Jothiprakash & Garg 2009; Katambara & Ndiritu 2010). An acceptable objective function is used to minimize the error. The evaluation of model performance attempts to measure the extent to which the model mimics the process (Moriasi et al. 2007; Swilla et al. 2024). Empirical models have been widely used to estimate sediment yield including the Universal Soil Loss Equation (USLE) (Wischmeier & Smith 1978). Improvements made based on 40 years of research have resulted in an improved version of the model, the Revised USLE (RUSLE), which is capable of incorporating distributed data from GIS, is less costly and has an improved accuracy (Jahun et al. 2015b). The RUSLE was adopted for this study.

The RUSLE model is a computerized tool for estimating the average annual soil loss and was developed by the Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) within the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) (Inoue et al. 2015). The fundamental equation in the RUSLE model is:
(1)
where A is the computed annual soil loss in tonnes/ha/year, R is the rainfall-runoff erosivity factor, K is a soil erodibility factor, L is the slope length, S is the slope steepness (both LS forms the topographic factor), C is the cover management factor and P is a supporting practices factor (Jahun et al. 2015b).

Several studies have developed site – or region-specific functions to estimate these factors, such as Fu et al. (2006) who developed an equivalent R factor (Re) for the Inland Pacific Northwest. Renard et al. (1997) proposed the erodibility factor, and Moore & Burch (1986) suggested the length of the slope (L) and the steepness of the slope (S). Ghosal & Das Bhattacharya (2020) reviewed the RUSLE model and reported on the variation of rainfall erosivity factor over different climatic zones, the variation of soil erodibility factor over different soil properties, the variation of slope length and steepness factor, the variation of cover management factor and the variation of conservation practice factor. The identification of these variations improved the model's estimation accuracy. The use of the RUSLE model to estimate the sedimentation in the Lwanyo reservoir is described in Section 5.

The Lwanyo Dam is located in the Mbeya Region in southwestern Tanzania and serves as a vital water resource for domestic use, irrigation and agricultural activities (Figure 1). The storage capacity of the Lwanyo reservoir was 210,153 m3. The reservoir's catchment area covers approximately 39.6 km2 and is characterized by diverse topographical and climatic conditions. The region receives annual rainfall ranging from 986 to 2,200 mm, with significant seasonal variations that influence runoff and sediment transport dynamics. The Mkoji sub-catchment, which is part of the Lwanyo catchment, experiences an average daily river flow of 1 m3/s during the dry season. Spot discharge measurements fluctuate between 0.06 and 0.3 m3/s, reflecting the semi-arid nature of the region (Mbeya Zonal Irrigation Report 2008).

The altitude within the catchment ranges from 1,350 to 2,734 meters above sea level, contributing to varied ecological and erosion patterns. The highlands are cooler, with average annual temperatures of approximately 16 °C, while the lowlands are warmer, with temperatures averaging 25 °C. These climatic gradients, coupled with the tropical climate in the Igurusi area, create conditions where erosion and sediment transport are influenced by both rainfall intensity and temperature-driven vegetation cover changes. The valley leading to the reservoir spans about 7,284 m, with steep gradients upstream and flatter terrain closer to the reservoir. This topographical variation accelerates flow velocities in the southern, steeper parts of the catchment, increasing the potential for soil erosion and sediment deposition downstream.

The reservoir is situated in a region prone to erosion due to anthropogenic activities such as agricultural land expansion and deforestation, which reduce vegetation cover and exacerbate soil degradation. These factors, combined with the catchment's socioeconomic reliance on the reservoir for irrigating approximately 720 ha of farmland, highlight the critical need for sustainable management practices to mitigate sedimentation and preserve the reservoir's functionality.

Table 1 provides a comprehensive overview of the average monthly temperature (°C) and rainfall (mm) for the Lwanyo Reservoir catchment. The data highlight the climatic variations across months, illustrating both temperature and precipitation patterns critical for understanding the region's hydrology and sedimentation dynamics. The region experiences the highest rainfall in March (239 mm) and December (221 mm), coinciding with a relatively stable average temperature of around 21.8–22.7 °C during these months. These wet months contribute significantly to runoff and erosion, influencing sediment transport into the reservoir. Conversely, the driest months are July and August, with minimal rainfall of 9 and 4 mm, respectively, and cooler temperatures averaging 18.6–19.7 °C. These dry conditions, where there is no rainfall, do not contribute to erosion and sediment transport.

Table 1

Average monthly temperature and rainfall

MonthAverage temperature (°C)Rainfall (mm)
Jan 21.9 214 
Feb 21.8 184 
Mar 21.8 239 
Apr 21.5 188 
May 20.3 55 
Jun 19 15 
Jul 18.6 
Aug 19.7 
Sep 21.6 
Oct 23.3 14 
Nov 23.7 86 
Dec 22.7 221 
MonthAverage temperature (°C)Rainfall (mm)
Jan 21.9 214 
Feb 21.8 184 
Mar 21.8 239 
Apr 21.5 188 
May 20.3 55 
Jun 19 15 
Jul 18.6 
Aug 19.7 
Sep 21.6 
Oct 23.3 14 
Nov 23.7 86 
Dec 22.7 221 

The transitional months, such as May and September, show moderate changes, with rainfall decreasing to 55 and 6 mm, respectively, while temperatures begin to rise, marking shifts between wet and dry seasons. The highest temperatures occur in November (23.7 °C) and October (23.3 °C), indicating a warming trend preceding the onset of the rainy season.

This seasonal variation in temperature and rainfall plays a crucial role in influencing erosion potential, soil stability and the hydrological balance of the reservoir catchment, directly impacting sedimentation rates and water management strategies. Understanding these monthly patterns is essential for planning conservation practices and mitigating sedimentation impacts on the reservoir.

In order to estimate the sedimentation in the Lwanyo reservoir, it was found necessary to base parameter values on the topographical characteristic of the catchment that drains to the reservoir.

The rainfall erosivity factor (R)

The rainfall erosivity factor considers the kinetic energy of the 30-min rainfall intensity (EI30) to estimate rainfall erosion potential and the total amount is called the rainfall erosion index (Ghosal & Das Bhattacharya 2020). The soil erosivity is affected by the percentage of organic content in the soil mass (Andoh et al. 2012). The accurate estimation of the rainfall erosivity factor is degraded by inadequate data; therefore, Fu et al. (2006) proposed an equivalent R factor (Req), as a linear function, given as
(2)
where Req is the equivalent R factor for specific climatic conditions and Pr is the annual precipitation in mm. The International Institute of Tropical Agriculture (IITA) also estimates rainfall erosivity using a simple equation based on the maximum annual rainfall (Saptari & Wikantika 2015).
(3)

It is fair to note that the erosivity factor (R) quantifies the potential of rainfall to generate soil erosion based on intensity and duration (Wischmeier & Smith 1978). High erosivity increases the energy of raindrops, leading to significant soil particle detachment and erosion (Ghosal & Das Bhattacharya 2020). It affects sediment transport and contributes to sedimentation in reservoirs, reducing their storage capacity and operational lifespan, as observed in the Lwanyo Reservoir (Moshi et al. 2024). Regions with high erosivity are particularly vulnerable to land degradation, especially when combined with deforestation or poor land management practices (Tundu et al. 2018). Increased sediment deposition in reservoirs shortens their lifespan and exacerbates flood risks due to heightened runoff rates (Jahun et al. 2015b).

Soil erodibility factor (K)

The soil erodibility factor represents the resistance of the soil against erosion due to the impact of a raindrop and the rate and amount of runoff produced for the rainfall impact (Ghosal & Das Bhattacharya 2020). This factor is affected by soil properties such as the percentage of organic matter, sand content, silt soil structure and permeability (Jahun et al. 2015b). This study considered the method developed by El-Swaify & Dangler (1976), which uses the grain size distribution of soil (i.e. % sand, % silt and % clay) and the degree of the saturation of the soil. The soil erodibility factor (K) in Mg h MJ−1 is given as
(4)
where A1 is the percentage of unstable aggregates <0.0250 mm, A2 is the product of silt (0.002–0.01 mm) and sand (0.1–2 mm), A3 is the percentage base saturation of the soil, A4 is the percentage of silt (0.002–0.050 mm) and A5 is the percentage of sand in the soil (0.1–2 mm).

The topographic factor (LS)

The length of the slope (L) and steepness of the slope (S) are proportional to the erosion. The cumulative runoff increases with an increase in slope and steepness. The model uses four slope length relationships as a function of steepness, rill erosion and inter-rill erosion (Renard & Ferreira 1993). Jahun et al. (2015b) suggested a digital elevation model (DEM)-based relationship given as
(5)
Fauzi et al. (2024) proposed that the movement or flow of the soil particulate depends on the gradient steepness, which is expressed in percent (%). The mathematical expression of the LS factor is calculated using
(6)
where x is the gradient length (m) and g is the gradient steepness in %.

Vegetation cover and management factor (C)

This factor represents the influence of soil cover on soil loss, a condition that can be modified by management to minimize erosion. The vegetation cover provides a shield from raindrop impact on the soil surface and dissipates the raindrop energy that would have otherwise impacted the soil surface (Ghosal & Das Bhattacharya 2020). The cover management factor (C) of the RUSLE developed as a function of canopy/surface cover (c) in percentage is as follows:
(7)
where 0 < c < 78.3.

Conservation practice factor (P)

Tundu et al. (2018) report that the conservation factor, P, reflects the control of soil loss by conservation methods. The value depends on whether the area has the maximum conservation or no conservation at all with the value ranging from 0.01 to 1, respectively. Geographic information system (GIS) mapping can be used to estimate the values of the conservation factor.

Calculated values of RUSLE factors

Erosivity factor

Using the annual monthly average rainfall of the Lwanyo catchment suggests that the erosivity factor can provide average rainfall energy for various months within a year. As shown in Equation (2), the rainfall erosivity ranges from 0 (MJ mm ha−1 h−1 yr) for the dry month to 421.39 (MJ mm ha−1 h−1 yr). The maximum value is 421.39 (MJ mm ha−1 h−1 yr) in March and the average value is 110.89 (MJ mm ha−1 h−1 yr). In Equation (3), the rainfall erosivity factor ranges from 1.68 (MJ mm ha−1 h−1 yr) to 160.41 (MJ mm ha−1 h−1 yr). The maximum value is 160.41(MJ mm ha−1 h−1 yr) in March. The total annual erosivity factor is 1,330.66 (MJ mm ha−1 h−1 yr) and 960.095 (MJ mm ha−1 h−1 yr) for Equations (2) and (3), respectively. As a conservative estimate, Equation (2) was used.

Soil erodibility factor (K)

The grain size distribution of the soil was estimated from sediment samples collected in the reservoir, as presented in Figure 2. Table 2 shows the K-values based on soil texture.
Table 2

Soil loss according to soil texture (Siddique et al. 2017)

Soil textureSLK-valueStructurePermeability
Loamy sand 22 0.026 Fine granular Rapid 
Silt 22 0.071 Blocky Moderate 
Clay 22 0.027 Blocky paty massive Very slow 
Soil textureSLK-valueStructurePermeability
Loamy sand 22 0.026 Fine granular Rapid 
Silt 22 0.071 Blocky Moderate 
Clay 22 0.027 Blocky paty massive Very slow 
Figure 1

Location of the Lwanyo Reservoir and its catchment.

Figure 1

Location of the Lwanyo Reservoir and its catchment.

Close modal
Figure 2

Grain size distribution for various depth ranges in mm.

Figure 2

Grain size distribution for various depth ranges in mm.

Close modal

Topographic factor (LS)

Figure 3 shows the topography of the catchment upstream of the Lwanyo Dam. The southern part of the catchment is steep and the grade decreases towards the reservoir. The potential for high-flow velocities is greater in the southern areas and velocities decrease as the grades flatten. Applying Equation (6), the LS value is 9.086.
Figure 3

The topography of the catchment upstream of the Lwanyo Dam.

Figure 3

The topography of the catchment upstream of the Lwanyo Dam.

Close modal

The vegetation cover and the management factor (C)

The vegetation cover and management cover (P) is given in Equation (7). For an average value of c of 39.15%, the value of C is 0.1045.

Conservation practice factor (P)

The catchment upstream of the Lwanyo Dam is a conservation area, and the value of the P factor is adopted from Wischmeier & Smith (1978), as reproduced in Table 3. For a slope of 19%, the value of the P factor is 0.14.

Table 3

Land canopy management factor (P) (Wischmeier & Smith 1978)

Land-use typeSlope (%)P-factor value
Agricultural land 0–5 0.1 
5–0 0.12 
10–20 0.11
20–30 0.19 
30–50 0.25 
50–100 0.33 
Other land All 
Land-use typeSlope (%)P-factor value
Agricultural land 0–5 0.1 
5–0 0.12 
10–20 0.11
20–30 0.19 
30–50 0.25 
50–100 0.33 
Other land All 

Results of the RUSLE model

Applying the values indicated in Section 6.1.1–6.1.5 into Equation (1) where factors R, K, LS, C and P are 421.39, 0.071, 10.69, 0.1045 and 0.14, respectively, the value is 4.68 tonnes/ha/year. Moshi et al. (2024) reported that the volume of sediment deposited in the reservoir over an 8-year period was 58,349 m3. Based on an assumed sediment porosity of 0.4 and a sediment density of 1,750 kg/m3, this equates to a mass of sediment of 61,266 tonnes.

Averaged over the catchment area of 3,960 ha, this gives an average annual sediment export from the catchment of 1.934 tonnes/ha/year. The difference may be attributed to the silt that flows out during the rainy season since the flows are observed to be turbid.

Model limitations

The study, which applies the RUSLE model to estimate sedimentation in the Lwanyo Reservoir, highlights several limitations. Key constraints include reliance on average parameter values (e.g., rainfall erosivity and soil erodibility) that may not capture spatial and temporal variability within the catchment (Ghosal & Das Bhattacharya 2020). The model's inability to explicitly simulate complex sediment transport and deposition processes contributes to discrepancies between modelled (3.977 tonnes/ha/year) and observed (1.934 tonnes/ha/year) sedimentation rates (Moshi et al. 2024). Data gaps, such as incomplete hydrological records, and simplified assumptions about topography and slope uniformity further reduce accuracy (Renard et al. 1997). Additionally, external factors like deforestation, land-use changes and climate variability are not dynamically integrated, limiting the model's predictive utility over time (Tundu et al. 2018). These factors suggest a need for complementary methods to enhance sedimentation estimates.

This study aimed to assess whether the RUSLE model provided a rate of sedimentation that matches the rate of sedimentation observed in the Lwanyo Reservoir in the Mbarali District of Tanzania. The Lwanyo reservoir catchment was calculated to experience erosivity factors (R) with values up to 421.39 (MJ mm ha−1 h−1 yr) in March, a soil erodibility (K) of 0.071, a topographic factor (LS) of 9.086, a vegetation cover and management factor (C) of 0.1045, and a conservation practice factor P of 0.14. The RUSLE Model estimated the annual average soil loss of 3.977 tonnes/ha/year. In comparison, the recorded sedimentation in the reservoir over 8 years, averaged over the catchment area of 3,960 ha, equates to an average annual sediment export from the catchment of 1.934 tonnes/ha/year.

Given that the observed sedimentation has reduced the reservoir capacity by 27.7%, it is estimated that the reservoir would be filled with sediment within a further 20 years in the absence of intervention measures. It is concluded that reducing catchment anthropogenic activities and practising catchment afforestation will reduce soil loss and prolong the life of the reservoir.

The authors acknowledge the support and permission extended to them by the Mbeya University of Science and Technology.

This work was supported by the Mbeya University of Science and Technology as part of postgraduate studies.

B.M. conceptualized the study and wrote, reviewed, and edited the article. Z.K. wrote, reviewed, and edited the article.

All relevant data are included in the paper or its Supplementary Information.

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest.

Andoh
H. F.
,
Antwi
B. O.
&
Atakora
E. T.
(
2012
)
Estimation of soil erodibility and rainfall erosivity patterns in the agroecological zones of Ghana
,
Journal of Soil Science and Environmental Management
,
3
(
11
),
275
279
.
El-Swaify
S.
&
Dangler
E.
, (
1976
)
Erodibilities of selected tropical soils in relation to structural and hydrologic parameters
. In:
Foster
G.
(ed.)
Soil Erosion Prediction and Control
,
Ankeny
:
Soil and Water Conservation Society
, pp.
105
114
.
Ezugwu
C.
(
2013
)
Sediment deposition in Nigeria Reservoirs: impacts and control measures
,
Innovative Systems Design and Engineering
,
4
,
54
62
.
Fauzi
M.
,
Refika
C. D.
,
Azmeri
A.
,
Fatimah
E.
&
Shaskia
N.
(
2024
)
Estimation of soil erosion hazard in the Simpo Subwatershed, Indonesia
,
E3S Web of Conferences
,
476
.
https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202447601046
.
Fu
G.
,
Chen
S.
&
McCool
D. K.
(
2006
)
Modeling the impacts of no-till practice on soil erosion and sediment yield with RUSLE, SEDD, and ArcView GIS
,
Soil and Tillage Research
,
85
(
1
),
38
49
.
Ghosal
K.
&
Das Bhattacharya
S.
(
2020
)
A review of RUSLE model
,
Journal of the Indian Society of Remote Sensing
,
48
,
689
707
.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12524-020-01130-1
.
Goel
M. K.
,
Jain
S. K.
&
Agarwal
P. K.
(
2002
)
Assessment of sediment deposition rate in Bargi Reservoir using digital image processing
,
Hydrological Sciences Journal
,
47
(
Suppl 1
),
S81
S92
.
Heidarnejad
M.
,
Golmaee
S. H.
,
Abolfazl Mosaedi
A.
&
Ahmadi
M. Z.
(
2006
)
Estimation of sediment volume in Karaj Dam Reservoir (Iran) by hydrometry method and a comparison with hydrography method
,
Lake and Reservoir Management
,
22
(
3
),
233
239
.
Huang
C.-C.
,
Lai
J.-S.
,
Lee
F.-Z.
&
Tan
Y.-C.
(
2018
)
Physical model-based investigation of reservoir sedimentation processes
,
Water
,
10
(
4
),
352
.
https://doi.org/10.3390/w10040352
.
Inoue
N.
,
Hamanaka
A.
,
Shimada
H.
,
Sasaoka
T.
&
Matsui
K.
(
2015
)
Fundamental study on assessment of soil erosion by the USLE method at rehabilitation area in Indonesian coal mine
,
Earth Science Research
,
4
(
1
),
61
67
.
Jahun
B. G.
,
Ibrahim
R.
,
Dlamini
N. S.
&
Musa
S. M.
(
2015a
)
Review of soil erosion assessment using RUSLE model and GIS
,
Journal of Biology, Agriculture and Healthcare
,
5
(
9
),
36
47
.
Jahun
B. G.
,
Ibrahim
R.
,
Dlamini
N. S.
&
Musa
S. M.
(
2015b
)
Review of soil erosion assessment using RUSLE model and GIS
,
Journal of Biology, Agriculture and Healthcare
,
5
(
9
),
36
47
.
Jain
R.
,
Rivera
M. C.
,
Moore
J. E.
&
Lake
J. A.
(
2002
)
Horizontal gene transfer in microbial genome evolution
,
Theoretical Population Biology
,
61
(
4
),
489
495
.
Jothiprakash
V.
&
Garg
V.
(
2009
)
Reservoir sedimentation estimation using artificial neural network
,
Journal of Hydrologic Engineering
,
14
(
9
),
1035
1040
.
Katambara
Z.
&
Ndiritu
J.
(
2009
)
A fuzzy inference system for modelling streamflow: case of Letaba River, South Africa
,
Physics and Chemistry of the Earth, Parts A/B/C
,
34
,
688
700
.
Katambara
Z.
&
Ndiritu
J. G.
(
2010
)
A hybrid conceptual–fuzzy inference streamflow modelling for the Letaba River system in South Africa
,
Physics and Chemistry of the Earth, Parts A/B/C
,
35
(
13–14
),
582
595
.
Mbeya Zonal Irrigation Unit Report
(
2008
).
Dam Sites Report June 2008
,
1
5
.
Mkhandi
S. H.
,
Mbwette
T. S. A.
&
Mashauri
D. A.
(
2003
)
Assessment of the impact of urbanization of river catchments in Dar es Salaam City and its periphery on stormwater runoff
,
The Tanzania Engineer
,
7
(
5
),
31
43
.
Moore
I. D.
&
Burch
G. J.
(
1986
)
Modelling erosion and deposition: topographic effects
,
Transactions of American Society of Agriculture Engineering
,
29
,
1624
1630
.
http://dx.doi.org/10.13031/2013.30363
.
Moriasi
D. N.
,
Arnold
J. G.
,
Van Liew
M. W.
,
Bingner
R. L.
,
Harmel
R. D.
&
Veith
T. L.
(
2007
)
Model evaluation guidelines for systematic quantification of accuracy in watershed simulations
,
Transactions of the ASABE
,
50
,
885
900
.
Moshi
B.
,
Katambara
Z.
&
Lingwanda
M.
(
2024
)
Assessment of siltation impact and mitigation strategies for sustaining storage capacity in Lwanyo Dam, Tanzania
,
MUST Journal of Research and Development
,
5
(
3
),
886
893
.
https://doi.org/10.62277/mjrd2024v5i30058
.
Ndiritu
J. G.
&
Daniell
T. M.
(
1999
)
Assessing model calibration adequacy via global optimisation
,
Water SA
,
25
(
3
),
317
326
.
Ngongondo
C.
,
Xu
C.-Y.
,
Tallaksen
L. M.
,
Alemaw
B.
&
Chirwa
T.
(
2011
)
Regional frequency analysis of rainfall extremes in Southern Malawi using the index rainfall and L-moments approaches
,
Stoch. Environ. Res. Risk Assess.
,
25
,
939
955
.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00477-011-0480-x
.
Renard
K. G.
&
Ferreira
V. A.
(
1993
)
RUSLE model description and database sensitivity
,
Journal of Environmental Quality
,
22
(
3
),
458
466
.
Renard
K. G.
,
Ferreira
V. A.
&
Foster
G. R.
(
1997
)
Predicting soil erosion by water: a guide to conservation planning with the Revised Universal Soil Loss Equation (RUSLE)
.
Agriculture Handbook No. 703
,
Washington, D.C
:
USDA
.
Saptari
A. Y.
&
Wikantika
K.
(
2015
)
Remote sensing analysis in RUSLE erosion estimation, Indonesian Journal of Geospatial, 4 (1), 34–45
.
Siddique
M. N. A.
,
Sultana
J.
,
Abdullah
M. R.
&
Azad
K. N.
(
2017
)
Modelling of soil loss through RUSLE2 for soil management in an agricultural field of Uccle, Belgium
,
British Journal of Environment & Climate Change
,
7
(
4
),
252
260
.
Snyder
P. K.
,
Delire
C.
&
Foley
J. A.
(
2004
)
Evaluating the influence of different vegetation biomes on the global climate
,
Climate Dynamics
,
23
,
279
302
.
Swilla
L.
,
Katambara
Z.
&
Lingwanda
M.
(
2024
)
Calibration and verification of a hydrological SWMM model for the ungauged Kinyerezi River catchment in Dar es Salaam, Tanzania
,
Modelling Earth Systems and Environment
,
1
16
.
Tundu
C.
,
Tumbare
M. J.
&
Onema
J. M. K.
(
2018
)
Sedimentation and its impacts/effects on river system and reservoir water quality: case study of Mazowe catchment, Zimbabwe
,
Proceedings of the International Association of Hydrological Sciences
,
377
(
3
),
57
66
.
https://doi.org/10.5194/piahs-377-57-2018
.
Wischmeier
W. H.
&
Smith
D. D.
(
1978
)
Prediction Erosion Losses
.
USDA Agriculture Handbook 537
.
Washington, D.C
:
United States Government Print Office
.
Wohl
E. E.
&
Cenderelli
D. A.
(
2000
)
Sediment deposition and transport patterns following a reservoir sediment release
,
Water Resources Research
,
36
(
1
),
319
333
.
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Licence (CC BY-ND 4.0), which permits copying and redistribution with no derivatives, provided the original work is properly cited (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/).