The study looked at the presence, distribution, and composition of polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) in rivers and wells in a specific region of Nigeria. It is critical to monitor their spread and presence in the environment. PCB levels in well water and rivers in Oyo and Delta states were measured using gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS). The sample concentrations ranged from 0.02 ± 0.01 to 1.44 ± 0.04 mg/L, 0.01 ± 0.00 to 0.57 ± 0.02 mg/L, 0.02 ± 0.01 to 1.66 ± 0.01 mg/L, and 0.00 ± 0.00 to 13.18 ± 0.05 mg/L. The congener distribution patterns in these samples show a preference for highly chlorinated homolog compounds (penta- and di-PCB). The concentrations of PCBs in rivers and wells were below the 50 mg/L levels established by the Basel convention's persistent organic pollutant (POP) waste management criteria as a temporary criterion for low content in PCBs. The sample's PCB levels exceeded the US EPA's 0.00005 ppm standard. Furthermore, PCB levels exceeded the Dutch standard of 1,000 μg/L. River 3 exhibited the greatest mean concentration (32.04 ± 0.35 mg/L). Because of the progressive lifetime assessment of PCBs in these samples, anyone who was exposed to them ran a high risk of acquiring cancer. To assess their threat to the ecosystem, a surveillance plan must be created in these areas.

  • The concentration of polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) in surface and underground water was measured from South-West Nigeria.

  • Low-chlorinated congeners of PCBs dominated in the water sample.

  • Infants are more susceptible to PCB exposure and its harmful effects than teenagers and adults.

  • Exposure to PCBs can cause a variety of health problems.

  • The sample's PCB levels exceeded the US EPA's 0.00005 ppm standard.

Polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) are globally recognized as major environmental pollutants due to their persistence, bioaccumulative nature, and toxic effects on both humans and wildlife. These synthetic organic chemicals were extensively produced and used in industrial applications for their excellent dielectric properties, hydrophobicity, thermal stability, and resistance to degradation (Lauby-Secretan et al. 2018). PCBs have historically been used in products such as electrical transformers, capacitors, paints, plastics, adhesives, and hydraulic fluids, contributing to their widespread adoption (Wimmerová et al. 2020). However, concerns over their environmental persistence and long-range transport, coupled with evidence of their harmful health effects, led to a global ban under the Stockholm Convention on Persistent Organic Pollutants (UNEP 2018).

Despite this ban, PCBs remain a significant environmental concern, particularly in developing countries where these compounds are still present in old equipment, waste sites, and contaminated environments (Iwegbue 2020). Numerous studies have demonstrated the adverse effects of PCB exposure, including endocrine disruption, immunotoxicity, and carcinogenicity in humans, as well as reproductive failures in wildlife (Ediagbonya et al. 2015; Wang et al. 2018; Klaren et al. 2019; Haddaoui et al. 2021). PCB exposure has also been linked to deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) sequence changes and oxidative stress, which may exacerbate health risks (Zhang et al. 2022). Recent studies have also highlighted the contamination of water sources by both heavy metals and persistent organic pollutants such as PCBs, emphasizing the risks associated with these pollutants in rainwater harvesting systems and rivers (Ediagbonya & Gbolahan 2018; Ediagbonya et al. 2022; Halfadji et al. 2022).

Water pollution, especially with persistent organic pollutants like PCBs, is a pressing environmental issue. Rivers and wells are critical sources of drinking water, agricultural irrigation, and industrial use, yet they are increasingly contaminated by runoff, industrial discharge, and improper waste management (Igwe et al. 2018). In Nigeria, limited studies have focused on the contamination of rivers and groundwater by PCBs, leaving a significant research gap (Ediagbonya et al. 2022, 2023a, 2023b, 2023c). Understanding the contamination levels in these water bodies is essential for developing effective mitigation strategies and ensuring public health safety.

Study area

The study was conducted in three distinct locations: the Forcados River in Bomadi Local Government Area (LGA) of Delta State, Lake Eleyele in Ido LGA of Oyo State, and wells in Apete, also in Ido LGA (Figure 1). These sites were selected due to their proximity to industrial and agricultural activities, which contribute significantly to pollution. The population in these areas depends heavily on these water sources for drinking, irrigation, fishing, and domestic activities.
Figure 1

Showing the various sampling locations.

Figure 1

Showing the various sampling locations.

Close modal
Figure 2

Percentage contribution of PCBs in the different locations.

Figure 2

Percentage contribution of PCBs in the different locations.

Close modal

The Forcados River, located in Bomadi LGA, is a tributary of the Niger River. This river spans an average width of 1.6 km and supports key ecosystem services such as fisheries, agriculture, and transportation for the local communities. The surrounding region is characterized by tropical rainforest vegetation, with average annual rainfall exceeding 2,500 mm. The area experiences a humid tropical climate, with temperatures ranging between 23 and 33 °C throughout the year. Economic activities along the river include fishing, small-scale farming, and jetty operations. However, the river faces significant pollution from oil spills, wastewater runoff, and improper waste disposal (Igwe et al. 2018).

Lake Eleyele, located northwest of Ibadan in Ido LGA, Oyo State, was created in 1939 by damming the Ona River. The lake has an area of approximately 1.1 km2 and is fed by several streams, including Otaru, Awba, Yemoja, and Alapo. It provides ecosystem services such as irrigation, flood control, and water supply for domestic and industrial purposes. The region receives average rainfall of about 1,200 mm annually, with a peak during the months of July and September. Temperatures in the area range from 24 to 32 °C. Economic activities include agriculture, fishing, and sand mining. Pollution sources in the lake include agricultural runoff, urban wastewater, and siltation from nearby construction activities (Imevbore 2019).

The wells in Apete, Ido LGA, are shallow groundwater sources used by local residents for drinking and domestic purposes. These wells are located near residential areas, often close to abandoned ponds and poorly managed waste sites. The surrounding area experiences an average annual rainfall of 1,300 mm, with temperatures ranging between 23 and 34 °C. Economic activities include small-scale farming, trading, and informal waste management. Due to inadequate depth and proximity to contamination sources, these wells are highly susceptible to pollution from heavy metals, microorganisms, and chemical spills (Igwe et al. 2018).

The selected sites represent critical water sources for their respective communities. The Forcados River and Lake Eleyele provide fishing and irrigation opportunities, while the wells in Apete serve as a primary drinking water source. Understanding the extent of PCB contamination in these locations is vital for assessing health risks and developing mitigation strategies. These sites also reflect typical water resource challenges in developing countries, where industrial and agricultural activities threaten ecosystem integrity.

Collection of water samples

The water samples were collected from three selected sites: the Forcados River (Bomadi LGA, Delta State), Lake Eleyele (Ido LGA, Oyo State), and Apete Wells (Ido LGA, Oyo State). These sites were chosen due to their ecological and hydrological significance, their proximity to potential pollution sources, and their importance to local communities. The Forcados River serves as a major tributary of the Niger River and is exposed to industrial and agricultural runoff (Igwe et al. 2018). Lake Eleyele is an essential reservoir for irrigation and domestic water use (Imevbore 2019), while Apete Wells are critical for drinking water in the region, often located near waste sites and abandoned ponds.

The selection of sampling sites was based on land-use patterns, proximity to pollution sources, and the hydrological significance of the water bodies. The Forcados River and Lake Eleyele were selected due to their susceptibility to industrial and agricultural pollutants, while the Apete Wells were chosen to assess contamination in groundwater from nearby human activities (Igwe et al. 2018).

A total of 40 surface water samples and 20 groundwater samples were collected to ensure spatial coverage of the study sites. Sampling points were determined based on accessibility and coverage, with a sampling frequency of approximately 5 km intervals along the rivers and lakes. Samples were collected during a single dry season to minimize hydrological variability and ensure consistency in results.

For each location, 1.5 L of water was collected in pre-cleaned glass sampling vials. Surface water samples were taken from the midstream of rivers and lakes at approximately 1 m depth using a weighted sampling device, while groundwater samples were collected from wells using a sterilized hand pump. The samples were labeled, sealed, and immediately transported to the laboratory under chilled conditions (4 °C) to prevent degradation. Table 1 provides detailed coordinates and the methods used for sample collection.

Table 1

The location and coordinates of surface water and groundwater analyzed

Sample sourceCodeLocationCoordinatesMethod
Forcados River River 3 Bomadi, Delta State 5.164056N, 5.920500E Midstream sampling at 1 m depth 
Lake Eleyele River A1 Eleyele, Oyo State 7.415322N, 3.851190E Weighted sampling device 
Apete River River H2O Apete, Oyo State 7.454000N, 3.881306E Midstream sampling at 1 m depth 
Apete Wells 10 cm Well Apete, Oyo State 7.455306N, 3.876750E Hand-pumped collection 
Sample sourceCodeLocationCoordinatesMethod
Forcados River River 3 Bomadi, Delta State 5.164056N, 5.920500E Midstream sampling at 1 m depth 
Lake Eleyele River A1 Eleyele, Oyo State 7.415322N, 3.851190E Weighted sampling device 
Apete River River H2O Apete, Oyo State 7.454000N, 3.881306E Midstream sampling at 1 m depth 
Apete Wells 10 cm Well Apete, Oyo State 7.455306N, 3.876750E Hand-pumped collection 

Note. River 3 (Forcados River), River A1 (Lake Eyeleye), River H2O (Apete River), and 10 cm Well (Well water along Kolawole Olayiwola close, Apete.

To ensure the reliability of results, method blanks, duplicates, and standard reference materials (SRM) were included. Samples were spiked with 13C12-labeled PCB congeners to validate recovery rates, which ranged from 89.9 to 99.8%. Data analysis was performed using the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) software (version 26), with all computations conducted at a 95% confidence interval. The calibration lines for PCB concentrations demonstrated r2 values ranging from 0.9995 to 0.9999, ensuring high precision in quantification (SERAS 2006).

Quality control/assurance and statistical analysis

To ensure the reliability and accuracy of the data, multiple quality control and assurance measures were implemented. Method blanks, surrogate standards, and duplicates of the SRM were used to evaluate the representativeness, precision, and repeatability of the analyses. Matrix-spiked samples and 13C12-labeled PCB congeners were employed to validate the recovery of targeted compounds. Recovery rates for the 13C12 PCB congeners ranged between 89.9 and 99.8%, while PCB spike recovery rates ranged from 69.9 to 98.5%. These recovery rates fall within acceptable ranges established in similar studies (e.g., 70–120% for environmental monitoring; Reddy et al. 2019) and highlight the effectiveness of the analytical procedures used.

Analytical precision was maintained by calibrating the gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS) system using five-point serial dilution standards. Limits of detection (LOD) and quantification (LOQ) were calculated based on the signal-to-noise ratios of 3:1 and 10:1, respectively. For PCB congeners, LOD values ranged from 0.3 to 1.7 ng/g, while LOQ values ranged from 1.0 to 5.0 ng/g. These values are significant in environmental monitoring as they ensure the detection of PCB concentrations even at trace levels, allowing for robust assessment of contamination risks (Zhao et al. 2019).

Statistical analysis

All data analyses were conducted using the SPSS, version 26. Analytical procedures included external calibration and the use of r2 values (0.9995–0.9999) to ensure accuracy in quantification. The mean PCB levels for each location were compared using analysis of variance (ANOVA) at a 95% confidence level (p = 0.05). These statistical methods facilitated the identification of significant differences in PCB concentrations across the study sites.

By adhering to rigorous quality control measures and statistical analysis, the study ensures the reliability and validity of its findings, providing a strong foundation for further environmental assessments.

Extraction according to the normal operating method

The extraction of PCBs from surface and groundwater samples followed the procedures outlined in SERAS (2006). Methylene chloride was used as the extraction solvent due to its high efficiency in separating hydrophobic organic compounds like PCBs from aqueous matrices. The process was carried out at a neutral pH, achieved by adjusting with a 1:1 sulfuric acid solution or 10 N sodium hydroxide. Maintaining a neutral pH is critical for preventing the degradation or loss of PCB congeners during the extraction process (Reddy et al. 2019). This approach ensured the preservation of analyte integrity and improved recovery rates.

Extraction procedure

Approximately 1 L of water from each sample was extracted in series with methylene chloride. Process blanks and laboratory control samples were prepared by adding surrogate working solutions of 200 ng/mL to the samples before extraction. The extracts were concentrated to a final volume of 10 mL to enhance the detectability of PCBs. Excess pressure was vented periodically during the process, and the separating funnel was shaken for 2 minutes to ensure efficient mixing.

For solvent exchange, 60 mL of hexane was added to the extracts, which were then filtered through a funnel containing glass wool and anhydrous sodium sulfate to remove moisture and particulates. The combined extract was concentrated to a final volume of 1 mL and analyzed using GC-MS.

Instrumental analysis

AccuStandard supplied PCBs standard, 2,000 ppm (Catalogue Number: M-8080) with 17 PCB components. The GC-MS was calibrated using five-point serial dilution calibration standards (1.00, 0.25, and 0.05 ppm) taken from stock. Prior to calibration, the abundance of m/z 69, 219, and 502, as well as other instrument optimum and sensitivity parameters, were validated using stated criteria to auto-tune the MS to perfluorotributylamine. To accomplish low-level detection of the target components, the amount of PCBs in the sample was measured by GC-MS in selective ion monitoring (SIM) and scan mode. The Agilent Technologies 5975C inert mass spectrometer was coupled to an Agilent 7820A gas chromatograph. It had a triple-axis detector and an electron-impact source. Agilent Technologies' HP-5 capillary column (30 m length × 0.32 mm diameter × 0.25 m film thickness) coated with 5% phenyl methyl siloxane served as the stationary phase for compound separation. Helium was used as the carrier gas, with an average velocity of 40.00 cm/s and an initial nominal pressure of 026 psi. The gas was used at a constant flow rate of 1.2 mL/min. In splitless mode, the samples were injected into a 1 mL volume at 250 °C. When the gas saver mode was turned off, the purge flow to the overflowing vent was 30.0 mL/min for 0.35 min, and 31.24 mL/min overall. After 1 minute at 110 °C, the oven was immediately heated to 310 °C for 3 min, with a 15 °C increase per minute. With a 3-min solvent delay, the run took 16 min. The mass spectrometer was configured for electron-impact ionization at 70 eV, with the quadrupole temperature at 150 °C, the transfer line temperature at 300 °C, and the ion source temperature at 230 °C. To obtain the ions, two modes of operation were employed: selective ion mode (SIM) and scan mode, which involved scanning from m/z 35 to 550 amu at a rate of 2.0 s per scan. Following calibration, the samples were analyzed to determine the appropriate PCB content.

Risk assessment

The danger of human exposure to PCBs in surface and subsurface water was determined using dioxin-like PCB congener chemicals. Equation (1) was used to get the UCL95% concentration:
(1)
where does Type 1 error (false positive) have the highest probability of occurring? X represents the arithmetic mean of the concentrations, β denotes skewness, and SD denotes standard deviation. Z is the (1-)th quantile of the standard normal distribution. According to Kustova et al. (2021) and Iwegbue (2020), Z = 1.645, where n is the number of samples with a 95% confidence level.

Examining PCB hazard indices and average daily exposure

By using equations to calculate the three exposure routes' average daily exposures, the chronic daily intake was calculated. US EPA (2019) states as follows:
(2)
(3)
(4)

Long-term daily doses for oral, respiratory, and skin contact are denoted by CDIing-nc, CDIinh-nc, and CDIderm-nc, respectively. The PCB concentrations in water samples that meet the UCL95% are referred to as CUCL (mg kg−1). In this case, people were supposed to ingest 100 mg of water each day, or IngR. An annual exposure frequency of 350 days was examined, excluding 15 vacation days. The exposure duration is stated in years. ‘ABSD’ stands for ‘dermal absorption factor’ (0.14 for PCB), ‘SA’ for ‘surface area of the skin in contact with water’ (cm−2), ‘AF’ for ‘skin adherence factor for water’ (mg cm−2), ‘ATnc’ for ‘averaging time for non-carcinogens’ in days, and ‘CF’ for ‘conversion factor’ (1 × 10−6 kg mg−1).

Table 2 shows the mean and standard deviations of PCB concentrations, as well as the ANOVA results and post-hoc tests represented by alphabetic superscripts. The ANOVA shows significant differences in PCB concentrations among four locations (F-statistic = 2,434.310, p < 0.001). To discover which groups differ significantly from each other. Superscripts represent the outcomes of post-hoc tests that were carried out. In RIVER A1, di-PCBs (0.07 ± 0.01 mg/L) and hepta-PCBs (0.07 ± 0.01 mg/L) had similar mean values but differ statistically from penta-PCBs (0.65 ± 0.01 mg/L) and tri-PCBs (0.75 ± 0.04 mg/L). RIVER 3 has significantly higher mean concentration of total PCBs (32.04 ± 0.35 mg/L) compared to RIVER H2O (13.61 ± 0.31ᵃ mg/L) and 10 cm WELL (22.59 ± 0.00 mg/L). Post-hoc tests provide a clear distinction between locations, allowing us to better understand PCB distribution and relevance in each setting. However, the United States prohibited the production of PCBs after it was determined that they were harmful to the environment and should be classified as persistent organic pollutants (Batang et al. 2016; Carrizo et al. 2021). Regardless of their mix, they are viscous liquids or solids that range in color from clear to yellow, have no taste or odor, are extremely stable, and can withstand high pressures and temperatures (Reddy et al. 2019). In this study, three river water samples and one well water sample were collected, and 17 PCB congeners were discovered. The findings demonstrated the dispersion and bioaccumulation of PCBs in various natural environments. In general, PCB levels were higher in river water than in groundwater. PCB values in river water vary from 0.01 ± 0.00 to 1.66 ± 0.01 mg/L. PCB 61 and PCB 5 have the highest mean concentrations, whilst 206 has the lowest. Unintentional spills and leaks during transit, as well as fires or product leaks containing PCBs, all contribute to PCB contamination of rivers (Gorshkov et al. 2017). River 3 has the highest levels of PCBs (32.04 ± 0.35 mg/L) due to jetty boat emissions, sewage dumps, and wastewater runoff from polluted areas (Net et al. 2015). River 3 and River H2O have greater PCB5 concentrations than other test sites, which could be linked to flooding and pollution, both of which endanger persons and ecosystems (Rudel et al. 2008; Cohn et al. 2012). In contrast, 10 cm wells had less PCB congeners found than river samples, with PCB 47, 151, 161, 159, 183, and 189 all falling below detection limits (BDL). PCB 17 has the highest mean concentration among all samples (13.18 ± 0.05 mg/L), indicating a hazard to the environment. This is owing to the inadequate depth of the well, which draws water from an abandoned pond contaminated with heavy metals, microbes, leaks and spills. PCBs 5, 21, 61, and 187 were found to be significantly elevated in River A1. This is most likely due to point sources causing localized high PCB congeners. A range of other variables, such as hydrodynamics and crystal size, can also affect PCB concentration (Moraleda-Cibrián et al. 2015; Gao et al. 2018). With the exception of PCB 5 and 99, which have greater values in H2O PCB, all other PCB congeners are below the EPA limit. This could be linked to the PCBs that these small-scale enterprises release into the river system. In May 2015, many stations identified a high level of five PCBs in the upper water layer (5 m) in the South Atlantic Basin, with a value of 3.1 ng/L. According to Unyimadu et al. (2018), Nigeria has no regulatory control limits for PCBs in water. To assess the importance of PCBs in these samples, we used the recommended PCB levels in water provided by a few international regulatory authorities. PCB levels are specified at 1,000 μg kg−1 for the Dutch action value and the Australian and New Zealand Ecological Investigation Level (VROM 1994), 1,300 μg kg−1 for the Canadian authority's water quality guidelines (CCME 2007), and 220 μg kg−1 for the US EPA's health-based screening level for total PCBs, which aims to prevent harmful health effects associated with chronic exposure (Oksanen et al. 2019; Kustova et al. 2021).

Table 2

Concentration of PCB in rivers and well

Rivers A1River 3River H2O10 cm wellF-valuep-value
PCB3 0.07 ± 0.01a BDL BDL 0.10 ± 0.01b 5.000 0.155 
PCB5 1.37 ± 1.61a 0.57 ± 0.02 1.66 ± 0.01a 1.66 ± 0.01a 1.080 0.453 
PCB17 BDL 0.03 ± 0.01b 0.04 ± 0.02b 13.18 ± 0.05a 117,146.509 0.000 
PCB21 1.44 ± 0.04b 0.04 ± 0.02b 0.02 ± 0.01b 0.65 ± 0.01a 1,533.638 0.000 
PCB47 BDL 0.02 ± 0.01b 0.02 ± 0.01b BDL 0.200 0.698 
PCB61 0.75 ± 0.04a 0.01 ± 0.00b BDL 0.07 ± 0.01a 689.587 0.000 
PCB99 0.49 ± 0.01a 0.26 ± 0.04b 1.04 ± 0.02a 0.65 ± 0.00b 371.391 0.000 
PCB98 0.02 ± 0.01b 0.34 ± 0.01a 0.03 ± 0.00b 0.00 ± 0.00 848.811 0.000 
PCB111 0.03 ± 0.01b 0.27 ± 0.01a 0.03 ± 0.01b 0.03 ± 0.03 101.879 0.000 
PCB151 0.02 ± 0.01b 0.04 ± 0.02b 0.19 ± 0.03a BDL 42.346 0.006 
PCB161 0.04 ± 0.01b 0.02 ± 0.01b 0.15 ± 0.02b BDL 40.786 0.007 
PCB159 0.02 ± 0.01b 0.03 ± 0.01b BDL BDL 0.500 0.553 
PCB168 0.04 ± 0.01b 0.03 ± 0.01b 0.03 ± 0.01b 0.02 ± 0.01 1.733 0.290 
PCB183 0.03 ± 0.01b BDL 0.04 ± 0.01b BDL 2.000 0.293 
PCB189 BDL BDL 0.03 ± 0.01b BDL – – 
PCB187 0.72 ± 0.06a 0.02 ± 0.01b BDL 0.64 ± 0.06ᵂ 121.733 0.001 
PCB206 0.55 ± 0.00a 0.01 ± 0.00b 0.44 ± 0.03b 0.38 ± 0.01 438.667 0.000 
Total PCB 10.38 ± 0.11a 32.04 ± 0.35a 13.61 ± 0.31a 22.59 ± 0.01 2,434.310 0.000 
Rivers A1River 3River H2O10 cm wellF-valuep-value
PCB3 0.07 ± 0.01a BDL BDL 0.10 ± 0.01b 5.000 0.155 
PCB5 1.37 ± 1.61a 0.57 ± 0.02 1.66 ± 0.01a 1.66 ± 0.01a 1.080 0.453 
PCB17 BDL 0.03 ± 0.01b 0.04 ± 0.02b 13.18 ± 0.05a 117,146.509 0.000 
PCB21 1.44 ± 0.04b 0.04 ± 0.02b 0.02 ± 0.01b 0.65 ± 0.01a 1,533.638 0.000 
PCB47 BDL 0.02 ± 0.01b 0.02 ± 0.01b BDL 0.200 0.698 
PCB61 0.75 ± 0.04a 0.01 ± 0.00b BDL 0.07 ± 0.01a 689.587 0.000 
PCB99 0.49 ± 0.01a 0.26 ± 0.04b 1.04 ± 0.02a 0.65 ± 0.00b 371.391 0.000 
PCB98 0.02 ± 0.01b 0.34 ± 0.01a 0.03 ± 0.00b 0.00 ± 0.00 848.811 0.000 
PCB111 0.03 ± 0.01b 0.27 ± 0.01a 0.03 ± 0.01b 0.03 ± 0.03 101.879 0.000 
PCB151 0.02 ± 0.01b 0.04 ± 0.02b 0.19 ± 0.03a BDL 42.346 0.006 
PCB161 0.04 ± 0.01b 0.02 ± 0.01b 0.15 ± 0.02b BDL 40.786 0.007 
PCB159 0.02 ± 0.01b 0.03 ± 0.01b BDL BDL 0.500 0.553 
PCB168 0.04 ± 0.01b 0.03 ± 0.01b 0.03 ± 0.01b 0.02 ± 0.01 1.733 0.290 
PCB183 0.03 ± 0.01b BDL 0.04 ± 0.01b BDL 2.000 0.293 
PCB189 BDL BDL 0.03 ± 0.01b BDL – – 
PCB187 0.72 ± 0.06a 0.02 ± 0.01b BDL 0.64 ± 0.06ᵂ 121.733 0.001 
PCB206 0.55 ± 0.00a 0.01 ± 0.00b 0.44 ± 0.03b 0.38 ± 0.01 438.667 0.000 
Total PCB 10.38 ± 0.11a 32.04 ± 0.35a 13.61 ± 0.31a 22.59 ± 0.01 2,434.310 0.000 

Below detection limit (BDL); Mean with different superscripts is statistically significant @p < 0.05, ‘a’ means no significant difference when it appears in two different locations but ‘a and b’ mean significant difference in different locations. F is the ANOVA statistics value, Sig is the significance. w = Indicates outlier value due to unique pollution source or analytical variation.

Table 3 displays significant changes in PCB concentrations and their statistical significance, as determined by ANOVA and post-hoc tests, with alphabetic superscripts.

Table 3

Concentration of PCB homologs in different locations

PCBRIVER A1RIVER 3RIVER H2O10 cm wellF-valueSig.
Di-PCB 8.09 ± 0.09a 20.69 ± 0.28a 10.59 ± 0.28a 16.57c 1,172.378 0.000 
Tri 0.15 ± 0.05 0.20 ± 0.01 0.17 ± 0.01 0.14c 1.366 0.402 
Penta 0.96 ± 0.01a 10.98 ± 0.02a 2.61 ± 0.03a 4.56c 79,587.512 0.000 
Hepta 1.15 ± 0.03b 0.15 ± 0.02b 0.17 ± 0.01b 1.26c 1,410.033 0.000 
PCBRIVER A1RIVER 3RIVER H2O10 cm wellF-valueSig.
Di-PCB 8.09 ± 0.09a 20.69 ± 0.28a 10.59 ± 0.28a 16.57c 1,172.378 0.000 
Tri 0.15 ± 0.05 0.20 ± 0.01 0.17 ± 0.01 0.14c 1.366 0.402 
Penta 0.96 ± 0.01a 10.98 ± 0.02a 2.61 ± 0.03a 4.56c 79,587.512 0.000 
Hepta 1.15 ± 0.03b 0.15 ± 0.02b 0.17 ± 0.01b 1.26c 1,410.033 0.000 

aMean values with same superscript are not significantly different (p > 0.05).

bSignificantly different from other locations.

cNo replicates, hence no standard deviation.

The study provides solid evidence for the dispersion of PCBs with varying chlorine atom counts. Di-PCBs, which contain two chlorine atoms, exhibit large concentration differences among locations. River 3 (20.69 ± 0.28) has significantly higher di-PCB levels compared to River A1 (8.09 ± 0.09a), River H2O PCB (10.59 ± 0.28), and 10 cm well (16.57 ± aa). Tri-PCBs, which contain three chlorine atoms, had very stable quantities across all locations, with no statistically significant alterations seen. The mean results (0.15 ± 0.05, 0.20 ± 0.01, 0.17 ± 0.01, and 0.14) are comparable across River A1, River 3, River H2O PCB, and 10 cm well. Penta-PCBs, which contain five chlorine atoms, show remarkable variability. River 3 (10.98 ± 0.02a) had significantly higher penta-PCB levels than River A1 (0.96 ± 0.01a), River H2O PCB (2.61 ± 0.03a), and 10 cm well (4.56). Hepta-PCBs, which contain seven chlorine atoms, also differ dramatically among locations. River A1 (1.15 ± 0.03b) and 10 cm well (1.26 ± aa) had higher mean hepta-PCB concentrations compared to River 3 (0.15 ± 0.02b) and River H2O PCB (0.17 ± 0.01b). The ANOVA results demonstrate significant differences (F-statistic = 1,172.378, p < 0.001) among PCB groups in terms of chlorine atom count. Post-hoc studies can provide valuable information about the specific sites and PCB groupings generating these variations. The numbers demonstrate the difficulties of PCB distribution in different situations, emphasizing the importance of focused monitoring and management approaches to address potential environmental and health hazards associated with these persistent pollutants. PCB congeners in River 3 (Bomadi River) are largely di- and penta-chlorinated biphenyl, similar to the Niger Delta River (Iwegbue 2020). Also, 10 cm well samples show an increase in di- and penta-PCB. The increasing PCB burden in River 3 is due to pollution similar to that seen in the Udu River (Paschal et al. 2022). The degree of chlorination affects PCB metabolism in the human body. In general, less chlorinated PCBs metabolise faster than highly chlorinated ones (Lemieux 2019). The study's findings, which linked di-CBs to a higher proportion of PCB profiles, indicate that PCBs can remain in the environment despite pollution and impaired metabolism. PCB levels in surface water in Oyo and Delta are the result of runoff and long-term pollution from the garbage dump. In this environment, waste can only travel long distances, which may explain why some rivers have lower amounts of chlorinated PCBs. These compounds are also more likely to collect in the atmosphere and be delivered downward by precipitation (Gao et al. 2017).

The PCB concentrations recorded in this study (Forcados River, Lake Eleyele, Apete River, and Apete Wells) were compared with other studies conducted globally to contextualize the findings and identify potential patterns in contamination. Table 4 highlights the concentrations of PCB congeners across different water systems, reflecting varying levels of contamination influenced by industrial, agricultural, and urban activities.

Table 4

A comparison of the PCB concentration of this study with those reported in other countries

LocationRiver/LakeNo. of congenersConc. range (mg/L)References
Nigeria Lake Eleyele 17 10.38 ± 0.11a This study 
Nigeria Bomadi River 17 32.04 ± 0.35a This study 
Nigeria River Apete 17 13.61 ± 0.31a This study 
Nigeria Well 17 22.59 This study 
Nigeria Udu River 28 5.34–16.1 Paschal et al. (2022)  
Nigeria Port Harcourt 15 0.053–0.2733 Njoku et al. (2016)  
Egypt River Nile 10 14–20 Ayman et al. (2015)  
South Africa River Umgeni 6.91–252.30 Gakuba et al. (2015)  
USA River Missouri 29 11–250 Kathy et al. (2018)  
Canada St. Lawrence River 14 1.34–17.65 Suzie et al. (2019)  
France Ogre River 120–170 Khawla et al. (2012)  
Germany Izmit Bay 16 5.67–14.81 Leyla et al. (2012)  
Spain Ebro River 13 2.9–37 Alonso et al. (2011)  
LocationRiver/LakeNo. of congenersConc. range (mg/L)References
Nigeria Lake Eleyele 17 10.38 ± 0.11a This study 
Nigeria Bomadi River 17 32.04 ± 0.35a This study 
Nigeria River Apete 17 13.61 ± 0.31a This study 
Nigeria Well 17 22.59 This study 
Nigeria Udu River 28 5.34–16.1 Paschal et al. (2022)  
Nigeria Port Harcourt 15 0.053–0.2733 Njoku et al. (2016)  
Egypt River Nile 10 14–20 Ayman et al. (2015)  
South Africa River Umgeni 6.91–252.30 Gakuba et al. (2015)  
USA River Missouri 29 11–250 Kathy et al. (2018)  
Canada St. Lawrence River 14 1.34–17.65 Suzie et al. (2019)  
France Ogre River 120–170 Khawla et al. (2012)  
Germany Izmit Bay 16 5.67–14.81 Leyla et al. (2012)  
Spain Ebro River 13 2.9–37 Alonso et al. (2011)  

aIndicates no significant difference when appearing in two locations.

In this study, the Forcados River exhibited the highest PCB concentration (32.04 ± 0.35 mg/L) compared to Lake Eleyele (10.38 ± 0.11 mg/L), Apete River (13.61 ± 0.31 mg/L), and Apete Wells (22.59 mg/L). The elevated levels in the Forcados River are consistent with the river's exposure to industrial discharges, jetty boat emissions, and urban wastewater, all of which contribute to PCB contamination. This aligns with findings by Paschal et al. (2022) in the Udu River, Nigeria, where concentrations ranged from 5.34 to 16.1 mg/L, further emphasizing that rivers near industrial or urban centers tend to accumulate higher PCB levels.

In comparison, Lake Eleyele's PCB concentration, though moderate, reflects significant contamination from agricultural runoff and nearby urban wastewater. This is consistent with studies in Egypt's River Nile, where PCB levels ranged from 14 to 20 mg/L (Ayman et al. 2015). The PCB contamination in lakes is typically influenced by runoff from surrounding land uses, which can carry pesticides and industrial residues. Similarly, South Africa's Umgeni River recorded concentrations ranging from 6.91 to 252.30 mg/L (Gakuba et al. 2015), demonstrating how varying hydrological and land-use factors shape PCB pollution in African water systems.

Groundwater sources, such as Apete Wells, displayed lower PCB concentrations compared to surface water systems. However, the 22.59 mg/L detected in Apete Wells is concerning, as it suggests contamination from nearby waste disposal sites and abandoned ponds. This pattern mirrors findings from Port Harcourt, Nigeria, where PCB concentrations ranged from 0.053 to 0.2733 mg/L (Njoku et al. 2016). Groundwater systems are less directly exposed to surface pollutants but can still be contaminated through infiltration of leachates or poorly managed waste.

The PCB concentrations in Nigerian rivers and lakes are comparable to those reported in industrialized countries. For instance, River Missouri in the USA recorded PCB levels between 11 and 250 mg/L (Kathy et al. 2018), while France's Ogre River had concentrations ranging from 120 to 170 mg/L (Khawla et al. 2012). These results highlight the pervasive nature of PCB pollution globally, with contamination driven by similar sources, such as industrial discharge and improper waste management.

Interestingly, the concentrations in Izmit Bay, Germany (5.67–14.81 mg/L, Leyla et al. 2012), and the Ebro River, Spain (2.9–37 mg/L, Alonso et al. 2011), are closer to those observed in Nigerian rivers and lakes, suggesting comparable contamination risks in regions with mixed industrial and agricultural activities.

The findings from Table 4 emphasize the global scale of PCB contamination and its significant implications for environmental health. Rivers and lakes, as primary water sources, are highly vulnerable to pollutants due to their direct exposure to runoff, industrial discharge, and atmospheric deposition. The elevated PCB concentrations in Nigerian water systems pose serious risks to aquatic ecosystems and human health, as PCBs are known to bioaccumulate in fish and other aquatic organisms, entering the food chain and potentially causing adverse health effects, such as endocrine disruption and cancer (Van den Berg et al. 2006).

The correlation matrix presented in Table 5 highlights the relationships between different PCB congeners across the study locations. Understanding these relationships is critical as it provides insights into the sources of PCBs, their environmental behaviors, and interactions within the aquatic systems. Positive correlations between congeners often indicate shared sources or similar environmental transport mechanisms, while negative correlations suggest different sources or opposing environmental behaviors.

Table 5

Correlation matrix

PCB3PCB5PCB17PCB21PCB61PCB99PCB98PCB111PCB151PCB161PCB159PCB168PCB183PCB187PCB206
PCB3 −0.124 0.729 0.812 0.474 −0.074 −0.615 −0.552 −0.67 −0.547 −0.223 −0.092 −0.251 −0.932 −0.513 
PCB5 −0.124 −0.415 0.044 0.261 0.424 −0.283 −0.322 0.501 0.64 0.112 0.688 0.767 −0.143 0.426 
PCB17 0.729 −0.415 0.236 −0.249 0.103 −0.393 −0.322 −0.449 −0.503 −0.488 −0.602 −0.548 0.5 0.099 
PCB21 0.812 0.044 0.236 0.869 −0.202 −0.555 −0.546 −0.607 −0.398 0.038 0.244 0.052 0.954 0.639 
PCB61 0.474 0.261 −0.249 0.869 −0.246 −0.373 −0.382 −0.391 −0.151 0.27 0.582 0.326 0.706 0.603 
PCB99 −0.074 0.424 0.103 −0.202 −0.246 −0.683 −0.703 0.749 0.782 −0.79 −0.007 0.656 −0.157 0.588 
PCB98 −0.615 −0.283 −0.393 −0.555 −0.373 −0.683 0.989 −0.117 −0.28 0.699 −0.087 −0.484 −0.609 −0.941 
PCB111 −0.552 −0.322 −0.322 −0.546 −0.382 −0.703 0.989 −0.173 −0.337 0.668 −0.076 −0.536 −0.574 −0.947 
PCB151 −0.67 0.501 −0.449 −0.607 −0.391 0.749 −0.117 −0.173 0.965 −0.318 0.203 0.728 −0.681 0.156 
PCB161 −0.547 0.64 −0.503 −0.398 −0.151 0.782 −0.28 −0.337 0.965 −0.324 0.381 0.881 −0.513 0.37 
PCB159 −0.223 0.112 −0.488 0.038 0.27 −0.79 0.699 0.668 −0.318 −0.324 0.317 −0.214 −0.131 −0.495 
PCB168 −0.092 0.668 −0.602 0.224 0.582 −0.007 −0.087 −0.076 0.203 0.381 0.317 0.659 0.023 0.354 
PCB183 −0.251 0.767 −0.548 0.052 0.326 0.656 −0.484 −0.536 0.728 0.881 −0.214 0.659 −0.129 0.666 
PCB187 −0.932 −0.143 0.5 0.954 0.706 −0.157 −0.609 −0.574 −0.681 −0.513 −0.131 0.023 −0.129 0.599 
PCB206 −0.513 0.426 0.099 0.639 0.603 0.588 −0.941 −0.947 0.156 0.37 −0.495 0.354 0.666 0.599 
PCB3PCB5PCB17PCB21PCB61PCB99PCB98PCB111PCB151PCB161PCB159PCB168PCB183PCB187PCB206
PCB3 −0.124 0.729 0.812 0.474 −0.074 −0.615 −0.552 −0.67 −0.547 −0.223 −0.092 −0.251 −0.932 −0.513 
PCB5 −0.124 −0.415 0.044 0.261 0.424 −0.283 −0.322 0.501 0.64 0.112 0.688 0.767 −0.143 0.426 
PCB17 0.729 −0.415 0.236 −0.249 0.103 −0.393 −0.322 −0.449 −0.503 −0.488 −0.602 −0.548 0.5 0.099 
PCB21 0.812 0.044 0.236 0.869 −0.202 −0.555 −0.546 −0.607 −0.398 0.038 0.244 0.052 0.954 0.639 
PCB61 0.474 0.261 −0.249 0.869 −0.246 −0.373 −0.382 −0.391 −0.151 0.27 0.582 0.326 0.706 0.603 
PCB99 −0.074 0.424 0.103 −0.202 −0.246 −0.683 −0.703 0.749 0.782 −0.79 −0.007 0.656 −0.157 0.588 
PCB98 −0.615 −0.283 −0.393 −0.555 −0.373 −0.683 0.989 −0.117 −0.28 0.699 −0.087 −0.484 −0.609 −0.941 
PCB111 −0.552 −0.322 −0.322 −0.546 −0.382 −0.703 0.989 −0.173 −0.337 0.668 −0.076 −0.536 −0.574 −0.947 
PCB151 −0.67 0.501 −0.449 −0.607 −0.391 0.749 −0.117 −0.173 0.965 −0.318 0.203 0.728 −0.681 0.156 
PCB161 −0.547 0.64 −0.503 −0.398 −0.151 0.782 −0.28 −0.337 0.965 −0.324 0.381 0.881 −0.513 0.37 
PCB159 −0.223 0.112 −0.488 0.038 0.27 −0.79 0.699 0.668 −0.318 −0.324 0.317 −0.214 −0.131 −0.495 
PCB168 −0.092 0.668 −0.602 0.224 0.582 −0.007 −0.087 −0.076 0.203 0.381 0.317 0.659 0.023 0.354 
PCB183 −0.251 0.767 −0.548 0.052 0.326 0.656 −0.484 −0.536 0.728 0.881 −0.214 0.659 −0.129 0.666 
PCB187 −0.932 −0.143 0.5 0.954 0.706 −0.157 −0.609 −0.574 −0.681 −0.513 −0.131 0.023 −0.129 0.599 
PCB206 −0.513 0.426 0.099 0.639 0.603 0.588 −0.941 −0.947 0.156 0.37 −0.495 0.354 0.666 0.599 

The analysis revealed both strong positive and negative correlations between PCB congeners, reflecting the complexity of their distribution and interactions.

  • 1. Positive correlations:

  • PCB congeners such as PCB3 and PCB21 displayed a strong positive correlation (r = 0.812, p < 0.001), indicating a likely shared source, such as industrial emissions or wastewater runoff. This pattern aligns with findings from similar studies, where closely related PCB congeners were shown to originate from specific industrial processes, such as the use of electrical transformers and capacitors (Van den Berg et al. 2006).

Another notable positive correlation was observed between PCB151 and PCB161 (r = 0.965, p < 0.001). This strong relationship suggests that these congeners may have been introduced into the environment through a common pathway, such as agricultural runoff carrying PCB residues from pesticides. Such correlations are critical for identifying pollution sources and prioritizing mitigation strategies.

  • 2. Negative correlations

  • Conversely, strong negative correlations were observed, such as between PCB98 and PCB111 (r = −0.947, p < 0.001). These negative correlations may reflect differences in the sources of these congeners or variations in their environmental transport and degradation. For instance, PCB congeners with higher chlorine content, like PCB111, are more hydrophobic and tend to adsorb onto sediments, whereas less chlorinated congeners, such as PCB98, may remain in the water column (Zhao et al. 2019). This distinction highlights how environmental conditions, such as sediment composition and hydrology, influence PCB behavior.

  • 3. Complex interactions

  • Certain congeners, such as PCB183, exhibited moderate positive correlations with multiple other congeners, including PCB168 (r = 0.659, p < 0.001) and PCB206 (r = 0.666, p < 0.001). This suggests overlapping but not identical sources, potentially combining industrial runoff with atmospheric deposition. The moderate correlations may also reflect environmental processes, such as partial degradation or differential transport of PCB congeners in aquatic systems.

Environmental and ecological implications

The observed correlations have significant implications for environmental health and risk management. Strong positive correlations, like those between PCB3 and PCB21, indicate a need to identify and mitigate specific point sources of pollution, such as factories or urban wastewater systems. On the other hand, negative correlations, such as between PCB98 and PCB111, suggest complex environmental behaviors that require further investigation, particularly in sediment-water interactions.

These findings also point to the potential for bioaccumulation and biomagnification in aquatic ecosystems. Congeners with strong positive correlations are more likely to co-occur in fish and other organisms, leading to cumulative exposure risks for both wildlife and humans. Studies have shown that certain PCB congeners are highly toxic and can cause endocrine disruption, immune suppression, and cancer in humans (Reddy et al. 2019). Addressing these risks requires a holistic approach, including source control, monitoring, and public awareness.

Table 6 highlights the commonalities of PCB congeners before and after extraction using principal component analysis (PCA). Communalities measure how much of the variance in each variable (PCB congener) is explained by the extracted components. The extraction values show the proportion of variance retained in each variable after dimensionality reduction, which is critical for understanding how well the PCA captures the essential information from the dataset (Gorshkov et al. 2017; Zhao et al. 2019).

Table 6

Communalities

PCBInitialExtraction
PCB3 1.000 0.939 
PCB5 1.000 0.703 
PCB17 1.000 0.884 
PCB21 1.000 0.977 
PCB61 1.000 0.95 
PCB99 1.000 0.996 
PCB98 1.000 0.999 
PCB111 1.000 0.984 
PCB151 1.000 0.982 
PCB161 1.000 0.992 
PCB159 1.000 0.887 
PCB168 1.000 0.827 
PCB183 1.000 0.992 
PCB187 1.000 0.995 
PCB206 1.000 0.986 
PCBInitialExtraction
PCB3 1.000 0.939 
PCB5 1.000 0.703 
PCB17 1.000 0.884 
PCB21 1.000 0.977 
PCB61 1.000 0.95 
PCB99 1.000 0.996 
PCB98 1.000 0.999 
PCB111 1.000 0.984 
PCB151 1.000 0.982 
PCB161 1.000 0.992 
PCB159 1.000 0.887 
PCB168 1.000 0.827 
PCB183 1.000 0.992 
PCB187 1.000 0.995 
PCB206 1.000 0.986 

Note. Extraction method: Principal component analysis.

The initial communalities for all PCB congeners were set at 1.000, indicating that 100% of the variance in each variable was initially retained. After PCA extraction, the commonalities decreased for most congeners, reflecting that only a portion of the original variance was explained by the principal components. For example, PCB5 showed a reduced commonality of 0.703, indicating that 70.3% of its variance was retained after extraction, while the remaining 29.7% was likely explained by other, less significant components.

Interestingly, some congeners retained nearly all of their variance post-extraction. PCB98 and PCB99 displayed unusually high communalities of 0.999 and 0.996, respectively, suggesting that these variables are highly relevant to the principal components and contribute significantly to the overall variance in the dataset. Similar findings have been reported in studies on PCB distributions in aquatic environments, where specific congeners demonstrated higher significance due to their persistence and environmental mobility (Moraleda-Cibrián et al. 2015; Gao et al. 2018). This finding indicates that PCB98 and PCB99 are pivotal in explaining the patterns in PCB distribution and may serve as key indicators of contamination sources or environmental processes.

The variation in communalities highlights the differential importance of PCB congeners in contributing to the overall structure of the dataset. Congeners with higher post-extraction commonalities, such as PCB111 (0.984) and PCB161 (0.992), are likely more strongly influenced by shared environmental sources or processes (Gao et al. 2017). Conversely, congeners with lower communalities, such as PCB159 (0.887) and PCB168 (0.827), may exhibit unique environmental behaviors or originate from distinct sources. These results are consistent with prior research emphasizing the role of environmental and physicochemical properties in shaping PCB distribution (Vorkamp 2018; Paschal et al. 2022).

The results suggest that PCA effectively identifies the most significant PCB congeners, enabling dimensionality reduction while retaining meaningful variance. This reinforces PCA's utility as a tool for simplifying complex datasets and focusing on key variables (Zhao et al. 2019).

Table 7 summarizes the total variance explained by each principal component extracted through PCA. This table is vital for understanding how much of the dataset's variability is retained by the principal components, helping to identify the most significant dimensions that capture the essence of the data (Gorshkov et al. 2017; Zhao et al. 2019).

Table 7

Total variance explained

ComponentInitial eigenvalueExtraction sums of squared loadingsRotation sums of squared loadings
Total% VarianceCumulative %
5.773 38.484 38.484 
5.280 35.201 73.685 
3.038 20.255 93.941 
0.547 3.648 97.589 
0.259 1.723 99.312 
0.079 0.525 99.837 
0.024 0.163 100.000 
2.529 1.686 100.000 
7.308 4.872 100.000 
10 5.913 3.942 100.000 
11 2.157 1.428 100.000 
12 2.588 1.725 100.000 
13 −1.527 −1.018 100.000 
14 −2.879 −1.919 100.000 
15 −6.115 −4.077 100.000 
ComponentInitial eigenvalueExtraction sums of squared loadingsRotation sums of squared loadings
Total% VarianceCumulative %
5.773 38.484 38.484 
5.280 35.201 73.685 
3.038 20.255 93.941 
0.547 3.648 97.589 
0.259 1.723 99.312 
0.079 0.525 99.837 
0.024 0.163 100.000 
2.529 1.686 100.000 
7.308 4.872 100.000 
10 5.913 3.942 100.000 
11 2.157 1.428 100.000 
12 2.588 1.725 100.000 
13 −1.527 −1.018 100.000 
14 −2.879 −1.919 100.000 
15 −6.115 −4.077 100.000 

Note. Extraction method: Principal component analysis.

The first principal component explains 38.484% of the total variance, and the second component contributes an additional 35.201%, bringing the cumulative variance explained by the first two components to 73.685%. These two components effectively summarize the majority of the dataset's variability, capturing the key patterns in PCB distribution.

The third component accounts for another 20.255% of the variance, resulting in a cumulative variance of 93.941% explained by the top three components. This high percentage underscores the efficiency of PCA in reducing the dataset's dimensionality while retaining nearly all of its original variability. Similar trends have been observed in environmental studies, where the first few components often capture the majority of the variance due to dominant contamination patterns (Moraleda-Cibrián et al. 2015; Gao et al. 2018). The remaining components (4 through 15) contribute minimal variance, with eigenvalues close to or below zero, making them statistically insignificant and less relevant for further analysis.

The dominance of the first three components suggests that PCB contamination patterns in the study are primarily influenced by a few key factors, such as shared pollution sources or environmental behaviors of specific congeners. For instance, industrial discharge, urban runoff, and sediment transport dynamics are likely the primary drivers of variability in PCB distribution, while other minor factors play less significant roles (Vorkamp 2018; Paschal et al. 2022).

The cumulative variance explained by the top three components highlights PCA's utility as a data-reduction tool. This allows researchers to focus on the most significant dimensions of PCB contamination, simplifying complex datasets into actionable insights. Such dimensionality reduction is particularly valuable in environmental studies where datasets often contain numerous variables with overlapping or redundant information.

The high percentage of variance explained by the first three components enables researchers to prioritize the most critical patterns in PCB distribution, aiding in the identification of contamination sources and the development of targeted remediation strategies. By isolating the dominant factors influencing PCB variability, policymakers and environmental managers can implement more effective interventions to reduce contamination and mitigate associated risks to human and ecological health. For example, targeting industrial discharge and improving wastewater management could significantly reduce PCB levels in aquatic systems (Gao et al. 2017; Zhao et al. 2019).

The component matrix in Table 8 shows the three components recovered by PCA, as well as the loadings of each variable (PCB3, PCB5, PCB17, PCB21, PCB61, PCB99, PCB98, PCB111, PCB151, PCB161, PCB159, PCB168, PCB183, PCB187, and PCB206). PCB21 (0.619), PCB99 (0.627), PCB98 (−0.962), PCB111 (−0.964), PCB168 (0.330), PCB183 (0.646), PCB187 (0.593), and PCB206 (0.991) have considerable positive loadings in Component 1. This indicates a close link between Component 1 and these variables. High positive loadings for PCB151 (0.960) and PCB161 (0.925) in Component 2 suggested a strong relationship between these variables. Component 3 is distinguished by strong positive loadings for PCB159 (0.765) and PCB168 (0.782), as well as lower loadings for certain variables. These loadings help us understand the variables that influence each component in unique ways. Component 1, for example, appears to be associated with multiple variables, including PCB21, PCB99, PCB98, and others. Component 2 is primarily controlled by PCB151 and PCB161, however, PCB159 and PCB168 have an impact on Component 3. In general, this component matrix helps to expose the data's main structure as well as the relationships between the original variables and the derived PCA components.

Table 8

Component matrixa

PCBComponent 1Component 2Component 3
PCB 3 0.542 − 0.799 − 0.080 
PCB 5 0.460 0.557 0.425 
PCB 17 0.171 − 0.627 − 0.679 
PCB 21 0.619 − 0.669 0.382 
PCB 61 0.545 − 0.358 0.724 
PCB 99 0.627 0.581 − 0.515 
PCB 98 − 0.962 0.089 0.255 
PCB 111 − 0.964 0.033 0.230 
PCB 151 0.160 0.960 − 0.188 
PCB 161 0.367 0.925 − 0.037 
PCB 159 − 0537 − 0.116 0.765 
PCB 168 0.330 0.328 0.782 
PCB 183 0.646 0.700 0.291 
PCB 187 0.593 − 0.792 0.125 
PCB 206 0.991 0.001 0.057 
PCBComponent 1Component 2Component 3
PCB 3 0.542 − 0.799 − 0.080 
PCB 5 0.460 0.557 0.425 
PCB 17 0.171 − 0.627 − 0.679 
PCB 21 0.619 − 0.669 0.382 
PCB 61 0.545 − 0.358 0.724 
PCB 99 0.627 0.581 − 0.515 
PCB 98 − 0.962 0.089 0.255 
PCB 111 − 0.964 0.033 0.230 
PCB 151 0.160 0.960 − 0.188 
PCB 161 0.367 0.925 − 0.037 
PCB 159 − 0537 − 0.116 0.765 
PCB 168 0.330 0.328 0.782 
PCB 183 0.646 0.700 0.291 
PCB 187 0.593 − 0.792 0.125 
PCB 206 0.991 0.001 0.057 

Note. Extraction method: Principal component analysis.

aThree components extracted.

The three components were found using PCA with Varimax rotation and Kaiser Normalization. Table 9's rotational component matrix displays the loadings of each variable (PCB3, PCB5, PCB17, PCB21, PCB61, PCB99, PCB98, PCB111, PCB151, PCB161, PCB159, PCB168, PCB183, PCB187, and PCB 206) on the three components. Component 1 is distinguished by strong positive loadings of PCB3 (0.869), PCB21 (0.981), PCB61 (0.831), PCB187 (0.966), and other variables. This component reflects a set of chemically linked components. Component 2 contains a high positive loading of PCB99 (0.935), PCB161 (0.547), PCB151 (0.485), PCB183 (0.510), and other compounds. This component reflects the variance of these variables. PCB168 (0.876), PCB17 (−0.806), and PCB183 (0.852) all have high positive loadings in component 3. These components have a significant impact on component 3. The varimax rotation improves component readability by raising the variance of the loadings within each component while limiting component overlap. This rotation strategy facilitates in the detection of significant patterns in data. To summarize, the rotated component matrix gives a better understanding of how each variable affects the components obtained after rotation. Three components – Component 1, Component 2, and Component 3 − appear to be linked to distinct PCB chemicals, variations in other compounds, and different sets of factors. This rotated component matrix can assist in clarifying and comprehending the data's underlying structure.

Table 9

Rotated component matrixa

PCBComponent 1Component 2Component 3
PCB 3 0.869 0.252 − 0.347 
PCB 5 − 0.018 0.251 0.800 
PCB 17 0.319 0.363 − 0.806 
PCB 21 0.981 0.076 0.092 
PCB 61 0.831 − 0.099 0.499 
PCB 99 − 0.292 0.935 0.191 
PCB 98 − 0.492 − 0.864 − 0.095 
PCB 111 − 0.460 − 0.866 − 0.148 
PCB 151 − 0.710 0.485 0.492 
PCB 161 − 0.517 0.547 0.653 
PCB 159 0.079 − 0.890 0.298 
PCB 168 0.217 − 0.117 0.876 
PCB 183 − 0.076 0.510 0.852 
PCB 187 0.966 0.174 − 0.176 
PCB 206 0.555 0.728 0.386 
PCBComponent 1Component 2Component 3
PCB 3 0.869 0.252 − 0.347 
PCB 5 − 0.018 0.251 0.800 
PCB 17 0.319 0.363 − 0.806 
PCB 21 0.981 0.076 0.092 
PCB 61 0.831 − 0.099 0.499 
PCB 99 − 0.292 0.935 0.191 
PCB 98 − 0.492 − 0.864 − 0.095 
PCB 111 − 0.460 − 0.866 − 0.148 
PCB 151 − 0.710 0.485 0.492 
PCB 161 − 0.517 0.547 0.653 
PCB 159 0.079 − 0.890 0.298 
PCB 168 0.217 − 0.117 0.876 
PCB 183 − 0.076 0.510 0.852 
PCB 187 0.966 0.174 − 0.176 
PCB 206 0.555 0.728 0.386 

Note. Extraction method: Principal component analysis.

Rotation method: Varimax with Kaiser Normalization.

aRotation converged in six iterations.

The contributions of individual PCB congeners varied significantly across the study locations, reflecting the influence of local environmental conditions and pollution sources (Figure 2).

Dominance of higher chlorinated PCBs

Across all three locations, higher chlorinated congeners (e.g., penta-, hexa-, and hepta-PCBs) exhibited the highest percentage contributions. For instance, hexa-PCBs accounted for 45% of the total PCB load in the Forcados River, indicating their dominance. This trend aligns with findings from previous studies, which highlight the persistence and bioaccumulation potential of higher chlorinated congeners in aquatic systems due to their hydrophobicity and resistance to degradation (Van den Berg et al. 2006; Gao et al. 2018). These congeners are more likely to adhere to sediments and biota, leading to long-term environmental persistence.

Variations between locations

  • Forcados River: The dominance of hexa-PCBs and hepta-PCBs in this location underscores the significant influence of industrial emissions and oil-related pollution. These congeners are often associated with petroleum-derived products and are likely introduced through activities such as oil spills, industrial discharges, and jetty operations. The proximity of the river to industrial hubs supports this observation (Zhao et al. 2019; Paschal et al. 2022).

  • Lake Eleyele: While hexa-PCBs also contributed significantly (40%) in Lake Eleyele, there was a noticeable presence of lower chlorinated congeners, such as tri- and tetra-PCBs (25% combined). This distribution reflects the influence of agricultural runoff and urban wastewater, which often carry less chlorinated PCBs that are more water-soluble and prone to transport in surface water systems (Vorkamp 2018).

  • Apete Wells: The PCB contributions in the wells showed a more even distribution, with penta-PCBs contributing 35% and tetra-PCBs contributing 25%. This broader profile likely results from mixed contamination sources, including leachates from waste disposal sites, abandoned ponds, and possible infiltration of surface pollutants. Groundwater systems may act as reservoirs for water-soluble congeners, allowing for their gradual accumulation (Gorshkov et al. 2017; Unyimadu et al. 2018).

Environmental implications

The predominance of higher chlorinated PCBs in surface water systems (rivers and lakes) presents a significant risk of long-term contamination. These congeners are less biodegradable, tend to accumulate in sediments, and are more likely to enter the food chain, posing risks to aquatic ecosystems and human health (Van den Berg et al. 2006; Gao et al. 2018). In contrast, the presence of lower chlorinated congeners in groundwater systems (wells) highlights the potential for contamination through infiltration and transport of water-soluble compounds. This underscores the vulnerability of groundwater resources to surface activities.

These findings emphasize the need for targeted interventions based on the contamination profiles of each location:

  • For the Forcados River, addressing industrial discharges and oil spills is critical to reducing hexa-PCB levels and mitigating long-term risks.

  • For Lake Eleyele, improving wastewater treatment and controlling agricultural runoff can help limit the transport of less chlorinated PCBs.

  • For Apete Wells, enhancing waste management practices and monitoring potential leachate sources, such as nearby waste disposal sites, is essential to prevent further contamination.

This study highlights the distribution, composition, and health risks of PCBs in surface and groundwater across three locations: Forcados River (River 3), Lake Eleyele, and Apete Wells. The findings provide critical insights into the extent of PCB contamination in these water systems and its implications for environmental health.

The Forcados River (River 3) recorded the highest PCB concentrations among the study locations (32.04 ± 0.35 mg/L), likely due to its direct connection to the Niger River, a major waterway known for its exposure to industrial and agricultural pollutants. River 3 serves as a tributary to the Niger, and the confluence point is characterized by activities such as oil exploration, jetty operations, and wastewater discharge. These activities contribute significantly to the PCB burden, as supported by previous studies documenting elevated PCB levels in parts of the Niger River basin (Eze et al. 2023). This emphasizes the importance of monitoring major waterways and implementing targeted pollution control strategies to protect downstream ecosystems and communities.

Lake Eleyele exhibited moderate PCB concentrations (10.38 ± 0.11 mg/L), reflecting contamination primarily from agricultural runoff and urban wastewater. The lake's proximity to densely populated areas and agricultural activities increases its vulnerability to pollution. The diverse sources of contamination highlight the need for integrated management practices to safeguard this vital water resource.

In contrast, Apete Wells recorded the lowest PCB concentrations (22.59 mg/L), with some PCB homologs falling BDLs. This relatively lower contamination can be attributed to the natural filtration properties of the soil, which reduce the mobility of hydrophobic PCBs. However, the presence of detectable PCB levels suggests infiltration from nearby waste disposal sites and abandoned ponds, underscoring the need for better waste management practices to protect groundwater quality.

The health risk assessment further revealed that the PCB concentrations in all water systems exceed international standards, posing significant risks to human health. Chronic exposure to PCBs, particularly through the consumption of contaminated water, may lead to endocrine disruption, immunotoxicity, and increased cancer risks. The risks are highest for communities reliant on the Forcados River and Lake Eleyele, where the dominance of higher chlorinated PCBs exacerbates the potential for bioaccumulation and biomagnification in the food chain.

This study underscores the urgent need for comprehensive surveillance and mitigation efforts to address PCB contamination in Nigeria's water systems. For the Forcados River, reducing industrial and oil-related discharges is critical. Lake Eleyele requires better agricultural runoff control, while Apete Wells necessitates improvements in waste disposal practices. These measures, coupled with public health awareness campaigns and stricter enforcement of environmental regulations, will help reduce PCB exposure and protect both ecosystems and human health.

The total level of PCBs identified in well and river samples from the states of Delta and Oyo exceeded the EPA's water quality standard of 0.0005 ppm. The findings call for a detailed examination of surface water and the migration of contaminants into these rivers in order to establish the likelihood that PCBs would enter through leaks and runoff. However, ongoing bio-monitoring of PCB's effects on local ecosystems is essential.

We thank the university management for providing the enabled environment for carrying the research.

We give our consent to publish the manuscript

All relevant data are included in the paper or its Supplementary Information.

The authors declare there is no conflict.

Alonso
C.
,
Fernandez
M. A.
,
Gonzalez
M. J.
&
Hernandez
L. M.
(
2011
)
Occurrence of organochlorine insecticides, PCBs and PCB congeners in water sediments of the Ebro River (Spain)
.
Chemosphere
,
38
(1)
,
33
43
.
Ayman
M. M.
,
Hesham
D.
,
Mahdy
A. A.
,
Amr
M. M.
,
Mariam
H. E.
,
Ehab
N.
&
Hend
A. M.
(
2015
)
Polychlorinated biphenyls water pollution along the River Nile, Egypt
,
Egypt. J. Aquat. Res.
,
41
(
2
),
123
130
.
Batang
Z. B.
,
Alikunhi
N.
,
Gochfied
M.
,
Burger
J.
,
Al-Jahdali
R.
,
Al-Jahdali
H.
,
Aziz
M. A. M.
,
Al-Jebreen
D.
&
Al-Suwailem
A.
(
2016
)
Congener specific levels and patterns of polychlorinated biphenyls in edible tissue from central Red Sea coast of Saudi Arabia
,
Sci. Total Environ.
,
572
,
915
925
.
CCME
(
2007
)
Canada Water Quality Guidelines for the Protection of Environmental and Human Health
, 6th edn.
Winnipeg, Canada
:
Canada council of ministers of environment
.
Ediagbonya
T. F.
,
Tobin
A. E.
,
Ehidiamen
G.
,
Asogun
D. A.
&
Uwidia
I. E.
(
2015
)
Heterotrophic bacteria and some selected heavy metals in rainwater harvesting system in Usugbenu, Edo State
,
Biol. Environ. Sci. J. Trop.
,
12
(
2
),
795
801
.
Ediagbonya
T. F.
,
Oyinlusi
O. C.
,
Okungbowa
E. G.
&
Uche
I. J.
(
2022
)
Environmental and Human Health risk assessments of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in particulate matter in okitipupa, Ondo State, Nigeria
,
Environ. Monit. Assess.
,
194
(
9
),
556
.
Ediagbonya
T. F.
,
Uche
I. J.
&
Aniekwe
C.
(
2023a
)
Polychlorited biphenyls (PCBs) in soil in Ondo State, Nigeria
,
Int. J. Appl. Sci. Eng. Rev.
,
4
(
4
),
41
59
.
Ediagbonya
T. F.
,
Uche
I. J.
,
Esi
O. E.
&
Afolabi
O. J.
(
2023b
)
Determination of polychlorited biphenyls (PCBs) in surface water in Ondo State
,
Coast J. School Sci
,
5
(
1
),
580
863
.
Ediagbonya
T. F.
,
Uche
I. J.
,
Esi
O. E.
&
Akinrefon
D. O.
(
2023c
)
Evaluation of polychlorited biphenyls (PCBs) in sedimentfrom surface water of Igodan,Okunmo,Lebbi,Idepe and Oaustechin in Okitipupa in Ondo State
,
J. Appl. Sci. Environ. Manage.
,
27
(
9
),
2041
2050
.
Eze
C. U.
,
Okoye
E. O.
&
Oranekwu
C. A.
(
2023
)
Assessment of heavy metal contamination in sediments of the lower Niger River
,
Environ. Monit. Assess.
,
195
(
3
),
1
15
.
Gorshkov
A. G.
,
Kustova
O. V.
,
Dzyuba
E. V.
,
Zakharova
Y. R.
,
Shishlyannikov
S. M.
&
Khutoryanskiy
V. A.
(
2017
)
Polychlorinated biphenyls in Lake Baikal ecosystem
,
Chem. Sustainable Dev.
,
25
,
269
278
.
Haddaoui
I.
,
Robins
T.
&
Chetty
S.
(
2021
)
Occurrence and distribution of PAHs, PCBs, and chlorinated pesticides in Tunisian soil irrigated with treated wastewater
,
Chemosphere
,
90
,
1298
1311
.
Halfadji
A.
,
Touabet
A.
&
Badjah-Hadj-Ahmed
A. Y.
(
2022
)
Comparison of soxhlet extraction, microwave-assisted extraction and ultrasonication extraction for the determination of PCBs congeners in spiked soils by transformer oil (Askarel)
,
Int. J. Adv. Eng. Technol.
,
5
(
2
),
63
75
.
Igwe
P. U.
,
Chukwudi
F. C.
,
Ifenatuorah
I. F.
,
Fagbeja
C. A.
&
Okeke
C. C.
(
2018
)
A review of environmental effects of surface water pollution
,
Int. J. Adv. Eng. Res. Sci.
,
4
,
128
137
.
Imevbore
A. A. H.
(
2019
)
The limnology of Lake Eleyele, Ibadan, Nigeria, Hydrobiologia, 30 (1), 134–176
.
Kathy
R. E.
,
William
G. B.
,
Carl
E. O.
,
Thomas
W. M.
,
Barry
C. P.
&
Paul
H. P.
(
2018
)
Distribution of pesticides, PAHs, PCBs, and bioavailable metals in depositional sediments of the lower Missouri River, USA
,
Arch. Environ. Contam. Toxicol.
,
55
,
161
172
.
Khawla
T.
,
Marie-Jeanne
T.
,
Martine
B.
,
Marc
C.
,
Fabrice
A.
&
Pierre
L.
(
2012
)
Occurrence of polychlorinated biphenyls, and phthalates in freshwater fish from the Ogre River
,
Ile-de France. Environ.
,
63
,
101
113
.
Klaren
G. S.
,
Gadupudi
B.
,
Wels
D. L.
,
Simmons
A. K.
,
Olivier
L. W.
&
Robertson
W. D.
(
2019
)
Progression of micronutrient alteration and hepatotoxicity following acute PCB126 exposure
,
Toxicology
,
338
,
1
7
.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tox.2019.09.004
.
Lauby-Secretan
B.
,
Batterman
S.
&
Hayes
J.
(
2018
)
Carcinogenicity of polychlorinated biphenyls and polybrominated biphenyls lancet oncol
,
Lancet Oncol.
,
249
,
28
41
.
https://doi.org/10.1026/j.toxlet. 2018.03. 002
.
Lemieux
P. M.
(
2019
)
Evaluation of Emissions From the Open Burning of Household Waste in Barrels. Vol. 1. Technical Report
.
EPA-600/R-97-134a
.
Washington, DC
:
US Environmental Protection Agency
.
Leyla
T.
,
Fatma
T.
,
Bernhard
H.
,
Christian
K.
,
Oya
O.
&
Karl-Werner
S.
(
2012
)
Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon (PAHs) and polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) distributions in the Bay of Marmara sea: izmit Bay
,
Germany Environ. Pollution
,
119
(
3
),
383
397
.
Net
S.
,
Henry
F.
,
Rabodonirina
S.
,
Diop
M.
,
Merhaby
D.
,
Mahfouz
C.
&
Amara
R.
(
2015
)
Accumulation of PAHs, Me-PAHs, PCBs and total mercury in sediments and marine species in coastal areas of Dakar, Senegal: contamination level and impact
,
Inter. J. Environ. Res.
,
9
,
419
432
.
Njoku
P. C.
,
Eziukwu
C. C.
&
Madu
A. N.
(
2016
)
Polychlorinared biphenyls contamination of soils and rivers
,
Port Harcourt. Environ. Pollut.
,
6
(
1
),
39
42
.
Oksanen
J.
,
Blanchet
G. F.
,
Friendly
M.
,
Kindt
R.
,
Legendre
P.
,
McGlinn
D.
,
Minchin
P. R.
,
O'Hara
R. B.
,
Simpson
G. L.
&
Solymos
P.
(
2019
)
Vegan: Community Ecology Package. R Package Version 2.5-6
.
Available at: https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=vegan (Accessed: 24 June 2020)
.
Paschal
O. I.
,
Enyohwo
D. K.
&
Ambrose
G. F.
(
2022
)
Polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) in water and sediments from the Udu River, Niger Delta, Nigeria
,
J. Environ. Assess.
,
1
,
20
.
Rudel
R. A.
,
Seryak
L. M.
&
Brody
J. G.
(
2008
)
PCB- containing wood floor finish is a likely source of elevated PCBs in residents blood, water, household air and dust: a case study of exposure
,
Environ. Health
,
7
(
2
),
10
.
SERAS
(
2006
)
Standard Operating Procedures for Environmental Sample Analysis
.
Lagos
:
Department of Environmental Sciences, University of Lagos
.
Suzie
P.
,
Charles
B.
,
Serge
M.
&
Thanh-Thao
P.
(
2019
)
Composition of PCBs and PAHs in the Montreal urban community wastewater and in surface water of St. Lawrence River. Canada
,
Water Air Soil Pollut.
,
111
,
251
270
.
UNEP
(
2018
)
Inventory of Worldwide PCB Destruction Capacity. Prepared by UNEP Chemicals in Co-operation with the Secretariat of the Basel Convention (SBC) United Nations Environment Programme. First Issue. 78 p
.
Unyimadu
J. P.
,
Osinbajo
O.
&
Babayemi
J. O.
(
2018
)
Polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) in River Niger, Nigeria: occurrence, distribution and composition profiles
,
Toxicology and Industrial Health
,
34
(
7
),
453
463
.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. (EPA)
(
2019
)
PCBs: Cancer Dose-Response Assessment and Application to Environmental Mixtures
.
Washington, DC
:
US Environmental Protection Agency, National Center for Environmental Assessment, Office of Research and Development EPA/600/p-96/001F
.
Van den Berg
M.
,
Birnbaum
L. S.
,
Denison
M.
,
De Vito
M.
,
Farland
W.
,
Feeley
M.
,
Fiedler
H.
,
Hakansson
H.
,
Hanberg
A.
,
Haws
L.
,
Rose
M.
,
Safe
S.
,
Schrenk
D.
,
Tohyama
C.
,
Tritscher
A.
,
Tuomisto
J.
,
Tysklind
M.
,
Walker
N.
&
Peterson
R. E.
(
2006
)
The 2005 World Health Organization reevaluation of human and mammalian toxic equivalency factors for dioxins and dioxin-like compounds
,
Toxicol. Sci.
,
93
(
2
),
223
241
.
VROM
(
1994
)
Environmental Quality Objectives for Water: Ecological Investigation Levels. The Hague: Ministry of Housing, Spatial Planning and the Environment
.
Wang
L. W.
,
Robertson
G.
&
Carson
J.
(
2018
)
Polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) as initiating agents in hepatocellular carcinoma
,
Cancer Lett.
,
334
(
1
),
46
55
.
https://doi.org/10. 1016/j.canlet.2018.11.041
.
Wimmerová
S.
,
Chernyak
S.
&
Gouden
Y.
(
2020
)
Half lives of serum PCB congener concentrations in environmentally exposed early adolescents
,
Chemosphere
,
110
,
2611
2618
.
Zhang
L. M.
,
Qiu
J.
,
He
Y.
,
Liao
Y. M.
&
Luo
J. Y.
(
2022
)
Occurrence and congeners specific of polychlorinated biphenyls in agricultural soils from southern Jiangsu, China
,
J. Environ. Sci.
,
19
,
342
388
.
Zhao
H. X.
,
Adamcakova-Dodd
A.
,
Hu
D.
,
Hornbuckle
K. C.
,
Just
C. L.
,
Robertson
L. W.
,
Thorne
P. S.
&
Lehmler
H.-J.
(
2019
)
Development of a synthetic PCB mixture resembling the average polychlorinated biphenyl profile in Chicago air
,
Environ. Int.
,
36
,
819
827
.
doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2019.03.003
.
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Licence (CC BY 4.0), which permits copying, adaptation and redistribution, provided the original work is properly cited (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).