Abstract
It is generally accepted that some trace organic contaminants (TrOCs) pass through the wastewater treatment process without being properly treated and find their way into waterbodies. These molecules can also be concentrated within the biosolids (BS) through adsorption. The presence of TrOCs in BS, which are then commonly used as soil amendments in agriculture, may affect plant growth and viability. The potential risks posed by TrOCs are usually ignored because they are present in low concentrations and mostly have relatively short half-lives. However, the continuous addition of these substances in water sources and on farmlands makes them pseudo-persistent. To reduce the concentrations of selected TrOCs from these BS, Pseudomonas yamanorum LBUM636 (PY) was tested with and without a commercial bacterial blend of Bacillus spp. (BC). About 60% removal of atrazine was achieved using PY-amended BS. Bioslurries inoculated with PY had relatively high laccase activity at about 2,200 U/L. Laccase activity was seven times higher in samples where BC was also present, which suggests a synergistic effect between BC and PY. Concentrations of phenazine-1-carboxylic acid, an antibiotic with a biopesticide effect, were also relatively important in PY-inoculated bioslurries.
HIGHLIGHTS
Pseudomonas yamanorum was successfully grown on municipal biosolids (BS) with/without the addition of a commercial blend of Bacillus spp.
P. yamanorum induced the reduction of atrazine from BS.
Phenazine-1-carboxylic acid was produced in P. yamanorum inoculated BS.
INTRODUCTION
Effective removal of trace organic contaminants (TrOCs), such as pesticides and pharmaceuticals, from wastewater, is becoming an important issue to address since the long-term effects of TrOCs can be harmful to aquatic environments and human health (Daughton 2010). Although hydrophobic TrOCs are more likely to be removed from wastewaters by sorption to sludge, the removal efficiency can still be limited from one wastewater treatment plant (WWTP) to another depending on the type of treatment process used and various conditions such as temperature, retention time (solid and hydraulic) and even the dilution of wastewater caused by rainwater (Vieno et al. 2007). To achieve an effective removal of many TrOCs, costly and complex physico-chemical processes capable of processing the daily peak flow rate would need to be developed and implemented (World Health Organization 2012).
Several TrOCs removed during the wastewater treatment process get concentrated in sludge, which may then be valorized in agriculture as a soil amendment. Biosolids (BS) typically contain phosphorus, nitrogen, potash, proteins, grease and fat, cellulose, various trace metallic elements and TrOCs (Vaithyanathan et al. 2020). Many of these promote bacterial growth and can benefit plant growth. If the undesirable trace metallic elements and TrOCs can be removed effectively, the BS can be safely used as a nutrient source for plants.
According to Vieno et al. (2007) and Spahr et al. (2020), various contaminants can be partially transformed or removed through biologically supported and abiotic mechanisms. The extent of the transformation or removal depends on the sludge stabilization process used and it is generally reported that not all adsorbed TrOCs can be transformed by a given process (Vieno et al. 2007; Spahr et al. 2020). Even if they could be, there are many transformation products that may be as harmful as or more harmful than the parent TrOC molecule (Yang et al. 2016; Spahr et al. 2020). These transformation products will still get released into the environment and could eventually reach our food chain through desorption from sludge on croplands.
Therefore, an economical and simple solution is required to reduce the TrOC load in municipal BS. Bioaugmentation (El Fantroussi & Agathos 2005), which consists of isolating and using the most effective strains to transform TrOCs from a given environmental matrix, is one of the promising options (Wattiau et al. 2001; Drouin et al. 2008). Various microorganisms could have the potential to transform a variety of compounds found in BS through various mechanisms (Olicón-Hernández et al. 2017). To survive and thrive in municipal sludge, it is essential for the selected microorganism to be resistant to endogenous microorganisms as well as various contaminants that may be present in municipal BS such as fertilizers, pesticides, pharmaceuticals and heavy metals.
Pseudomonas genus has demonstrated a good tolerance level to some heavy metals, such as lead, in addition to its ability to remove lead (Vélez et al. 2021). Pseudomonas spp. uses various mechanisms including biosorption, bioaccumulation and the production of exopolysaccharides, to survive in the presence of heavy metals such as lead (Vélez et al. 2021).
Atrazine can be transformed by Pseudomonas spp. through an oxidative pathway and a hydrolytic pathway (Belal et al. 2013; Tonelli Fernandes et al. 2018). Transformation via the oxidative pathway is done under aerobic conditions via dealkylation, dechlorination, deamination and ring cleavage (Belal et al. 2013; Tonelli Fernandes et al. 2018). Transformation via the hydrolytic pathway is done via dehalogenation, N-dealkylation, deamination and ring cleavage (Belal et al. 2013). In both cases, it leads to the formation of cyanuric acid which can then be further mineralized to form CO2 and NH3 (Belal et al. 2013; Tonelli Fernandes et al. 2018). The toxic effects of atrazine on humans, plants, animals and various microorganisms have been extensively studied and well-established. Generally, atrazine causes oxidative stress in some non-target plants and microbes, whereas, in humans, it disrupts the hypothalamic control of pituitary-ovarian function (Singh et al. 2018). However, previous studies reported that the metabolites formed through biodegradation showed fewer toxic effects than the parent compound, atrazine (Kross et al. 1992; Kolekar et al. 2014).
The aim of this article is to present the potential of using P. yamanorum LBUM636 (PY) (formerly known as P. fluorescens LBUM636) for BS decontamination and valorization, whether it is used alone or with a blend of commercially available microorganisms to improve BS treatments. To demonstrate this, the removal of atrazine from BS accumulated in sewage treatment plants and the production of phenazine-1-carboxylic acid (PCA), an antibiotic, produced by PY-inoculated BS, are presented and discussed in this paper. As a basis for comparison, a commercial product (BactoCharge (BC)), used for sludge decontamination, has been selected to compare PY efficiency. This product contains mostly Bacilli strains that are known to be efficient for wastewater treatment (Wattiau et al. 2001; Drouin et al. 2008; Vaithyanathan et al. 2021). Amylase, lipase and protease are also in the commercial product to increase the initial rate of treatment. In addition, a preliminary evaluation is carried out of the compatibility of and synergy between PY and BC. Since PCA can act as a natural pesticide, quantifying its production is also of great interest and may give added value to treated BS used in selected applications in agriculture.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Chemicals
All reagents used were of analytical grade or better. 2,2′-azino-bis(3-ethylbenzothiazoline-6-sulphonic acid), veratryl alcohol, para-nitrophenyl phosphate, casein, para-nitrophenyl palmitate, soluble starch and pesticide standard, supplied in powder form (purity > 95%), were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (Saint-Louis, MO, USA). Water was purified and deionized by a Milli-Q purification system (minimum resistivity 18 MΩ cm; Millipore, Billerica, MA, USA).
P. yamanorum LBUM636 was provided by NUVAC Eco-Sciences Inc. Bacteria from BactoCharge (BC), a commercially available dry powder product (NUVAC Eco-Sciences Inc, Valcourt, QC, Canada), composed of a Bacilli blend was used as a parallel treatment for comparison with PY.
BS sampling and characterization
BS and wastewater effluent (WWE) were obtained from a local municipal WWTP in the province of Quebec, Canada. The BS collected were kept frozen (−18 °C) and the effluent was stored at 4 °C prior to use. A 50% (m/v) BS slurry was prepared by adding 50 g of dry BS in 100 mL of effluent in a 500 mL Erlenmeyer flask.
Volumetric parameters such as total solids (TS), total dissolved solids (TDS) and total suspended solids (TSS) in the bioslurry were measured according to standard methods (American Public Health Association 2023). After measuring the volumetric parameters of the bioslurry, the samples were centrifuged at 4,500 rpm (1.8× g) for 10 min to obtain pellet and supernatant. The supernatant was filtered through a 0.45 μm membrane. The activities of hydrolytic and oxidoreductase enzymes, such as laccase, lignin peroxidase, aryl alcohol oxidase, protease, phosphatase, lipase and amylase were assayed in the supernatant of the bioslurry according to previously established studies (Folin 1929; Tabatabai & Bremner 1969; Kumar & Rapheal 2011; Yu et al. 2013; Touahar et al. 2014; Rathankumar et al. 2019).
Inoculum preparation
A one-liter PY preculture with Tryptic Soy Broth was initially prepared in a 2 L Erlenmeyer flask placed on a rotating plate for 24 h (Oberhofer 1979). This culture was then transferred into a 7 L bioreactor, containing 5 L of fresh culture broth, and left for 48 h with aeration of 30 mmol/L/h and agitation at 150 rpm. The resultant culture was centrifuged at 4,500 rpm (1.8× g) for 15 min, the supernatant was then discarded, and the PY inoculum was obtained from the pellet. The BC was inoculated directly in the BS at the beginning of the experiment.
Bioaugmentation by PY and BC using aerobic digestion
To obtain a greater range of results, the strain's performance was evaluated over a 90-day period with samples being taken every 30 days (on Days 0, 30, 60 and 90).
Bioslurry samples of 100 mL (TSS at 43.85 g/L and TDS at 1.65 g/L) were inoculated with 10% (w/v) of a concentrated PY culture in a 500 mL Erlenmeyer flask. A similar procedure was applied with BC. A third sample group, where both PY and BC were co-inoculated at a concentration of 10% (w/v), was prepared. To ensure that BC did not prevent the growth of PY, BC was added to the samples 3 days after PY. A negative control sample group was also prepared in the same way except these samples were not inoculated. All the flasks were incubated at 27 °C with continuous orbital agitation at 150 rpm for 90 days. Each sample was prepared in duplicate and samples from each treatment were analyzed twice.
To compare the samples with the control, a statistical variance analysis (ANOVA) was performed using a Holm–Sidak test (Sigma plot, version 11, Systat Software Inc), wherever necessary. The level of significance is expressed as the P-value < 0.05.
Atrazine and PCA extraction and analysis
Analysis of the presence of atrazine and PCA was done through UPLC-MS/MS according to a previously developed method (Haroune et al. 2015; Rathankumar et al. 2020). Atrazine and PCA were extracted from the bioslurry using a QuEChERS method (Zhang et al. 2019).
Quantification of the atrazine and PCA was carried out with an Ultra Performance Liquid Chromatography (UPLC), Acquity UPLC system, with a reverse phase C18 HSS T3 1.8 μm column, 2.1 × 50 mm from Waters Corporation (Waters Corporation, Milford, MA, USA). This device is coupled to a tandem quadrupole mass spectrometer, Acquity UPLC XEVO TQ detector. Quantification of the molecules was performed by electro-nebulization in positive mode MS/MS-ESI (+). The mobile phases consisted of water + 0.1% formic acid (H2O + 0.1% AF) and methanol + 0.1% formic acid (MeOH + 0.1% AF). The following parameters were used: cone voltage 20 V, capillary voltage 2.5 kV, temperature 150 °C, desolvation temperature 450 °C, desolvation gas (N2) at 800 L/h, cone gas (N2) at 50 L/h and collision gas (Ar) at 0.38 mL/h.
RESULTS
Atrazine removal
Concentrations of atrazine in the solid and liquid fractions for all samples at T0 and T90 days after inoculation.
Concentrations of atrazine in the solid and liquid fractions for all samples at T0 and T90 days after inoculation.
pH evolution
Enzymatic activity
Enzyme activities at 30-day intervals over 90 days after inoculation.
In the case of lipase, a significant (P-value < 0.001) increase in production was observed for all samples on Days 60 and 90 compared to the control samples. On the starting day, phosphatase production was constant in all samples and a significant increase in the production (P-value < 0.001) of phosphatase was observed for the combination PY + BC on Day 30. However, the Day 60 results did not reveal a noticeable increase in phosphatase activity between the control and other samples, which was further confirmed using ANOVA analysis (P-value = 0.463). An exceptional increase in amylase activity was observed for PY on Day 30 (P-value < 0.001). While comparing with the control samples, an increase in amylase activity was observed for all samples on Day 60; though activity in PY slightly decreased from Day 30. As can be seen in Figure 3, aryl alcohol oxidase production was negligible in inoculated samples with only very small amounts present in PY (about 5 units/L) and BC (about 20 units/L) on Day 90, which was lower than what was observed for the control group (about 67 units/L) on Day 60. As for lignin peroxidase, relatively high activity was measured on Day 60 in all the samples including the control samples and no statistically significant difference (P-value = 0.171) was observed between the control samples and the rest of the samples. Since there is no significant difference in activity between the control group and all the other samples, lignin peroxidase activity is not linked to the presence of PY or BC. Results were negligible for all samples (Figure 3) on Day 90.
Phenazine-1-carboxylic acid production
Concentrations of phenazine-1-carboxylic acid (PCA) in the solid and liquid fraction samples at T0 and T90 days after inoculation.
Concentrations of phenazine-1-carboxylic acid (PCA) in the solid and liquid fraction samples at T0 and T90 days after inoculation.
DISCUSSION
According to the literature, PY can produce hydrolytic and ligninolytic enzymes such as laccase and lignin peroxidase involved in the transformation mechanisms of TrOCs in BS (Belal et al. 2013; Janusz et al. 2017; Tonelli Fernandes et al. 2018). Ligninolytic enzymes are of particular interest for their ability to efficiently transform many TrOCs (Yang et al. 2017; Asif et al. 2018). Therefore, it may be possible to significantly reduce the concentration of TrOCs with an adequate consortium of microorganisms.
The results presented in Figures 1 and 3 for PY suggest that laccase is effective in removing atrazine. This is supported by other recent studies where the elimination of atrazine by laccase in BS was evaluated (Vaithyanathan et al. 2022). However, the results in Figure 1 do not show a significantly higher atrazine removal efficiency for PY + BC than for PY even though the laccase activity is seven times greater for PY + BC than it is for PY. This might be explained by the reduced presence in the PY + BC treated samples of other enzymes capable of atrazine removal such as lignin modifying enzymes and cytochrome P450 (Belal et al. 2013; Haroune et al. 2017; Tonelli Fernandes et al. 2018). The BC samples showed similar results to the PY samples for atrazine removal, even though no laccase was present in the BC cultures. Furthermore, it has been observed that many strains of Bacillus, including B. subtilis, are capable of producing laccase and can be effectively used for bioremediation purposes (Sheikhi et al. 2012). Under the culture conditions used in this study, the fact that BC did not produce laccase may be explained by an environmental stress that may have promoted the production of other enzymes and intracellular and extracellular mechanisms such as biosorption, dehalogenation, dealkylation, dechlorination, deamination and ring cleavage that can favor the removal of atrazine (Belal et al. 2013; Tonelli Fernandes et al. 2018; Vaithyanathan et al. 2022). It is also possible that the peak of laccase production in BC was reached between sampling points, which would make it appear as if there was very little laccase activity. Individually, many of the Bacillus spp. and Pseudomonas spp. have been confirmed to be very efficient at removing atrazine (Wang et al. 2014; Zhu et al. 2019; Singh et al. 2020). It can be observed from Figure 3 that enzyme activity was lower for lipase, phosphatase, amylase and aryl alcohol oxidase and unchanged for lignin peroxidase when PY and BC were combined. In other studies, it was observed that the presence of PY can promote laccase activity in other microorganisms (Johansen & Olsson 2005). This could mean that PY is not directly responsible for laccase production but renders the BS more favorable for other beneficial microorganisms and promotes mechanisms which require a pH near 7.
While laccase may be a key enzyme in atrazine removal and potentially many other TrOCs, the results did not demonstrate a significantly greater overall removal rate between the PY + BC samples with the highest concentration and the PY or BC samples with much lower laccase activity. Since the activity of other monitored enzymes was not significantly different for the various inoculated samples, it might be deduced that other enzymes and mechanisms induced by the presence of PY and BC must also contribute to the atrazine removal potential such as dehalogenation, dealkylation, dechlorination, deamination and ring cleavage (Belal et al. 2013; Tonelli Fernandes et al. 2018). This would explain the relatively similar atrazine removal rate in all the inoculated samples. However, results do show a tendency for a slightly higher atrazine removal rate in the samples inoculated with PY and BC than in samples containing only one of them. Therefore, it can be speculated that the combination of PY with BC might yield a slightly higher atrazine removal rate and possible synergy between the microorganisms in BC with PY. Synergistic relationships have been observed in other studies between PY and B. subtilis as well as with B. amyloliquefaciens for the well-being of plants and prevention of charcoal rot disease (Gamez et al. 2019; Ahmid & Ismail 2020). Since various microorganisms have multiple mechanisms resulting in various pathways that can lead to the transformation of a given TrOC such as atrazine, it is highly probable that PY and BC mechanisms are favoring each other's atrazine transformation pathways, resulting in a more efficient and complete transformation of atrazine than these microorganisms can achieve individually with their own atrazine transformation pathways.
The effectiveness of laccase to remove common TrOCs is also presented in another study in which laccase has a removal efficiency of at least 50% for 29 out of the 30 TrOCs selected, 13 of which had a > 90% removal efficiency (Asif et al. 2018). Various studies clearly demonstrate how highly effective laccase is in removing a variety of TrOCs from BS (Asif et al. 2018; Vaithyanathan et al. 2022). This confirms that laccase-producing microorganisms, such as BC and PY, are useful for the degradation of atrazine through laccase production (Vaithyanathan et al. 2022).
A clear distinction can be seen between the pH evolution of the control samples where the pH decreased steadily from 6 to 3 during the entire experiment and that of all the inoculated samples where the pH increased to 7–8. While the pH decreased in the PY samples during the last 30 days, the final pH was still significantly higher than it was in the control samples, which demonstrates that the presence of PY has a beneficial impact in regulating pH levels within the optimal range (pH 6–9.5) required by law in several jurisdictions for effluents emerging from WWTP (Regulation respecting municipal wastewater treatment works, 2020). Also, the concomitant presence of BC and PY provoked an even greater increase than either one on their own, which suggests that a synergistic effect occurs for pH regulation when using both BC and PY together. This also makes the BS more favorable for other beneficial microorganisms and promotes mechanisms which require a pH near 7 (Guardado 2019).
Other microorganisms such as Arthrobacter sp. ZXY-2, and various strains of the Enterobacter, Pseudomonas, Bacillus and Providencia genera have shown significant potential for atrazine removal (El-Bestawy et al. 2014; Zhao et al. 2018). A study conducted by El-Bestawy et al. (2014) demonstrated that seven bacterial species from the Enterobacter, Pseudomonas, Bacillus and Providencia genera demonstrated a high resistance to atrazine with high growth stimulation (70.7–88.7%) in atrazine-contaminated soil in addition to efficiently removing atrazine and its chlorinated derivatives (El-Bestawy et al. 2014). A beneficial synergistic effect was also observed from using a consortium of atrazine-resistant strains from the Enterobacter, Pseudomonas, Bacillus and Providencia genera, where greater atrazine removal was achieved compared to the atrazine removal achieved by the strains individually (El-Bestawy et al. 2014).
Various studies have demonstrated that the combination of a bioaugmentation and biostimulation approach yielded better results for atrazine removal as well as for other contaminants (El-Bestawy et al. 2014; Aliyu et al. 2023). Therefore, bioaugmentation with a consortium of selected bacteria coupled with biostimulation may be the best bioremediation technique since it is an effective, low-cost and environmentally friendly approach for the decontamination of atrazine-contaminated matrices and may also be used to remove many other TrOCs (El-Bestawy et al. 2014; Aliyu et al. 2023).
Atrazine removal may be achieved via a hydrolytic pathway and in many cases, the process of mineralization forms traces of cyanuric acid (among other degradation products) (Monard et al. 2008; El-Bestawy et al. 2014; Aliyu et al. 2023). Also, Monard and coworkers have shown that Pseudomonas sp. ADP had a higher survival rate, when exposed to atrazine for 10 days, than Chelatobacter heintzii (Monard et al. 2008).
As for PCA production, findings from a study have shown that the presence of PY leads to the production of PCA, an antibiotic with a biopesticide effect, which could provide added value to treated sludge when used in agriculture (Arseneault et al. 2013). A study demonstrated over a 4-day period that a significant growth inhibition of Botrytis cinerea was only attained with a PCA concentration of at least 1.56 mg/L (Simionato et al. 2017). Since, in another study, the use of this PY strain alone was shown to have a significant effect on potato scabs and blight, it is reasonable to assume that using the same strain of PY or a similar one, can achieve higher concentrations of PCA than what was obtained after 90 days in this experiment (Arseneault et al. 2013; Morrison et al. 2017). Other strains of Pseudomonas spp. such as P. aeruginosa and P. chlororaphis have also been shown to have good potential for the production of PCA and have demonstrated an effectiveness in reducing and eliminating plant pathogens and promoting plant growth when used in soil (Jain & Pandey 2016; Simionato et al. 2017). It was confirmed that PY produces PCA (about 0.3 mg/L) as demonstrated in Figure 4. This is far less than the values presented in other studies for which a significant effect could be observed but PCA production could be increased if the culture parameters were optimized. It is also possible that a higher concentration was achieved during the 90 days and then gradually decreased to the measured concentration (as observed with the fluctuating enzymatic activity). A higher production of PCA could possibly be achieved with a higher initial concentration of PY or through a proper optimization process. However, the presence of BC reduced the production of PCA by a factor of five. This could indicate that adding PY to BC may not yield a high enough concentration of PCA to provide a significant biopesticide effect when applying the BS treated with PY and BC on agricultural fields. Further testing with optimized conditions would have to be done with pests and agricultural plants to determine the biopesticide efficiency of PY and BC combined vs. PY and BC on their own.
CONCLUSION
The PY strain studied produced significant concentrations of laccase (about 2,200 U/L), a ligninolytic enzyme useful for the removal of various TrOCs found in BS. PY also produced some quantities of lipase, amylase and phosphatase, which are also key enzymes for the treatment of BS. PY helps the existing bacterial flora in BS promote greater treatment efficiency by helping to remove the contaminants in BS. When PY is used in combination with BC, a synergistic effect can be observed where there is increased atrazine removal efficiency and seven times higher laccase production (about 15,000 U/L). Other studies have shown that laccase is a key enzyme involved in the degradation of many TrOCs such as atrazine and that bioaugmentation involving a consortium of TrOC-degrading microorganisms (including strains of the Pseudomonas and Bacillus genera) combined with biostimulation may be one of the most cost-effective ways to remove TrOCs such as atrazine from municipal BS, soil and water.
It was observed in this study that PY produces PCA (circa 300 μg/L in aqueous phase), although when combined with BC the yield was five times lower. Further tests involving agricultural plants and plant pathogens will be required to determine the biopesticide efficiency of PY and BC combined versus PY and BC on their own as well as the effect on plant growth.
It can be concluded from this study that PY has the potential to increase the efficiency of BC for the removal of atrazine. PY also produces PCA, which could help give a biopesticide effect to the sludge used on agricultural fields.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
This project was supported by a grant from the National Science and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC; grant number 2019-06178). The authors are thankful to Olivier Savary and the members of the Environmental Engineering Laboratory of the Université de Sherbrooke for their assistance and NUVAC Eco-Sciences Inc. for supplying P. yamanorum LBUM636 and BactoCharge.
DATA AVAILABILITY STATEMENT
All relevant data are included in the paper or its Supplementary Information.
CONFLICT OF INTEREST
The authors declare there is no conflict.