Historically, low-pressure membranes (microfiltration (MF) and ultrafiltration (UF)) used in potable water treatment are made of polymers (polysulfone (PS), polypropylene (PP), polyethersulfone (PES), polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF) etc). Recently, membranes made of ceramic materials (aluminium oxide) have been developed by MetaWater (Japan), Kubota (Japan) and others and is being marketed in the United States (US) by Krüger, Inc. (Cary, NC). Ceramic membranes offer several potential advantages over polymeric membranes, including higher mechanical robustness and ability to handle higher loading of particulates, higher resistance to oxidants and membrane cleaning chemicals, higher membrane integrity, longer service life and compact footprint. The authors conducted collaborative evaluations of this emerging technology at two different places; (i) Elm Fork Water Treatment Plant (WTP) of Dallas Water Utilities (DWU), Dallas, Texas, USA and (ii) Graham Mesa WTP, City of Rifle, Rifle, Colorado, USA. The evaluations included pilot testing of ceramic membranes in direct filtration mode (i.e. without clarification) and with coagulant addition. The water streams that were pilot tested at Elm Fork WTP included Trinity River water, spent filter backwash wastewater and lagoon recycle water (spent filter backwash water combined with clarifier blow down water). The City of Rifle pilot testing was conducted on Colorado River water. This paper presents the key results of these two pilot studies. Results of pilot testing were used to define the potential membrane flux, backwash protocols (interval and duration), chemical enhanced backwash (CEB) and clean-in-place (CIP) protocols. Pilot test results and engineering judgment were used for developing concept-level sizing and outlining parameters for future evaluation. This paper will discuss the key technical and economic considerations of the emerging treatment technology and its potential applications for potable water treatment. This paper will be of interest to water providers that are considering alternatives to treat challenging source waters (waters with high particulates and under heavy microbial influence), build new compact water treatment plants, increase plant capacity through membrane retrofits and treat recycle streams at existing WTPs.
Skip Nav Destination
Article navigation
Research Article|
December 01 2010
Evaluation of an emerging water treatment technology: ceramic membranes Available to Purchase
S. N. Kommineni;
1Malcolm Pirnie, Inc., 1700 West Loop S., Ste 1450, Houston, TX 77027, USA E-mail: [email protected]; [email protected]
E-mail: [email protected]
Search for other works by this author on:
J. Bryck;
J. Bryck
2Malcolm Pirnie, Inc., 4646 E. Van Buren St, Ste 400, Phoenix, AZ 85008, USA E-mail: [email protected]
Search for other works by this author on:
C. Stringer;
C. Stringer
3Dallas Water Utilities, City Hall, 1500 Marilla, Room 4AN, Dallas, TX 75201, USA E-mail: [email protected]
Search for other works by this author on:
C. Stevens;
C. Stevens
4City of Rifle, 202 Railroad Ave, Rifle, CO 81650, USA E-mail: [email protected]
Search for other works by this author on:
N. Meyers;
N. Meyers
5Krüger Inc, 401 Harrison Oaks Blvd, Ste. 100, Cary, NC 27513, USA E-mail: [email protected]
Search for other works by this author on:
B. Karnik;
B. Karnik
1Malcolm Pirnie, Inc., 1700 West Loop S., Ste 1450, Houston, TX 77027, USA E-mail: [email protected]; [email protected]
Search for other works by this author on:
R. Hoffman;
R. Hoffman
6Malcolm Pirnie, Inc, 12400 Coit Road, Ste 1200, Dallas, TX 75251, USA E-mail: [email protected]
Search for other works by this author on:
L. Sullivan
L. Sullivan
7Malcolm Pirnie, Inc, 100 Fillmore Street, Suite 200, Denver, CO 80620, USA E-mail: [email protected]
Search for other works by this author on:
Water Supply (2010) 10 (5): 765–770.
Citation
S. N. Kommineni, J. Bryck, C. Stringer, C. Stevens, N. Meyers, B. Karnik, R. Hoffman, L. Sullivan; Evaluation of an emerging water treatment technology: ceramic membranes. Water Supply 1 December 2010; 10 (5): 765–770. doi: https://doi.org/10.2166/ws.2010.175
Download citation file:
Sign in
Don't already have an account? Register
Client Account
You could not be signed in. Please check your email address / username and password and try again.
Could not validate captcha. Please try again.
eBook
Pay-Per-View Access
$38.00