The beamhouse sections of tanneries produce around 45% of the total wastewater of factories. A beamhouse wastewater, collected after the oxidation of sulphide compounds and diluted to average COD and ammonium concentrations around 550 and 90 mg/L respectively, was treated separately in two reactors: a sequencing batch reactor (SBR) and a membrane sequencing batch reactor (MSBR). Both systems were operated for 150 days with similar conditions without sludge purge, operating at low feed to microorganisms (F/M) ratios and applying organic and ammonium loading rates up to 0.75 gCOD/L·d and 0.12 gNH4+/L·d respectively. The SBR achieved low ammonium and nitrogen removal rates and COD removal values close to 90%, which decreased dramatically during the last 30 days of operation. An important washout of microorganisms in the SBR was noticed due to the proliferation of filamentous bacteria. However, removal efficiencies close to 100% in ammonium and 90% in COD were achieved in the MSBR, and very stable operation was maintained.
Skip Nav Destination
Article navigation
Research Article|
December 01 2003
Tannery wastewater treatment: comparison between SBR and MSBR Available to Purchase
J.M. Martinez;
J.M. Martinez
1Chemical Engineering Department, Institute of Technology, Campus Sur, University of Santiago de Compostela, Santiago de Compostela E-15782, Spain
Search for other works by this author on:
A. Goltara;
A. Goltara
1Chemical Engineering Department, Institute of Technology, Campus Sur, University of Santiago de Compostela, Santiago de Compostela E-15782, Spain
Search for other works by this author on:
R. Mendez
1Chemical Engineering Department, Institute of Technology, Campus Sur, University of Santiago de Compostela, Santiago de Compostela E-15782, Spain
E-mail: [email protected]
Search for other works by this author on:
Water Supply (2003) 3 (5-6): 275–282.
Citation
J.M. Martinez, A. Goltara, R. Mendez; Tannery wastewater treatment: comparison between SBR and MSBR. Water Supply 1 December 2003; 3 (5-6): 275–282. doi: https://doi.org/10.2166/ws.2003.0178
Download citation file:
Sign in
Don't already have an account? Register
Client Account
You could not be signed in. Please check your email address / username and password and try again.
Could not validate captcha. Please try again.
eBook
Pay-Per-View Access
$38.00