Understanding the characteristics of soil solute transport is fundamental to the design and management of furrow irrigation systems. This study determined the soil hydraulic and solute transport parameters by inverse solution with HYDRUS-2D and then verified them. The experimental data were obtained from the infiltration of clay loam and sandy loam of different potassium nitrate (KNO3) concentrations under furrow irrigation. Then, the initial soil water content (θ0), KNO3 concentration, and water depth (h0) affecting the transport characteristics of nitrate nitrogen (NO3-N) and potassium (K+) were analyzed. The results indicated that the soil hydraulic and solute transport parameters determined from the inversion solution with HYDRUS-2D were reliable. The soil saturated water content, saturated hydraulic conductivity, and empirical parameter n in the van Genuchten–Mualem model increase with the increase of KNO3 concentrations, whereas the empirical parameter a shows a decreasing tendency. The distribution range of NO3-N increased with the increases of θ0 and the KNO3 concentration, which had barely any effect on the range of K+ distribution. The horizontal distribution range of NO3-N and K+ increased with the increase of h0, but it had no obvious influence on the vertical range.

  • Soil hydraulic and solute transport parameters were determined by inverse solution with HYDRUS-2D, and then the reliability was verified.

  • θn, n and Ks (VG-M model) increased with increasing KNO3 concentration, while a exhibited a decreasing trend

  • The initial soil water content, KNO3 concentration and water depth have an obvious effect on the distribution of NO3-N.

  • K+ was mainly distributed within 10 cm of the furrow bottom.

Understanding the characteristics of soil solute transport is fundamental to the design and management of furrow irrigation systems. However, the study of this problem is complicated because of the nonlinear relationship between soil capillary force and gravity at different locations during furrow irrigation, which can be affected by soil physical properties and different irrigation technical factors, and the water potential gradient of fertilizer solution infiltration varies at different locations. Therefore, some researchers (Li et al. 2004; Ebrahimian et al. 2012b) have analyzed the effects of different factors on the transport characteristics of water content and fertilizer (such as nitrate nitrogen NO3-N and ammonium nitrogen NH4+-N) in soil wetting patterns based on fertilizer solution infiltration, and numerous empirical models have been established, which can be used to estimate cumulative infiltration, water content of wetting patterns, and NO3-N and NH4+-N distributions. Due to the influences of soil texture and initial condition, the distributions of different types of ions in the soil exhibit obvious differences. Silberbush & Barber (1983) indicated that potassium ions (K+) have strong adsorption characteristics in soil. Hanson et al. (2006) simulated and analyzed the transport processes of K+ under drip irrigation, and the results proved that K+ can easily accumulate on soil surfaces. Liu et al. (2017) studied results that showed that the distribution of NO3-N was similar to that of soil water content, whereas K+ was concentrated around the Moistube. Experimental research methods can reveal the transport characteristics of soil water and fertilizer, but experimentation is time-consuming, and most research results are limited because they are obtained under specific experimental conditions.

Researchers use various numerical simulation methods to study soil water and fertilizer transport characteristics. Zerihun et al. (2005a, 2005b) established a mathematical model of soil water flow and solute transport for border fertigation and verified that the model accurately simulated the soil water content and solute transport. Doltra & Muñoz (2010) simulated NO3-N transport processes in soil under drip fertigation, and the correlation coefficient between their simulated and measured NO3-N content was higher than 0.76. Tan et al. (2015) simulated the transport characteristics of soil water, NO3-N, and NH4+-N in paddy fields, and the results showed that the simulated values were consistent with the measured values. Li et al. (2019) simulated soil water and nitrogen transport processes under drip irrigation, and the relative error between the simulated and measured soil water content was within 10%; the errors for NO3-N and NH4+-N were within 20%. The aforementioned studies proved that numerical simulation can be used to study the characteristics of fertilizer solution infiltration with high accuracy. Although many studies have been done on solute transport characteristics during fertilizer solution infiltration (Deb et al. 2015; Iqbal et al. 2016; Brunetti et al. 2018; Ranjbar et al. 2019), few publications have considered the effect of the changes in fertilizer concentration on soil hydraulic parameters, and analyzed the influences of various factors (such as initial soil water content, fertilizer concentration, and water depth) on the solute transport characteristics.

Therefore, the objectives of this study were: (1) to determine the soil hydraulic and solute transport parameters by inverse solution with HYDRUS-2D from infiltration data of different potassium nitrate (KNO3) concentrations under furrow irrigation, and then verify the reliability of the parameters; and (2) to analyze the effect of initial soil water content (θ0), KNO3 concentration, and water depth (h0) on the NO3-N and K+ transport characteristics by HYDRUS-2D.

Fertilizer solution infiltration experiment design

Soil samples were taken from Yangling District (107°55′50″–108°07′50″ E and 34°14′30″–34°19′00″ N), Shaanxi Province. The terrain of Yangling District is divided into three terraces from south to north. The altitude of the first terrace is 420–430 m, and the soil texture is sandy loam. The altitudes of the second and third terraces are 450–485 m and 515–540 m, respectively, and the soil texture is clay loam. According to the topographical features of Yangling District, soil samples were collected from typical fields cultivated all year round in the first and third terraces at a depth of 0–60 cm (the depth where the roots of crops such as wheat and corn are mainly distributed). The residual water content of air-dried soil samples was measured using a weighing method. The soil texture was determined by a Mastersizer 2000 particle size analyzer. The contents of NO3-N and K+ in the soil samples were determined by an ultraviolet spectrophotometer and a flame photometer, respectively. The results are listed in Table 1.

Table 1

Soil physical and chemical properties of the experimental soils

Soil samples siteSoil textureNO3-N/(mg kg−1)K+/(mg kg−1)θr/(g g−1)Content of soil particle /%
Clay (<0.002 mm)Silt (0.002–0.02 mm)Sand (0.02–2 mm)
First terrace Sandy loam 33.4 19.9 0.05 14.76 27.12 58.12 
Third terrace Clay loam 49.6 32.7 0.03 23.63 30.25 46.12 
Soil samples siteSoil textureNO3-N/(mg kg−1)K+/(mg kg−1)θr/(g g−1)Content of soil particle /%
Clay (<0.002 mm)Silt (0.002–0.02 mm)Sand (0.02–2 mm)
First terrace Sandy loam 33.4 19.9 0.05 14.76 27.12 58.12 
Third terrace Clay loam 49.6 32.7 0.03 23.63 30.25 46.12 

Note:θr is the residual water content.

KNO3 is a potassium–nitrogen compound fertilizer with stable physical and chemical properties. It can supplement the potassium and nitrogen required for crop growth at the same time, and it is widely used in crops and fruit trees. Therefore, KNO3 was selected as the experimental fertilizer in this study. It was dissolved in water to carry out fertilizer solution infiltration experiments. The soil bulk density (ρ) of the first and third terraces in Yangling District varied from 1.40 to 1.50 g cm−3 and 1.30 to 1.40 g cm−3, respectively (Nie et al. 2017). Therefore, two bulk density cases were designed for sandy loam and clay loam in this study, namely 1.40 and 1.50 g cm−3 for sandy loam and 1.30 and 1.40 g cm−3 for clay loam. Based on the ranges of KNO3 concentration set by previous studies (Zipelevish et al. 2000; Wang et al. 2010; Liu et al. 2017), the KNO3 concentration was tested, in this study, at four gradients: 0, 250, 600, and 900 mg L−1. Furthermore, θ0 and h0 were selected as the experimental design factors to carry out infiltration experiments of furrow irrigation (Table 2).

Table 2

Experimental design fertilizer solution infiltration under furrow irrigation

Clay loam
Sandy loam
No.C /(mg L−1)θ0 /(cm3 cm−3)h0 /(cm)ρ /(g cm−3)No.C /(mg L−1)θ0 /(cm3 cm−3)h0 /(cm)ρ /(g cm−3)
T1 0.208 10.5 1.30 T1 0.168 10.5 1.40 
T2 250 0.130 14.5 1.30 T2 250 0.112 14.5 1.40 
T3 600 0.130 10.5 1.30 T3 600 0.112 10.5 1.40 
T4 900 0.156 5.5 1.30 T4 900 0.140 5.5 1.40 
T5 0.168 14.5 1.40 T5 0.150 14.5 1.50 
T6 250 0.140 14.5 1.40 T6 250 0.120 14.5 1.50 
T7 600 0.140 5.5 1.40 T7 600 0.120 5.5 1.50 
T8 900 0.224 10.5 1.40 T8 900 0.180 10.5 1.50 
V9* 0.208 5.5 1.30 V9* 0.168 5.5 1.40 
V10* 250 0.156 5.5 1.30 V10* 250 0.140 5.5 1.40 
V11* 600 0.208 14.5 1.30 V11* 600 0.168 14.5 1.40 
V12* 900 0.156 10.5 1.30 V12* 900 0.140 10.5 1.40 
Clay loam
Sandy loam
No.C /(mg L−1)θ0 /(cm3 cm−3)h0 /(cm)ρ /(g cm−3)No.C /(mg L−1)θ0 /(cm3 cm−3)h0 /(cm)ρ /(g cm−3)
T1 0.208 10.5 1.30 T1 0.168 10.5 1.40 
T2 250 0.130 14.5 1.30 T2 250 0.112 14.5 1.40 
T3 600 0.130 10.5 1.30 T3 600 0.112 10.5 1.40 
T4 900 0.156 5.5 1.30 T4 900 0.140 5.5 1.40 
T5 0.168 14.5 1.40 T5 0.150 14.5 1.50 
T6 250 0.140 14.5 1.40 T6 250 0.120 14.5 1.50 
T7 600 0.140 5.5 1.40 T7 600 0.120 5.5 1.50 
T8 900 0.224 10.5 1.40 T8 900 0.180 10.5 1.50 
V9* 0.208 5.5 1.30 V9* 0.168 5.5 1.40 
V10* 250 0.156 5.5 1.30 V10* 250 0.140 5.5 1.40 
V11* 600 0.208 14.5 1.30 V11* 600 0.168 14.5 1.40 
V12* 900 0.156 10.5 1.30 V12* 900 0.140 10.5 1.40 

Note:θ0 is the initial soil water content; C is the concentration of KNO3; h0 is the water depth of furrow; ρ is the soil bulk density; ‘*’ refers to the verification experiments.

The air-dried soil sample was filtered through a 2 mm sieve, and a 5 cm layer of soil from the sieved material was placed in a soil box; the size of the soil box was 80 × 5 × 100 cm (length × width × height). A furrow was excavated along the side of the soil box, and that furrow had the trapezoidal section commonly used in northern China, with a maximum depth of 15 cm, bottom width of 20 cm and a 1:1 side-slope. Because the furrow was axisymmetric, only a half-section was used in the experiments (the range of ABCDO), as shown in Figure 1(a). The infiltration time and cumulative infiltration were recorded. After the experiments of infiltration, soil samples were collected from different locations (Figure 1(a)), and soil samples were divided into two parts. Some soil samples were measured for water content through a weighing method, and other soil samples were subjected to an ultraviolet spectrophotometer and flame photometer to determine their contents of NO3-N and K+, respectively.

Figure 1

Furrow cross-section and boundary conditions for model solving. (a) Furrow cross-section and measured points. (b) Boundary conditions.

Figure 1

Furrow cross-section and boundary conditions for model solving. (a) Furrow cross-section and measured points. (b) Boundary conditions.

Close modal

Model descriptions

Soil water movement model

Assuming that the soil is a homogeneous, isotropic porous medium – irrespective of the air resistance inside the soil, temperature, and the effect of evaporation on infiltration – the equation of soil water movement in infiltration of a furrow can be expressed as (Šimůnek et al. 1999):
(1)
where z is a vertical coordinate that is positive in a downward direction, θ is the volumetric water content (cm3 cm−3), t is the time (min), h is the soil water pressure head (cm), and K(h) represents the unsaturated hydraulic conductivity (cm min−1). Regarding the soil water effective saturation, K(h) and Se are described using the van Genuchten–Mualem (VG-M) model (van Genuchten 1980), which is as follows:
(2)
(3)
where θr is the residual soil water content (cm3 cm−3); θs is the saturated water content (cm3 cm−3); m, n, a, and l are empirical parameters of the soil–water characteristic curve, m = 1−(1/n), and l is usually equal to 0.5; and Ks is the saturated hydraulic conductivity (cm min−1).

Soil solute transport model

The partial differential equation governing two-dimensional solute transport during transient water flow in a variably saturated rigid porous medium is taken as (Šimůnek et al. 1999):
(4)
where Ck is the solution concentration (g cm−3); k = 1, 2 represents NO3 and K+, respectively; ρ is the soil bulk density (g cm−3); αk is the adsorption parameter, indicating the partition coefficient of the solute in the solid–liquid phase (cm3 g−1); qx and qz are the water fluxes in the horizontal and vertical directions (cm min−1), respectively; and Dxx, Dxz, and Dzz are components of the dispersion coefficient tensor (cm2 min−1), which can be calculated by the following equation:
(5)
where |q| is the absolute value of water flux (cm min−1); DL and DT are the longitudinal and transverse dispersivities (cm), respectively; Dw is the ionic or molecular diffusion coefficient in free water (cm2 min−1); and τ is the tortuosity factor, which can be calculated by the following equation:
(6)

Initial and boundary conditions

The initial conditions of the experiment were that the θ0, NO3-N and K+ concentrations were stable. Therefore, the initial conditions of the equations were such that all the points in the calculation area had the same matric potential:
(7)
(8)
where hn is the pressure head corresponding to the θ0 condition (cm); is the initial soil solute concentration (g cm−3), namely NO3-N and K+ concentrations; and X and Z are the maximum horizontal length and vertical depth of the simulated domain, respectively (X= 80 cm and Z= 100 cm were adopted in this study).

Boundary conditions (Figure 1(b)): DE and EG represent the variable pressure head boundaries, and a constant water depth and solution concentration are maintained. Because of the short durations of the infiltration experiments, the scenario posits no rainfall and no plant cover on the surface, and it is considered to have no external solute supplementation or loss. Therefore, GF and FA represent the atmospheric boundaries, and evaporation can be neglected to create zero-flux boundaries. The left boundary AB is the symmetry axis, and the horizontal flux is 0. The right boundary CD is the symmetry axis of the adjacent furrow, which is regarded as a zero-flux surface. The lower boundary BC contains drainage holes. During the experiment, the wetting front does not reach the base of the soil box and does not affect the process of fertilizer solution infiltration, and the constant initial conditions are established to create a free drainage boundary.

On the basis of the initial (Equations (7) and (8)) and boundary conditions (Figure 1(b)), Equations (1) and (4) are solved by HYDRUS-2D by finite elements, which can define the computational grid automatically. The smaller finite elements are recommended in regions where rapid changes may occur of water content and pressure (such as at the infiltrating surface) and larger ones elsewhere. The resulting computational grid consisted of 2,446 nodes (not shown in Figure 1(b)).

Parameter inverse solution procedure and evaluation

A number of soil hydraulic and solute transport parameters were determined using an inverse solution procedure implementing the Levenberg–Marquardt optimization module built in HYDRUS-2D (Šimůnek et al. 1999), and the experimental data from the infiltration experiments of Nos. T1–T8 (Table 2). The inverse method is based on the minimization of a suitable objective function, which expresses the discrepancy between the measured and simulated values, and it can be expressed as (Ebrahimian et al. 2012a):
(9)
where M is the number of the measurement set; is the measured values (e.g., soil water contents, NO3-N and K+ concentrations) for the jth measurement set at time t (t is the experiment's end time), location x, and depth z; is the corresponding model simulation obtained with the vector of optimized parameters b (i.e., soil hydraulic and solute transport parameters); and vj is weights associated with a particular measurement set and assumed to be equal to 1 in this study. Quality in parameter estimation was assessed using two indicators: the determination coefficient (R2) and SSQ.

This inverse solution procedure has been successfully applied by several researchers (Abbasi et al. 2003; Verbist et al. 2009; Ebrahimian et al. 2012a) to determine soil hydraulic and solute transport parameters. Because the θr has little effect on soil water movement (Wang et al. 2013), θr was set as the water content of air-dried soil in this study. Nitrogen in the KNO3 solution is mainly in the form of NO3 and is negatively charged, and the adsorption of NO3 can be neglected. The soil wetting pattern has a high water-content in fertilizer solution infiltration, and the nitrification of nitrogen is suitable for aerobic environments; thus, the nitrification of NH4+-N can be neglected. Furthermore, the infiltration experiments were brief (the longest time = 6 h), and consequently the mineralization and denitrification of nitrogen in the soil can be neglected in this study. The temperature during the infiltration experiments was approximately 20–25 °C. Siyal et al. (2012) reported that Dw = 0.00113 cm2 min−1 for NO3-N at 20–23 °C, and Ren et al. (2013) wrote that Dw = 0.00395 cm2 min−1 for K+, so the Dw of NO3-N and K+ can be assigned previously published values in the solute transport parameter inversion process of this study. Therefore, the inverse solution was applied to four soil hydraulic parameters, including θs, n, Ks, and a, and three solute transport parameters, including αk of K+, DL and DT of NO3-N and K+. The inverse optimization method simultaneously uses all measured data, i.e., soil water contents and NO3-N and K+ concentrations.

In this study, the reliability of soil hydraulic and solute transport parameters was evaluated by comparing the statistical indicators of the simulated values of cumulative infiltration, soil water contents, NO3-N and K+ concentrations with the measured values for the verification experiments of Nos. V9–V12 (Table 2). The indicators used were the root mean square error (RMSE), the mean percentage of bias error (MPBE) and the mean absolute percentage relative error (MAPRE), which were calculated as follows (Karandish & Šimůnek 2016; Nie et al. 2018):
(10)
(11)
(12)
where Si and Mi are the simulated and measured data, respectively; and N is the number of observations. The RMSE and MAPRE provide an overall measure of the degree to which the data differ from the model estimations. The low RMSE and MAPRE indicate a more favorable model fit. If the MPBE is within ±10%, the MPBE is considered to be within an acceptable range (Moriasi et al. 2007).

Parameter inversion and verification

Inversion solution of the soil hydraulic and solute transport parameters

The cumulative infiltration per unit area curve (cumulative infiltration per length divided by wetted perimeter) under different KNO3 concentrations is shown in Figure 2. From the measured soil water contents and concentrations of NO3-N and K+ at the end of the infiltration experiments of Nos. T1–T8 (Table 2 and Figure 2), the soil hydraulic and solute transport parameters were determined by inverse solution with HYDRUS-2D, and the results are listed in Table 3.

Table 3

The soil hydraulic and solute transport parameters determined by inversion solution in HYDRUS-2D

No.C/(mg·L−1)Soil hydraulic parameters
Solute transport parameters
R2SSQSoil texture
θr/(cm3 cm−3)θs/(cm3 cm−3)anKs/(cm min−1)DL/cmDT/cmαk of K+/(cm3 g−1)
T1 0.042 0.472 0.030 1.392 0.021 4.66 0.245 4.47 0.9600 0.0059 Clay loam 
T2 250 0.042 0.475 0.029 1.408 0.023 0.8754 0.0101 
T3 600 0.042 0.488 0.025 1.421 0.024 0.8321 0.0143 
T4 900 0.042 0.480 0.023 1.439 0.026 0.9033 0.0095 
T5 0.046 0.462 0.020 1.345 0.020 4.03 0.198 0.9322 0.0073 
T6 250 0.046 0.469 0.017 1.353 0.021 0.9129 0.0089 
T7 600 0.046 0.476 0.014 1.361 0.022 0.8126 0.0179 
T8 900 0.046 0.476 0.012 1.367 0.023 0.7856 0.0201 
T1 0.077 0.417 0.059 1.632 0.092 1.95 0.099 3.19 0.9173 0.0082 Sandy loam 
T2 250 0.077 0.418 0.055 1.642 0.096 0.8649 0.0096 
T3 600 0.077 0.421 0.051 1.653 0.099 0.8433 0.0131 
T4 900 0.077 0.426 0.047 1.667 0.102 0.7981 0.0182 
T5 0.082 0.419 0.045 1.426 0.045 1.26 0.059 0.9024 0.0089 
T6 250 0.082 0.419 0.040 1.432 0.050 0.8632 0.0109 
T7 600 0.082 0.424 0.035 1.443 0.053 0.8459 0.0139 
T8 900 0.082 0.424 0.031 1.459 0.058 0.8522 0.0129 
No.C/(mg·L−1)Soil hydraulic parameters
Solute transport parameters
R2SSQSoil texture
θr/(cm3 cm−3)θs/(cm3 cm−3)anKs/(cm min−1)DL/cmDT/cmαk of K+/(cm3 g−1)
T1 0.042 0.472 0.030 1.392 0.021 4.66 0.245 4.47 0.9600 0.0059 Clay loam 
T2 250 0.042 0.475 0.029 1.408 0.023 0.8754 0.0101 
T3 600 0.042 0.488 0.025 1.421 0.024 0.8321 0.0143 
T4 900 0.042 0.480 0.023 1.439 0.026 0.9033 0.0095 
T5 0.046 0.462 0.020 1.345 0.020 4.03 0.198 0.9322 0.0073 
T6 250 0.046 0.469 0.017 1.353 0.021 0.9129 0.0089 
T7 600 0.046 0.476 0.014 1.361 0.022 0.8126 0.0179 
T8 900 0.046 0.476 0.012 1.367 0.023 0.7856 0.0201 
T1 0.077 0.417 0.059 1.632 0.092 1.95 0.099 3.19 0.9173 0.0082 Sandy loam 
T2 250 0.077 0.418 0.055 1.642 0.096 0.8649 0.0096 
T3 600 0.077 0.421 0.051 1.653 0.099 0.8433 0.0131 
T4 900 0.077 0.426 0.047 1.667 0.102 0.7981 0.0182 
T5 0.082 0.419 0.045 1.426 0.045 1.26 0.059 0.9024 0.0089 
T6 250 0.082 0.419 0.040 1.432 0.050 0.8632 0.0109 
T7 600 0.082 0.424 0.035 1.443 0.053 0.8459 0.0139 
T8 900 0.082 0.424 0.031 1.459 0.058 0.8522 0.0129 

Note:ρ is the soil bulk density; C is the concentration of KNO3; θs is the saturated water content; Ks is the saturated hydraulic conductivity; a and n are empirical parameters; θr is the residual soil water content, which is determined according to the residual water content in Table 1 multiplied by the soil bulk density in Table 2; αk is the adsorption parameter; DL and DT are the longitudinal and transverse dispersivities, respectively.

Figure 2

Cumulative infiltration per unit area curves under different potassium nitrate concentrations. (a) Clay loam. (b) Sandy loam.

Figure 2

Cumulative infiltration per unit area curves under different potassium nitrate concentrations. (a) Clay loam. (b) Sandy loam.

Close modal

The cumulative infiltration per unit area showed an increasing trend with the increase of KNO3 concentration. For example, for the cases where KNO3 concentrations were 250, 600, and 900 mg L−1, the cumulative infiltration per unit area of clay loam and sandy loam soil textures increased by 17.05%, 28.65%, 34.71% and 12.20%, 16.19%, 20.45% compared with 0 mg L−1 at the end of the infiltration experiments, respectively (Figure 2). The soil hydraulic parameter inversion results showed that the parameters of θs, n, and Ks increased with the increase of KNO3 concentrations, but a showed a decreasing trend (Table 3), which is consistent with the results of Feng (2017). The reasons may be that K+ has strong adsorption (Silberbush & Barber 1983; Hanson et al. 2006; Ren et al. 2013), which exchanges with the ions on the surface of the soil colloid, changing the properties of the soil colloid and thus affecting the pore structure of the soil. Moreover, the KNO3 solution has a higher solute potential than the water, and the soil–water potential difference at the interface of the wetting front is larger for the KNO3 solution than for the water, which increases the infiltration capacity of the soil (Figure 2). This explanation would be consistent with the research conclusions of Liu et al. (2017). Meanwhile, it should be noted that the parameters of θs, n, and Ks were unlikely to increase continuously with the increase of KNO3 concentrations, and a cannot decrease continuously. The reason may be that with the increase of KNO3 concentrations, the pore structure of the soil is changed and the solute potential at the interface of the wetting front is increased, which makes the soil infiltration capacity gradually increase. However, with the continuous increase of KNO3, the viscosity of water increases, that is, the fluidity of water becomes worse, which will reduce the soil infiltration capacity. Because only four concentrations of KNO3 were considered in this study, and the concentrations are relatively small (the maximum concentration of KNO3 is 900 mg L−1), what leads to this process cannot be reflected upon, and further research is needed on this issue.

The solute dispersivities mainly depend on soil properties, and these parameters have scale characteristics. Beven et al. (1993) and Cote et al. (2003) wrote that DL can be taken as 1/10 of the simulated length. The results of Šimůnek & van Genuchten (2008) and Siyal et al. (2012) proved that DL is generally between 0.1 and 15 cm, and DT takes 1/100–1/5 of DL according to soil properties and can obtain a satisfactory solute transport simulation result. As isotropic soil is used in this study, and the DL and DT of K+ and NO3-N have small differences, which were determined by inverse solution with HYDRUS-2D, so the mean values of DL and DT were adopted under the same bulk density of each soil texture, i.e. the ranges of DL are 4.03–4.66 cm and 1.26–1.95 cm for clay loam and sandy loam, respectively, and the value of DT is approximately 1/20 of DL (Table 3). These findings are basically consistent with the aforementioned results, indicating that the inversion results of DL and DT of NO3-N and K+ are reasonable in this study.

The soil adsorption process of K+ can be described as a linear equation (Hanson et al. 2006; Grecco et al. 2019); that is, αk is a constant value, which is independent of the solution concentration. In addition, the adsorption of K+ is mainly related to soil organic matter and particle content (Long et al. 2001), and thus the αk of K+ is taken as the inversion average value under the same soil texture, namely the αk of K+ is 4.47 and 3.19 cm3 g−1 in clay loam and sandy loam, respectively. The inversion results of αk are close to αk = 1.533 cm3 g−1 of silt loam (Ren et al. 2013), but this result differs greatly from the 28.7 cm3 g−1 (soil texture is loam) used in the research process of Hanson et al. (2006). The reasons may be that field experiments were used by Hanson et al. (2006), and numerous external factors are relevant. For example, salt may accumulate in the surface soil with water evaporation, and the solute that is absorbed by plant roots may affect the αk of K+.

Verification of the soil hydraulic and solute transport parameters

To verify the reliability of soil hydraulic and solute transport parameters determined by inversion solution, the parameters were input into HYDRUS-2D (Table 3) and the verification experiments of Nos. V9–V12 (Table 2) were simulated. The infiltration time used in the simulation process was consistent with the infiltration time of the corresponding experiment treatment. The simulation results and the measured values are shown in Figures 3 and 4.

Figure 3

Comparison between simulated and measured values of cumulative infiltration and soil water content. Note: vertical direction is the profile at the center of furrow. (a) Clay loam experiment No. V11. (b) Sandy loam experiment No. V10. (c) Vertical direction of clay loam experiment No. V12. (d) Vertical direction of sandy loam experiment No. V10.

Figure 3

Comparison between simulated and measured values of cumulative infiltration and soil water content. Note: vertical direction is the profile at the center of furrow. (a) Clay loam experiment No. V11. (b) Sandy loam experiment No. V10. (c) Vertical direction of clay loam experiment No. V12. (d) Vertical direction of sandy loam experiment No. V10.

Close modal
Figure 4

Comparison between simulated and measured values of NO3-N and K+ concentrations Note: vertical direction is the profile at the center of the furrow, and horizontal direction is the profile at the bottom of the furrow. (a) Vertical direction of clay loam experiment No. V10. (b) Horizontal direction of clay loam experiment No. V10. (c) Vertical direction of sandy loam experiment No. V11. (d) Horizontal direction of sandy loam experiment No. V11. (e) Vertical direction of clay loam experiment No. V10. (f) Vertical direction of sandy loam experiment of V11.

Figure 4

Comparison between simulated and measured values of NO3-N and K+ concentrations Note: vertical direction is the profile at the center of the furrow, and horizontal direction is the profile at the bottom of the furrow. (a) Vertical direction of clay loam experiment No. V10. (b) Horizontal direction of clay loam experiment No. V10. (c) Vertical direction of sandy loam experiment No. V11. (d) Horizontal direction of sandy loam experiment No. V11. (e) Vertical direction of clay loam experiment No. V10. (f) Vertical direction of sandy loam experiment of V11.

Close modal

The mean values of RMSE, MPBE and MBPRE of cumulative infiltration and soil water content between the measured and simulated values for the verification experiments of Nos. V9–V12 were 0.66 cm, 0.24%, 3.45%, and 0.027 cm3 cm−3, 1.04%, 6.04%, respectively (Table 4). The results indicated that the simulated cumulative infiltration and soil water content exhibited good consistency with measured values (Figure 3). And analysis of the causes of errors was that on the one hand that the soil hydraulic parameters were used to simulate verification experiments of Nos. V9–V12, these parameters by inverse solution from sandy loam and clay loam soil texture infiltration experiments of Nos. T1–T4, respectively (Tables 2 and 3), but some differences existed in h0 and θ0, resulting in errors of cumulative infiltration and soil water content between the simulated and measured experiments. On the other hand, measurement errors are inevitable during such experiments. Overall, the results indicated that the soil hydraulic parameters determined by the inversion solution are reliable and those parameters can be used to simulate the soil water movement process of furrow irrigation.

Table 4

Statistical analysis between simulated and measured values of fertilizer solution infiltration under furrow irrigation

Soil textureNo.Cumulative infiltration per unit area
Soil water content
NO3-N concentration
K+ concentration
RMSE (cm)MPBE (%)MAPRE (%)RMSE (cm3 cm−3)MPBE (%)MAPRE (%)RMSE (g cm−3)MPBE (%)MAPRE (%)RMSE (g cm−3)MPBE (%)MAPRE (%)
Clay loam V9* 0.70 −2.37 2.37 0.023 −3.56 5.85 0.053 −6.93 6.93 0.070 −5.57 7.62 
V10* 0.85 −4.12 4.12 0.026 −3.28 6.32 0.067 −7.22 9.22 0.013 −6.72 9.77 
V11* 0.74 4.57 4.57 0.032 5.23 8.24 0.049 6.38 8.78 0.025 7.23 8.91 
V12* 0.88 3.26 3.26 0.030 7.32 7.32 0.075 8.23 10.22 0.053 9.44 10.33 
Sandy loam V9* 0.66 −3.25 3.25 0.026 −3.78 5.22 0.081 −10.02 10.02 0.082 −9.36 11.65 
V10* 0.41 −3.08 3.08 0.024 −4.49 4.49 0.057 −7.52 9.75 0.093 −12.12 14.22 
V11* 0.55 5.87 5.87 0.029 7.65 7.65 0.063 9.13 11.44 0.018 9.23 12.27 
V12* 0.49 1.06 1.06 0.022 3.22 3.22 0.047 6.53 8.32 0.011 8.29 9.56 
Mean values 0.66 0.24 3.45 0.027 1.04 6.04 0.062 −0.18 9.34 0.066 0.05 10.54 
Soil textureNo.Cumulative infiltration per unit area
Soil water content
NO3-N concentration
K+ concentration
RMSE (cm)MPBE (%)MAPRE (%)RMSE (cm3 cm−3)MPBE (%)MAPRE (%)RMSE (g cm−3)MPBE (%)MAPRE (%)RMSE (g cm−3)MPBE (%)MAPRE (%)
Clay loam V9* 0.70 −2.37 2.37 0.023 −3.56 5.85 0.053 −6.93 6.93 0.070 −5.57 7.62 
V10* 0.85 −4.12 4.12 0.026 −3.28 6.32 0.067 −7.22 9.22 0.013 −6.72 9.77 
V11* 0.74 4.57 4.57 0.032 5.23 8.24 0.049 6.38 8.78 0.025 7.23 8.91 
V12* 0.88 3.26 3.26 0.030 7.32 7.32 0.075 8.23 10.22 0.053 9.44 10.33 
Sandy loam V9* 0.66 −3.25 3.25 0.026 −3.78 5.22 0.081 −10.02 10.02 0.082 −9.36 11.65 
V10* 0.41 −3.08 3.08 0.024 −4.49 4.49 0.057 −7.52 9.75 0.093 −12.12 14.22 
V11* 0.55 5.87 5.87 0.029 7.65 7.65 0.063 9.13 11.44 0.018 9.23 12.27 
V12* 0.49 1.06 1.06 0.022 3.22 3.22 0.047 6.53 8.32 0.011 8.29 9.56 
Mean values 0.66 0.24 3.45 0.027 1.04 6.04 0.062 −0.18 9.34 0.066 0.05 10.54 

Note:RMSE is the root mean square error; MPBE is the mean percentage of bias error; MAPRE is the mean absolute percentage relative error.

The simulated concentrations of NO3-N and K+ were compared with the measured values, and they agreed (Figure 4). The mean values of RMSE, MPBE and MBPRE of NO3-N and K+ concentrations between the measured and simulated values for the verification experiments of Nos. V9–V12 were 0.062 g cm−3, −0.18%, 9.34%, and 0.066 g cm−3, 0.05%, 10.54%, respectively (Table 4). The accuracy of the simulation results was slightly worse than the soil water movement simulation results, which was consistent with the research results of Ma et al. (2004) and Phillips (2006). The reasons may be that physicochemical reactions such as mineralization, nitrification, and denitrification of nitrogen were neglected in the process of NO3-N transport and parameter inversion in this study, and the effects of soil bulk density, water content, water depth, and fertilizer concentration on αk of K+ were ignored. In addition, solute transport in soil is more complicated than water movement, and this study's description of the transport of convection dispersion equation was simplified. Considering the aforementioned reasons and the actual situation of the experiments, it can be concluded that the simulation accuracy of solute transport was reasonable; thus, the solute transport parameters determined in HYDRUS-2D are relatively reliable.

Solute transport analysis in fertilizer solution infiltration

Numerical simulations were used to analyze the effect of θ0, KNO3 concentration, and h0 in NO3-N and K+ transport characteristics by HYDRUS-2D, based on inversion solution of soil hydraulic and solute transport parameters (Table 3). Because of the similarity of the distribution characteristics of NO3-N and K+ for clay loam and sandy loam, the following analysis takes clay loam as an example.

Initial soil water content

The distribution of the NO3-N and K+ concentrations of the soil wetting pattern profile at the end of infiltration are shown in Figure 5, given the following values: KNO3 concentration C = 250 mg L−1, water depth h0 = 10.5 cm, soil bulk density ρ = 1.30 g cm−3, initial water content θ0 = 0.130, 0.156, and 0.208 cm3 cm−3 of clay loam.

Figure 5

NO3-N and K+ concentration distributions under different initial soil water contents. (a) θ0= 0.130 cm3 cm−3. (b) θ0= 0.156 cm3cm−3. (c) θ0= 0.208 cm3cm−3.

Figure 5

NO3-N and K+ concentration distributions under different initial soil water contents. (a) θ0= 0.130 cm3 cm−3. (b) θ0= 0.156 cm3cm−3. (c) θ0= 0.208 cm3cm−3.

Close modal

The θ0 influences the transport characteristics of NO3-N in the wetting pattern (Figure 5). At the end of infiltration (t = 360 min), for the cases where θ0 was 0.156 and 0.208 cm3 cm−3, the vertical distribution depth of NO3-N increased by 5.28% and 13.53% compared with 0.130 cm3 cm−3, and the horizontal direction increased by 4.79% and 9.24%, respectively. The reasons may have been that the soil suction (mainly the matrix potential) decreased with the increase of θ0, which may have slowed the wetting front movement. However, compared with θs, the water shortage (θsθ0) in the soil decreased with any increase in θ0, which accelerated the wetting front movement. The aforementioned two reasons work together, which makes the soil wetting pattern distribution range increase with the increase of θ0, which is consistent with the results of Lazarovitch et al. (2009) and Nie et al. (2015). Because the adsorption of NO3-N was not considered in this study, NO3-N migration was mainly affected by soil water movement; thus, the distribution range of NO3-N in soil was consistent with the distribution of soil water (wetting pattern), and the overall distribution range of NO3-N increased with the increase of θ0. Furthermore, the results also proved that the high value region of NO3-N concentration had a downward trend with any increase of θ0. For example, the high value regions of NO3-N concentration under θ0 were 0.156 and 0.208 cm3 cm−3, moved downward by approximately 3.8 and 6.6 cm compared with 0.130 cm3 cm−3, respectively; this further confirmed that the characteristics of NO3-N easily move with soil water. Therefore, the results suggested that in the range of soil water content suitable for crop growth, fertigation should be avoided when the soil water content is high to minimize the risk that NO3-N might leach deep into the soil.

K+ mainly accumulates near the bottom of furrows (Figure 5), which indicates that θ0 has little effect on the distribution range of K+. In this study, the distribution depths of K+ are mainly between 23 and 26 cm in the vertical direction, and within 25 and 27 cm in the horizontal direction under the conditions of θ0 ranging from 0.130 to 0.208 cm3 cm−3, respectively. The reason is that the soil wetting pattern movement is accelerated with the increase of θ0, which shortens the time of colloid adsorption of K+ in the soil, so the K+ distribution range is slightly increased.

Potassium nitrate concentrations

The distributions of the NO3-N and K+ concentrations of the soil wetting pattern profile at the end of infiltration are shown in Figure 6, on the basis of the following: initial soil water content θ0 = 0.130 cm3 cm−3, water depth h0 = 10.5 cm, soil bulk density ρ = 1.30 g cm−3, KNO3 concentration C = 250, 600, and 900 mg L−1 of clay loam.

Figure 6

NO3-N and K+ concentration distributions under different KNO3 concentrations. (a) C= 250 mg L−1. (b) C= 600 mg L−1. (c) C= 900 mg L−1.

Figure 6

NO3-N and K+ concentration distributions under different KNO3 concentrations. (a) C= 250 mg L−1. (b) C= 600 mg L−1. (c) C= 900 mg L−1.

Close modal

The distribution range of NO3-N increased with the increase of KNO3 concentration (Figure 6). At the end of infiltration (t = 360 min), the vertical distribution depth of NO3-N increased by 4.37% and 8.37% with C being 600 and 900 mg L−1 compared with 250 mg L−1, and the horizontal direction increased by 5.02% and 9.17%, respectively. The results indicated that the soil infiltration capacity increases with the increase of KNO3 concentration, which is consistent with the results of Liu et al. (2017). Furthermore, it should be noted that with the increase of KNO3 concentration, the distribution range of NO3-N gradually increases, but it does not increase linearly with KNO3 concentration and peaks may exist, which requires further study. The results also showed that when the concentrations of KNO3 were 250 and 600 mg L−1, the concentration of NO3-N gradually increased along the direction of the wetting front and then decreased gradually; meanwhile, the concentration of NO3-N gradually decreased along the direction of the wetting front when C was 900 mg L−1. The reason is that the concentration of NO3-N in the solution was 153 and 368 mg L−1 when the KNO3 concentration was 250 and 600 mg L−1, both of which were lower than the initial concentration of NO3-N in the soil (496 mg L−1), so that the initial NO3-N in the soil migrated to the lower layer along with water infiltration. However, when the concentration of KNO3 was 900 mg L−1, the concentration of NO3-N in the solution was 552 mg L−1, which is higher than the initial concentration of NO3-N in the soil, making the concentration distribution of NO3-N similar to the soil water distribution, and is consistent with the results of Cote et al. (2003) and Ebrahimian et al. (2013).

The vertical distribution depth of K+ increased by only 1 cm when C was 900 mg L−1 compared with 250 mg L−1 (Figure 6); therefore, no obvious change exists in the distribution range of K+, and the water was mainly concentrated near the bottom of the furrows. The results show that the change of KNO3 concentration has little effect on the distribution range of K+. Furthermore, the K+ concentration near the furrow bottom increased obviously with the increase of KNO3 concentration. For example, when KNO3 concentration was 900 mg L−1, the K+ concentration at the bottom of the furrow increased by 248.53% compared with that at 250 mg L−1. The reason may be that the K+ concentration increases per unit volume of infiltration with the increase of KNO3 concentration, which further indicates that K+ has strong adsorption characteristics.

Water depths of furrow

The distributions of NO3-N and K+ concentrations of soil wetting pattern profiles at the end of infiltration are shown in Figure 7, on the basis of the KNO3 concentration C = 900 mg L−1, initial soil water content θ0 = 0.130 cm3 cm−3, soil bulk density ρ = 1.30 g cm−3, water depth h0 = 5.5, 10.5, and 14.5 cm of clay loam.

Figure 7

NO3-N and K+ concentration distributions under different water depths of furrow. (a) h0 = 5.5 cm. (b) h0 = 10.5 cm. (c) h0 = 14.5 cm.

Figure 7

NO3-N and K+ concentration distributions under different water depths of furrow. (a) h0 = 5.5 cm. (b) h0 = 10.5 cm. (c) h0 = 14.5 cm.

Close modal

The h0 has little effect on the vertical distribution depth of NO3-N, but it has an obvious effect in the horizontal direction (Figure 7). At the end of infiltration (t = 360 min), when h0 was 14.5 and 10.5 cm compared with 5.5 cm, the distribution range of NO3-N increased by 1.10% and 2.71% in the vertical direction, and in the horizontal direction increased by 20.48% and 34.87%, respectively. The reason may be that h0 was 5.5–14.5 cm, which causes the pressure potential change to be small, so that the difference in the vertical wetting front movement distance is small. For the horizontal direction, as h0 increased, the horizontal water surface width was increased, so that the distance between the horizontal wetting front and the center of the furrow increased, which is consistent with the results of Zhang et al. (2012). Therefore, the results suggested that h0 should be appropriately increased to enhance the horizontal distribution of NO3-N.

The influence of h0 on the K+ distribution was mainly in the horizontal direction (Figure 7). When h0 was 14.5 cm, the horizontal distribution ranges of K+ were 18.49% and 26.46% higher than for 10.5 cm and 5.5 cm, respectively. The reason is that the horizontal water surface width was increased as h0 increased, so that the distance between the horizontal wetting front and the center of the furrow increased, thereby increasing the horizontal distribution range of K+.

  • (1)

    Soil hydraulic and solute transport parameters under different potassium nitrate (KNO3) concentration conditions were determined by inversion solution and then verified in HYDRUS-2D. The results showed that the soil saturated water content (θs), empirical parameter (n), and saturated hydraulic conductivity (Ks) increase with the increase of KNO3 concentrations, but the empirical parameter (a) shows a decrease. The simulated values with HYDRUS-2D, on the basis of soil hydraulic and solute transport parameter inversion results, closely matched the measurements of cumulative infiltration, soil water content and solute transport, and the results indicated that the soil hydraulic and solute transport parameters determined from the inversion solution were reliable.

  • (2)

    The effects of initial soil water content (θ0), potassium nitrate (KNO3) concentration, and water depth (h0) on the transport characteristics of nitrate nitrogen (NO3-N) and potassium (K+) were analyzed The results proved that the distribution range of NO3-N increases with the increase of θ0 and KNO3 concentration. The h0 has little effect on the vertical distribution of NO3-N, but it has an obvious influence on the horizontal distribution, and the horizontal distribution range increases as h0 increases. K+ is mainly distributed within approximately 10 cm of the bottom of the furrow, and θ0 and the KNO3 concentration have little effect on the K+ distribution range, whereas h0 has an obvious influence on the K+ horizontal distribution, and the horizontal distribution range increases with the increase of h0.

According to the results of this study, it is suggested that h0 should be appropriately increased during furrow irrigation to increase the horizontal distribution of NO3-N. To reduce the risk of deep leaching of NO3-N, farmers should avoid fertigation when the soil water content is high in the range of suitable water contents for crop growth. Because K+ easily accumulates, the concentration of KNO3 should not be too large; if it is too high, salt can accumulate on soil surfaces. Future research will require a more suitable concentration range of KNO3 because only four concentrations were considered in this study. In addition, nitrogen mineralization, nitrification, and denitrification were neglected, which may have influenced the results of this study.

This research was supported by grants from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 51579205, 51909208), Natural Science Basic Research Program of Shaanxi (No. 2019JM-063), and Scientific Research Program by the Shaanxi Provincial Education Department (20JS099).

All relevant data are included in the paper or its Supplementary Information.

Abbasi
F.
Šimůnek
J.
Feyen
J.
van Genuchten
M. T.
Shouse
P. J.
2003
Simultaneous inverse estimation of the soil hydraulic and solute transport parameters from transient field experiments: homogeneous soil
.
Trans. ASAE
46
(
4
),
1085
1095
.
Beven
K. J.
Henderson
D. E.
Reeves
A. D.
1993
Dispersion parameters for undisturbed partially saturated soil
.
J. Hydrol.
143
,
19
43
.
Cote
C. M.
Bristow
K. L.
Charlesworth
P. B.
Cook
F. J.
Thorburn
P. J.
2003
Analysis of soil wetting and solute transport in subsurface trickle irrigation
.
Irrig. Sci.
22
(
3–4
),
143
156
.
Deb
S. K.
Sharma
P.
Shukla
M. K.
Ashigh
J.
Šimůnek
J.
2015
Numerical evaluation of nitrate distributions in the onion root zone under conventional furrow fertigation
.
J. Hydrol. Eng. ASCE
21
(
2
),
05015026
.
Ebrahimian
H.
Liaghat
A.
Parsinejad
M.
Abbasi
F.
Navabian
M.
2012a
Comparison of one- and two-dimensional models to simulate alternate and conventional furrow fertigation
.
J. Irrig. Drain. Eng. ASCE
138
(
10
),
929
938
.
Ebrahimian
H.
Liaghat
A.
Parsinejad
M.
Playán
E.
2012b
Distribution and loss of water and nitrate under alternate and conventional furrow fertigation
.
Span. J. Agric. Res.
10
(
3
),
849
863
.
Ebrahimian
H.
Liaghat
A.
Parsinejad
M.
Playán
E.
Abbasi
F.
Navabian
M.
2013
Simulation of 1D surface and 2D subsurface water flow and nitrate transport in alternate and conventional furrow fertigation
.
Irrig. Sci.
31
(
3
),
301
316
.
Feng
S.
2017
Research of Soil Hydraulic Properties and Nitrogen Conversion Parameters under the Couple of Water-Temperature-Nitrogen
.
Mater's thesis
,
Taiyuan University of Technology
,
Taiyuan
,
China
.
Grecco
K. L.
de Miranda
J. H.
Silveira
L. K.
van Genuchten
M. T.
2019
HYDRUS-2D simulations of water and potassium movement in drip irrigated tropical soil container cultivated with sugarcane
.
Agric. Water Manage.
221
,
334
347
.
Hanson
B. R.
Šimůnek
J.
Hopmans
W. H.
2006
Evaluation of urea–ammonium–nitrate fertigation with drip irrigation using numerical modeling
.
Agric. Water Manage.
86
(
1–2
),
102
113
.
Lazarovitch
N.
Warrick
A. W.
Furman
A.
Zerihun
D.
2009
Subsurface water distribution from furrows described by moment analyses
.
J. Irrig. Drain. Eng. ASCE
135
(
1
),
7
12
.
Li
J. S.
Zhang
J. J.
Rao
M. J.
2004
Effect of drip irrigation system operation on water and nitrate distribution in soil
.
J. Hydraul. Eng.
35
(
9
),
31
37
(in Chinese)
.
Li
H. X.
Wang
W. E.
Hu
X. T.
2019
Numerical simulation of soil water and nitrogen distribution under the integration of drip irrigation and fertilization
.
Agric. Res. Arid Areas
37
(
2
),
10
17
(in Chinese)
.
Liu
X. G.
Zhu
Y. F.
Yu
X. D.
Li
Y. L.
Tang
J. K.
Yu
L. M.
2017
Water-salinity distribution characteristics in wetted soil of moistube irrigation under different pressure heads and soil bulk densities
.
T. Chin. Soc. Agric. Mach.
48
(
7
),
189
197
(in Chinese)
.
Long
H. Y.
Li
Y. Z.
Jiang
Y. Z.
2001
K+ adsorption kinetics of fluvo-aquic and cinnamon soil under different K+ concentrations
.
Acta Metrol. Sin.
38
(
2
),
226
234
(in Chinese)
.
Ma
J. H.
Ren
L.
Gong
Y. S.
Stahr
K.
2004
Numerical simulation of nitrogen transport during the growth of winter wheat
.
J. Hydraul. Eng.
35
(
3
),
103
110
(in Chinese)
.
Moriasi
D. N.
Arnold
J. G.
van Liew
M. W.
Bingner
R. L.
Harmel
R. D.
Veith
T. L.
2007
Model evaluation guidelines for systematic quantification of accuracy in watershed simulations
.
Trans. ASABE
50
(
3
),
885
900
.
Nie
W. B.
Fei
L. J.
Ma
X. Y.
2015
Simplified calculating method for cumulative infiltration of furrow irrigation
.
Adv. Water Sci.
26
(
6
),
801
810
(in Chinese)
.
Nie
W. B.
Li
Y. B.
Liu
Y.
Ma
X. Y.
2018
An approximate explicit Green–Ampt infiltration model for cumulative infiltration
.
Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J.
88
(
4
),
919
930
.
Ren
C. J.
Bai
D.
Zhou
B. B.
Liang
W.
Chen
Y.
2013
Using particle swarm–finite difference algorithm to identify transport parameters of water-solute in adsorptive soil
.
Acta Metrol. Sin.
50
(
3
),
486
491
(in Chinese)
.
Šimůnek
J.
Šejna
M.
van Genuchten
M. T.
1999
The HYDRUS-2D Software Package for Simulating Water Flow and Solute Transport in Two-Dimensional Variably Saturated Media (Version 2.0)
.
US Salinity Laboratory
,
Riverside, CA, USA
.
Šimůnek
J.
van Genuchten
M. T.
2008
Modeling nonequilibrium flow and transport processes using HYDRUS
.
Vadose Zone J.
7
(
2
),
782
797
.
Verbist
K.
Cornelis
W. M.
Gabriels
D.
Alaerts
K.
Soto
G.
2009
Using an inverse modelling approach to evaluate the water retention in a simple water harvesting technique
.
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci.
13
(
10
),
1979
1992
.
Wang
C. X.
Wang
Q. J.
Liu
J. J.
Zhuang
L.
Zhen
X.
2010
Field trial for characteristics of soil water and salt distribution in drip fertigation of kalium-using fertilizers
.
Trans. CSAE
26
(
3
),
25
31
(in Chinese)
.
Wang
Z. T.
Jiao
X. Y.
Han
H. L.
Yu
X. B.
2013
Sensitivity analysis of VG model parameters with vertical one-dimensional soil infiltration
.
J. Hohai University (Natural Sciences)
41
(
1
),
80
84
(in Chinese)
.
Zerihun
D.
Furman
A.
Warrick
A. W.
Sanchez
C. A.
2005a
Coupled surface–subsurface solute transport model for irrigation borders and basins. I. Model development
.
J. Irrig. Drain. Eng. ASCE
131
(
5
),
396
406
.
Zerihun
D.
Sanchez
C. A.
Furman
A.
Warrick
A. W.
2005b
Coupled surface–subsurface solute transport model for irrigation borders and basins. II. Model evaluation
.
J. Irrig. Drain. Eng. ASCE
131
(
5
),
407
419
.
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Licence (CC BY 4.0), which permits copying, adaptation and redistribution, provided the original work is properly cited (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).