Water allocation in agricultural lands, optimal design of hydraulic structures and climatic phenomena are the events in water management science that face hydrological uncertainties. The purpose of this study is to estimate the characteristics of surface runoff based on probabilistic and fuzzy analysis. Separation and generation of basic hydrological information, probabilistic modeling, fuzzy analysis, and optimization to achieve the solution were the main steps of the decision-making problem. Long-term hydrological data of the study area were collected, analyzed and used as a basis for the simulation model. In this study, a copula-based stochastic method was developed to deal with uncertainties related to rainfall and runoff characteristics as well as to address the nonlinear dependence between multiple random variables. The relationship between rainfall variables and flood characteristics was formulated through fuzzy set theory. The feasible domain of the fuzzy problem was searched using the non-dominated sorting genetic algorithm to find the optimal extreme points. The obtained solutions were used as a fuzzy response to calculate the flood of the Baghmalek plain in Khuzestan province in southwestern Iran. The results showed that the maximum model error occurred in predicting rainfall depth and flood volume, and the maximum rainfall rate and runoff flow could be calculated more accurately. Moreover, the developed fuzzy-probabilistic model was able to predict more than 90% of flood events within the defined fuzzy range.

  • A fuzzy relationship has been developed between rainfall and runoff.

  • The proposed method is applicable to basins without hydrology stations.

  • NSGAII was incorporated in a new framework to find the extreme points.

  • Probabilistic-fuzzy model was considered as a suitable structure for estimating surface flows.

Uncertainty analysis is one of the main components in the decision-making systems of the different engineering sciences (Alam et al. 2020a, 2020b, 2020c, Yang et al. 2020a; Qayyum et al. 2020; Abedini et al. 2020; Jalali Sarvestani and Charehjou 2021; Abedini & Zhang 2021; Ouyang et al. 2021; Chen et al. 2021; Sabernezhad 2021; Rivera-Diaz et al. 2021). In hydrological problems, probabilistic planning and fuzzy programming are included as two methods of uncertainty analysis (Wang et al. 2018, 2019). Probabilistic flood estimation as an uncertainty analysis method has been used in urban, environmental landscape and dam reservoir design based on the frequency analysis of a variable in a predetermined return period (Chao et al. 2018; Zhang et al. 2019). Hydrological uncertainties in decision-making systems are evaluated as a sustainability component to increase managerial reliability. Uncertainty in the hydrological phenomena should be incorporated when there are no specific values or complete knowledge of the decision variables of a problem (Haghighi & Zahedi-Asl 2014). In recent years, uncertainty analysis of a hydrological process has been considered in different fields of water resources management in hydraulic structure design (Rahimi et al. 2020), developing groundwater strategies (Lalehzari & Kerachian 2020a), agricultural water planning (Lalehzari et al. 2020), and flood routing (Rahimi et al. 2020).

Frequency distribution functions and α-cut decomposition are two types of technique to evaluate the rate of uncertainties in hydrological problems (De Michele & Salvadori 2003; Ahmadisharaf & Kalyanapu 2019). These techniques have been defined in the probabilistic and fuzzy frameworks, respectively. Hydrological uncertainties can be analyzed using univariate, bivariate, or multivariate distribution functions and numerous studies have been carried out based on this concept (Ahmad & Simonovic 2011; Chen & Guo 2019; Rahimi et al. 2020). Probabilistic modeling has been evaluated to take into account rainfall uncertainty in the design of urban runoff control systems (Chen et al. 2021), groundwater resources and water exploitation (Lalehzari & Kerachian 2020b), estimating the soil moisture balance in root zone under drought condition (Huang et al. 2021), and energy systems (Ma et al. 2021).

Rainfall variables that reflect climatic characteristics are critical to runoff monitoring and management in agriculture (Yang et al. 2015, 2020b; Zhang et al. 2020c; Xu et al. 2021; Li et al. 2021). The main goal of this study was to develop a prediction model to provide a fuzzy-probabilistic framework for estimating the flood amounts based on the long-term rainfall in Baghmalek Plain, Khuzestan province, Iran. Rainfall characteristics including depth and rate, and flood variables of volume and maximum flow rate, have been evaluated to generate the time series of information.

Figure 1 shows the step-by-step calculation process to solve the problem. According to the figure, after analyzing the hydrological information, a bivariate probability model has been developed to predict the return periods of rainfall and runoff. The structure required to estimate the runoff fuzzy values was then programmed using multi-objective optimization.

Figure 1

Calculation steps and modeling structure.

Figure 1

Calculation steps and modeling structure.

Close modal

Probabilistic modeling

There are many probability distributions in hydrology that are fitted with different conditions and data. The Probability Density Function (PDF) and Cumulative Distribution Function (CDF) are used for probability distributions to predict random hydrological events. Univariate distribution functions can be used as marginal functions to obtain the probabilistic estimation of a hydrological variable. Some methods of fitting the best marginal distribution are Chi-square, Kolmogorov-Smirnov, and Anderson-Darling.

Overall, the steps required to determine, select, and apply a probability distribution are: considering the characteristics and constraints of the random variable; evaluating the appropriate mathematical patterns (probability density function); performing a process to fit all distributions on sample data for estimating the coefficients; goodness-of-fit test to evaluate the suitability of patterns; selecting the most appropriate distribution by considering the results of the goodness-of-fit test; incorporating the model in frequency analysis and estimating return periods.

Chi-square test

The randomness of the data and the independence of the samples are the conditions for using the Chi-square test. At first, the expected frequencies were determined using the test distribution for calculating the c2 statistic, then the critical value with the desired error level and degree of freedom n-k-1 (n = number of layers and k = number of variables) are obtained. The general Chi-square formula is presented as follows:
(1)
where, fo is the observed frequency and fe is the expected frequency. The chi-square function is obtained from the normal distribution. If the variable x belongs to the normal population with mean μ and standard deviation σ and a random sample is selected from this population, the following distribution with degree of freedom n will be obtained.
(2)
The relationship between chi-square distribution and degree of freedom k, mean k and variance 2 k is as follows:
(3)

Kolmogorov-Smirnov test

The Kolmogorov-Smirnov criterion is a test that uses a specific pattern to measure the compliance of data distribution. The Chi-square test performs well when the number of samples is large enough. Otherwise, the use of the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test is recommended. The statistic of this test is the absolute value of the difference between the expected and measured frequencies in different categories. For this test, the cumulative relative frequency of a sample for different intervals is estimated and then the absolute value of the difference between the two obtained frequencies in each range is calculated. The maximum difference obtained is known as the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test statistic (D).
(4)
where N is the number of observations; C is the hypothesized model that needs to be tested, and xi is observation in increasing order.

Anderson-Darling test

This test has better capability than Chi-square and Kolmogorov-Smirnov tests. As with other criteria, in the Anderson-Darling test, an increase in the test statistic indicates that the observed frequency distribution is far from the statistical distribution under test. The equation of the test can be expressed as follows:
(5)
Solving this equation using an approximate method is as follows:
(6)
where Ci=F(xi, α) and a is the shape parameter. Computing statistics D and A2 by Kolmogorov-Smirnov and Anderson-Darling methods, and comparing them with corresponding critical values at a certain significance level, if the statistics are less than the corresponding critical values, our hypothesis can be accepted.

Multivariate frequency function

The copula function makes it possible to combine multiple univariate distributions with known different families to construct a multivariate distribution considering the dependencies between variables. In fact, it can be said that the joint function is a cumulative distribution function that has marginal distributions of a uniform variable over the distance (1, 0). If random variables x1, …, xn follow an arbitrary marginal distribution function F1(x1), …, Fn(xn), respectively, there then exists a copula, C (), that combines these marginal distribution functions to give the joint distribution function, F(x1, …, xn) as follows (Sklar 1959):
(7)
where, ui=Fi(xi) are the functions of the cumulative distribution of continuous margins. The copula consists of various functions that must be evaluated and selected. Archimedean joint functions are part of these functions that have been used in a wide range of hydrological studies. The application of the copula in various water engineering issues is described by Chen & Guo (2019).

To identify and select the most appropriate copula function, the correlations of the variables must be determined by τ Kendall and ρ Spearman methods. In the next step, the parameter θ for the copula family c(u,v) was calculated based on the correlation coefficients.

Finally, using the maximum likelihood estimation function, the Gumbel copula was used as a joint function for estimating the multivariate probability values of rainfall. Equation (10) shows the main formulation of the Gumbel function that was used in this study. This copula was introduced by Gumbel (1960).
(8)
where, θ is a parameter of a data set (θ ≥ 1), and is calculated based on a sample of data. The value of could be estimated as follows:
(9)
Using θ, the generator of the copula function is estimated by the following equation:
(10)

Fuzzy analysis

Fuzzy structure

Rainfall characteristics were defined as fuzzy parameters, as shown in Figure 1, to estimate the flood volume and peak flow based on the predicted return periods. The extreme points of the probabilistic values of rainfall in different return periods were addressed as the feasible domain and NSGAII was implemented to find the maximum and minimum responses of the problem. Therefore, the fuzzy numbers were discretized to a = 0, a = 0.25, a = 0.5, a = 0.75, and a = 1 and the fuzzy responses were obtained based on triangular functions. In each a-cut for fuzzy analysis becomes an optimization problem to find the extreme points of the solutions as follows:
(11)

In fuzzy system optimization, the boundary responses are only required for determining the extreme points of the fuzzy domain. Figure 2 shows the framework of the fuzzy modeling using α-cut decomposition. This structure was summarized in the five levels of the fuzzy numbers to generate the flood hydrographs.

Figure 2

Fuzzy responses to the decomposition levels of the feasible domain.

Figure 2

Fuzzy responses to the decomposition levels of the feasible domain.

Close modal

Multiobjective optimization

Simulation models and intelligent algorithms were incorporated into the hydrological, environmental and agricultural problems to develop the sustainable framework (Li et al. 2017, 2019, 2020; Awan et al. 2020; Bafkar 2020; Ebadi et al. 2020; Maina et al. 2020; Medvedeva et al. 2020; Nnaemeka 2020; Nwankwo et al. 2020; Simos & Tsitouras 2020; Mohammadi 2021; Sepahvand et al. 2021). Optimization techniques are the second step after the simulation models in this structure. Originally, the non-dominated sorting concept was defined to describe the economic efficiency of individuals in a society and its application in other sciences has expanded over time (Yang et al. 2008; Sreekanth & Datta 2010; Lalehzari et al. 2020). Accordingly, the high-income limit in a society is a certain criterion that is the result of the total assets of each individual. Therefore, an increase in an individual's income occurs only if the income of other members of society is reduced. In this concept, the desired goal of each member to achieve more benefit is in conflict with the goals of other members. Therefore, if it is possible to increase an individual's income without reducing the income of others, there is a Pareto improvement. It is necessary to determine a set of points to solve the problem, which is in a predefined optimal direction. The main concept in interpreting an optimal point is Pareto optimality.

Decision-making in this method is faced with two characteristics: facing multiple and conflicting objectives and describing decision parameters with uncertainty (Lalehzari et al. 2016). Various methods are usually used to generate the optimal solution, most commonly via the application of constraints to define a feasible domain. Moreover, the optimal concept in problems with more than one objective function means finding solutions that satisfy each of the objectives to an acceptable level. Therefore, the decision-maker chooses one of the solutions according to the managerial strategy. The mathematical form of these concepts can be written as Equations (12) and (13):
(12)
(13)
Subject to:
(14)
where F is the rainfall-runoff function and Co is the constraint of o = 1, 2 intended for the optimization process. Figure 2 shows an optimal front of the solution sorted by non-dominated sorting. This mechanism requires optimization tools to find new and more suitable solutions (Lalehzari 2017). For this purpose, the genetic algorithm method could be used to run the model.
Closeness distance was incorporated to find the objective function that was the extreme points in the feasible domain. Figure 3 shows a Pareto front, solutions and the objective functions which are necessary for calculating the closeness criteria. Equation (15) could be considered as a closeness distance parameter (CDP).
(15)
where are the maximum and minimum values of the objective function o in the population, respectively, and O is the value of the objective function o in the solution i.
Figure 3

Schematic of Pareto front and the situation of solutions.

Figure 3

Schematic of Pareto front and the situation of solutions.

Close modal

The developed model was evaluated based on the long-term hydrological information (1973–2020) in Baghmalek plain. The study area is located in the eastern north of Khuzestan province has an area of approximately 62.4 km2 with geographical coordinates between 49° 39′ to 50° 11′ north longitudes and 31° 22′ to 31° 42′ east latitudes. The mean elevation of the plain is 743.5 m above sea level. Two rainfall characteristics used in this study for 42 hydrographs are illustrated in Figure 4. Furthermore, the rainfall duration for each event is shown in the outer circle of the figure. Moreover, the related flood events were considered to determine the rainfall and flood relationships. Table 1 summarizes the flood peak and volume.

Table 1

Flood characteristics estimated for 42 studied hydrographs

Event no.PeakVolumeEvent no.PeakVolumeEvent no.PeakVolume
m3/sMCMm3/sMCMm3/sMCM
310.1 44.5 15 580.9 86.4 29 605.3 64.6 
510.5 135.3 16 721.2 137.1 30 406.0 151.2 
212.9 59.2 17 641.6 117.3 31 1,441.0 259.3 
660.8 230.2 18 757.2 130.5 32 750.0 113.7 
276.0 59.7 19 245.4 50.3 33 469.2 78.2 
742.0 419.0 20 1,338.5 292.8 34 1,013.0 195.9 
95.7 18.7 21 969.0 157.5 35 542.0 106.7 
531.8 146.3 22 1,022.8 237.1 36 651.0 124.5 
645.6 95.9 23 879.8 169.9 37 658.0 263.7 
10 234.0 53.3 24 856.8 231.0 38 784 117.6 
11 300.4 86.4 25 920.6 135.0 39 376.2 64.1 
12 269.0 74.7 26 361.3 63.1 40 266.31 73.99 
13 322.8 77.3 27 323.3 69.6 41 654.19 227.85 
14 412.7 64.5 28 802.2 143.9 42 959.31 155.89 
Event no.PeakVolumeEvent no.PeakVolumeEvent no.PeakVolume
m3/sMCMm3/sMCMm3/sMCM
310.1 44.5 15 580.9 86.4 29 605.3 64.6 
510.5 135.3 16 721.2 137.1 30 406.0 151.2 
212.9 59.2 17 641.6 117.3 31 1,441.0 259.3 
660.8 230.2 18 757.2 130.5 32 750.0 113.7 
276.0 59.7 19 245.4 50.3 33 469.2 78.2 
742.0 419.0 20 1,338.5 292.8 34 1,013.0 195.9 
95.7 18.7 21 969.0 157.5 35 542.0 106.7 
531.8 146.3 22 1,022.8 237.1 36 651.0 124.5 
645.6 95.9 23 879.8 169.9 37 658.0 263.7 
10 234.0 53.3 24 856.8 231.0 38 784 117.6 
11 300.4 86.4 25 920.6 135.0 39 376.2 64.1 
12 269.0 74.7 26 361.3 63.1 40 266.31 73.99 
13 322.8 77.3 27 323.3 69.6 41 654.19 227.85 
14 412.7 64.5 28 802.2 143.9 42 959.31 155.89 
Figure 4

Details of rainfall characteristics for the evaluated hydrographs.

Figure 4

Details of rainfall characteristics for the evaluated hydrographs.

Close modal

The probabilistic framework used in this study involves the flood and precipitation information provided in daily time steps. The recorded data of 42 rainfall hydrographs (Table 1) were analyzed to formulate the flood volume and peak flow. Hydrological characteristics including peak rainfall (mm/day), cumulative rainfall depth of each hydrograph (mm), flood peak (m3/s) and flood volume (million cubic meters (MCM)) were considered from daily precipitation and flood information. The relationship between rainfall and flood characteristics based on hydrograph information is shown in Figure 5.

Figure 5

Relationship between rainfall depth and flood volume.

Figure 5

Relationship between rainfall depth and flood volume.

Close modal

The marginal frequency functions implemented in the probabilistic analysis of the rainfall peak and depth and peak flow and volume of the flood are summarized in Table 2. The results obtained by Chi-Squared, Anderson-Darling and Kolmogorov-Smirnov tests indicated that the generalized extreme values, Log Pearson, generalized extreme values, and Log-Normal functions were the best options for estimating the maximum peak (PR) and depth of rainfall (RD) and peak flow (PF) and volume of the flood (FV), respectively. The graphical illustration of the fitted curves for the four marginal distribution functions is shown in Figure 6.

Table 2

Comparison of the marginal distribution functions

Distribution functionsKolmogorov-Smirnov
Anderson-Darling
Chi-Squared
PRRDPFFVPRRDPFFVPRRDPFFV
Gamma 0.094 0.078 0.07 0.09 0.27 0.30 0.18 0.188 0.73 1.68 0.575 0.73 
Gen. Extreme Value 0.059 0.076 0.06 0.09 0.23 0.27 0.16 0.199 0.27 1.89 1.926 0.75 
Gen. Gamma 0.076 0.077 0.09 0.08 0.26 0.27 0.24 0.188 0.37 1.70 0.510 0.73 
Inv. Gaussian 0.095 0.074 0.07 0.09 0.29 0.25 0.16 0.193 0.67 1.71 0.596 0.72 
Log-Logistic 0.107 0.089 0.07 0.10 0.37 0.38 0.17 0.259 4.25 1.07 2.108 1.09 
Log-Pearson 0.081 0.069 0.07 0.09 0.24 0.21 0.17 0.186 0.36 0.61 0.598 0.72 
Lognormal 0.097 0.085 0.06 0.09 0.3 0.25 0.16 0.200 4.25 2.26 1.947 0.72 
Normal 0.090 0.076 0.11 0.10 0.44 0.26 0.56 0.698 2.38 2.03 3.907 1.75 
Weibull 0.082 0.097 0.08 0.08 0.24 0.52 0.2 0.218 0.38 1.90 0.530 1.84 
Distribution functionsKolmogorov-Smirnov
Anderson-Darling
Chi-Squared
PRRDPFFVPRRDPFFVPRRDPFFV
Gamma 0.094 0.078 0.07 0.09 0.27 0.30 0.18 0.188 0.73 1.68 0.575 0.73 
Gen. Extreme Value 0.059 0.076 0.06 0.09 0.23 0.27 0.16 0.199 0.27 1.89 1.926 0.75 
Gen. Gamma 0.076 0.077 0.09 0.08 0.26 0.27 0.24 0.188 0.37 1.70 0.510 0.73 
Inv. Gaussian 0.095 0.074 0.07 0.09 0.29 0.25 0.16 0.193 0.67 1.71 0.596 0.72 
Log-Logistic 0.107 0.089 0.07 0.10 0.37 0.38 0.17 0.259 4.25 1.07 2.108 1.09 
Log-Pearson 0.081 0.069 0.07 0.09 0.24 0.21 0.17 0.186 0.36 0.61 0.598 0.72 
Lognormal 0.097 0.085 0.06 0.09 0.3 0.25 0.16 0.200 4.25 2.26 1.947 0.72 
Normal 0.090 0.076 0.11 0.10 0.44 0.26 0.56 0.698 2.38 2.03 3.907 1.75 
Weibull 0.082 0.097 0.08 0.08 0.24 0.52 0.2 0.218 0.38 1.90 0.530 1.84 

PR, peak rainfall; RD, rainfall depth; PF, peak flood; FV, flood volume.

Figure 6

Illustrations of marginal frequency functions for rainfall and flood characteristics.

Figure 6

Illustrations of marginal frequency functions for rainfall and flood characteristics.

Close modal

To determine the correlation between precipitation and flood characteristics, τ Kendall, ρ Spearman and ρ Pearson were used. The obtained correlation coefficients are summarized in Table 3. The correlation results according to the table showed the degree of dependence between random variables, which is commonly used in cases related to detailed functions. In the next step, the maximum likelihood estimator was used to compare the copula functions, as shown in Figure 7. The joint function with the smaller MLE value was considered as the superior joint function. The results showed that the Archimedean Gumbel was better than others according to the figure.

Table 3

Comparison of correlation coefficients between rainfall and flood variables

Correlation coefficientsIndexRainfallFloodPeak values of rainfall and flood
τ Kendall  0.53 0.44 0.68 
ρ Spearman  0.63 0.56 0.81 
ρ Pearson  0.74 0.61 0.87 
Correlation coefficientsIndexRainfallFloodPeak values of rainfall and flood
τ Kendall  0.53 0.44 0.68 
ρ Spearman  0.63 0.56 0.81 
ρ Pearson  0.74 0.61 0.87 
Figure 7

Goodness-of-fit test to select the joint function.

Figure 7

Goodness-of-fit test to select the joint function.

Close modal
Application of the return period concept in hydrological studies is an essential keyword in predicting future events. Return periods can be calculated using univariate or bivariate functions. The difference between the probabilistic estimates by the marginal distribution functions and the joint functions can be expressed by the following equation:
(16)
where and are the thresholds of the rainfall depth (d) and rate (r) and is the joint cumulative distribution function of random variables of d and r. is equal to 1 for the annual data set. The values predicted by the Archimedean Gumbel function for rainfall variables are illustrated in Figure 8. The effect of joint functions showed that the values shown in the figure are greater than their equivalent values in the marginal return period. The maximum depth and rate of the predicted rainfall with a return period of 500 years in the study area were predicted to be 398 and 385 mm/day, respectively. The previous studies showed that estimation of return period using multivariate distribution functions could be effective in evaluating flood-related projects (Maurer et al. 2018; Gao et al. 2019; Salas & Obeysekera 2019).
Figure 8

Predicted rainfall variables in different return periods.

Figure 8

Predicted rainfall variables in different return periods.

Close modal

NSGAII (Deb et al. 2002) is used to identify the extreme points that are the two boundary points of the Pareto front and introduce them as fuzzy responses to the problem. The developed fuzzy triangular system for rainfall variables led to the probabilistic-fuzzy estimation of flood variables. The NSGAII optimization model searches for rainfall variables for each fuzzy space return period and calculates the extreme points of different a-cut levels. The fuzzy responses of the flood characteristics based on the different return periods of rainfall such as 5-year (a), 25-year (b), and 100-year (c) are illustrated in Figure 9. According to the developed concept, the predicted flood volume for the study area was estimated to be between 634 and 825 MCM for a 100-year return period (Figure 9(c)). This return period was recommended for reservoir dam design (Zhang et al. 2020a, 2020b). Consequently, in the 25-year return period, which is an appropriate time scale for flood diversion systems of water storage reservoirs, a flood volume of 125–164 MCM with a maximum flow of 865 m3/s has been obtained. This flood can be caused by a rainfall of 82 mm/day or a depth of 142 mm.

Figure 9

Flood fuzzy response to the rainfall variables.

Figure 9

Flood fuzzy response to the rainfall variables.

Close modal

A framework was developed to estimate the flood hydrographs in different return periods of rainfall. Fuzzy set theory and bivariate frequency distribution function were incorporated to develop the decision-making system. Probabilistic analysis of rainfall characteristics showed that the generalized extreme values and Log Pearson were fitted for the peak point and depth of rainfall, respectively. The correlation coefficient between rainfall characteristics was calculated to be 0.68. Moreover, the Gumbel Archimedean copula function was obtained as a probabilistic model for estimating return periods using MLE criteria. The calculated probabilistic values were converted to flood values using an uncertain relationship based on a-cut decomposition. The triangular fuzzy function was evaluated as a suitable option for this prediction. The results showed that the developed model can predict the characteristics of flood hydrographs especially in a return period of fewer than 100 years. Future research could consider other rainfall and flood characteristics to reduce the proposed evaluation criteria.

The Innovation Team Planning Project of Hubei (T201314).

All relevant data are included in the paper or its Supplementary Information.

Abedini
M.
&
Zhang
C.
2021
Dynamic vulnerability assessment and damage prediction of RC columns subjected to severe impulsive loading
.
Structural Engineering and Mechanics
77
,
441
461
.
doi:10.12989/sem.2021.77.4.441
.
Abedini
M.
,
Zhang
C.
,
Mehrmashhadi
J.
&
Akhlaghi
E.
2020
Comparison of ALE, LBE and pressure time history methods to evaluate extreme loading effects in RC column
.
Structures (Oxford)
28
,
456
466
.
doi:10.1016/j.istruc.2020.08.084
.
Ahmad
S. S.
&
Simonovic
S. B.
2011
A three-dimensional fuzzy methodology for flood risk analysis
.
Journal of Flood Risk Management
4
(
1
),
53
74
.
Alam
Z.
,
Sun
L.
,
Zhang
C.
,
Su
Z.
&
Samali
B.
2020a
Experimental and numerical investigation on the complex behavior of the localized seismic response in a multi-story plan-asymmetric structure
.
Structure and Infrastructure Engineering
1
17
.
doi: 10.1080/15732479.2020.1730914
.
Alam
Z.
,
Zhang
C.
&
Samali
B.
2020b
The role of viscoelastic damping on retrofitting seismic performance of asymmetric reinforced concrete structures
.
Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration
19
(
1
),
223
237
.
doi: 10.1007/s11803-020-0558-x
.
Alam
Z.
,
Zhang
C.
&
Samali
B.
2020c
Influence of seismic incident angle on response uncertainty and structural performance of tall asymmetric structure
.
The Structural Design of Tall and Special Buildings
29
(
12
),
13
35
.
doi: 10.1002/tal.1750
.
Awan
B.
,
Sabeen
M.
,
Shaheen
S.
,
Mahmood
Q.
,
Ebadi
A.
&
Toughani
M.
2020
Phytoextraction of zinc contaminated water by Tagetes minuta L
.
Central Asian Journal of Environmental Science and Technology Innovation
1
(
3
),
150
158
.
https://dx.doi.org/10.22034/CAJESTI.2020.03.04
.
Bafkar
A.
2020
Kinetic and equilibrium studies of adsorptive removal of sodium-ion onto wheat straw and rice husk wastes
.
Central Asian Journal of Environmental Science and Technology Innovation
1
(
6
).
https://dx.doi.org/10.22034/CAJESTI.2020.06.04.
Chao
L.
,
Zhang
K.
,
Li
Z.
,
Zhu
Y.
,
Wang
J.
&
Yu
Z.
2018
Geographically weighted regression based methods for merging satellite and gauge precipitation
.
Journal of Hydrology
558
,
275
289
.
doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2018.01.042
.
Chen
L.
&
Guo
S.
2019
Copulas and Its Application in Hydrology and Water Resources
.
Springer
,
Berlin
.
Chen
X.
,
Wang
D. Y.
,
Tang
J. B.
,
Ma
W. C.
&
Liu
Y.
2021
Geotechnical stability analysis considering strain softening using micro-polar continuum finite element method
.
Journal of Central South University
28
(
1
),
297
310
.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11771-021-4603-3
.
Deb
K.
,
Pratap
A.
,
Agarwal
S.
&
Meyarivan
T.
2002
A fast and elitist multi-objective genetic algorithm: NSGA-II
.
IEEE Transaction on Evolutionary Computation
6
,
181
197
.
De Michele
C.
&
Salvadori
J.
2003
A generalized Pareto intensity-duration model of storm rainfall exploiting 2-copulas
.
Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres
108
(
D2
),
111
.
Ebadi
A.
,
Toughani
M.
,
Najafi
A.
&
Babaee
M.
2020
A brief overview on current environmental issues in Iran
.
Central Asian Journal of Environmental Science and Technology Innovation
1
(
1
),
1
11
.
https://dx.doi.org/10.22034/CAJESTI.2020.01.08
.
Gao
L.
,
Zhang
L.
,
Li
X.
&
Zhou
S.
2019
Evaluating metropolitan flood coping capabilities under heavy storms
.
Journal of Hydrologic Engineering
24
(
6
),
05019011
.
Gumbel
E. J.
1960
Multivariate extreme distribution
.
Bull Int Stat Inst
39
(
2
),
471
475
.
Haghighi
A.
&
Zahedi-Asl
A.
2014
Uncertainty analysis of water supply networks using the fuzzy set theory and NSGA-II
.
Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence.
32
,
270
282
.
Huang
D.
,
Wang
J.
&
Khayatnezhad
M.
2021
Estimation of actual evapotranspiration using soil moisture balance and remote sensing
.
Iranian Journal of Science and Technology, Transactions of Civil Engineering
.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s40996-020-00575-7
.
Jalali Sarvestani
M.
&
Charehjou
P.
2021
Fullerene (C20) as a potential adsorbent and sensor for the removal and detection of picric acid contaminant: DFT Studies
.
Central Asian Journal of Environmental Science and Technology Innovation
.
https://dx.doi.org/10.22034/CAJESTI.2021.01.02.
Lalehzari
R.
2017
Closure to ‘Multi-objective management of water allocation to sustainable irrigation planning and optimal cropping pattern’
.
Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering
143
(
4
),
07016024
.
doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)IR.1943-4774.0001144
.
Lalehzari
R.
&
Kerachian
R.
2020a
An integrated framework for optimal irrigation planning under uncertainty: application of soil, water, atmosphere and plant modeling
.
Iranian Journal of Science and Technology, Transactions of Civil Engineering
45
,
429
442
.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s40996-020-00442-5
.
Lalehzari
R.
,
Boroomand-Nasab
S.
,
Moazed
H.
&
Haghighi
A.
2016
Multi-objective management of water allocation to sustainable irrigation planning and optimal cropping pattern
.
Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering
142
(
1
),
05015008
.
Lalehzari
R.
,
Boroomand Nasab
S.
,
Moazed
H.
,
Haghighi
A.
&
Yaghoobzadeh
M.
2020
Simulation-optimization modeling for water resources management using NSGAII-OIP and Modflow
.
Irrigation and Drainage
55
,
S121
S132
.
doi: 10.1002/ird.2424
.
Li
Y.
,
Jia
D.
,
Rui
Z.
,
Peng
J.
,
Fu
C.
&
Zhang
J.
2017
Evaluation method of rock brittleness based on statistical constitutive relations for rock damage
.
Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering
153
,
123
132
.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.petrol.2017.03.041
.
Li
Y.
,
Long
M.
,
Zuo
L.
,
Li
W.
&
Zhao
W.
2019
Brittleness evaluation of coal based on statistical damage and energy evolution theory
.
Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering
172
,
753
763
.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.petrol.2018.08.069
.
Li
Y.
,
Long
M.
,
Tang
J.
,
Chen
M.
&
Fu
X.
2020
A hydraulic fracture height mathematical model considering the influence of plastic region at fracture tip
.
Petroleum Exploration and Development
47
,
184
195
.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S1876-3804(20)60017-9
.
Li
A.
,
Mu
X.
,
Zhao
X.
,
Xu
J.
,
Khayatnezhad
M.
&
Lalehzari
R.
2021
Developing the non-dimensional framework for water distribution formulation to evaluate sprinkler irrigation
.
Irrigation and Drainage
.
https://doi.org/10.1002/ird.2568
.
Maina
Y.
,
Kyari
B.
&
Jimme
M.
2020
Impact of household fuel expenditure on the environment: the quest for sustainable energy in Nigeria
.
Central Asian Journal of Environmental Science and Technology Innovation
1
(
2
),
109
118
.
https://dx.doi.org/10.22034/CAJESTI.2020.02.06
.
Maurer
E. P.
,
Kayser
G.
,
Doyle
L.
&
Wood
A. W.
2018
Adjusting flood peak frequency changes to account for climate change impacts in the western United States
.
J Water Resour Plann Manage
144
(
3
),
05017025
.
Medvedeva
M. A.
,
Simos
T. E.
&
Tsitouras
C.
2020
Sixth-order, P-stable, Numerov-type methods for use at moderate accuracies. [Article; Early Access]
.
Mathematical Methods in the Applied Sciences
44
(
8
), 6923-6930
doi: 10.1002/mma.7233
.
Mohammadi
M.
2021
An in-depth study of specific pathway linked to abnormal reproductive system: a meta-analysis in a specific Caucasian ethnicity
.
Central Asian Journal of Medical and Pharmaceutical Sciences Innovation
1
(
1
),
1
7
.
https://dx.doi.org/10.22034/CAJMPSI.2021.01.01
.
Nnaemeka
A.
2020
Environmental pollution and associated health hazards to host communities (Case study: Niger delta region of Nigeria)
.
Central Asian Journal of Environmental Science and Technology Innovation
1
(
1
),
30
42
.
https://dx.doi.org/10.22034/CAJESTI.2020.01.04
.
Nwankwo
C. E.
,
Gobo
A.
,
Israel-Cookey
C. A.
&
Abere
S.
2020
Effects of hazardous waste discharge from the activities of oil and gas companies in Nigeria
.
Central Asian Journal of Environmental Science and Technology Innovation
1
(
2
),
119
129
.
https://dx.doi.org/10.22034/CAJESTI.2020.02.07
.
Ouyang
L.
,
Zhu
S.
,
Ye
K.
,
Park
C.
&
Wang
M.
2021
Robust Bayesian hierarchical modeling and inference using scale mixtures of normal distributions
.
IISE Transactions
.
doi: 10.1080/24725854.2021.1912440
.
Qayyum
S.
,
Khan
I.
,
Meng
K.
,
Zhao
Y.
&
Peng
C.
2020
A review on remediation technologies for heavy metals contaminated soil
.
Central Asian Journal of Environmental Science and Technology Innovation
1
(
1
),
21
29
.
https://dx.doi.org/10.22034/CAJESTI.2020.01.03
.
Rahimi
Y.
,
Saghafian
B.
&
Banihashemi
M. A.
2020
Hydrological and hydraulic uncertainty analysis in probabilistic design of flood diversion systems using NSGAII and bivariate frequency analysis
.
Iranian Journal of Science and Technology, Transection of Civil Engineering
.
Rivera-Diaz
A.
,
Patricia-Ortiz
A.
&
Ricardo-Delgado
D.
2021
The crucial role of estrogen/androgen hormones and their receptors in male infertility risk
.
Central Asian Journal of Medical and Pharmaceutical Sciences Innovation
1
(
1
),
35
43
.
https://dx.doi.org/10.22034/CAJMPSI.2021.01.06
.
Sabernezhad
M.
2021
Quantitative analysis of the p53 substitution mutation and breast cancer: an informative study in Iranian population
.
Central Asian Journal of Medical and Pharmaceutical Sciences Innovation
1
(
1
),
8
14
.
https://dx.doi.org/10.22034/CAJMPSI.2021.01.02
.
Salas
J. D.
&
Obeysekera
J.
2019
Probability distribution and risk of the first occurrence of k extreme hydrologic events
.
Journal of Hydrologic Engineering
24
(
10
),
04019032
.
Sepahvand
T.
,
Etemad
V.
,
Matinizade
M.
&
Shirvany
A.
2021
Symbiosis of AMF with growth modulation and antioxidant capacity of Caucasian Hackberry (Celtis Caucasica L.) seedlings under drought stress
.
Central Asian Journal of Environmental Science and Technology Innovation
2
(
1
),
20
35
.
https://dx.doi.org/10.22034/CAJESTI.2021.01.03.
Simos
T. E.
&
Tsitouras
C.
2020
Evolutionary derivation of Runge–Kutta pairs for addressing inhomogeneous linear problems
.
Numerical Algorithms
87
,
511
525
.
doi: 10.1007/s11075-020-00976-9
.
Sklar
A.
1959
Fonction de re'partition a'n dimensions et leurs marges. [Distribution functions, dimensions and margins]. Publications of the Institute of Statistics, University of Paris, Paris, France, pp. 229–231
.
Wang
B.
,
Chen
L. L.
,
Viet-Thanh
P.
&
Pham
V.
2018
New Results on Fuzzy Synchronization for a Kind of Disturbed Memristive Chaotic System
.
Complexity
2018, 3079108. doi: 10.1155/2018/3079108
.
Wang
B.
,
Chen
L. L.
,
Carlos-Arturo
L.
&
Loredo-Villalobos
C.
2019
New Results on the Control for a Kind of Uncertain Chaotic Systems Based on Fuzzy Logic
.
Complexity
2019, 8789438. doi: 10.1155/2019/8789438
.
Xu
J.
,
Li
Y.
,
Ren
C.
,
Wang
S.
,
Vanapalli
S. K.
&
Chen
G.
2021
Influence of freeze-thaw cycles on microstructure and hydraulic conductivity of saline intact loess
.
Cold Regions Science and Technology
181
,
103183
.
doi: 10.1016/j.coldregions.2020.103183
.
Yang
C. C.
,
Chang
L. C.
,
Chen
C. H.
&
Yeh
M. S.
2008
Multi-objective planning for conjunctive use of surface and subsurface water using genetic algorithm and dynamics programming
.
Water Resource Management
23
,
417
437
.
doi:10.1007/s11269-008-9281-5
.
Yang
Y.
,
Yao
J.
,
Wang
C.
,
Gao
Y.
,
Zhang
Q.
,
An
S.
&
Song
W.
2015
New pore space characterization method of shale matrix formation by considering organic and inorganic pores
.
Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering
27
,
496
503
.
doi: 10.1016/j.jngse.2015.08.017
.
Yang
Y.
,
Li
Y.
,
Yao
J.
,
Iglauer
S.
,
Luquot
L.
,
Zhang
K.
&
Wang
Z.
2020a
Dynamic pore-scale dissolution by CO2-saturated brine in carbonates: impact of homogeneous versus fractured versus vuggy pore structure
.
Water Resources Research
56
(
4
),
n/a
n/a
.
doi: 10.1029/2019WR026112
.
Yang
Y.
,
Tao
L.
,
Yang
H.
,
Iglauer
S.
,
Wang
X.
,
Askari
R.
&
Sun
H.
2020b
Stress sensitivity of fractured and vuggy carbonate: an X-Ray computed tomography analysis
.
Journal of Geophysical Research. Solid Earth
125
(
3
),
e2019JB018759
.
doi: 10.1029/2019JB018759
.
Zhang
K.
,
Wang
Q.
,
Chao
L.
,
Ye
J.
,
Li
Z.
,
Yu
Z.
&
Ju
Q.
2019
Ground observation-based analysis of soil moisture spatiotemporal variability across a humid to semi-humid transitional zone in China
.
Journal of Hydrology
574
,
903
914
.
doi: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2019.04.087
.
Zhang
F.
,
An
M.
,
Zhang
L.
,
Fang
Y.
&
Elsworth
D.
2020a
Effect of mineralogy on friction-dilation relationships for simulated faults: implications for permeability evolution in caprock faults
.
Geoscience Frontiers
2020c
,
11
(
2
),
439
450
.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gsf.2019.05.014
.
Zhang
C.
,
Gholipour
G.
&
Mousavi
A. A.
2020b
State-of-the-art review on responses of RC structures subjected to lateral impact loads
.
Archives of Computational Methods in Engineering
28
,
2477
2507
.
doi: 10.1007/s11831-020-09467-5
.
Zhang
Z.
,
Luo
C.
&
Zhao
Z.
2020c
Application of probabilistic method in maximum tsunami height prediction considering stochastic seabed topography
.
Natural Hazards
104
,
2511
2530
.
doi: 10.1007/s11069-020-04283-3
.
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Licence (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), which permits copying and redistribution for non-commercial purposes with no derivatives, provided the original work is properly cited (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).