Excessive anthropogenic activities play a significant role in the emergence and dissemination of antibiotic resistance in urban streams and river sediment. The objectives of the present study were to investigate the antibiotic susceptibility profile, molecular detection of antibiotic resistance genes (ARGs), and identification of multidrug-resistant bacterial isolates in the mainstream and tributaries of the Ghaghara River. The obtained data indicated that the majority of the isolates were identified as Bacillus spp. (40%) followed by Klebsiella quasipneumoniae (20%), Exiguobacterium undae (13.33%). Most of the bacterial isolates were resistant against penicillin G (P) (24%), cefuroxime (CXM) (20%), amoxicillin (AMX) (18%), and ampicillin (AMP) (17%) in sediments samples, whereas penicillin G (27%), cefuroxime (CXM) and erythromycin (E) was 13%, AMP and cefaclor both showed 12% in water samples respectively. This study provides insight into the prevalence of multiple antibiotic-resistant bacterial diversity in the Ghaghara River and provides the route to disseminate the multidrug-resistant pathogens in the human and animal population through the aquatic environment.

  • 16S rRNA analysis for bacterial identification and microbial study.

  • MDR bacterial community in water and sediment of Ghaghara River.

  • Bacillus species bacteria are dominant in multidrug resistance nature.

  • Penicillin and cefuroxime antibiotics showing resistance against most of bacteria.

  • ARGs like blaKPC, blaNDM, and aminoglycoside (ant3″) are dominant in all water and sediment samples.

Graphical Abstract

Graphical Abstract

Pollution aroused from antibiotics is one of the major concerns associated with severe problems in the modern era of the anxious environment (Tripathi & Tripathi 2017). After the clinical approval of penicillin to be used for human welfare, various antibiotics have been invented, and their applications are widely used for the treatment of various diseases in humans and animals (Ben et al. 2019). Due to the unregulated use of antibiotics in India, antibiotic consumption has increased approximately double in 15 years viz. from 3.2 billion defined daily doses (DDDs) in 2000 to 6.5 billion DDDs in 2015. According to a statistical record about 76 countries of the world from the year 2000 to 2015, antibiotic consumption in humans had increased by approximately 65%, which created severe problems for sustainable nature and the aquatic environment (Klein et al. 2018). Some of the antibiotics are not entirely metabolized within the body and are released to the sewage system in the form of urine and excreta. The non-metabolized antibiotics are discharged into the downstream river environments causing surface water contamination (Ramírez-Castillo et al. 2013; Kim et al. 2016; Barancheshme & Munir 2018) and are deposited in river sediments (Marathe et al. 2017) through the sewage channels (Gao et al. 2012; Xu et al. 2015; Adbarzi et al. 2020; Chen et al. 2020), landfill leachates (Anand et al. 2021), farmyard manure (Zalewska et al. 2021) as well as industrial and agricultural wastewater (Gatica et al. 2016). The excess concentration of antibiotics provides a favourable condition for development and is considered as the most significant driver of antibiotic resistance (Samreen et al. 2021). Previous literature has reported that the urban stretches of rivers are disposed to receive contaminants from numerous pollution sources viz. industrial, chemical, clinical, agricultural, household, and treated or untreated wastewater from wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs) (Bengtsson-Palme et al. 2019; Ram & Kumar 2020; Hubeny et al. 2021). WWTPs are the machinery setup considered to reduce the bacterial and antibiotic resistance genes (ARGs) load from wastewater but, due to the technical limitations, some parts of the antibiotics, antibiotic-resistant bacteria (ARB), and ARGs are leftover in effluent water and released into the downstream receiving water bodies (Alexander et al. 2020; Su et al. 2020; Mahaney & Franklin 2022). The most abundant ARG subtypes, previously reported in the surface water system, majorly covered eight antibiotic families that are β-lactam (bla), sulfonamide (sul), tetracycline (tet), aminoglycoside (aad), multidrug (mec), amphenicol (flo), trimethoprim (dfr), and glycopeptide (van) (Kock et al. 2018; Su et al. 2020). Urban rivers are very prone and act as reservoirs of ARB and ARGs (Jia et al. 2018; Sabri et al. 2020). There is serious attention on the regulation of antibiotics by many international agencies about the contamination of surface water with antibiotics along with ARB causing serious pathogenic diseases worldwide (WHO 2018).

The Ghaghara River is the largest tributary of the Ganga River in terms of annual flow contribution. The mainstream of Ghaghara River connects with the Ganga River near the Doriganj area in Chhapara district of Bihar state, after a journey of about 1,080 km (Ravi et al. 2021). The Ghaghara plains lie beneath the thick loose muddy sediments deposited by the Ghaghara River and its tributaries. The Ghaghara sub-basin comprises Pleistocene older alluvial deposit (Varanasi older alluvium and T2 terrace surface) and Holocene newer alluvial deposit (Bangar and Khadar). The older alluvium is characterized by different lithologies such as kankar, gravel, sand, silt, and clay (Singh et al. 2005). There are five densely populated towns between 1 and 10 lakhs in the Ghaghara basin of the Indian region, viz. Bahraich, Basti, Faizabad, Gonda, and Lakhimpur Kheri. As per census 2011, the basin shelters the total population of 25,864,960, amongst which 2,083,813 (8.06%) is urban and 23,781,147 (91.94%) belongs to the rural population. However, the wastewater generated by the rural and urban population residing in the 570 km stretch of present study area is treated by approximately nine WWTPs located near the banks the of Ghaghara River (Jain et al. 2007). Ultimately after the treatment process, the treated wastewater is discharged into the Ghaghara River, which serves as a point source of downstream contamination. Also, some open drainage and sewage are discharged into the river which are non-point source of contamination.

This study aims to evaluate the resistance pattern of 208 isolates from Ghaghara River water and alluvial sediment from the upper, middle, and lower stretch of Ghaghara River against the antibiotics of different classes. Also, the isolates were screened for the genes encoding for ß-lactams (blaKPC, blaNDM, blaTEM), tetracycline (tetM), quinolone (qnrS), aminoglycosides (ant2″, ant3″), chloramphenicol (cmlA) and sulphonamides (sul3) resistance. Furthermore, the bacterial DNA was used to identify particular bacteria by Sanger sequencing. The comprehensive study at the microbial level and antibiotic resistance profile have not been previously analysed and reported; Therefore, this study holds high significance to explore the microbial and antibiotic resistance load in the Ghaghara River.

Study area and sample collection

In the present study, water and sediment samples were collected from major tributaries of Ghaghara, which are Geruwa, Sharda, Kuwano, Rapti, and Chhoti Gandak of the left bank located in the Indian region. River water samples (n = 14) were collected in acid-cleaned polyethylene bottles, and sediment samples were collected in sediment containers from 14 different locations of the Ghaghara River and its tributaries during the 1–10 September 2020 (Figure 1). All these 14 sampling locations were distributed in the upstream, midstream, and downstream sections of the main course of the Ghaghara and connecting tributaries (Table 1).
Table 1

Sampling stations detail including latitude and longitude and district administration information

Stream flowCodeSampling stationRiverAdministrationLatitudeLongitude
Upper stream S1 Kartania-ghat Geruwa Bahraich 28.20 81.07 
S2 Girijapuri barrage Geruwa + Kauriala Bahraich 28.16 81.05 
S3 Sitapur Sharda river Bahraich 27.69 81.49 
S4 Chahlari bridge Ghaghara + Sharda Bahraich 27.54 81.34 
Middle stream S5 Jarwal road Ghaghara Bahraich 27.05 81.29 
S6 Ayodhya ghat Saryu Ayodhya 26.61 82.21 
S7 Pausara ghat Ghaghara Ayodhya 26.64 82.41 
S8 Hanuman garhi, Tanda Ghaghara Ambedkar Nagar 26.56 82.66 
S9 Dhanghata, SKN Ghaghara Sant Kabir Nagar 26.49 82.98 
Lower stream S10 Kuwano Kuwano Sant Kabir Nagar 26.6 83.02 
S11 Rajghat, Gorakhpur Rapti Gorakhpur 26.73 83.35 
S12 Jalpa mata mandir, Bhatni, Chhoti Gandak Deoria 26.38 83.94 
S13 Manjhi-ghat, Chhapara Ghaghara Chhapara 25.83 84.58 
S14 Doriganj, Chhapara Ghaghara + Ganga Chhapara 25.73 84.83 
Stream flowCodeSampling stationRiverAdministrationLatitudeLongitude
Upper stream S1 Kartania-ghat Geruwa Bahraich 28.20 81.07 
S2 Girijapuri barrage Geruwa + Kauriala Bahraich 28.16 81.05 
S3 Sitapur Sharda river Bahraich 27.69 81.49 
S4 Chahlari bridge Ghaghara + Sharda Bahraich 27.54 81.34 
Middle stream S5 Jarwal road Ghaghara Bahraich 27.05 81.29 
S6 Ayodhya ghat Saryu Ayodhya 26.61 82.21 
S7 Pausara ghat Ghaghara Ayodhya 26.64 82.41 
S8 Hanuman garhi, Tanda Ghaghara Ambedkar Nagar 26.56 82.66 
S9 Dhanghata, SKN Ghaghara Sant Kabir Nagar 26.49 82.98 
Lower stream S10 Kuwano Kuwano Sant Kabir Nagar 26.6 83.02 
S11 Rajghat, Gorakhpur Rapti Gorakhpur 26.73 83.35 
S12 Jalpa mata mandir, Bhatni, Chhoti Gandak Deoria 26.38 83.94 
S13 Manjhi-ghat, Chhapara Ghaghara Chhapara 25.83 84.58 
S14 Doriganj, Chhapara Ghaghara + Ganga Chhapara 25.73 84.83 
Figure 1

Sampling stations in Ghaghara and its major tributaries.

Figure 1

Sampling stations in Ghaghara and its major tributaries.

Close modal

The basic parameters of pH, EC, TDS, DO, BOD, stream velocity and river depth as well as nutrients chemistry of NH4-N, NO3-N, and PO4-P(μg/l) were analysed and have been reported in our previous study Ravi et al. (2021).

Isolation and purification of bacterial isolates

Isolation and purification of bacterial isolates from river water and sediments were done using the serial dilution agar plate method (Aneja 2018). A total amount of 100 ml water sample was serially diluted (1:10) with 0.85% normal saline and spread on Luria Bertani (LB) Agar medium and incubated at 37 °C overnight. The well grown and distinct morphological bacterial colonies were selected from each plate for further antibiotic disc diffusion analysis.

Antibiotics susceptibility test

In the present study, the Kirby-Bauer test was applied in which discs of antibiotics with standard concentrations are diffused onto the surface of Mueller Hinton Agar (MHA) plates containing the dense lawn of individual bacterial strain and placed in the incubator for 24 h at 37 °C. The following antibiotics discs (Himedia) and disc potencies were used ampicillin (AMP) (25MCG), azithromycin (AZM) (30MCG), cefaclor (CF) (30MCG), ciprofloxacin (CIP) (25MCG), cefadroxil (CFR) (30MCG), erythromycin (E) (15MCG), cefotaxime (CTX) (5MCG), cefuroxime (CXM) (30MCG), penicillin G (P) (2MCG) and amoxicillin (AMX) (30MCG). The inhibition zone diameter was measured after the plates were cultured for 16–18 h at 37 °C.

Isolation of DNA, 16S rRNA amplification, and DNA sequencing

The 15 bacterial isolates were selected for the DNA isolation based on multidrug resistance against more than five antibiotics. A total of 1.5 ml of overnight grown bacterial culture was used for DNA isolation based on the phenol/chloroform method (He F 2011). The bacterial 16S rRNA gene from all isolated DNA samples was amplified using a conventional PCR system in a BioRad thermocycler with 16S rRNA universal primers (27F-1492R). The PCR mixture for a 50 μl reaction volume consisted of total PCR mastermix (GCC Biotech India Pvt. Ltd), forward and reverse primer, and the final required volume of 50 μl was completed by adding PCR water with 2 μl template DNA. Polymerase chain reaction conditions consisted of an initial denaturation at 94 °C for 3 min followed by 35 cycles of denaturation at 94 °C for 30 s, the annealing temperature of primers was 60 °C for 30 s and extension at 72 °C for 1 min and final extension at 72 °C for 5 min and infinite hold at 4 °C.

PCR based confirmation of ARGs

PCR amplification was carried out against nine ARGs with community DNA for water and sediment samples. The bacterial community DNA from river water and sediment samples were isolated using the MP biomedical FastDNA Spin Kit. In water and sediment samples, the prevalence of targeted ARGs including blaKPC, blaNDM, blaTEM, tetM, ant2, ant-3, qnrS, cmlA, and sul3, was determined using water and sediment in the conventional PCR system. The ARGs were analysed using a specific primer set, and the annealing temperature is listed in Table 2.

Table 2

Primers used in this study to amplify antibiotic-resistant genes

S.N.PrimerSequenceAnnealing temp. (°C)Product sizeReference
blaKPC CATTCAAGGGCTTTCTTGCTGC 51 538 Nass et al. (2008)  
ACGACGGCATAGTCATTTGC 
blaNDM GGGCAGTCGCTTCCAACGGT 51 476 Yong et al. (2009)  
GTAGTGCTCAGTGTCGGCAT 
blaTEM ATAAAATTCTTGAAGACGAAA 50 1076 Ahmed et al. (2007)  
GACAGTTACCAATGCTTAATC 
tetM GTGGACAAAGGTACAACGAG 55 406 NG et al. (2001)  
CGGTAAAGTTCGTCACACAC 
ant-2 ATGGACACAACGCAGGTCAC 59 534 Vakulenko & Mobashery (2003)  
TTAGGCCGCATATCGCGACC 
ant-3 GTGGATGGCGGCCTGAAGCC 68 529 Vakulenko & Mobashery (2003)  
AATGCCCAGTCGGCAGCG 
qnrS GCAAGTTCATTGAACAGGGT  427 Cattoir et al. (2007)  
TCTAAACCGTCGAGTTCGGCG 
cmlA TACTCGGATCCATGCTGGCC 50 578 Obayiuwana et al. (2021)  
TCCTCGAAGAGCGCCATTGG 
sul3 GAGCAAGATTTTTGGAATCG 53 789 Boerlin et al. (2005)  
CATCTGCAGCTAACCTAGGGCTTTGGA 
S.N.PrimerSequenceAnnealing temp. (°C)Product sizeReference
blaKPC CATTCAAGGGCTTTCTTGCTGC 51 538 Nass et al. (2008)  
ACGACGGCATAGTCATTTGC 
blaNDM GGGCAGTCGCTTCCAACGGT 51 476 Yong et al. (2009)  
GTAGTGCTCAGTGTCGGCAT 
blaTEM ATAAAATTCTTGAAGACGAAA 50 1076 Ahmed et al. (2007)  
GACAGTTACCAATGCTTAATC 
tetM GTGGACAAAGGTACAACGAG 55 406 NG et al. (2001)  
CGGTAAAGTTCGTCACACAC 
ant-2 ATGGACACAACGCAGGTCAC 59 534 Vakulenko & Mobashery (2003)  
TTAGGCCGCATATCGCGACC 
ant-3 GTGGATGGCGGCCTGAAGCC 68 529 Vakulenko & Mobashery (2003)  
AATGCCCAGTCGGCAGCG 
qnrS GCAAGTTCATTGAACAGGGT  427 Cattoir et al. (2007)  
TCTAAACCGTCGAGTTCGGCG 
cmlA TACTCGGATCCATGCTGGCC 50 578 Obayiuwana et al. (2021)  
TCCTCGAAGAGCGCCATTGG 
sul3 GAGCAAGATTTTTGGAATCG 53 789 Boerlin et al. (2005)  
CATCTGCAGCTAACCTAGGGCTTTGGA 

Isolation and purification of bacteria and their antibiotic susceptibility

In total, 109 bacterial isolates on the different morphological significance were isolated from the water sample, and 99 were from sediment samples on LB Agar media for further analysis using the Antibiotic Sensitivity Test (AST). The antibiotic susceptibility of all selected isolates was measured by the disc diffusion method (CLSI 2020) against 10 antibiotics of various groups. In water samples, 38% (42/109) of the isolates were resistant to at least one antibiotic; 12.84% (14/109) were resistant to two antibiotics, and 35.7% (39/109) were multidrug resistant (Figure 2). In total, 90 isolates (82.56%) were resistant to penicillin. The second most prevalent antibiotic resistance was toward erythromycin (27.27%, 32/109 isolates), followed by cefaclor (23.85%, 26/109 isolates), cefuroxime (23.85%, 26/109 isolates), ampicillin (17.43%, 19/109 isolates), amoxicillin (15.59%, 17/109 isolates), ciprofloxacin (15.59%, 19/109 isolates) and cefadroxil (14.67%, 16/109). Few isolates (4.58%; 5/109) had resistance toward aztreonam (Figure 2). However, in sediment samples, 31.31% (31/99) of the isolates were resistant to at least one antibiotic; 23.23% (23/99) were resistant to two antibiotics, and 29.29% (29/99) were multidrug resistant (Figure 3). In total, 78 isolates (78.78%) isolates were resistant to penicillin G. The second most prevalent antibiotic resistance was toward cefadroxil (27.27%, 27/99 isolates), followed by amoxicillin (21.21%, 21/99 isolates), cefuroxime (21.21%, 21/99 isolates), ampicillin (20.20%, 20/99 isolates), cefaclor (14.14%, 14/99 isolates), ciprofloxacin (13.13%, 13/99 isolates) and erythromycin (13.13%, 13/99). Few isolates (3.03%; 3/99) had resistance toward aztreonam (Figure 3).
Figure 2

Percentage contribution of multidrug-resistant bacteria isolated from water samples of different collection sites (S1–S14) of Ghaghra River (where N0–N9 represents the number of antibiotics).

Figure 2

Percentage contribution of multidrug-resistant bacteria isolated from water samples of different collection sites (S1–S14) of Ghaghra River (where N0–N9 represents the number of antibiotics).

Close modal
Figure 3

Percentage contribution of multidrug-resistant bacteria isolated from sediment samples of different collection sites (S1–S14) of Ghaghara River (where N0–N9 represents the number of antibiotics).

Figure 3

Percentage contribution of multidrug-resistant bacteria isolated from sediment samples of different collection sites (S1–S14) of Ghaghara River (where N0–N9 represents the number of antibiotics).

Close modal
Among isolates with a multi-resistant phenotype, 1.7% (3/109) was resistant to eight antibiotics; 5.5% (6/109) were resistant to seven antibiotics; 1.0% (1/99) were resistant to six antibiotics, 2.7% (3/109) were resistant to five antibiotics, 9.2% (10/109) were resistant to four antibiotics, and 12.8 (14/109) were resistant to three antibiotics in water samples (Figure 4). However, in sediment samples, 1.0% (1/99) was resistant to nine antibiotics; 1.0% (1/99) was resistant to eight antibiotics; 2.0% (2/99) were resistant to seven antibiotics, 2.0% (2/99) were resistant to six antibiotics, 9.0% (9/99) were resistant to five and four antibiotics, and 8.0 (8/99) were resistant to three antibiotics (Figure 5). These antibiotics are first, second, and third-generation and are widely used in the Indian subcontinent in the treatment of respiratory tract infection, Urinary tract infection, rheumatic fever, and heart diseases. Furthermore, 78 strains in sediment and 90 strains in water were penicillin resistant which were found in the sample location near to agriculture, urban and industrial area. The observation of higher resistance in sediment samples is because the riverine sediments are static for a long time. When compared to all section of Ghaghara River, surprisingly, the midstream (S5, S6, S7, S8, S9) revealed higher proportions of resistant bacteria than upstream (S1, S2, S3, S4), and lower stream (S10, S11, S12, S13, S14) sampling points (Figures 4 and 5). Bacterial resistance against β-lactam antibiotics is growing substantially and has developed general problems in primary care drugs. These drugs are vigorous against many Gram-positive, Gram-negative, and anaerobic organisms and are prescribed and administered as a general practice for the frontline bacterial infections.
Figure 4

Percentage contribution of different level of antibiotic resistance of different bacterial isolates isolated from water samples of the Ghaghara River. The bar diagram exhibits the percentage of different class of antibiotic resistance (i.e., resistant, intermediate, and susceptible).

Figure 4

Percentage contribution of different level of antibiotic resistance of different bacterial isolates isolated from water samples of the Ghaghara River. The bar diagram exhibits the percentage of different class of antibiotic resistance (i.e., resistant, intermediate, and susceptible).

Close modal
Figure 5

Percentage contribution of different levels of antibiotic resistance of different bacterial isolates isolated from sediment samples from the Ghaghara River. The bar diagram exhibits the percentage of different classes of antibiotic resistance (i.e., resistant, intermediate, and susceptible).

Figure 5

Percentage contribution of different levels of antibiotic resistance of different bacterial isolates isolated from sediment samples from the Ghaghara River. The bar diagram exhibits the percentage of different classes of antibiotic resistance (i.e., resistant, intermediate, and susceptible).

Close modal
Figure 6

Graphical representation for genotypic profiling of antibiotic resistance for the water samples collected from all the sample collection sites. This figure reveals the maximum dominance of the ant3” gene (92.85%) followed by blaNDM (64.28 %), ant2 (50.0 %), blaKPC (42.85 %), qnrS (35.71 %), tetM (28.57 %), sul1 (21.42 %), cmlA (7.69 %) and blaTEM (7.69 %) amongst all the sampling sites.

Figure 6

Graphical representation for genotypic profiling of antibiotic resistance for the water samples collected from all the sample collection sites. This figure reveals the maximum dominance of the ant3” gene (92.85%) followed by blaNDM (64.28 %), ant2 (50.0 %), blaKPC (42.85 %), qnrS (35.71 %), tetM (28.57 %), sul1 (21.42 %), cmlA (7.69 %) and blaTEM (7.69 %) amongst all the sampling sites.

Close modal
Figure 7

Graphical representation for genotypic profiling of antibiotic resistance for the Sediment Samples collected from all the sample collection sites. This figure reveals the maximum dominance of the ant3” gene (92.85%) and blaNDM (92.85%), followed by blaKPC (71.42 %), ant2 (21.42 %), tetM (21.42 %), sul3 (21.42 %), and qnrS (14.28 %). However, in sediment samples, no resistance was found against cmlA and blaTEM amongst all the sampling sites.

Figure 7

Graphical representation for genotypic profiling of antibiotic resistance for the Sediment Samples collected from all the sample collection sites. This figure reveals the maximum dominance of the ant3” gene (92.85%) and blaNDM (92.85%), followed by blaKPC (71.42 %), ant2 (21.42 %), tetM (21.42 %), sul3 (21.42 %), and qnrS (14.28 %). However, in sediment samples, no resistance was found against cmlA and blaTEM amongst all the sampling sites.

Close modal

The maximum resistance was recorded against the genes encoding for ß-lactams, i.e. blaKPC, blaNDM, and aminoglycoside (ant3″) in almost all water and sediment samples collection sites, however few samples have shown resistance against blaTEM, qnrS, and sul3 (Figures 6 and 7). In water samples, the most frequent antimicrobial resistance genes were ant3 (13/14), blaNDM (9/14) ant2 (7/14), blaKPC (6/14), qnrS (5/14), tetM (4/14), and sul1 (3/14) (Figure 6). However, in sediment samples, the most dominating antimicrobial resistance genes were ant3 (13/14), blaNDM (13/14), blaKPC (10/14), ant2 (3/14), tetM (3/14), sul1 (3/14) and qnrS (2/14) (Figure 7). The AST observations can support the obtained data as the maximum bacterial isolates were resistant to β-lactam antibiotics. The blaNDM, blaKPC, and ant3 combination was observed in four bacterial isolates of sediment samples and nine isolates of water samples (Figure 6). The bacterial isolates of water and sediment samples of S4 and S8 sites were shown to be resistant against nearly all the ARGs used in this study (Figure 7). A higher concentration of ARGs was found in the midstream of Ghaghara River than the upper and downstream regions.

The multidrug-resistant bacterial isolates showing resistance against more than five antibiotics were selected for 16S rRNA amplification and sequence analysis considering their enhanced potential to pose a severe threat to human health aspects and environmental contamination. It was observed that the bacterial isolates from the sampling site of Chahlari bridge in Bahraich district have shown maximum MDR and were identified as K. quasipneumoniae, B. marisflavi, and Exiguobacterium undae. Prevalence of Klebsiella quasipneumoniae showing resistance against nine antibiotics and seven antibiotics respectively was found in both water and sediment, causing pneumonia and bloodstream infections (Table 3). Various non-pathogenic species of Bacillus, including B. thuringiensis, B. subtilis, B. gaemokensis, B. pseudomycoides, B. subtilis were detected at different sampling sites, E. coli at S1, Exiguobacterium undae at S4, and Exiguobacterium sp. AT1b at S12. Identified plant pathogen were Pseudomonas corrugata at S7, Aeromonas caviae at S8, and Priestia aryabhattai in water samples of sampling site 12 (Table 3). The majority of the detected bacterial species were non-pathogenic, whereas detection of species like B. thuringiensis and Klebsiella quasipneumoniae is a matter of serious concern to public health (Table 3).

Table 3

Multidrug resistance (MDR) bacteria isolated and confirmed by genome sequencing with comparative similarity of database (sampling code W represents water sample and Sed represents sediment samples)

S.N.Sampling codeScientific nameResistant to no. of antibioticsLengthSimilarity %Accession
1. S1W2 Escherichia coli ATCC 8739 06 2,519 100 CP022959.1 
2. S1W10 Bacillus subtilis 07 2,512 99 MT641205.1 
3. S4Sed20 Klebsiella quasipneumoniae 09 2,290 100 CP045641.1 
 S4W26 Exiguobacterium undae 07 2,560 98 KY230508.1 
 S4W28 Bacillus marisflavi 07 2,429 99 CP047095.1 
 S4W29 Klebsiella quasipneumoniae 07 2,484 100 CP035207.1 
4. S7W48 Pseudomonas corrugata 06 2,468 100 CP014262.1 
5. S8Sed47 Bacillus thuringiensis 05 2,551 100 CP053938.1 
 S8W61 Aeromonas caviae 05 2,545 100 AP019195.1 
6. S11W71 Bacillus subtilis 07 2,508 100 MT110999.1 
 S11Sed69 Exiguobacterium sp. AT1b 05 2,082 100 CP001615.1 
7. S12Sed81 Bacillus gaemokensis 05 2,518 100 JN999841.1 
 S12W90 Klebsiella quasipneumoniae 06 2,542 100 CP035207.1 
 S12Sed94 Priestia aryabhattai 09 2,514 99 CP072473.1 
8. S14Sed97 Bacillus pseudomycoides 05 2,536 100 MK537370.1 
S.N.Sampling codeScientific nameResistant to no. of antibioticsLengthSimilarity %Accession
1. S1W2 Escherichia coli ATCC 8739 06 2,519 100 CP022959.1 
2. S1W10 Bacillus subtilis 07 2,512 99 MT641205.1 
3. S4Sed20 Klebsiella quasipneumoniae 09 2,290 100 CP045641.1 
 S4W26 Exiguobacterium undae 07 2,560 98 KY230508.1 
 S4W28 Bacillus marisflavi 07 2,429 99 CP047095.1 
 S4W29 Klebsiella quasipneumoniae 07 2,484 100 CP035207.1 
4. S7W48 Pseudomonas corrugata 06 2,468 100 CP014262.1 
5. S8Sed47 Bacillus thuringiensis 05 2,551 100 CP053938.1 
 S8W61 Aeromonas caviae 05 2,545 100 AP019195.1 
6. S11W71 Bacillus subtilis 07 2,508 100 MT110999.1 
 S11Sed69 Exiguobacterium sp. AT1b 05 2,082 100 CP001615.1 
7. S12Sed81 Bacillus gaemokensis 05 2,518 100 JN999841.1 
 S12W90 Klebsiella quasipneumoniae 06 2,542 100 CP035207.1 
 S12Sed94 Priestia aryabhattai 09 2,514 99 CP072473.1 
8. S14Sed97 Bacillus pseudomycoides 05 2,536 100 MK537370.1 

These bacterial isolates are generally found in the wastewater environment and effluents from households and grow in the saline environment and high pH environment. Therefore, it is indicated that these bacterial isolates were transferred from wastewater to the river system. Most of the bacterial isolates from this river system showed resistance against penicillin G (P), cefuroxime (CXM), and amoxicillin (AMX). The Bacillus sp. is highly prevalent in household sewerage, wastewater, and sediment/water samples of the Ghaghara and major tributaries.

According to these results, most isolated bacterial strains are resistant to antibiotics commonly used in medical practices, such as penicillin G, cefuroxime, and amoxicillin. 16S rRNA analysis for bacterial identification and microbial study in the river Ghaghara has been performed for the first time in this study. The data obtained in the present study provide an overview of the prevalence and abundance of multidrug-resistant bacteria at many sampling sites of the Ghaghara River. Additionally, the results provide the information to understand the risks associated with the prevalence of antibiotics pollution in the aquatic environment and its effects on other environmental compartments. The opportunistic human pathogenic Klebsiella quasipneumoniae in water and sediment samples were resistant against ß-lactam antibiotics and contained diverse carbapenem resistance genes. Finally, further research is needed to evaluate the risks of antibiotic pollution in the downstream river environment and improve the efficiency and technologies implemented in the wastewater treatment plant.

The authors thank Atul Srivastava for the study area map preparation. The authors thank the University of Allahabad, Prayagraj, and Sam Higginbottom University of Agriculture, Technology and Sciences, Prayagraj, for providing the necessary facilities. The authors thank UGC for providing a Rajiv Gandhi National Fellowship (RGNF) to Nirdesh Kumar Ravi.

Pawan Kumar Jha thanks the University Grant Commission (UGC), India, for providing funding (No. F.30-373/2017(BSR)) for research work presented in this paper.

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals.

The authors approved the participation.

The authors approved for the publication.

VT and PJ conceived the research. NKR, RS, and VT wrote the manuscript. NKR AKP and RS performed the experiments. VT, PT and PJ edited the manuscript. PT and AS contributed to sampling and data analysis. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

All relevant data are included in the paper or its Supplementary Information.

The authors declare there is no conflict.

Ahmed
A. M.
,
Motoi
Y.
,
Sato
M.
,
Maruyama
A.
,
Watanabe
H.
,
Fukumoto
Y.
&
Shimamoto
T.
2007
Zoo animals as reservoirs of gram-negative bacteria harboring integrons and antimicrobial resistance genes
.
Applied and Environmental Microbiology
73
,
6686
6690
.
https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.01054-07
.
Alexander
J.
,
Hembach
N.
&
Schwartz
T.
2020
Evaluation of antibiotic resistance dissemination by wastewater treatment plant effluents with different catchment areas in Germany
.
Scientific Reports
10
,
8952
.
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-65635-4
.
Anand
U.
,
Reddy
B.
,
Singh
V. K.
,
Singh
A. K.
,
Kesari
K. K.
,
Tripathi
P.
,
Kumar
P.
,
Tripathi
V.
&
Simal-Gandara
J.
2021
Potential environmental and human health risks caused by antibiotic-resistant bacteria (ARB), antibiotic resistance genes (ARGs) and emerging ccontaminants (ECs) from municipal solid waste (MSW) landfill
.
Antibiotics
10
(
4
),
374
.
http://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics10040374
.
Aneja
K. R.
2018
Experiments in Microbiology Plant Pathology Tissue Culture & Microbial Biotechnology
.
New Age International Publishers
,
New Dehli
, pp.
154
-
158
.
Barancheshme
F.
&
Munir
M.
2018
Strategies to combat antibiotic resistance in the wastewater treatment plants
.
Frontiers in Microbiology
17
(
8
),
2603
.
http://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2017.02603
.
Ben
Y.
,
Fu
C.
,
Hu
M.
,
Liu
L.
,
Wong
M. H.
&
Zheng
C.
2019
Human health risk assessment of antibiotic resistance associated with antibiotic residues in the environment: a review
.
Environmental Research
169
,
483
493
.
http://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2018.11.040
.
Bengtsson-Palme
J.
,
Milakovic
M.
,
Švecová
H.
,
Ganjto
M.
,
Jonsson
V.
,
Grabic
R.
&
Udikovic-Kolic
N.
2019
Industrial wastewater treatment plant enriches antibiotic resistance genes and alters the structure of microbial communities
.
Water Research
162
,
437
445
.
http://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2019.06.073
.
Boerlin
P.
,
Travis
R.
,
Gyles
C. L.
,
Reid-Smith
R.
,
Heather Lim
N. J.
,
Nicholson
V.
,
McEwen
S. A.
,
Friendship
R.
&
Archambault
M.
2005
Antimicrobial resistance and virulence genes of Escherichia coli isolates from swine in Ontario
.
Applied Environmental Microbiology
71
(
11
),
6753
6761
.
http://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.71.11.6753-6761.2005
.
Cattoir
V.
,
Poirel
L.
,
Rotimi
V.
,
Soussy
C. J.
&
Nordmann
P.
2007
Multiplex PCR for detection of plasmid-mediated quinolone resistance qnr genes in ESBL-producing enterobacterial isolates
.
Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy
60
(
2
),
394
397
.
http://doi.org/10.1093/jac/dkm204
.
Chen
H.
,
Li
Y.
,
Sun
W.
,
Song
L.
,
Zuo
R.
&
Teng
Y.
2020
Characterization and source identification of antibiotic resistance genes in the sediments of an interconnected river-lake system
.
Environment International
137
,
105538
.
http://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2020.105538
.
CLSI
2020
Performance Standards for Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing. 30th ed. CLSI supplement M100. Wayne, PA: Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute; 2020
.
Gao
P.
,
Munir
M.
&
Xagoraraki
I.
2012
Correlation of tetracycline and sulfonamide antibiotics with corresponding resistance genes and resistant bacteria in a conventional municipal wastewater treatment plant
.
Science of the Total Environment
421–422
,
173
183
.
http://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2012.01.061
.
Gatica
J.
,
Tripathi
V.
,
Green
S.
,
Manaia
C. M.
,
Berendonk
T.
,
Cacace
D.
,
Merlin
C.
,
Kreuzinger
N.
,
Schwartz
T.
,
Fatta-Kassinos
D.
,
Rizzo
L.
,
Schwermer
C. U.
,
Garelick
H.
,
Jurkevitch
E.
&
Cytryn
E.
2016
High throughput analysis of integron gene cassettes in wastewater environments
.
Environmental Science & Technology
50
(
21
),
11825
11836
.
http://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.6b03188
.
Hubeny
J.
,
Harnisz
M.
,
Korzeniewska
E.
,
Buta
M.
,
Zieliński
W.
,
Rolbiecki
D.
,
Giebułtowicz
J.
,
Nałęcz-Jawecki
G.
&
Płaza
G.
2021
Industrialization as a source of heavy metals and antibiotics which can enhance the antibiotic resistance in wastewater, sewage sludge and river water
.
PLoS One
16
(
6
),
e0252691
.
http://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0252691
.
Jain
S. K.
,
Agarwal
P. K.
&
Singh
V. P.
,
2007
Hydrology and water resources of India
. In:
Water Science and Technology Library
(
Singh
V. P.
, ed.).
Springer
,
Dordrecht
, p.
1258
.
Jia
J.
,
Guan
Y.
,
Cheng
M.
,
Chen
H.
,
He
J.
,
Wang
S.
&
Wang
Z.
2018
Occurrence and distribution of antibiotics and antibiotic resistance genes in Ba River, China
.
Science of the Total Environment
642
,
1136
1144
.
http://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.06.149
.
Kim
Y.
,
Lee
K. B.
&
Choi
K.
2016
Effect of runoff discharge on the environmental levels of 13 veterinary antibiotics: a case study of Han River and Kyungahn Stream, South Korea
.
Marine Pollution Bullettin
107
,
347
354
.
http://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2016.03.011
.
Klein
E. Y.
,
Van-Boeckel
T. P.
,
Martinez
E. M.
,
Pant
S.
,
Gandra
S.
,
Levin
S. A.
,
Goossens
H.
&
Laxminarayan
R.
2018
Global increase and geographic convergence in antibiotic consumption between 2000 and 2015
.
Proceedings of National Academy of Sciences, United States of America
115
,
E3463
E3470
.
https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1717295115
.
Köck
R.
,
Daniels-Haardt
I.
,
Becker
K.
,
Mellmann
A.
,
Friedrich
A. W.
,
Mevius
D.
,
Schwarz
S.
&
Jurke
A.
2018
Carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae in wildlife, food-producing, and companion animals: a systematic review
.
Clinical Microbiology & Infection
24
,
1241
1250
.
http://doi.org/10.1016/j.cmi.2018.04.004
.
Mahaney
A. P.
&
Franklin
R. B.
2022
Persistence of wastewater-associated antibiotic resistant bacteria in river microcosms
.
Science of the Total Environment
14
(
819
),
153099
.
http://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.153099
.
Marathe
N. P.
,
Pal
C.
,
Gaikwad
S. S.
,
Jonsson
V.
,
Kristiansson
E.
&
Larsson
D. G. J.
2017
Untreated urban waste contaminates Indian river sediments with resistance genes to last resort antibiotics
.
Water Research
124
,
388
397
.
http://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2017.07.060
.
Naas
T.
,
Cuzon
G.
,
Villegas
M.-V.
,
Lartigue
M.-F.
,
Quinn
J. P.
&
Nordmann
P.
2008
Genetic structures at the origin of acquisition of the beta-lactamase bla KPC gene
.
Antimicrobial Agents of Chemotherapy
52
,
1257
1263
.
http://doi.org/10.1128/AAC.01451-07
.
Ng
L. K.
,
Martin
I.
,
Alfa
M.
&
Mulvey
M.
2001
Multiplex PCR for the detection of tetracycline resistant genes
.
Molecular and Cellular Probes
15
(
4
),
209
215
.
http://doi.org/10.1006/mcpr.2001.0363
.
Obayiuwana
A.
,
Ogunjobi
A.
&
Ibekwe
A.
2021
Prevalence of antibiotic resistance genes in pharmaceutical wastewaters
.
Water
13
(
13
),
1731
.
https://doi.org/10.3390/w13131731
.
Ramírez-Castillo
F. Y.
,
Avelar-González
F. J.
,
Garneau
P.
,
Márquez Díaz
F.
,
Guerrero Barrera
A. L.
&
Harel
J.
2013
Presence of multi-drug resistant pathogenic Escherichia coli in the San Pedro River located in the State of Aguascalientes, Mexico
.
Frontiers in Microbiology
4
,
147
.
http://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2013.00147
.
Ravi
N. K.
,
Srivastava
A.
,
Ram
K.
&
Jha
P. K.
2021
Nutrient chemistry and eutrophication risk assessment of the Ghaghara River
.
India. Water Supply
21
(
7
),
3486
3502
.
https://doi.org/10.2166/ws.2021.110
.
Sabri
N. A.
,
Schmitt
H.
,
Van der Zaan
B.
,
Gerritsen
H. W.
,
Zuidema
T.
,
Rijnaarts
H. H. M.
&
Langenhoff
A. A. M.
2020
Prevalence of antibiotics and antibiotic resistance genes in a wastewater effluent-receiving river in the Netherlands
.
Journal of Environmental and Chemical Engineering
8
(
1
),
102245
.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jece.2018.03.004
.
Samreen
A. I.
,
Malak
H. A.
&
Abulreesh
H. H.
2021
Environmental antimicrobial resistance and its drivers: a potential threat to public health
.
Journal of Global Antimicrobial Resistance
27
,
101
111
.
http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jgar.2021.08.001
.
Singh
S. K.
,
Sarin
M. M.
&
France-Lanord
C.
2005
Chemical erosion in the eastern Himalaya: major ion composition of the Brahmaputra and 13C of dissolved inorganic carbon
.
Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta
69
(
14
),
3573
3588
.
http://doi.org/10.1016/j.gca.2005.02.033
.
Su
S.
,
Li
C.
,
Yang
J.
,
Xu
Q.
,
Qiu
Z.
,
Xue
B.
,
Wang
S.
,
Zhao
C.
,
Xiao
Z.
,
Wang
J.
&
Shen
Z.
2020
Distribution of antibiotic resistance genes in three different natural water bodies-A Lake, River and Sea
.
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
17
(
2
),
552
.
http://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17020552
.
Tripathi
V.
&
Tripathi
P.
,
2017
Antibiotic resistance genes: an emerging environmental pollutant
. In:
Perspectives in Environmental Toxicology. Environmental Science and Engineering
(
Kesari
K.
, ed.).
Springer
,
Cham
.
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-46248-6_9
.
Vakulenko
S. B.
&
Mobashery
S.
2003
Versatility of aminoglycosides and prospects for their future
.
Clinical and Microbiological Reviews
16
,
430
450
.
http://doi.org/10.1128/CMR.16.3.430-450.2003
.
World Health Organization
.
2018
Global Action Plan on Antimicrobial Resistance
.
World Health Organization
,
Geneva
.
Available from: http://www.who.int/drugresistance/global_action_plan/en/ (accessed December 2018)
.
Xu
J.
,
Xu
Y.
,
Wang
H.
,
Guo
C.
,
Qiu
H.
,
He
Y.
,
Zhang
Y.
,
Li
X.
&
Meng
W.
2015
Occurrence of antibiotics and antibiotic resistance genes in a sewage treatment plant and its effluent-receiving river
.
Chemosphere
119
,
1379
1385
.
http://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2014.02.040
.
Yong
D.
,
Toleman
M. A.
,
Giske
C. G.
,
Cho
H. S.
,
Sundman
K.
,
Lee
K.
&
Walsh
T. R.
2009
Characterization of a new metallo-β-lactamase gene, bla NDM-1, and a novel erythromycin esterase gene carried on a unique genetic structure in Klebsiella pneumoniae sequence type 14 from India
.
Antimicrobial Agents of Chemotherapy
53
,
5046
5054
.
http://doi.org/10.1128/AAC.00774-09
.
Zalewska
M.
,
Błażejewska
A.
,
Czapko
A.
&
Popowska
M.
2021
Antibiotics and antibiotic resistance genes in animal manure-consequences of Its application in agriculture
.
Frontiers in Microbiology
12
,
610656
.
http://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2021.610656
.

Author notes

Authors have equally contributed

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Licence (CC BY 4.0), which permits copying, adaptation and redistribution, provided the original work is properly cited (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).