Rainwater harvesting is a viable option for dealing with the global challenge of increasing water scarcity, but heavy metal contamination often prevents it from being widely used for drinking water purposes. Harvested rainwater collected from galvanized iron (GI) and tile roofs containing iron concentration of 0.46 and 0.38 mg/L respectively, were treated by two nano sorbents, CaCO3-nZVI and PUF/CaCO3-nZVI with the intention of making the iron concentration conform to drinking quality standards. The nano sorbents were synthesized and characterized using BET (Brunauer-–Emmett–Teller surface area), SEM-EDX (Scanning Electron Microscopy-Energy-Dispersive X-ray spectroscopy, and FTIR (Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy). CaCO3-nZVI achieved iron removal efficacy of 88.69% and 89.21% for harvested rainwater from GI sheet roof and tiled roof respectively and the efficiency increased to 95.65% and 95.78% when treated with PUF/CaCO3-nZVI. In addition, the nano sorbents were found to have appreciable removal efficiency for other metals (Pb, Mn, Zn, Cu, Cd and Cr) present in the collected rainwater. The use of FTIR and EDX to characterise spent nano sorbents divulged that the iron was removed through sorption process. This study thus explored the potential of CaCO3-nZVI and PUF/CaCO3-nZVI for treating heavy metal contamination in roof-harvested rainwater.

  • Developed a novel nanocomposite by impregnation and surface modification of nZVI.

  • PUF/CaCO3-nZVI reduced the iron concentration to acceptable limit for the potable water.

  • PUF/CaCO3-nZVI was able to simultaneously remove other heavy metals.

  • Novel nano composite reduced the turbidity of the samples to permissible limit.

  • PUF/CaCO3-nZVI outperformed conventional sorbents in iron removal.

Graphical Abstract

Graphical Abstract
Graphical Abstract

Most urban areas around the world have experienced rapid population growth, posing the challenge of supplying enough water to meet the demands of social consumption and economic activities (Kilonzo et al. 2019). Rainwater harvesting is a promising option for addressing water supply pressures in areas where water sources are scarce or polluted (Thomas 2009). Rainwater reuse reduces the consumption of potable water, thereby conserving fresh water resources. One of the most significant barriers to rainwater usage is public health (Igbinosa & Aighewi 2017). Heavy metals and microbiological contamination are two of the most commonly mentioned issues regarding the quality of water flowing down from roofs (Meera & Mansoor Ahammed 2006; Ahammed & Meera 2010). Iron contamination is often reported in roof-harvested rainwater (Igbinosa & Aighewi 2017). Although iron is a necessary element for humans, its presence in aqueous systems above a specific level renders the water unfit for drinking and other purposes due to colouring, metallic taste, odour, turbidity, and laundry stains (Khatri et al. 2017). Providing people with clean drinking water is a universal human need that necessitates efficient yet cost-effective methods. Various systems for providing clean drinking water are available, but they are either costly or ineffective without energy. Therefore, appropriate technology that makes use of low-cost, generally accessible materials which meet or surpass the capabilities of current water treatment methods is the need of the present-day water scenario.

Nano materials exhibit several unique properties compared to bulk materials due to their large surface area and high pore volume, and have received considerable interest in the scientific community over the past few decades (Rajan 2011; Rathor et al. 2017). The large surface area makes these materials effective adsorbents in environmental remediation. Among the nano materials, nano zero-valent iron (nZVI) has been extensively studied for heavy metal treatment, but nZVI is susceptible to agglomeration and rapid oxidation, causing recovery problems (Phenrat et al. 2007; Baalousha et al. 2008). Due to these difficulties, applications of nZVI can limit environmental clean-up to a large extent. However, many studies have been made and/or are in progress for the surface modification and immobilization of nZVI to overcome these challenges (Fatisson et al. 2010; Bhowmick et al. 2014; Fu et al. 2015; Liu et al. 2016; Gao et al. 2018). Among the modifiers, CaCO3 is an important bio-compatible material having ideal biodegradability. At the same time, phases and the morphology of CaCO3 can be readily modified and controlled to acquire a special structure (Galván-Ruiz et al. 2009; Wang et al. 2016; Zhang et al. 2019). Similarly, polyurethane (PU) is an organic polymer having C = O and N-H groups, which facilitate its binding with nZVI (Khan et al. 2019; Sasidharan et al. 2021). In this study, CaCO3 was employed to encapsulate the nZVI, and the encapsulated nZVI was effectively immobilized on PU foam (PUF) for the first time. CaCO3-nZVI and PUF/CaCO3-nZVI were used to remove iron from harvested rainwater.

Chemicals and instruments

Merck Millipore supplied analytical grade ferrous sulphate heptahydrate (FeSO4·7H2O), CaCO3, ethylene diamine tetraacetic acid (EDTA), sodium borohydride (NaBH4), ethanol (CH3CH2OH), sodium hydroxide (NaOH), and hydrochloric acid (HCl).

For dispersing CaCO3 in ethanol, a 20 kHz ultrasonic homogeniser sonicator with a 12 mm ultrasonic probe was utilized. Remi R-12M laboratory centrifuge and a Palintest PTBH-7500 photometer were employed for the separation of nanoparticles and analysis of iron, respectively.

Preparation of calcium carbonate encapsulated nano zero-valent iron (CaCO3-nZVI)

4.17 g FeSO4·7H2O was dissolved in 150 mL distilled water and carefully mixed with 100 mL 0.05 M EDTA solution. CaCO3 suspension was prepared by dispersing 0.51 g CaCO3 in 150 mL ethanol using an ultrasonicator for 15 minutes. In a two-neck round bottom flask, CaCO3 suspension was added and combined with a mixture of FeSO4·7H2O (CaCO3/Fe mass ratio of 0.6) and EDTA solution. This mixture is named as CaCO3 dispersed iron salt solution. Nitrogen purging was used to remove the dissolved oxygen. After that, 2.84 g NaBH4 was dissolved in 100 mL distilled water and added into the flask drop by drop. The mixture was agitated for another 20 minutes after the addition of the reducing agent. Centrifugation was used to collect the black nanoparticles, which were then washed three times with ethanol. The particles were oven-dried at 50 °C and kept in a sealed container for future usage under normal circumstances (Zhang et al. 2019; Cheng et al. 2020; Antony et al. 2022).

Immobilization of calcium carbonate encapsulated nano zero-valent iron on polyurethane foam (PUF/CaCO3-nZVI)

The novel nano-composite, PUF/CaCO3-nZVI was prepared for the first time in this study. The PUF was cut into 25 mm × 25 mm × 6 mm pieces and submerged in a nitrogen purged, CaCO3 dispersed iron salt solution (prepared as mentioned in section 2.2) for 1 hour. After 1 hour, the PUF pieces were lightly washed with ethanol and immersed for 30 minutes in 100 mL of 0.75 M NaBH4 for full reduction. PUF/CaCO3-nZVI sorbents were washed three times in absolute ethanol before being oven-dried at 50 °C.

Characterization studies of CaCO3-nZVI and PUF/CaCO3-nZVI

The surface morphology and elemental composition of nano materials were studied by scanning electron microscope (CARL-ZEISS model DSM 960 A, Germany) equipped with energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy. Bruker D8 advance X-ray diffractometer with Cu-Kα radiation source operating at 40 kV/ 40 mA was used to investigate the crystalline properties of nano materials.

The surface area, pore size and pore volume distribution were measured by N2 adsorption-desorption isotherms using Brunauer-–Emmett–Teller surface area analyser (BET, Belsorp Max, MicrotracBelsorp, Japan).

The Thermo Nicolet Avtar 370 model spectrometer was employed to record the FTIR spectrum at a resolution of 4 cm−1. The spectrum was recorded in the transmission mode at room temperature using KBr pellets in the range 400–4,000 cm−1. The sample was mixed with spectrally pure KBr and pressed to form thin plate, then subjected to IR spectroscopic analysis to detect the interacting functional groups for the formation of sorbents.

Rainwater sample collection

The harvested rainwater was collected in polyurethane storage tanks using PVC downpipe attached to two roof systems viz. TR and GISR. Roof runoff was collected for one week in the middle of rain event during September-October months of 2021. The roofs were of 12 years old and located in a residential area adjacent to Cochin International airport, Kerala, India and NH 65. Water samples were then collected carefully in cleaned high-density polythene bottles (1 L capacity). Bottles were sealed and brought to the laboratory for analyses which were carried out in accordance with the standard methods (APHA 2012, 2017). ICP-OES (ICAP 7000 series) was used to determine the concentration of heavy metals present in water samples.

Performance of CaCO3-nZVI and PUF/CaCO3-nZVI in iron removal from harvested rainwater

The potential of CaCO3-nZVI and PUF/CaCO3-nZVI for iron remediation were explored by conducting experiments in batch equilibration mode. 200 mL of samples were taken in a series of conical flasks and agitated in an orbital shaker by adding 0.25 g/L nano sorbent at natural sample pH as well as at pH 10, which was found to be maximum in synthetic iron solution (Figure S2).

10 mL sample was withdrawn after 3 hours treatment (optimum reaction period found for synthetic iron solution- Figure S1) and allowed settling for 20 min. The centrifugation, as well as magnetic separation, was given for the collected supernatant and the total iron concentration in the treated sample was analyzed using Palintest PTBH-7500 photometer, which employs the principle of 1–10, phenanthroline method (APHA 2012).

Characterisation of CaCO3-nZVI and PUF/CaCO3-nZVI

The BET specific surface areas of nZVI, CaCO3-nZVI and PUF/CaCO3-nZVI were 20.89, 26.71 and 31.42 m2/g, respectively. By immobilizing CaCO3-nZVI on the PUF, the surface area was increased 1.2 times, leading to an increase in PUF/CaCO3-nZVI sorption capacity. Figure 1 shows the surface morphology of CaCO3-nZVI and PUF/CaCO3-nZVI. In the absence of PUF, CaCO3-nZVI exhibited a chain-like morphology with intermittent agglomerations as a result of the combined effect of their inherent magnetic property and its tendency to remain in a thermodynamically favourable state (Figure 1(a)). When PUF was used as the supporting material, the agglomeration decreased as expected as the dispersion of CaCO3-nZVI increased (Figure 1(b)).
Figure 1

SEM images of (a) CaCO3-nZVI and (b) PUF/CaCO3-nZVI.

Figure 1

SEM images of (a) CaCO3-nZVI and (b) PUF/CaCO3-nZVI.

Close modal
The chemical composition of freshly prepared CaCO3-nZVI as well as PUF/CaCO3-nZVI from the EDX analysis (Figure 2(b) and 2(c)) revealed the presence of Ca in addition to Fe, O and Na present in the EDX spectrum of bare nZVI (Figure 2(a)). The presence of Ca and iron in the EDX result clearly demonstrate the successful encapsulation as well as immobilization of nZVI.
Figure 2

EDX spectrum of (a) nZVI (b) CaCO3-nZVI and (c) PUF/CaCO3-nZVI.

Figure 2

EDX spectrum of (a) nZVI (b) CaCO3-nZVI and (c) PUF/CaCO3-nZVI.

Close modal
The FTIR spectrum of encapsulated nZVI is presented in Figure 3(a). The broad absorption band at 3,410–3,128 cm−1 is associated with O-H stretching vibration of carboxylic groups. The band at 1,630 and 1,383 cm−1 can be attributed to C = O stretching vibration and C-H bending vibrations, respectively. The absorbance peak at 1,107 cm−1 corresponds to C-O stretching vibrations (Yang et al. 2018). These peaks are corresponding to EDTA. The comparison of the FTIR spectra of nZVI (Figure 4) and encapsulated nZVI reveals new peaks at 708, 873 and 1,419 cm−1 for modified nZVI that correspond to in-plane bending, out-of-plane bending and asymmetrical stretching vibration peaks of O-C-O respectively (Wang et al. 2016). Moreover, the interaction between the O-H group of EDTA and calcium ions of CaCO3 is indicated by the emergence of Ca-O bond at 534 cm−1 (Galván-Ruiz et al. 2009; Linggawati 2016). The above results confirm that the CaCO3 was successfully encapsulated the nZVI surface and the encapsulation can be hypothesized by the model in Figure 5.
Figure 3

FTIR spectrum of CaCO3-nZVI.

Figure 3

FTIR spectrum of CaCO3-nZVI.

Close modal
Figure 4

FTIR spectrum of nZVI.

Figure 4

FTIR spectrum of nZVI.

Close modal
Figure 5

Proposed model for surface encapsulation of nZVI.

Figure 5

Proposed model for surface encapsulation of nZVI.

Close modal
The peaks at 3,296–3,293 and at 1,582 cm−1 in PUF/CaCO3-nZVI (Figure 6(a)) correspond to N-H stretching and bending vibrations, respectively. It can be seen that the N-H stretching and bending vibrations of PUF (3,356–3,352 and 1,535 cm−1) (Figure S3) are shifted after impregnation. But no changes in peaks corresponding to CaCO3 were observed. It indicates that the CaCO3 does not interact in impregnation process, instead the impregnation happens due to the interaction between the N-H group of PU and nano zero-valent iron as depicted in Figure 7.
Figure 6

FTIR spectrum of spent PUF/CaCO3-nZVI.

Figure 6

FTIR spectrum of spent PUF/CaCO3-nZVI.

Close modal
Figure 7

Proposed model for immobilization of CaCO3-nZVI on polyurethane foam.

Figure 7

Proposed model for immobilization of CaCO3-nZVI on polyurethane foam.

Close modal

Characteristics of harvested rainwater

The physico-chemical characteristics of the samples collected from different aqueous systems are listed in Table 1. The iron content in all water samples exceeds the drinking water standard. The presence of other metals (Ca, Mg, Pb, Cu, Cd, Cr, Zn and Mn) was also detected in which the concentration of lead exceeds the acceptable limit for the potable water as per Indian Drinking Water Standard (IS 10500, 2012).

Table 1

Physico-chemical characteristics of roof-harvested rainwater

ParametersHarvested rainwater from GISRHarvested rainwater from TRDrinking water quality standards (IS 10500:12)
pH 7.36 7.11 6.5–8.5 
Turbidity (NTU) 2.6 4.8 1–5 
Conductivity (μS/cm) 76.1 85.6 – 
TDS (mg/L) 40.9 44.8 500–2,000 
Total hardness (mg/L as CaCO338.62 26.56 200–600 
Total alkalinity (mg/L as CaCO312.3 11.2 200–600 
Calcium (mg/L) 9.93 8.69 75–200 
Magnesium (mg/L) 14.6 11.44 30–100 
Iron (mg/L) 0.46 0.38 0.3 
Lead (mg/L) 0.09 0.05 0.01 
Chromium (mg/L) 0.007 0.004 0.05 
Cadmium (mg/L) 0.003 BDL 0.003 
Copper (mg/L) BDL 0.001 0.05–1.5 
Zinc (mg/L) 0.07 0.02 5–15 
Manganese (mg/L) 0.002 0.005 0.1–0.3 
ParametersHarvested rainwater from GISRHarvested rainwater from TRDrinking water quality standards (IS 10500:12)
pH 7.36 7.11 6.5–8.5 
Turbidity (NTU) 2.6 4.8 1–5 
Conductivity (μS/cm) 76.1 85.6 – 
TDS (mg/L) 40.9 44.8 500–2,000 
Total hardness (mg/L as CaCO338.62 26.56 200–600 
Total alkalinity (mg/L as CaCO312.3 11.2 200–600 
Calcium (mg/L) 9.93 8.69 75–200 
Magnesium (mg/L) 14.6 11.44 30–100 
Iron (mg/L) 0.46 0.38 0.3 
Lead (mg/L) 0.09 0.05 0.01 
Chromium (mg/L) 0.007 0.004 0.05 
Cadmium (mg/L) 0.003 BDL 0.003 
Copper (mg/L) BDL 0.001 0.05–1.5 
Zinc (mg/L) 0.07 0.02 5–15 
Manganese (mg/L) 0.002 0.005 0.1–0.3 

Performance of CaCO3-nZVI and PUF/CaCO3-nZVI in iron removal from roof-harvested rainwater

The potency of the nano sorbents (CaCO3-nZVI and PUF/CaCO3-nZVI) in iron removal was determined by conducting batch experimental study in roof-harvested rainwater. The results of 3 hour treatment (optimum contact time) using 0.25 g/L CaCO3-nZVI and PUF/ CaCO3-nZVI at natural sample pH and optimum pH for harvested rainwater from GI sheet roof and tiled roof are shown in Figure 8(a) and 8(b) respectively. The reaction period was fixed to 3 hours as the nano sorbents showed maximum removal efficiency at 3 hours in synthetic iron solution of 0.5 mg/L influent iron concentration and entered to a saturation phase after 3 hours in studies conducted with synthetic iron solution (Figure S1). CaCO3-nZVI achieved 82.8% and 83.4% iron removal for roof-harvested rainwater from GISR and TR respectively at their respective sample pH while the corresponding removal efficiencies were 88.69% and 89.21% of iron at pH 10. The iron removal capacity was enhanced to 95.65% (GI sheet roof) and 95.78% (tiled roof) when treated with PUF/CaCO3-nZVI at pH 10. The treatment process was carried out at pH 10 as the sorbents achieved maximum iron removal at pH 10 from synthetic iron solution (Figure S2). The pH of the samples that were treated at sample pH (7.36 and 7.11) was found to be near to the neutral (7.2 for GI sheet roof and 6.92 for TR) and obeys Indian drinking water standards. The other water quality parameters also conformed to the Indian Drinking Water Standard (IS 10500, 2012).
Figure 8

Iron removal performance of nano sorbents for harvested rainwater from (a) GI sheet roof (b) Tiled roof.

Figure 8

Iron removal performance of nano sorbents for harvested rainwater from (a) GI sheet roof (b) Tiled roof.

Close modal

The effluent characteristics presented in Table 2 shows that both CaCO3-nZVI and PUF/CaCO3-nZVI have the capacity to bring the iron concentration to the desired limits of drinking water. The reduced concentration of other metals present in the harvested rainwater viz. Ca, Mg, Pb, Cd, Cr, Cu, Zn and Mn are also shown. The presence of other metal cations detected in EDX results of spent nano sorbents further verifies the high potential of CaCO3-nZVI and PUF/CaCO3-nZVI in removing heavy metals (Table 3).

Table 2

Physico-chemical characteristics of samples after treatment with sorbents at pH 10

ParametersHarvested rainwater from GISR treated with
Harvested rainwater from TR treated with
Indian Drinking water Standards (IS 10500:12)
CaCO3-nZVIPUF/CaCO3-nZVICaCO3-nZVIPUF/CaCO3-nZVI
pH 9.8 9.5 9.2 9.6 6.5–8.5 
Turbidity (NTU) 2.2 2.4 3.2 2.5 1–5 
Conductivity (μS/cm) 64.2 60.8 74.6 61.4 – 
TDS (mg/L) 38.5 42.6 46.5 40.2 500–2,000 
Total hardness (mg/L as CaCO342.5 46.8 20.12 22.56 200–600 
Total alkalinity (mg/L as CaCO318.2 15.6 9.6 8.2 200–600 
Calcium (mg/L) 5.26 3.25 6.45 5.12 75–200 
Magnesium (mg/L) 12.45 9.86 8.53 5.47 30–100 
Iron (mg/L) 0.052 0.02 0.041 0.016 0.3 
Lead (mg/L) 0.05 0.02 0.03 0.008 0.01 
Chromium (mg/L) 0.006 0.004 0.002 BDL 0.05 
Cadmium (mg/L) 0.002 0.001 BDL BDL 0.003 
Copper (mg/L) BDL BDL BDL BDL 0.05–1.5 
Zinc (mg/L) 0.04 0.01 0.008 0.003 5–15 
Manganese (mg/L) 0.001 BDL 0.003 BDL 0.1–0.3 
ParametersHarvested rainwater from GISR treated with
Harvested rainwater from TR treated with
Indian Drinking water Standards (IS 10500:12)
CaCO3-nZVIPUF/CaCO3-nZVICaCO3-nZVIPUF/CaCO3-nZVI
pH 9.8 9.5 9.2 9.6 6.5–8.5 
Turbidity (NTU) 2.2 2.4 3.2 2.5 1–5 
Conductivity (μS/cm) 64.2 60.8 74.6 61.4 – 
TDS (mg/L) 38.5 42.6 46.5 40.2 500–2,000 
Total hardness (mg/L as CaCO342.5 46.8 20.12 22.56 200–600 
Total alkalinity (mg/L as CaCO318.2 15.6 9.6 8.2 200–600 
Calcium (mg/L) 5.26 3.25 6.45 5.12 75–200 
Magnesium (mg/L) 12.45 9.86 8.53 5.47 30–100 
Iron (mg/L) 0.052 0.02 0.041 0.016 0.3 
Lead (mg/L) 0.05 0.02 0.03 0.008 0.01 
Chromium (mg/L) 0.006 0.004 0.002 BDL 0.05 
Cadmium (mg/L) 0.002 0.001 BDL BDL 0.003 
Copper (mg/L) BDL BDL BDL BDL 0.05–1.5 
Zinc (mg/L) 0.04 0.01 0.008 0.003 5–15 
Manganese (mg/L) 0.001 BDL 0.003 BDL 0.1–0.3 

BDL, Below Detection Limit.

Table 3

EDX analysis of CaCO3- nZVI and PUF/CaCO3-nZVI after treatment at pH 10

ElementCaCO3-nZVI
PUF/CaCO3-nZVI
Before treatmentAfter treatment of harvested rainwater from GISRAfter treatment of harvested rainwater from TRBefore treatmentAfter treatment of harvested rainwater from GISRAfter treatment of harvested rainwater from TR
Wt%Wt%Wt%Wt%Wt%Wt%
11.18 3.5 6.5 59.8 46.14 62.12 
53.83 31.6 26.5 24.25 25 17.24 
– – – 5.42 5.05 0.75 
– – – 6.51 2.67 3.64 
Na 1.12 1.2 1.4 0.32 2.89 1.15 
Ca 12.14 12.2 10.9 1.42 3.51 5.62 
Mg – 5.6 3.2 – 10.2 2.96 
Fe 21.11 45.58 51.36 2.28 3.61 6.52 
Pb – 0.22 0.14 – 0.63 – 
Cr – 0.1 – – 0.3 – 
Total 100 100 100  100 100 
ElementCaCO3-nZVI
PUF/CaCO3-nZVI
Before treatmentAfter treatment of harvested rainwater from GISRAfter treatment of harvested rainwater from TRBefore treatmentAfter treatment of harvested rainwater from GISRAfter treatment of harvested rainwater from TR
Wt%Wt%Wt%Wt%Wt%Wt%
11.18 3.5 6.5 59.8 46.14 62.12 
53.83 31.6 26.5 24.25 25 17.24 
– – – 5.42 5.05 0.75 
– – – 6.51 2.67 3.64 
Na 1.12 1.2 1.4 0.32 2.89 1.15 
Ca 12.14 12.2 10.9 1.42 3.51 5.62 
Mg – 5.6 3.2 – 10.2 2.96 
Fe 21.11 45.58 51.36 2.28 3.61 6.52 
Pb – 0.22 0.14 – 0.63 – 
Cr – 0.1 – – 0.3 – 
Total 100 100 100  100 100 

Remediation mechanism of CaCO3-nZVI and PUF/CaCO3-nZVI

The nano zero-valent iron nanoparticle has a typical core shell structure produced during the synthesis process, which includes a shell of Fe(II), Fe(III), and core of zero-valent iron (Çelebi et al. 2007; Boparai et al. 2011). Because of its unique structure, nZVI has the abilities of reduction, surface sorption, stabilization, and precipitation of different pollutants. For metal ions with standard electrode potentials (E0) very close to, or more negative than, Fe0 (−0.44 V), the removal process by nZVI is mostly by sorption/surface complexation. In comparison, removal of metal ions which have E0 much more positive than Fe, occurs primarily via surface mediated reductive precipitation. However, sorption with partial chemical reduction has been demonstrated for metal cations that are only slightly more electropositive than iron (Li & Zhang 2007; Li et al. 2017). According to this concept, the sorption through electrostatic interaction/surface complexation is the only possible mechanism that can occur in iron sequestration by CaCO3-nZVI and PUF/ CaCO3-nZVI due to the same redox behaviour of the nanoparticles and the metal ions present in the aqueous medium.

This iron adsorption on CaCO3-nZVI is proposed to occur in the following ways in light of FTIR spectrum of nanoparticle (Figure 3) after treatment:

  • (1)

    The broad absorption band at 3,410–3,128 cm−1 corresponding to O-H stretching vibration is shifted to 3,352–3,350 cm−1 and 3,371–3,369 cm−1 after treatment of harvested rainwater from GI and tiled roof respectively, showing the possibility of contaminant iron adsorption on iron oxide/hydroxide shell. Moreover, emergence of a peak at 582 cm−1 and 583 cm−1 corresponding to Fe-O stretching vibration confirms the role of oxide shell.

  • (2)

    The absorption band at 1,630 cm−1 before treatment is shifted to 1,633 cm−1 and 1,632 cm−1 after treatment. This peak is attributed to the C = O stretching vibration present in the EDTA as well as in CaCO3 and confirms the contaminant iron adsorption on these groups. Similar observations were found in studies by Cheng et al. (2020) for chromium removal by CaCO3 coated nZVI.

  • (3)

    The peak at 1,383 cm−1 (C-H stretching vibration) has disappeared and the peak at 1,107 cm−1 (C-O or C-O-C) has shifted to 1,109 cm−1 and 1,102 cm−1 after treatment. The above changes in the peaks of functional groups present in EDTA also reveal iron adsorption.

The characterization studies thus divulge the involvement of iron oxide/hydroxide shell, EDTA and CaCO3 in the iron sorption process of CaCO3-nZVI (Table 4). Similarly, the FTIR spectrum of spent PUF/ CaCO3-nZVI (Figure 6) and the possible functional groups presented in Table 4 recommends that the iron sequestration process may occur as follows:

  • (1)

    The shifting occurs in the region 3,296–3,293 cm−1 (N-H stretching vibration), 2,970 cm−1 and 2,929 cm−1 (C-H stretching vibration) and 1,582 cm−1 (N-H bending) unveil that the iron is adsorbed to the PUF/CaCO3-nZVI by making interactions with the N-H and C-H group of PUF.

  • (2)

    The peak at 3,410 cm−1 (O-H stretching vibration) has disappeared and new peak at 582 cm−1 and 574 cm−1 (Fe-O stretching vibration) are observed in the spent PUF/CaCO3-nZVI. These changes occurred after the treatment process proves the involvement of iron oxide shell in iron remediation.

  • (3)

    The absorption band at 1,630 cm−1 shifts to 1,639 cm−1 and 1,640 cm−1, after treatment of roof harvested rainwater from GI sheet and tiled roof respectively. The C = O stretching vibration found in EDTA and CaCO3 is responsible for this peak, which verifies contaminant iron sorption on these groups.

  • (4)

    Similar to the observations for CaCO3-nZVI, the peaks corresponding to C-H (1,383 cm−1) and C-O or C-O-C stretching vibration (1,107 cm−1) are shifted after treatment, revealing the significant role of EDTA.

Comparison study of removal efficiency of iron by various sorbets/techniques

In comparison to previously reported techniques, PUF/CaCO3-nZVI was found to have greater efficacy in iron remediation (Table 5). PUF/CaCO3-nZVI outperformed both traditional sorbents/techniques and nano materials in iron removal. In comparison to study conducted in wastewater using a nano composite of carbon nanotubes (CNT) and nano iron oxide, the iron removal efficacy is found to be low. However, as Fe3O4/CNT nano composite is toxic, its application is limited.

Table 4

Possible functional group assignments for peaks detected in FTIR spectrum of CaCO3- nZVI and PUF/ CaCO3-nZVI

Possible assignmentsCaCO3-CnZVI
PUF/ CaCO3-CnZVI
Before treatment (cm1)After treatment of harvested rainwater from GISR (cm1)After treatment of harvested rainwater from TR (cm1)Before treatment (cm1)After treatment of harvested rainwater from GISR (cm1)After treatment of harvested rainwater from TR (cm1)
O-H stretching 3,410 3,352–3,350 3,371–3,369 3,410 – – 
N-H stretching – – – 3,296–3,293 3,294–3,292 3,293–3,290 
C-H stretching – – – 2,970 2,972 2,971 
– – – 2,929 2,901 2,912 
C = O stretching 1,630 1,633 1,632 1,630 1,639 1,640 
N-H bending – – – 1,582 1,538 1,532 
In-plane bending of O-C-O 1,419 1,419 1,419 1,419 1,415 1,419 
C-H bending 1,383 – – 1,383 1,374 1,378 
C-O or C-O-C stretching 1,107 1,109 1,102 1,107 1,112 1,110 
Out-of-plane bending of O-C-O 873 873 873 807 807 807 
Asymmetrical stretching of O-C-O 708 708 708 708 708 708 
Fe-O stretching – 582 583 – 582 574 
Ca-O stretching 534 – – – – – 
Possible assignmentsCaCO3-CnZVI
PUF/ CaCO3-CnZVI
Before treatment (cm1)After treatment of harvested rainwater from GISR (cm1)After treatment of harvested rainwater from TR (cm1)Before treatment (cm1)After treatment of harvested rainwater from GISR (cm1)After treatment of harvested rainwater from TR (cm1)
O-H stretching 3,410 3,352–3,350 3,371–3,369 3,410 – – 
N-H stretching – – – 3,296–3,293 3,294–3,292 3,293–3,290 
C-H stretching – – – 2,970 2,972 2,971 
– – – 2,929 2,901 2,912 
C = O stretching 1,630 1,633 1,632 1,630 1,639 1,640 
N-H bending – – – 1,582 1,538 1,532 
In-plane bending of O-C-O 1,419 1,419 1,419 1,419 1,415 1,419 
C-H bending 1,383 – – 1,383 1,374 1,378 
C-O or C-O-C stretching 1,107 1,109 1,102 1,107 1,112 1,110 
Out-of-plane bending of O-C-O 873 873 873 807 807 807 
Asymmetrical stretching of O-C-O 708 708 708 708 708 708 
Fe-O stretching – 582 583 – 582 574 
Ca-O stretching 534 – – – – – 
Table 5

Comparison of iron removal efficacies of different sorbents/techniques

Treatment unitSources of waterInfluent concentration (mg/L)Effluent concentration (mg/L)Removal efficiency (%)Adsorption capacity (mg/g)Reference
Activated carbon Tubewell 5.00 0.840 83.20 0.83 Ismail et al. (2017)  
Groundnut shell activated carbon Dam 3.11 0.310 90.00 0.56 Aji et al. (2015)  
Zeolite Tubewell 5.00 0.610 87.81 0.44 Ismail et al. (2017)  
Ultrafiltration Dam 1.00 0.140 86.00 – Choo et al. (2005)  
Oxidation-precipitation-filtration process Groundwater 0.3–5 0.1–1.5 66–70 – Bordoloi et al. (2013)  
Aeration Groundwater 15.70 10.400 33.70 – Pleasant et al. (2014)  
Pilot plant scale 1st stage: gravel filter 2nd stage: clay sphere filter 3rd stage: sand or zeolite filter 4th stage: UV disinfection Rainwater 0.97 0.194 80.00 – Pineda et al. (2022)  
Titanium oxide nanowire Drinking 2.00 0.400 79.77 0.32 Youssef & Malhat (2014)  
MnO2 modified nano hydroxyapatite Groundwater 0.68 0.150 77.60 0.606 Al-ghouti & Da (2020)  
Nanocomposite of CNT and nano iron oxide Wastewater 10–20 0.110–0.220 98.97 200 Alimohammadi et al. (2017)  
CaCO3-nZVI Harvested rainwater from GI sheet roof 0.46 0.052 88.69 7.75 Present Study 
Harvested rainwater from tiled roof 0.38 0.041 89.21 7.75 
PUF/CaCO3-nZVI Harvested rainwater from GI sheet roof 0.46 0.020 95.65 9.02 
Harvested rainwater from tiled roof 0.38 0.016 96.32 9.02 
Treatment unitSources of waterInfluent concentration (mg/L)Effluent concentration (mg/L)Removal efficiency (%)Adsorption capacity (mg/g)Reference
Activated carbon Tubewell 5.00 0.840 83.20 0.83 Ismail et al. (2017)  
Groundnut shell activated carbon Dam 3.11 0.310 90.00 0.56 Aji et al. (2015)  
Zeolite Tubewell 5.00 0.610 87.81 0.44 Ismail et al. (2017)  
Ultrafiltration Dam 1.00 0.140 86.00 – Choo et al. (2005)  
Oxidation-precipitation-filtration process Groundwater 0.3–5 0.1–1.5 66–70 – Bordoloi et al. (2013)  
Aeration Groundwater 15.70 10.400 33.70 – Pleasant et al. (2014)  
Pilot plant scale 1st stage: gravel filter 2nd stage: clay sphere filter 3rd stage: sand or zeolite filter 4th stage: UV disinfection Rainwater 0.97 0.194 80.00 – Pineda et al. (2022)  
Titanium oxide nanowire Drinking 2.00 0.400 79.77 0.32 Youssef & Malhat (2014)  
MnO2 modified nano hydroxyapatite Groundwater 0.68 0.150 77.60 0.606 Al-ghouti & Da (2020)  
Nanocomposite of CNT and nano iron oxide Wastewater 10–20 0.110–0.220 98.97 200 Alimohammadi et al. (2017)  
CaCO3-nZVI Harvested rainwater from GI sheet roof 0.46 0.052 88.69 7.75 Present Study 
Harvested rainwater from tiled roof 0.38 0.041 89.21 7.75 
PUF/CaCO3-nZVI Harvested rainwater from GI sheet roof 0.46 0.020 95.65 9.02 
Harvested rainwater from tiled roof 0.38 0.016 96.32 9.02 

The nZVI was successfully encapsulated by CaCO3 and immobilized on PUF. The increased surface area and widely dispersed particles visible in the SEM image confirm that encapsulation and immobilisation completely eliminated aggregation issues. The functional groups which plays significant role in the stabilization of nZVI through encapsulation as well as impregnation were identified using the FTIR spectrum. Both CaCO3-nZVI and PUF/CaCO3-nZVI showed high efficiency to sequester contaminant iron from harvested rainwater. The sorption mechanism was confirmed by EDX and FTIR spectra of spent nano sorbents, which revealed the favourable functional groups for iron adsorption. This research provides a new way of immobilising CaCO3-nZVI and demonstrates that surface encapsulated immobilized nZVI can be effectively used for iron removal from harvested water meeting potable standard.

The All India Council for Technical Education (AICTE) funded this research under the NDF-RPS initiative for NDF research scholars.

This study has not been published and is not being considered for publication anywhere. We have no potential competing interests to disclose.

All relevant data are included in the paper or its Supplementary Information.

The authors declare there is no conflict.

Ahammed
M. M.
&
Meera
V.
2010
Metal oxide/hydroxide-coated dual-media filter for simultaneous removal of bacteria and heavy metals from natural waters
.
J. Hazard. Mater.
181
,
788
793
.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2010.05.082
.
Aji
M. M.
,
Gutti
B.
&
Highina
B. K.
2015
Application of activated carbon in removal of iron and manganese from Alau Dam water in Maiduguri
.
Colomb. J. Life Sci.
17
,
35
39
.
Al-Ghouti
M. A.
&
Da
D. A.
2020
J. Hazard. Mater.
,
122383
.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2020.122383
.
Alimohammadi
V.
,
Sedighi
M.
&
Jabbari
E.
2017
Experimental study on efficient removal of total iron from wastewater using magnetic-modified multi-walled carbon nanotubes
.
Ecol. Eng.
102
,
90
97
.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2017.01.044
.
Antony
J.
,
Meera
V.
,
Raphael
V. P.
&
Vinod
P.
2022
Facile encapsulation of nano zero-valent iron with calcium carbonate: synthesis, characterization and application for iron remediation
.
J. Environ. Heal. Sci. Eng.
20
,
915
930
.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s40201-022-00831-0.
APHA 2012 Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater. Stand. Method. 541. ISBN 9780875532356.
APHA, AWWA, WEF 2017 Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater, 23rd edn. Am. Public Heal. Assoc. (APHA)/American Water Work. Assoc. (AWWA)/Water Environ. Fed.(WEF), Washington, DC
Baalousha
M.
,
Manciulea
A.
,
Cumberland
S
,
Kendall
K.
&
Jamie
R.
2008
Aggregation and surface properties of iron oxide nanoparticles
.
Environ. Toxicol. Chem.
27
,
1875
1882
Bhowmick
S.
,
Chakraborty
S.
,
Mondal
P.
,
Renterghem
W. V.
,
Berghe
S. V.
,
Ross
G. R.
,
Chatterjee
D.
&
Iglesias
M.
2014
Montmorillonite-supported nanoscale zero-valent iron for removal of arsenic from aqueous solution: Kinetics and mechanism
.
Chem. Eng. J.
243
,
14
23
.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2013.12.049.
Boparai
H. K.
,
Joseph
M.
&
Carroll
D. M. O.
2011
Kinetics and thermodynamics of cadmium ion removal by adsorption onto nano zerovalent iron particles
.
J. Hazard. Mater.
186
,
458
465
.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2010.11.029
.
Bordoloi
S.
,
Nath
S. K.
,
Gogoi
S.
&
Dutta
R. K.
2013
Arsenic and iron removal from groundwater by oxidation-coagulation at optimized pH: laboratory and field studies
.
J. Hazard. Mater.
260
,
618
626
.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2013.06.017
.
Çelebi
O.
,
Üzüm
Ç.
,
Shahwan
T.
&
Erten
H. N.
2007
A radiotracer study of the adsorption behavior of aqueous Ba2 + ions on nanoparticles of zero-valent iron
.
J. Hazard. Mater.
148
,
761
767
.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2007.06.122
.
Cheng
Y.
,
Dong
H.
&
Hao
T.
2020
CaCO3 coated nanoscale zero-valent iron (nZVI) for the removal of chromium(VI) in aqueous solution
.
Sep. Purif. Technol.
,
117967
.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seppur.2020.117967
.
Choo
K. H.
,
Lee
H.
&
Choi
S. J.
2005
Iron and manganese removal and membrane fouling during UF in conjunction with prechlorination for drinking water treatment
.
J. Memb. Sci.
267
,
18
26
.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2005.05.021
.
Fu
R
.,
Yang
Y
.,
Xu
Z.
,
Zhang
X.
,
Guo
X.
&
Bi
D.
2015
The removal of chromium (VI) and lead (II) from groundwater using sepiolite-supported nanoscale zero-valent iron (S-NZVI)
.
Chemosphere
138
,
726
734
.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2015.07.051
.
Galvan-Ruiz
M.
,
Hernandez
J.
,
Banos
L.
,
Noriega-Montes
J.
&
Rodriguez-Garcia
M.
2009
Characterization of calcium carbonate, calcium oxide, and calcium hydroxide as starting point to the improvement of lime for their use in construction
.
J. Mater. Civ. Eng.
21
,
694
698
.
https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)0899-1561(2009)21:11(694).
Gao
J.
,
Yang
L.
,
Liu
Y.
,
Shao
F.
,
Liao
Q.
&
Shang
J
.
2018
Scavenging of Cr(VI) from aqueous solutions by sulfide-modified nanoscale zero-valent iron supported by biochar
.
J. Taiwan Inst. Chem. Eng.
91
,
449
456
.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtice.2018.06.033.
Igbinosa
I. H.
&
Aighewi
I. T.
2017
Assessment of the physicochemical and heavy metal qualities of rooftop harvested rainwater in a rural community
.
Global Challenges
1
,
1700011
.
https://doi.org/10.1002/gch2.201700011
.
Ismail
A.
,
Harmuni
H.
&
Mohd
R. R. M. A. Z.
2017
Removal of iron and manganese using granular activated carbon and zeolite in artificial barrier of riverbank filtration
.
1842
,
020056
.
https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4983796
.
Khan
M. S. J.
,
Kamal
T.
,
Ali
F.
, Abdullah M. & Khan S. B.
2019
Chitosan-coated polyurethane sponge supported metal nanoparticles for catalytic reduction of organic pollutants
.
Int. J. Biol. Macromol.
132
,
772
783
.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2019.03.205.
Khatri
N.
,
Tyagi
S.
&
Rawtani
D.
2017
Recent strategies for the removal of iron from water: a review
.
J. Water Process Eng.
19
,
291
304
.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwpe.2017.08.015
.
Kilonzo
W.
,
Home
P.
,
Sang
J.
&
Kakoi
B.
2019
The storage and water quality characteristics of Rungiri quarry reservoir in Kiambu, Kenya, as a potential source of urban water
.
Hydrology
6
,
1
23
.
https://doi.org/10.3390/HYDROLOGY6040093
.
Li
S.
,
Wang
W.
,
Liang
F.
&
Zhang
W. X.
2017
Heavy metal removal using nanoscale zero-valent iron (nZVI): theory and application
.
J. Hazard. Mater.
322
,
163
171
.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2016.01.032
.
Meera
V.
&
Mansoor Ahammed
M.
2006
Water quality of rooftop rainwater harvesting systems: a review
.
J. Water Supply Res. Technol. – AQUA
55
,
257
268
.
https://doi.org/10.2166/aqua.2006.008
.
Phenrat
T.
,
Saleh
N.
,
Sirk
K.
,
Robert
D.
&
Gregory
V. L.
2007
Aggregation and sedimentation of aqueous nanoscale zerovalent iron dispersions
.
Environ. Sci. Technol.
41
,
284
290
.
https://doi.org/10.1021/es061349a.
Pineda
E.
,
Guaya
D.
,
Rivera
G.
,
García-Ruiz
M. J.
&
Osorio
F.
2022
Rainwater treatment: an approach for drinking water provision to indigenous people in Ecuadorian Amazon
.
Int. J. Environ. Sci. Technol.
19
,
8769
8782
.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s13762-021-03741-0.
Pleasant
S.
,
Donnell
A.
,
Powell
J.
,
Jain
P.
&
Townsend
T.
2014
Evaluation of air sparging and vadose zone aeration for remediation of iron and manganese-impacted groundwater at a closed municipal landfill
.
Sci. Total Environ.
485–486
,
31
40
.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2014.03.028.
Rajan
C. S. R.
2011
Nanotechnology in groundwater remediation
.
Int. J. Environ. Sci. Dev.
2
,
182
187
.
https://doi.org/10.7763/ijesd.2011.v2.121
.
Rathor
G.
,
Chopra
N.
&
Adhikari
T.
2017
Synthesis and characterization of nano particles of zero-valent iron for environmental remediation
.
Int. J. Chem. Stud.
5
,
282
285
.
Thomas
R. O. Y. M.
,
Philosophy DOF
.
2009
Studies on the Quality of Rainwater at Various Land Use Locations and Variations by Interaction with Domestic Rainwater Harvesting Systems
.
Wang
B.
,
Yang
X.
,
Wang
L.
,
Li
G.
&
Li
Y.
,
2016
Facile preparation of CaCO3 with diversified patterns modulated by N-[(2-hydroxyl)-propyl-3-trimethylammonium] chitosan chloride
.
Powder Technol.
299
,
51
61
.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.powtec.2016.05.036.
Yang
F.
,
Zhang
S.
,
Sun
Y.
,
Cheng
K.
,
Li
J.
&
Tsang
D. C. W
.
2018
Fabrication and characterization of hydrophilic corn stalk biochar-supported nanoscale zero-valent iron composites for efficient metal removal
.
Bioresour. Technol.
265
,
490
497
.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2018.06.029.
Youssef
A. M.
&
Malhat
F. M.
2014
Selective removal of heavy metals from drinking water using titanium dioxide nanowire
.
Macromol. Symp.
337
,
96
101
.
https://doi.org/10.1002/masy.201450311
.
Zhang
X.
,
Shi
D.
,
Li
X.
,
Zhang
Y.
,
Wang
J.
&
Fan
J.
2019
Nanoscale dispersing of zero-valent iron on CaCO3 and their significant synergistic effect in high performance removal of lead
.
Chemosphere
224
,
390
397
.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2019.02.139.
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Licence (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), which permits copying and redistribution for non-commercial purposes with no derivatives, provided the original work is properly cited (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

Supplementary data