Recent research has shown that the equilibrium between aggregation and breakup in flocculation kinetics modelling may not hold due to irreversible floc breakup. This work investigated the influence of the coagulant/particle ratio and average velocity gradient () in the occurrence of this phenomenon with a different water matrix than previous research. Jar test assays were conducted with low (≈15 NTU), medium (≈50 NTU) and high (≈100 NTU) turbidity synthetic raw water, using alum as coagulant and kaolin as primary particles. Results were analyzed using Argaman and Kaufman's model and values for KA (aggregation constant) and KB (breakup coefficient) were determined with the evolutionary convergence method. Model fitting was satisfactory when the Al/particle ratio varied between 10 and 27 mg Al3+/g. Outside this range, residual turbidity increased after equilibrium, attributed to the irreversible floc breakup process and not adequately described by the model. A two-factor analysis of variance (ANOVA) was conducted, and the results indicated a plausible correlation between pKA (–log KA) and Al/particle ratio. As for pKB (–log KB), the results indicated a possible correlation with both Al/particle ratio and . The results suggest that the irreversible floc breakup may occur regardless of the water matrix composition.

  • Equilibrium between aggregation and breakup processes in Argaman and Kaufman's original model may not hold.

  • Residual turbidity increase was observed and attributed to the irreversible floc breakup process.

  • This phenomenon was not adequately captured by Argaman and Kaufman's original model.

  • Coagulant/particle ratio may play a critical role.

  • The irreversible floc breakup may occur regardless of the water matrix.

The flocculation process is essential to water treatment, especially when solid and liquid phases are separated via sedimentation. In this perspective, flocculation units in conventional drinking water treatment plants (DWTPs) should minimize floc breakup due to its negative impact on solid separation efficiency (AWWA 2011; Crittenden et al. 2012; Bratby 2016).

In the last few years, process modelling has become a powerful tool for design and operation. However, due to its complexity, flocculation still requires a universal model (Thomas et al. 1999; Watanabe 2017). Argaman and Kaufman's original model, although knowingly limited for design purposes, can be useful for the evaluation of existing units and routine process control since it requires only results from jar test assays (Argaman & Kaufman 1970; Bratby 2016). This is particularly interesting for DWTPs in developing countries, as they usually are not equipped with sophisticated laboratories (Di Bernardo et al. 2017; Ferreira Filho 2017).

Argaman and Kaufman developed their mechanistic model in 1970 and it was a breakthrough at the time since it comprised both aggregation and breakup processes in its formulation. As depicted by the authors, both processes occur simultaneously, and an equilibrium is eventually reached if the initial conditions are kept constant. Equation (1) presents the classic working equation for this model (AWWA 2011; Crittenden et al. 2012; Bratby 2016):
(1)
where dN/dt is the rate of change in the concentration of primary particles (ML−3T−1); is the average velocity gradient (T−1); N is the primary particles concentration at a specific time (ML−3); N0 is the initial primary particle concentration (ML−3); KA is the aggregation constant (−) and KB is the breakup coefficient (T).
Analytical integration of the working equation for a batch reactor allows to model particle concentration (Nt) at a specific time, given the values for , N0, KA, KB (Levenspiel 1999; Bratby 2016). Residual turbidity data from jar test assays can be used as a surrogate for particle concentration (Tassinari et al. 2015). Although usually referred as constants, KA (Equation (2)) and KB (Equation (3)) are, in fact, coefficients and its values should be determined experimentally for each system (Bratby 2016):
(2)
(3)

KA depends on the value of the flocculation constant KF, equivalent to 3.α.ϕ (where α is the collision efficiency factor and ϕ is the floc volume fraction); KS, a proportionality coefficient, indicates the effect of the turbulence energy spectrum on the effective diffusion coefficient; and KP is the stirrer performance coefficient (L2.T−1). KA is affected by the chemical composition (KF) and, at some level, by the mixing aspects of the system (KS and KP). In coagulation-pH fixed systems, the volume fraction, ϕ, depends on the coagulant dosage. On the other hand, the formula for KB depends on a generic breakup constant B (−); R1, which is the radius of the primary particle (L), and K2, a constant that relates the average floc size with the mean square fluctuating velocities. Two aspects stand out in Equation (3). First, the KB value is directly proportional to the value of Ф, suggesting that excessive dosages may increase the occurrence of the rupture process. Second, KB is also directly proportional to the value of KP squared, indicating that KB is more influenced by the mixing aspects of the system than KA (Argaman & Kaufman 1970; Haarhoff & Joubert 1997; Crittenden et al. 2012; Bratby 2016; Di Bernardo et al. 2017; Ferreira Filho 2017).

Despite its limitations, Argaman and Kaufman's model still holds potential for application and can provide useful information. Although the model was developed in the early 1970s, just a handful of publications report calculated values for KA and KB and an extensive database is not available (Haarhoff & Joubert 1997; Ferreira Filho et al. 2000; Di Bernardo et al. 2005; Crittenden et al. 2012; Moruzzi & de Oliveira 2013; Bratby 2016; Marques & Ferreira Filho 2017). Providing data for these coefficients is critical, especially when correlated with raw water composition and coagulant/particle ratio, as it can be useful for future studies and predictive model applications. Moreover, previous methods for determining KA and KB values were mostly manual computations (Argaman & Kaufman 1970; Bratby 1981; Haarhoff & Joubert 1997). Today, the increase of technology has brought new computational methods that can be used to calculate these coefficients. An example is the use of genetic algorithms to approach a global minimum value (Brandt 2014; Winston 2016). Lastly, Argaman and Kaufman's model was developed assuming that a permanent equilibrium between aggregation and breakup is achieved if initial conditions do not change. Recent research has shown that this equilibrium may not hold, even if initial conditions are constant, possibly giving rise to an irreversible floc breakup phenomenon (Jarvis et al. 2004, 2005a, 2005b; Marques & Ferreira Filho 2017).

Therefore, this paper aimed to investigate Argaman and Kaufman's original model seeking to identify trends in experimental results that could be related to the irreversible floc breakup phenomenon. Values for KA and KB were determined for each assay using a novel numerical approach providing additional data for future research. Main variables, such as coagulant/particle ratio and were statistically evaluated to provide new insights to model applicability.

Synthetic raw water stock preparation

To simulate variations of raw waters’ turbidity, 200 L stocks of water from the public supply system were spiked with 6.5, 24, and 48 g of kaolin, resulting in initial turbidities values of 15 (low), 50 (medium) and 100 NTU (high), respectively. A sample was collected for physical-chemical characterization from each stock prepared (Rice et al. 2012). Results are presented in the Supplementary Material section.

Flocculation kinetics assays

Flocculation kinetics assays were grouped in terms of initial turbidity of the raw water stock (low, medium, and high). Within each group, 36 assays were conducted, each combining one of six aluminum sulfate Al2(SO4)3•18H2O dosages and one of six values for flocculation. Low turbidity group doses were 10, 20, 30, 40, 60, and 80 mg·L−1 (expressed as mass of the chemical product). For the other groups (medium and high turbidity), the lower 10 mg·L−1 dose was replaced with a higher dosage of 100 mg·L−1. For all the assays, values were 20, 30, 40, 60, 80 and 100 s−1. For each coagulant dosage, a titration curve was prepared to determine the required volume of NaOH and HCl 0,1 N solutions. Coagulation pH was kept between 6.0 and 6.5 to maximize the sweep mechanism.

All the assays were conducted in a standard Nova Ética jar test device with 12 2-liter jars. Rapid mixing was kept for 30 seconds on a 236 rpm rotation (device's maximum), corresponding to a value of approximately 600 s−1 and a Camp Number of 18.000 (AWWA 2011; Crittenden et al. 2012). Alum and base (or acid) were added simultaneously in each of the 12 jars prior to the start of the rapid mixing stage. After coagulation, rotation was reduced to match the desired for flocculation. Twelve flocculation times were selected: 2.5, 5.0, 7.5, 10.0, 12.5, 15.0, 20.0, 25.0, 30.0, 40.0, 50.0 and 60.0 minutes, each one assigned to a specific jar. Once the flocculation time was reached, stirring was stopped to initiate the sedimentation process. After the non-ideal settling time (i.e. time during which the fluid inside the jars remained under agitation after the stirring stopped), the real settling time was recorded. For this experiment, 4 minutes was selected, resulting in a settling velocity (vs) of 2 cm.min−1, a typical value within the usual design criteria for conventional clarifiers in DWTPs (AWWA 2011; Crittenden et al. 2012; Ferreira Filho 2017). After settling, a sample was collected from each jar for residual turbidity (Nt) analysis. Turbidity analyses were performed using a bench scale turbidimeter (2100N from Hach). This equipment provided a ± 2% level of precision for analyses between 0 and 1000 NTU, an appropriate range for the expected experimental values. Preliminary tests indicated that turbidity results did not vary significantly if more than one measurement was taken from the same sample. Therefore, the first turbidity recorded value for each sample was used for model fitting. Turbidity was used as a surrogate parameter for particle concentration due to its analytical simplicity (Rice et al. 2012).

Model fitting and KA and KB calculation

Model fitting and KA and KB calculation were accomplished via the Least Squares Method. Electronic spreadsheets were prepared in Microsoft Excel 2016® software and the sum of the squares of the residuals (SSR) between modeled and experimental Nt/N0 data was minimized with Solver function. For this work, the evolutionary convergence method was selected since it is based on genetic algorithms and more likely to find the global minimum. The evolutionary convergence method was set with a convergence criteria of 10−6; mutation rate of 0.5; population size of 100; one random seed and 30 seconds as the maximum time without improvement. KA and KB values were set to a positive value. Model goodness-of-fit was verified with the Coefficient of Determination (CoD). A two-way factor variance analysis (ANOVA) was conducted with KA and KB values (converted to pKA and pKB) using Microsoft Excel 2016® embedded data analysis tools. A significance level of 5% (p < 0.05) was selected and both Al/particle ratio (mg Al3+/g kaolin particle) and values were selected as factors (Dobre & Sanchez Marcano 2007; Brandt 2014; Chapra & Canale 2015; Winston 2016; Von Sperling et al. 2020).

Low turbidity raw water assays

Figure 1 (left) presents model fitted curves to experimental data of assays with low-turbidity raw water (≈15 NTU), 10 mg·L−1 of alum and values of 20 and 30 s−1. The equilibrium predicted by Argaman and Kaufman's model was not achieved, although both curves seem to approach stabilization. This data indicates a prevalence of the aggregation process with minimal influence of the breakup process (supported by the practically null values of KB). CoD values of 0.96 and 0.97 (for values of 20 and 30 s−1, respectively) indicate that, although the equilibrium was not fully achieved, the model was able to reasonably represent the experimental results. Increasing value with the same dosage led to the equilibrium, as depicted on the right of Figure 1. With 40, 60, 80, and 100 s−1 the equilibrium between aggregation and breakup was achieved with approximately 30 minutes of flocculation time. Model fitting was satisfactory since CoD values were high (above 0.9 for all values). All KA and KB values, minimum Nt/N0, and CoD results are presented in the Supplementary Material for all assays.

Figure 1

Left: Model fitting to Nt/N0 results with values of 20 and 30 s−1. Right: Model fitting to Nt/N0 results with values of 40, 60, 80, and 100 s−1. All results with low-turbidity raw water (≈15 NTU), 10 mg·L−1 of alum and 2.0 cm.min−1 of settling velocity.

Figure 1

Left: Model fitting to Nt/N0 results with values of 20 and 30 s−1. Right: Model fitting to Nt/N0 results with values of 40, 60, 80, and 100 s−1. All results with low-turbidity raw water (≈15 NTU), 10 mg·L−1 of alum and 2.0 cm.min−1 of settling velocity.

Close modal

With an alum dosage of 20 mg·L−1, equilibrium was achieved with values of 20 and 30 s−1, as depicted in Figure 2. Increasing coagulant dosage usually increases KA value (Argaman & Kaufman 1970; Bratby 2016) and since KB values remained considerably low, equilibrium was achieved in a low Nt/N0 level (0.10 and 0.20) with approximately 30–35 minutes. Higher values led to equilibrium faster, however at a higher Nt/N0 value (worsen clarified water quality). Considering Argaman and Kaufman's equations, these results are reasonable since the breakup term is related to squared. Higher Nt/N0 values could reduce downstream filter performance in a conventional DWTP (AWWA 2011; Crittenden et al. 2012).

Figure 2

Model fitting to Nt/N0 results with low-turbidity raw water (≈15 NTU), 20 mg·L−1 of alum, all values and 2.0 cm.min−1 of settling velocity.

Figure 2

Model fitting to Nt/N0 results with low-turbidity raw water (≈15 NTU), 20 mg·L−1 of alum, all values and 2.0 cm.min−1 of settling velocity.

Close modal

However, a key aspect in Figure 2 is the experimental Nt/N0 increase after equilibrium, particularly notable when is 60, 80, and 100 s−1. Model curves do not follow this trend, remaining fixed at the theoretical equilibrium, thus reducing CoD values with higher (0.94, 0.97, 0.95, 0.88, 0.82 and 0.85 for 20, 30, 40, 60, 80 and 100 s−1, respectively). Argaman and Kaufman's model was developed considering floc breakup through shear effect. However, it is known today that there are other acting mechanisms, such as an irreversible floc breakup, attributed to the residual turbidity increase trend observed (Jarvis et al. 2004, 2005a, 2005b; Marques & Ferreira Filho 2017).

Higher alum dosages (30, 40, 60, and 80 mg·L−1) seemed to intensify this trend, as it became notable even in lower values, suggesting that coagulant dosage plays a critical role. It is hypothesized that in excessive dosages, metal hydroxides are fragile and may break up in an irreversible way (Jarvis et al. 2005a; Marques & Ferreira Filho 2017), not captured by Argaman and Kaufman's original model. Thus, coagulant dosage was analyzed in terms of Al/particle ratio (mg Al3+/g kaolin particle) to support this hypothesis. When alum dosage was 80 mg·L−1, the Al/particle ratio was 199 mg Al+3/g and resulted in residual turbidity increase already with equal to 20 s−1. In Figures 1 and 2, this ratio was roughly 25 and 50 mg Al3+/g, respectively. However, only in Figure 1 was the residual turbidity increase not significantly observed. Therefore, 25 mg Al+3/g was considered an optimal ratio for the low-turbidity raw water.

Medium turbidity raw water assays

In Figure 3 all values led to the equilibrium predicted in Argaman and Kaufman's model. It is notable that for values of 20, 30, and 40 s−1, the process reached equilibrium later than for the remaining values. However, increasing mixing intensity did not result in significant increase in the Nt/N0 ratio, thus indicating that the 20 mg·L−1 alum dosage (14 mg Al3+/g ratio) did not lead to the residual turbidity increase trend (attributed to the irreversible floc breakup). With alum dosages of 30 and 40 mg·L−1, the same behavior was observed (20 and 27 mg Al3+/g ratios, respectively). CoD values for all these ratios were higher than 0.9, indicating reasonable model fitting.

Figure 3

Model fitting to Nt/N0 results with low-turbidity raw water (≈50 NTU), 20 mg·L−1 of alum, all values and 2.0 cm.min−1 of settling velocity.

Figure 3

Model fitting to Nt/N0 results with low-turbidity raw water (≈50 NTU), 20 mg·L−1 of alum, all values and 2.0 cm.min−1 of settling velocity.

Close modal

However, a residual turbidity increase trend was observed with alum dosages of 60, 80, and 100 mg·L−1 as depicted in Figure 4. This indicates that the Al/particle ratios of 41, 54, and 68 mg Al3+/g, respectively, may have contributed to the irreversible floc breakup. It is interesting to note that with increasing Al/particle ratio, the residual trend is notable even with lower values. However, CoD values are considerably high for all fitted curves in Figure 4. It is assumed that the Al/particle ratio for these assays were not as high as those applied in the assays with low-turbidity raw water, resulting in less pronounced residual turbidity increase trends. This assumption supports the hypothesis that coagulant dosage plays a central role in the occurrence of this phenomenon.

Figure 4

Model fitting to Nt/N0 results with medium-turbidity raw water (≈50 NTU), 40, 60, 80, and 100 mg·L−1 of alum, all values and 2.0 cm.min−1 of settling velocity.

Figure 4

Model fitting to Nt/N0 results with medium-turbidity raw water (≈50 NTU), 40, 60, 80, and 100 mg·L−1 of alum, all values and 2.0 cm.min−1 of settling velocity.

Close modal

High turbidity raw water assays

Figure 5 shows that with an alum dosage of 20 mg·L−1 (7 mg Al3+/g ratio), the increase of residual turbidity was sharper in values of 80 and 100 s−1. The optimal range previously mentioned (14–27 mg Al3+/g ratio) suggests that lower dosages may also lead to a residual turbidity increase. This may occur since the colloidal suspension may not be fully destabilized and fragile flocs could have been formed. CoD values were still high, suggesting that the increase in residual turbidity was not as pronounced as the ones observed with excessive dosage.

Figure 5

Left: Model fitting to Nt/N0 results with 20 mg·L−1 of alum. Right: Model fitting to Nt/N0 results with 80 mg·L−1 of alum. All assays performed with high-turbidity raw water (≈100 NTU), all values and 2.0 cm.min−1 of settling velocity.

Figure 5

Left: Model fitting to Nt/N0 results with 20 mg·L−1 of alum. Right: Model fitting to Nt/N0 results with 80 mg·L−1 of alum. All assays performed with high-turbidity raw water (≈100 NTU), all values and 2.0 cm.min−1 of settling velocity.

Close modal

With alum dosages of 30, 40 and 60 mg·L−1, the increase of residual turbidity was not significant, and CoD values were above 0.9 for all values. The Al/particle ratios were 10, 14, and 20, respectively, suggesting that the previously mentioned range could be expanded from 10 to 27 mg Al3+/g. However, with 80 mg·L−1 alum dosage (27 mg Al3+/g ratio) the residual turbidity increase trend was observed (Figure 5) even though CoD values were still high (above 0.9 for all ). This indicates that the trend in residual turbidity was again not so noticeable and the 27 mg Al3+/g ratio may be slightly above the upper limit in which this trend would not be observed. The residual turbidity trend was again observed with 100 mg·L−1 dosage of alum (34 mg Al3+/g ratio), supporting the aforementioned range.

Results overview

Figure 6 shows the contour of minimum Nt/N0 values and CoD values as a function of both and Al/particle ratio. The lowest minimum Nt/N0 values are in the left side of the contour (near the optimal range of 10–27 mg Al3+/g ratio). Increasing in this area does not directly reflect in higher minimum Nt/N0 values. However, increasing Al/particle ratio produces higher minimum Nt/Nt values even with lower values. Therefore, within the optimal Al/particle ratio range flocs were not easily broken even with increasing mixing intensity. With excessive dosages, however, there is a predominance of hydroxide precipitates, usually fragile and more susceptible to breakage. On the other hand, higher CoD values are in the lower left side of the contour, the same region as the lowest Nt/N0 values. When Al/particle ratio increases, CoD values reduce, indicating poorer model fitting. Since experimental results indicated that higher Al/particle ratio led to the occurrence of the residual turbidity increase trend, this observation indicates that Argaman and Kaufman's original model may not be able to represent this phenomenon with high precision. As previously mentioned, it is assumed that the residual turbidity increase may be related to the irreversible floc breakup process, not considered in the original model formulation (Jarvis et al. 2005a; Marques & Ferreira Filho 2017).

Figure 6

Minimum Nt/N0 and CoD values as function of and Al/particle ratio.

Figure 6

Minimum Nt/N0 and CoD values as function of and Al/particle ratio.

Close modal

Lastly, it is notable that the irreversible floc breakup was identified in all groups of assays (low, medium, and high turbidity raw water). Previous research has identified this phenomenon in particular water matrixes, such as the one used by Marques & Ferreira Filho (2017). In their work, the authors identified the irreversible floc breakup when studying flocculation kinetics of cyanobacteria contaminated water, a particular case of fragile flocs subjectable to breakup. All the assays described in this work were conducted with potable water spiked with kaolin particles, a rather common representation of surface water in lab scale. Therefore, it is possible that the irreversible floc breakup may occur regardless of the water matrix composition and should be accounted for in terms of flocculation process modelling.

KA and KB values and ANOVA results

All KA and KB values (also converted into pKA and pKB, respectively) are presented in the Supplementary Material. For the low-turbidity raw water assays, pKB values were considerably higher (thus lower KB) when Al/particle ratio was near 25 mg Al3+/g and was 20 and 30 s−1. As previously mentioned, in those assays the equilibrium depicted by Argaman and Kaufman's model was not fully achieved, indicating a prevalence of the aggregation process with minimal breakup. Increasing led to lower pKB values and the equilibrium shown in Figure 2. With Al/particle ratios of 50 and 75 mg Al3+/g, pKB values were near 6 and 7 and with Al/particle ratios of 100, 150 and 200 mg Al3+/g, pKB values oscillated between 5 and 6. Considering previous observations, this could reflect a greater incidence of the irreversible breakup process, since it was previously identified in assays with excessive dosage. As for pKA, with Al/particle ratios of 25, 50, and 75 mg Al3+/g, its values were around 4. With higher Al/particle ratios, pKA values oscillated between 3 and 4, reflecting the expected effect of increasing KA with higher coagulant dosages.

As for the assays with medium-turbidity raw water, pKB values were significantly higher when the Al/particle ratio was 14, 20, and 27 mg Al3+/g, in agreement with the previously mentioned range. Increasing value within these ratios led to lower pKB values, indicating a greater incidence of the breakup process. Higher Al/particle led to a minimal reduction in pKB values, thus suggesting that increasing coagulant dosage had a minor effect on the breakup process in these assays. As for pKA, all values were near 4 within the entire Al/particle range, indicating that increasing coagulant dosage did not reflect significantly higher KA values.

Within the assays with high turbidity raw water, it is notable that with the Al/particle ratio of 7 mg Al3+/g the breakup process was evident, since pKB values were not the highest. As previously mentioned, this Al/particle ratio may not be adequate to promote colloidal particle destabilization, thus producing fragile flocs. With Al/particle ratio of 10, 14, 20, and 27 mg Al3+/g, the assays with of 20 s−1 had the highest pKB values. It is interesting to note that with 27 mg Al3+/g the pKB value in the assay with value of 20 s−1 was still higher than with the other values. However, it is considerably smaller than the pKB values with 10, 14, and 20 Al/particle ratios. It is assumed that the 27 mg Al3+/g ratio may be the upper limit in the optimal range. With the highest Al/particle ratio (34 mg Al3+/g), slightly lower pKB values were obtained, indicating a higher incidence of the breakup process without an apparent pattern with respect to . Considering the optimal range previously mentioned, it can be assumed that the 34 mg Al3+/g ratio was excessive and therefore more likely to produce hydroxide flocs susceptible to irreversible breakup. However, since this ratio was not excessive as the ones applied in the low-turbidity raw water assays, the effect is less noticeable. Again, pKA values remained near 4, except for the highest Al/particle ratio.

Table 1

ANOVA results for pKA and pKB values

Source of VariationSSDfMSFP-valueFcrit
pKA       
Al/particle ratio 11.035 17 0.649 11.143 3.68 × 10−5 1.744 
 0.322 0.064 1.106 0.363 2.322 
Error 4.951 85 0.058 – – – 
Total 16.308 107 – – – – 
pKB       
Al/particle ratio 513.560 17 30.209 6.721 7.86 × 10−10 1.744 
 159.247 31.849 7.086 1.40 × 10−05 2.322 
Error 382.075 85 4.495 – – – 
Total 1054.881 107 – – – – 
Source of VariationSSDfMSFP-valueFcrit
pKA       
Al/particle ratio 11.035 17 0.649 11.143 3.68 × 10−5 1.744 
 0.322 0.064 1.106 0.363 2.322 
Error 4.951 85 0.058 – – – 
Total 16.308 107 – – – – 
pKB       
Al/particle ratio 513.560 17 30.209 6.721 7.86 × 10−10 1.744 
 159.247 31.849 7.086 1.40 × 10−05 2.322 
Error 382.075 85 4.495 – – – 
Total 1054.881 107 – – – – 

A two-factor ANOVA without replication was conducted with pKA and pKB values, considering Al/particle and as factors, presented in Table 1. Results indicated that a correlation may exist between pKA values and the Al/particle ratio, which was expected since in Argaman and Kaufman's model KA is proportional to floc volume and, therefore, to coagulant dosage. ANOVA also indicated that a correlation between pKA and was not clear. Considering that KA is proportional to Ks and KP (Equation (2)), it is assumed that all values promoted sufficient particle collision. Therefore, coagulant dosage was the variable that influenced KA the most (AWWA 2011; Crittenden et al. 2012; Bratby 2016).

ANOVA also indicated that there may be a correlation between pKB and Al/particle as well as between pKB and . Equation (3) shows that the KB value is directly influenced by Kp squared, thus it is more sensitive to mixing conditions. However, it is interesting to note a possible correlation between pKB and Al/particle ratio. Coagulant dosage is usually mentioned when discussing KA and the aggregation process. However, it is reasonable to expect that coagulant dosage may also influence the breakup process, since it is the metal ion and its hydrolysis products that allow floc formation. Argaman and Kaufman's model is constructed in such a way that KB is influenced by coagulant dosage, as previously mentioned when discussing Equation (3) (KB is related to floc volume and, therefore, to coagulant dosage). However, the model is not able to represent the residual turbidity increase trend identified in this work, attributed to the irreversible floc breakup. A modification of the original model, including a specific term for this process may result in better fitting to experimental results in these conditions (Marques & Ferreira Filho 2017).

In this work, flocculation kinetics of different turbidity raw water was studied using Argaman and Kaufman's original model. Most of the experimental results were satisfactorily described by the model with high CoD values. However, in certain conditions a residual turbidity increase trend was observed, not adequately described by the model. This trend was attributed to the irreversible floc breakup process and was more pronounced when coagulant dosage resulted in Al/particle ratios outside an optimal range of 10 and 27 mg Al3+/g. The value was also an important factor, since increasing mixing intensified the observed trend. Since it was identified in all groups of assays, it is possible that the irreversible floc breakup may occur regardless of the water matrix composition and should be accounted for in terms of flocculation process modeling. Model coefficients KA and KB values were calculated, and the results reflected experimental observations. It is recommended to analyze this works results with different flocculation models for better representation of the irreversible floc breakup process. One promising approach is applying the modified version of Argaman and Kaufman's model presented by Marques & Ferreira Filho (2017). This is going to be the topic of future research.

All relevant data are included in the paper or its Supplementary Information.

Argaman
Y.
&
Kaufman
W. J.
1970
Turbulence and flocculation
.
J. Sanit. Eng. Div.
96
,
223
241
.
AWWA
2011
Water Quality and Treatment: A Handbook on Drinking Water
, 6th edn.
McGraw Hill
,
New York
,
USA
.
Brandt
S.
2014
Data Analysis – Statistical and Computational Methods for Scientists and Engineers
, 4th edn.
Springer International Publishing Switzerland
,
New York
,
USA
.
Bratby
J. R.
2016
Coagulation and Flocculation in Water and Wastewater Treatment
, 3rd edn.
IWA Publishing
,
London
,
UK
.
Chapra
S. C.
&
Canale
R. P.
2015
Numerical Methods for Engineers
, 7th edn.
McGraw-Hill Education
,
New York
,
USA
.
Crittenden
J. C.
,
Trussell
R. R.
,
Hand
D. W.
,
Howe
K. J.
&
Tchobanoglous
G.
2012
MWH's Water Treatment: Principles and Design
, 3rd edn.
John Wiley & Sons Inc.
,
Hoboken
,
USA
.
Di Bernardo
L.
,
Dantas
A. D. B.
&
Voltan
P. E. N.
2017
Métodos e Técnicas de Tratamento de Água
, 3rd edn.
LDiBe Editora
,
São Carlos
,
Brazil
.
Dobre
T. G.
&
Sanchez Marcano
J. G.
2007
Chemical Engineering: Modelling, Simulation and Similitude
, 1st edn.
WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co.
,
Weinheim
,
Germany
.
Ferreira Filho
S. S.
2017
Tratamento de Água: Concepção, projeto e operação de estações de tratamento
, 1st edn.
Elsevier Editora Ltda.
,
Rio de Janeiro
,
Brazil
.
Ferreira Filho
S. S.
,
Hespanhol
I.
&
Moreira
H. A.
2000
Flocculation Kinetics of Colloidal Suspensions: Effects of Metallic Coagulant Dosage and Primary Particle Concentration on the Breakup and Aggregation Constants
. In:
Chemical Water and Wastewater Treatment VI: Proceedings of the 9th Gothenburg Symposium
.
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
,
New York
, pp.
101
109
.
Jarvis
P.
,
Jefferson
B.
&
Parsons
S.
2004
The duplicity of floc strength
.
Water Sci. Technol.
50
,
63
70
.
Jarvis
P.
,
Jefferson
B.
,
Gregory
J.
&
Parsons
S. A.
2005a
A review of floc strength and breakage
.
Water Res.
39
,
3121
3137
.
Jarvis
P.
,
Jefferson
B.
&
Parsons
S. A.
2005b
Breakage, regrowth, and fractal nature of natural organic matter flocs
.
Environ. Sci. Technol.
39
,
2307
2314
.
Levenspiel
O.
1999
Chemical Reaction Engineering
, 3rd edn.
John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
,
New York
,
USA
.
Moruzzi
R. B.
&
de Oliveira
S. C.
2013
Mathematical modeling and analysis of the flocculation process in chambers in series
.
Bioprocess Biosyst. Eng.
36
,
357
363
.
Rice
E. W.
,
Baird
R. B.
,
Eaton
A. D.
&
Clesceri
L.
2012
Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater
, 22nd edn.
American Publich Health Association, American Water Works Association, Water Environment Federation
,
Washington
,
USA
.
Tassinari
B.
,
Conaghan
S.
,
Freeland
B.
&
Marison
I. W.
2015
Application of turbidity meters for the quantitative analysis of flocculation in a Jar test apparatus
.
J. Environ. Eng.
141
,
1
8
.
Thomas
D. N.
,
Judd
S. J.
&
Fawcett
N.
1999
Flocculation modelling: a review
.
Water Res.
33
,
1579
1592
.
Von Sperling
M.
,
Verbyla
M. E.
&
Oliveira
S. M. A. C.
2020
Assessment of Treatment Plant Performance and Water Quality Data – A Guide for Students, Researchers and Practitioners
, 1st edn.
IWA Publishing
,
London
,
UK
.
Watanabe
Y.
2017
Flocculation and me
.
Water Res.
114
,
88
103
.
Winston
W. L.
2016
Microsoft Excel 2016 - Data Analysis and Business Modeling
, 1st edn.
Microsoft Press
,
Redmond
,
USA
.
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Licence (CC BY 4.0), which permits copying, adaptation and redistribution, provided the original work is properly cited (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

Supplementary data