Hydrological processes such as evaporation, infiltration, and runoff are affected not only by natural climate change but also by land cover and soil conditions. The impact of urbanization on the key elements of the hydrological process is worth studying in the context of rapid urbanization. This paper combines the soil-land use index grid and the GSSHA model to quantitatively study the impact of land use on urban hydrological processes under the background of the changing urbanization stage. The results show that with the increase in land development and utilization activities, the hydrological process will transform. When grassland and woodland are converted to construction land, the changes in runoff, infiltration, and evaporation are the largest. The runoff depth increased by 0.94 × 10−1 ∼ 2.42 × 10−1 mm/km2, infiltration depth decreased by 0.80 × 10−1 ∼ 2.18 × 10−1 mm/km2, and evaporation decreased by 0.14 × 10−1 ∼ 0.28 × 10−1 mm/km2. In the transition from forest land to grassland, from cultivated land to forest land, and from cultivated land to grassland, the increase of infiltration contributed over 80% to the decrease of runoff process. This provides a scientific basis for future urban planning and sponge city construction.

  • This paper combines the soil-land use index grid and the GSSHA model to quantitatively study the impact of land use on urban hydrological processes under the background of the changing urbanization stage.

Graphical Abstract

Graphical Abstract

Urbanization is an important indicator to measure the development level of a country or region (Al-Zahrani 2018; Gao et al. 2018).With the rapid development of economic construction and the continuous increase of urbanization level, its influence on the hydrological process may not be ignored (Ren et al. 2006; Wang et al. 2020). On the one hand, in the context of increasing extreme weather, climate change will have a significant impact on hydrological processes (de Moraes et al. 2018). Many studies have shown that climate change altered regional hydrological conditions, and cities amplified the hydrological changes of natural watersheds (Changnon 1979; Jauregui 1995; Wu & Huang 2009; Mei 2019). On the other hand, in the process of urbanization, a large amount of agricultural land or other non-urban land is converted into impervious land, and land-use change completely alters the natural hydrological process (Hu et al. 2020; Kastridis et al. 2020). Changes in urban land cover will lead to changes in the process of runoff generation, and significant changes in runoff depth (net rainfall), evaporation, and infiltration (Liu et al. 2014; Xu et al. 2021; Zhao et al. 2021). Therefore, it is important to study the hydrological effects of cities quantitatively and qualitatively. It plays an important role in flood warning, water resources planning and management, and urban planning and management (Leandro et al. 2016; Martins et al. 2018). But these changes are hard to describe quantitatively.

At present, to quantitatively analyze the impact of urbanization on the process of runoff generation, urbanization is regarded as a process by most studies, and the impervious area is selected as an indicator to measure the impact of urbanization on the process of runoff generation (Shi et al. 2001; Zhang 2013; Brendel et al. 2021). Brun & Band (2000) studied the changes in the runoff process of the Upper Gwens Falls Basin in Baltimore, Massachusetts, USA from 1973 to 1990 based on the HSPF model. The study found that the impact of urbanization on the runoff process increased with the development of urbanization. When the impervious area reached 20% of the entire basin, the runoff process has a more significant change. Wang & Cheng (2002) analyzed the runoff process after urbanization in Hangzhou and also found that under the condition that the impervious area exceeds 20% of the total area, the runoff caused by the design rainfall once in three years has increased by 50%–100%. Bhaduri et al. (2000) developed a long-term hydrological impact assessment (L-THIA) model using the curve number (CN) method to simulate the rainfall-runoff process changes in the Kitty Hawk River Basin from 1973 to 1991, and found that impervious areas And the construction of drainage systems increases the impact of urbanization on runoff processes.

However, in urbanization, how land-use change affects the hydrological process is very complicated, and it will impact all aspects of the runoff process (Al-Zahrani 2018; Du 2020). In addition, urban resources (i.e., population, impervious area, building density, green space, etc.) are unevenly distributed in urban areas. Therefore, the redistribution of rainfall-runoff becomes more complicated and highly dependent on temporal and spatial distribution and land-use changes (Sarauskiene et al. 2020; Wang et al. 2020). Therefore, simply taking the area of impervious area as a research index cannot represent accurate qualitative and quantitative research. There is a need for a systematic approach, combining different land use types and soil types, and based on more accurate hourly rainfall and runoff data, to quantitatively analyze the impact of unbalanced resource distribution within cities on hydrological processes.

Zhengzhou, as one of the central cities in China, has developed rapidly in urbanization in recent years. Different development stages of the city are obvious, and there is a certain regional imbalance phenomenon. Meanwhile, Zhengzhou has a good network of rain stations and hydrologic stations, which can provide complete research data. In this paper, we take the Jialu River Basin as the research area (including the downtown area of Zhengzhou) and divide the research route into 3 steps. (1) We build a Gridded Surface/Subsurface Hydrologic Analysis Model (GSSHA) of the soil-land use index grid. (2) Use the measured precipitation-discharge data to calibrate and verify the parameters of the model. (3) Finally, the impact of land use on key urban hydrological process elements such as evaporation, infiltration and runoff depth is quantitatively described to provide a scientific basis for guiding urban development (Figure 1).

Study site

In this study, Zhongmou station control basin was used as the study area, with a total area of 2,276.9 km2, including the urban area of Zhengzhou's downtown area of 1,008 km2, accounting for 44%. The average annual rainfall in the basin is 642.3 mm. The rainfall from June to September accounts for 60% to 70% of the annual rainfall, mostly short-term heavy rainfall. The annual average temperature is 14.5 °C (Du 2020). There are 31 rainfall stations and 8 weather stations in the basin, which can accurately reflect the spatial distribution and changes of rainfall.

Figure 1

Research frame diagram.

Figure 1

Research frame diagram.

Close modal

In the basin controlled by the Zhongmou hydrological station, the urban area is mainly concentrated in Zhengzhou, so only the impact of the Zhengzhou incident on the production and confluence process of the basin is considered. In the natural watershed outside the city, the water system is less disturbed by human activities. The water system based on elevation analysis can better reflect the actual situation of the basin, and the water system extracted by the TOPAZ system is used. In urban areas, the water system extracted by the TOPAZ system has been adjusted to adapt to the water system in the urban planning map. ArcGIS to get the elevation of the connection point of the rainwater utilities network and the length between the connection points to calculate the slope. Based on the above method and the obtained data, a land-based confluence model of the basin controlled by the Zhongmu Hydrological Station with a resolution of 1 km × 1 km was established (Figure 2).

Figure 2

Location of study area and diagram of overland confluence patterns.

Figure 2

Location of study area and diagram of overland confluence patterns.

Close modal

Data sources

Land use data

To analyze the dynamic changes of land use distribution during urbanization, satellite remote sensing images of 1998, 2003, and 2008 (data from geospatial data cloud, resolution 30 m × 30 m, acquisition months from May to October) were selected. ENVI and ArcGIS were used to process and analyze remote sensing data based on the classification regression tree (CART) algorithm. The CART algorithm can select variables related to classification and improve the accuracy of land use extraction (Chen et al. 2008). Zhengzhou city has a high degree of land use. According to this characteristic, the land use types are divided into construction land, cultivated land, grassland, forest land, and water area.

Soil data

With the acceleration of Zhengzhou's urbanization process, the urban area sped up its expansion around 1998. Based on this, the urbanization process of Zhengzhou city was divided into a slow urbanization period before 1998 and a sped-up urbanization period after 1998, and the influence of different urbanization development periods on the hydrological process was analyzed (Wang et al. 2020). From 1971 to 1998, urban development in the basin was relatively balanced and land-use change was slow. The land use data at the end of 1998 were used to simulate land use distribution from 1999 to 2012, urban areas expanded rapidly, the land-use conversion rate was fast, and inter-regional development imbalance intensified.

To accurately simulate the land-use situation at this stage, land use data were updated every five years. The watershed grid index map was generated from land use and soil data in 1998, 2003, and 2008, as shown in Figure 3. Among them, the soil data is based on the soil type file in the NRCS SSURGO soil database, and the elevation data of the watershed controlled by the Zhongmu Hydrological Station is processed through ArcGIS (Figure 4).

Figure 3

(a) Watershed land use grid index map and (b) index map of watershed soil-land use combination network.

Figure 3

(a) Watershed land use grid index map and (b) index map of watershed soil-land use combination network.

Close modal
Figure 4

Soil types in the study area.

Figure 4

Soil types in the study area.

Close modal

Rainfall data

Data Used for Calibration and Validation

The rainfall data came from 31 rainfall stations in Zhengzhou, and the average rainfall in the study area was analyzed by the Thiessen polygon method. The rainfall from 1997 to 1998 was selected in the model simulation period, and the rainfall from 1971 to 1972 and 2003 to 2004 was selected in the model verification period (Table 1).

Different rainfall events in the simulation period and the verification period can well reflect the characteristics of the rainfall process in the watershed controlled by the Zhongmu Hydrological Station. The average rainfall is between 18.29 mm and 181.83 mm, the average rainfall intensity is between 0.69 mm/h and 3.55 mm/h, and the maximum rainfall intensity in one hour is between 1.84 mm/h and 21.65 mm/h. The rainfall in 2003062914 and 2004071520 events reached torrential rain level, and the maximum rain intensity in 1 hour reached 15.67 mm/h and 21.65 mm/h respectively.

Table 1

Statistical table of rainfall characteristics

PeriodRainfall eventsRainfall (mm)Rainfall duration (h)Mean rainfall intensity (mm/h)Maximum rainfall intensity (mm/h)
Verification period Slow urbanization stage 1971062810 48.40 24 2.02 6.92 
1971070700 41.56 60 0.69 6.76 
1972072820 181.83 62 2.93 8.77 
1972083122 89.33 36 2.48 5.58 
Simulation period The turning stage of urbanization development 1997071316 18.29 16 1.14 1.84 
1997080117 22.53 15 1.50 5.11 
1997091201 70.50 62 1.14 5.14 
1998070702 45.71 30 1.52 6.90 
1998071516 39.75 27 1.47 4.72 
1998082109 22.73 2.84 7.18 
Verification period Rapid urbanization stage 2003062914 81.69 23 3.55 15.67 
2003082520 178.67 65 2.75 11.70 
2004071520 34.02 27 1.26 21.65 
2004081511 55.18 32 1.72 9.80 
PeriodRainfall eventsRainfall (mm)Rainfall duration (h)Mean rainfall intensity (mm/h)Maximum rainfall intensity (mm/h)
Verification period Slow urbanization stage 1971062810 48.40 24 2.02 6.92 
1971070700 41.56 60 0.69 6.76 
1972072820 181.83 62 2.93 8.77 
1972083122 89.33 36 2.48 5.58 
Simulation period The turning stage of urbanization development 1997071316 18.29 16 1.14 1.84 
1997080117 22.53 15 1.50 5.11 
1997091201 70.50 62 1.14 5.14 
1998070702 45.71 30 1.52 6.90 
1998071516 39.75 27 1.47 4.72 
1998082109 22.73 2.84 7.18 
Verification period Rapid urbanization stage 2003062914 81.69 23 3.55 15.67 
2003082520 178.67 65 2.75 11.70 
2004071520 34.02 27 1.26 21.65 
2004081511 55.18 32 1.72 9.80 
Typical Rainfall

Under different rainfall distribution characteristics, the impact of land-use change on the hydrological process is different. Therefore, it is necessary to analyze the influence of urbanization on hydrological processes under the condition of controlling soil moisture degree in rainfall basins. The rainfall process of 1978063023, 1998081404, and 2003082520 in the rainfall center of the lower, middle, and upper parts of the basin can reflect the scenarios of most rainfall processes in the basin, so it is selected as a typical rainfall process, and the time distribution characteristics are shown in Table 2. Spatial distribution is shown in Figure 5.

Table 2

Table of typical rainfall time characteristics

Rainfall eventsAverage rainfall (mm)Mean rainfall duration (h)Mean rainfall intensity (mm/h)
1978063023 171.74 86 2.00 
1998081404 37.81 28 1.35 
2003082520 178.67 65 2.75 
Rainfall eventsAverage rainfall (mm)Mean rainfall duration (h)Mean rainfall intensity (mm/h)
1978063023 171.74 86 2.00 
1998081404 37.81 28 1.35 
2003082520 178.67 65 2.75 
Table 3

Model parameter table

ModuleSelected methodParameterRanges
Evaporation module Deardroff method Land surface albedo 0–1 
Infiltration module Redistribution Green-Ampt model Hydraulic conductivity 0.01–15 
Capillary head 0–20 
Porosity 0–1 
Pore Distribution Index 0–1 
Residual moisture content 0–1 
Field capacity 0–1 
Wither point 0.03–0.25 
Initial soil moisture content 0–1 
Bus module 2D slope convergence Surface roughness 0.001–1 
– Channel type/Pipe type – 
Diffuse wave Channel manning coefficient 0–1 
Diffuse wave Pipeline manning coefficient 0–1 
– Depth – 
– Slope – 
ModuleSelected methodParameterRanges
Evaporation module Deardroff method Land surface albedo 0–1 
Infiltration module Redistribution Green-Ampt model Hydraulic conductivity 0.01–15 
Capillary head 0–20 
Porosity 0–1 
Pore Distribution Index 0–1 
Residual moisture content 0–1 
Field capacity 0–1 
Wither point 0.03–0.25 
Initial soil moisture content 0–1 
Bus module 2D slope convergence Surface roughness 0.001–1 
– Channel type/Pipe type – 
Diffuse wave Channel manning coefficient 0–1 
Diffuse wave Pipeline manning coefficient 0–1 
– Depth – 
– Slope – 
Figure 5

Spatial distribution map of rainfall.

Figure 5

Spatial distribution map of rainfall.

Close modal

GSSHA model

The GSSHA model is a physical-based distributed hydrological model developed and improved by the US Army Engineering Research and Development Center based on the CASC2D model (Li et al. 2017). GSSHA can be coupled with the SUPERLINK module to simulate rainwater pipe drainage flow (Brendel et al. 2021). It is based on 10–1,000 m grid cells, runs on a digital elevation model (DEM), uses finite difference and finite volume methods for each grid cell and channel reach, and simulates surface and groundwater flow, channel flow, channels, rainwater pipe network, evapotranspiration, various hydraulic structures, and nutrient (pollutant) transport scenarios, solve the physics-based partial differential equations describing the runoff process, which can describe the micro-topography, canopy interception, infiltration and Evapotranspiration, two-dimensional overland flow, and one-dimensional channel evolution, mainly including watershed analysis module, precipitation model block, evaporation module, infiltration module, confluence module and water exchange module.

This paper uses DEM data with a resolution of 30 m × 30 m to construct the hydrogeographic base of the basin runoff generation model and extract the flow direction of each channel. Considering the actual situation in the study area, the Deardroff method was selected in the evaporation module. The method parameters are simple, the method has strong applicability, and the required data is easy to obtain; selects the Redistribution Green-Ampt Model, considering the redistribution of soil water to calculate the runoff infiltration process in the infiltration module. The model's built-in multilevel single-linkage (MLSL) method is used to automatically calibrate model parameters using measured rainfall and its corresponding flow data, this method is selected in the optimization module for optimization (Table 3).

Generation of watershed index grid

The generation of the river basin network index is the most basic link of the GSSHA model. Firstly, a grid of 10–1,000 m is established according to the actual situation of the watershed, natural geographical conditions, and underlying surface conditions. Then, it is classified according to the unique characteristics of the grid's land-use type, soil type, or combination of land use and soil to generate a watershed grid index. The detailed description of the micro-topography, canopy interception, infiltration, and evapotranspiration is completed by setting the grid parameters. The water produced by the grid is discharged out of the basin through the runoff confluence path.

Model indexes

The Nash efficiency coefficient (NSE), relative error of flood peak (REP), and relative error of runoff (RER) for model calibration were selected, and the coefficient of determination (r2) used for model evaluation.

  • (1)

    Nash-Sutcliffe efficiency coefficient (NSE)

The mathematical expressions of this metric can be described as follows (Nash & Sutcliffe 1970):
(1)
where (m3/s) is the actual runoff flow in the watershed at time t, (m3/s) is the runoff flow of the simulated watershed at time t; (m3/s) is the average value of the measured runoff flow at different times t; is the time period. NSE measures the ability of the model to predict variables different from the mean, gives the proportion of the initial variance accounted for by the model, and ranges from 1 (perfect fit) to -∞. Values closer to 1 provide more accurate predictions (Gupta et al. 1999).
  • (2)

    Relative error of flood peak (REP)

REP is often used to analyze the fitting degree of simulated hydrological process and measure hydrological process peak (Moriasi et al. 2007):
(2)
where (m3/s) is the peak flow of measured runoff process at the outlet of the basin, and (m3/s) is the simulated peak flow of runoff process at the outlet of the basin.
  • (3)

    Relative error of runoff (RER)

RER is often used to analyze the degree of fitting between simulated hydrological process and measured hydrological process in total runoff (Gupta et al. 1999).
(3)
where (mm) is the runoff calculated according to the measured runoff process in the basin, (mm) is the runoff calculated according to the simulated runoff process.
  • (4)

    The coefficient of determination (r2)

r2 is often used to describe the degree of fit between data. When r2 is closer to 1, it means that the reference value of the related equation is higher; on the contrary, when it is closer to 0, it means that the reference value is lower. It is described as follows (Jackson et al. 2019):
(4)
where n is the total number of measured data, (mm) is the simulated water depth for data point i, (mm) is the measured water depth for data point i, (mm) is the averaged value of the simulated water depth, and (mm) is the averaged value of the measured water depth (Jackson et al. 2019).

Contribution rate calculation method

Evaporation process contribution rate and infiltration process contribution rate are used to analyze and measure the contribution of infiltration process change and evaporation process change in runoff process changes of different land use types respectively.
(5)
where (mm) is the mean value of runoff depth variation, (mm) is the mean value of evaporation change.
(6)
where (mm) is the mean value of variation of infiltration depth.

Model calibration and evaluation

Based on the 6 flood events at regular intervals, the MLSL method was used to calibrate the model parameters (Yang et al. 2021). The model regularly simulates the hydrological process of the Zhongmou hydrological station control basin with an NSE above 0.80, and the REP is 6.35%-14.76%. The relative error of flood volume is between −2.86% and 10.16%. The calibration results are shown in Figure 6 and Table 4.

Table 4

Calibration results of simulation period

Flood eventsNSEREPRER
1997071316 0.86 8.37% 8.79% 
1997080117 0.88 14.76% −2.86% 
1997091201 0.82 13.58% 6.84% 
1998070702 0.84 8.22% 6.49% 
1998071516 0.81 6.35% 10.16% 
1998082109 0.82 11.53% 5.63% 
Flood eventsNSEREPRER
1997071316 0.86 8.37% 8.79% 
1997080117 0.88 14.76% −2.86% 
1997091201 0.82 13.58% 6.84% 
1998070702 0.84 8.22% 6.49% 
1998071516 0.81 6.35% 10.16% 
1998082109 0.82 11.53% 5.63% 
Figure 6

Simulated flow fitting result and mesured flow for the calibration period.

Figure 6

Simulated flow fitting result and mesured flow for the calibration period.

Close modal

The 8 flood events during the verification period were input into the model to get the simulated runoff process and then analyzed with the runoff data measured by the Zhongmou hydrological station. The result proves that the calibrated model can well simulate the hydrological process in the basin controlled by the Zhongmou Hydrological Station. In the verification period, the NSE is above 0.79, the REP is between −12.35% and 12.99%, and the relative error of flood volume is between −10.64% and 10.39%. The verification results are shown in Figure 7 and Table 5.

Table 5

Validation period results

PeriodFlood eventsNSEREPRER
Slow development 1971062810 0.79 8.73% −10.64% 
1971070700 0.80 8.74% 10.39% 
1972072820 0.82 12.99% 7.00% 
1972083122 0.81 10.16% 8.49% 
Rapid development 2003062914 0.82 9.15% 6.56% 
2003082520 0.79 13.48% 6.16% 
2004071520 0.79 −12.35% 9.77% 
2004081511 0.88 10.23% −7.76% 
PeriodFlood eventsNSEREPRER
Slow development 1971062810 0.79 8.73% −10.64% 
1971070700 0.80 8.74% 10.39% 
1972072820 0.82 12.99% 7.00% 
1972083122 0.81 10.16% 8.49% 
Rapid development 2003062914 0.82 9.15% 6.56% 
2003082520 0.79 13.48% 6.16% 
2004071520 0.79 −12.35% 9.77% 
2004081511 0.88 10.23% −7.76% 
Figure 7

Simulated flow fitting result and measured flow for the validation period.

Figure 7

Simulated flow fitting result and measured flow for the validation period.

Close modal

We scatter the observed and simulated discharge values (Figure 8(a)). The value of r2 is 0.87, showing that this model could well reflect the relationship between observed and simulated discharge. Besides, the value is almost near the fit line in the model. However, the model appears some abnormal values. The reason for this phenomenon is that the model has some fluctuations under the sudden changes in rainfall and discharge data. Also, the fitting effect of the cumulative distribution function (Figure 8(b)) is very good, which reflects the good simulation effect of this model.

Figure 8

Scatter plot (a) and cumulative distribution function (b) of observed and simulated discharge during 8 validation flood events.

Figure 8

Scatter plot (a) and cumulative distribution function (b) of observed and simulated discharge during 8 validation flood events.

Close modal

Effects of urbanization on hydrological processes

Runoff depth change

The changes of a runoff depth corresponding to 1978063023, 1998081404, and 2003082520 rainfall events under the land use distribution in 1993, 1998, 2003, and 2008 were statistically analyzed, and the results were shown in Figure 9. Combined with the change of land use distribution, ArcGIS was used to analyze the simulated runoff depth data, and the results are shown in Table 6.

Table 6

Effect of land-use change on runoff depth (10−1 mm/km2)

Land-use changeRunoff depth variation
forest-grass land 0.43 ∼ 0.54 
forest-cultivated land 0.55 ∼ 0.80 
forest-building land 1.76 ∼ 2.42 
grass land-forest −0.75 ∼ −0.5 
grass land-cultivated land 0.43 ∼ 0.54 
grass land-building land 1.34 ∼ 1.75 
cultivated land-water body 1.76 ∼ 2.42 
cultivated land-grass land −0.51 ∼ 0.00 
cultivated land-building land 0.81 ∼ 1.33 
Land-use changeRunoff depth variation
forest-grass land 0.43 ∼ 0.54 
forest-cultivated land 0.55 ∼ 0.80 
forest-building land 1.76 ∼ 2.42 
grass land-forest −0.75 ∼ −0.5 
grass land-cultivated land 0.43 ∼ 0.54 
grass land-building land 1.34 ∼ 1.75 
cultivated land-water body 1.76 ∼ 2.42 
cultivated land-grass land −0.51 ∼ 0.00 
cultivated land-building land 0.81 ∼ 1.33 
Figure 9

Diagram of runoff depth variation.

Figure 9

Diagram of runoff depth variation.

Close modal

Comparing the data in the above table, it is found that the change of runoff depth is not only related to the degree of land development and utilization but also affected by the surface roughness. When other land types were converted to building land, the change of runoff depth was greater than grassland, woodland, and cultivated land. The runoff depth increases by 0.94 × 10−1 ∼ 2.42 × 10−1 mm/km2 when other land-use types are converted to building land. The runoff depth varies from −0.67 × 10−1 to 1.19 × 10−1 mm/km2 when other land uses convert to each other.

The runoff decreased by 0.43 × 10−1 ∼ 0.64 × 10−1 mm/km2 when grassland was converted into forest land. In converting cropland to forest and grassland, the runoff depth decreases by 0.49 × 10−1 ∼ 0.73 × 10−1 mm/km2 when the cropland is converted to the forest and 0.44 × 10−1 ∼ 0.67 × 10−1 mm when the cropland is converted to grassland.

Infiltration change

The corresponding changes of infiltration depth of 1978063023, 1998081404, and 2003082520 rainfall events under land use distribution in 1993, 1998, 2003, and 2008 were statistically analyzed, and the results were shown in Figure 10. Combined with land use distribution, ArcGIS was used to analyze the simulated depth of infiltration, and the results are shown in Table 7.

Table 7

Influence of land-use change on infiltration (10−1 mm/km2)

Land-use changeChange of infiltration depth
forest-grass land −0.46 ∼ −0.36 
forest-cultivated land −0.67 ∼ −0.75 
forest-building land −2.18 ∼ −1.53 
grass land-forest 0.42 ∼ 0.60 
grass land-cultivated land −0.46 ∼ −0.36 
grass land-building land −1.52 ∼ −1.14 
cultivated land-water body −2.18 ∼ −1.53 
cultivated land-grass land 0.01 ∼ 0.41 
cultivated land-building land −1.13 ∼ −0.66 
Land-use changeChange of infiltration depth
forest-grass land −0.46 ∼ −0.36 
forest-cultivated land −0.67 ∼ −0.75 
forest-building land −2.18 ∼ −1.53 
grass land-forest 0.42 ∼ 0.60 
grass land-cultivated land −0.46 ∼ −0.36 
grass land-building land −1.52 ∼ −1.14 
cultivated land-water body −2.18 ∼ −1.53 
cultivated land-grass land 0.01 ∼ 0.41 
cultivated land-building land −1.13 ∼ −0.66 
Figure 10

Diagram of variation of infiltration depth.

Figure 10

Diagram of variation of infiltration depth.

Close modal

By comparing the change of infiltration depth caused by the mutual transformation of different land-use types, it can be found that the degree of land development and utilization in the process of urbanization will have a great influence on infiltration, among which the hardening of the underlying surface is the biggest influence. By comparing the changes in the infiltration depth under different land use transformation conditions, it is found that the impact of land-use change on the infiltration process during urbanization increases with the intensification of human exploitation and utilization of the underlying surface. The intensity of development and utilization of other land-use types of building land to building land is greater than that between them, and the change of infiltration process caused by the former is greater than that caused by the latter. When other land-use types are converted to building land, the infiltration depth decreases by 0.80 × 10−1 ∼ 2.18 × 10−1 mm/km2. When other land uses are converted to each other, the depth of infiltration varies from −0.95 × 10−1 ∼ 0.58 × 10−1 mm/km2.

Through afforestation, returning farmland to forest and grassland, the depth of infiltration can be restored to different degrees. In the process of afforestation, the infiltration depth increased by 0.36 × 10−1 ∼ 0.55 × 10−1 mm/km2 when the grassland was converted into forest land. In converting farmland to forest and grassland, the infiltration depth increased by 0.39 × 10−1 ∼ 0.58 × 10−1 mm/km2 when the farmland was converted to the forest and 0.35 × 10−1 ∼ 0.53 × 10−1 mm/km2 when the farmland was converted to grassland.

Evaporation change

Under the land use distribution in 1993, 1998, 2003, and 2008, a statistical analysis was carried out on the evaporation changes of 1978063023, 1998081404, and 2003082520 rainfall events (Figure 11). At the same time, combined with the land use distribution, ArcGIS was used to analyze and simulate the evaporation data (Table 8).

Table 8

Effect of land-use change on evaporation process (10−1 mm/km2)

Land-use changeChange in evaporation
forest-grass land −0.10 ∼ −0.06 
forest-cultivated land −0.13 ∼ −0.09 
forest-building land −0.64 ∼ −0.45 
grass land-forest 0.08 ∼ 0.12 
grass land-cultivated land −0.10 ∼ −0.06 
grass land-building land −0.44 ∼ −0.20 
cultivated land-water body −0.64 ∼ −0.45 
cultivated land-grass land 0.01 ∼ 0.08 
cultivated land-building land −0.21 ∼ −0.14 
Land-use changeChange in evaporation
forest-grass land −0.10 ∼ −0.06 
forest-cultivated land −0.13 ∼ −0.09 
forest-building land −0.64 ∼ −0.45 
grass land-forest 0.08 ∼ 0.12 
grass land-cultivated land −0.10 ∼ −0.06 
grass land-building land −0.44 ∼ −0.20 
cultivated land-water body −0.64 ∼ −0.45 
cultivated land-grass land 0.01 ∼ 0.08 
cultivated land-building land −0.21 ∼ −0.14 
Figure 11

Diagram of evaporation variation.

Figure 11

Diagram of evaporation variation.

Close modal

By comparing the data in the table above, it can be found that evaporation is closely related to the area of green plants. The greater the greening degree is, the greater the evaporation will be. On the contrary, when the grassland and woodland farmland is converted to construction land, the evaporation will decrease. When other land-use types convert to construction land, evaporation decreases by 0.14 × 10−1 ∼ 0.28 × 10−1 mm/km2. When other land-use types convert to each other, evaporation changes by −0.24 × 10−1 ∼ 0.14 × 10−1 mm/km2.

Evaporation area can be increased by increasing greening, such as the conversion of building land or farmland to forest land or conversion of grassland to grassland to forest land. In the process of afforestation, evaporation increases by 0.06 × 10−1 ∼ 0.10 × 10−1 mm/km2 when grassland is converted into forestland, and 0.09 × 10−1 ∼ 0.14 × 10−1 mm/km2 when farmland is converted into forestland. Evaporation increases by 0.08 × 10−1 ∼ 0.13 × 10−1 mm/km2 of cultivated land converted to grassland.

Influencing factors of runoff change

Through the statistical analysis of the contribution rate of different hydrological processes to the total runoff change under different land-use change models, it is found that urbanization mainly affects the hydrological process by influencing the infiltration process. During urban expansion, other land-use types were transformed to building land, and the contribution rate of the decrease of infiltration process to the increase of runoff process was over 80%. In the transformation from forestland to building land, the decrease of infiltration process contributes the most to the increase of runoff process, up to 90%. In the transformation from cultivated land to building land, the contribution rate of the decrease of infiltration process to the increase of runoff process is the highest and the lowest, reaching 82%. Ecological restoration measures, such as afforestation and conversion of farmland to forest, mainly reduce runoff by improving infiltration soil structure. In the transition from forest land to grassland, from cultivated land to forest land, and from cultivated land to grassland, the increase of infiltration contributed over 80% to the decrease of the runoff process.

By longitudinal comparison of data results in Tables 68 (as shown in Figure 12), it can be found that for the same type of land use transformation, the change in runoff depth, infiltration depth, and evaporation is consistent. This shows that the three hydrological factors are not only affected by the land-use change but also their correlation with each other cannot be ignored. At the same time, it can be found that the contribution in the infiltration is more than evaporation in the runoff process. When a variety of land-use types are converted to building land, the runoff depth increases, and the runoff velocity speeds up because of the decrease in roughness. The decrease of infiltration is not only because of the hardening of the underlying surface but also has a certain relationship with the change of runoff velocity. The decrease of infiltration depth will also reduce evaporation to a certain extent.

Figure 12

The contribution rate of runoff process change to total runoff change under different land-use change patterns.

Figure 12

The contribution rate of runoff process change to total runoff change under different land-use change patterns.

Close modal

With the acceleration of urbanization, land-use change is mainly manifested as the increase of underlying surface hardening area and the decrease of green area, there is the increase of building land. It is this change that leads to the increase of runoff depth and the decrease of infiltration and evaporation. Through afforestation, the increasing green area can reduce the probability of urban floods to a certain extent. It also provides ideas and reference points for the study of runoff in sponge city construction and future urbanization.

In this study, a soil-land use index GSSHA model was established, and parameter calibration and model validation were carried out by using the measured rainfall-runoff data in Zhengzhou. The innovation of this paper lies in the establishment of GSSHA based on soil land use index grid, which simulates the impact of urbanization on hydrological processes and quantitatively analyzes the impacts and contributions of different land-use transformations on urban hydrological processes. The main findings are as follows:

  • (1)

    Land-use change and human use of the urban underlying surface jointly affect hydrological processes. When grassland and forest land are converted into construction land, the changes of runoff infiltration and evaporation are larger than those of grassland, forest and cultivated land.

  • (2)

    Afforestation, returning farmland to grassland, and other vegetation restoration measures can reduce the hydrological process changes caused by land-use changes in urbanization to varying degrees.

  • (3)

    Land use change affects urban expansion mainly through influencing the infiltration process and hydrological process. Other land-use types change to building land, and the contribution rate of decrease of infiltration process to increase of runoff process is over 80%. In the transition from forest land to grassland, from cultivated land to forest land, and from cultivated land to grassland, the increase of infiltration contributed over 80% to the decrease of the runoff process.

For this research paper with several authors, a brief paragraph specifying their individual contributions was provided. Caihong Hu and Fan Yang developed the original idea and contributed to the research design for the study. Sun Yue handled data collecting. Chenchen Zhao and Jingyi Wang provided guidance and contributed to the research design. Chengshuai Liu and Shan-e-hyder Soomro provided some guidance for the writing of the article. All authors have read and approved the final manuscript.

This work was funded by Key projects of National Natural Science Foundation of China, grant number 51739009, National Natural Science Foundation of China, grant number 51979250.

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest regarding the publication of this paper.

Data cannot be made publicly available; readers should contact the corresponding author for details.

Brendel
C. E.
,
Dymond
R. L.
&
Aguilar
M. F.
2021
Modeling storm sewer networks and urban flooding in Roanoke, Virginia, with SWMM and GSSHA
.
Journal of Hydrologic Engineering
26
(
1
),
05020044
.
Brun
S. E.
&
Band
L. E.
2000
Simulating runoff behavior in an urbanizing watershed
.
Computes, Environment and Urban Systems
24
,
5
22
.
Chen
Y.
,
Dai
J.
&
Li
J.
2008
CART decision tree classification method based on multiple features of image and its application
.
Geography and Geo-Information Science
02
,
33
36
.
De Moraes
T. C.
,
dos Santos
V. J.
,
Calijuri
M. L.
&
Pereira Torres
F. T.
2018
Effects on runoff caused by changes in land cover in a Brazilian southeast basin: evaluation by HEC-HMS and HEC-GEOHMS
.
Environmental Earth Sciences
77
(
6
),
250
.
Du
X.
2020
Research on the Refined Simulation of Urban Rainstorm and Flood Based on SWMM Model
.
Zhengzhou University
.
Gao
Y.
,
Yuan
Y.
,
Wang
H.
,
Zhang
Z.
&
Ye
L.
2018
Analysis of impacts of polders on flood processes in Qinhuai River Basin, China, using the HEC-RAS model
.
Water Science and Technology-Water Supply
18
,
1852
1860
.
Gupta
H. V.
,
Sorooshian
S.
&
Yapo
P. O.
1999
Status of automatic calibration for hydrologic models: comparison with multilevel expert calibration
.
Journal of Hydrologic Engineering
4
(
2
),
135
.
Hu
C. H.
,
Liu
C. S.
,
Yao
Y. C.
,
Wu
Q.
,
Ma
B. Y.
&
Jian
S. Q.
2020
Evaluation of the impact of rainfall inputs on urban rainfall models: a systematic review
.
Water
12
(
9
),
2484
.
Jackson
E. K.
,
Roberts
W.
,
Nelsen
B.
,
Williams
G. P.
,
Nelson
E. J.
&
Ames
D. P.
2019
Introductory overview: error metrics for hydrologic modelling – A review of common practices and an open source library to facilitate use and adoption
.
Environmental Modelling & Software
119
,
32
48
.
Jauregui
E.
1995
Rainfall fluctuations and tropical storm activity in Mexico (Niederschlagsschwankungen und Aktivität tropischer Stürme in Mexiko)
.
Erdkunde
49
(
1
),
332
338
.
Li
Z.
,
Qu
C.
,
Huang
P.
&
Yao
C.
2017
Runoff simulation of CASC2D model and GSSHA model in Luanchuan watershed
.
Journal of Hohai University (Natural Science Edition)
45
,
1
6
.
Liu
J.
,
Wang
H.
,
Gao
X.
,
Chen
S.
,
Wang
J.
&
Shao
W.
2014
Urban hydrology research review
.
Chinese Science Bulletin
59
,
3581
3590
.
Martins
R.
,
Leandro
J.
&
Djordjevic
S.
2018
Influence of sewer network models on urban flood damage assessment based on coupled 1D/2D models
.
Journal of Flood Risk Management
11
,
S717
S728
.
Mei
C.
2019
Urban hydrology and hydrodynamic coupling model and its application research
.
China Institute of Water Resources and Hydropower Research
.
Moriasi
D. N.
,
Arnold
J. G.
,
Van Liew
M. W.
,
Bingner
R. L.
,
Harmel
R. D.
&
Veith
T. L.
2007
Model evaluation guidelines for systematic quantification of accuracy in watershed simulations
.
Transactions of the Asabe
50
,
885
900
.
Nash
J. E.
&
Sutcliffe
J. V.
1970
River flow forecasting through conceptual models part I– A discussion of principles
.
10
.
Elsevier
.
Ren
C.
,
Wu
D.
&
Dong
S.
2006
The influence of urbanization in Northwestern China on the urban climate environment
.
Geographical Research
25
(
2
),
233
241
.
Sarauskiene
D.
,
Akstinas
V.
,
Nazarenko
S.
,
Kriauciuniene
J.
&
Jurgelenaite
A.
2020
Impact of physico-geographical factors and climate variability on flow intermittency in the rivers of water surplus zone
.
Hydrological Processes
34
,
4727
4739
.
Shi
P.
,
Yuan
Y.
&
Chen
J.
2001
The impact of land use change in Shenzhen on watershed runoff
.
Acta Ecologica Sinica
21
(
7
),
1041
1049
.
Wang
Z.
&
Cheng
W.
2002
Analysis and thinking on the ecological mechanism of urban waterlogging disasters——taking Hangzhou City as the main research object
.
Journal of Zhejiang University (Engineering Science Edition)
36
(
5
),
583
589
.
Wang
J. Y.
,
Hu
C. H.
,
Ma
B. Y.
&
Mu
X. L.
2020
Rapid urbanization impact on the hydrological processes in Zhengzhou, China
.
Water
12
(
7
),
1870
.
Xu
Y.
,
Hu
C.
,
Wu
Q.
,
Li
Z.
,
Jian
S.
&
Chen
Y.
2021
Application of temporal convolutional network for flood forecasting
.
Hydrology Research
52
(
6
),
1455
1468
.
Yang
Y.
,
Zhu
Z.
,
Cai
Y.
&
Yang
Z.
2021
The response of urban watershed peak runoff to the temporal and spatial heterogeneity of rainfall
.
Water Resources Protection
37
(
6
),
27
33
.
Zhang
G.
2013
Research on Stormwater Management Model Based on Optimization of Land use Pattern
.
Zhejiang University
.
Zhao
Y.
,
Xia
J.
,
Xu
Z.
,
Zou
L.
,
Tan
Q.
&
Chen
H.
2021
Shenzhen rain island effect analysis
.
Journal of Beijing Normal University (Natural Science Edition)
1
8
.
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Licence (CC BY 4.0), which permits copying, adaptation and redistribution, provided the original work is properly cited (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).