Disposal of rejected brine is a fundamental part of reverse osmosis desalination technology, it presents negative influences on the marine ecosystem due to the high salt content and the presence of other harmful chemicals in the concentrate. Solar distillation is a promising technology for brine management. The main goal of this study was to treat high salinity solution of reverse osmosis desalination brine and to recover valuable resources while producing freshwater. The implementation of the study is through two phases: the first phase includes desalination by a reverse osmosis process to produce fresh water and the concentrated brine, while the second phase consists of recovering solid salts using the solar distillation. Thus, different experiments of desalination by reverse osmosis pilot and solar distillation were carried out under optimal experimental conditions. The obtained results showed that chlorides are the most dominant constituents in the composition of brines, while the daily water productivity contributed to around 80% of the total productivity of the solar system (volume of the water produced/m2/day) and the amount of salt crystallized by solar distillation represents 35 grams per liter of brine, this salt is greatly demanded in several sectors such as agriculture, industry, and others.

  • Produce concentrated brine by the reverse osmosis desalination process.

  • Provide and test the technical feasibility of recovering reject brine using solar distillation.

  • Achieve zero liquid discharge and reduce the environmentally negative effects of brine on the ecosystem.

  • Define the influence of the optimum operating parameters.

  • Recover salt crystals of NaCl.

Graphical Abstract

Graphical Abstract

Disposal of rejected brine is a fundamental part of reverse osmosis (RO) desalination technology, it presents negative influences on the marine ecosystem due to the high salt composition and the presence of other harmful chemicals in the concentrate (Heck et al. 2018; Cipolletta et al. 2021). Given the necessity of zero liquid discharge (ZLD) and the increasing amounts of brine rejected, there is a requirement to find alternative technologies for brine management that maximizes water recovery and minimizes the volume of concentrated brine (Chen et al. 2021).

Due to water scarcity and its growing demand, the number of desalination plants in Algeria was increased significantly in the last two decades. The country has developed an ambitious program of seawater desalination through the installation of large stations with a total capacity of 2 million m³ per day (MRE 2020). The Algerian desalination units use RO with 95% and multi-stage flash (MSF) with 5% of the total capacity installed. The optimum recovery ratio for RO plants in the country is estimated at around 45%, while the rest is discharged as brine at about 85 g/L (Mozas et Ghosn 2013). The desalinated water production in the world is around 95.37 million m3/day, while the rejected brine is 141.5 million m3/day (Jones et al. 2019). Currently, this brine causes substantial environmental problems because it has to be disposed of, which usually means it gets dumped back into the sea resulting in a region of hypersaline water that causes damage to fish and sea vegetation (Pérez-González et al. 2012; Morillo et al. 2014; Tong & Elimelech 2016; Heck et al. 2018). The problem is even worse in applications far from the marine environment where the brine may be disposed of in deep wells or other sites, and again is a cause of environmental stress (Belhout et al. 2018).

Several management approaches such as membrane-based, thermal-based, and emerging technologies point out the possibility to treat brine rejected from conventional electric-driven RO desalination plants (Liu et al. 2016; Giwa et al. 2017; Jones et al. 2019). Ahmed et al. (2003) presented an integrated technology (SAL-PROC) for salts extraction from brine by multiple evaporations and/or cooling techniques using mineral and chemical processing, the yearly profit was estimated at $895,000 by recovering 405,000 m3/y of reject brine. In another study (Almasri et al. 2015), brackish water RO brine was treated using a two-stage nano-filtration process. The hypersolution of RO brine can be concentrated by greater than four times using direct contact membrane distillation as highlighted by Bouchrit et al. (2015), while distillation via evaporation and condensation processes separates pure water from a hypersaline solution of brackish or seawater (Kim 2011). Nonetheless, the selection of a suitable brine recovery process is based on several factors, such as feed solution composition, target recovered minerals, land use, meteorological conditions, and others (Giwa et al. 2017).

Solar energy is one of the renewable energy sources required for water desalination that can play a strategic role in the energy transition due to its low carbon footprint. The advantages of this clean energy are its simplicity, low manufacturing cost, including being a sustainable source, and economic. It replaces the negative effects of fossil fuels with more environmentally friendly alternatives.

It is important to provide safe water to communities via reliable technologies using sustainable and renewable energies to save fossil fuels. In fact, desalination systems can provide potable water using solar energy. Indeed, there are different solar desalination techniques used to purify saltwater through thermal and membrane processes. Among the thermal processes, solar distillation is an economically viable technique for treating seawater and brackish water due to its simplicity and low manufacturing cost. The solar still is a system that applies direct or indirect solar energy for freshwater production. It could be designed and built-in in different sizes depending on the capacities needed. Its mechanism is very simple and based on a thermal process (Liquid–vapor phase-change processes) in which the brine heats up in an insulated pan and then evaporates and condenses on a cold wall. However, compared with the membrane desalination processes, the efficiency and yield of solar stills are always low. Recently, researchers have tried to improve the performance of different solar stills. The main parameters affecting solar still productivity are climatic conditions, design, and operational conditions. Several experimental and numerical works on solar stills have been reported in previous studies (Sheeba et al. 2015; Tigrine et al. 2015; Diaf et al. 2016; Kumar et al. 2016; Samuel & Kalidasa Murugavel 2017). Tigrine et al. (2021) realized a new solar still with energy storage coupled with two solar collectors that are used for desalination of groundwater in the Bou-Ismail region. It was found that the average daily distillate output of a concrete solar still with energy storage is more significant than that of a solar still without energy storage. They showed that the use of energy storage increases productivity by 50% in the nocturnal period. In recent years, many researchers have investigated the effects of using various types of nano-fluid on the performance of water purification solar still (Sahota & Tiwari 2016; Mutlq et al. 2019; Parsa et al. 2020; Singh et al. 2020). Ajdari & Ameri (2022) evaluated the performance of an inclined stepped solar still integrated with phase-change materials PCM and a CuO/GO nanocomposite as a nanofluid. They analyzed the effects of various factors like nanocomposite concentration in the base fluid, the volume ratio of CuO and GO nanoparticles in the hybrid nanocomposite, and the flow rate of brine into the solar still. Their results showed that 0.03 wt% CuO and GO boosted the freshwater yield by 48.12 and 81.59%, respectively. Additionally, it has been found that decreasing the brine flow rate from 30 to 8 L h−1 increased freshwater production, and when conversely increasing to 68 L h−1 caused the reduction of the distillate yield.

Given the necessity of ZLD and the increasing amounts of brine rejected, there is a need to find alternative technology for brine management that maximizes water recovery and minimizes the volume of concentrated brine. Solar distillation may be a solution to realize ‘zero discharge’ desalination in which only dry minerals remain after the evaporation process, which can then be used for their mineral value in different industrial applications rather than having to be disposed of as a (nearly) hazardous waste (Ahmed et al. 2001; Saleh et al. 2011; Tong & Elimelech 2016). This technology is significant because it requires relatively modest operational conditions, such as low-temperature heat that can be generated by the greenhouse phenomenon and an inexpensive solar thermal collector (Mickley 2008; Ossandón et al. 2010).

The purpose of the present study is to reuse seawater RO brine to produce freshwater, and solid salts, and minimize the environmental impact of the seawater RO process using an alternative approach of solar distillation. The novelty in the work is that we used a new design of a solar still coupled with solar collectors and an energy storage system carried out by the desalination team of the UDES for water treatment and desalination where all contaminants are removed. The paper is organized into four sections leaving the Introduction as section 1. The methodology of the work adopted by the study is discussed in section 2 under Materials and Methods. This section presents pilots' study of RO desalination and solar distiller. Production and valorization of the brine by solar distillation by providing an evaporation system to recover the resulting hypersaline solution to remove all salt crystals was carried out by the study. The results of the investigation of the chemical composition of produced water and brine and the distillation process have been displayed and discussed in the third section under Results and Discussion. The final conclusion is mentioned in the fourth section of the paper under the heading Conclusion.

The work proposes one of the sustainable technologies in which solar energy is used for brine disposal from the RO desalination technique in Algeria (reject brine) as well as to explore solar evaporation as an alternative method for the removal of a high salt content as a low-cost strategy. Indeed, brine rejection from desalination manufactories can have useful applications in industry and agriculture.

Our particular unconventional approach is to combine two solar desalination technologies namely reverse osmosis driven photovoltaic (ROPV) systems and solar stills as the best way or option of brine disposal methods to minimize desalination waste in order to produce more freshwater volume and less concentration while respecting the environment.

In this chapter, we present a description of the pilot plant for seawater desalination by RO as well as the solar distillation system which was used in the present study. This experimental work was carried out in the laboratory for distillation and desalination of brackish and seawater (DDEMS) at the Development Unit of Solar Equipments (UDES/CDER) in Bou-Ismail, Wilaya of Tipaza (Figure 1).
Figure 1

Methodology of work.

Figure 1

Methodology of work.

Close modal

A study of the composition of the Algerian Mediterranean coastal water at the Bou-Ismail region was carried out. Thus, this paper describes an investigation of seawater and the rejected RO brine by analyzing its physicochemical and microbial composition as well as the recovery process using solar distillation aimed at treating the hypersaline concentrate and reducing its environmental impact.

Operation mode of reverse osmosis filtration

Actually, the RO desalination technique is the most common desalination process for seawater and brackish water, due to its low energy consumption. Reverse osmosis combined with solar energy is one of the most economical alternative solutions as a climate change adaptation option (an adaptation option to climate change), compared to thermal desalination methods that consume more energy and increase air pollution (Do Thi et al. 2021; Shalaby et al. 2022). However, the desalination process for removing salt and other minerals from seawater is frequently requested to solve water supply problems.

In the RO system, seawater is pressurized and passed via a specific membrane module that allows the permeation of water while eliminating all existent solutes (Tigrine et al. 2021). In general, RO desalination consists of four main parts, namely pretreatment, a high-pressure pump, membrane modules, and post-treatment (Tigrine et al. 2016). In fact, the water which passes through this membrane is called permeate and that which remains behind it with the dissolved and suspended solids is known as the brine (retentate).

The experimental RO pilot located at the Development of Solar equipment UDES was generated from a photovoltaic solar field. It was carried out in semi-automatic mode. The study was conducted on seawater from the Bou-Ismail region characterized by electrical conductivity of 56 ms/cm and a salinity of 38 g/l. The solar desalination equipment is made of two constituents, the RO system, and the PV solar energy modules as shown in Figure 2.
Figure 2

Presentation of the reverse osmosis pilot (a) and the membrane desalination process (b).

Figure 2

Presentation of the reverse osmosis pilot (a) and the membrane desalination process (b).

Close modal

This solar desalination (RO) pilot developed at UDES was carried out to research improvements in technology and also to carry out a feasibility study in the local Algerian regions. This solar desalination system can use seawater or brackish water as a water supply depending on the characteristics of the membrane.

Solar distillation system

Brine generated by the RO desalination pilot was recovered using a solar distillation system designed and developed at UDES.

The greenhouse solar system consists of two units as shown in Figure 3. The distillation unit is a transparent Plexiglas spherical still with a cylindrical tank, surmounted by sidewalls of optimized height and with a semi-spherical condensing surface. The second unit is a solar thermal collector which represents the heat source for water evaporation.
Figure 3

Presentation of solar system coupled with a solar thermal collector.

Figure 3

Presentation of solar system coupled with a solar thermal collector.

Close modal

The solar system contains an evaporation pond filled with brine, it represents a volumetric holding capacity of 3 liters and an evaporator surface of around 0.19 m2. The evaporator system is coupled directly with a solar heat collector as a heat source of saltwater by the natural phenomenon of the thermosiphon, providing the circulation of water which is selected as the calorific fluid according to its physicochemical properties.

The different temperatures of the distiller were measured using type K thermocouples (Chromel-Alumel). Meteorological parameters such as global irradiation and ambient temperature were measured by a meteorological station installed at UDES. The day July 21st, 2019 was chosen as the experimental day.

The RO unit (Figure 2) was investigated and used for water production. This brine was used as the input of the solar distillation evaporator (Figure 3). Water samples were collected from concentrate water (brine), permeate water and other samples were also collected from the solar still in an evaporation pan and salt in a solid state. All collected samples were analyzed by physicochemical, microbial, and scanning electron microscope techniques.

In this part of the study, the results and discussion of the experimental study on the desalination of seawater by RO, as well as the recovery of brines generated by a solar distillation system are presented.

The first step is the investigation of the chemical and bacteriological composition in order to estimate the quality of the water (seawater to be desalinated, desalinated water, and brine discharges).

In the second step, and with the aim of purifying the brines generated, we present the experimental results obtained during solar distillation, by studying the influence of meteorological parameters and the different temperatures of the solar system distiller, in order to master the technology and recover salt crystals.

Level of some major constituents of the seawater and reverse osmosis brine at Bou-Ismail region (Algeria)

Available seawater and reject brine quality in Bou-Ismail region in comparison with other desalination plants from different regions around the world are given in Tables 1 and 2, respectively.

Table 1

Chemical composition of seawater at Bou-Ismail region in comparison with some Mediterranean regions

ParametersUnitBou-Ismail, Algeria (Present study)Cap Djenet, Algeria (Amitouche & Remini 2014)Calabria, Italy (Ji et al. 2010)Alexandria, Egypt (Nessim et al. 2015)
pH  8.15 8.47 8.2  
Temperature °C 17.5 27.46 25  
Conductivity μS/cm 57,623 85,030   
Total dissolved solids (TDS) g/L 37.9 –   
Salinity mg/L 74,471 69,553.52   
Turbidity NTU 0.45 –   
Total hardness (TH) °F 768.4 1,226.66   
Alkalinity (TA) °F 00   
Total alkalinity (TA) °F 16.6 19.87   
Nitrites NO2 <0.013 00   
Nitrates NO3 <0.25 00   
Bicarbonates mg/L 149,4 –   
Calcium (Ca2+mg/L 359.4 – 440 403.0 
Magnesium (Mg2+mg/L 719 – 1,420 1,506.6 
Chlorides (Clmg/L 6,380 34,666.6 20,250  
Potassium (K+mg/L 466 860.67  381.2 
Iron (Fe3+mg/L <0.2 0.045   
Sulfates (SO4−2mg/L 3,458 5,155 2,150 3,068 
ParametersUnitBou-Ismail, Algeria (Present study)Cap Djenet, Algeria (Amitouche & Remini 2014)Calabria, Italy (Ji et al. 2010)Alexandria, Egypt (Nessim et al. 2015)
pH  8.15 8.47 8.2  
Temperature °C 17.5 27.46 25  
Conductivity μS/cm 57,623 85,030   
Total dissolved solids (TDS) g/L 37.9 –   
Salinity mg/L 74,471 69,553.52   
Turbidity NTU 0.45 –   
Total hardness (TH) °F 768.4 1,226.66   
Alkalinity (TA) °F 00   
Total alkalinity (TA) °F 16.6 19.87   
Nitrites NO2 <0.013 00   
Nitrates NO3 <0.25 00   
Bicarbonates mg/L 149,4 –   
Calcium (Ca2+mg/L 359.4 – 440 403.0 
Magnesium (Mg2+mg/L 719 – 1,420 1,506.6 
Chlorides (Clmg/L 6,380 34,666.6 20,250  
Potassium (K+mg/L 466 860.67  381.2 
Iron (Fe3+mg/L <0.2 0.045   
Sulfates (SO4−2mg/L 3,458 5,155 2,150 3,068 
Table 2

Chemical composition of the reject brine from desalination system at Bou-Ismail region in comparison with desalination plants from some Mediterranean regions

ParametersUnitBou-Ismail, Algeria (Present study)Cap Djenet, Algeria (Amitouche & Remini 2014)Dhekelia, Cyprus (Macedonio et al. 2011)Skhira, Tunisia (Hajbi et al. 2010)Calabria, Italy (Ji et al. 2010)
pH  7.51 8.47 7.2 8.2 
Temperature °C 18.9 27.46   25 
Conductivity μS/cm 86.221 85.03 13,500 33,000  
TDS g/L 59.47   28.000 50.200 
Turbidity NTU 0.65     
TH °F 1,380 1,226.66    
TA °F 00    
TAC °F 13.3 19.87    
Nitrites NO2 <0.02 00    
Nitrates NO3 12 00    
Bicarbonates (HCO3mg/L 138    199 
Calcium (Ca2+mg/L 380  540 2,080 625 
Magnesium (Mg2+mg/L 840  245 770 2,020 
Chlorides (Clmg/L 21,433 34,666.66 4,068 14,170 28,800 
Potassium (K+mg/L 700 860.67 79   
Iron (Fe3+mg/L 0.065 0.045    
Sulfate (SO4−2mg/L 5,430 5,155 2,160 5,920 3,060 
ParametersUnitBou-Ismail, Algeria (Present study)Cap Djenet, Algeria (Amitouche & Remini 2014)Dhekelia, Cyprus (Macedonio et al. 2011)Skhira, Tunisia (Hajbi et al. 2010)Calabria, Italy (Ji et al. 2010)
pH  7.51 8.47 7.2 8.2 
Temperature °C 18.9 27.46   25 
Conductivity μS/cm 86.221 85.03 13,500 33,000  
TDS g/L 59.47   28.000 50.200 
Turbidity NTU 0.65     
TH °F 1,380 1,226.66    
TA °F 00    
TAC °F 13.3 19.87    
Nitrites NO2 <0.02 00    
Nitrates NO3 12 00    
Bicarbonates (HCO3mg/L 138    199 
Calcium (Ca2+mg/L 380  540 2,080 625 
Magnesium (Mg2+mg/L 840  245 770 2,020 
Chlorides (Clmg/L 21,433 34,666.66 4,068 14,170 28,800 
Potassium (K+mg/L 700 860.67 79   
Iron (Fe3+mg/L 0.065 0.045    
Sulfate (SO4−2mg/L 5,430 5,155 2,160 5,920 3,060 

As shown in Table 1, seawater of the Bou-Ismail region has a quite different composition than that of Cap Djenet (Algeria), they belong to the same coastal region with a separation distance of around 120 km, but the salt content, such as calcium (Ca2+), magnesium (Mg2+), chlorides (Cl) and potassium (K+), is somewhat lower than that of other regions from Mediterranean areas such as Italy and Egypt.

The average chemical characteristics of reject brine of the study RO system presented in Table 2, are generally in the same order of similarity as the results of the Cap Djenet (Algeria) desalination plant. For the other treatment stations of other countries like Cyprus, Tunisia, and Italy, the comparison is more or less dissimilar due probably to the difference in seawater composition or to the membrane characteristics used for the desalination process.

Generally, for each parameter, there is a significant decrease in its initial recorded value for seawater compared to reject brine for the samples of the Bou-Ismail region, this explains that the RO desalination system has given very good results in removing salts from seawater. Conversely, reject brine has the highest values, this confirms the effectiveness of the RO membrane in removing salts and various undesirable materials found in seawater.

Bacteriological quality assessment associated with the marine environment (seawater and brine) is a very important parameter to analyze (Mok et al. 2016; Frank et al. 2017; Karbasdehi et al. 2017; Arfaeinia et al. 2019) because the use of RO membranes when the risk of biological eutrophication is present, chances pathogenic behavior in which microorganisms can be ingested, having a negative impact on the marine environment life.

The enumeration of pathogenic bacteria in seawater, and brine is presented in Table 3, seawater contains some microorganisms that remain within the required standards (Karbasdehi et al. 2017), however, the results show a complete absence of microbial organisms for brine, due to the high salinity of brine which is an unfavorable condition for the development of pathogens in the marine environment.

Table 3

Bacteriological composition of seawater and the reject brine at Bou-Ismail region in comparison with a standard

Parameters (CFU/100 ml)Bou-Ismail, Algeria (Present study)
SeawaterBrine
Total coliforms 14.19 00 
Fecal coliforms 00 00 
Total streptococci 4.2 00 
Fecal streptococci 00 00 
Clostridium 00 00 
Parameters (CFU/100 ml)Bou-Ismail, Algeria (Present study)
SeawaterBrine
Total coliforms 14.19 00 
Fecal coliforms 00 00 
Total streptococci 4.2 00 
Fecal streptococci 00 00 
Clostridium 00 00 

Salts are chemical compounds that contain anions such as NO2, NO3, HCO3, Cl, SO42− and cations such as Ca2+, Mg2+, K+, and Fe3+. Total dissolved solids (TDS) data give a value of 37.9 g/l for seawater and 59.47 g/l for reject brine, which explains that rejects brine is 1.5 times more concentrated than the seawater.

The comparison of major salt concentration between the reject brine and seawater in Bou-Ismail coastal is illustrated in Figure 4.
Figure 4

Salts composition in seawater and brine of Bou-Ismail coastal.

Figure 4

Salts composition in seawater and brine of Bou-Ismail coastal.

Close modal

As shown by Figure 4, chlorides are the most dominant constituents in the composition of brine, they present significantly higher values in RO brine from the desalination system with an average of 21,433 mg/L than in seawater with an average of 638 mg/L.

Regarding sulfates, their concentration levels in brine contents are 1.5 times higher than the seawater, with an average value of 5,430 mg/L and 3,458 mg/L for brine and seawater, respectively.

Contrary to the two previous salts (chlorides and sulfates), potassium and magnesium exhibited lower levels in reject brine, their averages ranged from 700 mg/L to 840 mg, similar results were found by Amitouche & Remini (2014) and Macedonio et al. (2011), but it still somewhat higher levels than those of seawater. Conversely, calcium level shows relatively low averages in brine and seawater being 380 mg/L and 359 mg/L, on average, respectively, compared to other salts.

Salt recovery by solar distillation

The production rate of water distilled by solar was still affected by operational and meteorological parameters. Figure 5 illustrates the variation in solar radiation and ambient temperature as a function of time.
Figure 5

Solar radiation and ambient temperature variation as a function of time.

Figure 5

Solar radiation and ambient temperature variation as a function of time.

Close modal

According to Figure 5, the ambient temperature ranges between 24.5 and 33.9 °C, it increases as the solar radiation increases, which reaches its maximum of 850 w/m² between 12:00 h and 14:00 h PM for the study day (July 21st, 2019). The solar system reflects 11% of solar radiation considered the most influencing parameter of the functioning of the system as mentioned by several studies (Diaf et al. 2016; Mohsenzadeh et al. 2021; Tigrine et al. 2021). During the off-shine hours from 00:00 AM to 7:00 AM and from 21:00 PM to 00:00 AM, the solar irradiation, as well as the ambient temperature, is zero.

The temperature variation of water and air and the hourly production as a function of time during the study day are illustrated in Figure 6.
Figure 6

Temporal temperature variation of different elements of the solar still with the hourly production.

Figure 6

Temporal temperature variation of different elements of the solar still with the hourly production.

Close modal

Temperatures of the water and the air inside the distiller increase over time and reach a maximum value of 70 °C and 75.6 °C for the air inside and the water, respectively.

During the sunshine time from 9 AM to 4 PM, the solar radiation that passes through the solar still's glass cover and is captured by the thermal sensor, increases gradually for higher operating temperature (air and water) and higher productivity, until reaches the maximum at 2 PM, this temperature has a direct effect on the temperature of the saline water (brine), it leads to increased water productivity rate to form salt crystals by improving the evaporation process.

Indeed, we indicate that when the radiation varies, the quantity of distilled water varies. For example, if the solar radiation decreases, the productivity (performance) of the solar still decreases. There is no relation between solar radiation and the disposal of salts,

Radiation heat transfer is the process by which thermal energy is exchanged between two surfaces. Radiation is responsible for most of the heat transferred into the system by conduction and convection that increases thermal energy and its intensity increases dramatically with temperature.

The solar energy received by the surface of the water provides the energy necessary for the evaporation of the water, while the salts and other minerals and impurities remain at the bottom; this water vapor then rises to condense on the inner surface of the tilted transparent cover of the still where it is collected.

Generally, the performance of solar still is evaluated by the quantity of water produced by the basin area in a day as illustrated by Figure 7.
Figure 7

Daily and nocturnal and total production of solar still.

Figure 7

Daily and nocturnal and total production of solar still.

Close modal

The results of the daily and nocturnal production of the distilled water show that the solar system has the highest water productivity during the daytime when compared to night-time, because the daytime productivity increases considerably with the increase of temperature, whereas a significant increase in productivity is caused by the heat storage during overnight. Generally, the daily productivity contributed to around 80% of the total productivity of the solar system.

Salts crystallize by evaporation of brine quantity (3 liters) until reaching the saturation thresholds. In solution chemistry, saturation is the concentration at which a substance can no longer dissolve in a solvent (water in this case), the amount of salt recovered by the solar distillation system is 105 grams of salt per 3 liters of brine (this is the equivalent of 35 grams per liter). In countries with sufficient sunshine and temperature, such as Algeria, salt of rejected RO brine can be extracted by evaporation using a salt evaporation pond, and valuable salts could be obtained from brine for which there is great demand for several sectors such as agriculture, industry, environmental and others (Belhout et al. 2018).

Salt analysis by scanning electron microscope

A scanning electron microscope (SEM) was used to evaluate the composition and the morphology of salt crystals obtained by solar distillation as shown by Figures 8 and 9, respectively.
Figure 8

Mass percentage of salt cristals obtained by SEM.

Figure 8

Mass percentage of salt cristals obtained by SEM.

Close modal
Figure 9

SEM images of salt crystals (dimensions: 10 μm, 20 μm, 50 μm, 200 μm, 500 μm, and 1 mm).

Figure 9

SEM images of salt crystals (dimensions: 10 μm, 20 μm, 50 μm, 200 μm, 500 μm, and 1 mm).

Close modal

The mass percentage results in Figure 8 indicate the SEM analysis of solid crystals that were formed during the solar distillation experiment. The Cl and Na ions were the most dominant constituents in the mass composition of salt crystals with values of 36,87% and 17,13% respectively. These results of Cl value are in the same accordance with the results found in Table 1 and Figure 3 about RO brine composition.

Based on the results of Figure 9, the SEM images of salt crystals reveal the formation of NaCl crystals with different sizes ranging from 50 μm to 1 mm. The SEM method was used to evaluate the composition and the morphology of salt crystals and to confirm the obtained chemical content analysis, in order estimate the quality of brine and its final utilization.

The superiority of this method given as an effective solution for freshwater production is very cheap process, economical, simple, and a low maintenance process compared to other available methods such as membrane distillation (MD), membrane crystallization (Mcr), and forward osmosis (FO) that are water separation processes using a semi-permeable membrane to separate water from dissolved solutes. They are generated by electrical or thermal energy and consume the chemical products used in membrane cleaning and extensive pretreatment. Conventional brine treatment systems like natural evaporation ponds have a significant impact on soil and groundwater due to the disposal of brine discharge from desalination plants. However, low productivity and large land areas are the major limitations of the solar distillation compared to the thermal methods. (Diaf et al. 2016).

For that, in our unit center, the main focus of our research was on increasing the capacity of production by enhancing the thermal efficiency of the system.

Based on the results of this study, the following conclusions were obtained:

  • The reject brine is very concentrated with the different constituents (TDS = 59.45 g/L) compared to seawater (TDS = 37.9 g/L) because of the effectiveness of the RO membrane in removing salts from the seawater.

  • Salt crystal separation from brine can be accomplished by distillation, in which water is vaporized from the salt solution and subsequently recovered by condensation in the solar still.

  • The performance of solar distillation is directly affected by operational and meteorological parameters such as the solar radiation that considered the most influencing parameter of the functioning of the solar system, by affecting the rate of evaporation and condensation processes.

  • The SEM analysis revealed the formation of NaCl crystals recovered by solar distillation.

Management of the generated brine will likely become a serious challenge in the future, brine reject is usually drained back into the sea generating an environmental impact at the reception point. In this context, the application of solar distillation for brine management, can recover water and salts, and reduce its impact on the receiving environment and marine pollution compared with the traditional technologies that have been used to treat brine as a waste disposal problem.

All relevant data are included in the paper or its Supplementary Information.

The authors declare there is no conflict.

Ahmed
M.
,
Shayya
W. H.
,
Hoey
D.
&
Al-Handaly
J.
2001
Brine disposal from reverse osmosis desalination plants in Oman and the United Arab Emirates
.
Desalination
133
,
135
147
.
Ahmed
M. A.
,
Arakel
A.
,
Hoey
D.
,
Thumarukudy
M. R.
,
Goosen
M. F. A.
,
Al-Haddabi
M.
&
Al-Belushi
A.
2003
Feasibility of salt production from inland RO desalination plant reject brine: a case study
.
Desalination
158
,
109
117
.
Ajdari
H.
&
Ameri
A.
2022
Performance assessment of an inclined stepped solar still integrated with PCM and CuO/GO nanocomposite as a nanofluid
.
Journal of Building Engineering
49
,
104090
.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2022.104090
.
Arfaeinia
H.
,
Fazlzadeh
M.
,
Taghizadeh
F.
,
Saeedi
R.
,
Spitz
J.
&
Dobaradaran
S.
2019
Phthalate acid esters (PAEs) accumulation in coastal sediments from regions with different land use configuration along the Persian Gulf
.
Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety
169
,
496
506
.
Belhout
D.
,
Belgroun
Z.
,
Abbas
M.
,
Tigrine
Z.
&
Tassalit
D.
2018
Approaches and processes for recovering reverse osmosis discharges from desalination plants
. In:
6Th International Renewable and Sustainable Energy Conference (IRSEC)
. pp.
1
6
.
Bouchrit
R.
,
Boubakri
A.
,
Hafiane
A.
&
Bouguecha
S. A.-T.
2015
Direct contact membrane distillation: capability to treat hyper-saline solution
.
Desalination
376
,
117
129
.
Chen
Q.
,
Burhan
M.
,
Wakil
M.
,
Ybyraiymkul
D.
,
Hassan
F.
,
Li
Y.
&
Choon
K.
2021
A zero liquid discharge system integrating multi-effect distillation and evaporative crystallization for desalination brine treatment
.
Desalination
502
,
114928
.
https:// doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2020.114928
.
Cipolletta
G.
,
Lancioni
N.
,
Akyol
Ç.
,
Eusebi
A. L.
&
Fatone
F.
2021
Brine treatment technologies towards minimum/zero liquid discharge and resource recovery: state of the art and techno-economic assessment
.
Journal of Environmental Management
300
,
113681
.
doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.113681
.
Diaf
A.
,
Cherfa
A.
,
Karadaniz
L.
&
Tigrine
Z.
2016
Technical–economical study of solar desalination
.
Desalination
377
(
1–3
),
123
127
.
doi: 10.1016/j.desal.2015.09.017
.
Do Thi
H. T.
,
Pasztor
T.
,
Fozer
D.
,
Manenti
F.
&
Toth
A. J.
2021
Comparison of desalination technologies using renewable energy sources with life cycle, PESTLE, and multi-criteria decision analyses
.
Water
13
,
3023
.
https://doi.org/10.3390/w13213023
.
Frank
H.
,
Rahav
E.
&
Bar-Zeev
E.
2017
Short-term effects of SWRO desalination brine on benthic heterotrophic microbial communities
.
Desalination
417
,
52
59
.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2017.04.031
.
Giwa
A.
,
Dufour
V.
,
Al Marzooqi
F.
,
Al Kaabi
M.
&
Hasan
S. W.
2017
Brine management methods: recent innovations and current status
.
Desalination
407
,
1
23
.
Hajbi
F.
,
Hammi
H.
&
M'Nif
A.
2010
Reuse of RO desalination plant reject brine
.
Journal of Phase Equilibria and Diffusion
31
(
4
),
341
347
.
Heck
N.
,
Lykkebo Petersen
K.
,
Potts
D. C.
,
Haddad
B.
&
Paytan
A.
2018
Predictors of coastal stakeholders’ knowledge about seawater desalination impacts on marine ecosystems
.
Science of the Total Environment
639
,
785
792
.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j. scitotenv.2018.05.163
.
Ji
X.
,
Curcio
E.
,
Al Obaidani
S.
,
Di Profio
G.
,
Fontananova
E.
&
Enrico
D.
2010
Membrane distillation-crystallization of seawater reverse osmosis brines
.
Separation and Purification Technology
71
,
76
82
.
Jones
E.
,
Qadir
M.
,
Van Vliet
M. T. H.
,
Smakhtin
V.
&
Kang
S.
2019
The state of desalination and brine production: a global outlook
.
Science of the Total Environment
657
,
1343
1356
.
Karbasdehi
V. N.
,
Dobaradaran
S.
,
Nabipour
I.
,
Ostovar
A.
,
Arfaeinia
H.
,
Vazirizadeh
A.
,
Mirahmadi
R.
,
Keshtkar
M.
,
Ghasemi
F. F.
&
Khalifei
F.
et al
2017
Indicator bacteria community in seawater and coastal sediment: the Persian Gulf as a case
.
Journal of Environmental Health Science and Engineering
15
(
1
),
6
.
Liu
J.
,
Yuan
J.
,
Ji
Z.
,
Wang
B.
,
Hao
Y.
&
Guo
X.
2016
Concentrating brine from seawater desalination process by nanofiltration–electrodialysis integrated membrane technology
.
Desalination
390
,
53
61
.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2016.03.012
.
Mickley
M.
2008
Survey of High-recovery and Zero Liquid Discharge. Technologies for Water Utilities. ISBN: 978-1-934183-08-3
.
Mohsenzadeh
M.
,
Aye
L.
&
Christopher
P.
2021
A review on various designs for performance improvement of passive solar stills for remote areas
.
Solar Energy
228
,
594
611
.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2021.09.086
.
Morillo
J.
,
Usero
J.
,
Rosado
D.
,
El Bakouri
H.
,
Riaza
A.
&
Bernaola
F.-J.
2014
Comparative study of brine management technologies for desalination plants
.
Desalination
336
,
32
49
.
Mozas
M.
&
Ghosn
A.
2013
État des lieux du secteur de l'eau en Algérie, IPMEED
.
MRE
2020
(Ministère des Resources en Eau), Algerie. Available from: www.mre.gov.dz.
Mutlq
E.
,
Hamdan
M.
&
Al Asfar
J.
2019
Enhancing the productivity of a roof-type solar still utilizing alumina nanoparticles and vacuum pump
.
Journal of Ecological Engineering
20
,
187
193
.
Nessim
R. B.
,
Tadros
H. R. Z.
,
Abou Taleb
A. E. A.
&
Moawad
M. N.
2015
Chemistry of the Egyptian Mediterranean coastal waters
.
The Egyptian Journal of Aquatic Research
41
,
1
10
.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejar.2015.01.004
Ossandón
K.
,
Pinto
K.
&
Cisternas
L. A. P.
2010
Planning and scheduling of salt harvest in solar evaporation ponds
.
Computers and Chemical Engineering
34
,
620
630
.
Parsa
S. M.
,
Rahbar
A.
,
Koleini
M. H.
,
Javadi
Y. D.
,
Afrand
M.
,
Rostami
S.
&
Amidpour
M.
2020
First approach on nanofluid-based solar still in high altitude for water. Desalination and solar water disinfection (SODIS)
.
Desalination
491
,
114592
.
Pérez-González
A.
,
Urtiaga
A. M.
,
Ibáñez
R.
&
Ortiz
I.
2012
State of the art and review on the treatment technologies of water reverse osmosis concentrates
.
Water Research
46
,
267
283
.
Shalaby
S. M.
,
Sharshir
S. W.
,
Kabeel
A. E.
,
Kandeal
A. W.
,
Abosheiasha
H. F.
,
Abdelgaied
M.
,
Hamed
M. H.
&
Yang
N.
2022
Reverse osmosis desalination systems powered by solar energy: preheating techniques and brine disposal challenges – a detailed review
.
Energy Conversion and Management
251
,
114971
.
ISSN 0196-8904, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2021.114971
.
Sheeba
K. N.
,
Prakash
P.
&
Jaisankar
S.
2015
Performance evaluation of a flat plate collector coupled solar still system
.
Energy Sources, Part A: Recovery, Utilization, and Environmental Effects
37
,
291
298
.
Singh
A. K.
,
Singh
D. B.
,
Dwivedi
V. K.
,
Tiwari
G. N.
&
Gupta
A.
2020
Water purification using solar still with/without nano-fluid: a review
.
Materials Today: Proceedings
21
,
1700
1706
.
Tigrine
Z.
,
Aburideh
H.
,
Abbas
M.
,
Zioui
D.
,
Bellatreche
R.
,
Kasbadji Merzouk
N.
,
Hout
S.
&
Belhout
D.
2015
Experimental investigations on a multi-stage water desalination prototype
.
Desalination and Water Treatment
56
,
2612
2617
.
Tigrine
Z.
,
Kasbadji Merzouk
N.
,
Aburideh
H.
,
Abbas
M.
,
Zioui
D.
,
Belhout
D.
&
Hout
S.
2016
Pilot-scale reverse osmosis for brackish and seawater desalination couple with renewable energy
.
International Journal of Environmental Science
1
,
350
356
.
Tigrine
Z.
,
Aburideh
H.
,
Chekired
F.
,
Belhout
D.
&
Tassalit
D.
2021
New solar still with energy storage: application to the desalination of groundwater in the Bou-Ismail region
.
Water Supply
21
(
8
),
4627
4640
.
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Licence (CC BY 4.0), which permits copying, adaptation and redistribution, provided the original work is properly cited (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).