Simultaneous treatment of synthetic raw water containing natural organic matter (6 mg L−1) and clayey turbidity (0–20 NTU) was carried out with PACl on continuous upflow type pilot-scale models of pulsating floc blanket clarifier (PFBC) and conventional clariflocculator (CC) each designed for a capacity to treat about 8,000 liters per day, to understand mechanistic differences in their functioning. Fluidized bed of pre-flocculated particles prompted contact flocculation and enmeshment which lowered the residual turbidity for PFBC (0.07 ± 0.09 NTU) compared to CC (2.48 ± 1.71 NTU). Fine particles suspended in water clarified from PFBC and CC were hetero-disperse with Zavg as 2,341 nm and 5,693 nm respectively. On average, total residual aluminum was found to be 147 ± 33 ppb and 141 ± 51 ppb, while dissolved residual aluminum was found to be 31 ppb and 59 ppb for PFBC and CC respectively. Average total organic carbon reduction by PFBC and CC was 70.4% and 67.7% respectively. Size, structure and fractal dimensions of flocs were studied and average settling velocity of PFBC flocs was calculated to be 37% higher than CC flocs. Distinctness in characteristics of sludge formed in the two reactors has been highlighted by means of SEM micrographs and FT-IR spectra.

  • PFBC gives better colloidal destabilization and turbidity removal than CC

  • Total residual aluminum comparable but dissolved fraction higher for CC than PFBC

  • Significant aluminum demand raised from NOM satisfied foremost by PACl

  • Average settling velocity of PFBC flocs found to be 37% higher than CC flocs

  • Zone of pre-flocculated particles in PFBC abets nucleation and contact flocculation

Graphical Abstract

Graphical Abstract

Water treatment technology may be seen as a means for efficiently implementing a given unit process(es), for instance, clariflocculation can be carried out in conventional upflow clariflocculators (CCs), floc blanket clarifiers (FBCs) and other systems. In the light of new findings/developments/imposed regulations, either processes need to be made more efficient and/or technologies may also evolve. Conventional clariflocculators have been facing issues related to space requirements, short life of mechanical moving parts, treatment performance under varied influent conditions and in meeting the regulatory requirements that are getting more stringent by the day (Dhabadgaonkar 2008; Edzwald 2020). A zone of densely concentrated suspension of flocculated particles in fluidized state, in other words, a floc blanket may provide some mechanistic advantages in water treatment. However, many aspects of floc blanket clarification, arguably one of the principal treatment processes are less understood (Hendricks 2010). Thus, comparative evaluation of pulsating floc blanket clarification and conventional upflow clariflocculation technologies on a pilot-scale experimental setup (Srivastava et al. 2021a, 2021b) can help in not only explicating the fundamental differences between the two processes but also demonstrate how the theoretical considerations translate to practical performance results.

Natural organic matter (NOM) released into surface water allochthonously or autochthonously poses a serious challenge before water treatment plants (WTPs). It produces aesthetic considerations such as unacceptable taste, color and odor, but more importantly, acts as a precursor to the formation of carcinogenic disinfection by-products. Enhanced coagulation is regarded as the best available technology (BAT) for NOM removal (Saxena et al. 2018, 2019; Lapointe et al. 2021) however high coagulant dosage administered in the process increases the risk of excessive residual aluminum in the finished water (Edzwald 2020; Lapointe et al. 2021). The quandary before WTPs is associated with serious health repercussions since potential neuro-toxic effects of aluminum (Krewski et al. 2007; Willhite et al. 2021) and carcinogenicity originating from NOM (Fang et al. 2010; Chaukura et al. 2020) in treated drinking water have been well documented. Thus, limits for residual aluminum concentration in treated drinking water under Indian regulations (BIS 2012) have been stated as 0.03–0.2 mg L−1 Al and limits for dissolved aluminum concentrations is 0.05–0.2 mg L−1 Al under the United States Environmental Protection Agency regulations (USEPA 1999a). Required percentage total organic carbon (TOC) removal ranges from 10 to 50% depending on the raw water TOC concentration and alkalinity (USEPA 1999b).

The problem is exacerbated since NOM has been reported to undergo complexation reactions with clayey turbidity as well as PACl, mostly resulting in the formation of soluble species (Saxena et al. 2019, 2021). In fact, several full-scale blanket clarifiers in Taiwan using PACl as coagulant had completely lost their blanket during low-turbidity period due to the presence of the humic acid (HA), a major constituent of NOM, in the raw water (Su et al. 2004). Distinct intrinsic mechanisms involved in a given reactor configuration influences inter-related parameters like particle aggregation and destabilization; surface adsorption and coverage; floc characteristics; microfloc formation and kinetics; and finally, the performance of subsequent unit operations. However, the physico-chemical significance of fundamentally different reaction environments provided by PFBC and CC with PACl for simultaneous influx of NOM and clayey turbidity has not been studied in much detail and hence is the focus of this paper. Comparative evaluation of the role that a floc blanket may have on properties of particles and their aggregation behaviour also lends fresh insight on operating WTPs based on either of the two technologies at peak efficiency in such inclement influent conditions.

Experimental setup

A pulsating floc blanket clarifier and conventional clariflocculator in pilot-scale models were designed and fabricated for a capacity to treat about 8,000 liters per day (LPD) of water continuously in an upflow based regime and are presently installed in the Hydraulics Laboratory of Malaviya National Institute of Technology Jaipur, India. For comparatively assessing their performance, the two pilot-scale models were run in parallel with identical operational conditions as depicted schematically in the combined setup (Figure 1). Technical aspects of both pilot plants and description of functions served by different design elements have been elaborated upon elsewhere (Srivastava et al. 2021a, 2021b).
Figure 1

Schematic diagram of experimental setup showing (a) CC and (b) PFBC.

Figure 1

Schematic diagram of experimental setup showing (a) CC and (b) PFBC.

Close modal

For CC, average flow rate was maintained at 3.745 liters per minute (LPM), resulting in an upflow velocity of 0.463 mm s−1 in the clarifier. Detention time (td) and velocity gradient (G) for the rapid mix unit were 30 and 600 s−1 respectively, while td and G for flocculator of CC were 20 minutes and 40 s−1 respectively.

It is difficult to model a PFBC because the solids fraction in the blanket would change due to cyclical admittance of pulses along the characteristic velocity determined by the difference between upflow and downward solids fluxes. The blanket would first converge to a uniform distribution at a lower solids concentration, and after a certain time interval it would compact itself to another uniform distribution at a higher solids fraction, and this process proceeds cyclically. A generalized one-dimensional equation accounting for the spatio-temporal variation of solids fraction in the blanket was proposed by Su et al. (2004) to model the dynamic characteristics of a pulsating floc blanket clarifier:
(1)
where: C = solids fraction, D = effective diffusivity of flocs in the blanket (m2 h−1), t = process time (h), Vsett = settling velocity (m/h) which depends upon C, AVI, df and other parameters, df = floc diameter (m), AVI = floc volume (m3) and z = upward coordinate (measured from the base).
Experiments conducted on the setup showed the formation of a distinct interface between the floc blanket surface and the supernatant above when the steady-state condition was reached. This was in line with the observation of other studies on the floc blanket clarification process (Head et al. 1997; Hurst et al. 2017; Illangasinghe et al. 2019) and indicated that conditions of non-dispersion may be safely assumed. Therefore, Equation (1) simplified to the wave-form and having shock wave solution (Su et al. 2004) may be applied to PFBCs:
(2)

In the given set of experiments, an actuator-solenoid valve system cycle time of 55 seconds was used with ‘on’ time of 10 s and ‘off’ time of 45 s. Continuous rise rate (upflow velocity) was 0.519 mm s−1, and the upflow velocity reached a maximum 2.523 mm s−1 for a period of 10 s during the admittance of pulse. The continuous flow together with the pulsed flow helped maintain a homogeneously suspended blanket for a continuous supply of treated water. The designed average flow rate of 3.745 LPM was maintained throughout the experimental phase in both the pilot plants.

Design of experiments

TOC concentration in surface water generally ranges from 2 to 10 mg L−1. Three years data of surface water characteristics admitted to WTPs in the state of Rajasthan, India show the average monthly peak input turbidity to be about 17 NTU (Saxena et al. 2020). To simulate the surface water conditions in synthetic raw water (SRW), turbidity was varied from 0 NTU to 20 NTU in increments of 5 NTU, while TOC was kept constant at 6 mg L−1. PACl doses optimized for simultaneous NOM and turbidity removal (5, 6, 6, 6 and 8 mg L−1 Al respectively) for each influent condition calculated from the jar tests results (Saxena et al. 2019) were administered continuously to both pilot plants.

An established stable floc blanket is a pre-requisite for satisfactorily operating most floc blanket clarifiers (FBCs), including the pulsating variant. Such a requirement is not posed by CCs. Hurst et al. (2017) had studied the floc blanket growth rate and steady-state suspended solids concentration, and had suggested a continuous dosing of 6.296 mg L−1 Al for an influent kaolin turbidity of 500 NTU for optimal initial floc blanket formation. Thus, the PFBC was initially run as per the recommended settings until the blanket reached the height of 1.2 m before proceeding for experiments on assessment of performance under various influent conditions. The influent stream of SRW was treated in parallel on both pilot plants, simultaneously running under similar operational conditions (Figure 1). For continuous flow type pilot plants, steady state is reached after about 5 hours (), thus samples of clarified water were collected after the setup was run for 6 hours to allow proper stabilization.

Reagents

Tap water supplied at Malaviya National Institute of Technology Jaipur having alkalinity in the range of 180–205 mg L−1 (as CaCO3) and negligible TOC (<0.069 mg L−1) was used in preparation of SRW. Kaolin clay (Loba Chemie Pvt. Ltd, Mumbai, India) was used to synthetically impart turbidity (Hurst et al. 2017; Saxena et al. 2019) to the influent stream of raw water. NOM was simulated by the addition of HA (Sigma-Aldrich Corp., Missouri, USA) to influent water. For the preparation of stock solution, 1.5 g of powdered HA and 0.01 M NaOH (Rankem, Avantor Inc., Pennsylvania, USA) were added to 1 L of de-ionized (DI) water. After stirring the solution for 5 hours to ensure complete dissolution, the TOC of the stock solution was measured to be 736.9 mg L−1. High basicity polyaluminum chloride (PACl) (Aditya Birla Chemicals, Grasim Industries Ltd, Nagda, Madhya Pradesh, India) was used as coagulant.

Analytical methods

Measurement of turbidity was carried out in accordance with the 2130 B Nephelometric Method (APHA 2012, Part 2000 Physical and Aggregate Properties) on a portable digital nephelometer (TU-2016, Lutron Electronic Enterprise Co. Ltd, Taipei, Taiwan) and pH was measured on a portable pH meter (Hanna HI98130, Rhode Island, USA). The 2320 B standard titrimetric method (APHA 2012, Part 2000 Physical and Aggregate Properties) was followed for calculation of alkalinity. TOC was measured in accordance with the 5310 B high-temperature combustion method (APHA 2012, Part 5000 Aggregate Organic Constituents) on a total organic carbon analyzer, TOC-L (Shimadzu Corp., Kyoto, Japan) at combustion temperatures of 680 °C with catalytic oxidation.

The analysis for residual aluminum was carried out in accordance with the 3500-Al B Eriochrome Cyanine R Method (APHA 2012, Part 3000 Metals) on a spectrophotometer (UV 1800, Shimadzu Corp., Kyoto, Japan) at a wavelength of 535 nm using a 1 cm path length glass cuvette. Total and dissolved residual aluminum concentrations were measured in accordance with the methodology described by van Benschoten & Edzwald (1990). To measure total residual aluminum, solubilization was carried out with the help of trace metal grade concentrated HNO3 (Fisher Scientific, Massachusetts, USA). Undigested clarified water samples were first passed through a 0.22 μm pore size polymeric membrane filter with the help of a vacuum pump. The filtrate so obtained was then tested for aluminum after acidification as per procedure described above to obtain the dissolved residual aluminum. Difference between total and dissolved residual aluminum gives the particulate fraction. All samples and reagents used in the process were prepared or stored in polypropylene ware instead of glassware to avoid any error in trace aluminum determination. Glass cuvettes and wares used in determination step were rinsed with 1 + 1 HNO3 and deionized water.

A Zetasizer® Nano ZS instrument (Malvern Instruments, Malvern, UK) utilizing the dynamic light scattering (DLS) technique was employed to measure zetapotential and the size of fine suspended colloidal particles in clarified water. The microscopic analysis according to a modified approach described by Srivastava et al. (2021a) was used to determine the size of flocs since they are larger and amenable to settle over time. A CX21i Microscope (Olympus Corp., Tokyo, Japan) and digital camera assembly, Magcam HD L (Magnus Opto Systems India Pvt. Ltd, New Delhi, India) using a 1/2.5′ CMOS image sensor was used to capture high resolution images (2,464 × 1,632 pixels) at ×10 optical magnification. Magvision® software (Magnus Opto Systems India Pvt. Ltd, New Delhi, India) was used for layering, scaling and primary image analysis. Further image analysis, including particle size analysis (PSA) was done with the help of open source software ImageJ distributed by Fiji (Schindelin et al. 2015).

Sludge samples were collected from PFBC and CC pilot plants with the help of peristaltic pumps. The samples were first transferred to porcelain crucibles and then completely dried in a hot air oven (LabSmith, Inc., California, USA) at 150 °C temperature. Field emission-scanning electron microscopy (FE-SEM) was carried out on a Nova Nano FE-SEM 450 (FEI, Oregon, USA) at ×10,000 magnification to analyze the surface morphology and microstructure of sludge. Fourier transform infrared (FT-IR) analysis of sludge was carried out on IR Spectrum Two™ spectrophotometer (PerkinElmer, Inc., Massachusetts, USA) for identifying characteristic species.

Zeta potential and turbidity

The variation in turbidity and zeta potential (ξ) of the water clarified from PFBC and CC receiving equivalent optimized PACl doses for different influent conditions is shown in Figure 2. The values of turbidity here correspond to the brownish turbid color imparted by NOM in addition to the clayey turbidity from kaolin. The turbidity remaining in the clarified water from CC was 2.48 NTU on an average with a standard deviation (σ) of ±1.71. For PFBC, a lower average residual turbidity value of 0.07 NTU (σ = ±0.09) was observed in clarified water. The difference between the CC and PFBC residual turbidity values may be attributed to the presence of the floc blanket in PFBC. The blanket may be visualized as a media filter comprised of pre-formed flocs which aided the capture of colloidal particles/freshly formed microflocs by means of enmeshment by well grown large flocs. Collision between the given entities is exponentially higher in the fluidized zone, resulting in adsorption like flocculation apart from entrapment due to bridging and charge-neutralization mechanisms (Chowdhury et al. 1993; Srivastava et al. 2021a). This is also indicated by the formation of a distinct blanket-water interface at the height of 1.2 m measured from the bottom baseline (Figure 1).
Figure 2

Residual turbidity and zeta potential of clarified water samples.

Figure 2

Residual turbidity and zeta potential of clarified water samples.

Close modal

Polynuclear aluminum species like Al13 present in abundance in high basicity PACl were effective in capturing and neutralizing negatively charged colloidal particles which brought the ξ values within a range of −2.4 mV to −6.8 mV for PFBC and −3.2 mV to −11.3 mV for CC (Figure 2). Low standard deviation for PFBC (σ = 1.54) may be attributed to the buffering action of the blanket. It can also be seen that ξavg was lower in magnitude for PFBC (| − 4.7| mV) as compared to CC (| − 6.6| mV) which perhaps indicates better destabilization. However, on simultaneous observation of the combined variation trends in turbidity and ξ, it may inferred that particle destabilization was not the only factor responsible for such marked differences in the residual turbidity between PFBC and CC, and that perhaps other mechanisms, such as contact flocculation (Tambo & Hozumi 1979; Hauduc et al. 2019), charge neutralization (Lin & Ika 2019; Lapointe et al. 2021) and enmeshment (Chen et al. 2016) were dominant in the zone of densely concentrated suspension of pre-flocculated particles in fluidized state inside PFBC.

Fine particles in suspension

DLS technique can be employed to estimate the diameter of fine suspended colloidal particles in the clarified water which do not settle over time owing to their small size. Such an estimation can provide some insight into how the floc growth/re-growth occurs at nanoscale. The particle size distribution is reported by intensity and the mean value from the intensity distribution, also called Z-average gives the average particle diameter (Figure 3). Polydispersity index (PdI) was used to describe the distribution width of the peak and was calculated by the following relation:
(3)
where, PdI = polydispersity index; σ = standard deviation; Zavg = mean diameter
Figure 3

Mean particle size (from distribution by intensity) and polydispersity index of fine suspended colloidal particles in water clarified from PFBC and CC.

Figure 3

Mean particle size (from distribution by intensity) and polydispersity index of fine suspended colloidal particles in water clarified from PFBC and CC.

Close modal

Firstly, to assess the size distribution of individual constituents comprising the SRW, PSA of stock HA and kaolin suspension were measured and the particle size distribution was found to be 267 ± 60 nm and 2,300 ± 540 nm respectively (Saxena et al. 2019). The respective stocks after requisite dilution were used in the preparation of SRW and subsequently underwent coagulation–flocculation unit process in the two types of reactors with coagulant PACl. Further PSA of fine particles which remain in suspension in the clarified water was carried out and it was found that Zavg for CC (5,693 nm) was larger on average as compared to PFBC (2,341 nm). Equal average PdI value of 0.81 was recorded for samples from both PFBC and CC, and this relatively large value indicates the condition of hetero-dispersity. Saxena et al. (2021) noted that interactions between hetero-dispersed impurities improve coagulation and significantly impact floc properties.

The results depicted in Figure 3 observed in conjunction with zeta potential data points given in Figure 2 indicated that due to adequate colloidal destabilization, the microfloc formation proceeded well past the submicron range. However further growth/agglomeration of microflocs beyond a certain threshold is required to form a settleable floc, or else they may remain suspended. Smaller cut-off size along with lower residual turbidity for PFBC indicates that the fine particles in suspension may have aggregated to form larger flocs and settled down. Nevertheless, the fine colloidal particles in suspension were supramicron size (>1 μm) for both pilot plants and the subsequent filtration unit process has been reported to be more effective in their removal (Chowdhury et al. 1993). Owing to the size of these particles, a reduction in the particulate residual aluminum may also be expected after filtration for both PFBC and CC (Srivastava et al. 2021b).

Residual aluminum, pH and organics

Many water treatment facilities across the world struggle to adhere to the guidelines suggested by WHO (2017) even for the maximum permissible residual aluminum limit of 200 parts per billion (ppb) set for small water treatment facilities, whereas the mark currently set for large water treatment facilities is 100 ppb. It was shown by Srivastava et al. (2021a) that particulate form comprises the major fraction (≈ 72%) of the total residual aluminum and this proportionality holds irrespective of the level of total residual aluminum when influent clayey turbidity is treated using PACl either by PFBCs or CCs. However, given that NOM interacts with clayey turbidity (Saxena et al. 2019, 2021) and readily forms complexes with added aluminum (Tsai et al. 2020), the amount of residual aluminum in clarified water is bound to be affected when influent water contains clayey turbidity and NOM. The fractionation of such aluminum residuals in water clarified by PFBC and CC is shown in Figure 4.
Figure 4

Total, dissolved and particulate residual aluminum (Res Al) in water clarified from PFBC and CC.

Figure 4

Total, dissolved and particulate residual aluminum (Res Al) in water clarified from PFBC and CC.

Close modal

The average total residual aluminum level for CC (141 ppb) was marginally lower than for PFBC (147 ppb). However, notwithstanding the rather similar total residual aluminum levels, the concentration of residual aluminum in dissolved form for CC (0.059 ppm) was markedly higher than the average dissolved residual aluminum for PFBC (0.031 ppm). It may be observed that the particulate fraction was found to comprise of total residual aluminum in clarified water for PFBC while the value for CC was .

Dissimilarity in the respective proportions can be explained on the basis of the compensation brought about by the presence of pre-formed floc blanket for PFBC. As the coagulated water sifts upwards through the fluidized bed of primarily kaolin flocs in the PFBC, perhaps precipitation of dissolved species occurs at the nucleation sites provided by the flocs and compensation by the clayey matter leads to residual aluminum fractionation results similar to those offered by Srivastava et al. (2021a). Conversely, the relative concentration of alumino-organic complexes ought to be higher in CC since the floc formation is effected by rapid mixed constituents (influent SRW and PACl) alone. Thus, it may be inferred that dissolved residual aluminum concentration was increased due to relatively higher NOM.

Variation of pH of the clarified water was within a narrow band of 7.39–7.91 (Figure 5) since the supplied water had high alkalinity (180–205 mg L−1 as CaCO3) and high basicity variant PACl was used as coagulant. It was also observed that there was negligible difference in the pH and temperature of treated water between the two pilots and the average temperature of the experimental data-set was 26.5 °C (σ = ±0.27). Standard aluminum solubility curve plotted for high basicity PACl for warm water at 20 °C exhibits minima in the pH range of 6.3–6.8, and subsequently for increasing pH the slope (m) is less steep (Edzwald 2020). Higher dissolved residual aluminum fraction even at pH conducive to aluminum precipitation indicates that NOM readily formed soluble complexes with various aluminum forms.
Figure 5

Variation in pH and TOC in water clarified from PFBC and CC.

Figure 5

Variation in pH and TOC in water clarified from PFBC and CC.

Close modal

Furthermore, it can be observed from Figure 5 that the average TOC in clarified water from CC was 1.936 mg L−1 whereas analysis of TOC for PFBC gave a slightly lower value of 1.776 mg L−1 on average. This observation may be explained on the basis of interactions reported between HA and kaolin from the floc blanket if there is a low HA range of 4 and 8 mg L−1 (Saxena et al. 2021). Although the alkalinity of SRW used was >120 ppm (as CaCO3), both pilot plants were able to reduce TOC concentration by which was well above the maximum stipulated percentage reduction required (50%) by USEPA (1999b) for any alkalinity/source water TOC bracket. It may also be observed from Figure 5 that there is little mesial variation of the tight cluster of points with increase in influent turbidity as indicated by the average slope (m = 0.016). Thus, it may be inferred that PACl is first utilized to meet a significant aluminum demand raised by NOM before it can serve as an effective coagulant (Edzwald & van Benschoten 1990). Therefore, under low-turbidity and high organics conditions, optimization of coagulant doses in the enhanced coagulation range is a more important factor otherwise the HA would complex with clayey flocs and deplete the blanket.

Flocs

In Figure 6, the micrographs for CC and PFBC have been juxtaposed to show the distinction between the generated flocs in the two reactors, all things being equal, under different influent conditions. The transformation in floc development with increasing influent turbidity has also been displayed (Figure 6). Various parameters of each detected floc in a micrograph were determined. Since flocs are of irregular and elongated structure, an ellipse can be fitted for each floc based on the second order moments of the projected two-dimensional area. The three-dimensional structure of the floc can be assumed to be an ellipsoid obtained by rotating the fitted ellipse about its major axis, which also represents the characteristic length (l) of a floc (Chakraborti et al. 2007).
Figure 6

Micrographs of flocs for influent conditions of 6 mg L−1 TOC and clayey turbidity of (a) 0 NTU for CC; (b) 0 NTU for PFBC; (c) 5 NTU for CC; (d) 5 NTU for PFBC; (e) 10 NTU for CC; (f) 10 NTU for PFBC; (g) 15 NTU for CC; (h) 15 NTU for PFBC; (i) 20 NTU for CC; and (j) 20 NTU for PFBC.

Figure 6

Micrographs of flocs for influent conditions of 6 mg L−1 TOC and clayey turbidity of (a) 0 NTU for CC; (b) 0 NTU for PFBC; (c) 5 NTU for CC; (d) 5 NTU for PFBC; (e) 10 NTU for CC; (f) 10 NTU for PFBC; (g) 15 NTU for CC; (h) 15 NTU for PFBC; (i) 20 NTU for CC; and (j) 20 NTU for PFBC.

Close modal
Two- and three-dimensional fractal dimensions were calculated by regression analysis after taking logarithms of Equations (4) and (5) respectively,
(4)
(5)

Therefore, fractal dimensions so computed do not describe the property of an individual floc but represent an overall fitting parameter for entire population of flocs in a specific sample. For samples from CC (C1−5) and PFBC (P1−5), for different influent conditions the resulting fractal dimensions in two dimensions (D2) and in three dimensions (D3) with their standard error (SE), coefficient of determination (R2), population (N), mean characteristic length (l), mean projected surface area (As), mean circularity (C) and settling velocity (Ws) ratio are mentioned in Table 1.

Table 1
 
 

Irregular shape and boundary (P) of the flocs can be quantified in terms of circularity (C) given by the following equation:
(6)
The value of C approaches unity for a round structure, and the obtained moderate values (Table 1) are typical of flocs formed with PACl (Jarvis et al. 2005). However, it may be noted that flocs formed in a PFBC were more irregular (Cavg = 0.37), whereas CC flocs had comparatively smoother boundaries (Cavg = 0.44). This distinctness in characteristics may be attributed to the relatively higher concentration of NOM in the flocs of CC and has been discussed in greater detail in Sections 3.5 and 3.6. Analysis of As for the entire population of flocs shows that PFBC flocs were larger than CC flocs on average by 31.2%. Similar distinctness in characteristics is also clearly reflected in the SEM images (Figure 7) of the sludge from PFBC and CC.
Figure 7

SEM micrographs for sludge generated with PACl in (a) PFBC; and (b) CC.

Figure 7

SEM micrographs for sludge generated with PACl in (a) PFBC; and (b) CC.

Close modal

Fractal analysis data were highly correlated for all cases and presented low error values . The range of D2 values as well as D3 values for flocs formed with PACl is in good agreement with the respective reported values (Chakraborti et al. 2007; Lv et al. 2021). The average D2 and D3 values for CC were 1.93 and 2.86 respectively while the average D2 and D3 values for PFBC were calculated to be 1.90 and 2.79 respectively. It may be noted that the fractal dimensions for CC were higher than PFBC by a small margin. Generally, D3 is < 2 for sweep flocculation mechanism, while the given D3 values for both technologies indicate inter-particle bridging to have been the dominant mechanism for floc formation. From the D3 and mean l values, it may also be inferred that reaction-limited aggregation (RLA) process was followed rather than diffusion-limited aggregation (DLA) process (Chakraborti et al. 2007). Therefore, more consolidated chain-like aggregates with deeply embedded particles were formed (Srivastava et al. 2021a).

The floc properties discussed above have a complex inter-relationship in determining a parameter of immense practical importance, i.e. the settling velocity (Ws), which can be expressed in fractal geometry as:
(7)

It may be noted that while the correlation between Ws and l is direct, the three-dimensional fractal dimension (D3) has a positive whereas the two-dimensional fractal dimension (D2) has a negative exponential correlation with Ws. The color-coded scales shown in Table 1 allow ready comparison of the relative magnitudes of l, D2 and D3 of CC and PFBC flocs for mapping the combined effect on the settling velocity. On taking the weighted average on the basis of the population of flocs (N), the Ws for PFBC was found to be about 37% higher than the value for CC. Therefore, the results indicate that the overall size and structure of the flocs generated in a PFBC were such that they were more amenable to settling as compared to conventionally formed flocs.

Scanning electron microscopy

Scanning electron microscopy showed that the sludge of PFBC (Figure 7(a)) was more compact than CC sludge (Figure 7(b)). Dissimilitude in the floc formation can be clearly observed at high magnification. This marked difference in the morphologies of the sludge from PFBC and CC may be attributed to the relatively higher concentration of clayey turbidity from kaolin due to the presence of the blanket in PFBC resulting in formation of surface features on the floc. For PFBC flocs, the main voluminous surface coverage is by kaolin, and Al13 aggregates adsorbed on the surface of the kaolin particles extend to attach other particles in the interior of PACl-Al13 agglomerate. Conversely, the relative concentration of NOM is higher in CC flocs and sludge. The results visually reveal the second level of the structure proposed by Verrelli et al. (2009) which had predicted the adherence of a thick ‘fluffy’ layer of material, perhaps NOM, to the surface of the otherwise hard and small particulates.

FT-IR spectroscopy

To identify characteristic molecular bonds/stretches and chemical species in the flocs, FT-IR analysis of PACl sludge was conducted. As expected, the FT-IR spectra (Figure 8) for the sludge generated in PFBC and CC appear somewhat similar, primarily due to the same SRW and coagulant. However, differences may be noted in the percentage transmittance (% T) values at various wavelengths that can be correlated with the relative concentration of the corresponding species in the sludge sample. The peak obtained at around 1,033 cm−1 exhibited very low transmittance of and for PFBC and CC respectively. This may correspond to bending at the bond with the tetrahedron structure (Dubey et al. 2018) and stretching of the bond and confirms that, among aluminum species, Al(OH)3 formation is dominant in the precipitate even for PACl. Furthermore, it binds with silica from clayey turbidity in relative abundance. A difference may be noted in the percentage transmittance () for the absorption band at around 3,621 cm−1 between PFBC (Figure 8(a)) and CC (Figure 8(b)) arising from the hydroxyl groups between the tetrahedral and octahedral surfaces formed by silica (Saxena & Brighu 2020). The lower transmittance values for PFBC (Figure 8(a)) indicate that the above specified species were relatively more abundant in PFBC sludge than in CC sludge. It may also be inferred from the values that the pulsations in a PFBC resulted in a significantly more compacted sludge.
Figure 8

FT-IR spectrum for sludge generated with PACl in (a) PFBC; and (b) CC.

Figure 8

FT-IR spectrum for sludge generated with PACl in (a) PFBC; and (b) CC.

Close modal

Comparative assessment of a PFBC and CC was carried out under a constant NOM influx for a range of influent turbidity conditions with PACl used as a coagulant. Mechanisms like contact flocculation and enmeshment were dominant in the conditions offered by the dense suspension of flocculated particles in fluidized state, which resulted in better colloidal destabilization and capture in a PFBC. The cyclical contraction and expansion also helped in significant compaction of sludge. Average total residual aluminum level was brought below the 200 ppb mark and an ∼ 68–70% reduction in TOC was achieved by both CC and PFBC. NOM was observed to readily interact with kaolin present in both influent as well as blanket and also raise a significant aluminum demand. The demand for aluminum was satisfied foremost by PACl before it could serve as an effective coagulant and their interaction resulted in the formation of predominantly soluble alumino-organic complexes. This led to a much higher average percentage of dissolved residual aluminum () for CC. However, PFBC was less affected (average dissolved residual aluminum ) since the blanket acted as a buffer and provided nucleation sites which aided precipitation. The flocs formed in a PFBC were on average larger by about 31% and their surface structure was observed to be markedly distinct from the flocs formed in CC. Therefore, the average settling velocity of PFBC flocs, computed on the basis of resulting fractal dimensions was ∼ 37% higher than for the CC flocs.

We acknowledge the support of Materials Research Centre (MRC) at Malaviya National Institute of Technology Jaipur, India in carrying out nanoparticle size analysis (nano-PSA), zeta potential analysis, FT-IR spectroscopy and SEM at their facilities.

All relevant data are included in the paper or its Supplementary Information.

The authors declare there is no conflict.

APHA (American Public Health Association)
2012
Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater
, 22nd edn. (
Rice
E. W.
,
Baird
R. B.
,
Eaton
A. D.
&
Clesceri
L. S.
, eds).
APHA, American Water Works Association (AWWA) & Water Environment Federation (WEF)
,
Washington, DC
,
USA
.
BIS (Bureau of Indian Standards)
2012
Drinking Water – Specification (Second Revision of IS 10500), Section: Drinking Water (FAD 25)
.
Food and Agriculture Division, BIS
,
New Delhi
,
India
.
Chakraborti
R. K.
,
Gardner
K. H.
,
Kaur
J.
&
Atkinson
J. F.
2007
In situ analysis of flocs
.
Journal of Water Supply: Research and Technology – AQUA
56
(
1
),
1
11
.
doi: 10.2166/aqua.2007.063
.
Chaukura
N.
,
Marais
S. S.
,
Moyo
W.
,
Mbali
N.
,
Thakalekoala
L. C.
,
Ingwani
T.
,
Mamba
B. B.
,
Jarvis
P.
&
Nkambule
T. T. I.
2020
Contemporary issues on the occurrence and removal of disinfection byproducts in drinking water – A review
.
Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering
8
(
2
),
103659
.
doi: 10.1016/J.JECE.2020.103659
.
Chen
T.
,
Xu
Y.
,
Wang
D.
,
Shi
W.
&
Cui
F.
2016
The impact of recycling sludge on water quality in coagulation for treating low-turbidity source water
.
Desalination and Water Treatment
57
(
31
),
14433
14442
.
Chowdhury
Z. K.
,
Amy
G. L.
&
Bales
R. C.
1993
Incorporation of submicron colloids into larger floc in water treatment
.
Journal of Environmental Engineering
119
(
1
),
192
199
.
doi:10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9372(1993)119:1(192)
.
Dhabadgaonkar
S. M.
2008
Jet floccu-clarifiers: appropriate technology for water treatment in India
.
Journal of Indian Water Works Association
2008
,
21
39
.
Dubey
S.
,
Agarwal
M.
&
Gupta
A. B.
2018
Experimental investigation of Al-F species formation and transformation during coagulation for fluoride removal using alum and PACl
.
Journal of Molecular Liquids
266
,
349
360
.
doi: 10.1016/j.molliq.2018.06.080
.
Edzwald
J. K.
2020
Aluminum in drinking water: occurrence, effects, and control
.
Journal – American Water Works Association
112
(
5
),
34
41
.
doi: 10.1002/awwa.1499
.
Edzwald
J. K.
&
van Benschoten
J. E.
1990
Aluminum coagulation of natural organic matter
. In:
Chemical Water and Wastewater Treatment
.
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
,
Berlin, Heidelberg
, pp.
341
359
.
doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-76093-8_22
.
Fang
J.
,
Ma
J.
,
Yang
X.
&
Shang
C.
2010
Formation of carbonaceous and nitrogenous disinfection by-products from the chlorination of Microcystis aeruginosa
.
Water Research
44
(
6
),
1934
1940
.
doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2009.11.046
.
Hauduc
H.
,
Wadhawan
T.
,
Takacs
I.
,
Al-Omari
A.
,
de Clippeleir
H.
,
Wett
B.
,
Jimenez
J.
&
Rahman
A.
2019
Colloids, flocculation and carbon capture – a comprehensive plant-wide model
.
Water Science and Technology
79
(
1
),
15
25
.
doi: 10.2166/wst.2018.454
.
Head
R.
,
Hart
J.
&
Graham
N.
1997
Simulating the effect of blanket characteristics on the floc blanket clarification process
.
Water Science and Technology
36
(
4
),
77
84
.
doi: 10.1016/S0273-1223(97)00422-8
.
Hendricks
D.
2010
Fundamentals of Water Treatment Unit Processes: Physical, Chemical, and Biological
.
CRC Press
,
Boca Raton, FL
,
USA
.
Hurst
M.
,
Weber-Shirk
M.
&
Lion
L. W.
2017
Influence of alum coagulant dose and influent turbidity on floc blanket growth rate, steady-state suspended solids concentration, and turbidity removal
.
Journal of Environmental Engineering
143
(
2
),
04016081
.
doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)EE.1943-7870.0001131
.
Illangasinghe
W.
,
Ratnayake
N.
,
Manatunge
J.
&
Jayasuriya
N.
2019
Cohesivity, formation of particle clusters, and blanket settling velocity in a fluidized bed
.
Journal of Environmental Engineering
145
(
4
),
04019003
.
doi: 10.1061/(asce)ee.1943-7870.0001512
.
Jarvis
P.
,
Jefferson
B.
,
Gregory
J.
&
Parsons
S. A.
2005
A review of floc strength and breakage
.
Water Research
39
(
14
),
3121
3137
.
doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2005.05.022
.
Krewski
D.
,
Yokel
R. A.
,
Nieboer
E.
,
Borchelt
D.
,
Cohen
J.
,
Harry
J.
,
Kacew
S.
,
Lindsay
J.
,
Mahfouz
A. M.
&
Rondeau
V.
2007
Human health risk assessment for aluminium, aluminium oxide, and aluminium hydroxide
.
Journal of Toxicology and Environmental Health – Part B: Critical Reviews
10
(
SUPPL. 1
),
1
269
.
doi: 10.1080/10937400701597766
.
Lapointe
M.
,
Papineau
I.
,
Peldszus
S.
,
Peleato
N.
&
Barbeau
B.
2021
Identifying the best coagulant for simultaneous water treatment objectives: interactions of mononuclear and polynuclear aluminum species with different natural organic matter fractions
.
Journal of Water Process Engineering
40
(
November
).
doi: 10.1016/j.jwpe.2020.101829
.
Lin
J. L.
&
Ika
A. R.
2019
Effect of Al speciation on residual turbidity and Al minimization by coagulation with single and dual dosing
.
Journal of Water Supply: Research and Technology – AQUA
68
(
1
),
51
62
.
doi: 10.2166/aqua.2018.207
.
Lv
M.
,
Li
D.
,
Zhang
Z.
,
Logan
B. E.
,
Peter van der Hoek
J.
,
Sun
M.
,
Chen
F.
&
Feng
Y.
2021
Magnetic seeding coagulation: effect of Al species and magnetic particles on coagulation efficiency, residual Al, and floc properties
.
Chemosphere
268
,
129363
.
doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2020.129363
.
Saxena
K.
&
Brighu
U.
2020
Optimized coagulation of humic acid and mineral turbidity at alkaline pH using high basicity PACl
.
Water Science and Technology: Water Supply
20
(
6
),
2324
2338
.
doi: 10.2166/ws.2020.141
.
Saxena
K.
,
Brighu
U.
&
Choudhary
A.
2018
Parameters affecting enhanced coagulation: a review
.
Environmental Technology Reviews
7
(
1
),
156
176
.
doi: 10.1080/21622515.2018.1478456
.
Saxena
K.
,
Brighu
U.
&
Choudhary
A.
2019
Coagulation of humic acid and kaolin at alkaline pH: complex mechanisms and effect of fluctuating organics and turbidity
.
Journal of Water Process Engineering
31
(
February
),
100875
.
doi: 10.1016/j.jwpe.2019.100875
.
Saxena
K.
,
Brighu
U.
&
Choudhary
A.
2020
Pilot-scale coagulation of organic and inorganic impurities: mechanisms, role of particle concentration and scale effects
.
Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering
103990
.
doi 10.1016/j.jece.2020.103990
.
Saxena
K.
,
Brighu
U.
&
Choudhary
A.
2021
Experimental investigation and modelling the effect of humic acid on coagulation efficiency for sludge blanket clarifier
.
Chemosphere
266
,
128958
.
doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2020.128958
.
Schindelin
J.
,
Rueden
C. T.
,
Hiner
M. C.
&
Eliceiri
K. W.
2015
The ImageJ ecosystem: an open platform for biomedical image analysis
.
Molecular Reproduction and Development
82
(
7–8
),
518
529
.
doi: 10.1002/mrd.22489
.
Srivastava
S.
,
Brighu
U.
&
Gupta
A. B.
2021b
Performance assessment of pulsating floc blanket clarifiers and conventional clariflocculators in pilot-scale models
.
Water Environment Research
93
(
6
),
887
895
.
doi: 10.1002/wer.1479
.
Su
S. T.
,
Wu
R. M.
&
Lee
D. J.
2004
Blanket dynamics in upflow suspended bed
.
Water Research
38
(
1
),
89
96
.
doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2003.09.002
.
Tambo
N.
&
Hozumi
H.
1979
Physical aspect of flocculation process-II. Contact flocculation
.
Water Research
13
,
441
448
.
doi: 10.1016/0043-1354(79)90036-8
.
Tsai
M. H.
,
Hua
L. C.
,
Huang
K.
&
Huang
C.
2020
NOM removal and residual Al minimization by enhanced coagulation: roles of sequence dosing with PACl-FeCl3
.
Journal of Water Supply: Research and Technology – AQUA
69
(
6
),
616
628
.
doi: 10.2166/aqua.2020.010
.
United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA)
1999a
Drinking Water Standards
.
Public Health Services Publication
,
Washington, DC
,
USA
.
United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA)
1999b
Enhanced Coagulation and Enhanced Precipitative Softening Guidance Manual
.
USEPA, Office of Water
,
Washington, DC
,
USA
.
van Benschoten
J. E.
&
Edzwald
J. K.
1990
Measuring aluminum during water treatment
.
Methodology and Application. Journal/American Water Works Association
82
(
5
),
71
78
.
doi: 10.1002/j.1551-8833.1990.tb06966.x
.
Verrelli
D. I.
,
Dixon
D. R.
&
Scales
P. J.
2009
Colloids and surfaces A : physicochemical and engineering aspects effect of coagulation conditions on the dewatering properties of sludges produced in drinking water treatment
.
Colloids and Surfaces A: Physicochemical and Engineering Aspects
348
(
1–3
),
14
23
.
doi: 10.1016/j.colsurfa.2009.06.013
.
WHO (World Health Organization)
2017
Guidelines for Drinking-Water Quality, Fourth edn
.
WHO
,
Geneva
,
Switzerland
.
Willhite
C. C.
,
Karyakina
N. A.
,
Nordheim
E.
,
Arnold
I.
,
Armstrong
V.
,
Momoli
F.
,
Shilnikova
N. S.
,
Yenugadhati
N.
&
Krewski
D.
2021
The REACH registration process: a case study of metallic aluminium, aluminium oxide and aluminium hydroxide
.
NeuroToxicology
83
,
166
178
.
doi: 10.1016/j.neuro.2020.12.004
.
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Licence (CC BY 4.0), which permits copying, adaptation and redistribution, provided the original work is properly cited (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).