Ecological water replenishment (EWR) has been widely implemented for the restoration of the groundwater resources in the North China Plain since 2018, and the Hutuo River is one of the typical rivers. Recovering the groundwater storage capacity while ensuring the safety of the existing land use is essential for groundwater management. To simulate the groundwater response to different recharge schemes, and to determine the optimal recharge strategy that has the maximum amount of water recharged into the aquifers under specific constraints, an optimization framework, which integrates a 3D transient groundwater flow model with a genetic algorithm (GA), was realized in a Python programming environment in this study. The optimization results show that the optimal amount of water recharged into aquifers is 5.36 × 109 m3 from January 2020 to December 2029, and the upper river reaches are the main recharge area, accounting for 67.58% of the total. Compared with constant recharge, optimal results indicate that the total amount of water recharged into aquifers will increase without exceeding the upper limits of the groundwater levels. However, as groundwater exploitation reduces (18.44%), the river's optimal amount of water recharged also decreases (17.23%). Therefore, the developed model can identify the optimal groundwater recharge strategy and eventually facilitate decision-making in the case of EWR.

  • Optimal groundwater replenishment strategy from the Hutuo River in the case of ecological water replenishment.

  • An optimization framework was developed relying on a groundwater flow model and GA.

  • Existing land use limits the restoration of the groundwater resources.

  • Nonlinear programming problem in groundwater management was solved by GA.

Graphical Abstract

Graphical Abstract
Graphical Abstract

Groundwater is one of the most valuable natural resources for industry, agriculture, and human livelihoods (Khosravi et al. 2018). However, as the principal source of water supply in the North China Plain (NCP), groundwater is inevitably overused, which has led to a series of geological and environmental problems (e.g., groundwater levels drawdown and land subsidence) (Kinzelbach et al. 2022). On the other hand, long-term overexploitation of groundwater caused a constantly declining in groundwater levels and the formation of extremely thick vadose zone, which provides storage space for groundwater replenishment from the river (Fei et al. 2011). Moreover, the operation of the middle route of the South-to-North Water Diversion Project (m-SNWDP) has provided opportunities to restore groundwater storage in the NCP by increasing water supply and reducing groundwater exploitation since December 2014 (Zhang & Li 2014; Long et al. 2020).

Under the circumstances, ecological water replenishment (EWR) has been carried out in the NCP since September 2018. Over 22 rivers along the water transfer channel receive water from the m-SNWDP to replenish groundwater and improve water quality in the receiving areas. (Li et al. 2018; Ding et al. 2019; Sun et al. 2021). Hutuo River, as one of the first pilot rivers for EWR, is referred to as ‘the Mother River’ by the natives of Shijiazhuang, a provincial city of Hebei. However, due to anthropogenic activity and climate change, the river channel flow has been continuously interrupted since the 1970s. In addition, the groundwater quality of the Hutuo River alluvial fan continues to deteriorate as a result of the leaching and nitrification reactions promoted by the overexploitation of groundwater (Omer et al. 2016; Zhang et al. 2019). Previous research indicated that the Hutuo River has the top priority for groundwater replenishment (Zhu et al. 2020). However, there is little research on the optimal groundwater recharge from different reaches of the Hutuo River, especially in the case of large-scale EWR.

Although river infiltration replenishing aquifer is effective for restoring groundwater resources, excessively high groundwater levels will cause corresponding environmental and engineering safety issues, such as soil salinization (Shokri-Kuehni et al. 2020) and interference with underground structures (Gattinoni & Scesi 2017). Therefore, the selection of a reasonable recharge strategy is crucial in the process of groundwater replenishment. However, designing the feasible and efficient operation of groundwater replenishment is far from simple, because the aquifers’ characteristics are usually complex, and the response of water levels to recharge is nonlinear (Hao et al. 2018). Therefore, to find a satisfactory groundwater recharge scheme, it is significant to figure out the states and characteristics of the groundwater flow and various land use constraints.

Coupling analytical or numerical groundwater simulation models with optimization algorithms is a common approach to solving such problems. The simulation-optimization (S/O) method is a powerful tool employed to solve groundwater resources management problems in many fields (Singh 2014). Previous studies suggest that the S/O model was used in groundwater remediation strategy (Mategaonkar & Eldho 2012), seawater intrusion management for coastal aquifers (Dentoni et al. 2014), and optimal management of the artificial recharge-pumping system (Kawo et al. 2018). However, coupled S/O models may present particular challenges due to the long-time scales and model runtimes that are typically involved. Furthermore, the technical complexity introduced by using linked software packages and data-exchange libraries is a common issue in conventional approaches for the coupled model of such groundwater systems (Castilla-Rho et al. 2015). To address these limitations, integration of pillars in this study is performed via Python programming language, with extensive use of the Python FloPy library for writing inputs, and post-processing the majority of outputs. Compared with a low-level language (Fortran or C, for example), complex tasks can be achieved with a few lines of readable code in Python (Bakker et al. 2016).

Traditional optimization techniques tend to prematurely converge to a local optimum in solving complex non-linear non-convex problems, such as linear programming (Veintimilla-Reyes et al. 2018), non-linear programming (Bajany et al. 2021), and dynamic programming (Yu et al. 2017). As a stochastic global search optimization method, a genetic algorithm (GA) shows advantages in handling discontinuous and non-differentiable problems (Goldberg 1989; Yeh 2015). GA is widely used in the research of optimization problems because of its advantages, such as easy convergence and high accuracy (Ayaz 2017). Rahimi et al. (2014) combined the analytic hierarchy process and GA to identify the most suitable areas for the artificial groundwater recharge by ranking all the alternatives and weighing the criteria involved. Pramada et al. (2018) coupled SEAWAT with GA to determine the optimum pumping strategy, reducing the risk of pumping contaminated water. Hassan & Khalaf (2020) integrated the numerical groundwater model and GA to obtain the optimal use of groundwater resources in the Karbala Desert, Iraq. All the works mentioned above show the advantages of GA in the procedure of groundwater management, especially for the optimization of the facilities’ locations and pumping strategy, but the optimization of groundwater replenishment from the river has rarely been attempted in previous studies.

In this study, we present a S/O-GA model for groundwater replenishment from the Hutuo River. The calibrated simulation model was performed as a script-based model using the FloPy library (Bakker et al. 2022), which allows the MODFLOW-USG (Panday et al. 2013) model to be executed in a Python programming environment. Specifically, we optimized the volume of groundwater recharge from each river reach during the management period to maximize the recovery of the groundwater storage capacity under the upper limits for groundwater levels.

Study area

The Hutuo River alluvial fan is located in Hebei province, covering the Shijiazhuang metropolitan area and 21 counties or cities downstream of it, with a total area of 14,195 km2 (Figure 1(a)). The study area has a warm temperate continental monsoon climate with an average annual precipitation of 509.2 mm, mainly concentrated in the flood season (from July to September), while the average annual potential evaporation is around 1,100 mm, twice as much as the precipitation. The sources of EWR to the Hutuo River mainly include the upstream Huangbizhuang Reservoir and the m-SNWDP. To manage the surface runoff and the groundwater recharge volume, the sluice and rubber dams can be designed to adjust for each reach (R1-R7). The overall terrain of the alluvial fan is flat, where the northwest is high and descends to the southeast with a natural slope of 1%–2%. The length of the river is 179 km, and there are 41 observation wells on the sides of the river (Figure 1(a)).
Figure 1

Map of the Hutuo River: (a) Geographical position and observation wells distribution; (b) Hydrogeology profile (cross-section A-A′).

Figure 1

Map of the Hutuo River: (a) Geographical position and observation wells distribution; (b) Hydrogeology profile (cross-section A-A′).

Close modal

The principal aquifers in the study area are the Quaternary porous aquifers (Figure 1(b)). Based on the geological stratification of the Quaternary, the four strata Qh-Qp1 from new to old correspond to three aquifers. The uppermost two layers, Holocene and upper Pleistocene have coalesced into aquifer I, which is a phreatic-micro confined aquifer. The middle and lower Pleistocene correspond to aquifer II and aquifer III, respectively, and both are deep confined aquifers. From west to east, the thickness of the Quaternary alluvial deposits increases, and the grain size decreases. These Quaternary aquifers consist of gravels, coarse sand, locally fine sand, and discontinuous clay characterized by a stratified distribution. Groundwater flows from the northwest to the southeast in this area. The main recharge of groundwater is precipitation, river infiltration and lateral inflow, while the groundwater discharge is mainly artificial exploitation. The western aquifers boundaries are composed of the division lines between mountain and plain, processed as flux boundaries. Parallel to the streamline, the north-western boundary is a zero-flux boundary. The eastern and southern boundaries are administrative boundaries, which are processed as specified head boundaries, controlled by observed data (Figure 1(a)).

Implement of EWR

It is an essential objective of EWR to allocate the abandoned water before the flood period in the south, and to restore groundwater resources of the receiving areas in the north by using the surplus water supply capacity of the m-SNWDP. From September 13 to December 27, 2018, the cumulative water of 420 × 106 m3 flowed into the Hutuo River, including 365 × 106 m3 from m-SNWDP, 34 × 106 m3 from the reservoir, and 21 × 106 m3 from reclaimed water.

Groundwater flow simulation model

A three-dimensional transient flow model is used to simulate the groundwater flow in the study area, and the mathematical model of the groundwater flow model can be stated as:
(1)
where μ and μS are specific yield and specific storage, respectively; h is the hydraulic head; KL and KZ are horizontal and vertical hydraulic conductivity, respectively; p and ε represent recharge and discharge items of the phreatic and confined aquifers, respectively; h0 represents the initial head; h1 is the value of the specified head boundary; q is the value of the flux boundary; Ω represents the scale of the study area; Γ0 is the upper boundary; Γ1 is the specified head boundary; Γ2 is the flux boundary; Γ3 is the zero-flux boundary.

The numerical simulation model was based on MODFLOW-USG (Panday et al. 2013), which supports unstructured grid (U-grid) types, including nested grids. U-grid is more flexible than traditional structural grid generation method and is used to subdivide the grids along the main channel of the Hutuo River. With initial cell size of 2,000 × 2,000 m, the cells near the river are refined to 500 × 500 m, and the total cell number is 15,312. Based on the hydrology and geology conditions of the study area, the model consists of three layers, and the boundaries are shown in Figure 1(a). Particularly, specified flux conditions are used to simulate natural and artificial recharge from each river reach to groundwater. The distribution and values of hydraulic conductivity, regional topographic and geological conditions are supported by previous research (Zhang et al. 2009). Model simulations were performed for the period from January 2000 to December 2019. The first 15 years were used for model calibration, and the last 5 years were used for validation. The calibration of the groundwater flow model was manually adjusted by the trial-and-error method.

The Nash-Sutcliffe efficiency (NSE) and correlation coefficient (R) are used to evaluate the simulated precision and reliability of the calibrated model in terms of temporal and spatial variation. The performance criteria are defined as:
(2)
(3)
where I and J are the numbers of the stress periods and wells chosen for validation; ym,i (yo,i) is the simulated (observed) groundwater level for ith stress period; ym,j (yo,j) is the simulated (observed) groundwater level at jth observation well; and are the mean observed water level in time series and spatial distribution, respectively.

After the calibration and validation of the groundwater model, the simulation model for EWR is set up for the period from January 2020 to December 2029. The management period is 10 years divided into 40 stress periods, further subdivided into time steps of 90 days. The end of 2019 hydraulic heads are used to set the initial conditions for the S/O model. The same recharge and discharge over the previous decade (2010–2019) are considered.

Optimization model of groundwater recharged by river

The recovery of regional groundwater storage is the core objective of groundwater management in this study. Therefore, maximizing the total amount of water recharged into the aquifers from each reach of the Hutuo river is taken as the objective function. The constraint conditions comprise the riverbed infiltration capacity and upper limits of groundwater level. Accordingly, the objective function and constraints can be mathematically formulated as:
(4)
Subject to
(5)
(6)
where RT is the total amount of water recharged into the aquifers during the management period; N is the total number of river reaches; K is the total number of the stress periods; rn,k is the recharge rates of nth river reach in the kth period; tk is the length of the kth period; rn,min is the minimum recharge rate of nth river reach; rn,max is the maximum infiltration capacity of nth river reach; hs,k is the groundwater level at point s in the kth period; hs,lim is the upper limit of groundwater level at point s.

The Hutuo River between Huangbizhuang reservoir and Xian county is divided into seven reaches (R1-R7) as shown in Figure 1(a). Table 1 lists the basic characteristics and infiltration capacity of each reach. The maximum recharge rates are given according to previous research (Du et al. 2013) and the current condition of the river channel. Furthermore, the minimum recharge rate of each reach is set to one-tenth of the maximum recharge rate.

Table 1

Recharge characteristics of the Hutuo River

Reach numberLength (km)Mean width (km)Maximum water area (km2)Maximum recharge rate (×104 m3/d)Percentage of total recharge after optimization (%)
R1 32.46 0.30 9.74 105.56 35.69 
R2 19.49 0.25 4.87 44.37 16.09 
R3 18.34 0.20 3.67 33.55 15.80 
R4 16.11 0.12 1.93 14.31 9.25 
R5 32.07 0.10 3.21 22.35 14.29 
R6 26.11 0.11 2.87 12.83 8.07 
R7 35.13 0.07 2.46 3.12 0.81 
Reach numberLength (km)Mean width (km)Maximum water area (km2)Maximum recharge rate (×104 m3/d)Percentage of total recharge after optimization (%)
R1 32.46 0.30 9.74 105.56 35.69 
R2 19.49 0.25 4.87 44.37 16.09 
R3 18.34 0.20 3.67 33.55 15.80 
R4 16.11 0.12 1.93 14.31 9.25 
R5 32.07 0.10 3.21 22.35 14.29 
R6 26.11 0.11 2.87 12.83 8.07 
R7 35.13 0.07 2.46 3.12 0.81 

Considering the safety of underground infrastructures, the controlled limit value of groundwater table depth in urban areas is restricted to 15–20 m. In addition, to prevent the accumulation of salts in the soil, the limit value in the agricultural area is set to 2–5 m (Mu et al. 2020).

Solution by GAs

A GA realizes the heuristic search of complex space that finds the global optimal solution with a high probability by imitating the recombination and mutation of genes, which make them constantly have new traits to be retained in the process of biological evolution in nature. In this study, an improved GA with elite reservation is adopted that replaces the moderate of non-optimal individuals of the parent generation with the same number of individuals of the offspring population to get a new generation population (Deb et al. 2002). Hence, the convergence speed of the algorithm can be effectively improved.

Figure 2 schematically describes the S/O-GA model for river infiltration and sustainable groundwater management in the Hutuo River. In addition, the GA is further elaborated in the following section.
Figure 2

Flowchart of the S/O-GA model for optimizing the amount of groundwater recharge from the Hutuo River.

Figure 2

Flowchart of the S/O-GA model for optimizing the amount of groundwater recharge from the Hutuo River.

Close modal

GA begins by initializing a population of N individuals, each representing a possible recharge scheme in the feasible solution space. Then the phenotypes of individuals are written into the MODFLOW-USG input file. Run the groundwater flow model and obtain the groundwater levels for each stress period. The groundwater level constraints were handled using a penalty function. Individuals that violate the constraints are assigned a penalty factor that reduces their fitness. The fitness of individuals is evaluated by a fitness function that synthetically considers the objective function and the penalty function. Elite with the highest fitness of each generation will be reserved. Moreover, N-1 individuals are selected by the tournament method (Chu et al. 2018). The optimal individual of the parent generation and the offspring constitute a new population generation for crossover and mutation. Likewise, the new population is subjected to the same evolutionary process until a convergence criterion is satisfied or the maximum evolution algebra is reached. All the methods and calculations were carried out in a Python programming environment.

Model validation

According to the data from January 2015 to December 2019 chosen for validation, the average NSE of groundwater levels at 41 observation wells is 0.90, which means that the model can accurately reflect the response of groundwater levels to precipitation infiltration, river recharge and artificial exploitation. Figure 3 presents the correlations between simulated and observed groundwater levels at the end of 2019. The results show good correlation with the R of 0.97, which means the groundwater flow model can well reproduce the characteristics of the flow field.
Figure 3

Comparison of simulated and observed groundwater levels at the end of 2019.

Figure 3

Comparison of simulated and observed groundwater levels at the end of 2019.

Close modal

Performance of the GA

The GA is applied to determine the optimal solution for the groundwater recharged by the Hutuo river. The population size is set to 500, and the maximum number of iterations is set to 150. Randomness plays a substantial role in keeping the algorithm searching in the solution space. In this study, the probabilities of crossover and mutation are set to 0.70 and 0.03, respectively. The summary of the GA results and the optimized groundwater recharge scheme is as follows.

Figure 4 exhibits the maximum, average and minimum fitness values of all individuals in each generation during the evolution process. It can be seen that the GA reaches the convergence after the 75th generation, where the average fitness of the population is close to the optimal individual fitness, and the fitness no longer significantly increases with iterations. Individuals with the minimum fitness may have a larger amount of water recharged into the aquifers. Nevertheless, due to the water levels exceeding the upper limits, they are affected by the penalty function and have lower fitness. By maintaining moderate randomness, new possible solutions can be provided effectively and continuously while avoiding premature convergence to a local optimum.
Figure 4

Convergence histories of the GA.

Figure 4

Convergence histories of the GA.

Close modal

Optimization results

The total amount of water recharged into the aquifers is 5.36 × 109 m3 during the management period, and the percentages of recharge in each reach are listed in Table 1. The upper river reaches are the main recharge area, accounting for 67.58% of the total amount. This is because that the infiltration capacity of the upper reaches is better than that of the downstream channel. Moreover, due to its closer proximity to the cone of groundwater depression in Shijiazhuang, R1 has greater potential for recharge than R2 and R3. The annual average recharge from R1 is 1.91 × 108 m3/a. According to the previous study, if the volume of artificial recharge water in R1 is less than 7.86 × 108 m3/a, groundwater reservoir is a better storage method than the local reservoir (Du et al. 2013).

Optimal recharge scheme

Figure 5 displays the variation of the optimal recharge rate for each reach during the management period. The recharge rates of R1, R2, R3, R7 and the total show a significant decrease over time, while R4, R5, R6 recharge at a relatively stable rate close to the maximum recharge rate. The optimal recharge rate of the total can be divided into five stages, and the major factors causing both long-term and short-term variation of the optimal recharge rate curves are discussed in detail below:
  • (1)

    The maximum recharge rate can be sustained in stage I until the water level at a given location approaches the upper limit. Therefore, the duration of sustaining the maximum recharge rate for each reach is different, determined by the infiltration capacity and storage space.

  • (2)

    Stage II begins with the constraint effect of the upper limit water level which leads to the sudden drop in the optimal recharge rate. As lateral recharge from the river increases, the hydraulic gradient perpendicular to the channel decreases and the optimal recharge rate declines rapidly.

  • (3)

    Stage III represents a plateau period from around 2023 to 2025, which means the equilibrium between groundwater depletion and recharge has been achieved regionally.

  • (4)

    The second descent in stage IV is closely related to the past treatment policy on overexploitation of groundwater. Compared with 2023–2025 (2013–2015), the average annual groundwater exploitation for 2026–2028 (2016–2018) reduces by 18.44%; accordingly, the optimal recharge rate decreases by 17.23%.

  • (5)

    The recharge rate that maintains the stable groundwater level in the context of reducing groundwater exploitation is shown in stage V.

Figure 5

Optimal recharge rates of each reach during the management period; the dotted lines represent the average recharge rates.

Figure 5

Optimal recharge rates of each reach during the management period; the dotted lines represent the average recharge rates.

Close modal

The inherent stochastic nature of genetic algorithms is an unneglectable factor that influences the fluctuation of the curves in the plateau period. For instance, the maximum recharge rate can be maintained without exceeding the upper limit water level due to the relatively low infiltration capacity at R4, R5, and R6. In this case, the fluctuation of the recharge rate comes from the randomness in the process of GA's selection, crossover, and mutation.

Groundwater level variation

Figure 6 compares the groundwater level variation for two recharge scenarios: (1) Recharge with the optimal groundwater recharge scheme. (2) Keep the same amount of the water recharged into the aquifer during the management period, and recharge at a constant rate (the dotted line in Figure 5). The observation wells GW9, GW15, GW27, and GW35, greatly affected by the comprehensive influence of reach recharge, were selected to analyze the response of groundwater level to different recharge scenarios.
Figure 6

Groundwater level variation at selected observation wells in Figure 1(a).

Figure 6

Groundwater level variation at selected observation wells in Figure 1(a).

Close modal

As presented in GW9 and GW15, the rises of groundwater levels between regions mutually affect each other. When the groundwater level in GW9 reaches the upper limit, the optimal recharge rate of R1 declines rapidly, and the rate of groundwater level rise in GW15 decreases from 3.4 to 2.2 cm/d. Compared with the constant-rate recharge, the optimal recharge scheme dynamically adjusts the recharge rate according to the storage space and groundwater regime, so as to ensure that the groundwater level is maintained below the upper limit. However, in the area close to the R4, R5, and R6, the upper limit of groundwater level does not affect the optimal recharge rate of reach. Until the end of the management period, the groundwater level in GW27 is 26.1 m below the upper limit. Therefore, the optimization result almost coincides with the groundwater level under the constant-rate recharge scenario, and the infiltration capacity of the river reach is the main constraint for recharging. The recharge rate of R7 drops significantly before the level in GW35 approaches the upper limit. So, the reason why the groundwater level in GW35 is not maintained close to the upper limit is that the recharge rate holding the water level in GW35 constant will cause the calculated water levels in other cells along the river to exceed the upper limits.

To further analyze the effectiveness of the S/O model, the groundwater levels at the beginning and the end of the management period are displayed in Figure 7. The EWR changes the groundwater flow field, and the flow directions surrounding the river vary significantly, influenced mainly by the river recharge and groundwater withdrawals. With the relatively steep hydraulic gradient, the lateral outflow from the groundwater mounds along the river comprises about 26.20% of the total water input for the entire study area. However, by predicting the height and the extent of the groundwater mounding, EWR poses a potential threat to previously existing land use. Therefore, it is essential to formulate a reasonable recharge scheme during the EWR.
Figure 7

Comparison of groundwater level in 2020 and 2030.

Figure 7

Comparison of groundwater level in 2020 and 2030.

Close modal

Based on the EWR project of the Hutuo River, which has been implemented since 2019, this study proposed an optimization framework that integrates a GA with the MODFLOW-USG model to facilitate decision-making for groundwater management. The groundwater level data collected by fieldwork were used to validate the groundwater model. With NSE of 0.90 and R of 0.97, the results suggest that the model can accurately reflect the variation of groundwater levels caused by changes in hydrological regimes and anthropogenic interferences. From the performance of the GA, the population's fitness values rise with iterations, until the convergence is reached after the 75th generation, where the global optimal solution is obtained. Finally, the spatio-temporal optimal groundwater recharge strategy is presented, taking into account the upper limits for groundwater levels in different areas. The main findings are as follows:

  • (1)

    The optimization results show that the total amount of water recharged into the aquifers from the Hutuo river is 5.36 × 109 m3 from 2020 to 2029, and the main replenishment is concentrated in the upper reaches R1, R2, and R3, totally accounting for 67.58%.

  • (2)

    EWR significantly influences the groundwater flow field in the study area, and the groundwater recharge from the Hutuo River accounts for 26.20% of the total recharge. Nevertheless, the optimal recharge reduces as groundwater exploitation declines, which are 17.23% and 18.44%, respectively.

  • (3)

    Compared with recharging at invariable rates, the optimal recharge scheme can efficiently augment the groundwater storage without exceeding the upper limits of the groundwater levels.

The optimization framework based on the 3D transient groundwater flow model and GA has been found to be very effective for groundwater optimization problems and can provide a meaningful reference for the EWR. However, it takes a considerable computational effort to solve problems with the large-scale model and massive decision variables. Therefore, parallel computing methods are required to improve computational performance in the future.

This work was financially supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (41702282) and China Geological Survey Project (DD20190303).

All relevant data are included in the paper or its Supplementary Information.

The authors declare there is no conflict.

Ayaz
M.
2017
Groundwater pollution source identification using genetic algorithm based optimization model
.
International Journal of Computer Sciences and Engineering
5
(
10
),
65
72
.
Bajany
D. M.
,
Zhang
L. J.
,
Xu
Y. X.
&
Xia
X. H.
2021
Optimisation approach toward water management and energy security in Arid/Semiarid Regions
.
Environmental Processes
8
(
4
),
1455
1480
.
Bakker
M.
,
Post
V.
,
Langevin
C. D.
,
Hughes
J. D.
,
White
J. T.
,
Starn
J. J.
&
Fienen
M. N.
2016
Scripting MODFLOW model development using Python and FloPy
.
Groundwater
54
(
5
),
733
739
.
Bakker
M.
,
Post
V.
,
Hughes
J. D.
,
Langevin
C. D.
,
White
J. T.
,
Leaf
A. T.
,
Paulinski
S. R.
,
Bellino
J. C.
,
Morway
E. D.
,
Toews
M. W.
,
Larsen
J. D.
,
Fienen
M. N.
,
Starn
J. J.
&
Brakenhoff
D.
2022
FloPy v3.3.6 — Release Candidate: U.S. Geological Survey Software Release
.
https://doi.org/10.5066/F7BK19FH (accessed 01 October 2021)
.
Castilla-Rho
J. C.
,
Mariethoz
G.
,
Rojas
R.
,
Andersen
M. S.
&
Kelly
B. F. J.
2015
An agent-based platform for simulating complex human–aquifer interactions in managed groundwater systems
.
Environmental Modelling & Software
73
,
305
323
.
Chu
T. H.
,
Nguyen
Q. U.
&
O'Neill
M.
2018
Semantic tournament selection for genetic programming based on statistical analysis of error vectors
.
Information Sciences
436
,
352
366
.
Deb
K.
,
Pratap
A.
,
Agarwal
S.
&
Meyarivan
T.
2002
A fast and elitist multiobjective genetic algorithm: NSGA-II
.
Ieee Transactions on Evolutionary Computation
6
(
2
),
182
197
.
Ding
Y.
,
Liu
H. F.
,
Yang
W.
,
Xing
L. M.
,
Tu
G. Q.
,
Ru
Z. M.
&
Xu
Z. H.
2019
The assessment of ecological water replenishment scheme based on the two-dimensional lattice-Boltzmann water age theory
.
Journal of Hydro-Environment Research
25
,
25
34
.
Fei
Y. H.
,
Zhang
G. H.
,
Liu
K. Y.
,
Qian
Y.
,
Meng
S. H.
&
Li
Y. S.
2011
The adjustment of groundwater storage and utilization of river channel in North China Plain
.
Journal of Jilin University (Earth Science Edition)
41
(
Sup.1
),
265
271
.
(in Chinese)
.
Goldberg
D. E.
1989
Genetic Algorithms in Search, Optimization, and Machine Learning
.
Addison-Wesley
,
Boston
.
Hao
Q. C.
,
Shao
J. L.
,
Cui
Y. L.
,
Zhang
Q. L.
&
Huang
L. X.
2018
Optimization of groundwater artificial recharge systems using a genetic algorithm: a case study in Beijing, China
.
Hydrogeology Journal
26
(
5
),
1749
1761
.
Hassan
W. H.
&
Khalaf
R. M.
2020
Optimum groundwater use management models by genetic algorithms in Karbala Desert, Iraq
. In
IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering
, Vol.
928
, No.
2
, p.
022141
.
Kawo
N. S.
,
Zhou
Y. X.
,
Magalso
R.
&
Salvacion
L.
2018
Optimization of an artificial-recharge-pumping system for water supply in the Maghaway Valley, Cebu, Philippines
.
Hydrogeology Journal
26
(
3
),
963
977
.
Kinzelbach
W.
,
Wang
H.
,
Li
Y.
,
Wang
L.
&
Li
N.
2022
Groundwater Overexploitation in the North China Plain: A Path to Sustainability
.
Springer Nature
,
Bern
,
Switzerland
.
Li
J.
,
Gao
Y. Y.
,
Yan
L. Q.
,
Yao
J. W.
&
Chen
G. F.
2018
The practice of water operation and groundwater protection in the middle route of South-to-North Water Transfer Project
. In
MATEC Web of Conferences
, Vol.
246
, p.
01052
.
Long
D.
,
Yang
W. T.
,
Scanlon
B. R.
,
Zhao
J. S.
,
Liu
D.
,
Burek
P.
,
Pan
Y.
,
You
L. Z.
&
Wada
Y.
2020
South-to-North water diversion stabilizing Beijing's groundwater levels
.
Nature Communications
11
,
3665
.
Panday
S.
,
Langevin
C. D.
,
Niswonger
R. G.
,
Ibaraki
M.
&
Hughes
J. D.
2013
MODFLOW–USG version 1: an unstructured grid version of MODFLOW for simulating groundwater flow and tightly coupled processes using a control volume finite-difference formulation
. In:
Ch 45, Section A, Groundwater Book 6, Modeling Techniques
.
USGS
,
Reston, VA
,
USA
.
Pramada
S. K.
,
Mohan
S.
&
Sreejith
P. K.
2018
Application of genetic algorithm for the groundwater management of a coastal aquifer
.
ISH Journal of Hydraulic Engineering
24
(
2
),
124
130
.
Rahimi
S.
,
Roodposhti
M. S.
&
Abbaspour
R. A.
2014
Using combined AHP–genetic algorithm in artificial groundwater recharge site selection of Gareh Bygone Plain, Iran
.
Environmental Earth Sciences
72
(
6
),
1979
1992
.
Shokri-Kuehni
S. M. S.
,
Raaijmakers
B.
,
Kurz
T.
,
Or
D.
,
Helmig
R.
&
Shokri
N.
2020
Water table depth and soil salinization: from pore-scale processes to field-scale responses
.
Water Resources Research
56
(
2
),
e2019WR026707
.
Singh
A.
2014
Simulation and optimization modeling for the management of groundwater resources
.
I: Distinct Applications. Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering
140
(
4
),
04013021
.
Veintimilla-Reyes
J.
,
Meyer
A. D.
,
Cattrysse
D.
&
Orshoven
J. V.
2018
A linear programming approach to optimise the management of water in dammed river systems for meeting demands and preventing floods
.
Water Science and Technology: Water Supply
18
(
2
),
713
722
.
Yu
F. R.
,
Yan
B. Z.
,
Qu
J. H.
,
Li
Z. P.
,
Gao
Z. P.
,
Meng
Y. H.
&
Chen
J. Y.
2017
The dynamic programming management model of groundwater with covariates: a case study for the Songyuan area, Jilin Province, China
.
Water Science and Technology: Water Supply
17
(
5
),
1260
1267
.
Zhang
Z. J.
,
Fei
Y. H.
&
Chen
Z. Y.
2009
Investigation and Assessment of Sustainable Utilization of Groundwater Resources in the North China Plain
.
Geological Press
,
Beijing
,
China
.
(in Chinese)
.
Zhu
Y. C.
,
Li
Y. S.
,
Liu
Y. C.
,
Hao
Q. C.
,
Chen
L. N.
,
Li
B. H.
&
Kong
X. K.
2020
Screening method of preferred groundwater recharge source fields in the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei region based on improved DPSIR model
.
Research of Environmental Sciences
33
(
6
),
1357
1365
.
(in Chinese)
.
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Licence (CC BY 4.0), which permits copying, adaptation and redistribution, provided the original work is properly cited (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

Supplementary data