Abstract
Having good information about parameters that impact water quality can improve the management of water distribution systems in the short-term (optimising disinfection) and the long-term (planning rehabilitation). Full-scale data on the degradation of the residual disinfectant for various pipe characteristics are difficult to obtain but necessary. As the most common disinfectant is chlorine, this paper aims to determine the most important pipe and/or hydraulic system characteristics in the chlorine degradation coefficients. Such characteristics were identified based on statistical analyses that relate them with range values of bulk and pipe wall degradation coefficients estimated in full-scale conditions in a real distribution system. The results showed that among pipe characteristics, the period of installation impacts significantly kw and kt. Results of kw for three different materials confirmed that residual chlorine degradation at the pipe walls for grey-cast iron, which is older and metallic, is much higher than that for ductile cast iron and PVC pipes. In older pipes, up to 97% of residual chlorine can be degraded at the pipe walls, while the role of bulk reactions can reach about 35% in newer pipes. The obtained information can be integrated to identify pipes for rehabilitation/renewal and locations for booster rechlorination.
HIGHLIGHTS
Methodology can be used to estimate kw and kb in real water distribution systems.
The use of categories allows to identify the impact of the period of installation on kw.
Regressions showed that the period of installation is the most important factor that impacts kt and kw.
Statistical analyses showed that diameter does not impact the degradation coefficients significantly in this case study.
The chlorine degradation at the pipe walls for GCI is much higher than DCI and PVC.
INTRODUCTION
Having safe, odourless, and colourless drinking water in municipal water distribution systems (WDS) promotes public health and social acceptance of public water while decreasing plastic use associated with bottled water that can be harmful to the environment. Among the solutions to control water quality throughout a WDS are manipulating pressure set points and valves to control water paths (Vrachimis et al. 2020) to reduce water residence times and improving the management of secondary disinfectants to minimize bacterial regrowth (Chen et al. 2020). To safely monitor and manage water quality, some microbial indicators are used like total coliform and Escherichia coli (Wen et al. 2020). Monitoring residual disinfectant throughout the distribution system is a complementary strategy to microbiological monitoring. Nowadays, the most common secondary disinfectant is chlorine which should be detectable all the time, everywhere to minimize acute risks associated with microorganisms in the water (Luo et al. 2011). Chlorine is ‘detectable’ when its concentration is above the limit of quantification of the equipment used to measure it. However, water quality changes spatially and temporally throughout a WDS (Betanzo et al. 2008) mostly due to physico-chemical reactions that consume the residual disinfectant (Saidan et al. 2017). Residual chlorine degradation due to the physico-chemical reactions takes place in the bulk volume and at the pipe walls throughout a WDS (McGrath et al. 2021). Bulk degradation is mainly a function of natural organic and inorganic matter, water temperature, and disinfectant concentration, while pipe wall degradation depends mainly on pipe age, the presence of corrosion and/or biofilm and pipe material (Monteiro et al. 2020). Biofilm and corrosion, specifically in metallic pipes, can accelerate chlorine degradation, so pipe physical characteristics and ageing need to be closely studied and understood (Pasha & Lansey 2009).
There are no direct methods to determine pipe wall degradation (Lee et al. 2010). Pipe wall degradation can be estimated as the difference between total free chlorine degradation and bulk degradation (McGrath et al. 2021). Some pilot-scale studies have been also conducted to estimate pipe wall degradation, like the one by Liu et al. (2015). There are only a few studies that have produced values and ranges of kb and kw.Table 1 presents those found in the literature.
Kinetic constants kb (first-order) and kw in the literature
kb (10−3 h−1) . | T (°C) . | ![]() | Reference . |
---|---|---|---|
7.9–160.8 | NRa | 0.50–2.50 | Powell et al. (2000) |
22.9 | 25.0 | NR | Biswas et al. (1993) |
3.3–737.5 | 13.2–22.2 | NR | Vasconcelos et al. (1997) |
90–210 | 18.0 | NR | Lu et al. (1999) |
70–110 | NR | NR | Zhang et al. (1992) |
10–740 | NR | NR | AWWARF (1996) |
6 | NR | NR | Hallam et al. (2002) |
11.7 | NR | NR | Al-Jasser (2007) |
8–35 | 5–40 | ≈1 | Saidan et al. (2017) |
4.1–43.8 | 4–22 | 0.64–1.05 | McGrath et al. (2021) |
Average kw (10−3h−1) | T (°C) | Pipe material | Reference |
130 | NR | Cast iron | Hallam et al. (2002) |
90 | NR | PVC | Hallam et al. (2002) |
50 | NR | MDPE | Hallam et al. (2002) |
8.5–27.6 | 11–14 | PVC | McGrath et al. (2021) |
24.9–114.9 | 11–14 | Ductile cast iron | McGrath et al. (2021) |
58.8–114.9 | 11–14 | Grey-cast iron | McGrath et al. (2021) |
12 | 11–14 | Pre-stressed concrete | McGrath et al. (2021) |
kb (10−3 h−1) . | T (°C) . | ![]() | Reference . |
---|---|---|---|
7.9–160.8 | NRa | 0.50–2.50 | Powell et al. (2000) |
22.9 | 25.0 | NR | Biswas et al. (1993) |
3.3–737.5 | 13.2–22.2 | NR | Vasconcelos et al. (1997) |
90–210 | 18.0 | NR | Lu et al. (1999) |
70–110 | NR | NR | Zhang et al. (1992) |
10–740 | NR | NR | AWWARF (1996) |
6 | NR | NR | Hallam et al. (2002) |
11.7 | NR | NR | Al-Jasser (2007) |
8–35 | 5–40 | ≈1 | Saidan et al. (2017) |
4.1–43.8 | 4–22 | 0.64–1.05 | McGrath et al. (2021) |
Average kw (10−3h−1) | T (°C) | Pipe material | Reference |
130 | NR | Cast iron | Hallam et al. (2002) |
90 | NR | PVC | Hallam et al. (2002) |
50 | NR | MDPE | Hallam et al. (2002) |
8.5–27.6 | 11–14 | PVC | McGrath et al. (2021) |
24.9–114.9 | 11–14 | Ductile cast iron | McGrath et al. (2021) |
58.8–114.9 | 11–14 | Grey-cast iron | McGrath et al. (2021) |
12 | 11–14 | Pre-stressed concrete | McGrath et al. (2021) |
NR, not reported.
Since most of the previous studies have been conducted in laboratory-scale or -controlled conditions, there is a lack of conducted studies in real full-scale conditions. A full-scale study also highlights all the challenges that managers are faced with in a real WDS: in many older WDS, information is lacking on pipe materials and the period of installation to determine wall coefficients in the WDS. This lack of accurate data is an important issue that makes working on a full-scale case study difficult. In addition, it is not clear in previous studies which, among all pipe and system characteristics, play a vital role in the chlorine degradation kinetics coefficients. To overcome these shortcomings, the purpose of this paper is to develop and apply a methodology for estimating chlorine degradation kinetics coefficients in a WDS at full-scale conditions and determine the most effective hydraulics and pipe characteristics that impact the chlorine degradation coefficients. Hence, the specific objectives in this study are to (i) obtain kt, kb, and kw from full-scale sampling campaigns per pipe characteristics in a real WDS; (ii) analyse statistically the obtained kt, kw, and kb results to determine the most important system/pipe characteristics which affect the degradation coefficients, (iii) evaluate the range of kb and kw on the chlorine degradation according to the most important characteristics, and (iv) quantify the proportion of chlorine degradation from kb and kw. Generating knowledge about bulk and wall chlorine degradation coefficients for different pipe categories and the most important pipe characteristics that affect them is key to good decision-making. The proposed methodology can help managers to make appropriate decisions and reduce potential costs associated with secondary disinfection management with chlorine (including rechlorination) and with rehabilitation/renewal of WDS pipes.
METHODOLOGY
Case study
Quebec City (QC) main WDS and the three other WDS (SF, CH, BE; each from a different surface water source) supplying the region.
Quebec City (QC) main WDS and the three other WDS (SF, CH, BE; each from a different surface water source) supplying the region.
Pipe categorization
Pipes of the WDS were categorized according to their main physical characteristics including length, diameter, material, and the period of installation; the two latter influenced their Hazen–Williams coefficient. Pipes having the same range of diameter, material, and the period of installation were classified into one category, then the series of pipes in the same category were georeferenced to produce the longest series of pipes possible. The considered pipe materials were grey-cast iron (GCI), ductile cast iron (DCI), and polyvinyl chloride (PVC), which are the most common in our case study. At first, pipe diameters were divided into three groups: (1) small (less or equal to 150 mm, which are the local pipes); (2) medium (more than 150 mm up to 350 mm, which are the secondary pipes); and (3) large (more than 350 mm, which are the main distribution pipes). As Quebec City's main WDS is not densely populated (229/km2) and spreads over 486 km2, unsurprisingly, 150 and 200 mm diameters dominated the neighbourhoods and, therefore, nominal diameters were kept individually instead of ranges. Years of installation were grouped into periods of installation based on the municipality's development phases: (1) before 1945; (2) 1945–1960; (3) 1960–1970; (4) 1970–1980; and (5) after 1980.
Longest pipe sections in the same category and their sampling points
Water age and volume/flow verification
The EPANET model was run over 48 h to obtain water ages within the WDS based on the City's best estimate of average water demands subjected to their best estimate of hourly patterns. Model results showed that most of the pipes have a velocity of less than 0.18 m/s, which can be considered low. These low velocities would favour mass diffusion at the pipe walls in terms of chlorine demand. The water age outputted by EPANET is highly dependent on the water demands in the model. Although dynamic simulations were performed, these simulations did not influence the average water age significantly due to low variability in water demand patterns. Thus, water demands in EPANET were verified against flowmeter data in two ways. Firstly, the total consumed volumes within a neighbourhood in EPANET were compared with volumes obtained from the flowmeter data considering the water balance (inflow/outflow) in each neighbourhood for each sampling day. Secondly, flow passing through the main entry pipes of each neighbourhood for each sampling day was compared with the flowmeter data at the same location. Considering the difficulties associated with full-scale studies, a criterion ±25% between EPANET and field data was chosen in order to keep the sampling data for that sampling day for analysis. In the final step, WRT was calculated as the difference of water age at downstream/upstream points, which reduces uncertainties in the calculation of WRT, water losses, and their impact on WRT.
Sampling to determine kt, kb, and kw
To determine kt and kb and consequently kw, an extensive sampling campaign was essential. Water quality parameters such as detectable FRC, total chlorine concentrations, and temperature were measured in situ by using DPD colorimetric methods (Mercier Shanks et al. 2013) with a HACH colorimeter (DR900). The accuracy of the equipment used for chlorine measurement in situ was 0.02 mg/l. kt was determined from the FRC measurements obtained from the sampling campaign and WRT for each pipe section by Equation (1). A series of 12 bottle tests per neighbourhood entrance was also collected to obtain kb for each sampling day (García-Ávila et al. 2020). Chlorine concentrations were determined at different time intervals at the Université Laval laboratory for each entry point into a neighbourhood (C0). kb is assumed constant for each neighbourhood; this simplifying hypothesis is justified by the fact that there is little variation in temperature and water characteristics within a WDS for the same treated water during the same sampling day. kw was then obtained for each pipe category by subtracting kb from kt (Equation (2)).
Sampling campaigns were conducted for 36 days from May to August 2021 on Tuesdays, Wednesdays, and Thursdays between 9 and 16 h, outside the morning and evening peak water demands shown by the flowmeter data, to be closest to the average water demand in the EPANET model. The total number of sampling points was 133 points: upstream and downstream points of 65 pipe sections and 3 entry points of neighbourhoods. After each sampling day, a verification was made that the FRC concentration at the entry point into each neighbourhood (C0) was larger than the concentration at the upstream sampling point (C1) and the latter was larger than the concentration at the downstream sampling point (C2). The details about the sampling campaigns are presented in Table 2.
Details of sampling campaigns
Parameter . | Number . | Comment . |
---|---|---|
Neighbourhood | 3 | Figure 2 |
Category | 15 | Colours in Figure 3 |
Selected diameter | 2 | Mostly 150 and 200 mm; three 300-mm pipe sections |
Selected materials | 3 | GCI, DCI, and PVC |
Selected period of installation | 5 | Based on the municipality's development phases |
Identified pipe sections | 95 | Some of them are not accessible |
Accessible pipe sections | 65 | Numbers in Figure 3 |
Total sampling points | 133 | Upstream and downstream points of 65 pipe sections and 3 neighbourhood entrances |
Sampling days | 36 | May to August 2021 |
Sampling time | 9–16 h | Tuesday, Wednesday, and Thursday |
Water temperature range in the neighbourhoods (for valid data only) | 8–23 °C | The coldest day: May 19th, the warmest day: August 25th |
Water temperature range at neighbourhood entrances | 11.5–22 °C | The coldest day: May 27th, the warmest August: 24th and 25th |
Number of samplings at the same point | 3–5 | Decision based on previous results |
Collected samples to obtain kt | 556 | 3–5 times at upstream/downstream points of 65 pipe sections |
Collected samples to obtain kb | 108 | 3 neighbourhood entrances over 36 days |
Collected hermetically sealed water bottles | 12 | At each sampling from neighbourhood entrances |
Total collected samples | 664 | To obtain total and bulk coefficients |
Pipe sections with valid kt | 178 | Validation criteria C1 > C2 |
Pipe sections with valid kb | 174 | Entry point |
Pipe sections with valid kw | 152 | Validation criteria kt > kb |
Parameter . | Number . | Comment . |
---|---|---|
Neighbourhood | 3 | Figure 2 |
Category | 15 | Colours in Figure 3 |
Selected diameter | 2 | Mostly 150 and 200 mm; three 300-mm pipe sections |
Selected materials | 3 | GCI, DCI, and PVC |
Selected period of installation | 5 | Based on the municipality's development phases |
Identified pipe sections | 95 | Some of them are not accessible |
Accessible pipe sections | 65 | Numbers in Figure 3 |
Total sampling points | 133 | Upstream and downstream points of 65 pipe sections and 3 neighbourhood entrances |
Sampling days | 36 | May to August 2021 |
Sampling time | 9–16 h | Tuesday, Wednesday, and Thursday |
Water temperature range in the neighbourhoods (for valid data only) | 8–23 °C | The coldest day: May 19th, the warmest day: August 25th |
Water temperature range at neighbourhood entrances | 11.5–22 °C | The coldest day: May 27th, the warmest August: 24th and 25th |
Number of samplings at the same point | 3–5 | Decision based on previous results |
Collected samples to obtain kt | 556 | 3–5 times at upstream/downstream points of 65 pipe sections |
Collected samples to obtain kb | 108 | 3 neighbourhood entrances over 36 days |
Collected hermetically sealed water bottles | 12 | At each sampling from neighbourhood entrances |
Total collected samples | 664 | To obtain total and bulk coefficients |
Pipe sections with valid kt | 178 | Validation criteria C1 > C2 |
Pipe sections with valid kb | 174 | Entry point |
Pipe sections with valid kw | 152 | Validation criteria kt > kb |
Pipe categories
Proportion in length (%) of the various pipe categories in each neighbourhood: (a) LSC; (b) QN; and (c) VB.
Proportion in length (%) of the various pipe categories in each neighbourhood: (a) LSC; (b) QN; and (c) VB.
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
Number of sampling points after validation
The 65 sampled pipe sections, each with an upstream and downstream sampling point, were visited multiple times (3–5) over the summer to consider possible variabilities in water quality and temperature, resulting in a total of 556 collected samples. However, following the hydraulic (volume and flow) and sampling (concentration) verifications, the total numbers of pipe sections with associated valid data for all the sampling days for the determination of kt, kb and kw coefficients were 178, 174, and 152, respectively. About half of the valid results are related to QN (44.6%), which is the largest neighbourhood in our case study, and the rest are split almost equally between LSC (29.3%) and VB (26.1%).
Statistical analyses of kt, kw, and kb
To determine the most important hydraulic and/or pipe characteristics for chlorine degradation, some statistical analyses between chlorine degradation coefficients and identified hydraulic and/or pipe characteristics were done in the RStudio platform (Version 1.1.456). As the characteristics were independent and their number was more than two, multiple linear regression was chosen for the analyses. Three regressions were done to consider the role of various characteristics affecting kt, kw, and kb. To identify the most important characteristics, the obtained Pr(>|t|) from the regressions for each characteristic was considered. Pr(>|t|) is the probability of observing any value equal to or larger than t. If the Pr(>|t|) is less than a certain significance level, then the regressors (in this study, the characteristics) are said to have a statistically significant relationship with the regressands (kt, kw, and kb). According to Ganesh & Cave (2018), Pr(>|t|) < 0.001 indicates a very strong relationship, while Pr(>|t|) < 0.01 indicates a strong relationship, Pr(>|t|) < 0.05 a moderate relationship, Pr(>|t|) < 0.1 a weak relationship or a trend, and Pr(>|t|) ≥ 0.1 indicates no significant relationship. In this study, the significance for all the tests was set at 5% (Pr(>|t|) < 0.05), which is a moderate relationship, considering the high uncertainty associated with full-scale studies. As the characteristics that affect kt and kw were different from kb, the tested regressors were different. The characteristics (regressors) for each regression were chosen based on previous studies and preliminary work.
The first regression was done between kt (regressand) and the following variables: diameter, period of installation, chlorine concentration in the upstream sampling point (mg/l), and water temperature (°C) as regressors (Table 3). In the regression results, the period of installation with Pr(>|t|) = 8.2 × 10−4 is the most important regressor, while pipe diameter with Pr(>|t|) = 9,730.6 × 10−4 has the least impact on kt in this case. In most residential WDS of this case study, the high representation of 150-mm and 200-mm pipes influences these results.
Regression results
Pipe/hydraulic characteristics (regressors) . | Pr(>|t|) . | ||
---|---|---|---|
Regressands . | |||
kt (10−3h−1) . | kw (10−3 h−1) . | kb (10−3h−1) . | |
Diameter (mm) | 0.973062 | 0.970851 | – |
Period of installation (year) | 0.000823 | 0.000838 | – |
Upstream chlorine concentration (mg/l) | 0.035674 | 0.035653 | – |
Average water temperature (oC) | 0.066298 | 0.061183 | – |
Chlorine concentration at the entrance of each neighbourhood (mg/l) | – | – | 0.05036 |
Water temperature at the entrance of each neighbourhood (oC) | – | – | 4.71 × 10−9 |
Pipe/hydraulic characteristics (regressors) . | Pr(>|t|) . | ||
---|---|---|---|
Regressands . | |||
kt (10−3h−1) . | kw (10−3 h−1) . | kb (10−3h−1) . | |
Diameter (mm) | 0.973062 | 0.970851 | – |
Period of installation (year) | 0.000823 | 0.000838 | – |
Upstream chlorine concentration (mg/l) | 0.035674 | 0.035653 | – |
Average water temperature (oC) | 0.066298 | 0.061183 | – |
Chlorine concentration at the entrance of each neighbourhood (mg/l) | – | – | 0.05036 |
Water temperature at the entrance of each neighbourhood (oC) | – | – | 4.71 × 10−9 |
The second regression was done between kw as the regressand and its regressors which are the same as in the previous one. Unsurprisingly, the obtained results for kw are similar to the kt regression with the period of installation with Pr(>|t|) = 8.4 × 10−4 being the most important regressor and pipe diameter with Pr(>|t|) = 9,708.5 × 10−4 having the least impact.
The last regression is related to kb. In this regression, kb is the regressand and its regressors are water temperature (°C) and chlorine concentration at the entrance of each neighbourhood (mg/l); according to the results, the role of water temperature with Pr(>|t|) = 4.7 × 10−9 is significant in the model which previous papers have also confirmed (García-Ávila et al. 2020).
The main conclusion for the three neighbourhoods in this case study is that the period of installation affects kw and kt significantly. The upstream chlorine concentration also affects the kinetics coefficients to a certain extent, while the pipe diameter does not. For kb, water temperature, unsurprisingly, has a strong impact and the role of initial chlorine concentration is moderate. Therefore, in the following sections, results were only analysed based on these important characteristics for different neighbourhoods, while the other characteristics (diameter and water temperature), which do not have any special impact on kw and kt, were not considered for analyses of them. Moreover, as the material strongly depends on the period of installation, different materials were also considered.
Values of kb
Range of: (a) water temperature, (b) C0; and (c) kb coefficients, overall and by neighbourhood.
Range of: (a) water temperature, (b) C0; and (c) kb coefficients, overall and by neighbourhood.
Values of kw
kw coefficient ranges for the different pipe categories overall and per neighbourhood with the number of pipe sections in parentheses.
kw coefficient ranges for the different pipe categories overall and per neighbourhood with the number of pipe sections in parentheses.
Proportion of chlorine degradation from kw and kb
Proportion of kw and kb in the degradation of FRC according to the pipe material and the period of installation.
Proportion of kw and kb in the degradation of FRC according to the pipe material and the period of installation.
CONCLUSION
This paper considered different pipe categories in a real case study (Quebec City's main WDS) to estimate the range of kw, kb, and their proportion in FRC degradation and identify which parameters have significant impacts on the degradation. Thirty-six 1-day sampling campaigns in the summer of 2021 (from May to August) in three neighbourhoods were performed. Results demonstrated that (i) the proposed methodology can be used to estimate and
in real-scale WDS, (ii) the use of pipe categories allows to better identify the impact of the period of installation on
; (iii) the regressions showed that the period of installation is the most important factor that impacts
and
, (iv) the statistical analyses also showed that, considering the high proportion of 150-mm and 200-mm pipes in the sampling, diameter does not impact the degradation coefficients significantly, so 150 and 200 mm diameter pipes have similar
, (v) the ranges of
and
based on the most important characteristics (water temperature and chlorine concentration at the entrance of each neighbourhood for kb; material and period of installation for kw) were obtained, and (vi) the degradation at the pipe walls for GCI (median of 284 h−1) is much higher than for DCI (median of 78.6 h−1) and PVC (median of 40.4 h−1). GCI pipes are both older and metallic, two factors that impact chlorine degradation. In older pipes (GCI installed before 1945), up to 97.7% of FRC can be degraded at the pipe walls, while the role of bulk reactions can reach 34.8% in newer pipes (plastic installed after 1980). Accepting up to a 25% difference in volumes and flows between the EPANET hydraulic model and flow meter data during validation might seem substantial, but it is often a drawback of working with full-scale case studies.
Generating knowledge about bulk and wall chlorine degradation coefficients for different pipe categories and identifying the most important pipe characteristics that affect them are key to good decision-making such as identification of pipes for rehabilitation, renewal, and rechlorination. Future studies should focus on recognizing parts of WDS with low chlorine concentrations (vulnerable zones), finding the most cost-effective solutions to minimize chlorine degradation and vulnerable zones like improving water treatment at the plant to reduce organic matter content, optimise chlorine injection at the water treatment plant, and perform occasional or systematic rechlorination at key locations in the network.
DATA AVAILABILITY STATEMENT
All relevant data are included in the paper or its Supplementary Information.
CONFLICT OF INTEREST
The authors declare there is no conflict.